Added: 7 months ago
From: America21st
Views: 904
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Problem, 10 people getting all the wealth, soloution capitalism, problem socialism... Fuck sakes everywhere you go you see propaganda aimed at destroying peoples Ideas of socialism with disinformation. socialism is not communism. Nazis, italian facsits, hell everyone hated communists... Communists want one govt that represents no one peoples, under this smaller populations will be marginalised (most likely genocided) like in africa and china. Europe is most diverse continent for reason! No comie

  • I gave up because of the irritating background tones pretending to be musak.

  • lol

  • Excellent points. Through Medicare and Medicaid regulations, the government runs healthcare. The only way to decrease creeping fascism/socialism is to reduce the need for government regulations and entitlement control by reducing the need for government to be involved in our lives at all. Democratized ownership of capital could return our independence; but I can't stress enough, non-voting shares are the absolute center of this idea. Government facilitates ownership, does NOT exercise control.

  • I'm sorry, I normally do not comment on youtube videos but this one peaked my interest. So you are advocating Fascism, the government management of private property in order to prevent Socialism, the government distribution of the production or communism the government ownership of the means of production. Do you not see that it is the State that is the problem? I wish there was more room to comment here. You mean well but need to check your premises.

  • Thanks Brother Devious. I had to cut out money supply. Only had 14 minutes. I'm finishing a book that goes into money supply. Means of production = ownership vs command economy. If everyone owns but doesn't use government to command (non voting shares), correcting ownership concentration avoids the pitfalls of socialism...it only spreads the benefits. I'm not for stopping technological advance. It can't be done. But I'll check out lump of labour. Thank You!

  • No mention of the effect our money supply has on the business cycle, or the fact that we have so many machines doing the work of people BECAUSE the government has made hiring workers uneconomic.

  • The video argues against socialism.. and then wants the government to redistribute the means of production.

  • Do yourself a favor - check out the 'lump of labour' fallacy to see why why we won't all get richer by banning the wheel - which, in essence is what this video is arguing for.

  • some very excellent ideas!

    

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more