Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (634)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Great video! Well done, clearly shows people 90degree turns, stops, acceleration, etc... Undeniable.

  • Hey its the Millennium Falcon

  • why do you wont ufos any way nasa trying feed your need, and keep money coming in whats next citys on moon you never want to leave,all under on roof, or sould i say never can leave nasa will always fake us out

  • I think this was nasa's last live space broadcast,i saw this live it looked surreal then,i told my father what i thought then and he just looked at me and smiled,hes a hollyroller,?hes a dumb ass just so you know lol. ufo ,no elf its bio electronic powers far past are own .elf electric,life,form.....or more brain washing ????maybe its like this give them what they want and they let us live or is space really like water more then you think ,or ponasa is fake but this was live tv l25Years ago

  • 2 km bacteria?????

  • "we don't know what it is so it must be-"let me stop you right there

  • Hey thats awesome, how do you create the paths? can it be done in sony vegas? thanks

  • Inter-dimensional crafts which pop in and out of this dimension (density) by changing their vibratory rate....

  • @cc0ldt Ahhh! I agree with you :D

  • Brilliant footage @lunaCognita. I'm amazed how bacteria zoom in context with the tether - surely they . Amazed how sceptics (agents of the secret empire) can believe they are in the right when there is incontrovertible video like this. When is disclosure coming?

  • That is microscope sea life.

  • you fucking unimpressive people ulpoading real footage of extraterestrial craft with none unimpressive fucking music knowing its real footage and you cant doshit about it..you make me fucking sick you stupid uneducated people...why post your shit woooo..fucking stupid people

  • @MrMilfhunter2003 Maybe you should go back to hunting milfs. I think you will be happier.

  • get a life this is all u got and always will be all u got..rite..

  • fucking awsome really im impressed.////sooo we got proof what now???

  • Great vid, nice work on the footage! ... and you were right, the stabilized footage is easier to watch and the motion tracks make it pretty obvious even to laymen that those objects were not on natural ballistic trajectories, they were on various arcing paths and clearly changed speed and direction as well, only things under intelligent control do that, be it critters or vehicles. No type of lens flares or image artifacts I know of can recreate that display either. Really makes you wonder... ;)

  • i still do not have the answer why particles pop up out of nowhere

    must be Potter practicing and of course a secret from Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry

  • I have just seen dust/ice particles double back on themselves and turn corners. Some even seem to have their own energy source. The tether isn't pulsing so it can't be the light source.

    I have always liked this footage. I still do.

  • if those shit are ice particles, so space is full of water !

    Legalize TRUTH and criminalize pedophile cabal government !

    let's re-write reality

  • NASA is definetly feeling more to be involved in bullshit these days. Remember people losing interest in NASA because it was more forthright about Apollo program. Now people are more interested in NASA because they are more mysterious. People are idiots when the answers are simply given out. Now people have to think more deeply and average people don't like that. Hit that nerve and it becomes more important. This footage is fake.

  • @tnasburypl Please explain why you think its fake. Dust particles? Dust particles dont change speed and direction without some type of force as wind or gravity effecting them right? Dust particles dont pulse and flicker with light right? Unless a pulsing flickering light source is reflected off of them. I see some of them go behind the tether as well, unless this is some type of illusion, it would seem a lot of these things are huge. What do you think?

  • @CWBou812 Look. I don't believe all the footage. Starts off genuine enough.. But this video has been circulated several times and has been changed around a lot. I am just saying that people do not pay attention to everything on one video clip. Speaking of Airy Discs, there seems to be large satellites, people aren't noticing, that you can see with the naked eye from the ground. Mistaking them for Venus or Jupitor. I believe they are called membrane satellites.

  • Well, what is it?? How does nasa explain this video? Its certainly bizarre, whatever it is.

  • ¡¡¡me puede halguien decir que son estas cosas que pasan de un lado a otro,,,parece placton espacial....

  • i want that for christmas on my room ceiling :D

  • A-fucking-men! :)

  • Anyone who believes NASA or the government explanations for anything we see is the MORON. Love this country but the nation is going to shit because of all the lies and BS! And if you think we are alone out here then you're just a frightened child filled with wishful thinking so you better go grab your teddy bear and hide.

