As far as Science is concerned, nobody should ignore the Ultimate Role of Evolution of Languages and Evolution of Religions in Major Evolution of Mankind. Survival of the Fittest of Mankind relies 100% on both evolutions as both are part of the Major Evolution by means of Natural Selection in working order. For both that make us all Human” now. Otherwise all of you remain “Ape”like look, because nobody realizes that Sexual Activity between closest family members is "Technically Incorrect".
Mr Dawkins Rules NOTHING, World Scientists Rule, Visit the Website in flesh, type godsurety . org directly on your browser. Science has proven that "God" does exist, yes, the One who made decision to put everything in order so that we see it as it is, and we are meant to have a freewill to make any "Individual Selection". Spread The News to all Your Friends. get F.O.C Update of Science, Mr Dawkins is sooooooooo out of date, backward, stupid, as Old saying: little knowledge is dangerous.
Childish. He is making a good point, and you aren't (atleast aren't acting), intelligent enough to see the point behind the "Funny face and sounds he's making". That is reminiscent of a preschooler.
@BarrioAztrologist89 He's right in that if you breath loud you sound like a chimp? Oh my God, what an utter genius! A 4 year old could tell you the same.
@yrusodumbwhy Oh, I didn't know you were one of those people. Yeah, keep thumbs upping your comments. What a loser. Does it make you feel better when you feel like you have the support of the community? Lol, I actually feel sorry for you if this is what you do.
@yrusodumbwhy What? Is this your reaction when you get caught? You just add up a bunch of silly words to make it seem like you're borderline retarded, so I end up going away and leaving you to your cry for attention? You seriously need help.
@MetalDoneMoreForME Because he is the front runner of a false theory which does not apply to the natural function of living organisms in reality. I mean, it is stupid to deny complexity and intelligent design, especially when looking at living anatomy, conscience, emotions, music etc all appeared from nowhere and life including the universe just happened to exist, function and operate in constant order and motion without any form of intelligence or logic behind that.
@theaccousticaddict i deny it, i'm not stupid, give me one reason why you think that we were designed by an intelligent being? there is no real proof for intelligent design and the 2nd chromosome in humans is enough to prove evolution and a common ancestry between us and modern apes/chimps. it is a coincidence and chance that anything even resembles order (which it doesn't) otherwise there would be no asteroids/comets colliding with planets, we are one of many, MANY planets we are...
@MetalDoneMoreForME "give me one reason why you think that we were designed by an intelligent being?"
The level of complexity, especially of living anatomy, can only be sourced or created from an intelligent source who had a pre concieved idea of how living organisms should be. We also possess parts which enables us to live, without them survival would be a difficult task, like the nose and lungs for respiration etc. Saying that this is random chance is stupid and ignorant.
@theaccousticaddict saying that all of that was created is stupid and ignorant because you are ignoring evolution, you cannot ever give me any evidence for a being that created everything. so even in the bible the things about having concubines and slavery, and stoning disobedient children and damning an entire human race for the acts of 2 amoral beings (amoral=the lack of knowledge of right and wrong) not immoral but amoral. and someone capable of putting billions of animals and insects...
@MetalDoneMoreForME "you cannot ever give me any evidence for a being that created everything."
One step at a time, we are still in the process of establishing that compexity is a product of intelligent design, let's deal with that first before jumping to the next level.
@theaccousticaddict (cont.) on an ark that was on the ocean whilst it rained for 40 days and 40 nights and covered mount everest which would kill all plantlife and most sealife due to the saltwater and freshwater mixing and changes in sea temperature, so how would the animals get fed and what would they eat after the flood if all plantlife is extinct?
@MetalDoneMoreForME "so how would the animals get fed and what would they eat after the flood if all plantlife is extinct?"
Well, that was left for God, just because it sounds impossible to you does not mean it is impossible for him to do. He always makes a way out. He created the whole universe is 6 days, so providing food for a few animals may not have been a problem.
@theaccousticaddict that one in a -insert large number here- and there is still more planets being found everyday as well as new galaxies. evolution has mountains of evidence such as the fossil records which was NOT placed by the devil, you base your hypothesis on intelligent design on a hugely contradictory book that is illogical and wrong, all the bible is is literature to be studied, not worshipped as truth.
@MetalDoneMoreForME "Evolution has mountains of evidence such as the fossil records"
Well that counts for nothing considering that fossils are not transitional as it is claimed to be, they are nothing more than remnants of dead animals and cant be used as valuable evidence for anything. "you base your hypothesis on intelligent design on a hugely contradictory book"
No, I base it on the complex anatomy of living organisms, coded nature of DNA etc, those suggests ID.
@MetalDoneMoreForME "all the bible is is literature to be studied, not worshipped as truth."
Well, that is your own opinion of what the bible is, and it literally counts for nothing especially considering the fact that you are not a christian, know nothing about God and spirituality and even lacks an understanding of your place in nature.
The bible is the only truthful book in the universe that is why even after more than 2,000 years, it still survives.
@theaccousticaddict saying that something resembles order does not mean it does, it may be completely out of order to any other life form, motion is not proven since there are theories that we are all made of base atoms that flash in and out of existence an inconceivably large amount of times a second in different places to resemble motion since you can never actually find a point where one thing moves to another place but rather you can see still images of one thing in one place then...
@MetalDoneMoreForME "saying that something resembles order does not mean it does"
I did not use the word "resemble", it IS order, the rotation of the planets in constant motion, that is order. The continous division of days into morning and night, that is order.
Are you saying that the complexity of living anatomy and the fact that living organisms have body parts which they could not survive without is all an accident? random chance? I dont think so.
@theaccousticaddict "the rotation of the planets is order" and the fact that we have a perfect tilt on our axis, but guess what we have shook on our axis and that has created the sahara desert and plunged the earth into ice ages because we slightly wobbled on our axis. and have you heard of nevado del ruiz? a volcano in columbia that had plenty of warning signs but priests and the mayor of armero chose to ignore them and it killed between 22,500 and 25,000 people of that town alone.
