Some of the murders by the German BND, the ex GESTAPO, known to the public:
Uwe Barschel (politician), Jürgen Möllemann (politician), Heiner Gehring (author), Martina Pflock (political activist), Tron (internet activist), Karl Koch (political/internet activist), Bernd Seiffert (human rights activist), Kirsten Heisig (author/judge), Fritz Bauer (persecutor of the Frankfurt Auschwitz processes), Markus Bott (human rights activist).
Google the names and check out my channel and homepage.
The male tanks had two 6 pounder naval guns, but only could hit their targets if they stopped. The female tanks only carried machine guns. The first models of both types didn't have a machine gun in front. Winston Churchill was the main man pushing for tanks to be developed for the western front even though he was First Lord of the Admiralty at the time. They were first used in Sept. 1916 during the Battle of the Somme.
Many people think that tanks won world war 1. Tanks actually sucked in world war 1they were big, extremley slow, could get bogged down in holes easily, were very dangerous to the crew inside, driver and gunners could barely see a thing, and barely could even makit to enemy trenches the only thing that made them good was that they couldnt be punctured by bullets and they just scared the shit out of people.
@EmkobAllianceForce1 They helped win, though what you say is some what true the German high command over estimated them and felt with the new British tanks the war was lost. The over main reason for their defeat was a series mines under the German trenches packed with explosives followed by a series of mass explosions accross the western front from the British trenches. The effects are still visible today I myself have witnessed these first hand! Many even formed large ponds and lakes!
I am most gald I never had to fight in one of those.
FYI, the crew of the MK1 was actually 8. Its took a total of 4 people to drive it. One to operate the main clutch and gears, one the brakes, two the secondary gears and 4 gunners.
The only reason they stuck a big hole in that replica was to let him breathe. In WW1 the tank was just a shell with no compartments like the campertments in ww2 tanks and later. There was also no ventilation. So the inside of the tank could reach 50 degrees celsius and the crew were breathing the fumes from the engine directly. There was also no suspension. And if a or bullet hit the tank it would make a deafening noise and a bunch of metal on the inside would fragment and bounce
@airsoftswatclub Could joke about having boobs or bigger backside, but like airsoft said. the side sponsons are different. The 'female' was aremed with machine guns only ( no 6 pdr's ), so didn't need the sponsons as big on each side.
Females had a different armenent (machine gun), and weighed almost the same. They both had the same armour thickness, and in no way was the female weaker. In fact, they were bigger killers, because machine guns can get more people than a cannon can.
@airsoftswatclub the female tank to this 1 is hard to start, tempramental.needs an oil change every month due to a leaky sump,noisey, makes more noise than movment and lastly hard to steer, it contradicts every choice you make lol :)
The British called them "tanks" after they invented them because originally they were top secret and were shipped to the war front in France in crates marked "Water Tanks For Mesopotamia."
I've seen it with my eyes. It's 1:1 scale except in length where it's 2:3 scale. There are two people in the front position, which is how many the original had inside the front position
true enough but iv'e seen footage of the original MkVs, having 2 ppl in front doesnt mean it's up to scale esp since the treacks themselfs measured enough to hold one and half more person widh-wise.
Not to nit-pick, and I know you already know, but this is Historicaly inaccurate. The nose horns are too short, the front plate completely different, and it has a PORTHOLE!? The guns are out of proportion, and the tracks are WAAAY to tall for its length. completely out of prortion. But it isstill amaziong to see it go! Whoever did this should be proud anyway.
Would they realy see out of the vision slits and loop holes, or would they use that port hole thing?
Do you mean the porthole on the vertical plate between the horns? I believe that's ventilation for the engine.
Yes, on a 'real' one they'd look out of the hatches/vision slits etc - although they don't look particularly good for observation, when your eyes are up close you can get a fairly good view
1:1 - omg you looney, i would if i had a big garage but all my toys have to drive through my terrace house so 1:6th it has to be, congrats though, i must see it somewhen
Male tanks were armed with two six pounder cannon, one in each sponson at the side, as well as having supplementary machine guns. Female's were only armed with machine guns
No, it's a male. The cannon were in sponsons. None of the British WW1 tanks had a cannon on top of the vehicle, except experiments with the first one, 'Little Willy'
Yeah don't follow Indiana Jones version that was just to make it look cooler but the only one that had turrets was the Mark VIII except the turret did not roll around and it had Browning Machine guns or Hotchkiss Machine guns on it
Think it's specially built - the reason it's shorter than originals is that it had to be as light as possible for use on a stage, then it was bought and repainted etc by the company that owns it
I would like to see more video on the tank.
bhill6563 1 month ago
Some of the murders by the German BND, the ex GESTAPO, known to the public:
Uwe Barschel (politician), Jürgen Möllemann (politician), Heiner Gehring (author), Martina Pflock (political activist), Tron (internet activist), Karl Koch (political/internet activist), Bernd Seiffert (human rights activist), Kirsten Heisig (author/judge), Fritz Bauer (persecutor of the Frankfurt Auschwitz processes), Markus Bott (human rights activist).
