Press conference after stepping down - 1

[tindesk862]

Wat hijack? Stupid chinese phrases

[singaporek9]

I must say that despite the high level of tension and stress, Josie Lau has conducted herself extremely well. Too bad the same can't be said of her other clueless team members. The "SHUT UP AND SIT DOWN" line directed at the long-contributing veteran members is just the clearest indication that they have no regard for the contributions of the Old Guards who have done much for us.

[suvarbal]

josie you are dull with a fake smile talking to feeble minded journalist

[CaLb3rY]

hi kindlyexplain

Unlike most gay activists, I prefer a neutral stance on homosexualism altogether.

Pushing it too hard, and we see something like US, with hate crimes and irrevocable social polarisation. But over here in Singapore, what was intended to be a live-and-let-live policy has now been violated by Dr Thio and Co. It deeply angers the part of our society that values HUMAN rights and religion-free polity.

Kindly 1ST answer the earlier post 1st before rebutting to this.

[kindlyexplain]

1,425 hellos, CaLb3rY.

Kindly explain. Since when is copulating anuses and ejaculating into shit to create human shit and new mutant Shit1N1 viruses religion-free and a HUMAN right?

[CaLb3rY]

Hi kindlyexplain,

In October 2007, Section 377 was repealed. Straight couples may now legally perform anal/oral sex.

So therefore, "rational or not" to allow humans to even perform this act that "create human shit and new mutant Shit1N1 viruses", non-"religion-free" and non-"human right"?

Kindly answer in accordance. And remember, we are talking about humans here. You can intro animals at the zoo if you're so keen.

[kindlyexplain]

1,429 hellos, CaLb3rY.

Simple, straight, narrow and rational; Only safe sex for humans is heterosexual non-anal and non-oral sex between two committed life partners.

[IN35335]

please read all post before being kepboard finger happy and start typing.

I don't have all the time in the world to waste debating with you. I'm wasting my precious sleep time to reply your silly arguements.

AWARE taught teenagers to use condoms

to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

If people wanted to do it from behind use a condom.

by using comdom you don't get shit on your organs.

[IN35335]

OH MY GOD!!!!!!

Kindly actually created another account to rebuttal me.

I hope she never finds out where I live. I'm beginning to feel threatened by her enthusiamism for this debate.

now she calls herself "truthandtruthonly".

than she removes what she posted.

I was wondering where that post went. The reply is still in my inbox.

[kindlyexplain]

Hello IN35335's "OH MY GOD".

Q1: Name the "GOD" in your "OH MY GOD".

Q2: Name the scripture the "GOD" in your "OH MY GOD" regards to be his authorised scripture.

Q3: The "GOD" in your "OH MY GOD" condemns or approves anal sex and homsexualism?

Very revealing that you should "feel threatened" by"truthandtruthonly" lady.

Q4: Truthful or untruthful persons are threatened by truth?

[CaLb3rY]

Hi kindlyexplain and IN35335,

To Q1, it's juz a phrase. Else, people from other cultures will have "Oh my Buddha", "Oh my Allah", etc, if you get my drift.

To Q2 and Q3, I do know of at least 1 religion that neither advocate nor dissuade homosexualism. Even within Christianity, there's no perfect unity on opinions, even though there's supposedly only 1 bible.

To IN35335, just ignore that msg. There are plenty of people in the world similar to kindlyexplain anyway.

[strawberrypanic81]

Are you by any chance Thio Li Ann in disguise? HORROR! HORROR!!!! WE'VE GOT A VIRUS IN OUR MIDST!!!!! RUNNNNN.....

[kindlyexplain]

Hello CaLb3rY.

Reasonable or unreasonable to expect AWARE's D-anaL-am, Constance Singam, Margaret Thomas & gang & cahoots in Straits Times and The New Paper, to also defend the right of "consenting partners" to, within their private domains, also have "safe-sex" with "consenting" animals (gorillas, orang utans, chimpanzees, pigs, goats, dogs, cats, rabbits, rats, etc) ?

