it looks like a torpedo/ bomb like thing, i watched another couple of videos in the past and a object like the one that we are focusing on in the video was somehow attached to the bottom of the aircraft that struck the south tower. mabey im wrong but could it be possible that this object in this video could be the same object that was attached to the plane???? correct me if im wrong
The object is the remains of the stairwell,usually construtced of poured cement or cinder blocks because a stairwell must be fireproof . I have seen the stairwells built before the frame is installed in several mid rise building in my area. This video also shows good views of the remaining vertical core columns before their collapse,notice that the floors and trusses have fallen away and the beams are beginning to sway.Your video disproves the "fell at free fall speed" argument.
is it the bottom half of the antenna that was on the roof after all it was outside and could not have been totally destroyed by the explosions inside the building
watch?v=8OL6PmVJZhI here is another video showing possibly the pulverizing smoke event we see here. It seems to be a section of the inner core, opposite to the remaining core we see on the right
@IExposeMormonism The "watch." I left above isn't working, it takes you to a google site. type in September 11th 2001 WTC Falls? WNBC Dub 10 04. the account is "911crasting". It is at least interesting
@DannyBruiz LOL!!! Love the sarcastic tone!! If anything these idiots deserve even more of it!!!. My whole take on these Truther videos?. You have the right to post it and i have the right to make fun of it.
Well, it seems to be stepped in construction with a distinct peak. It is covered in dust like everything else even though the entire event is only seconds old. There are two distinct bright spots on the bottom and many such spots around the base perimeter. I'm thinking, after many views, it is part of the elevator shaft system. It was part of the core. It had this shape +/-. And whatever is going on here is way past conventional explosives!
new video this is fake the steel girders weren't there after the collapse what a joke FUCK OFF disinfo CUNT.For the people who want to see the real collapses dont click on anything that says NEW.Technolgy come quiet some way in ten years especially in video,camera,computer sectors so dont let some little PRICK munipulate footage and believe him
Well we could deliberate for the rest of our lives on what exactly that might be - but in a nutshell, it's part of the building. It matters not which bit from which face or floor.
What matters is that we all know it was brought down by thermate explosives used as part of a demolition process, masquerading as a terrorist attack to win the hearts of congress, so that funding would be made available to wage a war on Iraq.
For the size and density it looks to me like a remnant of the core. It would appear to be intact because of the girders running through it.It may well have been the only object that obeyed the law of conservation of momentum by actually staying intact.
if i look at 1:36 it looks like a peace of a rocket or nose of the plane on the others it looks more like peace of the front wall becous i see those paterns in thare but maby i think to muth i hope you guys find out the truth peace from belgium
to me it looks like a statue in the higher elevation pictures.. reminds me of the statue of mary mother of Jesus with its shape and circular base..Don't get me wrong I'm not saying it is just resembles the shape closely..in the first couple of shots it just looks like a wall falling over if that can be seen in the first 2 shots
I see an EXplosion with the first two main towers, not an IMplosion. I see these buildings exploding upwards and outwards from the top down. I cannot see any mechanism other than planted explosive devices causing this type of damage and behavior. With WTC7, I see it coming down in very much a classical demolition style. There are differences between how the larger towers were destroyed and WTC7, but I see all three as managed demolitions. Plane crashes cannot account for it.
@garciarosa100 hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! its really funny how i realise how long man has been evolving for and your comment shows that the human brain has not fully evolved at this stage! ;)
At minute 1:20 we see its base. There are two bright flashes. You can see many small bursts around the outer diameter. I found a cleaner version of this and it is very clear in that picture. So, what has a circular base that was accessible? It must be 5+stories tall. It is part of the core area. It could be a collection of the elevator services. But when I see dust I now think concrete. But I find no evidence the core had concrete. So, I'm not convinced it is concrete/core. But it is real.
theres alot of other facts that point the finger at the government...ive done alot of research and even asked top conspiracy groups questions that they didnt respond to. questions like "what if the government had to do it because of the future oil shortage?" its a scary thought but IF the government did it ..they did becuz they had to and ofcouse making money in the process wouldnt bother them. they DID make alot of money. GB is still laffing all the way to the bank.
At 1:18 we see a circular base tilting over. We see a shadow under the base. But I also see a ring of small bright spots which I think are Explosives, like the one we see at 2:30 on the base of "it", towards center. The only things looking like this foaming gray is the concrete being pulverized. But by what? What turns 200,000 tons of concrete into little rocks..
@krayzeejojo , i agree it just looks like a chuck of white looking wall, if you look at the shots, you notice theres a 3D look to it, you can see the darker face of the chuck of wall, which is facing the camera on one of the shots, IMO its just some wall falling over.
You are correct in expecting to see asymmetrical "collapse", given that the damage from the planes was also asymmetrical. However, your statement that "there wasnt many collumns holding the tops up" fails to address the unique design characteristics of the Twin Towers. The "net" of perimeter columns were designed to transfer loads from above AROUND weakened areas in exactly this type of damage from jetliners. The buildings were literally designed to SUSTAIN this type of damage without failure.
It certainly wasn't a piece that was immediately destroyed due to it's obvious massive size. I personally do not see this segment as anything mechanical in form. By all visual estimates I can make, it appears to be a large section of concrete and my 2nd video (see the side bar for link) attempts to explain how I believe this all fits into the 9/11 tragedy.
ya ok ...thank you for replying...some one needs to get to the bottom of if......i think the answers will bring life changing answers........spiritually,politicaly,just alaround life changing
Result of years of inside jobs coming from the Clinton Administration. Please see Clinton's reaction when confronted by the truth movement. How dare you question 911. Wow! And he is a democrat.
i say that it is a section of perimeter columns being ejected away with massive amounts of heat induced ablation trailing off it. look at photos of the ground zero so-called debris pile and realize that almost all of the 47 massive core columns simply disappeared.
only vaporization could cause their disappearance and only a very very great heat source could cause vaporization of steel.
@jamesha175: Thanks for your comments. I don't disagree with your overall assessment. Much of the WTC contents and materials simply evaporated or was pulverized into fine particulates. However, this particular section appears to have distinct edges that maintain their structure until later in the destruction sequence when it begins to disintegrate. I do not see this section being made of steel columns. It appears to be a massive monolithic structure in my estimation.
i saw your previous comment re: that oddity being a chunk of core concrete - i can't dispute that but i do recall seeing a photo of both towers with the sun (morning or evening?) shining thru them, and we could actually see all the way thru - and it seemed to me that there was no concrete core. sorry but i have no link to that photo.
anyway, it would take a very very great heat source to destroy any concrete to the minute dust that was in evidence.
it looks to me like the concrete walls, perhaps the outer wall, the concrete did emit alot of smoke all of it did, in fact the inner core thats to the left vapoizes to dust just as it starts to fall
I have another video that answers the question I've asked in this one which has already been out for some time now. See the comments for the URL. But the short answer is that I believe this to be a very large section of a reinforced concrete core wall. This is significant because all public information about the central cores touts the steel column design and completely avoids any mention of significant use of concrete which really is a challenge to the "fire melts steel core" story.
@FreshKillsJustice Yes, I saw it. If it is at ground level, it must be. But it also must be from the core because "The Spire" is the NE corner of the WTC. And your object is inside that corner. Your object helps confirm "The Spire" is not part of the core..
GodSpeed2012 has an excellent quality video to work from. I don't know what it is exactly but it appears to be related to the inner load bearing walls. There is another piece of wall (?) falling almost laterally and behind this object. Perhaps it wall with marble attached. All the concrete is being pulverized in front of us. It's hard to keep that in mind
One phenomenon I keep seeing is the "smoke" trailing from the falling debris chunks.However, when you observe it a bit more closely, it seems to be that these pieces of debris are actually EMITTING these smoke trails as if they are disintegrating on the way down, rather than just residue blowing off.There's just too much of it to be a residue, at least in my estimation. It's like the debris is dissolving in mid air, which seems very much in line with the overall destruction.
