Added: 3 years ago
From: zennie62
Views: 11,976
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (144)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What's up with the top of his head?

  • He is a knot head isn't he. They're all jealous of Palin; she ROCKS!

  • These guys are so disrespectful on youtube. Good vid though her legs are quite a distraction.

  • Don't you just love the racists comments. I guess racism is here to stay... "we're not racist... blacks are just inferior... " Type in google ---sarah palin racist and look at what you find

  • UGLY BALD FREAK

  • that spook has a dorsal fin in his skull...... Yikes! Cheers

  • Good blog.

  • Sarah 2012!!!!

  • this vid make me think of something that may be good for wimmen to do. make it a law that all tv wimmen and politicle wimmen has to ware pant suits so as not to cause distrations. senetor hillery clinton has set a very good exampel for other wimmen

  • "Governor Palin knows that she's around guys who are straight and horny" - LOLZ!!!! True dat!!

    Don't forget "unhappy with their wives and can't wait to cheat"

    5 stars dude

  • as soon as i saw the swimsuit competition i searched it.thx

    i dont vote its a 1 party system.

  • Ok, I'm an Obama supporter and a Palin critic, but this video is pathetic.

    Everyone tries to play up their best features. If Palin's legs are one of her best features, then why shouldn't she show them off? If Americans are so stupid that they would vote for legs rather than virtues, values, intelligence, and credentials then they deserve the catastrophic consequences of superficiality.

    Believe it or not, some voters may actually be interested in voting for the right candidate.

  • Palin doesn't take the pictures or videos, the media does. We don't need to put Burkas on our women because you can't control yourselves.

    Are we supposed to cover up men's butts with a robe because gay men get horny?

    Just control yourself. Come on, you can do it.

  • what happend to your head bud? somebody thumped you on the noggin with a 2x4 didnt they? what the hells wrong with people today? all this violence!

  • Yeah, I see that too. His head is a trapezoid

  • she's a whore just like her daughter, you can see how she conducts herself or ryeyefucks guys, its blatant,which is why her daughter leanred wrong

  • Obama's mom is a whore to then.

  • Palin just said that she would make use of this flexibility and become an active member of the Legislature.

    This is nothing new here as many VPs in our history have also been very active in their role as President Of the Senate.

  • Molstad and ggullet- You boys are so busy arguing ephemeral questions that THE ONLY RELEVANT issue IS NOW TOTALLY ELUDING YOU.  Is the self-annointed Messiah qualified for the presidency? His associates are terrorists (Ayers), his cohorts are felons (Rezko); what are his actual accomplishments (name one), his mentor is an anti-American lunatic (Wright),and his spouse hate the U.S. What are the Obamanation's SOLUTIONS (name one!)--Can he think, or just read David Axelrod scribblings off prompter?

  • so derzwerk,

    Shall I put you down as "undecided" then?

  • NICE!

  • I'm sick of Palin using her sex appeal to get over. Like flirting with world leaders and the winking during the debate, it's sickening - thanks McSame! As a woman, I know that it's very easy to be sidetracked with flattery, to use your sex appeal to get what you want and to disarm men when the going gets tough BUT it's un-professional. I don't agree w/Condie's politics, but she handles herself in a way that demands respect-she uses her intelligence instead of her legs.

  • There is a YouTube video by the member named "riceforpresident" that shows an interview of Condie by Katie Couric

    As you watch the video you do sort of notice how both showed up in short skirts to show off their great legs and do seem to aim them at each other...

  • Happy 50th Alan! that's funny about Condie and Couric - I have to check it out, lol.

  • Hey Zennie, I was trying to pay attention to your rant but had to check out that Sarah Palin bathing suit video. WOW! Nice legs...uhhhh, what were you talking about?

  • great, interesting video! thanks for sharing

  • Hey man these little blogs your doing is getting rediculios your are accusing SP of wearing a skirt on perpous to catch the eye of other high people. She wears skirts that go passed or right below the knee cap and always keeps her self in a buisness and professional manner. Man you need help big time and Zennie to try and bash her casue of she wears a skrit man try and do some really studing before putting up stupid and mindless so called "Blog Report". Just saying.

