Mainstream media lacks accountability and I know a lot of us have reached out to these outlets and asked them to correct their pundit's biased conduct. Sadly they don't and most of us are left to the internet and places like Youtube to find valid information.
You'll never see Lawrence O'Donnell talking about the fact that Obama turned out to be a Bush-Clone and even worse. Lawrence O'Donnell is the real FRAUD. Just another Mainstream Media talking head Whore spewing lies and Propaganda.
ALL NEOCON GOP & OBAMA ARE THE SAME. They Love Wars & Permanent Detentions, They Love Burning US Constitution, They Love NDAA, SOPA, Patriot Act, FISA & Spying on Americans, They Love Torture, Killing families w/ Drones, Guantanamo & Drug War, They Love Corporate Bailouts & Subsidies, They Love Giving TRILLIONS to Pentagon & War Industry, They Love Zionists, AIPAC & sending Israel TRILLIONS, They Love Fed Reserve and WONT Audit it, They Love Fascism & they ALL take Bribes
This is just another disgusting blatant attempt to manipulate. Go home little boy your days of lies and hate are through. You are a pathetic excuse of a human due to your unbiased lies and hate of anything you can not comprehend or agree to.
Asshole O'donnell youre so in bed with Investment Bankers you bow everytime that your masters ask you to attack Ron Paul. Why dont you say the truth about how the monetary policy of this country really operates. Why dont you explain to your audience what is fractional reserve banking. RON PAUL 2012
He is worst than that he is an asshole O'donnell youre so in bed with Investment Bankers you bow everytime that your masters ask you to attack Ron Paul. Why dont you say the truth about how the monetary policy of this country really operates. Why dont you explain to your audience what is fractional reserve banking. RON PAUL 2012 !!
PROVEN FRAUD! The MEDIA LIES and they do it in a way to make Ron Paul look "unelectable".
Watch: (Jesse Benton: Ron Paul Is the Best Choice for the American People )[at 2:38] On the screen , in ONE shot , you see 50 Delegates ,when only 40 Exsist ,TOTAL from the 2 elections. And in Later Vids , they show Romney's Delegates number go even Higher.
Ignore JJpmfc. He is a challenged schill. I saw that interview when it happened and it was clear they said that to make Ron Paul "unelectable" ONCE again.
Like them showing Romney with 28 Delegates and Ron Paul with 3. You can grab ANY Vid and they will have MORE than the 40 Delegates Available , TOTAL ,from BOTH elections.
Watch (Jesse Benton: Ron Paul Is the Best Choice for the American People )[at 2:38] it shows 50 delegates in that shot. Only 40 Exsist PERIOD.
I took the time , unlike JJpmfc and looked for a vid that the thumbnail you can see they have Delegates Totals. The FIRST ONE I pulled up , showed 50 Delegates. As JJ Poinjts out , there are 40 available after the 2 Elections.
So TY for Proving my point. I will go with showing that their Totals are MORE than possible , because I can't leave it to people to Investigate for themselves.
@wyatt9688 I suggest you watch Lawrence O'Donnell's interview tonight with RP's senior advisor, who confirms what he says is true: Ron Paul is not really running for president, but instead is trying to push his ideas and eventually help his son possibly run for president in the future.
What got my attention and got me watching for this is. One show Started a Ron Paul piece and then asked for Tweets about paul. That tweet got there to fast and was to long , so I started watching what was said. Within 6 seconds the first tweet popped up and it was 27 words long. The tweets came NonStop and ALL were negative except 2 in the middle that were neutral.
I have NEVER seen anything to do with Paul and it not get flooded with his supporters? So it got my attention. I'm Awake now. Try it
I'm not 1 to speak on something unless I know as much as I'm able to learn. I have noticed that EVERYTIME Ron Paul is on a show , they have a Ticker , a tweet or some other little window displaying Negative info about paul. SO , when someone posts a Ron Paul vid and all the supporters watch it , they get bombarded with Negatives. I have researched the topic in depth and if you just open your eyes ,you will see it.
It's simple. Either Ron Paul gets the nomination and goes up against Obama, or Obama wins another 4 years. If any other candidate gets the nomination, one of 2 things will happen. Ron Paul runs as an independent and most likely Obama wins because of the split, or Ron Paul doesn't run as an independent and his supporters vote Obama in protest or votes independent. Either way, Obama wins. The best and only real choice is Ron Paul.
WOW! Mr. O'Donnell whatever you are smoking if you wanna keep smoking it legally you need to vote for Ron Paul! Democrats are SCARED of Ron Paul because he is one of the last of the conservative intellectuals. Ron Paul 2012
so heres what hes saying: discount the 25ish percent of the party that will only support paul. Really if you Discount that portion, and the election loses itself for the repubs. Fuck logic
The only reason huntsman was even in the poll that high is because of the fucked up stupid voters. Its the flavor of the month all over again. nobody gave a real damn about huntsman so they didnt really bother to attack him. just like santorm he is basically the last man standing. The only 2 people now are ron paul and mit. The media needs to get that in there head and we can all move forward.
and look , the real person comes out. Predictable. Your words and your attitude gave you away. You seem like most of the paid schills I come across , but they are smart enough not to ratlle my cage. Why do you think labeling and trying to fit "all Paul supporters" into 1 box will have any effect? The few people you influence are so asleep ,they would never have herd Pauls message anyway. BUT you fuel the "Paulists" to work even harder. Thanks
"Smart enough not to rattle your cage" ? WTF does that mean? Whaddya gonna do, make fun of me,? fuck off you pompous asshole. You clearly are getting a bit faith based with your support of Paul, and that's cool guy. Free country. You are free to be a total asshole, congrats. Go wack off to your Bible chump, I ain't interested and I vote. Go live your fantasy in whatever podunk whitebread Mayberry you're from. I am chuckling at you and your lack of perspective.
I think this o'donnel-long face-will have a stroke on air mentioning Ron Paul,but unfortunately the good doctor will not be around to resuscitate him ...lol
Ron Paul is defending Bain Capital,what's wrong with this people,this is another reason why this talking heads are a joke.Do a little bit of research and see that Paul is defending Romney in regards to health care and criticize him on Bain Capital.
@MrLovethyneighbor Comcast is the majority owner of NBCUniversal, and Lawrence O'Donnell is against the wars. Besides, he calls himself a socialist, not a communist.
PROOF the media uses subliminal messages and LIES to you to make you Think Ron Paul is Losing and UnElectable.
At :10 it starts showing "Delegates Total" Romney 16 Santo 11 Paul 5. This is the msnbc channel. On the CNN website ,it shows Romney with 12 Delegates Paul 10 TOTALS and those are After the elections is fully in. This vid was before they had the full count and they extend Romneys lead even Further. Paul has NEVER been in 3rd in Delegates.
I think O'Donnell was intemporate in his speech, but correct in his statement. The GOP will not give him his due, period. Ron Paul, the only honest guy in the race, isn't palatable to the powers that be. It is a sad statement about the USA when the only honest candidate is treated like this. Ron Paul ain't a magic bullet. I, frankly, don't want a dogmatic person running the show in dangerous times. Simplistic solutions ain't gonna cut it for our challenges.
So if it's not a complicated solution it can't work? LOL wow. You are good , use words that appear nice and like your not attacking Paul. But in reality you are supporting the Media Propaganda. Deal with my other post. Deal with the PROOF the media is Lieing to us. Look at the CNN reports. They show Romney with 3 times More Delagates than they show on their website. They Tag Paul with Untrue words like Unelectable , Legalize drugs , Isolationist , Racist ,all lies.