@FreshKillsJustice Yes. All the streaming smoke is the concrete flooring. But the concrete was poured into steel pans, 10x60ft and 4" deep, I think. It's a stunning thought. And like "they" say; "The largest piece the largest piece I've seen is half of a phone key pad, no desks, no computers, nothing". In the past few months I have realized just how absent chunks of concrete are in the rubble. The largest I have seen is perhaps 100lbs!
i believe that the nano thermite was pianted on most if not all of the concrete, remeber they had acess to every other floor, so they could have painted the underneath and outer walls on each of those floors
@Mastirshake Even painting it on is a big deal. But they did do something like that. Floor by floor. It hard to fathom that we are watching a "Foaming Concrete WTC". And I don't think 20% of the public is aware of this or wants to deal with it. So far all I have done is upset people and they Refuse to look at it!!
it sounds weird but it looks like the remains of an fa-22 fighting raptor and its still pretty much intact compare actual photos, either that or a triangular top section of the roof,im confused. cant explain
in english it calls "The WALL" I guess... wall - a part of building. iam crying everytime I'm watching this movies... sad very hard experience for all my life
The World Trade Center construction was 100 percent documented by video crews. To see the buildings being built, and to get up close to the true architecture, all you would have to do is to watch the fim "Man on Wire" by James Marsh. Video footage of the construction of the towers shows that the biggest marvel of the world, the heighth of technological prowess and power at that time was such a vast undertaking that the whole thing was shot in high definition film of the times.
Well, that is partially correct. I have watched all the "available" footage of the construction. Yet, I find the portions that photograph the core structures always focuses on the upper most sections under current construction. Christoper Brown alleges that the actual concrete core pours were taking place seven or eight stories below the upper deck at any given time. He alleges there was another video aired by PBS which has now been removed from their records which shows much more.
If 9/11 was an inside job or not the 2 planes which hit the pentagon and the second to hit one of the towers could have been prevented it could have been shot down if it doesn't land and don't tell me that Innocent people were on da plane cuz wasn't the thousands of people who were in the WTC innocent 2? noing dat either way innocent people will die wouldn't it be better if less people die then 3k?
We were led to believe that the towers were constructed primarily of large steel core columns and that little or no structural concrete was used. What you see is, in my opinion, a massive section of a steel-reinforced concrete sheer wall that is part of the REAL central core construction. The official story relies heavily on the public accepting the "fire weakened the steel columns" garbage that NIST and FEMA have shoveled for the last 8 years. These towers did not "fall"...they were exploded.
Why would a concreate shear wall being demo'ed create that irregular shape?
RDX and Composition demolition charges are made to cut at critical load bearing points in the steel structure, and they notoriously produce Square debris.
Doubt me? Go look at online Las Vegas Casino implosions, some of which I worked on, and see if any irregular portions like what you point out, exist.
The explanation given by Christoper Brown on his website made sense to me. He says there was a halt in the concrete pour which left some of the explosive materials used on the rebar exposed to the weather, likely rendering it faulty at detonation time. Other demo circuits below and adjacent to this particular section finished the job. But before you begin to defame me on this, please realize that we do NOT have all the pieces to the 9/11 puzzle. This is why we need a NEW REAL investigation.
There are several problems with discussing the specifics. First, there are very few real demo experts qualified to do so. That is where the shills love to come in with their pseudo-knowledge and try to discredit honest folks who are truly searching for the truth. The FACT IS...we do not know everything about 9/11...but we DO know enough to confidently conclude the previous 9/11 Commision (non) Investigation was a complete whitewash and MUST be reopened without oversight from possible perps.
Please see my other video which fully explains what I believe this object/material is and why I believe it is very important evidence.
Basically, it seems to be a very large section of concrete. Not just large, but MASSIVE...several stories tall and many feet thick. I believe it to be a portion of a concrete shear wall which is something the PERPS do not want us to know existed in the towers because, if true, it causes MAJOR problems with their "weakened steel core column" story.
What was in the picture? = Part of the building as it collapsed... Thats my opinion. I dont believe this was an inside job... I dont believe in the Conspiracy Theroies regarding 9/11, MY OPINION!!!
Buildings just have no resistance to freefall much like the human race. 9/11 Ritual sacrifice and false-flag strike by terrorists in suits governing our world. They will never, ever have enough. They MUST be stopped.
I wish they woulda stamped their reports with a huge "FRAUD" in bold red letters
They make up fire temperatures. Which pieces of steel burned at 1100°F?? I know 157 of 160 perimeter columns for one of the towers were less than 500°F
They make up models that look nothing like the collapse (WTC 7). Seriously...compare the model side by side with any video.
I don't care if people call me a "CT'er" or "twoofer"...I call it as I see it.
Conspiracy theorists are a tumor on the prostate of REAL political activists who are interested in actually removing the power elite. Your theories which never hold up to scientific scrutiny make things worse for those of us interested in the real truth. We were attacked by Islamic extremists whom we paid and trained to fight the soviets many years prior. The problem is not an inside job but our outside interventionalist foreign policy that needs to be investigated. Youtube Noam Chomsky
The sad thing is...NIST's reports do not stand up to scientific scrutiny. Do you not think its strange that for two years they say "no WTC 7 never entered freefall" and then they turn around and say "wait...free fall did occur for 2.25 seconds". I'm an EI and I took a year of elementary physics for part of the engineering curriculum. There is no way John Gross or Shyam Sunder "missed" free fall. Oh yeah and when they finally admitted to it...they did not explain what the significance was.
Robbypyn, I really appreciate your viewpoint...it is SPOT ON! This big conspiracy theory about Arabs and boxcutters is EXACTLY the biggest TUMOR on our American prostate. You're right...the gubment's OFFICIAL conspiracy theory holds absolutely NO water and completely ignores Newtonian physics...yea it now even MAKES UP ITS OWN new laws of physics thanks to the buffoons at NIST. I also agree about our "too big for our britches" interventionalist foreign policy. Thanks for the support! ;o)
Its "looks" like a portion of a concrete wall...or at least thats what it appears to be. Looks to thick to be a floor slab, which I believe is only 6".
Just for everyones information, the available building prints do not show concrete detail. We are missing the complete set of structural drawings which would outline everything about concrete and also the steel used.
If u think otherwise, please provide us with something credible & logical. U know, something that makes sense.
Considering ur comment, I assume u don't know much about HOW NIST conducted it's "investigation", that's pretty clear. Other than that, if u know anything about laws of physics, u would certainly doubt all of the official theories, since they rely heavily on ignoring those laws.
Buildings do NOT suddenly start to implode on themselves "naturally", it's simple fact.
If you are watching this retarded video, you are looking for answers, or at least a different view on this.... I have two words for you... Loose Change
OK, the question was asked, "what is this thing, and what is it made of??". Let me explain... It is a space shuttle, and it is made out of space shuttly stuff.....
SWEET JESUS CHRIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The mystery is finally solved.... A space shuttle crashed into the towers... Finally, finally I can sleep at night....
And do you have the intellect to see that NIST's report is a total fraud?
If u don't, that then isn't much hope for u. Then u'll probably defend the real enemies (who are putting u up to this, who want u to believe in outside threats) to the death.
Sorry to hear that.
There is ample evidence to proove the official 911-story is a fraud, a deliberate attempt at deceiving the American people and the world. Stop hiding behind pride, u've been duped, it's OK, now take proper action.
