the statement that space and time are properties of the tings-in-themselves is most definitely wrong (we can't say nothing about those for Kant, that is the reason why the Kant-following Germ. idealism arouse)... i think you made that because of the high emotional atmosphere of the discussion at that point.
Also speaking of time/space as a distinction within/between concepts is very misleading ... in a way it's a Lockian-abstractionist way of speaking. Time/sp. are preconditions not abstractions
the statement that space and time are properties of the tings-in-themselves is most definitely wrong (we can't say nothing about those for Kant, that is the reason why the Kant-following Germ. idealism arouse)... i think you made that because of the high emotional atmosphere of the discussion at that point.
Also speaking of time/space as a distinction within/between concepts is very misleading ... in a way it's a Lockian-abstractionist way of speaking. Time/sp. are preconditions not abstractions
mindauggas 1 year ago