  • @drslash33 I agree. People are scared of the truth. Pop their bubble and watch them lie about it too!

  • Interesting video. I didnt think they had anything that long up there. Interesting how one of the objects moves along the length of it then turns at the end. What are they supposed to be and why cant we see them from earth if they are miles long. More government secrets?

  • FBI the vault (vault.fbi.org) - unexplained phenomena - UFO - 1 of 16 PDF - page 64.

  • The thing that bothers me is, in the original footage, you can see one of those things (whatever they are, I'm not saying they're ufos) making what looks like a controlled right hand turn. It's not as evident in this vid but you can still catch it. Around 6:03, one of the things comes in fast from the top of the screen, then slows down and continues at a slower speed towards the right side of the screen. Check out the original. Btw, what's the official explanation of this?

  • First of all life can NOT exist in a vacume. All life needs nutrients, and energy. Unless it's supernatural like an angel or something that then just exists for the sake of existing and has no external needs. Also since all life needs water (which BOILS in a vacuume) it can't exist in space. There's no way that stuff seen in space is alive.

  • @BankaiIchigo12345

    How do you know life can't excist in the vacuum of space? where did yo get this information from? scientist's?

    The same scientist's that understand the entire universe in every detail?

  • @BankaiIchigo12345 WATER BEARS

  • i would like to believe this but i dont. all of these float in a straight path. that one that shows the ufo doing a corner is bullshit. it does not show the ufo do that

  • NASA c'mon you have embarrassed yourselves WAY too many times. I used to think these were dust/microscopic debris around the camera until I thought about it more. This video points out all of the reasons why it isn't any of those. Also, the camera was outside the shuttle, derrrr. Yeah, I felt dumb after realizing its not dust mites inside the shuttle. This is some amazing footage even if it wasn't ufos interfering with the device. NASA the hell are you up to with my money.

  • maybe its weather balloons =P flying in outer space and stopping then making turns and curbs n stuff. dam weather balloons. lol (sarcasm off the scales) f.y.i.

  • Merkabas

  • These are more than likely UFO's. But UFO's don't always mean aliens. More than likely they're government owned and operated. Some type of alien defense system.

  • Awesome job done here. I am particularly impressed with he stabilization process used. I feel confident in my beliefs of the unknown. Why shouldn't anyone? Disbelief in only what is chosen is evidence of denial. On a lighter note... what ever happened to the swamp gas excuse decades gone by? That was an all time denial favorite. Now it seems the new generation is shrouded with ice particles and booster starts. The fact that excuses are made so quickly and that no investigations are ever done.

  • So lets get real here!! Im 32 and clearly remember in 96 or 97 this footage was followed for a couple days on the news, after it broke, we followed it for miles till it was a f*ckn dot . We have been preparing our society for 30 years for what we are about to learn.

  • People keep saying this shit is bacteria/debris/etc but u clearly see that they fly behind the tether qnd therefore MUST be huge!!!

  • Why the stupid music in this vid? really puts me off taking this seriously.

  • you can see one of them moves directly along side the tether, moving parallel, then when it gets to the end it does a big u-turn around the front of it. To me it looks like they are just checking out what the hell it is and making sure it is not a weapon of some kind as they know we are prone to violence as a species

  • This video has been out for 2 years! It should be beyond viral now. this guys serious about his shit

  • ALL of those things looks like a cosmo-bilogical living creatures...from the first look!

  • space well is in direct, controlled bursts of our engines. Meaning these things have some other way of propelling themselves, because guys, they are turning FAST. Much faster in fact, then we should be able to do so ourselves. Think about that for a while and tell me whether or not this is faked.

  • It looks like we have some catching up to do if we want to be the dominant life form in the solar system. Because guess what - NASA hasn't even tried to find out what these things are. Has. Not. Tried. Well doesn't that make our space protection rather slim to nil? Sure, they could most likely be asteroids going near a small body of dense matter that we may not see - but still, some of them are doing a LOT of intricate space manuevuers. The only way in which we humans know how to travel through

  • the next con unless i missed it, is they never slightly adjust direction, every close shot has them going in a straight line off screen. The next is with how many are spotted in the video, no other sightings, or videos that have these objects shapes. But that can go both directions, maybe just passing by, maybe not real. But that is all the cons for me. I think in the end, 80% for me says "there goes predator!" :P but never forget, the camera doesn't always tell the truth.

