I never compare things like this on some kind of meritocracy scale...why bother?The esthetics and values of these two composers who knew each other were different as night from day and both have something different but equally valuable to offer. Rachmaninoff was a disciple of Tchaikowsky and Prokofieff was a tonal terrorist and prophet of the machine age who like Schoenberg wanted to rewrite Diatonic harmony.He did so without 12 tone rows and utterly alienating 95% of the human race.
I never compare things like this on some kind of meritocracy scale...why bother?The esthetics and values of these two composers who knew each other were different as night from day and both have something different but equally valuable to offer. Rachmaninoff was a disciple of Tchaikowsky and Prokofieff was a tonal terrorist and prophet of the machine age who like Schoenberg wanted to rewrite Diatonic harmony and well...he did so without 12 tone rows and utterly alienating 95% of the human race
Prokofiev did write gorgeous tonal music but I think he was more experimental in his compositions than Rachmaninoff. I dunno but they both write great piano music...
@enriquem90 woops that's true. I don't think Prokofiev even wrote atonal music. I think I got thrown off cuz there was no key signature but there is one.
Hmmm. Ive been following a Gould thread for several weeks. Today I wind up here, and almost did not listen to this at all. I LOVE just about anything Glenn Gould played except for atonal slop (pardon my english). Atonal is just something I dont enjoy. This one clip though seems to flow a little better and connect somewhat. Not as dark as some other P-recordings. Dont know if its Gould's touch or Prkfivs music here. Overall Gould dug the atonal and I STILL dont get non-music music. .
@1Janny1 this isn't atonal music...it IS dissonant and plays with modes, etc, but there is plenty diatonic in it. the first and third movement end in B-flat major, the second movement is in E major...Prokofiev played with dissonance, but to call his music atonal means not hearing 60 percent of it. Picking nits, I know.
@1Janny1 I think it's simply Prokofiev's music. Personally, I prefer the atonal over the "pleasant-sounding". Also, simply because you don't enjoy the sound of it doesn't mean this is "non-music" music. Of course, if you mean that this stands in opposition to many of the things that were considered "musical" in his day, then yes, you are quite correct. But this is still music nontheless. By the way, your English is great =)
I have turned many people onto atonal (or whatever term you prefer) music by playing this. It is not too far out there in my opinion. But, wow, this Gould interpretation seems to accent all the right spots.
by far my favorite piano piece ever. i just wish i had the sheet music to it. i remember walking through the local music store looking for Fur Elise and passing this, which far surpasses Fur Elise and all Beethoven for that matter. I wish I had discovered this gem earlier. I will forever regret that day.
@sacramushmygoat Rachmaninov wasn't Russian, he's a Tatar. It makes a difference in understanding his music. Similar myths abound, e.g. Ravel was Basque not French, Mozart was Austrian not German for instance. Prokovief sounds like madness but he needs to be taken as seriously as Beethoven. Prokofiev is a universal composer capable of everything.
@jdbrown371 Rachmaninoff was of Russian nationality bearing half Tatar ethnicity. Ravel was of French nationality bearing half Basque ethnicity. Cultural (including musical) influence does not in itself define one's nationality. As well, stating that "Prokofiev was a universal composer capable of everything" is rather sweeping and arbitrary, although I'm sure there is an intention hidden somewhere in there.
@sacramushmygoat he doesn't even aim to that! Prokofiev is the constant surprise, the constant possibility and mostly, the incredible variety of ideas he has. are there many composers that like him, have wrote such different works as the classical symphony, peter and the wolf, the violin concerto g minor, the sonata nr 8, aleksandr nevsky... i think it's best not to put prokofiev and rachmaninov in the same bag for the sake of both
@sacramushmygoat Prokofiev falling short of Rachmaninov? I'm sorry but I believe it is the other way around; few people compare with the genius of Prokofiev.
@sacramushmygoat I think, on the contrary, sometimes Prokofiev surpasses Rachmaninoff. Rachmaninoff was definitely the master of late Romanticism, but there's emotions that are inaccessible to him because of his foundation in the romantic musical language that Prokofiev can pull off perfectly. Rachmaninoff could never have created a work containing the same emotions as Prokofiev's second concerto. But they're both more awesome than a robot dinosaur fighting a giant Gregory House.