[CaLb3rY]

To kindlyexplain

This has resulted in a waste of breath and time, talking to someone vulgar and self-centered. You can't ask animals for consent in the first place.

And if anal sex and blowjobs are gross, then why is it legal and clean to be done to the opposite sex? Maybe as long as it's the opposite sex, it doesn't matter if it's cats, rabbits or donkeys?

Kudos to you and your animal future wife/husband. I hope you have great time having straight sex together. =D

[kindlyexplain]

1,384 hellos CaLb3rY.

Why so many words of no answer to simple straight forward question?

REASONABLE or UNREASONABLE, to expect AWARE's D-anaL-am, Constance Singam, Margaret Thomas & gang & cahoots in Straits Times and The New Paper, to also defend the right of "consenting partners" to, within their private domains, also have "safe-sex" with "consenting" animals (gorillas, orang utans, chimpanzees, pigs, goats, dogs, cats, rabbits, rats, etc) ?

[CaLb3rY]

To kindlyexplain

Simply because you are just trolling.

It's as good as asking, if your parents are (collective of animals or derogatives) who gave birth to you, with the main aim of not to seek understanding, but to hurl verbal abuses like any ignorant people.

Strictly speaking, AWARE was referring to humans. You too, have yet to reply to any of my questions since beginning, neither seeking empathy nor knowledge.

But no thank you. I'll little chitchat will need to end prematurely. I'm tired.

[kindlyexplain]

1,385 sympathies, CaLb3rY.

You are tired?

Nitey nite.

[CaLb3rY]

You too. Sweet dreams to ya too~

[kindlyexplain]

1,389 G'd Days, CaLb3rY.

You had slept well?

You've heard the news?

"Home > Breaking News > Singapore > Story May 21, 2009 Changes to sex education programme MOE tightens vetting By Theresa Tan

SCHOOLS will no longer have the autonomy to hire external groups to teach sexuality education to their students."

Hip, Hip, Hurray !!!

Bye, bye AWARE of Dana Lams, Constance Singams, Margaret Thomases & etc.

[IN35335]

having gay sex and lesbian sex is different from doing it with animals

Please do not post irrelevant stuffs which are not constructive to your arguements.

Please write with reasons you are writing with anger because people are not agreeing with your views.

You might want to cool it and be more rational with your posts.

[kindlyexplain]

1,421 hellos, IN35335's "having gay sex and lesbian sex is different from doing it with animals."

Kindly explain just how sex with animals is objectionable or repulsive to gay sex proponents, and vice versa, when both groups are united:

- in denying and rejecting of there being any absolute right and wrong;

- worshipping their "trinity-god" of "god the orgasm, the pleasure & the feeling good"; and

- in championing of the Darwin-religion that humans evolve from animals.

[IN35335]

Another bad arguement. Animals are not human beings and there is no way of communicating with them.

I urge you to respect yourself and stop insulting the beliefs and rights of others in this free society that we live in.

You obviously do not understand the good work that the old guard is doing for the society. Its a waste of time debating the subject with you because obviously we live in two different time. You belong to the stone age.

[CaLb3rY]

Hi IN35335

I feel that there's no need to get so workup over kindlyexplain. Hurling verbal abuses (regardless of who started it) is a rather negative mean of educating each other.

As much as I can see of this issue, everyone just wants their own space, though it's juz that Josie and co. overstepped their boundary. And the reaction of certain fractions of the public being so agitated at the meeting is only to be anticipated.

[kindlyexplain]

1,435 hellos, IN35335's "You obviously do not understand the good work that the old guard is doing for the society."

Kindly explain very clearly what the D-anaL-ams, Constance Singams, Nadyas in AWARE were surreptitiously doing to school children regarding anal sex, pre-marital sex.

This is the time and the age to teach school children that pre-marital sex and anal sex are neutral?

Where, since when and from whom did you embrace this "neutral" teaching?

