hey antisyncretism, consider yourself lucky that medieval/christian philosophy gets any of our precious time at all.
bishop berkeley, in so far as he was important/interesting, was not a christian philosopher either. descartes, kant, wittgenstein and many other philosophers were christians, but that does not make them christian philosophers. the term christian philosopher is a bit of an oxymoron anyways, no matter what aquinas says.
Apparently medieval philosophers are so unimportant that they can all be summed under one head with no real concentration on any one of them.
I'm guessing its because so many of them were Christian (discounting Averroes, Maimonides etc) the only time any Christian philosopher got any real time on this show was Berkley...and that was split with John Locke, its so stupid that this show keeps opting for more 'secular' philosophers over everyone else.
@Antisyncretism consider yourself lucky that medieval/christian philosophy gets any of our precious time at all.
bishop berkeley, in so far as he was important/interesting, was not a christian philosopher either. descartes, kant, wittgenstein and many other philosophers were christians, but that does not make them christian philosophers. the term christian philosopher is a bit of an oxymoron anyways, no matter what aquinas says.
@memoryburn7 no, I don't consider myself 'lucky' and the fact that you simply dismiss all of those philosophers such as Aquinas as ignorants betrays a naivety of the sophistication and importance of their thought. To say that Christian philosophy is an oxymoron is also very naive.
@memoryburn7 Nope. Descartes' philosophy was comitted to Christianity just as much Descartes was. Kant's categorical imperative is clearly derived from Jesus's 'Do unto others...', Wittgenstein, inasmuch as he refrains from preaching, clearly derives influence from Tolstoyan Christianity. Kierkegaard, Pascal... You can say what you want about the Christian church, but without them preserving and discussing it, we'd have had no Plato, no Aristotle and probably not a lot of philosophy at all.
These fellows are so smart, why arent they the Government!
acerb45666555 4 weeks ago
hey antisyncretism, consider yourself lucky that medieval/christian philosophy gets any of our precious time at all.
bishop berkeley, in so far as he was important/interesting, was not a christian philosopher either. descartes, kant, wittgenstein and many other philosophers were christians, but that does not make them christian philosophers. the term christian philosopher is a bit of an oxymoron anyways, no matter what aquinas says.
memoryburn7 8 months ago
Apparently medieval philosophers are so unimportant that they can all be summed under one head with no real concentration on any one of them.
I'm guessing its because so many of them were Christian (discounting Averroes, Maimonides etc) the only time any Christian philosopher got any real time on this show was Berkley...and that was split with John Locke, its so stupid that this show keeps opting for more 'secular' philosophers over everyone else.
Makes me think less of this show.
Antisyncretism 11 months ago
@Antisyncretism consider yourself lucky that medieval/christian philosophy gets any of our precious time at all.
bishop berkeley, in so far as he was important/interesting, was not a christian philosopher either. descartes, kant, wittgenstein and many other philosophers were christians, but that does not make them christian philosophers. the term christian philosopher is a bit of an oxymoron anyways, no matter what aquinas says.
memoryburn7 8 months ago
Comment removed
Antisyncretism 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@memoryburn7 no, I don't consider myself 'lucky' and the fact that you simply dismiss all of those philosophers such as Aquinas as ignorants betrays a naivety of the sophistication and importance of their thought. To say that Christian philosophy is an oxymoron is also very naive.
Antisyncretism 8 months ago
@memoryburn7 Nope. Descartes' philosophy was comitted to Christianity just as much Descartes was. Kant's categorical imperative is clearly derived from Jesus's 'Do unto others...', Wittgenstein, inasmuch as he refrains from preaching, clearly derives influence from Tolstoyan Christianity. Kierkegaard, Pascal... You can say what you want about the Christian church, but without them preserving and discussing it, we'd have had no Plato, no Aristotle and probably not a lot of philosophy at all.
leconfidant 6 months ago
i love how they are siting there at the end looking at eachother, it cracks me up
StephenBRICK 2 years ago 10
@StephenBRICK It really is very funny.
AtheistdotEDU 1 year ago
@StephenBRICK Being philosophers, they probably decided that it is the most practical way to talk.
morvensky 1 year ago
superb
philosophyteacher 2 years ago 6
Thanks for posting this
samuelejigu 2 years ago 3