@theaccousticaddict into another. emotions can be proven to be naturally occurring and can be measured chemically and physically and be shown how it can effect our survival skills, love helping us find a mate to carry on our genetics, grief to show us what happens when we don't pay attention (since it was rare that people would die of old age), empathy to help people in society and build as a species. all explainable by science. complexity has evolved over millions if not billions of years...
@MetalDoneMoreForME "emotions can be proven to be naturally occurring and can be measured chemically and physically and be shown how it can effect our survival skills"
I am not denying all that, but what is the origin of emotions? Did it fall from the sky? Maybe from coakroaches? where.
"all explainable by science"
Listen dude, you dont need science to tell you what emotions are or how to express them. Secondly, there are no explanations as to origins.
@theaccousticaddict the origins of emotion, genetic mutation to provide chemical imbalances in the brain to positively affect our mates as to pass down through natural selection. and you cannot give me any valid evidence as to why it is order, it is random, it could appear to be order but thats what billions of years of evolution does to a species, increases complexity.
@MetalDoneMoreForME So in your own words, emotions, including love and happiness are all products of chemical imbalances? Love is a chemical product? Really? please tell me you are having a laugh.
@MetalDoneMoreForME "complexity has evolved over millions if not billions of years..."
That makes no sense, it sounds like a fairy tale, it is not a scientifically credible information based on research and experiments, its just a hypothesis, a presumption. Saying "compleity evolved..." does not explain the origins of complexity, it rather sounds like an excuse provided as subtitute for the truth.
@theaccousticaddict it is not an excuse, there was no origin for complexity i mean we have evolved and become more complex over billions of years and there are plenty of ways to tell the earth is billions of years old and that biological matter is also old. you sound like someone who does not understand evolution, it does not sound anything like a fairy tale, evolution is fact but there are theorys of evolution.
Yes there is, according to evolution, life in its early stages was not complex, over years of evolutionary change it became complex. So if complexity was not there from the beginning except only from later stages, it must have come or be adopted from somewhere. I understand evolution and it sounds like a fairy tale
"Billions and billions of years ago.." sounds more like "Long time ago, far far away..." a fairy tale.
@theaccousticaddict it sounded like by origins of complexity you meant that all life was complex from the start, you clearly have no understanding of evolution, you are picking and choosing on what i say and taking what i say out of context, you are an imbecile and clearly lost on your understanding of what counts as evidence, this argument is over because you are so arrogant and stupid.
@MetalDoneMoreForME "music is something that we just happen to enjoy because it triggers emotions just like infra-sound can."
That does not offer an explosion as to the origins of these attributes. I know what music is, i also know what emotions are, but you guys are mistaken as to its origins.
Um does Mr Dawkins realise that his point is an assumption... and thus is not science. I'd like to see his EMPIRICAL evidence of this... Or does saying something make it true?
@sylobin Yet they do not claim to be a "scientific fact"... All I am asking is to judge a "scientific theory" with the rules of science itself. With no empirical basis then it doesn't fit the scientific method, (which requires empirical evidence).
@Gilbertus1986 what Mr.Dawkins is saying isnt a theory, he is in fact showing empirical evidence. All empirical means is evidence achieved by observation or experimentation.
by realising that we can make the same noise as our primate kin, sugests that we have similar vocal cords, this is an empirical observation, by studying the vocal cords in question and finding that the average the cord length to thickness ratio in primates is almost identical to humans is empirical evidence.
Dawkins makes an interesting point on the evolution of human speech. Quite intriguing....I shall ponder the dawn of mankind as we know it some more... *puts on novelty thinking sombrero*
@DrSpooglemon fuck you fucking atheist! your mother fucks and sucks cocks in trucks to get some bucks for buying rocks. may god have mercy on your soul...
This is what happens when you truly get involved ins Science. You don't give a fuck what an ignorant high schooler thinks about you. You just try to express your understanding in whatever medium expresses it best - English or chimpanzee vocalization.
@nylus100 - Why all the dislikes? 1. The title is misleading due to his poor use of video editing in an attempt to make Richard Dawkins look "insane". 2. The video description is attempting to accomplish the same thing. 3. We can assume the motive behind this is to degrade him most likely because this youtuber doesn't agree with him, yet does not address his position at all, as if he's trying to shield himself from everyone else. That's called being a coward.
Dawkins' worshippers take offense even when he is simply being made the subject of a joke. "THOU SHALT NOT LAUGH WHEN RICHARD DAWKINS MAKES FUNNY SOUNDS AND FACES!"
what? insane seriously? man! i've seen religious folks do real hideous stuff. if you call this insane then all religious folks out there are insane...
The real irony is that Dawkins is worshipped as a God by so many atheists. Even a video remotely seeming to mock is savagely attacked by his worshippers. Sounds abit like I dare I say it, religious fanaticism
@JQisAwesome What a stupid creationist and you have the fucking nerve to try and make Richard dawkins look stupid and you don't even know what a full stop is. You sir have no shame nor intelligence.
Dawkins has claimed, “As for religion … nobody wields a sharper bayonet than Sam Harris.” Harris debated Craig on 7th April. In his opening statement in that debate, Harris declared that Dr Craig is “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheists.” After that debate, the atheist website Debunking Christianity reported: “Bill (Craig) has once again showed himself as the best debater of this generation.” ROFL
The 'scientific' prophet is obviously psychotic. He would have done himself and society a favour having the episode of his sexual abuse by a religious teacher analyzed before embarking on his bizarre crusade, mixing science with opinion with trauma in an abominable blend vomited onto the collective.
Isn't it interesting how this posterboy of evolutionism and its vulgarisation is the best the system could come up with to impress the masses? Abysmal standards...