  • Zennie, Your reaching very deep,

    Most fans of SP are fans because of what she accomplished in ridding her state of corruption. Her stance as a true conservative, Her belief in the US Constitution. The fact that she's pretty is not lost on any of us, but I'm sure, most 'guys' are'nt going to vote Pub based on SP's looks. I hate to say it, because you may Del it, but I must, People will vote PUB to prevent skyrocket taxation, Socialism, and the down right Marxism that Sen Obama will surley bring

  • Nice analysis!

  • We watched the debate with a a hundred million people that were Mccain supporters and half way through the debate they all decided Obamma was their man.

  • Zennie, It has been almost 24 hours after the debate. I thought you would be on this.

  • We watched the debate with a friend and his wife that are Obama supporters

    At first they acted a lot like they were at a football game and their team was winning

    However once the debate got going the mood of the room changed for my friends

    They acted a lot like the game was not turning out the way they had wanted

    Did they start to have some affection for Sarah that they didnt expect?

    Maybe the 1st Republican Feminist they had seen? It left them a bit off balanced

  • Great video Zennie, and I love the point you make about showing respect to elected officials. It would be great if some of those officials who don't already, followed your advice on that subject.

    Happy Belated Birthday Ms. Abraham.

  • actually it's imagining whats at the end of those long legs that really excites us, and after 5 kids i imagine those are the legs to nowhere. "you betcha maverick joe six pack"

  • Hmmm, I'm not done watching the VP debate yet, but Palin has repeatedly refused to answer questions and has used absurd framing dozens of times already, and many came back in a damning way.

    I suppose that could be seen as 'not making mistakes' in that she didn't say 'i'll get back to you on that' or the familiar Palin style disjointed run-on.

    On the other hand even an uncommitted use of informal logic makes most of her arguments look disingenuous to an extreme.

  • Remember OlordOkinboteO, she was speaking to the Republican base last night.

    Not to liberals or to Dems, just the Republican base.

    This was very important for her pass this test with them due to the errors McCain has made in the last 2 weeks concerning the banking bailout.

    In many ways both Biden and Palin did well and now shine bright within their own Party,

    Except that Sarah now shines a bit brighter.

  • "This was very important for her pass this test with them due to the errors McCain (AND Sarah Palin) have [Sic] made."

    But I don't believed she "passed" anything. Merely memorizing answers to softball questions could've been done by any prepared person with a B.A. (which Palin posesses) however Palin didn't reveal any depth to the substance of her intellect so we don't know what she really thinks. It's lame-brained to vote for her just cause she "seems" friendly, and nice.

  • I think you misunderstand her goal in the debate

    She was not there to reveal anything

    or to win any votes

    The ONLY goal she had was to bring "reassurance" about herself to the Republican base.

    It was to Republicans that she did play to.

    And play well she did!

    Given the fact that she has never been in the spotlight like this before, I say she is a good clutch hitter

  • "I think you misunderstand her goal in the debate"

    OMG Who R U responding 2? Jesus Christ! I KNOW what Palin was supposed to do and her responses were NOT reassuring. They were canned and formulaic or she was NON-Responsive altogether. She made MAJOR factual errors. At time blatantly lying.

    Only dimwitted Pubic Hairicans are reassured merely because she didn't spontaneously combust.

  • "and her responses were NOT reassuring"

    Not reassuring to the Republican base?

    I totally disagree

    Clearly she aimed her answers to be heard by the Republican base and I think she hit her target well.

    The events in the news over the last week (the 700 billion bailout) have really ticked off a lot of Republicans at McCain and it fell to Gov Palin to stop the slide And I think she has

  • "Not reassuring to the Republican base?

    I totally disagree"

    Yes of course you disagree, because you are too DUMB to actually respond to my complete comment which reads:

    "Only dimwitted Pubic Hairicans (Republicans) are reassured merely because she didn't spontaneously combust."

    Now don't reply to me cause you are a MAJOR waste of time and I have more interesting things to do.

  • "Yes of course you disagree, because you are too DUMB to actually respond to my complete comment"

    You want me to respond to the idea that Gov Sarah Palin might catch on fire during the debate?

    Ok....I'll give it a shot...

    I say no chance of that happening, given the fire suppression system in place at the time

  • 'You want me to respond to the idea that Gov Sarah Palin might catch on fire during the debate?

    Ok....I'll give it a shot...

    I say no chance of that happening, given the fire suppression system in place at the time '

    JESUS CHRIST !!!! IT WAS A FUCKING METAPHOR YOU GODDAMN UNEDUCATED HICK!