I'm not your enemy pal, but the Paulistas need to get a handle on the jerk attitudes toward ANYONE who doesn't agree. I agree, this media is pure crap, but that doesn't change the fact Ron Paul is simply not attractive to many, many voters by virtue of ACTUAL policy differences. The problem with being a zealot is that you turn people off, even when it would behoove you to be positive.
There you go using a catch word/phrase again. It's just me personally. I don't respect someone who Parrots. The only reason Ron Paul "is simply not attractive to many" is out of pure ignorance and Media Propaganda. I know , I use to think he was a Nut ,until I checked every fact for myself. When I am Played , I take it Personally. I will NOT be lied to again or Influenced by Propaganda and tricks. I keep my eyes wide open and I research for myself. Try it.
Screw you then. I'm sick of having all you goddamn pseudo intellectual Paulists dis everybody. I don't live in a podunk town with all white folks. That's Paul's demo, white folks from the middle class. He ain't sellin' here in Chicago, sorry dude, anyone defending property rights over civil rights ain't getting the minority vote, period. He is a principled guy and I appreciate his candor. I don't appreciate the asshat zealotry from those carrying his water.
People who disagree with you don't misunderstand, they just don't agree. His statements chap the asses of the historical victims of USA's racist bullshit. I fully understand his interpretation but disagree.
@Bunnicula71 I accept your position. I just like to remind, not to forget about todays racism of US politics vs muslims. Because the recent wars of aggression are incomparable to anything. Santorum Gingrich and Romney like these wars. They are the real racists.
@NerdARGyle999@Bunnicula71 I accept your position. I just like to remind, not to forget about todays racism of US politics vs muslims. Because the recent wars of aggression are incomparable to anything. Santorum Gingrich and Romney like these wars. They are the real racists.
@Bunnicula71 Hey there, I appreciate that you have policy differences. But I'd ask that you reflect on the assertion that Paul being "dogmatic" is a bad thing. Would you have a problem with someone that was "dogmatically" scientific? Could you elaborate on the scenarios that you are scared about? I think most of Dr Paul's policies actually avoid hard times for your country, but in counter intuitive ways.
@dmg46664 Ok, here's the deal, I see the world as an extremely complicated place, hinging on energy moving through some very sketchy pathways. I'm concerned that the "take our ball and go home" leaves an unintended vacuum, leading to regional conflicts around the world. The blowback of empire isn't going to be eliminated by a sudden change of tack, because the damage is done. Unwinding this is gonna be a bitch. I think all the candidates suck, and there is no hope for a good outcome.
@Bunnicula71 Disclaimer. I'm not American and live in Cape Town, South Africa. I fully acknowledge that there would be some regional unpleasantness by withdrawing from Iraq& Afghanistan. However, not be world destabilizing, and unlikely 2 be worse than before the US arrived in longrun. Troops in Germany&Japan can go home with no destabilizing effect. China would move into Taiwan, but a careful slow withdrawal would give them the same rights as HongKong. NonAmericans aren't helpless & incapable.
Don't waste your time with that guy. He told me Pauls solutions were to easy. So if something works , it dosn't work? and then he tells you that by correcting the problem , it will not end the problem. So he is suggesting to not fix it or keep going down the wrong path? The guy is , for a lack of a better word , an idiot.
@YouAreOneOfUs Patience man! Snapping at people (even if they are idiots) does not win you love or support! He might have meant that Paul's solutions "sound too easy".. but that he thinks the real world is 2 complex to apply them. I believe that Bunnicula suffers from a cognitive bias in which he paints the worst possible scenario in foreign policy which almost always never happens as follows:
tinyurl(.)com/6xhhyzx
You have to acquire some patience if you want to win people over to Ron Paul.
Worst case scenarios never happen eh? Pull my other leg, it plays jingle bells. And you are a sage how? I agree with your sentiment that you can't get flies with salt, but characterizing me as an "idiot" is just more salt. I'm an independent and you guys are just really, really showing how tiny your minds are by being jerks. It sounds great on paper guy, but so did communism. I have not used any derogatory terms like "Paultard" or the like, that's just juvenile.
@Bunnicula71 I never called you an idiot. I was generalizing about how the other commenter responds to people in general. Some of them may be idiots, but it was for his benefit to say even when he feels it to be the case, he needs restraint. Apologies for any misunderstanding. As for worst case scenarios... I never said they never happen... however they seldom happen. To date, Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate in any party to predict the housing bubble! 911, and the subsequent wars. Deserves credit
@Bunnicula71 Although it's difficult to demonstrate how worst case scenarios won't happen with foreign policy (although the lack of nuclear war is one such example). I thought I'd demonstrate the cognitive bias with Ron Paul's policies towards drugs. Many would think that decriminalization of hard drug policies in Portugal would end in disaster... but the equilibrium of unintended consequences prevail. tinyurl(.)com/7v92jma
@Bunnicula71 Taking the bowback rather than continuing an empire's mistakes is ofcourse better than continuing the wrong approach. Your ideas represent exactely the Status Quo.
@YouAreOneOfUs LOL Subliminal messages? You need to look up the delegate count and how they are counted. Ron Paul has always been 3rd in delegates during this race (Iowa/New Hampshire). If you actually take a few minutes to find out, there are some differences in the news networks projected delegate count.
Get a grip and stop thinking everything is a conspiracy against Ron Paul.
AMAZING that you didn't go look at the facts and you make a baseless accusation.
The ONLY place I could get a Delegates counts , after looking 2 hours , was on the CNN site. They show that the top 3 in Iowas got 7 delegates Each. Then in NH Romney got 5 and Paul got 3.
Totals are Romney 12 and Ron Paul 10 after 2 elections. Also , the reason you can't find an actual Delgate count is because it takes "3 weeks to confirm the votes" is what i have been told.
@YouAreOneOfUs Not quite. CNN is the outlier - Google: Wikipedia republican delegates, and click on the second link.
If you check out that link, you'll understand why MSNBC had those delegate numbers in the video, with the counting not yet finished. And, technically no one in Iowa got any delegates - they are considered "soft delegates", where they can vote for whomever they choose, so the news networks are making projections. Also, NYTimes has Paul at 3 currently.
And Romney would have had to win 100% of ALL Delegates in BOTH states to have the Numbers they showed he had. NOW , before you say that's what they did , as SOON as he has ALL the Delegates NOBODY Else can have any.
SO , to SHOW Romney with that many , they would have had to show the rest with ZERO.
@YouAreOneOfUs Iowa had 28 delegates and NH had 12. What part of this are YOU not getting?! No one has claimed Willard has 40 delegates or even 28 (the amount from Iowa).
So your telling me Romney got all 28 Iowa votes and Santorum got 11 of NH votes and that 1 vote left ,somehow turns into Ron Paul's 5 (at this point in the vid Ron has 5 and he ends up with even more). You never learned count did you? Also what I like , you gave out 3 votes in Iowa that are " 3 unpledged RNC delegates " .
EVERY Channel showed DIFFRENT Numbers. Who gave them the right to GUESS and tell us numbers that have NOT been Verified yet , so CAN'T be assigned yet. LET alone MORE than are available.
Also. Why did CNN list votes on thier site and then Show votes on TV COMPLETLY diffrent? They show a "Tie in Iowa" but on TV they show Romney Stompping Ron Paul. That's Misleading and they never changed their web numbers.
