@kingg213-No idiot. I didn't get my information from fox, and the fact that you believe that I did makes look like an even bigger idiot. This guy in uses different materials, and different metals, just so he can lie to us and increase his chances of not looking stupid.
Good job on the video. It pretty much covers a lot of questions I have not heard answered truthfully yet. One more thing I'd ad, there is a lone photo I have seen several times in various presentations. Its a beam at ground level still in its footing that has obviously been cut by some sort of charge. Its a surgical very clean cut with about a 45 deg or more angle. Not a cut made for removal of debris during the clean up / cover up!
11:52 It's 2012 already and not one of the towers have been finished. We should have done better with rising from the ashes. It took a long time, even after cleaning up the catastrophe, before we even got started. And the blame has been put on developers, politics, and unions. We can do better than that.
In the history of man kind, three steel framed structures all collapsed due to the same reason, all owned by the same person, all at the same place, all in the same day, all nearly at free fall speed defying newton's laws of physics. What the fucking thing it could be my dear friends............
@zakquack- What do you mean by "NIST is in direct conflict with Newton?". Whenever I ask conspiracy theorist what they mean by this, they never seem to give me a straight answer. In reality, you conspiracy theorists are ones who believe everything your told. CTs just take everything at face value and are way too lazy to do any real research.
@dalek14mc Just the way you use the term 'CT' shows what a propaganda victim you are. There are no sides in a quest for truth. what we need are satisfactory explanations and these are not possible barring explosives bc of the overwhelming amount of evidence showing additional energy sources were present. This evidence comes from a broad range of facts and they all point to and corroborate the same hypothesis: explosive demolition.
This looks like gravity to you? watch?v=hSApOavkHg8
@winston2015-Typical response from a conspiracy nut.
"evidence showing additional energy sources were present."
No, there isn't. Conspiracy theorists constantly change of information and screw with the evidence to make you believe that the whole thing is a conspiracy, and your assumption that "propaganda" (which, by the way, doesn't exist when it comes to 9/11) has screwed with my head is fallacious, and is typical when conspiracy theorists desperately try to convince you.
@dalek14mc Well, why don't you show us your research then we can all be as enlightened as you seem to think you are! BTW, its obvious that your research comes directly from FOX News lies and other MSM. No go back and listen to Rush Limbaugh so he can give you your opinion! ASSHOLE!
l've seen top down demolitions where one wall was pulled and all the lower floors pancaked exactly like the WTC all without explosives. l guess they were an inside job too.
@zmc33 Crazy until you look into it and see that any steel framed structure has very real structural integrity risks in fire compared to steel reinforced concrete structures like the Empire State building or Pentagon. The Empire State Building is rated one of the safest skyscrapers in New York.
@zmc33 Please that pulled story is so weak. We all know pulled was refering to pulling the firemen out, besides it would have been pointess telling the firemen to "PULL" the building since the are not trained in building demolition
@Spindry96 all the firemen were evacuated from wtc7 at around 12 noon. larry was not talking to or about firemen when he made that statement. even Controlled Demolition, the company that cleaned up wtc, and OKC, said that 'to pull' means to implode buildings. slang if you will...plus all the insider short sales. plus cia flight schools in florida where atta trained. stand down orders...on and on. google barry seal. this is all about drugs guns and money.
Amazing vids, thanks. Is there an explanation for the office fires in building 7? if there was a fire/fires, why did it break out in the first place? it makes no sense. Im with the demolition theory
@grandmastershek I've been following this channel for a long time and to this day i haven't seen anyone muster a solid argument against any of these experiments.
So why don't you make some Youtube videos and prove these experiments wrong. Stop yapping and start debunking. Let us know when they're ready. :-)
@grandmastershek that's a complete misrepresentation... did you even watch the videos? There are no strawmen (do you even know what that means?) and it's filling in the full truth to the 1/2 truths represented on the television! Use the scientific process to argue these videos... not...whatever you're doing...
@zakquack Yes I have & do know what it means. You do know that the scientific method involved submitting your research for evaluation? Not hiding on youtube/using fake journals.