@suddenlyitsobvious lmao Dawkins is not the poster boy for evolutionism. He is speaking up for atheists, not evolutionists. There's a big difference. Even among theists, there are more who accept evolution theory compared to those who don't, you are actually a minority even among those who believe in God. Evolution is not same as atheism. Get that through your head, ok?
'He is speaking up for atheists, not evolutionists. There's a big difference'
And how does he JUSTIFY ATHEISM? With evolutionism of course.
The least we can say here is that the one certainly doesn't exclude the other.
I quite understand neodarwinist atheists always need to fragment everything, disconnect obvious links and keep everything perfectly in its own tidy box, but of course ONLY when it suits...
@suddenlyitsobvious "And how does he JUSTIFY ATHEISM? With evolutionism of course." => nope. That doesn't even make sense. Evolution speaks nothing about God. He only uses evolution to debunk creationism. Creationism is NOT same as religion. It is merely one MINORITY view among mainstream religions. Seriously, get it right. I'm not an atheist, but it is very INSULTING for you to think anybody who accepts evolution theory is an atheist.
' Evolution speaks nothing about God. He only uses evolution to debunk creationism. Creationism is NOT same as religion.'
Oh dear, how all kinds of us versus them categories and binaries have been programmed into you. Is that what you want to 'exchange', definitions?
Isn't it obvious that the narrative of evolution is being used CONSTANTLY and ROUTINELY by Dawkins -in the Selfish Gene fi- to exclude the existence of God or at the very least make this utterly unlikely?
That you like to think in the binary neodarwinist atheists versus creationists is YOUR privelege, but of course it's not you who's doing the thinking, it has been contextualized that way to engineer the debate.
Dawkins discredits organized religion as well as spirituality or the notion of God systematically so there's no reason for me to accept the artificial limitations you're trying to set up in falsely claiming Dawkins' target is solely 'creationism', because it then...
...becomes a topic of contention what precisely is covered by 'creationism' -another 'ism'.
Since Dawkins' discourse has a much wider application & is intended so, the category of 'creationism' is merely for your 'convenience' and there's no reason at all for me to accept it. My comments stand EXACTLY as they were formulated and I'm using clear terms & concepts -not fragmented definitional cult-speak.
So, you are denying Dawkins uses evolutionism routinely to push atheism...
@suddenlyitsobvious ok i see we have a misunderstanding- I DON'T deny Dawkins uses evolution to push atheism. But what you are doing is just as bad, in the opposite direction. You are promoting the idea as if any1 who is an evolutionist is an atheist. Maybe you don't mean that, but that's what you are coming off as across. If you don't mean that,then i suggest you phrase your words more carefully in the future, cuz from what i gather, you agree with me evolution is not atheism.
...dominant cult/religion today in society, and is therefore not perceived as such, but rather as some ABSOLUTE TRUTH -sort of like 'God' to the religious believer- it is obvious that the implications of the theory basically invalidate the tenets of the monotheistic religions AND have had the impact on society's members of instilling very serious doubt about the existence of God. It is naive to pretend, as you do, that the two can perfectly coexist. In fact, virtually everybody...
...today BELIEVES in evolutionism, exactly in the same fashion a bible belt bigot BELIEVES his minister and his bible.
Of course, the evolutionist BELIEVES that contrary to the christian, HE is basing himself on evidence, which is FALSE: in fact he is basing himself on the BELIEF that others have provided sufficient evidence to make their claims authoritative, WHILE NOT being in a position to check the process himself for lack of time, expertise, intellectual capacities and so on.
All those people or their ancestors who formerly BELIEVED the bible, today BELIEVE evolutionism and it cannot be denied that basically all atheists go by evolution: the two faiths are clearly in competition.
So of course, all sorts of compromises have been worked out, like intelligent design in order to marry both faiths, in the sense that whatever science claims is good, and the God claims are gonna have to be worked around that.
Some clever guys work out some compromises and you choose to BELIEVE THEM.
Sorry but things don't work that way. You can't have your cake and eat it too and believing NEVER works. It's knowledge and understanding that are required.
In short, the net impact of evolutionism is discrediting the monotheistic religions AND making God's existence suddenly very questionable, and all compromises that have been worked out are silly patchwork of clever egotists without an ounce of spiritual disposition, nor much honesty. People like Kent Hovind for instance are blatant manipulators, as bad as the evolutionist guru's, though probably a bit smarter.
Do such guys, such sold imposters need to 'save God' for you?
So I know that not everybody who believes in evolution is an atheist. However, every atheist with overwhelming probability will equally go by evolution and there's a very significant, almost but not quite axiomatic correlation between evolution and atheism.
The exceptions, as stated earlier, are largely disingenuous patchwork, certainly excluding an actual spiritual understanding.
I'll also point out this: what does it mean anyway when people say they're not atheists or ...
What's that phrase, 'believe in God'? What does it even mean? BELIEVE IN? Does this mean the believer believes he exists? What God? What's he like, like described in Genesis?
Countless people say they believe in something, some higher force, the energy or whatever. A kind of hazy feeling put into some mindless slogan that doesn't mean much at closer inspection.
An ACTUAL awareness of God completely invalidates evolutionism.
@suddenlyitsobvious Just because atheists use evolution to justify their position that doesn't mean evolution theory itself is associated with atheism. People who rob banks use guns, that don't mean guns are associated with robbers either. I fail to see your point. You seem to dance around the idea that evolution is bad for society, yet you also call theists like Hovind an idiot, so what are you? What do you personally believe in? Are you like some agnostic who don't care?
I'm convinced...Dawkins must have evolved from an ape. Sorry apes for the bad rap.
RememberPaulRevere 1 hour ago
That was actually worth watching....lol...
alaric63 3 hours ago
@TheAxis456 lol
DanielGlock26 7 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As far as Science is concerned, nobody should ignore the Ultimate Role of Evolution of Languages and Evolution of Religions in Major Evolution of Mankind. Survival of the Fittest of Mankind relies 100% on both evolutions as both are part of the Major Evolution by means of Natural Selection in working order. For both that make us all Human” now. Otherwise all of you remain “Ape”like look, because nobody realizes that Sexual Activity between closest family members is "Technically Incorrect".