@YouAreOneOfUs I don't know what to tell you if you don't know basic electoral counting. I never said Romney got 28 Iowa votes - you were making the claim he had to have got them all. I suggest you re-read my previous responses or work on your reading comprehension skills. Lastly, the reason why they are able to project the delegates from Iowa is the voting totals from different areas. That generally shows who the delegates will vote for.
@YouAreOneOfUs Also, it's not a lie: what you are looking at (I'm assuming) is CNN's projection for the Iowa delegates, which they give 7 for Romney, Paul, Santorum each. That's your tie. The difference is what I stated already, with every other news organization projecting much lower delegates for RP.
So in your book. Showing 50 delegates awarded (very early on also , they give more to Romney later) and ONLY 40 are even Possible , that's not a lie ,in your book. LOL
Youtube vid: Jesse Benton: Ron Paul Is the Best Choice for the American People , at 2:38 , Bottom of the screen saying "Delegates to Date" Romney 23 Paul 10 Santo 8 Perry 4 Grinch 3 Hunt 2 , which is 50 Total , and they add more to Romney later.
@YouAreOneOfUs He is worst than that he is an asshole O'donnell youre so in bed with Investment Bankers you bow everytime that your masters ask you to attack Ron Paul. Why dont you say the truth about how the monetary policy of this country really operates. Why dont you explain to your audience what is fractional reserve banking. RON PAUL 2012
Wow, look at the righteous defender of individual liberties showing total intolerance for people's appearance. Yeah, it makes people take you VERY seriously.
Lawrence O'Donnel you disgust me. call yourself a journalist. saying a candidate doesnt count just because you say so, doesnt make it so. If you want to know why people vote for Ron Paul you need only look back at what you say. when you tell people that their vote doesnt count, it makes them more determind to see the candidate they vote for elected. In fact keep saying what you say. When you suggest that that people waste their votes on Ron Paul it will just increase his support!
and the reason I like to hear this sort of an argument (highlighting the inconsistencies of paul's domestic platform) as oppose to some other irrational smear is because it's not something trivial just for the sake of bashing the anti-war republican candidate.... It's a real rationed argument against him that frankly all progressives should seriously think about/consider not just immediately dismiss. That's my hope anyways.
I'm sorry but speaking as a progressive who has serious concerns about ron paul's domestic policies I'm actually really glad to hear that echoed on a mainstream media channel. I don't disagree with many of ron paul's foreign policy principles but I REALLY don't see how someone with so many frankly messed up domestic ideals are of so little concern to so many progressives... Anyways, I appreciate that you like paul moxy but thank you for posting this. Please post more about non-paul news. thanks!
@sylviasoven i absolutely agree, it is quite disappointing to see so many seemingly intelligent individuals blindly support a candidate who would advance so many exceedingly damaging domestic policies, take care
Aha ! They media talking heads just got a new memo.... now they claim "Paul is not there to win a nomination". the last memo was "talk about the newsletter" and the one before that "he is unelectable".
What a bunch of sold-out shameless whores. Sorry,that is actually offensive to whores.
STATE regulations! MUCH BETTER THAN FEDERAL regulations! Ron Paul/Buddy Roemer/Dennis Kucinich/Bernie Sanders ALL OF THESE MEN DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION! If you don't defend the Constitution of your Country you are a traitor and a domestic threat to our great Democratic Republic, OF the people, BY the people, and FOR the people... ALL OF US!
@jammustardj Why are they better? Please explain. Also, there is a little thing called "free speech", so people don't NEED to defend the constitution. It's not some divine thing. It was written by a select few men.
@garytcw Yes, exactly. If you don't believe in people free speech for people who you disagree with, you don't believe in free speech at all. Also, people may not "defend" the Constitution (whatever that means to you), but still be in favor of free speech. Demanding that people must defend the constitution is a meaningless statement, like "support the troops".
@JJpmfc Citizens United made corporations people and money = free speech. The constitution is being shredded. Wake up. I forgot to include Gary Johnson on that list. Why are they better? Just look at their records they don't flip flop and they stand up for others not just to line their own pockets.
@jammustardj Actually, the Supreme Court erroneously ruled corporations are people back in the 1800s. That was the basis for the bad Citizen United decision. Isn't Ron Paul against regulation? What I meant was who were you referring to as "they" denying RP 1st place, "they" take breath, "they" feel.
@JJpmfc wrong person dude. figure out your Youtube. anyway, if you look around the country Ron Paul are the only stickers and signs you really see. The MSM is owned by the banks which are owned by royal bloodlines which control most Western and Eastern nations mostly through corrupt money. Ron Paul wants to stop the coming collapse and dollar crash that will turn people on each-other. The system is coming down either way. You ain't getting anything new from anyone else!
Too many old people in this country. Ironic considering Paul's age. The old folks are just so afraid and reactionary. They can't think on their feet as it were and adapt to the circumstances we face as a nation this century economically and geo-politically.
ALL OUR ALLIED COUNTRIES are in support of Ron Paul. THE MAJORITY OF US TROOPS support Ron Paul. The truth is - THE MAJORITY OF AMERICA AND THE WORLD SUPPORTS Ron Paul. MSM telling lies like it is truth. Tisk tisk.
@inncntcrmnl Bill Gates doesn't believe in capitalism either. He'd prefer to monopolize and control the market. It's the reason why so many microsoft products are garbage--no competition is allowed. That's where government MUST regulate if society is to be free to choose what product suits them the best. Of course, some industries function as cabals and their sham competition is little more than a front.
@MinisterAilingTongue sorry, this is just BS and government propaganda. the anti-monopoly shit did not change anything, just wasted hundred millions of dollars for generating useless papers. What stopped Microsoft was free market - Apple and Google mainly. When government regulates anything, the regulated become lobbyists and then you complain about corruption. Just check the bios for FDA or any other regulatory agency
Wa-wa-wait a second! I'm probably going to vote for Ron Paul when the primary here starts. I'd never vote for Huntsman or Santorum. Do my principles mean nothing? Of course they mean nothing to others. Isn't that what the New Hampshire motto is about "Live Free or Die"? "Give me liberty or give me death" is wrong?
The "republican fraud" does have an agenda. It's reshaping the republican party. Nothing fraudulent about it. What amounts to dereliction in journalism is the rampant abuse of the English language on cable news.
So the argument against Paul now (and Nader in 2000) is that if they were NOT running then the race would be different. That's moronic. I have contempt for the idea that a vote is wasted for a candidate so long as the voter has used his brain in determining whom to vote for.
People are waking up and starting to understand history and economics ... the smarter people get and the more they wake up the more votes Ron paul gets. The elite want OBummer in place for a second term and Romney would absolute loose to Obummer, therefore Paul, with his anti-status Que / Pro freedom Platform will squash OBummer and they can't have that.
@LongueTiedNoLunger She only finds him interesting, like a comedian enjoys corruption so that they can have easy material. I don't think she wants him to win or anything and will in fact say things like 'he in unelectable'.
50% of those who identified themselves as democrats voted for Huntsman tonight, according to CNN's exit poll.
yes, Huntsman was the NWO.Wall St.banksters' idea of an astroturf indy RINO who talks 10% like the Doc by simply copying his pt. on exiting AfPak, while stating he'd have signed NDAA & keep rest of US Military empire abroad intact, all the whole copying rest of RINOS by maligning him by calling him "dangerous." not to mention, false flagging Manchurian Huntsman AD.