  • the Pulsating at a constant rhythm also catches my attention. Most of space is very chaotic and constantly changing. Also the speed variations. The cons...Why is every spaceship/ufo/alien flying around on a giant ass dinner plate..ok do this. How do we fly. Think of an object. I would guess it is surrounded in metal, has a plane shape, wings, cockpits, and at the back an engine..My point is we have no idea what an alien spaceship would appear as. Maybe they use bubble. Or some stream of light

  • would happen collapsing or putting nations in critical condition. For what? Theres not much we can do about it anyways but point a finger and take pictures, odds probably are they wouldn't be hostile, and mind their own business, perhaps "explorers" have come before, but just to expand their knowledge and maps of the known universe. Keeping that in mind here's my take on the video. The Pros are the directions some of these take. It seems it would require some kind of propulsion system

  • hmm..do I believe that life is possible in the universe...yes. Intelligent life?..yes, but much more rare. But the size of the universe would i believe have many intelligent species. Is Nasa some evil secret organization? no, but if they did find something, it would make more sense to keep it private to protect society. How fast could the system collapse if all of a sudden its announced "they" are near. From the media its already made every alien out there hostile. I bet a world wide Panic

  • @taintedcashle You can philosophize, speculate or debate about this footage a verly long time .. but I gotta admit that the whole place looks like "full of intelligent life" to me, that's all I can say about that.

  • Objects passing behind the tether would have had to be AT LEAST, hundreds of yards across. This is provable mathematics, due to the known dimensions of the tether. Likewise, the ability to make 90 degree turns. The STS-75 incident is the best indicator, short of a landing on the White House lawn in broad daylight, of artificial craft under intelligent control. Thank you once again, LunaCognita, for furthering this research!

  • Comment removed

  • At 2:18 the "NASA camera" is shaken while recording without panning, right after big brother microbe drops in and swims to the right. NASA's video equipment is more stable and clearer than this,without any backlash in servo's of any type. And if there were that many objects (trash,spacerocks,ice chips?) in low earth orbit moving that fast that close to satellites, Space Shuttles, and the ISS, they would sustain heavy and fatal damage.

  • look at the shape...does dust have a hole in the center of it

  • dust would react differently to nearby mass in a zero gravity environment.

  • Lightbulb + dust = this video.

  • @eryxsid YEAH MAN I AGREE

  • @z0phhy Yeah these wanna "Scientists" suck.

  • @eryxsid Wannabe**

  • @eryxsid Too right they do, haven't got a clue whats going on. Dust is a good way to put it in this scientific context.

  • @eryxsid

    @z0phhy

    Firstly, it's an authentic video taken by Space Shuttle Columbia in 1996, live-transmitted worldwide.

    Secondly, many of the objects

    1) pulsate at a regular rate,

    2) pass behind the 20km-long tether,

    3) make more-than-90-degree turns.

    What kind of 'dust' are they?

  • @mirandansa Its just dust.. not a ''kind'' of dust.. dust is dust.. its just dust.. No? anyone? dust.

  • @eryxsid

    You completely ignored my points. Watch from 04:25 -- What kind of dust can make such consecutive sharp turns or clean zig-zag motions? What kind of dust can be so huge compared to the 20km-long tether behind which they past? What kind of dust can pulsate at such a regular rate?

    These aren't dust. These objects are intelligently controlled. The question is: Who are operating them?

  • @mirandansa Umm.. its dust.. Doesnt take a scientist to realise that.. Next time you see dust floating around in a room, give it a slight blow and youll notice how they move.. The reason they are so large in this, is that the camera used to film this nonsense is zoomed into the dust specks so close..

  • @eryxsid "give it a slight blow and youll notice how they move"

    I know that dust move. I don't know that dust make sharp turns or zig-zag motions in vacuum space. (There were the shuttle's nozzles that could blow things in the space, but certainly not in the way the objects in this footage maneuvered.)

    "the camera used to film this nonsense is zoomed into the dust specks so close"

    Many of the 'dust specks' passed behind the tether. You can't zoom into the back without zooming into the front.