[CaLb3rY]

Hi kindlyexplain,

You could keep your eyes close on the issue of pre-martial sex, as long as it doesn't concern your kids. Sexual education is just teaching kids/teenagers safe sex, so that at least your kids who have been "naughty", doesn't at least come home with STDs and pregnancy. And there are already laws to ensure that only consenting adults above age 16 are allowed to have sex.

So what AWARE does have been perfectly legal, and does indeed render a service to our society.

[kindlyexplain]

1,438 !!!!!!!...!s, CaLb3rY !

D-anaL-am AWARE's specially trained trainers telling MOE school children that anal sex is neutral is "perfectly legal and does indeed render a service to our society" ??????!!!!!!! ?

Giving you one chance to explain fully, to gauge what you do truly deserve.

Waiting. Waiting.

[CaLb3rY]

Hi kindlyexplain,

Assuming what you said is EXACTLY stated by them, they are right to say that anal sex is perfectly legal, in heterosexual context. The old Section 377 that bans anal/oral sex has been repealed in October 2007.

As I remembered, they DID advise against casual sex. And in any event that one still wishes to engage in sex, to take safety precaution. Don't misinterpret it.

"You don't touch a hot kettle. If you do, wear mittens." It's not encouraging people to "touch the kettle".

[kindlyexplain]

1,448 hellos, CaLb3rY.

Care to detail every procedure, implement and material used to render anal sex of copulating anuses and ejaculating into (dry or moist or watery faeces filled) rectums safe for copulating and ejaculating into - for all to know just why anal sex made however safe, will always be unsafe, digusting, and a direct threat to civilisation?

[CaLb3rY]

Hi kindlyexplain,

I will kindly refuse to elaborate.

Unfortunately/fortunately, I've never perform it myself to enlighten you on the procedures of anal sex, and it's highly unlikely that I'm keen in it in the future. Nevertheless, it doesn't means I should impose my own preference on anyone who prefers anal sex.

By the way, the vagina and penis are where liquid waste are displaced from the body. Might that means it's cleaner? Sex is never "clean".

[kindlyexplain]

1,451 reliefs over your unfortune/fortunate, CaLb3rY.

Holy cow !!! Quite a virgin, you. Your idea of vagina penis intercourse being penis urinating into vagina !!!

???!!! Your idea of respect (as a person who, hopefully, does not drink intoxicating drinks before and, especially, while driving) is to not impose your preference on others who prefer to drink intoxicating drinks before and, preferably, while driving?

Anal sex and drink driving are not the same?

[CaLb3rY]

To kindlyexplain,

Pardon the late reply. Having a pretty good school holiday at the moment.

Wow! I never know sex involve pissing into whatever that the male genital is plug into. That was very educational indeed. I'm pretty certain though that anal sex doesn't involve the person being penetrated to try to shit. That's pretty turn-off, or at least by my definition.

And drink driving is a life hazard to everyone. It's a terrible analogy... a red herring actually to waste time.

[kindlyexplain]

IN35335.

Rational or not rational?

- Followers of Darwin-religion must also be defenders of the right for consenting apes (be they, gorillas, orang utans, baboons, chimps) and humans to have sex (be it, vagina sex or anal sex or both) with each other.

- AWARE's (anal-sex defenders) Dana Lams. Constance Singams, Margaret Thomases, Nadyas, Hafiza Osmans & etc are more likely to be followers and practitioners of Darwin-religion.

[CaLb3rY]

hi kindlyexplain

Hope you don't miss me too much. =D

I see great animalistic nature in your arguments. In the same light, my turn to kindly ask: Rational or not?

1. Sexual intercourse between opposite sex, between human and animals?

2. Conservatives argued that it is only natural for opposite genders to have sex and reproduce, thus they too also subscribe to Darwinian-religion?

Thank you kindly for your swift and wise answer, fellow simian.

[kindlyexplain]

1,425 apologies, CaLb3rY.