Conjecture and "circumstantial evidence" (loose at best) is not ample evidence for anything. You, like all other "truthers" make logic leaps in the same way that people who believe intelligent design is science do.
If there are flaws in evidence, it does not assume that conclusion A is completely false, and therefore conclusion B is true. This is called an argument of composition, and it's the same tired bullshit all of you conspiracy theorists ramble on with.
The more u write streak, the more it becomes clear to me what ur physicsgrades were. Don't u ever watch CSI or something, Columbo maybe u know "Uhhh one more thing..." ;-)
U're fighting the WRONG people, u dummy! THAT"S the point! What is a real cause? U've been fucked my friend, by the same people who SENT YOU out to Afghanistan & Iraq to kill people u don't even know. If u want 2 fight for a real cause, take up ur arms & start knocking on the door of the White House & the Pentagon.
What grades did u get in physicsclass? Looks like the govt. fooled u bigtime, and got just what they wanted: thatis, an angry young man, wanting revenge in the name of "justice".
Doesn't really make me feel happy or anything. Personally I'm against being ordered what to do, especially when it comes to orders to kill other people. So when I see someone volunteering to get himself into that position, I tend 2 think "Was that the smart thing to do? "
What grades did you get? You are weak. Justice only comes to those who deserve when good men get off their asses and fight for a real cause. If it was not for men and women who left and got themselves into that 'position' would you be free today? You do the math.
Why is it so important (to you) to determine what this piece is? The whole goddamn tower is being blown to bits & pieces & pulverized concrete, in about 15 secs, there's ur proof of CD, ur proof that rules out gravity is the main cause for this kinda "strange" collapsebehavior.
This is, IMHO, direct evidence that FEMA and/or NIST lied about the tower's real structural components to sell us a disinfo story. It is a very complex Psyop. I believe the plans we now have are fake. There are other facets as to why this particular evidence is important which I do not have room to explain here. Please watch my second video at watch?v=X2MStxGeRdE
Then visit the website at the end of the video. Thanks!
Gasp! A large object! No way it could be a piece of the enormous steel tower that just collpsed, no sir. It must be a 150 foot long bomb or doomsday device of some sort.
And no shit it's visible on several photos and videos. The cameras are all filming the same thing, genius.
Hey streakingcameraman, I assure you the feeling is mutual! Why don't you contact a man named Bob McIlvaine, his son died on 9-11, and ask him if he thinks we're being immoral or disrespecting the dead. He'll inform you that by your being so close minded and uneducated about this subject, that's exactly what YOU'RE doing. Don't invoke the families as some sort of shield against the truth, until you know how the families feel, OK? Thanks.
First off, when you comment back make sure you hit reply on my comment. Second, you have one guy BOB, one guy out of the 3000 families. (I'm sure you have a couple more) However, 96 percent of the families do think you are disrespecting the dead when they look at ground zero and see your stupid protests. Don't hide behind 1 guy and say you speak for the rest of the families. FUCK YOU, thanks.
I think its like the second picture that you have outlined to the right hand side of bld 7, you see that part like rise up almost that looke like part of a fusalge.
Im not writing this to soud stupid and my eyes might not be to good along with my spelling but that segment of vidieo you might see a portion of fusalage,from whatever might have hit. that would indecate that the fire wasnt hot enouph to destroy it ?? yes ,no??
1. Does the object in question appear to be part of the exterior walls or the central core of the building?
2. Consider the enormous size of this object...does it appear to be made from the same materials that we all generally understand were used in the towers' construction? (steel)
The object in question appears to be a portion of the building's core that remained standing, at least the vertical parts of it, and so would consist of steel box columns. I did a bit of analysis on it a few years back and put up a couple of web pages. If you Google "plaguepuppy" and go to my homepage there are two links to articles about the "spire."
No, this is not joke. This is a very serious issue and I would never treat murder so flippantly. I don't "know" what it is...but I have what I think is a fairly good idea. I have my next video prepared, but I still would like a larger sampling of views and comments before I post it. Thanks everyone for the comments so far.
Maybe i´m crazy,but to me looks like a large rock;it also collapses,but after the rest of the tower,it have no sense that it collapses after,because it is down in the tower,anyway,i don´t see your point.
proving it was the government is a moot point the people behind it reached their goals and we the people have no voice and the constitution was undermined its just going to take time before we feel the full force of it even if ya posted a video of bush and his pals drinking a toast to and bragging about their role in the attacks it wont change the law written "patriots act of 2001"
Actually, it would. I am not a truther at all. I hate you truthers and everything you think your accomplishing by destroying the fabric of morals and disrespecting the dead.
However, Bush being caught on something like that, if it were true and it's not, would cause a conflict of issues. The first time following his crimes, the supreme court would deem it unconstitutional due to it's nature and the reason it was brought forth.
"Destroying the fabric of moral and disrespecting the dead?"
You do know there is a chance that 9/11 actually was an insidejob?
Let's pretend it is for a minute. That would make you a very ignorant human being right? And your statement should be changed to "Fighting for justice" while "Respecting the dead."
There is no chance that it was an inside job....NONE.
Until there is real evidence to show otherwise, it was a terrorist attack.
Let's pretend for a minute. You are an idiot. The statement would never be "Fighting for justice", Your not fight for anything. You are not respecting the dead, you walking over their graves to satisfy your little imaginations.
You one sad idiot human being if you ask me and the rest of the sane world.
Actually, false. Most people voting for Obama were uneducated minority voters from larger cities. Look up the specs. Only 35 percent of Whites voted for Obama. 90 percent of blacks. Now do you really think that 90 percent of the blacks are smarter than 65 percent of the whites? Maybe you should know what you are talking about.
However, Education has a much more impact on the way you see and study things. If you are have more knowledge, you tend to make a better decision based on it. If you are thinking that most white businessmen, blue collared workers, and military men, past and present, have a lower IQ than the entire black race, You are wrong. I see it the other way around.
Education and level of employment has nothing to do with iq. You might even think you yourself have a high iq..
better decisions? who decides what's better? And why are you mentioning "black race"? This has nothing to do with what i said. Some black people voted for Obama because he's black. Some women voted for Hillary because she's a woman. Some voted for McCain because their IQ is low. I'm quite sure if u get McCain to take an IQ test.. you will see he will be less than average.
Education and level of employment has everything to do with how intellegent you are. Are you dumb???
IQ scores are used in many contexts: as predictors of educational achievement or special needs, by social scientists who study the distribution of IQ scores in populations and the relationships between IQ score and other variables, and as predictors of job performance and income.
This is a very sad and misguided attitude. We're talking about justice here, remember THAT? It's that thing you desire when someone slaughters your loved ones to further their own geopolitical profiteering agenda.
Focusing on labeling people to avoid dealing with the REAL issues is plain wrong. 9/11 has been NON-INVESTIGATED. It is a prima facie case for an inside job and the blood of the innocents DEMAND justice. Your song would be different if you lost someone close to you in all this...
Actually, you misguided. We are talking justice, but make sure your pointing your finger in the right direction. 911 has been investigated. Every time a new agency does investigate it you blow it off. After I saw 911 I volenteered for deployment to afghanistan. What have you done? I want to destroy the real people behind it not the make believe people in the government that you say did it. Get a clue you idiot.
Anymore name calling and foul mouth language, and I'll block you. Make your points without that garbage or find somewhere else to be...
Now, while I appreciate and support our military folks, I do not appreciate having that same service shoved up my nose trying to discredit my viewpoints. I served my country in other capacities equally as valuable in the medical field. The 9/11 Commission and these other "investigations" were clearly smoke screen operations. Do a little checking first...