  • Now explain why he omitted the footage where the focus is adjusted. It clearly shows the objects transformed from notched circles of confusion to random shaped blobs tumbling through space 'in front' of the tether. The tether widens as the objects shrink!. This would only be possible if the objects were in the foreground, and the tether was in the background.

    Stubbs is a nice guy, but he's not the sharpest tool in the box by a long chalk.

    The objects all make 1 turn, always towards earth!

  • Debunkers say this is a bunch of camera artifacts...  they have examples with one or more similar things on the screen... but never with 50+ at a time!

    I get the skepticism though... the whole thing reminds me of Mark Twain's unfinished story, "The Great Dark".

  • @doctordrewl

    You only need one example of a camera artifact. It doesn't matter how many objects you place in the same situation, they will abide by the same laws.

    The problem you people have, is that you can't differentiate between optical (video artifacts), orbital mechanical (movement) and circumstantial (event/quantity/source/directi­on/distance) phenomena.

    There's no reason why multiple objects can't look the same, while moving in different directions, without a shred of life!

  • @MoronAntidote "You people..." C'mon now. I don't claim to know what this is. And yet, I find the jargon in your explanation uninspiring... I'm not trying to insult you or other debunkers, but I still can't figure out how one camera is casting so many artifacts at the 3:30 mark. Also, when I freeze frame the shot at 6:04 and enhance the image, the disk clearly appears to be in the shadow of the tether... If you have the "antidote" to explain this, please, do. "You people..."

  • @doctordrewl

    If it's jargon to you, then perhaps you just don't understand it? If that's the case, 'uninspiring' becomes irrelevant.

    I'm not insulted, and i'm not a debunker. Bunk speaks for itself. It stands to reason that people who believe bunk would claim even the greatest authority on earth was a debunker. It's merely a reflection of the bunker.

    A nearfield out of focus object becomes a faint, translucent image of the lens interior, allowing intense focused objects to dominate.

  • @doctordrewl

    That explanation probably made no sense to you either, but does that necessarily mean anything? It's a hard thing to explain, and there isn't much space here!

    The best thing you can do is watch the various demonstrations of this effect right here on YouTube, or better still, buy a camera and see for yourself. It's a well known phenomenon amongst photographers, and hasn't been a mystery for almost as long as photography has existed.

    Try it.

  • This is a very interesting analysis.  I'm of the opinion that what we are seeing are simply very small, very close, typically out-of-focus particles. I suspect perhaps particles coming off the tether when it snapped. The particles being right outside the window perhaps appear to change direction when the camera is moved by the cameraman. The camera would be free floating and would be easy to manipulate in such a manner. You can see similar motions of particles in footage taken underwater.

  • @SirMildred76

    Many of the objects pass behind the 20 km tether. If the changes in their directions were camera artifacts, it would have affected the tether's appearance as well, which we don't see.

  • I'm a little shocked at what people let themselves believe

  • it just shows you that not only are they here but they are here in numbers. a wake up call. good work.

  • I guess I will be MORON 21 but being in the medical field I can tell you this looks like the junk (bacteria) often seen on dirty slides under a microscope. What does this really prove?

  • @diddydee65

    This NASA footage is giving us a view that NASA says was taken by a UV-camera mounted in the shuttle payload bay. The long, thin object is, according to NASA, a tether cable which broke free from the shuttle tether experiment a few days prior. For a sense of scale, NASA officially says the tether you see is almost 20 KILOMETERS long and 140+ KILOMETERS away here. All those objects we see that you mentioned resemble bacteria under a microscope are actually in space. What are they?

  • @LunaCognita

    No, NASA has never said that this footage was filmed using a UV camera. The UV TOP camera was present during the mission, but people make the false assumption that it was used exclusively. It was only used during experiments while the satellite was tethered to the shuttle.

    The myth was started by David Sereda, and all evidence suggests that the camera was in fact a payload bay mounted SIT Vidicon camera. I have footage of the UV TOP Camera. The difference is obvious.

