Finch-What it is to burn (Acoustic)

[alainachkar]

very different.. not even close to the originial..

[madregateador]

amazing...

[Afterlife088]

dont suppose anyone knows where i can get the guitar tab for this version?

[Artisticlife2]

this reminds me of 99/2000!! I miss you bro!!! what is it to burn...when your burning inside!

[keyransolo]

@Artisticlife2 me too bro good times.

[Ahsikor]

go nate barclowe on guitar!!!!!!

[helbersnk]

lo maxion finch me a gustadom muchisimo



[kxradio]

The original is great, but the acoustic proves that you have a range of talent -- especially when you have the guts to just play a new take on your music... and without all the impressive equipment or backing you up.

[Artistforest]

they should really have an accoustic, album.

it'd be awesome!

[lucianodutto]

hahaha they are geeks!

[Artisticlife2]

i saw them in 2000 at the show box!...damn where does the time go...

[smithers901]

@Artisticlife2 Showbox in Seattle?

[WeAreAWalkingTragedy]

i always like acoustic versions of any song slightly more than the original, idk why but theres somthin about an acoustic guitar that just gives you more emotion

[ThinkMeDead]

All the new people who just started liking finch are poor. Finch are old school to me. And still loving them.

[ohnofoshohoe]

Whoever doesn't like or thinks this is weird is ignorant of the world of music. This is a great acoustic interpretation.

[samsta001]

idk something sounds off...but its ok i guess i prefer the other version

[Lovechild2t9]

em...no guys, i don't like this one at all

this nearly ruined my liking of the original. stop this now.

[springyowl]

Check the video responces i made it myself cos i didnt like this one

[momoka4]

IT SOUNDS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT!!!...And I like it!

[ChuloGoatWild]

what the beef. I thought it would sound like original, obviously first 10 seconds told me it wasn't. But it all good. I think he good singer, maybe what gets me pissed off is how he looks.

[THeEraSerr]

yea randy said in an interview that he's a great guitarist so im thinking he writes some songs that the others build upon

[levey24]

i like how nate doesnt play guitar in concerts (a lot) and he seems at least decent ... does he write a lot of their songs?

[letsleaveatdawn]

i love finch but this sucks

sorry

[rushgear671]

pretty okay

[PersonallyPro]

i think it's very creative, although they contrasted a lot from the original version, I really like this one to. very nice to relax and just listen with your eyes closed.

[s2thalayer]

give em a break guys. they made it sound like an indy/acoustic song, where as it was such a heavy song before. they just wanted to calm it down, so they changed it around a bit. its good, dont be so afraid and unaccepting of change.

[htonehero]

I can sing through my nose too. Drop d is awesome. Lack of taleny is a must these days!

[hotthockeyplayer07]

If you cant hear the bass you must be tone deaf, cause i can hear it just fine.

[PerfectChloe]

This sounds really nice I think =) x

[lasthavoc]

That sounds nothing like it should have. I've seen better acoustic covers on here of this song by their fans...

[DefyAll0dds]

lasthavoc, how can you say it sounds nothing like it should you moron, THEY wrote it, THERE THE ONES who made the song

so how can you say fans play it better when THEY WROTE IT

moron

[lasthavoc]

lol you think because it's their song that it means they'll play it the best? you're telling me you've never heard someone make a cover of a song and like their "new version" better than the original? for instance, i think the fray's cover of heartless is better than kanye's.

They tried to take this acoustic version in a different direction from the original and completely failed as it loses everything that made the original great and doesn't even sound like the same song. btw blow me.

[DefyAll0dds]

So your saying the frays cover is better, and lemme guess the fray, arent they a renown band?

so your saying a professional band played another artists song a diferent way better?

which has no bearing on your original comment about FANS playing it better

i never said the fans can play it better, but THEY wrote the song so yo ucant say they dont play it as good as the fans bc the FANS could be the ones playing ti a different way moron

[lasthavoc]

The Fray was an example. But yes, there are fan videos on here that play the song acoustic better than this version hands down.

Obviously your problem is that you're upset that I dissed your beloved Finch because I think this acoustic version is lacking and I've been more impressed by fans acoustic youtube covers than Finch's. Do you honestly believe a fan's COVER has to sound like theirs? That why it's a cover you douche. And incidentally I like theirs better. Don't cry emo.

[DefyAll0dds]

beloved finch?

i like 2 of there songs lol

and obviouslyt your the fan boy bc i said te FANS COVER is gonna sound different of course, but it doesnt mean it sounds BETTER since FINCH WROTE THE DAMN SONG

what dont you get about tht?

[lasthavoc]

You think since Finch wrote the song inevitably theirs is the best iteration. Sorry, no. Especially cuz Finch was never that good of a band so it wouldn't be difficult to take the basics of the song and outdo them.

I mentioned The Fray cover and you said oh those guys are renown. Your logic is that you can only outdo a band if you're renowned? You're retarded. There's guys jamming in their Mom's basement that could play circles around them and make a cover of this song that would make you cry.

[thekoookmeister]

Because it sounds nothing like the original version of the song. You can hardly call it an acoustic version of "What it is to Burn". It might as well be a different song completely. I like the original song, but this is boring. He is also a horrible singer.

[TheHawkdaddy]

I cant hear the bass :/

[chrisman090]

its okay he should of added more emotion to his voise and made it more punkish.

[MCSizzle1116]

Acoustic versions are (a lot of the time) completely different form the original. I like it because of that reason. But everyone has different taste.