Anyway, I think Rachmaninoff, Prokofiev, Richard Strauss and perhaps Hindemith and people opf his generation were the last genuine classical composers. I can appreciate a lot of what falls under the modern classical category intellectually...but it really isn't the same thing, and I wish people would stop pretending it is.
up with the repercussions of this academic fantasy as the basis of how we listen to western so called classical music...that's how we ended up with the ridiculously academic "classical music" of the later half of the 20th century and the 21st...it makes no sense to consider it in the same breath as Bach Mozart or Beethoven because it is more of an academic study of what we call classical music than a genuine expression of the deep humanity that produced the music we call "classical".
@hoiszhdfoifh22 well said...I think they are both great but different...I mean there is so much wonderful music that gets no attention because our general approach is to always look for "the greatest" or "the successful". It seems to me to be a weird situation where we can't really relate to the emotional(for lack of a better word) forces that create music so there is this overdeveloped academic pursuit that hypercategorizes music in a falsely historical context and we have ended
@sacramushmygoat Well said but there is no comparison. Rachmaninov was essentially 19th century romantic (think Mahler) and Sergei was riding the bandwagon of Stravinsky's 20th century modernism. But of course you already know that.
Makes sense... I didn't realize it was Gould who was performing until I read your comments and the tags. Indeed, Gould hums while he plays/practices. Thanks!
you can understand that's Gould also listening at 35'''. There's a bar with three triplets of semicquavers, which must last 6 quavers (3:2+3:2+3:2=6), but gould makes a sort of glissando and he cuts tre quavers off. And it does also on the CD! I've never understood why, but it's known that Gould was not very able to play this kind of music ;) better in Bach and Hindemith
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Oh for christs sake.
You know it's only Asians that are technically proficient in music and lack souls. Gould was Caucasian and could play the wonderful music of that other Caucasian Prokefiev.
Asians excel at Bach get your facts straight.
Gould the Caucasian is not limited to Bach! What nonsense.
Is your last name Wong? Hong? Dong? Long? Song? Tong?
@EMPERORMIKI - What a lot of unfounded stereotypes here. Have you heard Aymi Kobayashi playing Mozart? Music has no borders, and all human beings are much more alike than different.
I love sweet piano sonatas like Beethoveen's Moonlight or Pathetique, but Prokofiev is great--his music would be wonderful as background to an Alfred Hitchcock thriiler like "The Birds" or "Psycho". He has that spooky "Twilight Zone" flair about him. I love it.
By no means bad. I think it just does not have that Russian march drive to it (in the 1st theme). I thought the 2nd theme was very lamentatious, I liked it. I would recommend Alexander Korsantia's recording but I would not avoid this one.
whenever i listen to this piece, i can clearly see a man who's about to lose his santiy while his feelings constantly change between rage and despair.
This movement is the only thing Prokofiev wrote that I absolutely cannot enjoy no matter how many times I listen to it. The fast parts are great, but once it slows down, it just gets...bad. And I know there's going to be a mob of people screaming about how "genius" it is, and how Prokofiev can do no wrong, but, let's face it: even composers have bad days. Even Mozart and Beethoven wrote a couple things that are clearly inferior to the rest of their oeuvre.
maybe you just need to be all high up to enjoy this movement... lol, just kidding! I think it depends a lot the mood you listen this... maybe the correct mood you could have only a time in life... my piano teacher said that you only can hear one time any music, if you listen twice, then is diferent... well... I'm all high up i think I'm going to sleep listening all of this! yeaaA!!
Yes, it is very true that some composer's music is not as good as their other works, e.g. a not every other symphony of Beethoven's was as good as his heavenly ninth. However, I think that everybody has a different aesthetic, so what may sound like random unenjoyable notes to you could be incredibly beautiful to others . . . so its just that some people think it sounds genius and Godly, but this just doesn't appeal to your aesthetic.
Glenn Gould sings when he plays
1862Debussy 4 weeks ago
@1862Debussy lol u used headphones right?? i heard it too
joboy1992jesto 3 weeks ago
@joboy1992jesto Right! XD
1862Debussy 3 weeks ago
What a fantastic interpretation!! Thank you so much for uploading!
dialecticon 2 months ago
this movement is amazing. the 3rd movement in comparison to this is a tad disappointing but still enjoyable
slateflash 2 months ago
oh silly me. prokofiev did write it exactly half a bar missing just for that bar!! oh miracle lol
justmartha 3 months ago
I love this playing. But I'm quite sure he skipped time equivalent to half a bar at 0:34 . hehe
But strangely the effect sounds really good.
justmartha 3 months ago
Prokofiev is the creator of the "Mind blowing". In the good way.