Any investigation is called a smoke screen by you idiots. You should check the credibility of your sources. Loose change is false, alex jones is an idiot, and all of your "SCIENTISTS" are the black sheep of all the other accredited scientist in the community. I do not care what you did in the medical field, that's not the fight for freedom. That is a job here in the united states, nothing more to many people. You have not served your country.
Stop using these asinine labels! "Truther"...it's ridiculous. I'm an AMERICAN like you are! Stop thinking that anyone with a different perspective than you is an IDIOT and open your eyes! You need to live a bit buddy....you don't know it all...neither do I. None of us do...and you'd better stop being such a naive cowboy. You wanna talk about bogus scientists...talk about the ones at NIST that just make up new physics principles as they go along to suit their bogus story...
You are a disgrace to the real American men and women only trying to better their lives and protect themselves against the real threats in this world. The scientist at NIST have more intellegence that any, any truther scientist to date. Let me ask you something, how come none of your precious scientist have came up with a real smoking gun in the last 7 years??? How long does it take??? NIST has came up with more realistic answers than any of your 'scientists'. Show me some more BS TRUTHER.
These towers were exploded and the evidence for it is beyond impeachment or question. The media has clearly been involved in misdirecting the public away from any of the real facts and glaring inconsistencies in the official story and it's "investigation". This WAS in inside job and the effectiveness of the psyop surrounding it is amazing. Gravitational collapses alone cannot eject tons of materials upwards and laterally from the site for hundreds of feet.
First off, stick with the medical field. If you have ever seen a building being leveled by explosives you can not compare them to the towers. You do not have any facts, NONE. Declaring it was an inside job with no real evidence is nothing more than an uneducated assumption. Gravitational collapses alone can thrust materials hundreds of feet to the side given the side of the building. When the towers fell, do you think all the material would have went straigh downward? No.
please refer me to one other building collapse that has occurred in history that came down like the towers did. I have seen plenty of controlled demolitions and that's how it appeared to me. Don't know where you received schooling but gravity does not cause explosion. The buildings, at worst should have toppled or maybe the top part would fall off the rest of the building. Physics doesn't allow for this collapse as it happened.
My point is that it is not part of the OUTER structure...it's part of the core....and it's NOT steel...it appears to be a huge piece of reinforced concrete. If that is true, then FEMA and NIST have some explaining to do and we need to see some REAL plans for these buildings. I contend the tower cores were not entirely made of STEEL and the official story of weakened core columns is 100% BOGUS...
it looks like the plane :P
iisimplybarbiie 5 months ago
it looks like a torpedo/ bomb like thing, i watched another couple of videos in the past and a object like the one that we are focusing on in the video was somehow attached to the bottom of the aircraft that struck the south tower. mabey im wrong but could it be possible that this object in this video could be the same object that was attached to the plane???? correct me if im wrong
bosser231 5 months ago
Looks like just a part of the building to me.
73849309378 5 months ago
wat do u think it is ?
michaelalee2011 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What is that suppose to be?
Mrzombie353 8 months ago
The object is the remains of the stairwell,usually construtced of poured cement or cinder blocks because a stairwell must be fireproof . I have seen the stairwells built before the frame is installed in several mid rise building in my area. This video also shows good views of the remaining vertical core columns before their collapse,notice that the floors and trusses have fallen away and the beams are beginning to sway.Your video disproves the "fell at free fall speed" argument.
mrtommynazi 9 months ago
bullshit you disinfo CUNT,9/11 was inside job 2 create a fake war on terrorism u mug,wake the fuck up nob!
TheLordporter 10 months ago
@TheLordporter your be the one that needs wakin up when i knock you the fuck out you conspiracy theory thick twat!
jrgniuwer 9 months ago
It's a giant ice cream cone maker. Wow! It took me a while
lamtech2008 11 months ago
it is left over stuff, walls, and concrete
Airplane299 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You guys want to see the destruction? Watch my video.
CoolWeirdVideo 11 months ago
It's an alien spacecraft...obviously.
Drucef 11 months ago
@Drucef You're an alien spacecraft... obviously.
samurai2828 11 months ago
@samurai2828: Aww how cute. What are you in, the 1st grade?
Drucef 11 months ago
Like a portion of the exterior wall being sheered off. This hardly qualifies as "A HA" material.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
Troofers scientificly smell the nano-thermite and see the Larry Silverstein with remote controll pushing the red button in this clip..
nadoeloiskat 1 year ago
is it the bottom half of the antenna that was on the roof after all it was outside and could not have been totally destroyed by the explosions inside the building
webcontroller1 1 year ago
watch?v=8OL6PmVJZhI here is another video showing possibly the pulverizing smoke event we see here. It seems to be a section of the inner core, opposite to the remaining core we see on the right
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
watch?v=k3p0A8bSC3I May shed light on the subject, please take a look
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
@IExposeMormonism The "watch." I left above isn't working, it takes you to a google site. type in September 11th 2001 WTC Falls? WNBC Dub 10 04. the account is "911crasting". It is at least interesting
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
Uhmmm...it's part of the Trade Center wall collapsing?
What else do you think it is? A Space Shuttle?
I guess I just don't get your point.
If anything, it gives credence to the "Warren Report" that building seven collapsed due to fall-out from the towers.
DannyBruiz 1 year ago
@DannyBruiz LOL!!! Love the sarcastic tone!! If anything these idiots deserve even more of it!!!. My whole take on these Truther videos?. You have the right to post it and i have the right to make fun of it.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
Well, it seems to be stepped in construction with a distinct peak. It is covered in dust like everything else even though the entire event is only seconds old. There are two distinct bright spots on the bottom and many such spots around the base perimeter. I'm thinking, after many views, it is part of the elevator shaft system. It was part of the core. It had this shape +/-. And whatever is going on here is way past conventional explosives!
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
new video this is fake the steel girders weren't there after the collapse what a joke FUCK OFF disinfo CUNT.For the people who want to see the real collapses dont click on anything that says NEW.Technolgy come quiet some way in ten years especially in video,camera,computer sectors so dont let some little PRICK munipulate footage and believe him
revolutionary1982 1 year ago
This video makes no sense whatsoever
ScaredMoon 1 year ago
@wetfootmusic78 "...there wasnt many collumns holding the tops up" apart from 47 central columns that went from top to bottom
MrTrotskysGhost 1 year ago
Check architecs for 9/11 truth. They have a footage of the North Tower collapse which clearly shows detonation charges.
sacopenapa 1 year ago
Well we could deliberate for the rest of our lives on what exactly that might be - but in a nutshell, it's part of the building. It matters not which bit from which face or floor.
What matters is that we all know it was brought down by thermate explosives used as part of a demolition process, masquerading as a terrorist attack to win the hearts of congress, so that funding would be made available to wage a war on Iraq.
That's all folks!
acorntechnique 1 year ago
its a plane propellar
maverick16cuthberts 1 year ago
You guys are so retarded and your a disgrace to this country. This was an act of terrorism and not a damn conspiracy. Get a life losers!
zggyk400 1 year ago
EXplosions.... The buildings seem to be exploding into dust... NOT collapsing floor by floor!
ThePeacefulResistor 1 year ago
For the size and density it looks to me like a remnant of the core. It would appear to be intact because of the girders running through it.It may well have been the only object that obeyed the law of conservation of momentum by actually staying intact.
stratocaster539 1 year ago
if i look at 1:36 it looks like a peace of a rocket or nose of the plane on the others it looks more like peace of the front wall becous i see those paterns in thare but maby i think to muth i hope you guys find out the truth peace from belgium
verybigego 1 year ago
BADA BING BADA BOOM....INSIDE JOB!