Ordeal1000 13 hours ago
He raises a good point which I hadn't considered before. Makes perfect sense.
What's up with the guy that made this video? It's sad to see sheeple being socially policed to the point of becoming a complete dork. No offence.
Berrgk 1 day ago
Someone of retarded intellect would think this an insane conversation.
McBoxer6791 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mr Dawkins Rules NOTHING, World Scientists Rule, Visit the Website in flesh, type godsurety . org directly on your browser. Science has proven that "God" does exist, yes, the One who made decision to put everything in order so that we see it as it is, and we are meant to have a freewill to make any "Individual Selection". Spread The News to all Your Friends. get F.O.C Update of Science, Mr Dawkins is sooooooooo out of date, backward, stupid, as Old saying: little knowledge is dangerous.
Ordeal1000 1 day ago
Richard is Awesome!!!
nicholi100 2 days ago
shit must be borign in yoru house man
zakkattack99 2 days ago 5
the 2 top comments are the same? ah well, I guess this is my chance.
turbocpt1 4 days ago
@turbocpt1 Because some people need repetition to learn - I'm thumbing them both :p sorry!
Russ078188 4 days ago
JQisretard!
jmancipea 5 days ago
lame
nthnmonkeyirishwifey 5 days ago
Childish. He is making a good point, and you aren't (atleast aren't acting), intelligent enough to see the point behind the "Funny face and sounds he's making". That is reminiscent of a preschooler.
fraughtonaround 6 days ago
Like a chimpanzee, ha? Well, if that doesn't prove EVOLUTION I don't know what does ...
aboyborninjune 6 days ago
HAHAHA FUCKING HILARIOUS BUT GUESS WHAT???
HES RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!
BarrioAztrologist89 1 week ago 20
@BarrioAztrologist89 He's right in that if you breath loud you sound like a chimp? Oh my God, what an utter genius! A 4 year old could tell you the same.
TheAxis456 1 day ago
hahahahhahahahhaaha richard dawkins is my hero but this is fucking awesome ha
Kushburnindaily 1 week ago
Richard Dawkins is awesome.
CorellianSmuggler 1 week ago
VERY DISTURBED MAN!
Elvista77 1 week ago
I don't dislike videos very often, but this one I did. It is very misleading.
adamx20 1 week ago
...dude? do you hate him or something? why?
ryonafan 1 week ago
He hyperventiliates like that when he thinks about actually debating William Lane Craig.
He shits his pants too, but you can't smell that on video.
yrusodumbwhy 1 week ago
@yrusodumbwhy You sound like a true Christian.
karim3343 1 week ago
@karim3343 Did I say I'm a Christian you hypocritical bigoted fucktard????
Sheesh!!...You YT atheist bigots are so fucked-up.
yrusodumbwhy 1 week ago
@yrusodumbwhy Did I say you were a Christian you fucking moron? NO, I said you SOUND like one....
The implication is that through your stupid lack-of-value response, you espoused the same reactionary values that many Christians value.
Get it moron?
karim3343 1 week ago
@karim3343 No you punk-ass back-pedaling bitch. We all know what you were saying you hypocritical fucktarded dweeb.
We ALL get it moron.
yrusodumbwhy 1 week ago
@yrusodumbwhy Oh, I didn't know you were one of those people. Yeah, keep thumbs upping your comments. What a loser. Does it make you feel better when you feel like you have the support of the community? Lol, I actually feel sorry for you if this is what you do.
karim3343 1 week ago
@karim3343 A bullshit artist AND punk-ass back-pedaling bitch too! You got it ALL going on pussy.
And you've been pwned, bitch.
I hate fucking pompous hypocrites like you.
yrusodumbwhy 1 week ago
@yrusodumbwhy What? Is this your reaction when you get caught? You just add up a bunch of silly words to make it seem like you're borderline retarded, so I end up going away and leaving you to your cry for attention? You seriously need help.
karim3343 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@karim3343 No you punk-ass back-pedaling bitch. We all know what you were saying you hypocritical fucktarded dweeb.
We ALL get it moron.
yrusodumbwhy 1 week ago
@yrusodumbwhy You're an embarrassment to all agnostics.
karim3343 1 week ago
@karim3343 And you're a back-pedaling pussy.
yrusodumbwhy 1 week ago
@yrusodumbwhy Interesting response. You advocated a strong critique of my argument. Great job
karim3343 1 week ago
@karim3343 Thanks lame-ass back-pedaling pussy.
yrusodumbwhy 1 week ago
I don't think he's going insane... I think he's giving an example of what he means by deep breathing...
macsreviews 1 week ago
JQiswasome is one of the most stupid posters on you tube, get a life you moron
captain2ahab 1 week ago
JESUS
onehndrdprcntcreep 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thumb up if you think dawkins is right
Hfaik 2 weeks ago 11
More like Ritchard Dawkins sex noise.
DelightfullyBritish 2 weeks ago
Scumbag
kb26inla 2 weeks ago
Looks like he put a lot of practice into that...
TheSeventhCamera 2 weeks ago
Dawkins giving a blowjob would be more apropriate as a title!!
shoussam 2 weeks ago
Dawkins is the most delusional man alive
theaccousticaddict 2 weeks ago
@theaccousticaddict how?
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME Ask me a complete question, "How" does not make sense.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict ok then, How is Richard Dawkins the most delusional man alive?