ALPRAS91 4 months ago
great modern,still modrn music...!amazing composer....!!
konstantinidisgeorge 4 months ago
who played this ?
melindasys 4 months ago
@melindasys Glenn Gould.
F14Lolcat 4 months ago
I've always preferred Stravinsky to Sergei but only now do I appreciate his genius. He's incredible.!
MrAkihiros 4 months ago
If Prokofiev's sonatas 6-8 are the "war sonatas" then this movement is surely the "carpet bombing" stage ...
ernent 5 months ago
@ernent Actually this is the "Stalingrad" sonata...
F14Lolcat 5 months ago
hahah, this IS glenn gould, i can hear him singing veeeery faintly in the background!
BurntOut90 5 months ago
i cut my nails while listening to this song. and they came out all jagged and sharp :)
thisnamehas18letters 5 months ago
This is one of the very rare vidoes where Glenn Gould plays a piece from the Romantic period XO
TheBoshintang 6 months ago
prokofiev.... A genius that comes once in a millenia...
TheBoshintang 6 months ago
turn off your lights at 7:33 and listen in total darkness 0.o
slateflash 7 months ago
@RH98 - lol, I caught the E-flats staring at my crotch.
Gflapcamel 7 months ago 2
The section at 0:22 has the same rhythm as Teddy Bears Picnic and sounds a bit like it!
bombergal1 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this sounds fucking homosexual
ilovesoda 9 months ago
@ilovesoda This sonata sounds like it would engage in intercourse with music of the same gender... how does that even fucking work?! :O
RH98 8 months ago
I never compare things like this on some kind of meritocracy scale...why bother?The esthetics and values of these two composers who knew each other were different as night from day and both have something different but equally valuable to offer. Rachmaninoff was a disciple of Tchaikowsky and Prokofieff was a tonal terrorist and prophet of the machine age who like Schoenberg wanted to rewrite Diatonic harmony.He did so without 12 tone rows and utterly alienating 95% of the human race.
478493 9 months ago 4
I never compare things like this on some kind of meritocracy scale...why bother?The esthetics and values of these two composers who knew each other were different as night from day and both have something different but equally valuable to offer. Rachmaninoff was a disciple of Tchaikowsky and Prokofieff was a tonal terrorist and prophet of the machine age who like Schoenberg wanted to rewrite Diatonic harmony and well...he did so without 12 tone rows and utterly alienating 95% of the human race
478493 9 months ago
Prokofiev did write gorgeous tonal music but I think he was more experimental in his compositions than Rachmaninoff. I dunno but they both write great piano music...
allenglandlawns 10 months ago
I do like the way Gould hears this first mvmnt in this recording.
rezmogm 11 months ago
Now this is good atonal music
cedricrlongreen 1 year ago
@cedricrlongreen I think it isn't atonal but complex harmonics ;)
enriquem90 10 months ago
@enriquem90 woops that's true. I don't think Prokofiev even wrote atonal music. I think I got thrown off cuz there was no key signature but there is one.
cedricrlongreen 10 months ago
This piece isn't atonal... It just cant decide which tone it wants.
dredeye 1 year ago
Weird that this sonata has a key assigned to it, since it doesn't even start in B-flat, much less stay there for any real length of time.
Prokofiev is badass, though. Lives right on the cusp of of 19th-century Romanticism and free atonality, which is my favorite place.
wbuck 1 year ago
I could never quite get into Rachmaninoff. He was always too formal for me. But that's of course a personal opinion.
Nutterbutterz95 1 year ago
You don't know how much I love this. ♥_♥
junenostalgia 1 year ago 2
Hmmm. Ive been following a Gould thread for several weeks. Today I wind up here, and almost did not listen to this at all. I LOVE just about anything Glenn Gould played except for atonal slop (pardon my english). Atonal is just something I dont enjoy. This one clip though seems to flow a little better and connect somewhat. Not as dark as some other P-recordings. Dont know if its Gould's touch or Prkfivs music here. Overall Gould dug the atonal and I STILL dont get non-music music. .
1Janny1 1 year ago
@1Janny1 this isn't atonal music...it IS dissonant and plays with modes, etc, but there is plenty diatonic in it. the first and third movement end in B-flat major, the second movement is in E major...Prokofiev played with dissonance, but to call his music atonal means not hearing 60 percent of it. Picking nits, I know.