Shows you how Fox lies with the Ron Paul can't go against Obama. Ron Paul would pull a good percent of liberals and most independents. Romney would pull ZERO liberals and very few independents. Notice how well Ron Paul did in the liberal districts.
@JJpmfc they did their best to deny the 1st place. With second, they take breath. Look what starts happening if they feel Paul can get enough candidates....
MSM projected Ron Paul having less support. Of course when you fabricate the news. I wouldn't be surprised if the election is rigged to put Romney as presidential candidate.
lawrence o donnell is a fucking BIGOT. Whats his email ? everyone needs to spam this idiots inbox. How can you discount the second place winner and tell the American public the 3rd place winner is actually second. This is just beyond ridiculous.
The new talking point by the master at the top is ron paul is just getting his message out the and he's not looking to win this. Saw this same dig with gore.
So, Rick Perry, Mr. 1% of the vote IS a real candidate who will get the nomination? And Ron Paul, with 23% is a FRAUD???!!!! FUCK YOU, O'DONNELL!!!
All of those people are saying that Mitt Romney is going to win, which is the same as saying that none of them BUT Romney has a chance of winning, but ONLY Ron Paul is singled out as an unelectable "fraud" who can't get the nomination.
The media is working hard to set the narrative and give people a wrong impression about voting for Ron Paul. Romney is one of the 1% so all those occupiers and the very reason our country in this mess is because of people like Romney.
I want to smack odonnel in the face.
Ulciscor1 1 month ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is a fucking tool. Would somebody please cuntpunch him already?
432ps1 1 month ago
Lawrence O'Donnell... who do want me to vote for ?
hcwcars1 1 month ago 2
i knew that Ed Schultz and Al Shartpon are idiots but i always thought that Lawrence O'Donnel was both calm and fair - apperently he isn't either
wildhias 1 month ago
Mainstream media lacks accountability and I know a lot of us have reached out to these outlets and asked them to correct their pundit's biased conduct. Sadly they don't and most of us are left to the internet and places like Youtube to find valid information.
Jeredin13 1 month ago
You'll never see Lawrence O'Donnell talking about the fact that Obama turned out to be a Bush-Clone and even worse. Lawrence O'Donnell is the real FRAUD. Just another Mainstream Media talking head Whore spewing lies and Propaganda.
RON PAUL 2012 !!!
iCitiz3nP0vv3R2 1 month ago 5
RONPAUL=OUR ONLY CHOICE
ALL NEOCON GOP & OBAMA ARE THE SAME. They Love Wars & Permanent Detentions, They Love Burning US Constitution, They Love NDAA, SOPA, Patriot Act, FISA & Spying on Americans, They Love Torture, Killing families w/ Drones, Guantanamo & Drug War, They Love Corporate Bailouts & Subsidies, They Love Giving TRILLIONS to Pentagon & War Industry, They Love Zionists, AIPAC & sending Israel TRILLIONS, They Love Fed Reserve and WONT Audit it, They Love Fascism & they ALL take Bribes
iCitiz3nP0vv3R2 1 month ago
This is just another disgusting blatant attempt to manipulate. Go home little boy your days of lies and hate are through. You are a pathetic excuse of a human due to your unbiased lies and hate of anything you can not comprehend or agree to.
marksogmusic 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Asshole O'donnell youre so in bed with Investment Bankers you bow everytime that your masters ask you to attack Ron Paul. Why dont you say the truth about how the monetary policy of this country really operates. Why dont you explain to your audience what is fractional reserve banking. RON PAUL 2012
TheDaxindex 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He is worst than that he is an asshole O'donnell youre so in bed with Investment Bankers you bow everytime that your masters ask you to attack Ron Paul. Why dont you say the truth about how the monetary policy of this country really operates. Why dont you explain to your audience what is fractional reserve banking. RON PAUL 2012 !!
TheDaxindex 1 month ago
PROVEN FRAUD! The MEDIA LIES and they do it in a way to make Ron Paul look "unelectable".
Watch: (Jesse Benton: Ron Paul Is the Best Choice for the American People )[at 2:38] On the screen , in ONE shot , you see 50 Delegates ,when only 40 Exsist ,TOTAL from the 2 elections. And in Later Vids , they show Romney's Delegates number go even Higher.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@wyatt9688
Ignore JJpmfc. He is a challenged schill. I saw that interview when it happened and it was clear they said that to make Ron Paul "unelectable" ONCE again.
Like them showing Romney with 28 Delegates and Ron Paul with 3. You can grab ANY Vid and they will have MORE than the 40 Delegates Available , TOTAL ,from BOTH elections.
Watch (Jesse Benton: Ron Paul Is the Best Choice for the American People )[at 2:38] it shows 50 delegates in that shot. Only 40 Exsist PERIOD.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
I took the time , unlike JJpmfc and looked for a vid that the thumbnail you can see they have Delegates Totals. The FIRST ONE I pulled up , showed 50 Delegates. As JJ Poinjts out , there are 40 available after the 2 Elections.
So TY for Proving my point. I will go with showing that their Totals are MORE than possible , because I can't leave it to people to Investigate for themselves.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
that irish fag is just in denial of actual reality.
wyatt9688 1 month ago
@wyatt9688 I suggest you watch Lawrence O'Donnell's interview tonight with RP's senior advisor, who confirms what he says is true: Ron Paul is not really running for president, but instead is trying to push his ideas and eventually help his son possibly run for president in the future.
JJpmfc 1 month ago
What got my attention and got me watching for this is. One show Started a Ron Paul piece and then asked for Tweets about paul. That tweet got there to fast and was to long , so I started watching what was said. Within 6 seconds the first tweet popped up and it was 27 words long. The tweets came NonStop and ALL were negative except 2 in the middle that were neutral.
I have NEVER seen anything to do with Paul and it not get flooded with his supporters? So it got my attention. I'm Awake now. Try it
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
I'm not 1 to speak on something unless I know as much as I'm able to learn. I have noticed that EVERYTIME Ron Paul is on a show , they have a Ticker , a tweet or some other little window displaying Negative info about paul. SO , when someone posts a Ron Paul vid and all the supporters watch it , they get bombarded with Negatives. I have researched the topic in depth and if you just open your eyes ,you will see it.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is to the far left of his cousin Rosie.
Namso2010 1 month ago
I agree MSN is dead
DumbKitten1234 1 month ago
It's simple. Either Ron Paul gets the nomination and goes up against Obama, or Obama wins another 4 years. If any other candidate gets the nomination, one of 2 things will happen. Ron Paul runs as an independent and most likely Obama wins because of the split, or Ron Paul doesn't run as an independent and his supporters vote Obama in protest or votes independent. Either way, Obama wins. The best and only real choice is Ron Paul.
jamtiki 1 month ago
Why is he the best choice if Obama wins anyway? That's terrible logic.
NerdARGyle999 1 month ago
The media now has an agenda. Journalism is dead.
PonyUST 1 month ago
@ Bunnicula71
LOL
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
Wtf is wrong with that Maddow cunt? she always seems to be sniggering at something.
Cytacon 1 month ago
Shut your mouth dude. The people disagree
frkpyr 1 month ago
Do we, the people have the say too?
bc we want Ron Paul!