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME Because he is the front runner of a false theory which does not apply to the natural function of living organisms in reality. I mean, it is stupid to deny complexity and intelligent design, especially when looking at living anatomy, conscience, emotions, music etc all appeared from nowhere and life including the universe just happened to exist, function and operate in constant order and motion without any form of intelligence or logic behind that.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict i deny it, i'm not stupid, give me one reason why you think that we were designed by an intelligent being? there is no real proof for intelligent design and the 2nd chromosome in humans is enough to prove evolution and a common ancestry between us and modern apes/chimps. it is a coincidence and chance that anything even resembles order (which it doesn't) otherwise there would be no asteroids/comets colliding with planets, we are one of many, MANY planets we are...
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME "give me one reason why you think that we were designed by an intelligent being?"
The level of complexity, especially of living anatomy, can only be sourced or created from an intelligent source who had a pre concieved idea of how living organisms should be. We also possess parts which enables us to live, without them survival would be a difficult task, like the nose and lungs for respiration etc. Saying that this is random chance is stupid and ignorant.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict saying that all of that was created is stupid and ignorant because you are ignoring evolution, you cannot ever give me any evidence for a being that created everything. so even in the bible the things about having concubines and slavery, and stoning disobedient children and damning an entire human race for the acts of 2 amoral beings (amoral=the lack of knowledge of right and wrong) not immoral but amoral. and someone capable of putting billions of animals and insects...
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME "you cannot ever give me any evidence for a being that created everything."
One step at a time, we are still in the process of establishing that compexity is a product of intelligent design, let's deal with that first before jumping to the next level.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict (cont.) on an ark that was on the ocean whilst it rained for 40 days and 40 nights and covered mount everest which would kill all plantlife and most sealife due to the saltwater and freshwater mixing and changes in sea temperature, so how would the animals get fed and what would they eat after the flood if all plantlife is extinct?
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME "so how would the animals get fed and what would they eat after the flood if all plantlife is extinct?"
Well, that was left for God, just because it sounds impossible to you does not mean it is impossible for him to do. He always makes a way out. He created the whole universe is 6 days, so providing food for a few animals may not have been a problem.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict oh and btw the last thing you said is a cop out.
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MetalDoneMoreForME "we are one of many, MANY planets we are..."
Yet our planet is the only planet that inhabits life. Chance? I dont think so.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict that one in a -insert large number here- and there is still more planets being found everyday as well as new galaxies. evolution has mountains of evidence such as the fossil records which was NOT placed by the devil, you base your hypothesis on intelligent design on a hugely contradictory book that is illogical and wrong, all the bible is is literature to be studied, not worshipped as truth.
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MetalDoneMoreForME "Evolution has mountains of evidence such as the fossil records"
Well that counts for nothing considering that fossils are not transitional as it is claimed to be, they are nothing more than remnants of dead animals and cant be used as valuable evidence for anything. "you base your hypothesis on intelligent design on a hugely contradictory book"
No, I base it on the complex anatomy of living organisms, coded nature of DNA etc, those suggests ID.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME "all the bible is is literature to be studied, not worshipped as truth."
Well, that is your own opinion of what the bible is, and it literally counts for nothing especially considering the fact that you are not a christian, know nothing about God and spirituality and even lacks an understanding of your place in nature.
The bible is the only truthful book in the universe that is why even after more than 2,000 years, it still survives.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict prove the bible is true
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict saying that something resembles order does not mean it does, it may be completely out of order to any other life form, motion is not proven since there are theories that we are all made of base atoms that flash in and out of existence an inconceivably large amount of times a second in different places to resemble motion since you can never actually find a point where one thing moves to another place but rather you can see still images of one thing in one place then...
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME "saying that something resembles order does not mean it does"
I did not use the word "resemble", it IS order, the rotation of the planets in constant motion, that is order. The continous division of days into morning and night, that is order.
Are you saying that the complexity of living anatomy and the fact that living organisms have body parts which they could not survive without is all an accident? random chance? I dont think so.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict "the rotation of the planets is order" and the fact that we have a perfect tilt on our axis, but guess what we have shook on our axis and that has created the sahara desert and plunged the earth into ice ages because we slightly wobbled on our axis. and have you heard of nevado del ruiz? a volcano in columbia that had plenty of warning signs but priests and the mayor of armero chose to ignore them and it killed between 22,500 and 25,000 people of that town alone.
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict into another. emotions can be proven to be naturally occurring and can be measured chemically and physically and be shown how it can effect our survival skills, love helping us find a mate to carry on our genetics, grief to show us what happens when we don't pay attention (since it was rare that people would die of old age), empathy to help people in society and build as a species. all explainable by science. complexity has evolved over millions if not billions of years...
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME "emotions can be proven to be naturally occurring and can be measured chemically and physically and be shown how it can effect our survival skills"
I am not denying all that, but what is the origin of emotions? Did it fall from the sky? Maybe from coakroaches? where.
"all explainable by science"
Listen dude, you dont need science to tell you what emotions are or how to express them. Secondly, there are no explanations as to origins.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict the origins of emotion, genetic mutation to provide chemical imbalances in the brain to positively affect our mates as to pass down through natural selection. and you cannot give me any valid evidence as to why it is order, it is random, it could appear to be order but thats what billions of years of evolution does to a species, increases complexity.
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME So in your own words, emotions, including love and happiness are all products of chemical imbalances? Love is a chemical product? Really? please tell me you are having a laugh.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME "complexity has evolved over millions if not billions of years..."
That makes no sense, it sounds like a fairy tale, it is not a scientifically credible information based on research and experiments, its just a hypothesis, a presumption. Saying "compleity evolved..." does not explain the origins of complexity, it rather sounds like an excuse provided as subtitute for the truth.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict it is not an excuse, there was no origin for complexity i mean we have evolved and become more complex over billions of years and there are plenty of ways to tell the earth is billions of years old and that biological matter is also old. you sound like someone who does not understand evolution, it does not sound anything like a fairy tale, evolution is fact but there are theorys of evolution.