You are not missed, at all.

1. Totally irrational and criminal - any sexual intercourse between humans and animals.

2. Totally rational - sexual intercourse by humans of opposite sex within marriage.

3. Kindly explain. Why do you say that conservatives subscribe to Darwinian-religion (of evolution, which preaches that apes are elders/seniors to humans)?

[CaLb3rY]

Hi kindlyexplain

To part 1 and 2: Oh. I didn't think you realise we were talking about humans all the while, cos somehow you manage to link up human and apes/donkeys/cows/etc.

To the rest of the question, there's no necessity to answer anymore, cos you have deviated from the topic on Human Rights, not Animal Rights.

[IN35335]

to Kindly

You have posted so many irrevalent replies here that it is starting to feel replying to you is a waste of my time. I do not want to hurt your feelings by educating you on the process of anal sex because there may be kids reading these replies.

I only want you to know that if the hole belongs to that person who is willing to let it be penetrated it is the owner's business. You don't like it go sit and cry at the corner.

[kindlyexplain]

1,370 hellos, CaLb3rY

Youtube's "Homosexuality in Iran = Death By Hanging"

What do you think (Arabia and Iran-schooled) ulamas would do to your tudung-wearing homosexuality-supporting AWARE exco members?

[CaLb3rY]

to kindlyexplain

Every race have their own norms. But it doesn't mean the norms are right. Kindly explain why is it that the UN are now trying to pass resolution to stop violence and injustice of this form?

"Your idea of helping gays is to help gays to remain gay..."

- I don't think anyone could convince you to be gay, unless you are. The reverse is true to. Did you not read the Tearoom Trade I recommended?

[CaLb3rY]

to kindlyexplain

I hope you are not endorsing the stance of Iran.

If you wanna impinge your beliefs on others in a violent way, what different are you from Osama or Hitler? But of course... Everyone do whatever they can for the belief that it's the best for everyone. But acting upon ignorance and intolerance wouldn't get you anywhere.

[IN35335]

kindlyexplain

why can't you understand that gays and lesbians are also human beings who have their own way of thinking and they need support from others?

You should go live in the stone age.

[kindlyexplain]

1,339 hellos, Calb3rY's

""IF, by sheer coincidence, that the entire "ex-new" excos, aka Josie and co. are muslim wearing tudung, there is nuthin wrong with them being excos either.

The keypoint of debate here is the issue of inclusivity. Josie and co. said "Let's get back to the basic." It raises questions whether are they going to exclude extending help to women, who happens to women? What has been the mission of AWARE then? ""

Hi, CaLb3rY.

Kindly explain. TQ.

kindlyexplain

[CaLb3rY]

to kindlyexplain

Quote you: "Wud u and the Straits Times also press to oust that "new exco" , had all of its then "new exco" been tudung wearing members of a local muslim mosque with the ulama of their mosque preaching on Friday that homosexualism is a sin?"

[kindlyexplain]

Quoting your (not, my) post, CaLb3ry.

"Wud u and the Straits Times also press to oust that "new exco" , had all of its then "new exco" been tudung wearing members of a local muslim mosque with the ulama of their mosque preaching on Friday that homosexualism is a sin?"

You ask homophilic Straits Times.

Me? I think the ulamas may just lengthened the necks of those tudung wearers, before I could even lodge any protest.

[CaLb3rY]

to kindlyexplain

It's fine for any various groups to be represented as excos in any secular organisation, as long as it fits their constitution. But it is also important that they do not bring in their religious beliefs into practice.

AWARE aids to help women, regardless of their ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, etc. If the new excos are going to nitpick on the people they'll help, then AWARE would have failed its mission. Try asking Josie and co. why they bias towards homosexualism.

[kindlyexplain]

1,370 hellos, CaLb3rY.

Would you agree with me that the the office of Singapore's 1st PM is still without any employee who is known to him for copulating anuses and rectums or for advocating that such sex is "neutral"?