    WILL YOU STOP RESPONDING TO MY COMMENTS BECAUSE YOU ARE A COMPLETE MORON!

  • Well, lezxotic you sure told me!

    But if you are going to insist on using words like- "METAPHOR' then I'm going to need to find my thesaurus too...

  • "...and was hard to watch."

    So Zennie, (in keeping with this video's topic), are you are saying that the debate podium covered up too much?

  • Gov Palin also did what she needed to do, and that was to stop "the slide"

    She didnt screw up!

    And that alone is a real victory for McCain.

    Had she screwed up this election would be all over. "All over" because the actions of McCain in this bailout deal have once again "stabbed in the back" Republican ideals.

    Truly all Sarah has to be from now on is "Not McCain" to Republicans and she will do fine.

  • it is my belief that anyone (including gov palin)who happens to end up in the oval office will not allow america to be taken over by communist, radical islamist or any other ideology. what really gave me concern last night was her proclamation of willingness and desire to blur the lines of the branches of government. that should be unacceptable to all americans.

  • "...willingness and desire to blur the lines of the branches of government..."

    ggullet,

    CSPAN has the whole debate posted here on YouTube.

    It's one of the longest videos I have watched.

    There are also many other YouTubers with the debate posted cut up into smaller blocks to watch.

    I also would like to see the part of Gov palin's answer that you have a concern about.

    If you have time, please point me to the place where she blurs the lines of goverment.

  • her answer about the role of the vp

  • Ok, I will try to find the spot.

    and see what you might be concerned about.

    Can you tell me what you remember of her answer?

  • ggullet...

    I watched CSPAN video and I found the section you must have in mind.

    NOW LISTEN TO THIS!

    Gov Palin is correct in everything she said!

    However everything Biden said is wrong!

    Biden talks about "Artical One" of the Constitution and says thats the VP is "Exective branch" - WRONG!

    Biden said "The primary role of the VP is to support the President" - WRONG!

    Lastly Biden said that "the VP only presides over Senate in case of a tie" - WRONG!

  • Artical One Section Three of the Constitution deals with the " Legislative Branch" of Goverment and this is where the Vice President is given the duty of President of the Senate.

    So VP is covered under this LEGISLATIVE section of the Law...Not the Exective!

    Biden does not seem to know what a VP does?

  • Biden seems to have a fundamental misunderstanding as to the role given the Vice president by the Constitution.

    He didnt know the VP is a Legislative office?

    The VP receives the same pension as other members of Congress based on his position as President of the Senate

  • Alan why so defensive? Biden can be wrong from a to z on the subject thats not my point. just like Palin was answering questions nobody asked you skip over my point and go straight to attack mode. anybody in the judicial, legislative,or executive branch that feels they should have more "constitutional" influence over another branch other than what is already given concerns me. but thats just me.

  • ggullet

    I think you should think about what you are saying one more time.

    The correct answer is that each part of Goverment should ONLY be interested in it's "Constitutional influence" over the other branches of Goverment!

    Thats why we have this type of Goverment with checks and balances writen into the Constitution.

    Gov Palin spoke the correct answer in that the office of the VP is seen as a member of the legislative branch under our Law.

  • In the debate, Biden disagreed with the idea that the office of the Vice president is to be seen as free from the influence of the Executive branch. But a reading of Artical One Section Three of the Constitution shows Joe is in error.

    Go GOOGLE it!

  • "Biden can be wrong from a to z on the subject..."

    Ggullet, if the subject is: "The role of the VP under the Constitution"

    And if Biden wants to be the next VP, I would rather on this subject he is not wrong from A to Z...

    Someone should hand Joe a copy of the Law and point out to him some of the things connected to the job he is running for.

  • and ggullet,

    Not defensive Im just attempting to point out that Palin did answer the question about the role of the VP in the correct manner

    In fact it was Biden that was totally in error here

    His answer contained 3 huge errors about the role of the VP as writen in our Constitution

    Palin only said that she would make use of the duties and freedoms given the VP under the Law

    That was the correct answer

  • again you totally gloss over my point. are you being purposely obtuse? palin said she would like to see to legislative branch give more flexibility to the vp to promote the executive branchs' agenda. that's my point either address it or ignore it, don't just change the subject to fit your argument. everyone knows the role of the vp is to be second banana. unless of course you happen to be dick cheney

  • ggullet,

    I need to send you the address to the YouTube video Im looking at so as to be sure it is also what you are looking at.