  • @LunaCognita Space dust

  • @LunaCognita it turned the structure into a giant fluro tube... the cable is long gone but certainly not a few days prior.. it is immedietly after it happened

  • @LunaCognita one of the sickest vids bro...

    thank you

  • @LunaCognita

    Wrong. NASA never said this was a UV camera. Only David Sereda did, and you lemmings followed him without doing a shred of proper research. I have footage of the UV 'TOP' camera, and the footage bears no resemblance. The mission and technical reports totally contradict any such theory to anyone with half a brain anyway. Proper study of the footage by anyone familiar with optics and the SIT Vidicon cameras used rules out silly theories of objects passing behind the tether.

  • @diddydee65 ok, lets say that it is bacteria, wouldnt bacteria in space be, i dunno life in space. just a thought but that is what they are looking for on the near planets and scientists would classify it as life.. so that would prove ALOT.

    but having said that, is a window a magic microscope? i dont think so, so looking out the window, even with a camera on zoom wont yield that result, you wont be able to see microscopic organisms .

    It could be dust,

  • @diddydee65 , Tap water and a piece of hair on a microscope slide is what I thought of immediately. 

  • @diddydee65 its NASA footage, i worked alot with micro-organisms and video, actually i was one of the first and wrote some handbooks. The ery-cell-like-white-object doesnt look like a micro-organism or cell, rather a macro-organism... The simularity however is that just like with micro-organism, it is not in our spectrum, these however seem above our spectrum instead of below...............

  • @diddydee65

    Moron 21?

    To the contrary, if you document these so called bacteria with your microscope making 90 DEGREE TURNS, and you'll earn a bloody Nobel Prize.

  • @diddydee65 Even if they were junk (bacteria) floating in space it would be pretty damn noteworthy to find life in a vacuum. Another important fact is that the tether gives you sense of depth, so these objects can't be on the lens, many of these objects change direction independent of the camera platform, impossible in space without some form of propulsion. Many of these objects appear to be perfectly symmetrical, another near impossibility in rock or asteroid formations.

  • @diddydee65 No, you are no moron. That is an interesting information, I always thought that this footage looks like a microscope recording, still I think it's genuine. But tell me, are those "junk bacteria" moving the same way, straight forward, fast, no jittering? Are they pulsating the same way too? I guess not.

  • THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK. MORE! 'MAKES ME FEEL LIKE THERE IS A SUPERFREEWAY OUT THERE AND WE LIVE ON A FLY-OVER WORLD. I BELIEVE THEY ARE PROBES/DRONES.

  • THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK. MORE! 'MAKES ME FEEL LIKE THERE IS A SUPERFREEWAY OUT THERE AND WE LIVE ON A FLY-OVER WORLD. I BELIEBVE THEY ARE PROBES/DRONES.

  • THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK. MORE!

  • What we perceive as "outer spce" or the abyss is FULL of living things, inviible to our eyes & existing in another part of the spectrum. These things are 'germs'- WORLDS of life on a macrocosmic scale. These objects strongly resemble C. Neoformans, a very common & overly abundant fungus. Perhaps life is here on Earth because it crashed or was brought here & evolved or was manipulated by other things, using fundamental germs of the FIFTH KINGDOM such as these.

  • You people should really watch " The Illuminati Deception" it will help A LOT !!!

  • Space junk would never change direction. I think this is rock solid proof that there is something out there - and it is not from this world!

  • @castorini "Space junk would never change direction"

    What about the camera that filmed the space junk, or the ship the camera was on?

  • underwater Filming planktons ore microbes.

  • This is the video that open my eyes a couple of years ago. truly amazing

  • The Objects in this video, Look at the FBI Files in the FBI Vault File is called UFO Picture from 1947 is EXACT SAME as what is in this video.

    See it here for yourself vault,fbi,gov/UFO

    PDF UFO file Part 1 of 16 ufo is on page 64

  • @awesome12u

    dude whats the exact link i cant access it it says error problem loading page

  • The Objects in this video, Look at the FBI Files in the FBI Vault File is called UFO Picture from 1947 is EXACT SAME as what is in this video.

    See it here for yourself

    PDF UFO file Part 1 of 16 ufo is on page 64

  • Awesome work on this video. Not that anyone can argue this anyway....but what you have done here is astounding, I can't believe no one else did this before.