The 1st PM has brought his religious belief into practice? Which religion?

Your idea of helping gays is to help gays to remain gay and continue to copulate anuses and (dry hard, moist, watery) faeces-filled rectums ?

Josie and co bias towards homosexualism? When?

[CaLb3rY]

To kindly explain

"The 1st PM has brought his religious belief into practice? Which religion?"

- That's just Anglo period socially accepted norms, as old as ethical inequality, if not older.

- By the way under normal circumstances, there's little reason for any one in a government sector to admit their sexual orientation, simply because its "politically incorrect". Just look at how NMP Siew has been pressurized since he advocate a non-discriminatory stance towards homosexualism.

[kindlyexplain]

1,374 hellos, CaLb3rY

Your question: """IF, by sheer coincidence, that the entire "ex-new" excos, aka Josie and co. are muslim wearing tudung, there is nuthin wrong with them being excos either."

My question to you:

"'Youtube's "Homosexuality in Iran = Death By Hanging'

What do you think (Arabia and Iran-schooled) ulamas would do to your tudung-wearing homosexuality-supporting AWARE exco members? "

Your answer please.

[IN35335]

Josie did do her part for AWARE and she has proven it with her actions. She really is a marketing talent.

AWARE's membership grew from around 300 people to 3000 and everyone in town is talking about it don't you all agree that she didn't lie in that aspect?

[chenzlin]

Its good that Josie and her team steps down, otherwise they have to face few thousands of lesbians who suddenly became AWARE members out of nowhere!

[marcosviniciusandra1]

Dear AWARE Committee: It has been more than a week since I've posed these questions and there has been no reply. I'll post it again:

Do you tell your daughter that 'ANAL SEX CAN BE HEALTHY OR NEUTRAL IF PRACTISED WITH CONSENT AND WITH A CONDOM?".

Do you tell your son: "HOMOSEXUAL IS PERFECTLY NORMAL. IT IS THE WAY OF LIFE"?

If not, why do you tell that to my children?

Now you know why Thio SM is my hero? She fights for my children. Who do you fight for?

[IN35335]

If your child chooses to become homosexual, It must be somewhere in his growing up stages that made him want to go that way.

How long does your child stay and live with you before they get in touch with the people from aware? Is it right to blame someone who gives support and assurance to your child because of your mistakein bring up the poor child? If AWARE doesn't do that for you maybe your child will lose his direction in life and end up dead at the void deck of some hdb block.

[kindlyexplain]

IN35335.

If your child is sick (be it because of your actions, or because your child chooses to be sick), do you work to cure your child of that sickness - or do you molly coddle "with understanding and love" your sick child, to continue to be sick, "lest your child loses his direction in life and end up dead at the void deck of some hdb block"?

[IN35335]

It would be everyone parent's wish and hope to have and rise a normal child without any problems.

But if a problem starts to grow in them we will have to understand why they chose that path. We know that it may be wrong or socially incorrect but we cannot abandon them we have to think from their point of view.

[kindlyexplain]

1,423 !!!s, IN35335.

Your approach to "solving problems"?

If a problem starts to grow in a child (of say, wanting to have consenual vagina or anal sex with animals, or consensual same-sex sex with his or her human partner) parents should understand and support that child's point of view?

[IN35335]

You are a bad parent and I pity your child.

You don't understand human rights.

You are a communist who doesn't respect others' rights. You are a dictator.

You put words into others' mouth.

When did I support animal sex? When did anyone other than yourself suggest our children have sex with animals?

you don't think rationally and is blinded with your one sided thinking. Go see a shrink.

[kindlyexplain]

1,435 hellos, IN35335's "You put words into others' mouth. When did I support animal sex? When did anyone other than yourself suggest our children have sex with animals?"

Let's see who is guilty of "putting words into other's mouth".

Kindly cut and paste my complete lines which you allege I have regarded you to be supporting animal sex - and that I have suggested that our children should have sex with animals.