    I need to make sure you and I are debateing the same remarks of Palin?

    If we are, then from what im hearing from her is very correct with what the Constitution says in black and white.

  • ggullet

    Gov Palin does not say "she would like to see to legislative branch give more flexibility to the vp"

    Rather what she really says is that "the Constitution " gives the office of the Vice Pres a lot of flexibility as to how each VP fulfills that office.

    And about this she is correct!

  • from the YouTube video I sent you a link to: you can see that Palin said that she would like to use this flexibility that the Founding Fathers gave the office of VP within the Constitution in order to promote the agenda of the President.

    Her statements are all correct and well within the Constitution

  • Also, Palin and Dick Cheney are correct in that the Executive Branch of Goverment (The President) does NOT hold complete sway over the office of the Vice President

    The President is part of the Executive Branch of Gov

    The Vice President is part of the Legislative branch of Gov

  • ("everyone knows the role of the vp is to be second banana")

    The role of the VP is set out for us in Artical 1 Section 3 of the US Constitution.

    There is nothing in the Law about that role being "second banana" to any other position in Goverment.

  • the vp's main role is to succeed the president in case he is unable to fulfill his or her obligation as president (second banana). what flexibility? the vp's role in the senate is clearly laid out. he or she shall be president of the senate but have no vote unless it is to break a tie. no vote means no voice

  • The Flexibility talked about by Palin is connected with the fact that the Constitution does not say very much as to how the VP carries out his role as President of the Senate.

    Palin is correct in that each VP we have had could more or less deicide for themselves how busy they would be with the Senate

  • if by flexible you mean they can either preside fairly over the senate or use their power to promote their administrations agenda over the senate, then i guess you are right. i just dont see any flexibility in doing the right thing,which to me is being fair.

  • again, Im talking about what Palin was pointing to in the debate.

    You have watched the debate video right?

    (I sent you link)

    In the debate video she clearly is just talking about the Constitution.

    The Flex found within the Law gives each VP the abnility to work with the Senate all the time, or never once show up there at all.

    The VP sorta sets his own hours as to if he wants to be active or just sit around.

    Palin wants to be active in the Senate

  • she specifically said she would use the "flexibility" to promote her administrations agenda. this is the very reason some framers of the constitution refused to sign.just because it's in the constitution don't make it right.loopholes in law are used by lawyers to defend or prosecute to the best of their ability. they should not be used by elected officials to promote their own agenda.thats not country first,thats the cheney doctrine i know whats best for you whether you agree or not.

  • "just because it's in the constitution don't make it right"

    Clearly we disagree totally on that point.

  • so you believe the dred scott decision was right.

  • ("should not be used by elected officials to promote their own agenda")

    Actually an elected official gets elected because of the support amoung voters for his agenda.

    So it is the DUTY of every elected official TO PROMOTE the same agenda he ran on

    The trouble comes when People promise one agenda when running for office and then govern with a different agenda (ie Bush lower taxes less gov spending)

  • that's fine, but when you distort rules of order to sway things your way that's not fair.

  • ggullet.

    Sarah Palin was only talking about the freedom given the Vice President under the Constitution in connection with the position of President of the Senate and as a member of the Legislature.

    As with any other member of the Legislature, the VP gets to vote (during a tie), and by the use of this vote pass or kill bills.

    The VP has every right to use this vote to push the agenda of the President if he wants to.

  • The actual question asked of Palin dealt with the views of Cheney that the Vice President is not under the control of the Pres

    Palin agress with Cheney on this point

    They are correct here

  • The VP is a member of the legislature and it would "blend" the 2 branches of Gov if the VP were to be under the full control of the Pres.

  • While there is flexibility in the Constitution on this matter there is no ability of the President to boss around the VP under our Law at all

    The VP can chose to be an active President of the Senate and work to push an agenda of the President

    or he can chose to stay home.

    The President can't fire him no matter what

  • alan. you are all over the place.your post are starting to look like sarah palins responses to questions. your's and anybody else with reasonable intelligences' defense of gov. palin is starting to smell of cynicism

  • ("alan. you are all over the place")

    I believe I sent you the link to the debate video, I believe as well that everything I have writen is supported by that video.

    If there is some point I have made here that is not supported by the video just let me know.

  • Im more or less neutral on the VP debate.

    If I were to sit dwn and "score" the debate then Biden won

    But Im also leaning in the direction of Palin due to the fact she had the most to lose.