Astra2012 1 month ago
WOW! Mr. O'Donnell whatever you are smoking if you wanna keep smoking it legally you need to vote for Ron Paul! Democrats are SCARED of Ron Paul because he is one of the last of the conservative intellectuals. Ron Paul 2012
RockoML 1 month ago
so heres what hes saying: discount the 25ish percent of the party that will only support paul. Really if you Discount that portion, and the election loses itself for the repubs. Fuck logic
dthorste72 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We the Ron Paul people are wide awake and Do Not eat Lamestream Feedia Junkfood
katsfanman 1 month ago
Be nice guys! I think he's a little slooow.
wmalcom 1 month ago
The only reason huntsman was even in the poll that high is because of the fucked up stupid voters. Its the flavor of the month all over again. nobody gave a real damn about huntsman so they didnt really bother to attack him. just like santorm he is basically the last man standing. The only 2 people now are ron paul and mit. The media needs to get that in there head and we can all move forward.
TonPappa 1 month ago
@ Bunnicula
and look , the real person comes out. Predictable. Your words and your attitude gave you away. You seem like most of the paid schills I come across , but they are smart enough not to ratlle my cage. Why do you think labeling and trying to fit "all Paul supporters" into 1 box will have any effect? The few people you influence are so asleep ,they would never have herd Pauls message anyway. BUT you fuel the "Paulists" to work even harder. Thanks
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs
"Smart enough not to rattle your cage" ? WTF does that mean? Whaddya gonna do, make fun of me,? fuck off you pompous asshole. You clearly are getting a bit faith based with your support of Paul, and that's cool guy. Free country. You are free to be a total asshole, congrats. Go wack off to your Bible chump, I ain't interested and I vote. Go live your fantasy in whatever podunk whitebread Mayberry you're from. I am chuckling at you and your lack of perspective.
Bunnicula71 1 month ago
I think this o'donnel-long face-will have a stroke on air mentioning Ron Paul,but unfortunately the good doctor will not be around to resuscitate him ...lol
crocofanul 1 month ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is an admitted Socialist. watch?v=gxKd5lpZwLY
It would worry me if he supported Ron Paul.
JebBlack2010 1 month ago
Ron Paul is defending Bain Capital,what's wrong with this people,this is another reason why this talking heads are a joke.Do a little bit of research and see that Paul is defending Romney in regards to health care and criticize him on Bain Capital.
crocofanul 1 month ago
Ron Paul victory=end to illegal wars=end to GE=end to NBC propaganda=end to Communist scum Lawrence O'donnell's job
MrLovethyneighbor 1 month ago 6
@MrLovethyneighbor Comcast is the majority owner of NBCUniversal, and Lawrence O'Donnell is against the wars. Besides, he calls himself a socialist, not a communist.
JJpmfc 1 month ago
Obama 2012
tegab 1 month ago
@tegab lol. I get it.
VictorR8DR 1 month ago
Comment removed
MrLovethyneighbor 1 month ago
he's right. They can't have him up there saying what he says...THE TRUTH!
joeshcosmo 1 month ago
this is just fucking sickening. these people should be fired
Symbiotespider5 1 month ago 3
Just another corrupted political analyst.. SUCK IT MSNBC!!
rkrueger77 1 month ago
PROOF the media uses subliminal messages and LIES to you to make you Think Ron Paul is Losing and UnElectable.
At :10 it starts showing "Delegates Total" Romney 16 Santo 11 Paul 5. This is the msnbc channel. On the CNN website ,it shows Romney with 12 Delegates Paul 10 TOTALS and those are After the elections is fully in. This vid was before they had the full count and they extend Romneys lead even Further. Paul has NEVER been in 3rd in Delegates.
Funny the Fraudulent calling somebody a fraud.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago 13
@YouAreOneOfUs
I think O'Donnell was intemporate in his speech, but correct in his statement. The GOP will not give him his due, period. Ron Paul, the only honest guy in the race, isn't palatable to the powers that be. It is a sad statement about the USA when the only honest candidate is treated like this. Ron Paul ain't a magic bullet. I, frankly, don't want a dogmatic person running the show in dangerous times. Simplistic solutions ain't gonna cut it for our challenges.
Bunnicula71 1 month ago
@Bunnicula71
So if it's not a complicated solution it can't work? LOL wow. You are good , use words that appear nice and like your not attacking Paul. But in reality you are supporting the Media Propaganda. Deal with my other post. Deal with the PROOF the media is Lieing to us. Look at the CNN reports. They show Romney with 3 times More Delagates than they show on their website. They Tag Paul with Untrue words like Unelectable , Legalize drugs , Isolationist , Racist ,all lies.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs
I'm not your enemy pal, but the Paulistas need to get a handle on the jerk attitudes toward ANYONE who doesn't agree. I agree, this media is pure crap, but that doesn't change the fact Ron Paul is simply not attractive to many, many voters by virtue of ACTUAL policy differences. The problem with being a zealot is that you turn people off, even when it would behoove you to be positive.
Bunnicula71 1 month ago
@Bunnicula71
There you go using a catch word/phrase again. It's just me personally. I don't respect someone who Parrots. The only reason Ron Paul "is simply not attractive to many" is out of pure ignorance and Media Propaganda. I know , I use to think he was a Nut ,until I checked every fact for myself. When I am Played , I take it Personally. I will NOT be lied to again or Influenced by Propaganda and tricks. I keep my eyes wide open and I research for myself. Try it.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs
Screw you then. I'm sick of having all you goddamn pseudo intellectual Paulists dis everybody. I don't live in a podunk town with all white folks. That's Paul's demo, white folks from the middle class. He ain't sellin' here in Chicago, sorry dude, anyone defending property rights over civil rights ain't getting the minority vote, period. He is a principled guy and I appreciate his candor. I don't appreciate the asshat zealotry from those carrying his water.
Bunnicula71 1 month ago
@Bunnicula71 Civil Rights Act? You have not fully understood his interpretation (I believe) or you are trying to discredit. That's distraction.
Packgammon 1 month ago
@Packgammon
People who disagree with you don't misunderstand, they just don't agree. His statements chap the asses of the historical victims of USA's racist bullshit. I fully understand his interpretation but disagree.
Bunnicula71 1 month ago
@Bunnicula71 I accept your position. I just like to remind, not to forget about todays racism of US politics vs muslims. Because the recent wars of aggression are incomparable to anything. Santorum Gingrich and Romney like these wars. They are the real racists.
Packgammon 1 month ago
@Packgammon His interpretation is still racist.
NerdARGyle999 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NerdARGyle999 @Bunnicula71 I accept your position. I just like to remind, not to forget about todays racism of US politics vs muslims. Because the recent wars of aggression are incomparable to anything. Santorum Gingrich and Romney like these wars. They are the real racists.
Packgammon 1 month ago
@Bunnicula71 hi5
just stop arguing with these morons, they're not people who consider how others suffer unless it's painted as a horrible endeavor by Fox News.
NerdARGyle999 1 month ago
@Bunnicula71 Hey there, I appreciate that you have policy differences. But I'd ask that you reflect on the assertion that Paul being "dogmatic" is a bad thing. Would you have a problem with someone that was "dogmatically" scientific? Could you elaborate on the scenarios that you are scared about? I think most of Dr Paul's policies actually avoid hard times for your country, but in counter intuitive ways.
dmg46664 1 month ago
@dmg46664 Ok, here's the deal, I see the world as an extremely complicated place, hinging on energy moving through some very sketchy pathways. I'm concerned that the "take our ball and go home" leaves an unintended vacuum, leading to regional conflicts around the world. The blowback of empire isn't going to be eliminated by a sudden change of tack, because the damage is done. Unwinding this is gonna be a bitch. I think all the candidates suck, and there is no hope for a good outcome.