  • obviously the covenant better start breeding spartans

  • dude ..your the best LOL thancks a lot man..! 

  • Absolutely GREAT JOB!!!

  • lunacognita awesome music choice:)

    adds to the vid lyk nething

    gr8 wrk

  • Oh come on, those are just weather balloons :))) You are all lunatics, I said weather balloons, WEATHER BALLOONS !!!

    Oh, no weather balloons? Well, then it's fake....it's fake, IT'S FAKE :)))))

  • @adrianfulop78 you are such a fool bud, those there? swamp gas reflecting off venus... (awesome footage)

  • @LowEndBCC no, it's ice crystals :)...and intelligent ones too

  • @adrianfulop78 omg shut up dang we get the dang point

  • "Hello, we're here and we're here to the infinite power." ~ Aliens

  • Maybe if the governments just told us about it then people wouldnt be so fuckin petty about the shit going on on earth and realize the bigger fuckin picture

  • "The USG purposefully does not release information to the public about the alien agenda because it would cause widespread panic and major societal disruption."

    Well "thanks to N.W.O(der) & friends, you're gonna have it a-n-y-w-a-y-s"............!

    Besides, "it's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that, we can't get enough of it"!

  • @crlwllns

    I would say "It's not that we can't handle the truth, they can't handle what we would do if we knew the truth as it unfolded"

    They like their security and through programming have conditioned the human populace to have a short attention span. They know that regular citizens would flip absolute shit on them and probably hang them for treason and the like, on the spot, wherever we found them, if we knew right away what they were doing to us.

    but, they let it leak out 35 years later

  • "The USG purposefully does not release information to the public about the alien agenda because it would cause widespread panic and major societal disruption."

    Well "thanks to N.W.O(der) & friends, you're gonna have it a-n-y-w-a-y-s"............!

    Besides, "it's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that, we can't get enough of it!"

  • @sandmanffm human arrogance.

  • I can't believe what i'm seeing, this is fantastic. Thanks a lot.

  • I watched Moon Rising and saw these objects that appeared to be on and/or hovering over the moon's surface.

    Many people say no ET's can reach us because of the distance between planets. I'd like to assert that the moon isn't far away at all...

  • Well done video thx for making it.

  • 20 dislikes = 20 closed minded morons

  • @michaelmruta I would say 20 open minded who are open to other theories rather than the one explained in this video.

  • @michaelmruta Insults widen the gap you wish to bridge.

  • if millions of people can honestly believe in the bible word for word, then i think it is ok to say i believe in aliens.

  • Favorited and 20 people don't like 'dust particles'....;)

    one of the best videos around...

  • Im not too far informed on this whole situation. Would someone kindly explain to me white rod type thing in the middle of the camera is? Is it just the broken tether from the very beginning of the video being followed by the camera? If so, why is it in a linear shape instead of the tangled mess shown at the 1:00 mark?

  • @hanzER00 if you watch at the 1.00 mark, you can see the tangled mass appearing to untangle itself.

  • @hanzER00 Because it straightened out again and as it is still moving through the ionosphere at 17,500 MPH it is still collecting electrons. It appears wide because it is glowing like a fluorescent tube for the same reason. A plasma sheath has formed around it. NASA has a 380 page report. The energy is what attracted the 'critters' in the first place :~D. Cool thing is the NAVY flew a tether at the same time, but theirs didn't break

  • AILIENEHNS!???????????

  • i dont understand the shit of this,dust flynig around in space and ppl believing it to be aliens or what?

  • @OZDE32 That dust has miles lol

  • @VourPT your sentence makes no sense

  • @OZDE32 The dust you mentioned is about a mile of length compared with the Tether.

  • @VourPT well it may not be dust, but that UFO is the same as the other flying stuff in the clip

  • This is the stupidest shit I've ever seen, if anyone believes this you really must be in the lowest percentile of intelligent people on Earth.

  • Way too heavy on the drums and weird sounds. Makes the whole idea of tracking anomalies in space seem overly dramatic when it should be straight science if we are ever to make sense of it all. I hate to" mute" on this one because of the informational blurbs buried between crescendos.