Sveccha93 1 year ago
@1Janny1 I think it's simply Prokofiev's music. Personally, I prefer the atonal over the "pleasant-sounding". Also, simply because you don't enjoy the sound of it doesn't mean this is "non-music" music. Of course, if you mean that this stands in opposition to many of the things that were considered "musical" in his day, then yes, you are quite correct. But this is still music nontheless. By the way, your English is great =)
Nutterbutterz95 1 year ago
Pure art in its rawest form:)
Rimskyfarby 1 year ago
If you listen closely at around 2:56 you can hear him humming. You can hear Glenn Gould humming throughout most of his preformances. :D
dredeye 1 year ago
@dredeye Thanks for pointing that out. It makes him seem even more awesome! Haha.
Nutterbutterz95 1 year ago
I have turned many people onto atonal (or whatever term you prefer) music by playing this. It is not too far out there in my opinion. But, wow, this Gould interpretation seems to accent all the right spots.
chaddyfromtheblock 1 year ago
by far my favorite piano piece ever. i just wish i had the sheet music to it. i remember walking through the local music store looking for Fur Elise and passing this, which far surpasses Fur Elise and all Beethoven for that matter. I wish I had discovered this gem earlier. I will forever regret that day.
daltoncpierce 1 year ago
I LOVE GLENN GOULD!!!!!
marisasw 1 year ago
I freakin' love Prokofiev! This sonata is so brilliant and really fun to play - after months of practice for hours a day of course!
adams82683 1 year ago
This kinda sounds like a warped version of Teddy Bear's picnic.
bombergal1 1 year ago 3
@bombergal1 Actually,it's more like "Nellie The Elephant" !
FreddieSausage 1 year ago
A masterpiece of musical black humour
matowana 1 year ago 2
Brilliant! Gould is my favourite pianist
whatever534231 1 year ago
After a second of listening you have to recognize his stupid playing, always too much bachian
newFranzFerencLiszt 1 year ago
After a second of listening you have to recognize his stupid playing, always too much bachian
newFranzFerencLiszt 1 year ago
okay, ive been trying to like this, but simply cant. i cant stand it
Kefienzel 1 year ago
i love it! but my hands are too small to cope
afertyus1000 1 year ago
sounds like spider crawling to you!
BNM321zxy 1 year ago
I love all Prokofiev's compositions
aizendarwin 2 years ago 5
I can't believe he hated Chopin & Liszt.
2009xellos 1 year ago
He did? :O
coaster1000 1 year ago
Gould and Prokofiev is a very good combination
Vesters1 2 years ago
Prokofiev is the master of the wild spinning madness that sends your mind crying after to hear the rest of the story.
But he always falls short of the classic chilling Russian style; nothing can compare to the haunting tones of Rachmaninov.
sacramushmygoat 2 years ago 18
yay russian music
danedaworld 2 years ago 2
@sacramushmygoat definitly with u on the rachmoninov comment
but i dont know, wat made my mind cry was sorajbi's opus clavicymbolism or however u spell it.
now THAT is spinnign madness. but prokofiev is still a master of precussive piano
bboymango 1 year ago
@sacramushmygoat Rachmaninov wasn't Russian, he's a Tatar. It makes a difference in understanding his music. Similar myths abound, e.g. Ravel was Basque not French, Mozart was Austrian not German for instance. Prokovief sounds like madness but he needs to be taken as seriously as Beethoven. Prokofiev is a universal composer capable of everything.
jdbrown371 1 year ago
@jdbrown371 Rachmaninoff was of Russian nationality bearing half Tatar ethnicity. Ravel was of French nationality bearing half Basque ethnicity. Cultural (including musical) influence does not in itself define one's nationality. As well, stating that "Prokofiev was a universal composer capable of everything" is rather sweeping and arbitrary, although I'm sure there is an intention hidden somewhere in there.
ajwiebe 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ajwiebe A simple "Fuck You" will do...
jdbrown371 1 year ago
@sacramushmygoat he doesn't even aim to that! Prokofiev is the constant surprise, the constant possibility and mostly, the incredible variety of ideas he has. are there many composers that like him, have wrote such different works as the classical symphony, peter and the wolf, the violin concerto g minor, the sonata nr 8, aleksandr nevsky... i think it's best not to put prokofiev and rachmaninov in the same bag for the sake of both
martimtavares 1 year ago
@sacramushmygoat totally agree ! Rach's no. 1 indeed in all time stories, period.