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@MetalDoneMoreForME "there was no origin for complexity"
Yes there is, according to evolution, life in its early stages was not complex, over years of evolutionary change it became complex. So if complexity was not there from the beginning except only from later stages, it must have come or be adopted from somewhere. I understand evolution and it sounds like a fairy tale
"Billions and billions of years ago.." sounds more like "Long time ago, far far away..." a fairy tale.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict it sounded like by origins of complexity you meant that all life was complex from the start, you clearly have no understanding of evolution, you are picking and choosing on what i say and taking what i say out of context, you are an imbecile and clearly lost on your understanding of what counts as evidence, this argument is over because you are so arrogant and stupid.
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
@theaccousticaddict music is something that we just happen to enjoy because it triggers emotions just like infra-sound can.
MetalDoneMoreForME 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MetalDoneMoreForME "music is something that we just happen to enjoy because it triggers emotions just like infra-sound can."
That does not offer an explosion as to the origins of these attributes. I know what music is, i also know what emotions are, but you guys are mistaken as to its origins.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MetalDoneMoreForMEmusic is something that we just happen to enjoy because it triggers emotions just like infra-sound can.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MetalDoneMoreForME "music is something that we just happen to enjoy because it triggers emotions just like infra-sound can."
That does not offer an explanation as to the origins of emotions and music.
theaccousticaddict 1 week ago
Why hasn't this been remixed?!
Scwirul 2 weeks ago
Oh geez, that was funny, but inaccurate title forced me to thumb down, but funny vid.
Blake4014 3 weeks ago
Very funny haha
MrCoolhandLucas 3 weeks ago
I actually laughed when he try to say viewer discretion
soldoutrules 3 weeks ago
fantastic video, loved it, so funny. When you were laughing whilst trying to narrate, this made it even funnier.
Keep up the good work.
MarvinsKitchen 3 weeks ago
at least muslims and christians and jews need to come to gether to put a stop to Evolution darwinisam crap
khal540 3 weeks ago
u can tell what his mum was hahahahhahahahahha
khal540 3 weeks ago
Um does Mr Dawkins realise that his point is an assumption... and thus is not science. I'd like to see his EMPIRICAL evidence of this... Or does saying something make it true?
Gilbertus1986 3 weeks ago
@Gilbertus1986 i could say the same thing about the people that wrote the torah, Qur'an and the bible
sylobin 3 weeks ago
@sylobin Yet they do not claim to be a "scientific fact"... All I am asking is to judge a "scientific theory" with the rules of science itself. With no empirical basis then it doesn't fit the scientific method, (which requires empirical evidence).
Gilbertus1986 3 weeks ago
@Gilbertus1986 what Mr.Dawkins is saying isnt a theory, he is in fact showing empirical evidence. All empirical means is evidence achieved by observation or experimentation.
by realising that we can make the same noise as our primate kin, sugests that we have similar vocal cords, this is an empirical observation, by studying the vocal cords in question and finding that the average the cord length to thickness ratio in primates is almost identical to humans is empirical evidence.
sylobin 2 weeks ago
@Gilbertus1986 Ask that question to a Christian. See how well it goes for you.
jreed136 3 weeks ago
@Gilbertus1986 good point. they say it's based on fact but i cant see any so far for evolution. hmmmmm, interesting
BritishJamaican777 3 weeks ago
@BritishJamaican777 Thanks, its a shame not many others are willing to admit this simple fact.
Gilbertus1986 3 weeks ago
youre a piece of shit
simonsta 3 weeks ago
goes insnae? why cos he's demonstrating chimpanzee breathing to make his point? yeah that's totally fucking fruitloops.... prick.
TobeUK 3 weeks ago
Another scan the dislikes bar before watching video. (vote up)
trancehi 4 weeks ago
and?
whiterabit09 4 weeks ago
He's explaining Evolution of Apes to Humans..
Only a Retarded Creationist might find this funny.
forgottenmemories63 1 month ago
wow, a ridiculously desperate attempt to slander a sensible and intelligent man. Stupid people are so clever...
beetbop1231 1 month ago
Furthermore, he is panting to make a scientific point. You are a fuckin idiot, please kill yourself.
OnkelStein 1 month ago
What would Jesus say to all these hating Christians on the internet? None of you seem to be able to turn the other cheek.
OnkelStein 1 month ago
not funny at all.
HemikaDestroy 1 month ago
Dawkins makes an interesting point on the evolution of human speech. Quite intriguing....I shall ponder the dawn of mankind as we know it some more... *puts on novelty thinking sombrero*
CrazyHorse493 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some people want young white females to mix with non-white males.
I made a one-minute video highlighting a very small sample of race-mixing advertisements.
I love white people, and I am opposed to race-mixing. But I do not hate non-whites.
If you click on my name “awhitesoul2012” highlighted in blue below this comment, you can watch my video.
Thanks.
awhitesoul2012 1 month ago
That's funny! And the voice at the beginning pretending to try not to laugh made it even funnier!
BingoGIggleGoober 1 month ago
I must have missed something... Where's the insanity?
dwkjo 1 month ago
JQisNotAwesome. JQisaEejit who can't even set up a clip without appreciating his own ass off. But I guess someone had to.
manthasagittarius1 1 month ago
Block user people. Block user. Go to his channel and block user. Enough people do it his account will be shut down...
DrSpooglemon 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DrSpooglemon fuck you fucking atheist! your mother fucks and sucks cocks in trucks to get some bucks for buying rocks. may god have mercy on your soul...
diekontrolleure 1 month ago
I can imagine him looking at a Monet and going "Why!! The guy don' know how to paint ! It's all smudgy. I cant see nothin'." :D
Mission532 1 month ago
And the "full stop" comment is just freakin' priceless !! ROFL :D
Mission532 1 month ago
This is what happens when you truly get involved ins Science. You don't give a fuck what an ignorant high schooler thinks about you. You just try to express your understanding in whatever medium expresses it best - English or chimpanzee vocalization.