MentalHenryKissinger 1 year ago
to me it looks like a statue in the higher elevation pictures.. reminds me of the statue of mary mother of Jesus with its shape and circular base..Don't get me wrong I'm not saying it is just resembles the shape closely..in the first couple of shots it just looks like a wall falling over if that can be seen in the first 2 shots
MrColdsense 1 year ago
What is it and what is it made of ?
And where did it go ?
broonlerxt2112 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And the LORD said to me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem.
Jeremiah 11:9
GhostofCliffGullett 1 year ago
I 100% agree plz retarded sheep..wake up
NeogiTek 1 year ago
No matter what you are told or what you think you see all three buildings came down caused by an implosion.
garciarosa100 1 year ago 7
@garciarosa100
I see an EXplosion with the first two main towers, not an IMplosion. I see these buildings exploding upwards and outwards from the top down. I cannot see any mechanism other than planted explosive devices causing this type of damage and behavior. With WTC7, I see it coming down in very much a classical demolition style. There are differences between how the larger towers were destroyed and WTC7, but I see all three as managed demolitions. Plane crashes cannot account for it.
FreshKillsJustice 1 year ago 16
@FreshKillsJustice Please watch Dimitri Khalezov vids about the destruction of the WTC's.
Look up the definition of ground zero in a dictionary.
Peace
antonfilth 4 months ago
@garciarosa100 hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! its really funny how i realise how long man has been evolving for and your comment shows that the human brain has not fully evolved at this stage! ;)
jrgniuwer 9 months ago
@garciarosa100 - implosion? - I missed that! - blown to kingdom come is all I saw!
TREACLE97 5 months ago
At minute 1:20 we see its base. There are two bright flashes. You can see many small bursts around the outer diameter. I found a cleaner version of this and it is very clear in that picture. So, what has a circular base that was accessible? It must be 5+stories tall. It is part of the core area. It could be a collection of the elevator services. But when I see dust I now think concrete. But I find no evidence the core had concrete. So, I'm not convinced it is concrete/core. But it is real.
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
theres alot of other facts that point the finger at the government...ive done alot of research and even asked top conspiracy groups questions that they didnt respond to. questions like "what if the government had to do it because of the future oil shortage?" its a scary thought but IF the government did it ..they did becuz they had to and ofcouse making money in the process wouldnt bother them. they DID make alot of money. GB is still laffing all the way to the bank.
texrainger 1 year ago
At 1:18 we see a circular base tilting over. We see a shadow under the base. But I also see a ring of small bright spots which I think are Explosives, like the one we see at 2:30 on the base of "it", towards center. The only things looking like this foaming gray is the concrete being pulverized. But by what? What turns 200,000 tons of concrete into little rocks..
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
@krayzeejojo , i agree it just looks like a chuck of white looking wall, if you look at the shots, you notice theres a 3D look to it, you can see the darker face of the chuck of wall, which is facing the camera on one of the shots, IMO its just some wall falling over.
BillyBobBizWorth 1 year ago
I wanna say it's a huge chunk of wall because it looks like it's breaking off and tipping over, but I can't tell for sure.
krayzeejojo 1 year ago
You are correct in expecting to see asymmetrical "collapse", given that the damage from the planes was also asymmetrical. However, your statement that "there wasnt many collumns holding the tops up" fails to address the unique design characteristics of the Twin Towers. The "net" of perimeter columns were designed to transfer loads from above AROUND weakened areas in exactly this type of damage from jetliners. The buildings were literally designed to SUSTAIN this type of damage without failure.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago 8
@FreshKillsJustice exactly. and nobody gets this. i think frank dimartino was talking about this a few months before he was murdered.
wldeanml 1 year ago
@FreshKillsJustice And the Titanic was designed to be unsinkable.
ovillian 6 months ago
Please see the sidebar EDIT with updated video #2...it explains my thoughts on this.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
i heard that the freedom tower will be done by 2012 or 2013,can't wait to see it.
LAYSGUY 2 years ago
might it be part of the building that wasnt immediately pulverized by thermate?
might it be equipment of some kind which was originally stored at the top of the building, but not affected by the explosions until it fell further?
CSIWEMBLEY 2 years ago
It certainly wasn't a piece that was immediately destroyed due to it's obvious massive size. I personally do not see this segment as anything mechanical in form. By all visual estimates I can make, it appears to be a large section of concrete and my 2nd video (see the side bar for link) attempts to explain how I believe this all fits into the 9/11 tragedy.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
ya ok ...thank you for replying...some one needs to get to the bottom of if......i think the answers will bring life changing answers........spiritually,politicaly,just alaround life changing
urjunk78 2 years ago
@FreshKillsJustice It looks like the plane in two of your shots. Look at the shape closely you can even see the nose
SuperDiva711 5 months ago
@wetfootmusic78
Very well said...
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
So what did/do you think the object is?
jfragghianti 2 years ago
looks like a aircraft carrier lol
ozbillybong 2 years ago
that was my 1st guess too lol
SH69TERMCGAVIN 2 years ago
Result of years of inside jobs coming from the Clinton Administration. Please see Clinton's reaction when confronted by the truth movement. How dare you question 911. Wow! And he is a democrat.
Massaricossudo 2 years ago
i say that it is a section of perimeter columns being ejected away with massive amounts of heat induced ablation trailing off it. look at photos of the ground zero so-called debris pile and realize that almost all of the 47 massive core columns simply disappeared.
only vaporization could cause their disappearance and only a very very great heat source could cause vaporization of steel.
wtcdemolitionDOTblogspotDOTcom
jamesha175 2 years ago
@jamesha175: Thanks for your comments. I don't disagree with your overall assessment. Much of the WTC contents and materials simply evaporated or was pulverized into fine particulates. However, this particular section appears to have distinct edges that maintain their structure until later in the destruction sequence when it begins to disintegrate. I do not see this section being made of steel columns. It appears to be a massive monolithic structure in my estimation.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
i saw your previous comment re: that oddity being a chunk of core concrete - i can't dispute that but i do recall seeing a photo of both towers with the sun (morning or evening?) shining thru them, and we could actually see all the way thru - and it seemed to me that there was no concrete core. sorry but i have no link to that photo.
anyway, it would take a very very great heat source to destroy any concrete to the minute dust that was in evidence.
i think that you see what i am saying.
jamesha175 2 years ago
what was it?
kirbyhater2 2 years ago
it looks to me like the concrete walls, perhaps the outer wall, the concrete did emit alot of smoke all of it did, in fact the inner core thats to the left vapoizes to dust just as it starts to fall
Mastirshake 2 years ago
After 3 months you havn't got one good answer; so what is it?
permohn 2 years ago
@permohn
I have another video that answers the question I've asked in this one which has already been out for some time now. See the comments for the URL. But the short answer is that I believe this to be a very large section of a reinforced concrete core wall. This is significant because all public information about the central cores touts the steel column design and completely avoids any mention of significant use of concrete which really is a challenge to the "fire melts steel core" story.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
@FreshKillsJustice Yes, I saw it. If it is at ground level, it must be. But it also must be from the core because "The Spire" is the NE corner of the WTC. And your object is inside that corner. Your object helps confirm "The Spire" is not part of the core..
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago
its a big chunk of concrete and its made of concrete...