ScaryIndeed 1 year ago
@sacramushmygoat comparing apples to oranges does not make sense
ShukriKorkis 1 year ago 2
@sacramushmygoat what a stupid comment, really.
alonsoamadeus 1 year ago 3
@alonsoamadeus haha, yeah they're not even similar styles.
RenegadeExpressVideo 1 year ago
@sacramushmygoat Prokofiev falling short of Rachmaninov? I'm sorry but I believe it is the other way around; few people compare with the genius of Prokofiev.
aabaker22 1 year ago 4
@sacramushmygoat I think, on the contrary, sometimes Prokofiev surpasses Rachmaninoff. Rachmaninoff was definitely the master of late Romanticism, but there's emotions that are inaccessible to him because of his foundation in the romantic musical language that Prokofiev can pull off perfectly. Rachmaninoff could never have created a work containing the same emotions as Prokofiev's second concerto. But they're both more awesome than a robot dinosaur fighting a giant Gregory House.
hoiszhdfoifh22 11 months ago 10
Anyway, I think Rachmaninoff, Prokofiev, Richard Strauss and perhaps Hindemith and people opf his generation were the last genuine classical composers. I can appreciate a lot of what falls under the modern classical category intellectually...but it really isn't the same thing, and I wish people would stop pretending it is.
Cancrizans 3 months ago
up with the repercussions of this academic fantasy as the basis of how we listen to western so called classical music...that's how we ended up with the ridiculously academic "classical music" of the later half of the 20th century and the 21st...it makes no sense to consider it in the same breath as Bach Mozart or Beethoven because it is more of an academic study of what we call classical music than a genuine expression of the deep humanity that produced the music we call "classical".
Cancrizans 3 months ago
@hoiszhdfoifh22 well said...I think they are both great but different...I mean there is so much wonderful music that gets no attention because our general approach is to always look for "the greatest" or "the successful". It seems to me to be a weird situation where we can't really relate to the emotional(for lack of a better word) forces that create music so there is this overdeveloped academic pursuit that hypercategorizes music in a falsely historical context and we have ended
Cancrizans 3 months ago
@sacramushmygoat two totally different styles...
mightyafrowhitey 11 months ago
@sacramushmygoat They're too different to compare almost, I love them both but in different ways.
vincentizghra 8 months ago
@sacramushmygoat I don't know, my chaotic mind praises prokofiev before rachmaninoff.
vincentizghra 7 months ago 8
@sacramushmygoat Russians got diversity! They got this, they got Rachmaninov, they got romantic Tchaikovski. Diversity :D
ofakar 5 months ago
@sacramushmygoat Well said but there is no comparison. Rachmaninov was essentially 19th century romantic (think Mahler) and Sergei was riding the bandwagon of Stravinsky's 20th century modernism. But of course you already know that.
MrAkihiros 4 months ago
Genius!!
Zebeldarebel 2 years ago 3
if you listen closely, you can hear someone humming to the music around 6:53....
M.C. Miller
smiller42 2 years ago
it's Gould himself!
Rinhos 2 years ago
Makes sense... I didn't realize it was Gould who was performing until I read your comments and the tags. Indeed, Gould hums while he plays/practices. Thanks!
smiller42 2 years ago
you can understand that's Gould also listening at 35'''. There's a bar with three triplets of semicquavers, which must last 6 quavers (3:2+3:2+3:2=6), but gould makes a sort of glissando and he cuts tre quavers off. And it does also on the CD! I've never understood why, but it's known that Gould was not very able to play this kind of music ;) better in Bach and Hindemith
Rinhos 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh for christs sake.
You know it's only Asians that are technically proficient in music and lack souls. Gould was Caucasian and could play the wonderful music of that other Caucasian Prokefiev.
Asians excel at Bach get your facts straight.
Gould the Caucasian is not limited to Bach! What nonsense.
Is your last name Wong? Hong? Dong? Long? Song? Tong?
EMPERORMIKI 2 years ago
@EMPERORMIKI - What a lot of unfounded stereotypes here. Have you heard Aymi Kobayashi playing Mozart? Music has no borders, and all human beings are much more alike than different.
musicfanBRA 2 years ago
@EMPERORMIKI I hope you are being ironic. Have you heard Aymi Kobayashi playing Mozart?
musicfanBRA 2 years ago
If you think I was serious kill yourself.