Bunnicula71 1 month ago
@Bunnicula71 Disclaimer. I'm not American and live in Cape Town, South Africa. I fully acknowledge that there would be some regional unpleasantness by withdrawing from Iraq& Afghanistan. However, not be world destabilizing, and unlikely 2 be worse than before the US arrived in longrun. Troops in Germany&Japan can go home with no destabilizing effect. China would move into Taiwan, but a careful slow withdrawal would give them the same rights as HongKong. NonAmericans aren't helpless & incapable.
dmg46664 1 month ago
@dmg46664
Don't waste your time with that guy. He told me Pauls solutions were to easy. So if something works , it dosn't work? and then he tells you that by correcting the problem , it will not end the problem. So he is suggesting to not fix it or keep going down the wrong path? The guy is , for a lack of a better word , an idiot.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs Patience man! Snapping at people (even if they are idiots) does not win you love or support! He might have meant that Paul's solutions "sound too easy".. but that he thinks the real world is 2 complex to apply them. I believe that Bunnicula suffers from a cognitive bias in which he paints the worst possible scenario in foreign policy which almost always never happens as follows:
tinyurl(.)com/6xhhyzx
You have to acquire some patience if you want to win people over to Ron Paul.
dmg46664 1 month ago
@dmg46664
Worst case scenarios never happen eh? Pull my other leg, it plays jingle bells. And you are a sage how? I agree with your sentiment that you can't get flies with salt, but characterizing me as an "idiot" is just more salt. I'm an independent and you guys are just really, really showing how tiny your minds are by being jerks. It sounds great on paper guy, but so did communism. I have not used any derogatory terms like "Paultard" or the like, that's just juvenile.
Bunnicula71 1 month ago
@Bunnicula71 I never called you an idiot. I was generalizing about how the other commenter responds to people in general. Some of them may be idiots, but it was for his benefit to say even when he feels it to be the case, he needs restraint. Apologies for any misunderstanding. As for worst case scenarios... I never said they never happen... however they seldom happen. To date, Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate in any party to predict the housing bubble! 911, and the subsequent wars. Deserves credit
dmg46664 1 month ago
@Bunnicula71 Although it's difficult to demonstrate how worst case scenarios won't happen with foreign policy (although the lack of nuclear war is one such example). I thought I'd demonstrate the cognitive bias with Ron Paul's policies towards drugs. Many would think that decriminalization of hard drug policies in Portugal would end in disaster... but the equilibrium of unintended consequences prevail. tinyurl(.)com/7v92jma
dmg46664 1 month ago
@Bunnicula71 Taking the bowback rather than continuing an empire's mistakes is ofcourse better than continuing the wrong approach. Your ideas represent exactely the Status Quo.
Packgammon 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs LOL Subliminal messages? You need to look up the delegate count and how they are counted. Ron Paul has always been 3rd in delegates during this race (Iowa/New Hampshire). If you actually take a few minutes to find out, there are some differences in the news networks projected delegate count.
Get a grip and stop thinking everything is a conspiracy against Ron Paul.
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@JJpmfc
AMAZING that you didn't go look at the facts and you make a baseless accusation.
The ONLY place I could get a Delegates counts , after looking 2 hours , was on the CNN site. They show that the top 3 in Iowas got 7 delegates Each. Then in NH Romney got 5 and Paul got 3.
Totals are Romney 12 and Ron Paul 10 after 2 elections. Also , the reason you can't find an actual Delgate count is because it takes "3 weeks to confirm the votes" is what i have been told.
I based on CNN #'s
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs Not quite. CNN is the outlier - Google: Wikipedia republican delegates, and click on the second link.
If you check out that link, you'll understand why MSNBC had those delegate numbers in the video, with the counting not yet finished. And, technically no one in Iowa got any delegates - they are considered "soft delegates", where they can vote for whomever they choose, so the news networks are making projections. Also, NYTimes has Paul at 3 currently.
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@JJpmfc
And Romney would have had to win 100% of ALL Delegates in BOTH states to have the Numbers they showed he had. NOW , before you say that's what they did , as SOON as he has ALL the Delegates NOBODY Else can have any.
SO , to SHOW Romney with that many , they would have had to show the rest with ZERO.
What part of this are you not getting?
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs Iowa had 28 delegates and NH had 12. What part of this are YOU not getting?! No one has claimed Willard has 40 delegates or even 28 (the amount from Iowa).
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@JJpmfc
So your telling me Romney got all 28 Iowa votes and Santorum got 11 of NH votes and that 1 vote left ,somehow turns into Ron Paul's 5 (at this point in the vid Ron has 5 and he ends up with even more). You never learned count did you? Also what I like , you gave out 3 votes in Iowa that are " 3 unpledged RNC delegates " .
I mean REALLY?
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@JJpmfc
Let me stop you before you repost again.
EVERY Channel showed DIFFRENT Numbers. Who gave them the right to GUESS and tell us numbers that have NOT been Verified yet , so CAN'T be assigned yet. LET alone MORE than are available.
Also. Why did CNN list votes on thier site and then Show votes on TV COMPLETLY diffrent? They show a "Tie in Iowa" but on TV they show Romney Stompping Ron Paul. That's Misleading and they never changed their web numbers.
That's a Lie in anyones book.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs I don't know what to tell you if you don't know basic electoral counting. I never said Romney got 28 Iowa votes - you were making the claim he had to have got them all. I suggest you re-read my previous responses or work on your reading comprehension skills. Lastly, the reason why they are able to project the delegates from Iowa is the voting totals from different areas. That generally shows who the delegates will vote for.
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs Also, it's not a lie: what you are looking at (I'm assuming) is CNN's projection for the Iowa delegates, which they give 7 for Romney, Paul, Santorum each. That's your tie. The difference is what I stated already, with every other news organization projecting much lower delegates for RP.
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@JJpmfc
So in your book. Showing 50 delegates awarded (very early on also , they give more to Romney later) and ONLY 40 are even Possible , that's not a lie ,in your book. LOL
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs Where are you getting 50 from?
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@JJpmfc
Youtube vid: Jesse Benton: Ron Paul Is the Best Choice for the American People , at 2:38 , Bottom of the screen saying "Delegates to Date" Romney 23 Paul 10 Santo 8 Perry 4 Grinch 3 Hunt 2 , which is 50 Total , and they add more to Romney later.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YouAreOneOfUs He is worst than that he is an asshole O'donnell youre so in bed with Investment Bankers you bow everytime that your masters ask you to attack Ron Paul. Why dont you say the truth about how the monetary policy of this country really operates. Why dont you explain to your audience what is fractional reserve banking. RON PAUL 2012
TheDaxindex 1 month ago
Wow, Perry has 191 relatives in New Hampshire. That's a lot!
xTheOxx 1 month ago
Romney is nothing but a stuck up, rich bitch, owned by the banks, snobby fuck. Rachael maddow is a smug, ugly azz man bitch thing.
SystemXpander 1 month ago 4
@SystemXpander
Wow, look at the righteous defender of individual liberties showing total intolerance for people's appearance. Yeah, it makes people take you VERY seriously.
xTheOxx 1 month ago
Well, lets try this again. I've been getting error message, try again on nearly every video I try to comment on..so let's see.
Boomer1949 1 month ago
@Boomer1949 I don't know what is up Moxy but sometimes it takes my comment and sometimes it doesn't. Weird.