Waiting. Waiting.

[CaLb3rY]

Hi kindlyexplain,

Quote you:

"Reasonable or unreasonable to expect AWARE's D-anaL-am, Constance Singam, Margaret Thomas & gang & cahoots in Straits Times and The New Paper, to also defend the right of "consenting partners" to, within their private domains, also have "safe-sex" with "consenting" animals (gorillas, orang utans, chimpanzees, pigs, goats, dogs, cats, rabbits, rats, etc) ?"

Isn't that allegations that AWARE and we are pro-animal sex?

[kindlyexplain]

1,438 hellos, CaLb3rY.

kindlyexplain had consistently chewed up AWARE's D-anaL-am, Constance Singam, Margaret Thomas & gang & cahoots in Straits Times and The New Paper for which sex they were defending and surreptitiously promoting to school children?

- Penis-vagina sex between husband and wife; or

- D-anaL-am's anal sex between consenting partners?

Which sex, CaLb3rY ?

[IN35335]

To kindly,

You are not being rational at all somehow I feel that you are an extremist who loves to control and force your point of thinking on to other human beings.

We should open up our thinkings and learn to accept and respect the good that other people are doing. Stop your foolishness and go surf the internet you will learn more things.

[IN35335]

Please look back at your 1314 hello to me. In my post I did not mention anything about animal sex it was you who linked animal sex with lesbian and gay sex.

In my post to you I did not say anything about you supporting animal sex so I urge you not to be blinded by your own wild fantasies.

[kindlyexplain]

With 1,208 thanks to trailnuts in Wayangparty.

Google "Testimonies 2008 ....Church of Our Saviour (COOS)"

"... by Shawn Tay. My mum was an angry and hostile woman. When I was growing up, she used to beat and cane me often. Emotionally, I was very hurt by her. ..."

Interesting.

[mickeybond88]

Helping homosexuals and lesbians is NOT the same as helping people to be homosexuals and lesbians which is what the old guards are trying to do to our children.

So be aware.

[CaLb3rY]

And I don't like that fact that Josie actually used PAP as a backing force, not to mentioned being supported by NMP Dr. Thio, a relative. The government is supposed to be representative of Singapore's collective diversity, not a monarchy that imposed it's own beliefs to the people.

It's a shame. I feel that the issue about sexual orientation have been avoid for too long. The government should take a more neutral stance by encouraging diversity acceptance, as it was with religions and ethnicity.

[kindlyexplain]

CaLb3rY

It would be a shame or not a shame to Singapore, shud it ever elect/appoint supporters of the right to privately copulate rectums & faeces-stuffed colons & to breed new mutant virus - to sit on their rectums as judges in its law courts, as ministers in its cabinet, as teachers in its schools, as footballers in its S-League, as counsellors in its social services, as surgeons in its operating theatres, as members of its SAF, Police and SCDF, as swimming instructors & etc, etc?

[IN35335]

what people do behind closed doors is their business and it doesn't really concern you.

If you are not game enough to do it than don't do it. If others who are more open to new things want to try it can you realy put a lock on them to disallow them?

At least AWARE is teaching people how to do it safely rather than wrongly. Accept the fact that the world is changing.

[kindlyexplain]

1,269 hellos IN35335.

Doesn't really concern others? Kneading mucous, semen, blood and faeces with a penis or, more likely higher body temperature (behind close doors) wud not create new hog virus for transmission to public via blood banks, sex, & etc?

There a safe way to copulating faeces? How? Details, please? Condoms? Condoms don't tear? Every faces sex act is medically surpvised by a public health official. Sex-crazed animals can be trusted when they promise to use condom?

[IN35335]

Didn't AWARE teach and advise people that if they want to do it they should be using condoms?

[kindlyexplain]

1,314 hellos, IN35335.

Desperate for desperate sex can be counted on to use the C.O.R.R.E.C.T. condom - C.O.R.R.E.C.T.L.Y, without either slipping it out or tearing it?