CALUCATCEPS 2 years ago
GodSpeed2012 has an excellent quality video to work from. I don't know what it is exactly but it appears to be related to the inner load bearing walls. There is another piece of wall (?) falling almost laterally and behind this object. Perhaps it wall with marble attached. All the concrete is being pulverized in front of us. It's hard to keep that in mind
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago
@IExposeMormonism
One phenomenon I keep seeing is the "smoke" trailing from the falling debris chunks.However, when you observe it a bit more closely, it seems to be that these pieces of debris are actually EMITTING these smoke trails as if they are disintegrating on the way down, rather than just residue blowing off.There's just too much of it to be a residue, at least in my estimation. It's like the debris is dissolving in mid air, which seems very much in line with the overall destruction.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
@FreshKillsJustice Yes. All the streaming smoke is the concrete flooring. But the concrete was poured into steel pans, 10x60ft and 4" deep, I think. It's a stunning thought. And like "they" say; "The largest piece the largest piece I've seen is half of a phone key pad, no desks, no computers, nothing". In the past few months I have realized just how absent chunks of concrete are in the rubble. The largest I have seen is perhaps 100lbs!
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago
i believe that the nano thermite was pianted on most if not all of the concrete, remeber they had acess to every other floor, so they could have painted the underneath and outer walls on each of those floors
Mastirshake 2 years ago
i swear ur fuking retarted dude its probably part of the plane of part of the building
WTHisthatstudios 2 years ago
lmao, ya and 2 engines fell down the elevator shafts. As you can tell over 80% of the public now know this was a inside job
Mastirshake 2 years ago
@Mastirshake Even painting it on is a big deal. But they did do something like that. Floor by floor. It hard to fathom that we are watching a "Foaming Concrete WTC". And I don't think 20% of the public is aware of this or wants to deal with it. So far all I have done is upset people and they Refuse to look at it!!
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago
um it can t be the plane....it disintergrated
MrLetsfindout 2 years ago
i know it was an inside job but this is bullshit!
yuchoobstalker 2 years ago
Look at 1:17.....does anyone else see an eye underneath the object? Looks like work of the Illuminati...
snipermonkey86 2 years ago
it sounds weird but it looks like the remains of an fa-22 fighting raptor and its still pretty much intact compare actual photos, either that or a triangular top section of the roof,im confused. cant explain
RRMK711 2 years ago
a lot of faces there...
in english it calls "The WALL" I guess... wall - a part of building. iam crying everytime I'm watching this movies... sad very hard experience for all my life
l0lkie 2 years ago
holy crap! did u see that thing?! dude y would a part of a building be rite next 2 a falling building!? it doesnt make sense!!
claw9160 2 years ago
Its just a part of the building. Sorry I have studied some building and see see nothing unusual about this particular point.
karlkarlkarl1234 2 years ago
Wow look at that smoke 0:39 lot of Face.
jheknight 2 years ago
if u or anyone watchs wwe,
like at 0.40 u kinda see kanes face
MarthJiggzBrawler927 2 years ago
LOL
jheknight 2 years ago
The World Trade Center construction was 100 percent documented by video crews. To see the buildings being built, and to get up close to the true architecture, all you would have to do is to watch the fim "Man on Wire" by James Marsh. Video footage of the construction of the towers shows that the biggest marvel of the world, the heighth of technological prowess and power at that time was such a vast undertaking that the whole thing was shot in high definition film of the times.
litterallyfatigued 2 years ago
Well, that is partially correct. I have watched all the "available" footage of the construction. Yet, I find the portions that photograph the core structures always focuses on the upper most sections under current construction. Christoper Brown alleges that the actual concrete core pours were taking place seven or eight stories below the upper deck at any given time. He alleges there was another video aired by PBS which has now been removed from their records which shows much more.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
What is that? when the smoke came down it's right next to that building?
BibiKajol 2 years ago
yeah it looks like smoke to me
gobigblue52 2 years ago
I hav no idea wat this is. wat do you think it is??
mickles21486 2 years ago
If 9/11 was an inside job or not the 2 planes which hit the pentagon and the second to hit one of the towers could have been prevented it could have been shot down if it doesn't land and don't tell me that Innocent people were on da plane cuz wasn't the thousands of people who were in the WTC innocent 2? noing dat either way innocent people will die wouldn't it be better if less people die then 3k?
Krayz8o8 2 years ago
what the hell is it looks like part of the building
lewisis21 2 years ago
We were led to believe that the towers were constructed primarily of large steel core columns and that little or no structural concrete was used. What you see is, in my opinion, a massive section of a steel-reinforced concrete sheer wall that is part of the REAL central core construction. The official story relies heavily on the public accepting the "fire weakened the steel columns" garbage that NIST and FEMA have shoveled for the last 8 years. These towers did not "fall"...they were exploded.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
Well, FreshKills, you are dead wrong.
Why would a concreate shear wall being demo'ed create that irregular shape?
RDX and Composition demolition charges are made to cut at critical load bearing points in the steel structure, and they notoriously produce Square debris.
Doubt me? Go look at online Las Vegas Casino implosions, some of which I worked on, and see if any irregular portions like what you point out, exist.
.
Merlin5x5 2 years ago
The explanation given by Christoper Brown on his website made sense to me. He says there was a halt in the concrete pour which left some of the explosive materials used on the rebar exposed to the weather, likely rendering it faulty at detonation time. Other demo circuits below and adjacent to this particular section finished the job. But before you begin to defame me on this, please realize that we do NOT have all the pieces to the 9/11 puzzle. This is why we need a NEW REAL investigation.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
There are several problems with discussing the specifics. First, there are very few real demo experts qualified to do so. That is where the shills love to come in with their pseudo-knowledge and try to discredit honest folks who are truly searching for the truth. The FACT IS...we do not know everything about 9/11...but we DO know enough to confidently conclude the previous 9/11 Commision (non) Investigation was a complete whitewash and MUST be reopened without oversight from possible perps.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
See
worldwideweb drjudywoods com
z1zaz 2 years ago
My other video is titled:
North Tower - Concrete Core
Found here:
watch?v=X2MStxGeRdE
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
Please see my other video which fully explains what I believe this object/material is and why I believe it is very important evidence.
Basically, it seems to be a very large section of concrete. Not just large, but MASSIVE...several stories tall and many feet thick. I believe it to be a portion of a concrete shear wall which is something the PERPS do not want us to know existed in the towers because, if true, it causes MAJOR problems with their "weakened steel core column" story.
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
seriously, the object is just the remaining parts of the building
are people that stupid?
blaxxus 2 years ago
Can't you all see, its a ufo flying out of the basement
biglaroy 2 years ago
What was in the picture? = Part of the building as it collapsed... Thats my opinion. I dont believe this was an inside job... I dont believe in the Conspiracy Theroies regarding 9/11, MY OPINION!!!
NPRT2004 2 years ago
Buildings just have no resistance to freefall much like the human race. 9/11 Ritual sacrifice and false-flag strike by terrorists in suits governing our world. They will never, ever have enough. They MUST be stopped.
smmeegal 3 years ago
I wish they woulda stamped their reports with a huge "FRAUD" in bold red letters
They make up fire temperatures. Which pieces of steel burned at 1100°F?? I know 157 of 160 perimeter columns for one of the towers were less than 500°F
They make up models that look nothing like the collapse (WTC 7). Seriously...compare the model side by side with any video.
I don't care if people call me a "CT'er" or "twoofer"...I call it as I see it.
JSSTyger 3 years ago 2
Conspiracy theorists are a tumor on the prostate of REAL political activists who are interested in actually removing the power elite. Your theories which never hold up to scientific scrutiny make things worse for those of us interested in the real truth. We were attacked by Islamic extremists whom we paid and trained to fight the soviets many years prior. The problem is not an inside job but our outside interventionalist foreign policy that needs to be investigated. Youtube Noam Chomsky
robbypyn 3 years ago
The sad thing is...NIST's reports do not stand up to scientific scrutiny. Do you not think its strange that for two years they say "no WTC 7 never entered freefall" and then they turn around and say "wait...free fall did occur for 2.25 seconds". I'm an EI and I took a year of elementary physics for part of the engineering curriculum. There is no way John Gross or Shyam Sunder "missed" free fall. Oh yeah and when they finally admitted to it...they did not explain what the significance was.
