Added: 10 months ago
From: UnivPennsylvania
Views: 12,207
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I don't know what you mean by faulty conditions, but I will go in detail over AIM about what EXACTLY I'm talking about if you'd like.

  • I can't tell you how many idiots I've met who say they learned everything growing up, "from the movies." It shows how far we've fallen in this country.

  • @AntiquityCentury21 I don't see you logic there. Surely for the sake of saying they must have said that they learned everything from the movies ... insofar as movies inspire and motivate like books did and still do, I don't know how that is representative of how low are country spirals downward.

  • @AntiquityCentury21 It is a new medium by which people perceive emotion and information - a very specialized one at that given that usually the former is proportionally more predominant than the latter, and therefore has its set of pros and cons different from that of other mediums such as books. Now if you're trying to contend that real-life experience should be the source of learning, I say to you sure it should: but as a supplementary source of perspective, movie is no less inspiring ...

  • @dkwonism

    I would add that movies have great influence on the general public, the general public being an unintelligent entity. Movies influenced by Spielberg ie movies he's directed or produced, tend to have in them concepts (more specifically themes) that inspire thought and action..

  • @dkwonism They give to people a conception of reality, that is, an understanding of reality. An understanding of reality that is given could not be progressed for the foundation of which is unknown to the person.

  • Taking for granted therefore an understanding of reality the general public cannot think for itself and movies having such an influence on the general public ought to be pursued by philosophers so that their shaping (that is movies shaping) of human thought/action is one that is better controlled and one that would suit mankind rather than the individual or whoever (again assuming movies influence thought, and that this influence is intentional, and that this influence benefits a one or a few)

  • @iROFLatYouSOxD Sorry but you may have to qualify your statement. "An understanding of reality that is given could not be progress for the foundation of which is unknown to the person?" Well if I hadn't mistaken your meaning of words, I think that your assumption is that at least some movie-aspirers do not retain a foundation upon which reality should be built. What a dreadfully weak argument; you are merely underlining the faulty conditions of particular movie-goers.

  • This was a great speech, but she almost stole my man Denzel's material. I'm glad he's quick at improvising by thinking fast on his feet!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more