Have you seen how desperate dogs on heat copulating desperate bitches on heat?

Slow and easy - or fast and furious?

Gays use condoms made of tear-resistant truck tyre rubber formulations with high tensile steel belting reinforcement?

[IN35335]

What must I say to get this into your thick skull?

a) you don't go around comparing people with dogs.

b) what others do is none of your business. We are living in a democratic world. if you don't like, don't see don't do and don't think about it.

But please do not force your thinking onto others cos everyone can think for themselves.

[CaLb3rY]

to kindlyexplain

And of course, when it so happens that the group of people who held the same belief and discriminatory view towards a minority group and pushes their view into secular space... Are you even sure this is the right course of action? That's why they were asked. Explicitly. Why don't they just create another group themselves? They want to push their beliefs. Sure. Why don't they do it without disrupting their competitiors?

[CaLb3rY]

to kindlyexplain

It seems you're pretty homophobic yourself. "Sex-crazed animals"? That's a sweeping statement. And besides, the heterosexual ain't that "holy" as well. What's with redlight districts, with rapes done by the straights?

And finally. I question you whether it does concern you. Does it matter if your neighbours are gay, and that they are making out at this moment you are reading this entry? You'll still carry on with your life, preaching your belief on web, work, eating KFC, etc.

[CaLb3rY]

to kindlyexplain

On a sidenote, kindly read up a sociological study years ago done by Laud Humphreys, titled The Tearoom Trade.

In short, it's about married men, some of whom even had kids, having sex with men in public toilet.

If people are going to be forced to be straight, this is what's going to happen. A complete desecration towards marriage, simply because society DEMANDS that married is only allowed between a man and a woman. It's what this society wants, isn't it?

[CaLb3rY]

Do note that Josie and Co. only represents a fraction of the collective Christianity, so they are not representative of the community. I'm not a Christian myself, nor do I like Christianity, but it's a diversity that we need to embrace.

And actually, the same applies to sexual orientation. What's wrong with AWARE helping lesbians? They are women too. Sexual orientation is irrelevant. And this represents AWARE. These women need help in the 1st place because society marginalized them.

[kindlyexplain]

CaLb3rdY

Wud u and the Straits Times also press to oust that "new exco" , had all of its then "new exco" been tudung wearing members of a local muslim mosque with the ulama of their mosque preaching on Friday that homosexualism is a sin?

Or, wud you and the Straits Times have praised and given such a tudung "new exco" time to get the exco to be more "diverse and representative"?

[Beginningless]

Josie and Co. are nowhere NEAR Poonsam's aura of power and force.

They attempted to play and mislead the meeting by toying on the several constitution articles. How wonderful to have the loyal, long-time volunteer Poonsam stepping in and 'reminding' them of the danger of NOT resigning. Hahaha...just priceless to see Josie and Co.'s faces twisted and distorted, yet trying very hard to maintain composure.

They must'd felt like "f*ck! This woman is damn strong & hard to beat!" Haha...awesome!

[obligatedliving]

Obviously the society doesnt disapprove strongly enough about this incident to come vote against.

*shrug* what to do?

[robinkwang]

Society disapprove homosexuals, the votes doesn't count in the mass public opinion

[chenzlin]

Ms Josie, its a blessing that you did not retain your position in AWARE, otherwise, you have problems dealing with lesbians in every meetings.

[Beginningless]

Chenzlin: don talk c@ck here. Blessing? Hahaha...Christians are such a fantastic lot. When they receive wonderful stuffs they say it's god's work. When they got defeated or fell, they said it's ALSO a blessing. WHEN do they ever find a time to REFLECT on their mistakes and LEARN from them? No they don't.

And thus we see them getting arrogant and hautier by the every min passed. Why? Because they never learn, but only come to justify with their self-absorbed glory and fantasties. How pathetic.