    She deserves some credit for her presentation

    However I think Gov Palin's answer on the question of "The Role Of The Vice Pres" is the only correct answer supported by the Constitution.

  • "cynicism"?

    Well if I do have any of that, it's that too many people tend to not want to know what the Law states compared to what Biden believes Or that too many seem to wish to paint Palin to look bad with stories that have nothing to do with this election

    (her child, her daughter's boyfriend, her 2nd place finish in Mis Alaska)

  • I also believe that too many people said at first "Children are off limits"

    Then they turn around and went against this the very first moment they got wind of an anti-Palin story about her daughter.

    To me many actions of YouTubers went against my views of Right And Wrong

    I so I felt pushed to speak up to defend Palin's right to right to privacy.

  • ggullet , If I have writen anything that is not supported by the debate video or by the Constitution then it falls to you to point this error out to me

    Im not at all offended by such efforts to correct me when I have goofed something up

    If I have writen many things that are just my "point of view" too, of such we can debate their merit.

    But I dont believe Im defending Palin.

    I am defending my view of what is Right and what is Wrong.

    I deem many attacks against Palin as wrong

  • ggullet, a question for you

    When you wrote -

    ("just because it's in the constitution") So you now believe that what Palin was talking about is actually the way the Constitution is writen?

    I have been saying for a while the Joe was totally wrong in his answer here about the Law.

  • In the debate, Biden suggested that the office of the Vice President is part of the Executive branch of Goverment.

    He tried to back this up by listing Artical 1 of the Constitution.

    But if you read Artical 1 sec 3 you find something else...

  • Palin was asked if she agreed with VP Cheney that the office of the VP is not under the complte sway of the Executive Branch?

    Palin said she did agree with Cheney due to the flexibility found in the Constitution as to how the VP fulfills his role as President Of The Senate

  • Biden was in error when he said that the Vice president only presided over the Senate in case of a tie.

    Biden was also in error when he said that under Artical 1 of the Constitution that the Vice President was set up as part of the Executive Branch

  • Do I think Palin won the debate?

    No

    But I do think we should look a bit more closely at this error about the position of the VP that Biden makes.

    I also think Palin surprised a lot of Dems with how good she was.

    And because she came into this with the most to lose, she actually gets the edge here in the final judgement of the debate

  • The VP also gets to vote whenever there is a tie, and when you think about it, thats about the only time it actually is important to vote anyway.

    The vote of the VP carries the great weight it does in that his one vote will pass or kill the bill before the Senate...

    Thats why Biden was in error in the debate on this point.

  • Well the VP debate is history!

    Both sides did very well in the debate.

    I cant think of any reason to say one side won or the other lost.

    Both Sarah and Joe did 'no harm" to thier tickets.

    Both can claim that they did what they came to do.

    So what did they each come to do?...

  • Joe came into this just have another debate like normal.

    Joe has been in these things before

    He knows how to handle himself

    He knows how to stay on message.

    His job was to just hang in there and allow Gov Palin to self distruct.

    If Gov Palin does self distruct?

    Then the election is over

    If she doesn't?

    Then it's back to Obama or McCain to win the rest of this election on their own.

  • Gov Palin came into this with a very odd mission.

    She aimed to show the entire human civilation that she is not a complete moron.

    Even the smallest mistake would be pounced on by the liberal media.

    Her every glance, every word, every mannerism must reflect the image she seeks to deliver.

    Her final goal is to bring "reassurance" about herself to the Republican base

    So how did they do?

  • Joe could have phoned-in his appearance, it was that easy for him.

    Joe has done this before many times and it shows.

    Joe was never in trouble, never challenged, never really in a "debate"

    Joe allowed every chance for Gov Palin to fail.

    He moved the conversation with his answers to places where he wanted Palin to go.

    He didnt give the performance of his life, but it was right on the mark for the night.

    A Career politcian

    Debates are what they do

  • i watched the today show for the same reason.

  • zennie62,

    The VP debate is about to start!

    Now I hope you have a new blog to view on the morning?

    (lets all try to watch without getting too turned on by Sarah's legs)

  • Zennie, are you serious that you've been there(Bohemian Grove)? Cause I know that there is documented video of what they call their "Cremation of Care"(on youtube)where they sacrifice a effigy(hopefully) of a child & burn that. Also there are news stories in the New York post about the gay porn stars (google:Gay Porn Stars Service Moguls). Not that I am against gays,but that is the type of 'anything' goes attitude that goes on there involving some of the elite that run policy in this country.