Google the names and check out my channel and homepage.
wwwtotalitaerde 4 months ago
Comment removed
wwwtotalitaerde 4 months ago
GrandPrix55 is right, the real name is "Armoured Track Layers"
SuperMrBentley 5 months ago
@armyguy1945
You call yourself an army guy and then claim that their lives were only about 4 minutes!
My great great grandfather fought alongside these beasts, the tanks kept going unfortunately he was blown up, no trace left...
samosammo123 6 months ago
Wow, slow down!
jimmyxx3 6 months ago
as the male stalkes his mate he gets a tingeling feeling inside he gets closer she dosent notice.......................you can write the rest
TheXcaliber223 6 months ago
This tank reminds me of Indiana Johnes ...
WOOOO IST JOOOOOOOOHNEEEES ?!?!?!!?!?!? :D
Go4omir 7 months ago
Its called a tank because the makers and anyone that saw it were told they were bullet proof tanks for transporting water to the front line.
NielsShoe 7 months ago
Its a male tank it has a dick.
BigMek456 7 months ago
personally this is probibally my favorite tank
sargentsnugglewolf92 7 months ago
I don't see any large artillery on this tank, only the coaxial machine guns, how is it male?
JtiksPies 8 months ago
The male tanks had two 6 pounder naval guns, but only could hit their targets if they stopped. The female tanks only carried machine guns. The first models of both types didn't have a machine gun in front. Winston Churchill was the main man pushing for tanks to be developed for the western front even though he was First Lord of the Admiralty at the time. They were first used in Sept. 1916 during the Battle of the Somme.
1916jutland 9 months ago
Male tanks crave a sandwich after climaxing. Also, they don't like to cuddle.
smithraymond09029 9 months ago
so it does have a machine gun in the front... cool
HRHooChicken 10 months ago
the male is bigger, has guns, and is resistant to small arms fire.
the female if small, has no guns and stays in the kitchen making the males sandwiches.
b2o4e 11 months ago 8
Now, thats a real Turtle my boy :)
7JDH7NL7 1 year ago
Many people think that tanks won world war 1. Tanks actually sucked in world war 1they were big, extremley slow, could get bogged down in holes easily, were very dangerous to the crew inside, driver and gunners could barely see a thing, and barely could even makit to enemy trenches the only thing that made them good was that they couldnt be punctured by bullets and they just scared the shit out of people.
EmkobAllianceForce1 1 year ago
@EmkobAllianceForce1 Plus they were amazing propoganda material.
whowantsabighug 1 year ago
@EmkobAllianceForce1 They helped win, though what you say is some what true the German high command over estimated them and felt with the new British tanks the war was lost. The over main reason for their defeat was a series mines under the German trenches packed with explosives followed by a series of mass explosions accross the western front from the British trenches. The effects are still visible today I myself have witnessed these first hand! Many even formed large ponds and lakes!
samj5664 11 months ago
Hey did u use the same thick armour, or did you just did steel plates?
7JDH7NL7 1 year ago
Real speed too( 5 1/2 mph)
GeneralFryeman 1 year ago
"Male" Tanks have Cannons and "Female" Have machineguns
merdaporrenta 1 year ago
where is his dick?
nmgncross 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THUMBS UP
all listen up this is importend justin biebers ''never say never''
got much likes and almost no dislikes
we destroyed biebers baby but we need to destroy never say never
ALL ON 25 december DISLIKE JUSTIN BIEBERS NEVER SAY NEVER
comment and post as many vids u can
1makermovie 1 year ago
its a ground hog comming out of the hole
xXM16CLANGLITCHESXx 1 year ago
i wonder how fast would it go if you put the leopard 2A5's power plant into it
Giganaut233 1 year ago
@armyguy1945 My granfather was a Lewis gunner in the trenches and lived to tell the tale.
AbuAvital 1 year ago
@AbuAvital Wow thats cool thanks for sharing
tfoshohoe 1 year ago
Ich will auch so ein Auto !!!
oschitom 1 year ago
Actually isnt this the one from tanks4hire? Its built mainly out of plywood!
jonewer 1 year ago
I am most gald I never had to fight in one of those.
FYI, the crew of the MK1 was actually 8. Its took a total of 4 people to drive it. One to operate the main clutch and gears, one the brakes, two the secondary gears and 4 gunners.
jonewer 1 year ago
all over the hull injuring or killing the crew.