[jungfrauzara]

Finally in 1:38 to 1.45.. Proof from the horse's mouth of the conspiracy to hijack the exco!!! muahaha

[avatar05]

WHY is DBS still keeping her??? More DRAMA??? I guess Bad publicity is afterall publicity huh.

[AlisonL1]

She's got horrible speaking skills. She really needs to learn ow to speak in coherent sentences.

[marcosviniciusandra1]

Dear AWARE Committee: Do you tell your daughter that 'ANAL SEX CAN BE HEALTHY OR NEUTRAL IF PRACTISED WITH CONSENT AND WITH A CONDOM?".

Do you tell your son: "HOMOSEXUAL IS PERFECTLY NORMAL. IT IS THE WAY OF LIFE"?

If not, why do you tell that to my children?

Now you know why Thio SM is my hero? She fights for my children. Who do you fight for?

[belbuttons]

Jenica still not happy having to give up her power on the board. I'm sure you will be following closely to see if membership falls won't you so you can say "see i told you so". Please stop making unnecessary comments. Just keep quiet and move on. Yes more can be done but not with someone like you on the board.

[One1satu]

JL can bring new members and huge sales revenue for AWARE. Hope she can be the next DBS CEO...and brings more drama action to work...

[darennio]

Wow. It must take alot of power to stay that straight face.

[Wwwism]

Look at the speech patterns and their body language, nervous laughter..... they will fail every poligraph test. In other words, these women are liars.

[maverick020]

shut up n sit down!

[delandreas]

she is reading the speech off a script.

how cool.

[JoelJYYX]

I support Ms. Lau & her team. They stand for what's righteous. Her confident speaking skills & solid demeanour are highly admirable in the face of such overwhelming opposition & pressure.

[MummyMary]

Righteous? How so? Hijacking a well established group, sacking women, changing locks and deliberately excluded pioneers from attending meetings?

[marcosviniciusandra1]

The EGM is amazing. After looking at many of the women who came in support of the old guard, the one question that comes to my mind is: "Are they women?" Someone should have verified that before allowing them to vote. To me, the result of the vote is null and void

[marcosviniciusandra1]

Hi brainless, how do you know they are women? They strap their chest, hate skirts, short crop hair, some bald, rude, uncouth, loud, aggressive. Women?

[missbossy1]

I have to say these women went through 7 hours of hell that I would not wish on anyone. I'm suprised they are still so composed.

[UnSaintLike]

The lady to the left of Josie Lau and the lady to the right got that kind of face that makes you just wanna %^$*#(#^*%& them up

[arunkumar311]

LOL! Kinda agreed... But you know, we should never do that...

[rowie190282]

boycotting DBZ's Credit Cards : reason given - Josie Lau!

[daringd]

malu!!!!! go build ur own organization lar. anihow takeover. bleh.

[AnfieldKop77]

Hypocrite.

[StingRhea]

o.0

[zhendamaomao]

Why don't you hijack DBS CEO position?

[thoburn]

I thought she said that they have graciously stepped down. so, what is this now???

[benyuen]

Malu for DBX

[cornaveron]

ai yoh...so pai se..to cling on to power when you're obviously not wanted. Forgot the prefix "un" in front of the gracious. You guys have been anything but gracious. so shut up and go home. clap clap clap clap... Thank you thank you thank you...

[sirkling]

Stop with the using of "groups of people" DEFINE IT I DARE YOU TO... liars...

[sirkling]

Liar Liar Butts on FIRE! Now it's really back to it's original roots! Stay away, we don't need another hitler....

[s0t0ngjazz]

How can they "graciously step down" when the motion to remove them have been passed 15 minutes before they announce it?

[niquechua]

Wow!!! Graciously step down. Oh ok. Sure.

[armyboy24]

AWARE has never strayed away from the original roots, untill you took over it with a sudden overwhelming votes supporting you . In terms of marketing and publicity, you sure did a great job letting Singaporeans know about AWARE through the ugly actions and deceit you and your team have contributed.

[jemdude22]

Oh no, she is lying again!