JSSTyger 3 years ago
Robbypyn, I really appreciate your viewpoint...it is SPOT ON! This big conspiracy theory about Arabs and boxcutters is EXACTLY the biggest TUMOR on our American prostate. You're right...the gubment's OFFICIAL conspiracy theory holds absolutely NO water and completely ignores Newtonian physics...yea it now even MAKES UP ITS OWN new laws of physics thanks to the buffoons at NIST. I also agree about our "too big for our britches" interventionalist foreign policy. Thanks for the support! ;o)
FreshKillsJustice 2 years ago
Its "looks" like a portion of a concrete wall...or at least thats what it appears to be. Looks to thick to be a floor slab, which I believe is only 6".
Just for everyones information, the available building prints do not show concrete detail. We are missing the complete set of structural drawings which would outline everything about concrete and also the steel used.
JSSTyger 3 years ago
Just looks like debris to me =/ please message me if the results are different to what i think it is =)
rangegod93 3 years ago
I have no idea looks sort of like dust
gray building part in dust i guess
m1o2r3i4o5n 3 years ago
Dear hilzor,
If u think otherwise, please provide us with something credible & logical. U know, something that makes sense.
Considering ur comment, I assume u don't know much about HOW NIST conducted it's "investigation", that's pretty clear. Other than that, if u know anything about laws of physics, u would certainly doubt all of the official theories, since they rely heavily on ignoring those laws.
Buildings do NOT suddenly start to implode on themselves "naturally", it's simple fact.
Sandberg1972 3 years ago
If you are watching this retarded video, you are looking for answers, or at least a different view on this.... I have two words for you... Loose Change
govmentmule 3 years ago
Damn those crafty aliens, and 33rd degree masons......
govmentmule 3 years ago
OK, the question was asked, "what is this thing, and what is it made of??". Let me explain... It is a space shuttle, and it is made out of space shuttly stuff.....
govmentmule 3 years ago
SWEET JESUS CHRIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The mystery is finally solved.... A space shuttle crashed into the towers... Finally, finally I can sleep at night....
govmentmule 3 years ago
And do you have the intellect to see that NIST's report is a total fraud?
If u don't, that then isn't much hope for u. Then u'll probably defend the real enemies (who are putting u up to this, who want u to believe in outside threats) to the death.
Sorry to hear that.
There is ample evidence to proove the official 911-story is a fraud, a deliberate attempt at deceiving the American people and the world. Stop hiding behind pride, u've been duped, it's OK, now take proper action.
Sandberg1972 3 years ago
Actually there isn't.
Conjecture and "circumstantial evidence" (loose at best) is not ample evidence for anything. You, like all other "truthers" make logic leaps in the same way that people who believe intelligent design is science do.
If there are flaws in evidence, it does not assume that conclusion A is completely false, and therefore conclusion B is true. This is called an argument of composition, and it's the same tired bullshit all of you conspiracy theorists ramble on with.
hilzor 3 years ago
The more u write streak, the more it becomes clear to me what ur physicsgrades were. Don't u ever watch CSI or something, Columbo maybe u know "Uhhh one more thing..." ;-)
U're fighting the WRONG people, u dummy! THAT"S the point! What is a real cause? U've been fucked my friend, by the same people who SENT YOU out to Afghanistan & Iraq to kill people u don't even know. If u want 2 fight for a real cause, take up ur arms & start knocking on the door of the White House & the Pentagon.
Sandberg1972 3 years ago 2
agree with Sandberg1972
sovsfan 3 years ago 2
Djee streak,
What grades did u get in physicsclass? Looks like the govt. fooled u bigtime, and got just what they wanted: thatis, an angry young man, wanting revenge in the name of "justice".
Doesn't really make me feel happy or anything. Personally I'm against being ordered what to do, especially when it comes to orders to kill other people. So when I see someone volunteering to get himself into that position, I tend 2 think "Was that the smart thing to do? "
Come on, do the math.
Sandberg1972 3 years ago
What grades did you get? You are weak. Justice only comes to those who deserve when good men get off their asses and fight for a real cause. If it was not for men and women who left and got themselves into that 'position' would you be free today? You do the math.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
Why is it so important (to you) to determine what this piece is? The whole goddamn tower is being blown to bits & pieces & pulverized concrete, in about 15 secs, there's ur proof of CD, ur proof that rules out gravity is the main cause for this kinda "strange" collapsebehavior.
Sandberg1972 3 years ago
This is, IMHO, direct evidence that FEMA and/or NIST lied about the tower's real structural components to sell us a disinfo story. It is a very complex Psyop. I believe the plans we now have are fake. There are other facets as to why this particular evidence is important which I do not have room to explain here. Please watch my second video at watch?v=X2MStxGeRdE
Then visit the website at the end of the video. Thanks!
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago
Gasp! A large object! No way it could be a piece of the enormous steel tower that just collpsed, no sir. It must be a 150 foot long bomb or doomsday device of some sort.
And no shit it's visible on several photos and videos. The cameras are all filming the same thing, genius.
Gaiacarra 3 years ago
Hey streakingcameraman, I assure you the feeling is mutual! Why don't you contact a man named Bob McIlvaine, his son died on 9-11, and ask him if he thinks we're being immoral or disrespecting the dead. He'll inform you that by your being so close minded and uneducated about this subject, that's exactly what YOU'RE doing. Don't invoke the families as some sort of shield against the truth, until you know how the families feel, OK? Thanks.
DSM10471isadick 3 years ago
First off, when you comment back make sure you hit reply on my comment. Second, you have one guy BOB, one guy out of the 3000 families. (I'm sure you have a couple more) However, 96 percent of the families do think you are disrespecting the dead when they look at ground zero and see your stupid protests. Don't hide behind 1 guy and say you speak for the rest of the families. FUCK YOU, thanks.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
I think its like the second picture that you have outlined to the right hand side of bld 7, you see that part like rise up almost that looke like part of a fusalge.
jamm58 3 years ago
Im not writing this to soud stupid and my eyes might not be to good along with my spelling but that segment of vidieo you might see a portion of fusalage,from whatever might have hit. that would indecate that the fire wasnt hot enouph to destroy it ?? yes ,no??
jamm58 3 years ago
I don't see anything that looks like a fuselage. Are you referring to the object I have highlighted in the red rectangle?
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago
I've just posted my video explaining what I believe we are seeing here and why I feel it is so very important. Please view it here:
watch?v=X2MStxGeRdE
Thank you for your comments. Please post at the new video. Thanks!
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago
tbh I cant tell, an uneducated guess would be that its some kind of cemented building material but it is extremely large.
Perhaps its the facia of the building? PM me what you think it is if you dont mind
We need REAL answers for 9/11, none of it makes any sense.
Coachramsies 3 years ago
Ok, some food for thought...
1. Does the object in question appear to be part of the exterior walls or the central core of the building?
2. Consider the enormous size of this object...does it appear to be made from the same materials that we all generally understand were used in the towers' construction? (steel)
3. If not, then what material is it likely to be?
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago
The object in question appears to be a portion of the building's core that remained standing, at least the vertical parts of it, and so would consist of steel box columns. I did a bit of analysis on it a few years back and put up a couple of web pages. If you Google "plaguepuppy" and go to my homepage there are two links to articles about the "spire."
plaguepuppy 3 years ago
Thanks Jeff, I will respond to your message hopefully later tonight. Thank you very much for taking the time to respond. Much appreciated!