  • You've been to Bohemian Grove?? Where the elite have mock(?) human sacrifices, engage in Satanic Rituals, and bring in bus loads of male porn stars for God knows what reason(use your imagination)??? Nah, you seem like too nice a guy to engage in those activities.

    There is a Youtube video about Bohemian Grove btw..it's called something like "Dark Secret of Bohemian Grove" or something.

  • im a democrat and want obama to win it but man palin is hott

  • Yeah, she is hot..but then again so is Pam Anderson -- and I'm sure you wouldn't want her for President.

  • "wow this is all the dirt you can get on her?"

    OMG don't you watch the news?

  • McCain-Palin withdraws from Michigan. This

    allows Obama-Biden to deploy resources in other key states with 32 days left, McCain

    may also be forced to abandon other keys

    states. Let the rout begin. Truth talks and

    Rebpulican B.S. walks. What a magnificent

    candidate Senator Obama is. Look out for

    more Repub. Tricks and voter fraud.

  • Firstly, quit being a smartass.

    Secondly, I don't know how many skirted hotties he's interviewed in his life and I don't care. I've been in journalistic positions myself interviewing attractive women in sometimes alluring clothing, and I've always held my cool about it.

    Charlie Gibson I would hope has at least the same amount of professionalism that I've had in amateur journalism. If he doesn't, or isn't expected to, it's pathetic.

  • LOL..NO Zennie, I wasn't coming on to you..I was trying to hit on lezxotic. Not sure of the skirt wearing hotties that Gibson interviewed. But speaking of "skirt wearing hotties" have you seen Fox News channel lately? There is nothing there BUT supermodels in mini-skirt showing endless gams - pushing propaganda!

  • Kissinger likes to attend Bohemian Grove(google it). So I don't know how much he appreciates Palins admittedly nice legs.

    The important thing to remember is while we are mesmerized by Palins Legs. Hypnotized by Barracks speeches. Captivated by McCains image as a world hero(??)..(and then theres Biden). ALL these characters are pushing the 700 billion dollar Wall Street bailout. Which shows to me they are NOT for the average US citizen. Google infowars prisonplanet - educate yourself today!

  • Well it could be argued that it's sexist because you are objectifying Palin my logic is spun from a purely sociological perspective.

    Many women DO think Barack Obama is handsome and swoon. The same thing happened with Bill Clinton but men won't report in a way that objectifies other men out of fear of being labeled a Homosexual.

  • Apparently you have a lot to learn about the female anatomy Zennie. Women actually use either hand but many prefer something that can provide at least 400 vibrations per minute. How's that for an implication!

    Males can't gives us that OUCH.

  • apparently you don't know the human anatomy.

    pleasure starts and ends in the brain. think about it.

  • Call me baby. I can do much better than 400

  • "Call me baby. I can do much better than 400 "

    I was being rather "conservative" in my guestimation as not to make you feel bad but in reality it's more around 1500 VPM (vibrations per minute).

  • "I was being rather "conservative" in my guestimation as not to make you feel bad but in reality it's more around 1500 VPM (vibrations per minute)."

    1500 VPM'S!!!! FORGET IT THEN!! I am not Robo-"####"(censored but rhymes with dock as in shipping) - lol

  • "FORGET IT THEN!! I am not Robo-"####"(censored but rhymes with dock as in shipping) - lol "

    Why do you think many women HAVE these devices? LOL exactly for the VPM's.

  • But those devices are so lifeless and cold. I have a organic energy that can't be duplicated by a machine(smile). Besides all sexual enjoyment really comes from inside your brain .. your body just sends the signals to your brain where the pleasure is created and sent back. I am such a sexual dynamo I could have u hot without laying a finger on you --- GRRRRRRR!

  • But they get the job done and don't fall alseep leaving the womaN unsatisfied. Plus if you have to brag about being a SEXUAL DYNAMO IT MEANS YOUR REPERTOIRE IN LIMITED TO "IN/OUT" YAWN.

  • Well we(guys) do do a lot of the work. So it can be tiresome. But a good lover always gets the job done first - then catches some ZZZ's.