Mission532 1 month ago
I found this hilarious, I don't know why it was so disliked. I'm still laughing XD
TenaciousSkaven 1 month ago
An interesting account by Richard of how language may have evolved. Can't see any big joke, sorry. But I can see how a silly person might.
MrJuno6 1 month ago
@MrJuno6 Americans...
Babs44sun 1 month ago
why all the dislikes? athiests need to cheer up and laugh a little
nylus100 1 month ago
@nylus100 - Why all the dislikes? 1. The title is misleading due to his poor use of video editing in an attempt to make Richard Dawkins look "insane". 2. The video description is attempting to accomplish the same thing. 3. We can assume the motive behind this is to degrade him most likely because this youtuber doesn't agree with him, yet does not address his position at all, as if he's trying to shield himself from everyone else. That's called being a coward.
Critic863 1 month ago
I laughed when the guy reading started laughing.
JFHardman 1 month ago
he's losing his mind. lmao
lynnmist123 1 month ago
Dawkins' worshippers take offense even when he is simply being made the subject of a joke. "THOU SHALT NOT LAUGH WHEN RICHARD DAWKINS MAKES FUNNY SOUNDS AND FACES!"
direwill 1 month ago
what? insane seriously? man! i've seen religious folks do real hideous stuff. if you call this insane then all religious folks out there are insane...
shongrocks1622 1 month ago
The real irony is that Dawkins is worshipped as a God by so many atheists. Even a video remotely seeming to mock is savagely attacked by his worshippers. Sounds abit like I dare I say it, religious fanaticism
GT45000 1 month ago
@GT45000 Exactly!
justinosmond 1 month ago
Oooo...the heavy breathing got me hot.
TomVodkaCollins 1 month ago
I can't believe I actually let this get to 0:20 before shutting it off.
KhazWolf 1 month ago
a very mature video.
Shabz131 1 month ago
This is so funny!
cemalson 1 month ago
Comment removed
cemalson 1 month ago
It is an unfortunate fact that the guy who made this video is less intelligent than a Homo Erectus.
banasikerimdemeabi 1 month ago
paused when i saw the dislike bar, moving on lol
YOYOdaMOOSE 1 month ago 43
This has been flagged as spam show
@YOYOdaMOOSE Let me FTFY: "paused when i saw the dislike bar, left a retarded comment with no capitalization, moving on lol"
JQisAwesome 1 month ago
@JQisAwesome Let me think about your assinine comment while I reach for the dislike button....
krackersdave 1 month ago
@JQisAwesome This is in a youtube comments section, who really gives a fuck.
kinkykane0607 1 month ago
@JQisAwesome You do realise, the irony, that you didn't use a full stop?
Eralun 1 month ago 15
@Eralun What do you mean, "full stop?"
JQisAwesome 1 month ago
@JQisAwesome
Ah balls, I didn't mean to put "?".
Eralun 1 month ago
@JQisAwesome Ah, the infinite stupidity of Americans. He meant 'period', you dumb fuck.
TheBurmanUnicorn 1 month ago
@JQisAwesome What a stupid creationist and you have the fucking nerve to try and make Richard dawkins look stupid and you don't even know what a full stop is. You sir have no shame nor intelligence.
BBC1146 1 month ago
@Eralun iTs the InTerWebZ We cAn TyPee hOw we WANtz U FUckING Grammar NAZi
MrBigcurt76 1 month ago
@MrBigcurt76 lol, okay....I was pointing out the irony of him correcting some one on their grammar, while his was wrong too.
So it true internet form.
U mad bro?
Eralun 1 month ago
@Eralun so mad.
MrBigcurt76 1 month ago
@MrBigcurt76 You said "grammar Nazi" ROTFLMAO
splicedenergy 1 month ago
@splicedenergy yeah....
MrBigcurt76 1 month ago
@JQisAwesome - I do believe you forgot a period at the end of your sentence.
Critic863 1 month ago
If this is intended to discredit Dawkins then describing this as clutching at straws is an overstatement.
195ashes 1 month ago
Nice to see the poor arguments against richard dawkins =)
Supermats1987 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dawkins has claimed, “As for religion … nobody wields a sharper bayonet than Sam Harris.” Harris debated Craig on 7th April. In his opening statement in that debate, Harris declared that Dr Craig is “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheists.” After that debate, the atheist website Debunking Christianity reported: “Bill (Craig) has once again showed himself as the best debater of this generation.” ROFL
RosesOfTimes 1 month ago
when you describe things, that makes you mental? go read a book or watch a documentary- dont glog up the web with detritus.
jamescat1 1 month ago
Nah, Dawkins is moron lol
RosesOfTimes 1 month ago
Dawkins is a liar
RosesOfTimes 1 month ago
@RosesOfTimes I have to argue that in fact he is quite the opposite. He has stated that he is passionate about the truth.
redlynx69 1 month ago
@RosesOfTimes 666 hail fucking satan!!!!! ave sathanas dom
bizarewigga 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A cult is a religion with no political power.Tom Wolfe
Nietzschean1000 1 month ago
I dunno, he sounded like my dog after he licks his balls and chases the cat.
jimu57 1 month ago 2
The 'scientific' prophet is obviously psychotic. He would have done himself and society a favour having the episode of his sexual abuse by a religious teacher analyzed before embarking on his bizarre crusade, mixing science with opinion with trauma in an abominable blend vomited onto the collective.
Isn't it interesting how this posterboy of evolutionism and its vulgarisation is the best the system could come up with to impress the masses? Abysmal standards...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious lmao Dawkins is not the poster boy for evolutionism. He is speaking up for atheists, not evolutionists. There's a big difference. Even among theists, there are more who accept evolution theory compared to those who don't, you are actually a minority even among those who believe in God. Evolution is not same as atheism. Get that through your head, ok?
Casshyr 1 month ago
@Casshyr
'Dawkins is not the poster boy for evolutionism.'
Pfft. Of course he is.