@1911criz:
No, this is not joke. This is a very serious issue and I would never treat murder so flippantly. I don't "know" what it is...but I have what I think is a fairly good idea. I have my next video prepared, but I still would like a larger sampling of views and comments before I post it. Thanks everyone for the comments so far.
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago
Personally I think the guy is playing a joke on everybody. He doesnt even know what it is bet.
1911criz 3 years ago
Maybe i´m crazy,but to me looks like a large rock;it also collapses,but after the rest of the tower,it have no sense that it collapses after,because it is down in the tower,anyway,i don´t see your point.
tonykratos 3 years ago
proving it was the government is a moot point the people behind it reached their goals and we the people have no voice and the constitution was undermined its just going to take time before we feel the full force of it even if ya posted a video of bush and his pals drinking a toast to and bragging about their role in the attacks it wont change the law written "patriots act of 2001"
nikkj2 3 years ago
Actually, it would. I am not a truther at all. I hate you truthers and everything you think your accomplishing by destroying the fabric of morals and disrespecting the dead.
However, Bush being caught on something like that, if it were true and it's not, would cause a conflict of issues. The first time following his crimes, the supreme court would deem it unconstitutional due to it's nature and the reason it was brought forth.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
Streakingcameraman
"Destroying the fabric of moral and disrespecting the dead?"
You do know there is a chance that 9/11 actually was an insidejob?
Let's pretend it is for a minute. That would make you a very ignorant human being right? And your statement should be changed to "Fighting for justice" while "Respecting the dead."
You are a sad human being indeed.
Jjinn1 3 years ago 2
There is no chance that it was an inside job....NONE.
Until there is real evidence to show otherwise, it was a terrorist attack.
Let's pretend for a minute. You are an idiot. The statement would never be "Fighting for justice", Your not fight for anything. You are not respecting the dead, you walking over their graves to satisfy your little imaginations.
You one sad idiot human being if you ask me and the rest of the sane world.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
You voted for McCain... Need i say more?
Jjinn1 3 years ago
You voted for Obama, you truly want the terrorists to win.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
False. I am not allowed to vote in your country. I am from Denmark.
Besides i would have voted for neither candidate.
Last but not least, there are no terrorists. Those areas in the States voting for McCain, have a low IQ compared to average americans.
You dear sir, are one of those sad beings. However i do wish for you that you will have a nice life for as long as you live.
Have a good day.
Jjinn1 3 years ago
Actually, false. Most people voting for Obama were uneducated minority voters from larger cities. Look up the specs. Only 35 percent of Whites voted for Obama. 90 percent of blacks. Now do you really think that 90 percent of the blacks are smarter than 65 percent of the whites? Maybe you should know what you are talking about.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
Education has nothing to do with IQ.
But you knew this right?
Jjinn1 3 years ago
However, Education has a much more impact on the way you see and study things. If you are have more knowledge, you tend to make a better decision based on it. If you are thinking that most white businessmen, blue collared workers, and military men, past and present, have a lower IQ than the entire black race, You are wrong. I see it the other way around.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
Education and level of employment has nothing to do with iq. You might even think you yourself have a high iq..
better decisions? who decides what's better? And why are you mentioning "black race"? This has nothing to do with what i said. Some black people voted for Obama because he's black. Some women voted for Hillary because she's a woman. Some voted for McCain because their IQ is low. I'm quite sure if u get McCain to take an IQ test.. you will see he will be less than average.
Jjinn1 3 years ago
Education and level of employment has everything to do with how intellegent you are. Are you dumb???
IQ scores are used in many contexts: as predictors of educational achievement or special needs, by social scientists who study the distribution of IQ scores in populations and the relationships between IQ score and other variables, and as predictors of job performance and income.
Straight out of the book. Any questions?
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
This is a very sad and misguided attitude. We're talking about justice here, remember THAT? It's that thing you desire when someone slaughters your loved ones to further their own geopolitical profiteering agenda.
Focusing on labeling people to avoid dealing with the REAL issues is plain wrong. 9/11 has been NON-INVESTIGATED. It is a prima facie case for an inside job and the blood of the innocents DEMAND justice. Your song would be different if you lost someone close to you in all this...
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago
Actually, you misguided. We are talking justice, but make sure your pointing your finger in the right direction. 911 has been investigated. Every time a new agency does investigate it you blow it off. After I saw 911 I volenteered for deployment to afghanistan. What have you done? I want to destroy the real people behind it not the make believe people in the government that you say did it. Get a clue you idiot.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
Anymore name calling and foul mouth language, and I'll block you. Make your points without that garbage or find somewhere else to be...
Now, while I appreciate and support our military folks, I do not appreciate having that same service shoved up my nose trying to discredit my viewpoints. I served my country in other capacities equally as valuable in the medical field. The 9/11 Commission and these other "investigations" were clearly smoke screen operations. Do a little checking first...
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago
Block me, I see how truther logic is.
Any investigation is called a smoke screen by you idiots. You should check the credibility of your sources. Loose change is false, alex jones is an idiot, and all of your "SCIENTISTS" are the black sheep of all the other accredited scientist in the community. I do not care what you did in the medical field, that's not the fight for freedom. That is a job here in the united states, nothing more to many people. You have not served your country.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
Stop using these asinine labels! "Truther"...it's ridiculous. I'm an AMERICAN like you are! Stop thinking that anyone with a different perspective than you is an IDIOT and open your eyes! You need to live a bit buddy....you don't know it all...neither do I. None of us do...and you'd better stop being such a naive cowboy. You wanna talk about bogus scientists...talk about the ones at NIST that just make up new physics principles as they go along to suit their bogus story...
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago
You are a disgrace to the real American men and women only trying to better their lives and protect themselves against the real threats in this world. The scientist at NIST have more intellegence that any, any truther scientist to date. Let me ask you something, how come none of your precious scientist have came up with a real smoking gun in the last 7 years??? How long does it take??? NIST has came up with more realistic answers than any of your 'scientists'. Show me some more BS TRUTHER.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
These towers were exploded and the evidence for it is beyond impeachment or question. The media has clearly been involved in misdirecting the public away from any of the real facts and glaring inconsistencies in the official story and it's "investigation". This WAS in inside job and the effectiveness of the psyop surrounding it is amazing. Gravitational collapses alone cannot eject tons of materials upwards and laterally from the site for hundreds of feet.
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago
First off, stick with the medical field. If you have ever seen a building being leveled by explosives you can not compare them to the towers. You do not have any facts, NONE. Declaring it was an inside job with no real evidence is nothing more than an uneducated assumption. Gravitational collapses alone can thrust materials hundreds of feet to the side given the side of the building. When the towers fell, do you think all the material would have went straigh downward? No.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
please refer me to one other building collapse that has occurred in history that came down like the towers did. I have seen plenty of controlled demolitions and that's how it appeared to me. Don't know where you received schooling but gravity does not cause explosion. The buildings, at worst should have toppled or maybe the top part would fall off the rest of the building. Physics doesn't allow for this collapse as it happened.
IonicStormFront 3 years ago
Elevator shaft or stairwell would be my guess...something that just has more concrete than other parts of the structure.
drotelli 3 years ago
Thanks for your comments. I want to get a larger sampling of comments before I discuss this any further.
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago
Looks like nothing more to me than a piece of the outer structure of WTC1, that's being blasted & pulverized by some sort of explosives.
What's ur point?
Sandberg1972 3 years ago
My point is that it is not part of the OUTER structure...it's part of the core....and it's NOT steel...it appears to be a huge piece of reinforced concrete. If that is true, then FEMA and NIST have some explaining to do and we need to see some REAL plans for these buildings. I contend the tower cores were not entirely made of STEEL and the official story of weakened core columns is 100% BOGUS...
FreshKillsJustice 3 years ago