1/2 truth 1: "Some of the hijackers are beleved ot be still alive"
Well that's of course if you ignore the follow up reports
1/2 truth 2:"no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11"
I guess that means no evidence of Al Qaeda, right? Nope. Yah know Al Qaeda, run by Bin Laden.
Excellent resource. I have not seen among debunkers try to refute these truths scientifically. They rather go with some of the more shoddy conspiracy theories like in the PM article/book. If it's not true then prove it, simple as that.
@pauladamkim I think my favorite part of this video is when he claims that Bin Laden was accused a year before any official investigation began. Well except for the FBI's investigation PENTTBOM, which began on 9/11.
Burning aircraft fuel doesn't melt steel, nor does it turn concrete to dust! You Tube; ' Plane Hits Empire State Building '. Wake up and smell the coffee! Killing Osama Bin Ladin, was just tying up loose ends. Everyone that took part in that raid is now dead, because their helicopter was shot down!
Never forget JFK, Never forget RFK, never forget MLK, never forget the S and L scandal, Never forget Iran Contra and how Bill Casey Died, or Mr Kelly in england, or Olaf Palme in Sweden, or Admiral Forestall, or Bill Cooper, or Phil Schneider,
The depleted uranium rounds killing our own troops and deforming unborn babies in Iraq. Never forget America is creator of weapons to the world including nuclear weapons to China, and Russia. Never forget slavery or native American genocide.
@zakquack They are constantly ignored! When talking truth on forums, I love to bring up the thermite video, people blatantly ignore it! They will address most issues, but when you show them REAL evidence, they don't even try, they just act like you never even posted it.
@JoeyStockton the best argument against the scientific and logical evidence presented on this channel I've heard is "that Steven Jackson guy makes piles of money doing his seminars." I dont know who that guy is or even if i got his name right... Truth is, in 01 i had just read Isaac asimov's 3 volume introduction to physics.. So with the laws of physics fresh in my mind, i could not buy into the shit we were being spoonfed... I haven't done nearly enough research to be confident
@DINGLEtheBERRY dont forget, the pancake effect is a theory with its only evidence being a house of cards (literally, a house built from a deck of cards is where this theory comes from)
Great vid, but I believe an even more exotic means of demolition was used, as there was hardly anything but dust left after the event.
Both in the thermite scenario and in the NIST fairytale you would expect a large pile of rubble present at the site, instead we see them almost disintegrate completely into fine dust.
This has never happened in the history of construction.
Examine the photographs of the rescue workers and notice how the pile of dust from 110 stories is only about 4-5 meters high.
@disinpho My suspicions have been for a long time that apart from Thermite, high explosives were also used. Thermite to cut the steel-beams, the high explosives packed into the maintenance levels. Conventional, not "exotic", because it's simpler and easier.
history cannot be permanently falsified; the myth cannot stand up to the scrutiny of research; the sinister web will be brought into the light and torn to pieces, however artfully it has been spun
I've always felt the United States' response to the devastating events of September 11th should have been peaceful and reflective of our humanity. I created a video and posted it on my channel to honor those who lost their lives that morning and in the wars that followed. Peace is possible, but it has to start somewhere.
@flanksteak2 That problem of resistance is even more damning in the case of WTC 7. Symmetrical collapses like that (90% into it's footprint) really do only occur with controlled demolitions for a reason; they're impossible otherwise. Any claim denying this is utter garbage - but that's normal from governments too, corrupt bureacrats, politicians, crooks of all kinds. Yet, there are fools emotionally attached to their authority figures pronouncements, despite the authority being caught lying.
@flanksteak2 That's NIST ignoring reality - to simulate a collapse for an investigation requires continuing the simulation until complete. Not just saying "Hey that's enough guys, let's go home and have a beer". The math shows there wasn't enough gravitational energy for the collapse to continue. Whoever wrote the NIST reports, decided policy, was a crook. Corruption is so common in government, so no surprise. We see biases applied to fulfil policy objectives often; like the Dodgy Dossier.