'He is speaking up for atheists, not evolutionists. There's a big difference'
And how does he JUSTIFY ATHEISM? With evolutionism of course.
The least we can say here is that the one certainly doesn't exclude the other.
I quite understand neodarwinist atheists always need to fragment everything, disconnect obvious links and keep everything perfectly in its own tidy box, but of course ONLY when it suits...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious "And how does he JUSTIFY ATHEISM? With evolutionism of course." => nope. That doesn't even make sense. Evolution speaks nothing about God. He only uses evolution to debunk creationism. Creationism is NOT same as religion. It is merely one MINORITY view among mainstream religions. Seriously, get it right. I'm not an atheist, but it is very INSULTING for you to think anybody who accepts evolution theory is an atheist.
Casshyr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Casshyr
' Evolution speaks nothing about God. He only uses evolution to debunk creationism. Creationism is NOT same as religion.'
Oh dear, how all kinds of us versus them categories and binaries have been programmed into you. Is that what you want to 'exchange', definitions?
Isn't it obvious that the narrative of evolution is being used CONSTANTLY and ROUTINELY by Dawkins -in the Selfish Gene fi- to exclude the existence of God or at the very least make this utterly unlikely?
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@Casshyr
That you like to think in the binary neodarwinist atheists versus creationists is YOUR privelege, but of course it's not you who's doing the thinking, it has been contextualized that way to engineer the debate.
Dawkins discredits organized religion as well as spirituality or the notion of God systematically so there's no reason for me to accept the artificial limitations you're trying to set up in falsely claiming Dawkins' target is solely 'creationism', because it then...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@Casshyr
...becomes a topic of contention what precisely is covered by 'creationism' -another 'ism'.
Since Dawkins' discourse has a much wider application & is intended so, the category of 'creationism' is merely for your 'convenience' and there's no reason at all for me to accept it. My comments stand EXACTLY as they were formulated and I'm using clear terms & concepts -not fragmented definitional cult-speak.
So, you are denying Dawkins uses evolutionism routinely to push atheism...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious ok i see we have a misunderstanding- I DON'T deny Dawkins uses evolution to push atheism. But what you are doing is just as bad, in the opposite direction. You are promoting the idea as if any1 who is an evolutionist is an atheist. Maybe you don't mean that, but that's what you are coming off as across. If you don't mean that,then i suggest you phrase your words more carefully in the future, cuz from what i gather, you agree with me evolution is not atheism.
Casshyr 1 month ago
@Casshyr
'You are promoting the idea as if any1 who is an evolutionist is an atheist.'
No I'm not. You're not reading carefully. I was observing what Dawkins is promoting in society.
' Maybe you don't mean that, but that's what you are coming off as across.'
I suggest you simply process my actual discourse.
And no, the phrase 'posterboy for evolution' isn't too general or ambiguous, and I'm not using it by accident.
Look, it's very simple: even though evolutionism is a...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@Casshyr
...dominant cult/religion today in society, and is therefore not perceived as such, but rather as some ABSOLUTE TRUTH -sort of like 'God' to the religious believer- it is obvious that the implications of the theory basically invalidate the tenets of the monotheistic religions AND have had the impact on society's members of instilling very serious doubt about the existence of God. It is naive to pretend, as you do, that the two can perfectly coexist. In fact, virtually everybody...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@Casshyr
...today BELIEVES in evolutionism, exactly in the same fashion a bible belt bigot BELIEVES his minister and his bible.
Of course, the evolutionist BELIEVES that contrary to the christian, HE is basing himself on evidence, which is FALSE: in fact he is basing himself on the BELIEF that others have provided sufficient evidence to make their claims authoritative, WHILE NOT being in a position to check the process himself for lack of time, expertise, intellectual capacities and so on.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@Casshyr
All those people or their ancestors who formerly BELIEVED the bible, today BELIEVE evolutionism and it cannot be denied that basically all atheists go by evolution: the two faiths are clearly in competition.
So of course, all sorts of compromises have been worked out, like intelligent design in order to marry both faiths, in the sense that whatever science claims is good, and the God claims are gonna have to be worked around that.
It becomes a question of: how can I maintain...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@Casshyr
...belief in God while going by evolution.
Some clever guys work out some compromises and you choose to BELIEVE THEM.
Sorry but things don't work that way. You can't have your cake and eat it too and believing NEVER works. It's knowledge and understanding that are required.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@Casshyr
In short, the net impact of evolutionism is discrediting the monotheistic religions AND making God's existence suddenly very questionable, and all compromises that have been worked out are silly patchwork of clever egotists without an ounce of spiritual disposition, nor much honesty. People like Kent Hovind for instance are blatant manipulators, as bad as the evolutionist guru's, though probably a bit smarter.
Do such guys, such sold imposters need to 'save God' for you?
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@Casshyr
So I know that not everybody who believes in evolution is an atheist. However, every atheist with overwhelming probability will equally go by evolution and there's a very significant, almost but not quite axiomatic correlation between evolution and atheism.
The exceptions, as stated earlier, are largely disingenuous patchwork, certainly excluding an actual spiritual understanding.
I'll also point out this: what does it mean anyway when people say they're not atheists or ...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@Casshyr
...that they 'believe in God'?
What's that phrase, 'believe in God'? What does it even mean? BELIEVE IN? Does this mean the believer believes he exists? What God? What's he like, like described in Genesis?
Countless people say they believe in something, some higher force, the energy or whatever. A kind of hazy feeling put into some mindless slogan that doesn't mean much at closer inspection.
An ACTUAL awareness of God completely invalidates evolutionism.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious Just because atheists use evolution to justify their position that doesn't mean evolution theory itself is associated with atheism. People who rob banks use guns, that don't mean guns are associated with robbers either. I fail to see your point. You seem to dance around the idea that evolution is bad for society, yet you also call theists like Hovind an idiot, so what are you? What do you personally believe in? Are you like some agnostic who don't care?
Casshyr 1 month ago