[iamrichlol]

The chords are completely different, like the progression doesn't even relate...wtf

[pezfx]

This version has grown on me over the years- it's different and i think it adds the opportunity for the acoustic side of things to show, the emotion and stuff, I guess.

'oh no! the progression isn't the same!! I can't play my guitar anymore!!'- lol invest in some creativity

[joshrice71]

i agree with jacobsdestruction

not at all as good as the original

they are much better than that

[alphaguitar2]

lol @ scrubs.

finch has been a progressive band in their scene ever since they began.

how can you expect a prog band to not get bored and want to switch things up.

[rushgear671]

doesnt sound the same,but it is still awesome!

[SSJ7itachi]

i love the song and all u hater can fuck off, if u dont like the way the song is done then dont listen u fuckers!!!!

[jacobsdestruction]

okay sorry but what the fuck.... as much as i love finch, they completely butchered this song..... its not sooo bad but it was sooo much better the other way...

[Fujioka1]

reason why its call acoustic version.. If you like Finch then what are you complaining about? This was a good "Acoustic" version.

[chopetexxx]

i dont like acoustic version

[Neyowolf]

I love Finch but I have to say... this is very bad. There is no sense of rhythm or movement. I don't think Strohmeyer thought about this one enough. I hear quite a bit of mistakes as well.

[thekevinatorr]

i love the singers watch man.haha

[iate47goats]

i lyke this version of the song its different :P

[paragonx88]

sounds good, but it doesn't sound like the original at all.

[GeorgiaMarkham]

It's a good song :)

[wishf00l]

delete this fucking video!! it suckss dick!! shitshitshitshitshitshitshitsh­itshitshitshitshitshitshitshit­shitshitshitshitshitshitshitsh­itshitshitshitshitshitshitshit­shitshitshitshitshitshitshitsh­itshitshitshitshitshitshitshit­shitshitshitshitshitshitshitsh­itshitshitshitshitshitshitshit­shitshitshitshitshitshitshitsh­itshitshitshitshitshitshitshit­shitshitshitshitshitshitshitsh­itshitshitshitshitshitshitshit­shitshitshitshitshitshitshitsh­itshitshitshitshitshitshitshit­shitshitshitshitshit

[italiabiotch]

well so do you.

[Jakiejay123]

sorry i dont. i only eat out of my girlfriend every night, faggot.

[italiabiotch]

WHAT THE FUCK!! all i asked was if the lead singer was nate or not. what is your fucking problem you prick!

[geekwad0716]

fuckup

[dannydandans]

LOSER!!! Its class.

[kyleblackwood]

loving how they make the acoustic so different to the original=]

[janohxcdestroy]

fea version ajjjjjjjj

[keksiiee]

great song :]

[liamberry08]

god they are a right let down

[hephephurray696]

horrible!

[lasthavoc]

this has none of the characteristics that make the original version good...

could've been way better.

[xneverxforgetx]

nate is beautiful. I love their lyrics. They are really awesome. [=.. The guy playing base is actually soo cool! x

[superocin]

ilike the original one better.. but its good though.

[payneis1]

omg this song is amazing! i like the original version and i love the acoustic version!

[Kaka194]

I love Nate !!

[italiabiotch]

is Nate the lead singer or the guitarist? he looks different to me

[NicMyst27]

Lead singer.. not bad with an accoustic though.

[ric0rich]

It's a Deftones version.

[Tudgie2]

Why are you people neg repping this guy, hes right it sounds alot like the deftones, he didn't mean it is the deftones, +1 buddy!

[SuJuluv08]

hmm its okay but i dunno. i guess for me this song is suppose to be little..less calm....

[XxYourGuardianAngel]

God it sounds so much different in acoustic don't you tihnk?

[Liamm955]

This Is sick but Chiodos Are Better TBH

[noestabien]

they change stuff up so much in their accoustic versions.

[lslewis]

I kind of like this version better than the original. It's way different than the original but has a life of its own!

[Joel1304]

hell yeah, i just saw them in brighton. so far my best gig this year

[beccihiggs]

I saw them in Nottingham last night. Aren't they so amazing? I was right at the front and it was incredible.

[Joel1304]

yeah so was i, nate got a bit drunk and started slagging of tommy lee, hilarious

[sweetStickman]

woohoo soo awesome....finch...my friend said, they dont exeist anymore...is that true?

[xxSceneDreamxx]

They do exsist, they split up but got back together last year, toured and released a new EP this July. They're touring the UK next week.

[snowboarderkate7]

omg this song is amazing acoustic!!..his voice is amazing on this one!

[PostHardcoreSociety]

F

I

N

C

H

<3

[JKoscheck]

This was horrible. Way of of tune, way to slow.

[fabrizio792]

finch rulez

[JmezFIT]

wait what do u mean u cant find this song you obviously were watching it so i dont get that

[ResidentEvilca941]

JmezFIT, maybe what the meaning was is that iceqfloryn couldn't find it anywhere to download.

[JmezFIT]

good point

[dezcooki]

ResidentEvilca941, but u can download this video using a youtube downloader software.. so there's no way u can't download it.. so JmezFit is right...

[Kyle2552]

hey i just did a cover of this version! check it out :)

[emiliano1223]

me encanta esta canción..... y más en acústica!!!

[iceqfloryn]

this song is amazing ! I love it :X I'm sad because I can't finde it nowhere :( if someone haves it, PLEASE, send me an email whit it . iceqfloryn@yahoo.com is my email adress. Thank you !