EMPERORMIKI 2 years ago
That would be Glenn Gould.
perjus 2 years ago 2
imo the best recording of this sonata is Konrad Skolarski.
tuxdcat 2 years ago
beautiful.... :_(
BalmungBerserk 2 years ago
I love sweet piano sonatas like Beethoveen's Moonlight or Pathetique, but Prokofiev is great--his music would be wonderful as background to an Alfred Hitchcock thriiler like "The Birds" or "Psycho". He has that spooky "Twilight Zone" flair about him. I love it.
124bjw 2 years ago
This is not a Russian march. It's a malignant tarantella.
LAAR123 2 years ago 3
By no means bad. I think it just does not have that Russian march drive to it (in the 1st theme). I thought the 2nd theme was very lamentatious, I liked it. I would recommend Alexander Korsantia's recording but I would not avoid this one.
morvensky 2 years ago
I repeatedly hear my heart trembling when hearing this piece, especially the middel part. It's as successful as the third movement.
visualpiano 2 years ago 2
individual interp, but it doesnt fly crazily as it should, i htink. But who am i to critisize GG?
skryabyn 2 years ago 2
Wow this sounds like a freaky dance!! Then it sounds like a mysterious night and someone sneaking about...
NapSeason 2 years ago 3
whenever i listen to this piece, i can clearly see a man who's about to lose his santiy while his feelings constantly change between rage and despair.
Werwolf2x 2 years ago 3
sometimes, i reli dunno wts prokofiev was thinkin.
his music is so difficult to understand.
AllegroDemolish 2 years ago
This sonata is fantastic, all.
This first movement is so beautiful
FabioThePianist 2 years ago 22
This movement is the only thing Prokofiev wrote that I absolutely cannot enjoy no matter how many times I listen to it. The fast parts are great, but once it slows down, it just gets...bad. And I know there's going to be a mob of people screaming about how "genius" it is, and how Prokofiev can do no wrong, but, let's face it: even composers have bad days. Even Mozart and Beethoven wrote a couple things that are clearly inferior to the rest of their oeuvre.
CocoaRadix 2 years ago
That's surpising. I find the slow parts especially moving.
harisiadis 2 years ago
Mozart sucks
darthphonebook 2 years ago
maybe you just need to be all high up to enjoy this movement... lol, just kidding! I think it depends a lot the mood you listen this... maybe the correct mood you could have only a time in life... my piano teacher said that you only can hear one time any music, if you listen twice, then is diferent... well... I'm all high up i think I'm going to sleep listening all of this! yeaaA!!
BalmungBerserk 2 years ago
Yes, it is very true that some composer's music is not as good as their other works, e.g. a not every other symphony of Beethoven's was as good as his heavenly ninth. However, I think that everybody has a different aesthetic, so what may sound like random unenjoyable notes to you could be incredibly beautiful to others . . . so its just that some people think it sounds genius and Godly, but this just doesn't appeal to your aesthetic.
KyndalSarah 2 years ago 4
Why worry?... if you don't like it then you don't like it, move on to something else.
NapSeason 2 years ago
@CocoaRadix world is strange.. slow parts of this first movement are the best for me, in the whole piano repertoire.. and I like Mozart of course..
bachopinberg 1 year ago
a very sad one...
Lukecash12 3 years ago
this is amazingly great
LackingLack0 3 years ago 6
Thank you very much. Listening with the score like this is a valuable addition to youtube!
-----------------------------
Rolf, Netherlands.
I am a collector of classical 78's and lp's
Click "otterhouse" above to see (and hear!)
some of my collection.
(Gioconda de Vito, Berl Senofsky, Vlado Perlemuter,
Carl Schuricht, Gina Bachauer etc)
otterhouse 3 years ago
Yep his third movement is better than most others I've heard.
boxplayer1973 3 years ago 2
love it
classicalpianist32 3 years ago 3
lol
markopianist 3 years ago
cool
viennajazz 3 years ago 2
I agree with Fallansig.....the 3rd mov't is top drawer, right up there near Horowitz.
shubus 3 years ago 3
oh then it's a pity that recording isnt posted on youtube. i'm having trouble finding it u see.
ryanyee1234567890 3 years ago
i doubt he played the last movement
ryanyee1234567890 3 years ago
he did
znanto 3 years ago
He did, and he did a excellent job at it too. It ranks as one of the best recordings of it.
Fallansig 3 years ago 6
can you put the 3rd movement of rhis piece in youtube please??
Ihi92 3 years ago