Boomer1949 1 month ago
Go Ron Paul .
Presstitute Redsheild sellouts .
hopeintruth1 1 month ago
what a dickhead
in5d 1 month ago
Sharpton has absolutely no clue what he's talking about...just sad.
bundokman 1 month ago 2
Lawrence O'Donnel you disgust me. call yourself a journalist. saying a candidate doesnt count just because you say so, doesnt make it so. If you want to know why people vote for Ron Paul you need only look back at what you say. when you tell people that their vote doesnt count, it makes them more determind to see the candidate they vote for elected. In fact keep saying what you say. When you suggest that that people waste their votes on Ron Paul it will just increase his support!
Neilandreweyre 1 month ago
chuck todd, the ugly groundhog of msnbc.
dontfwithme2010 1 month ago
Quite a "liberal" use of poetic license I'd say...
The only fraud here is the narrative and reporting. The fact is, Rom Paul's first ad(s) took shots at Romeny as well as the others.
And for the record he was defending free- market capitalism, not Mitt Romney specifically.
hmfmi 1 month ago
O'Donnell needs to dive into a sea of AIDS jizz.
sporganmurloc 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
``O'Donnell needs to dive into a sea of AIDS jizz."
@sporganmurloc <--- This is the average education of a Ron Paul supporter.
FixedNewsChannel 1 month ago
4:55 "Which is why I don't that he is the so called left candidate in the race or the moderate that a lot say."
What the fuck is Al Sharpton even talking about? He sounds like a gigantic moron.
sporganmurloc 1 month ago
Lawrence O'Donnell needs a boot up the pooper
chindoo 1 month ago
and the reason I like to hear this sort of an argument (highlighting the inconsistencies of paul's domestic platform) as oppose to some other irrational smear is because it's not something trivial just for the sake of bashing the anti-war republican candidate.... It's a real rationed argument against him that frankly all progressives should seriously think about/consider not just immediately dismiss. That's my hope anyways.
sylviasoven 1 month ago
I'm sorry but speaking as a progressive who has serious concerns about ron paul's domestic policies I'm actually really glad to hear that echoed on a mainstream media channel. I don't disagree with many of ron paul's foreign policy principles but I REALLY don't see how someone with so many frankly messed up domestic ideals are of so little concern to so many progressives... Anyways, I appreciate that you like paul moxy but thank you for posting this. Please post more about non-paul news. thanks!
sylviasoven 1 month ago
@sylviasoven i absolutely agree, it is quite disappointing to see so many seemingly intelligent individuals blindly support a candidate who would advance so many exceedingly damaging domestic policies, take care
jeremyshambles 1 month ago
If mitt wins, i DEMAND that Ron paul will be the VP
judgen 1 month ago
More talking heads telling us what to think. Nothing new here.
danmcc22 1 month ago
Aha ! They media talking heads just got a new memo.... now they claim "Paul is not there to win a nomination". the last memo was "talk about the newsletter" and the one before that "he is unelectable".
What a bunch of sold-out shameless whores. Sorry,that is actually offensive to whores.
rtcell 1 month ago
STATE regulations! MUCH BETTER THAN FEDERAL regulations! Ron Paul/Buddy Roemer/Dennis Kucinich/Bernie Sanders ALL OF THESE MEN DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION! If you don't defend the Constitution of your Country you are a traitor and a domestic threat to our great Democratic Republic, OF the people, BY the people, and FOR the people... ALL OF US!
jammustardj 1 month ago
@jammustardj Why are they better? Please explain. Also, there is a little thing called "free speech", so people don't NEED to defend the constitution. It's not some divine thing. It was written by a select few men.
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@JJpmfc Also, there is a little thing called "free speech", so people don't NEED to defend the constitution...
So my free speech, like yours, is that we don't have to defense the constitution which protect free speech!
Spoiled brat.
garytcw 1 month ago
@garytcw Yes, exactly. If you don't believe in people free speech for people who you disagree with, you don't believe in free speech at all. Also, people may not "defend" the Constitution (whatever that means to you), but still be in favor of free speech. Demanding that people must defend the constitution is a meaningless statement, like "support the troops".
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@JJpmfc Citizens United made corporations people and money = free speech. The constitution is being shredded. Wake up. I forgot to include Gary Johnson on that list. Why are they better? Just look at their records they don't flip flop and they stand up for others not just to line their own pockets.
jammustardj 1 month ago
@jammustardj Actually, the Supreme Court erroneously ruled corporations are people back in the 1800s. That was the basis for the bad Citizen United decision. Isn't Ron Paul against regulation? What I meant was who were you referring to as "they" denying RP 1st place, "they" take breath, "they" feel.
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@JJpmfc wrong person dude. figure out your Youtube. anyway, if you look around the country Ron Paul are the only stickers and signs you really see. The MSM is owned by the banks which are owned by royal bloodlines which control most Western and Eastern nations mostly through corrupt money. Ron Paul wants to stop the coming collapse and dollar crash that will turn people on each-other. The system is coming down either way. You ain't getting anything new from anyone else!
jammustardj 1 month ago
Too many old people in this country. Ironic considering Paul's age. The old folks are just so afraid and reactionary. They can't think on their feet as it were and adapt to the circumstances we face as a nation this century economically and geo-politically.
MinisterAilingTongue 1 month ago
FUCK YOU LAWRENCE O'DONNELL
jammustardj 1 month ago
ALL OUR ALLIED COUNTRIES are in support of Ron Paul. THE MAJORITY OF US TROOPS support Ron Paul. The truth is - THE MAJORITY OF AMERICA AND THE WORLD SUPPORTS Ron Paul. MSM telling lies like it is truth. Tisk tisk.
jammustardj 1 month ago
If you take all of Ron Paul's voters and give them to Huntsman, he is a strong second place.
If you take all of Bill Gates' money and give it to me, I am a billionaire.
Iron-clad reasoning by those who believe in the redistribution of property to benefit a favored group.
inncntcrmnl 1 month ago
@inncntcrmnl Bill Gates doesn't believe in capitalism either. He'd prefer to monopolize and control the market. It's the reason why so many microsoft products are garbage--no competition is allowed. That's where government MUST regulate if society is to be free to choose what product suits them the best. Of course, some industries function as cabals and their sham competition is little more than a front.
MinisterAilingTongue 1 month ago
@MinisterAilingTongue sorry, this is just BS and government propaganda. the anti-monopoly shit did not change anything, just wasted hundred millions of dollars for generating useless papers. What stopped Microsoft was free market - Apple and Google mainly. When government regulates anything, the regulated become lobbyists and then you complain about corruption. Just check the bios for FDA or any other regulatory agency
rtcell 1 month ago
I guess the press wants a dollar thats worthless, wants a communistic country
wants another war.
send all the bias press to Iran, they can fight and report at the same time!!!
VOTE RON PAUL!
thomasjeffersoncry 1 month ago
FUCK you Lawrence. Suck it.
bamboo4tameshigiri 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wa-wa-wait a second! I'm probably going to vote for Ron Paul when the primary here starts. I'd never vote for Huntsman or Santorum. Do my principles mean nothing? Of course they mean nothing to others. Isn't that what the New Hampshire motto is about "Live Free or Die"? "Give me liberty or give me death" is wrong?
MinisterAilingTongue 1 month ago
Comment removed
MinisterAilingTongue 1 month ago
The "republican fraud" does have an agenda. It's reshaping the republican party. Nothing fraudulent about it. What amounts to dereliction in journalism is the rampant abuse of the English language on cable news.