Arc9er 1 year ago
@armyguy1945
The only reason they stuck a big hole in that replica was to let him breathe. In WW1 the tank was just a shell with no compartments like the campertments in ww2 tanks and later. There was also no ventilation. So the inside of the tank could reach 50 degrees celsius and the crew were breathing the fumes from the engine directly. There was also no suspension. And if a or bullet hit the tank it would make a deafening noise and a bunch of metal on the inside would fragment and bounce
Arc9er 1 year ago
can i buy it on ebay?
thesmileykyle 1 year ago
whats the female tank look like
airsoftswatclub 1 year ago 49
@airsoftswatclub Same as the Male but the side sponsons were different
rlangham12 1 year ago 2
@rlangham12 holy poop i was just jokeing i didnt think it was real haha lol
airsoftswatclub 1 year ago
@rlangham12 were can I buy this and is it in a good price
axe11154 1 year ago
@rlangham12 i thought it has a vagina on it.
DeadMetalGraffiti 1 year ago
@rlangham12 Male had cannons, female only had machine guns.
IVANGROZNEY 1 year ago
@rlangham12 so the male climbs onto the female with those special tracks and then what do the baby tanks look like?
DjTommyKx 9 months ago
@airsoftswatclub Mgs instead of cannons
CoIdHeat 1 year ago
@airsoftswatclub they had MG's instead of Cannons.
Soundwave3591 1 year ago
@airsoftswatclub Could joke about having boobs or bigger backside, but like airsoft said. the side sponsons are different. The 'female' was aremed with machine guns only ( no 6 pdr's ), so didn't need the sponsons as big on each side.
roadstarman58 1 year ago
@airsoftswatclub female tanks were lights in armor and weaker.
khk0510 1 year ago
@khk0510 No.
Females had a different armenent (machine gun), and weighed almost the same. They both had the same armour thickness, and in no way was the female weaker. In fact, they were bigger killers, because machine guns can get more people than a cannon can.
whikless 1 year ago
@airsoftswatclub Differnet guns
DaManzMoney 1 year ago
@airsoftswatclub same as the male tank only with a vagina.
kyleisreallycool 1 year ago
@airsoftswatclub female tanks didnt have cannons
1529Johnny 11 months ago
@1529Johnny female were mg. while male were cannon iirc.... ?
cykadelik 10 months ago
@1529Johnny
Of course, they had. Female tanks had only machine-guns, but they were still armed.
Briselance 9 months ago
@airsoftswatclub
The male tank was armed with 2 six-pounders guns as main armament.
While the female had only 6 Lewis .30 cal machine-guns.
Briselance 9 months ago
@airsoftswatclub the female tank to this 1 is hard to start, tempramental.needs an oil change every month due to a leaky sump,noisey, makes more noise than movment and lastly hard to steer, it contradicts every choice you make lol :)
smallballz001 8 months ago
@airsoftswatclub the male has a beer stand and its counterpart has a samich stand
goodapplesdope 7 months ago
@airsoftswatclub
the female tank does not have theese cannons sticking out from the tank :D
MrOlekul 7 months ago
@airsoftswatclub
the same but the male's barrels are longer...
Vietcong01 6 months ago
@airsoftswatclub the same, the just never leave the kitchen
sweet58441 6 months ago
@airsoftswatclub
Wow! Would not want to change a tire on that Mother.
strangeandstranger1 2 months ago
@airsoftswatclub Females carried only machine guns, so the sponsons were smaller.
BeeryUSA 1 month ago
I've never heard that the life of a machine gunner was 4 minutes - where did you come across that?
rlangham12 2 years ago 3
@rlangham12 It was very short - artillery would always target them, so once 100 rounds had been fired the MGers had to GTFO and reposition.
baoender 9 months ago
The British called them "tanks" after they invented them because originally they were top secret and were shipped to the war front in France in crates marked "Water Tanks For Mesopotamia."
(Nottalottapeopleknowthat)
GrandPrix55 2 years ago 33
@GrandPrix55 I thought it was Petrograd
bonaparte60 7 months ago
@GrandPrix55
I wonder how big those crates were?
KingCommando32 6 months ago
that looks like an rc tank.
TheStrongBoyz19 2 years ago
1:1 scale, unless those guys inside are midgets
rlangham12 2 years ago
original Mk4s could take up to 5 people inside sooo i doubt its 1:1 scale.
Still its an impressive little tankie though.