    BTW.I am definitely NOT an "IN and OUT" type of guy. Foreplay is very important and helps to build the satisfaction of the eventual intercourse act. Kissing, touching, & holding are vital(for me at least)for the enjoyment of the sexual act. But that being said..I still would consider myself to be "SEXUAL DYNAMITE!"

    (don't knock it till your tried it)

  • Alright, fair enough. I'll clarify. Skirts are worn with suits all the time in business scenarios.  She happens to prefer skirts, and in the summer, stockings are pretty much optional.

    To suggest that she's choosing her fashion with vindictive reasoning when the fashion is sociologically accepted is stretching it. It becomes obvious that you're looking for something negative.

    Charlie Gibson is a professional enough journalist to have interviewed several skirt-wearing hotties and be fine.

  • seems like everybody's so busy politicing nothing political ever gets done

  • Well Zennie, sex does sell, racism is alive and thriving, and most people react to others on a base animal level before anything else....

    Sad isn't it?

  • You're confusing intellect with a persistent cultural conservatism you express - in point of fact, my take is very analytical. A truly smart person does not know the bounds you present. It's why the Bay Area is a leader in technical innovation-- and where I live -- people here challenge and test the bounds of culture to see and learn.

    ---------

    That makes me want to visit the west lol!

  • Zennie

    The next time Palin gives a woody don't Vlog it. TMI.

  • I gotta say zennie until this video i NEVER thought about that once. After this video tho i can remeber myself looking at her legs in almost any interview and thinking wow his legs are hot or so smooth lol. I know i'm incriminating myself lol but hey i'm being real.

    DanteCWB, if your gonna unsubscribe just do it man don;t threaten zennie. I think he went a bit deeper than needed but it was totally in the lanes imo. I think what you just said about Barack speak enough for you. i won't press on.

  • she's just trying to get a "leg up" in politics. like zz topp said "shes got legs and knows how to use them"

  • Palin is vulgar. I don't fall for attractive people or persuasive body language. I have a much more cerebral criteria for attraction.

    When I see center-left folks criticizing her interviews as rambling bimbo talk I cringe. It seems much more cynical. It appears as if she assumes the audience is highly irrational and gullible, willing to take any point that can be remembered. It works on loyalists and extremists no doubt, but looks sinister from here.

  • "It appears as if she assumes the audience is highly irrational and gullible, willing to take any point that can be remembered."

    Aren't they? Do you live near the coast because research has shown that those who live near large bodies of water tend to be more rational and logical in thinking.

  • This is pretty sexist.

    If anyone said in the beginning of this fiasco of an election that Barack Obama was distracting people with his blackness (which he was clearly doing) there'd be an outrage.

    This is the first time I've noticed her legs, and McCain plays with his wedding band ALL THE TIME. Look at other video footage of him when he's standing around. Always messing with that ring finger.

    This is by far your worst video and i'm considering unsubscribing for it. Don't do this bullshit.

  • I guess because I am not smart and can't see and learn, I just think that there are issues about her that are more interesting and disturbing than the basely sexual. I mean unless I heard you wrong, you think that voters will be swayed because she wears skirts & seasoned journalists like Charles Gibson will not be able to conduct interviews with her without being aroused to the point of distraction. It is laughable but it got my attention which as you said is what you wanted.

  • But aren't you putting Sarah Palin into a little box and calling her a temptress, considering her choice of clothing, which has always been elegant and tasteful on TV, a ploy to "distract voters and journalists with her legs..."? That bothers me on so many levels. What is your ploy in your choice of hairstyles? Wear a hat or risk being distracting your viewers with your cleanly shaven head... LOL

  • Yes, she was still adressing millions of men. One woman at the scene.

  • You're hilarious Zennie I like how rational your judgment is.

  • I am thinking but I am doing more thinking about your sanity than her motives for dressing like a business woman. She wants to look feminine and tough. I don't think that many many men are distracted by her legs. Maybe you are because you might need a little more to do. But I think your Vlog is very interesting. I just had to mention that this was somewhat below the intellect you seem to have.

  • The Couric interview she wore black trousers.

  • Zennie she distracts YOU with her legs this is the firsty time I've noticed her legs. Same thing with the beauty pageant video. Now the people uploading and re-uploading these videos are for ther most part are dumb ass teenage boys.

    Women don't think with the little head not even lesbians, you need to get it together guys women are getting sick of your dumb shit.

  • C'mon Zennie...LOL. Palin distracting voters and journalists with her legs???