  • isn't it really strange that the religious amongst us claim these ufos are fallen angelsThe vatican recently made a public statement that Extra Terrestrials are part of gods creation and shouldn't contradict a belief in Catholicism. remember what the church did to Galileo. they killed people who said that the earth went around the sun.oops religious belief turned out to be wrong then as it is now.vatican trying not to make the same mistake i guess. getting ahead of the game this time

  • I have to say outstanding video. if there was ever a smoking gun this is it. all those people out there that claim ice crystals, airy discs etc etc take a good look at the velocity trails created by these objects. Take a look at the object flying behind the tether. airy discs dont come into focus when you zoom in quite the opposite. oh yeah and use your common sense any moron can see an object going behind the tether. love this video wonderful stuff.

  • Please tell the approximate size of objects on video and approximate it is long trajectories of their short flight? And the sizes of line in the middle of the screen of object of filming? Thanks

  • @MegaPypkin if you want to know check out a documentary called "the top secet nasa ufo films" with Martyn Stubbs and "Evidence The Case For Nasa UFOs" with David Sereda. On the documentaries you are told how long the tether is, how far away the space shuttle columbia is etc.... i think the tether is 81 nautical miles from columbia in the clip - David Sereda disects the footage really well in the documentary "Evidence The Case For Nasa UFOs"

  • @tvson12345678 You want to tell, removed video object on distance from the ship in 81 mile? I don't understand you... I want to know approximately, what size of moving objects approximately?! Thanks

  • @MegaPypkin In the film clip the tether is 12 miles long. some objects are behind tether - some are in front of tether. at least one object appears 1 mile in diameter.

  • @tvson12345678 Enormously!! The first impressions of viewing of this video that you look in a microscope - water! =)

    

  • @tvson12345678 David Serada claims the objects could be as wide as 4 miles!!

    He also states that the camera used by NASA is in UV indicating these objects are able to change their mass. without the camera, our eyes couldn't see the craft while they are in this state. changing their mass would allow them to travel and do impossible turns as seen in this video footage. The movie "men in black" might not be so far from the truth lol

  • MoNuckah your the one that childished your little human brain just dosent know anybetter

  • with estimated sizes of about a mile and a half in diameter...you'd think with all that 'debris' nasa might be a little worried about bumping into something...ya know, since clearly that 'debris' is not intelligently controlled and just randomly floating through the void...lol...welcome to the great ocean of life :)

  • An amazing bit of video, I applaud your work on this as the footage now only further proves some form of U.F.O. capable of altering its course and velocity in it. Not to say this is 100% concrete evidence of them being a supposed ship or living life form in and of itself.

    To those who think there's some kind of religious explaination to this, you can shove your bible up your ass front cover first. Your kind chose a life of falsity, so stay out of our true science. <.<

  • @oXZeroBeatXo Good call

  • to me they always look like living organisms , really big ones , cuz no gravity .

  • lol dose s anyone think that they can be demons falling angels that where with god when the unverse was created there for have so much knowledge that we as humans can even fantom and yes people would go crazy because the gov would say that there are friends that there hear to help us with are earthly problems !!!!!!!!!! raining in the take over of people hello people wake up

  • @wtf4688 People who believe in angels and demons are the reason the gub'mint has to keep a lid on it. They know you irrational dimwits will declare a jihad on aliens because it proves you wrong. Do us all a favor and stop believing in fairy tales. Reality is amazing enough to not need childish fantasies.

  • watch this video, it is really important, these things are not craft they are living entities.

    Bill Ryan Project Avalon Rulers of the World 1 January 2011 clip8

    this whole interview will make you numb with realization.

  • sandmanffm - so you think that this UFO phenomena is closely related to us Homosapiens , we are the reason for them to come here . They are Humans from another time dimension or humans from another Galaxy or another Star system , both parameters are almost equal . People or what ever become of these people who poses the mind much greater/older then the mind of ours , right ?

  • sandmanffm , debunked version might be right . Only one thing is left to do , to know 4sure , to kill the ambition :-)

    Get near ultra violet camera and try to replicate it myself . Have a good day man !

    by the way , why do you believe that UFO exist , what makes you think so ?

  • @sandmanffm I'm not sure what they are, but thanks for the explanation.

  • @sandmanffm  They explained the pulsating light on objects?