MinisterAilingTongue 1 month ago
/watch?v=9W2yoCtqyaA
megamogx 1 month ago
Time to play the Mormon card boys. The fact that Romney was a 'bishop' in that abominable con job/cult needs some airing.
MinisterAilingTongue 1 month ago
So the argument against Paul now (and Nader in 2000) is that if they were NOT running then the race would be different. That's moronic. I have contempt for the idea that a vote is wasted for a candidate so long as the voter has used his brain in determining whom to vote for.
MinisterAilingTongue 1 month ago
I'm disappointed in New Hampshire republicans. I didn't think that was possible because I've never given a shit about New Hampshire.
MinisterAilingTongue 1 month ago
7:30 is where you'll find the bit about Ron Paul being a fraud
(you're welcome)
miketv 1 month ago
This is getting weird. Always saying "if Paul is a contender, then his opponent is by default the winner"!
MinisterAilingTongue 1 month ago
@MinisterAilingTongue Its called "fraudulent elections". They bought the GOP a long time ago. They do not care what the people want.
bamboo4tameshigiri 1 month ago
Seems to me All the other runners are frauds, ron is FOR REAL
robstuk1 1 month ago
Lawrence is such a douche
eydaimon 1 month ago
5"00 Sharpton your a tool. Who calls Paul a moderate of a leftist? -- dumb ass
prayfortruejustice 1 month ago
People are waking up and starting to understand history and economics ... the smarter people get and the more they wake up the more votes Ron paul gets. The elite want OBummer in place for a second term and Romney would absolute loose to Obummer, therefore Paul, with his anti-status Que / Pro freedom Platform will squash OBummer and they can't have that.
prayfortruejustice 1 month ago
If anyone other than Ron Paul wins the election, i'm moving to Vancouver.
fakeham 1 month ago
wtf?
ariosgraphics 1 month ago
MAN, you PaulTards just don't get it do you?
1980albatros 1 month ago in playlist war crimes
@1980albatros _Shelly
LilSpankey93 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012 or bust.
nesterisagod1776 1 month ago
HAHA! what a loser
1980albatros 1 month ago in playlist war crimes
why are the liberals on the network discussing conservative politics? just to bash it. more divide and conquer. their main strategy.
Justice4all311 1 month ago
Hey Media, were coming for you mother fuckers
TheEpoxyExpert 1 month ago
the admitted socialist Lawrence O'Donnell is terrified of a traditional constitutionalists president.
MedicalMarijuanaMini 1 month ago
On the positive side, Rachel Maddow was GREAT tonight talking up Ron Paul.....she's back on good terms with me!
LongueTiedNoLunger 1 month ago in playlist More videos from MOXNEWSd0tCOM
@LongueTiedNoLunger She only finds him interesting, like a comedian enjoys corruption so that they can have easy material. I don't think she wants him to win or anything and will in fact say things like 'he in unelectable'.
But otherwise, you are right :)
SwobyJ 1 month ago
Fuck you msnbc douchbags
TheEpoxyExpert 1 month ago
50% of those who identified themselves as democrats voted for Huntsman tonight, according to CNN's exit poll.
yes, Huntsman was the NWO.Wall St.banksters' idea of an astroturf indy RINO who talks 10% like the Doc by simply copying his pt. on exiting AfPak, while stating he'd have signed NDAA & keep rest of US Military empire abroad intact, all the whole copying rest of RINOS by maligning him by calling him "dangerous." not to mention, false flagging Manchurian Huntsman AD.
Huntsman=PURE evil.
RosenKrantz666 1 month ago
Lawrence O'Donnell is the fraud and cluesless.
Zooni2 1 month ago
Al Sharpton has no idea what hes talking about.
ohara3762 1 month ago
Obama may actully be Re-Elected. Just saying
RustArtRed 1 month ago in playlist Watch Later News vids
romney said "..you are the constitutionalist here.." because he couldn't answer that question about contraceptives. Fuck you chuck.
patrioticcow 1 month ago
HAHA what a loser =) I'd punch that dickhead in the face if I ever seen him in the street.
MaximumKahnage 1 month ago
Shows you how Fox lies with the Ron Paul can't go against Obama. Ron Paul would pull a good percent of liberals and most independents. Romney would pull ZERO liberals and very few independents. Notice how well Ron Paul did in the liberal districts.
Zooni2 1 month ago
@Zooni2 If it was rigged against RP, why would they even have him come in second place or anywhere near that? Get a grip.
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@JJpmfc they did their best to deny the 1st place. With second, they take breath. Look what starts happening if they feel Paul can get enough candidates....
rtcell 1 month ago
@rtcell Who's they? Get enough candidates?
JJpmfc 1 month ago
@JJpmfc whoever you were pointing to in "why would THEY even have this come in the second place".
rtcell 1 month ago
MSM projected Ron Paul having less support. Of course when you fabricate the news. I wouldn't be surprised if the election is rigged to put Romney as presidential candidate.
Zooni2 1 month ago
LOL @ trying to stop an idea whose time has come.
Newproducersradio 1 month ago
Who are the "Romney folks"? Give me a break the vote is totally rigged.
katards 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
••••••>> Okay, I have a question for all you smart people out there...
Assume for a moment that Ron Paul somehow manages to best all the other candidates in the Primaries.
Q1: Given the above hypothetical situation, if the Republican Convention fails to nominate Ron Paul what will reaction look like around the country?
Q2: Will it undermine the credibility of the Republican National Convention and the Republican party itself?
bee13zz 1 month ago
how is al sharpton still relevant? People really listen to his boring ass? i hate MSNBC as much as i hate FOX.
thekidofva 1 month ago
That bastard Huntsman...why doent he just drop out.
He is sucking away votes form Paul.
BachGuitar3 1 month ago
They don't want Ron Paul besting Obama and they know he can Romney can't and that's what they want..
Arperture2008 1 month ago
@Arperture2008 Who are "They"
CappitranoBellephant 1 month ago
@CappitranoBellephant ..MSNBC..
Arperture2008 1 month ago
GO RON!! Fk Lawrence.
Intervene 1 month ago
lawrence o donnell is a fucking BIGOT. Whats his email ? everyone needs to spam this idiots inbox. How can you discount the second place winner and tell the American public the 3rd place winner is actually second. This is just beyond ridiculous.
dipojones 1 month ago
Maddow is really mentioning rp a lot.
volumedealer1 1 month ago
The new talking point by the master at the top is ron paul is just getting his message out the and he's not looking to win this. Saw this same dig with gore.
volumedealer1 1 month ago
So, Rick Perry, Mr. 1% of the vote IS a real candidate who will get the nomination? And Ron Paul, with 23% is a FRAUD???!!!! FUCK YOU, O'DONNELL!!!
All of those people are saying that Mitt Romney is going to win, which is the same as saying that none of them BUT Romney has a chance of winning, but ONLY Ron Paul is singled out as an unelectable "fraud" who can't get the nomination.
MSNBC is a total disgrace!
KagarBeardtooth 1 month ago
The media is working hard to set the narrative and give people a wrong impression about voting for Ron Paul. Romney is one of the 1% so all those occupiers and the very reason our country in this mess is because of people like Romney.
SharkTheArdvark 1 month ago
Msnbcr he's no god you fucking moron,he just the right man to stop the wars and tyranny...you make stupid look easy.
volumedealer1 1 month ago