Dinkomon 2 years ago 4
I've seen it with my eyes. It's 1:1 scale except in length where it's 2:3 scale. There are two people in the front position, which is how many the original had inside the front position
rlangham12 2 years ago
Plus, the original Mk IV's had a crew of 8
rlangham12 2 years ago
true enough but iv'e seen footage of the original MkVs, having 2 ppl in front doesnt mean it's up to scale esp since the treacks themselfs measured enough to hold one and half more person widh-wise.
Dinkomon 2 years ago
It is up to scale, because i've seen it, and i've also seen a real Mk IV Tank, and height and width wise they're the same size
rlangham12 2 years ago
Haha. It does look like a model though, probably because it's so fresh looking!
mrrmancunian 2 years ago
these tanks are the best design, i think.
RICKTICKY08 2 years ago
Not to nit-pick, and I know you already know, but this is Historicaly inaccurate. The nose horns are too short, the front plate completely different, and it has a PORTHOLE!? The guns are out of proportion, and the tracks are WAAAY to tall for its length. completely out of prortion. But it isstill amaziong to see it go! Whoever did this should be proud anyway.
Would they realy see out of the vision slits and loop holes, or would they use that port hole thing?
Maus5000 2 years ago
Do you mean the porthole on the vertical plate between the horns? I believe that's ventilation for the engine.
Yes, on a 'real' one they'd look out of the hatches/vision slits etc - although they don't look particularly good for observation, when your eyes are up close you can get a fairly good view
rlangham12 2 years ago
who cares he made a new type of tank and it kicks ass
Shaundi5 2 years ago
I think its like that because the image is squished vertically.
FalconKPD 2 years ago
SWEET!!!!
dadsad66 2 years ago
i love the gun on the side its awesome
isaiahthomas45678 2 years ago
There's one on the other side too
rlangham12 2 years ago
But weren't the Mark iV rhomboid?
rva1945 2 years ago
It is, the downward slope of the tracks at the front is slightly over emphasised due to the reduced length (2/3 of the original)
rlangham12 2 years ago
With the compacted length it resembles a Leman Russ chassis - minus the turret and lasgun. =P
Very cool replica, though.
Joaquin602001 2 years ago
NO the Leman Russ was Based off the WWI Tanks
vol009S 2 years ago
this IS a WWI tank, dude.
Joaquin602001 2 years ago
1:1 - omg you looney, i would if i had a big garage but all my toys have to drive through my terrace house so 1:6th it has to be, congrats though, i must see it somewhen
kieren451 2 years ago
why do things from the first world war look better then the second world war????
demonhorse103 2 years ago
sweet, i'm in shoreham, along the coast and i'm doing a mark 4 in 1:6th scale, what size is this one?
kieren451 2 years ago
1/1 scale - although length wise it's 2/3 scale
rlangham12 2 years ago
oh god those big bulky WWI tanks, really, who the hell designed that!!! Its a fucking parallelogram with treads, armor, and guns!!!
Bamchucknorris 2 years ago
they were designed to cross trenches, and they did that fairly well. William tritton played a large roll in designing it.
Maus5000 2 years ago
whats the diffrence betewen male and female tanks
Phil1796 2 years ago
Male tanks were armed with two six pounder cannon, one in each sponson at the side, as well as having supplementary machine guns. Female's were only armed with machine guns
rlangham12 2 years ago
Vickers machine guns.
calicheSCOT 2 years ago
Not neccessarily - only the Mk I and Mk II Tanks were fitted with Vickers machine guns
rlangham12 2 years ago
It's a british Female tank. The male had a cannon on the top.
madcapromanian 3 years ago
No, it's a male. The cannon were in sponsons. None of the British WW1 tanks had a cannon on top of the vehicle, except experiments with the first one, 'Little Willy'
rlangham12 3 years ago
LOL a gunner could just shoot the driver
CoolDog202 2 years ago
Yeah don't follow Indiana Jones version that was just to make it look cooler but the only one that had turrets was the Mark VIII except the turret did not roll around and it had Browning Machine guns or Hotchkiss Machine guns on it
vol009S 2 years ago
@vol009S the Indiana Jones tank was a complete replica, based on the Mark VIII, with a turret added to make it "more tank-like"
Soundwave3591 2 years ago
Yeah but at least it looked cool with a turret
vol009S 2 years ago
Do you know what it is built on? Bobcat? JCB?
philthydirtyanimal 3 years ago
Think it's specially built - the reason it's shorter than originals is that it had to be as light as possible for use on a stage, then it was bought and repainted etc by the company that owns it
rlangham12 3 years ago
che spettacolo lo vojo pure io x andacce in giro x strada!!
D3VILS83 3 years ago
Do you gave longer video of that ?
krepo71 3 years ago
Sorry, that's the longest one I have
rlangham12 3 years ago
ah i was at beauliea that weekend so i missed out on all the fun
UBIQUEROL 3 years ago