    That's like saying Barack Obama is distracting voters and journalists with his good looks and nice smile.

  • most ladies cross at the ankle

  • In many corporate jobs, it would be unacceptable that the skirt comes above the knee. I don't really agree with that standard though. What I'm worried about is the fact that she is to expect to meet foreign leaders from countries who are used to women covering up. She obviously didn't give any thought to this when she picked her outfits for these meetings. This may cause those leaders to take her or Americans in general less seriously.

  • She shoulda worn a burkah... and no panties.

  • HA HA, you're silly!  I mean it would've been more appropriate for her to wear dress slacks or a skirt below the knees for meetings with foreign leaders. She should look like an executive because she wants us to accept her executive experience and business casual doesn't cut it.

  • Me? Silly? Nah!

    Seriously, world leaders have to be worldly. There is business appropriate for women that doesn't make them women in a men's clothes.

    Yes, one has to be culturally sensitive. So, don't serve pork at a Jewish or Muslim state dinner. But there are some of these fanatics who find just talking to a woman an insult is their problem. Certainly a reason to go to war or behead or crucify.

  • Darn! Now you've gone and revealed the secret weapon that straight women in business and politics have known since the middle of the Women's Movement: show some skin girl! LOL! Females who earn a living selling cars or things that men typically buy are often told to make themselves look soft and feminine. Anyway, great observation Zennie!

  • That is retarded. Please don't insult yourself with that kind of stuff. Please go back to the hard hitting reporting you usually do.

  • Honestly i can't can people behind a woman who clearly shows she isn't that intelligent enough to be a vp. Im curious how can people vote someone who isn't much more intelligent than them in office seriously look at all her interviews. Even Hannity was gave her the retarded face.

  • I don't know why someone feels it necessary to mark this as spam.

  • Zennie good one and I saw your video with CNN. Nevertheless she is an attractive lady and that can't be denied but still if that is all it takes to meet world leaders count me in LOL. I thought Diane Sawyer had the best legs.

  • Have a feeling the abs are gone. She always covers the belly.

  • She had five children and it would be unprofessional for her to have her belly showing.

  • Oh, come on. A belly shirt and short shorts will take this election to a new level.

  • "She had five children and it would be unprofessional for her to have her belly showing. "

    NO it would be unprofessional because she is running for Vice President fool.

  • Oh?

  • It's obvious you don't understand sarcasm.

  • Happy Birthda Zennie's "Mom" He does us

    proud too!!

  • Legs sucks

  • I might be wrong, but I'm never seen a leg suck. Now, a mouth, ok.

  • You know Im a big fan Zennie but Come on Cleatus!!! You reaching on this one dawg. Her utter lack of knowledge concerning international affairs, her views on global warming, and everything else she doenst know counteract any benefit she might gain for being attractive. (Beside she is not all that)

    However I give you credit for swinging hard LOL

    You should play for the Mets with that swing LMAO

  • shes nothing but a flirt and empty suit i ve been saying these for a long time now.

  • I didn't even know she had legs - You're mind is obviously places mine is not. lol

  • Happy Birthday Mom!

    I just turned 50 myself yesterday!

  • Zennie, I hadn't even thought about this, but then again I'm female. I won't argue that it isn't true, but since so many men I know argue about the issues and have never commented on her physicality I suppose the tactic has had only limited success.

    I think Couric did herself - and the American people - proud with her intelligent questions and professional demeanor.

    Happy Birthday to Zennie's mom! You raised a great kid!

  • lmao That was the last thing I was expecting to see. Well I wouldn't say that it's her legs specifically but her 'persona' as a whole that distracts. We've heard the 'naughty librarian' the 'milf' and other terms used to describe her. Which is to be expected considering that's why she was granted the position on the ticket at such short notice. It is easier for a nation to forget a person's short comings if they are good looking.

    Basically McCain wasn't pretty enough on his own.

  • Senator Clinton "owns" the pant suite, and girls dont like to copy each other. Im sure Sen Clinton would love to try a dress too but she's stuck with what she has got in the closet and mirror

  • Holy Smoke....LOL....

    I always wake up in the morning and check on what you have on your mind today Zennie?

    But a girl's legs?

    Thats today's topic?

    Ummm...you got to be kidding right?

    I dont know Z-man...to me it's just starting to seem kinda like a "Sarah-fixation" you got here...LOL

    I think I should just say, "Fine" and move back onto some type of political topic.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more