@Orgasmosexicon How dumb do you have to be to require a "simulation" of what is clearly visible in the videos and what can be easily calculated using simple addition and subtraction?
You have to be Truther dumb.
If you think that collapse should have been arrested then you are stupid. The building below does not even come remotely close to being able to arrest the collapsing the mass.
@flanksteak2 What's clearly visible in the videos is controlled demolition. Math and physics support this. Your denial of physics in order to make a liar's claim proves 2 things; 1) You maybe incredibly ignorant; 2) You may know the truth but prefer to blatantly lie instead about what's obvious.
Personally, I think you're just being really stupid. But you're entitled to that. Go ahead, throw insults, I reply in kind - the argument devolves into that. You get no where, and lose the debate anyway.
@flanksteak2 Now, some more facts. In any REAL investigation of those collapses, a proper and FULL simulation of the collapses would be required to understand them, NIST avoided this, because every time they tried, the collapses ARRESTED - LOL - that's provable by MATH. Deny it all you like, physics is NOT going to change to fit some stupid political bullshit or corrupt lobby group's lies.
@flanksteak2 Of course the real reason why those collapses weren't arrested is because they had to be controlled demolitions. 3 buildings, in one day. I dare you to cite any other steel-framed skyscrapers going down in less than a minute without controlled demolition. If physics is on your side, you'll find them - but you won't - because only controlled demolitions could result in those buildings going down like that. You want to accuse me of being "truther-dumb"? LOL - you're just a troll.
@Orgasmosexicon You believe that the collapses should have been arrested but you believe without evidence making your assertion nothing than pure fantasy.
Imagine that? You're a grown man engaged in make-believe.
@flanksteak2 Hmm, now you're trying to pretend to have telepathy. Fail. Try to stick to critical points, and back them with something REAL please. Can you do that, or are you going to persist in troll behaviour? Please cite an example of a steel-framed skyscraper collapsing in less than a minute straight down on any day other than 9/11 without being CD, please. Go ahead, try..... I'm waiting.
@flanksteak2 You're claiming the impossible yet again. Steel-frame skyscrapers NEVER collapse straight down from assymetrical damage, the source of the damage plane or penguin or bomb makes no difference at all. It's the fact of it being on ONE SIDE only that means it can't go straight-down! Man, are you stupid or what??? Then there's WTC 7 - no plane anyway. You're starting to tie yourself in knots with your stupid excuses.
@flanksteak2 Actually, I have - including links on occasion. You ignored the aerial photo showing that WTC 7 went down nearly entirely within it's own footprint. You ignore the witnesses too. Your "imagination" is deluding you a little too much.
@Bernadotte01 Frank Greening - the chemist? Not a physicist, not an engineer? You know his formula were crap too, because he knew so little physics. He's an idiot, in other words.
The destruction of the WTC, along with the deaths of thousands, being premeditated by the US gov't is impossible, therefore, your video evidence can be eliminated.
They have done it before, ever heard of Pearl Harbor? False flag events are part of the things that the government can do to get what they want. Do some research on previous false flag events that have been declassified by the government, you will be shocked to know how many of our own people they have killed this way.
@omarm1984 Sorry that lame claim doesn't logically hold-up because FACTS and Science beat stupid opinions like yours E V E R Y T I M E. Physics shows it's impossible to have such collapses without controlled demolitions - therefore they could only be controlled demolitions. Don't like it, complain to the Universe, it doesn't care - physics isn't going to change to fit your disregard of it.
@flanksteak2 Resistance for a start. It increases the more material that has to be gone through, reducing the energy remaining to continue the collapse. Basically, you can't get 1/3rd to crush 2/3rd of a building designed to support 6 times it's own mass. Not enough gravitational energy. The collapse stalls. NIST was unable to fully simulate collapse, only the "start" - but scientifically, that's not good enough. They never did explain simultaneous failure of all supports either. Fail again.
don't waste your time with cowards like LHOooooser,he's a fucking disinfo agent that gets money to stay here on YT covering the truth,there r a lot of morons like him with several accounts,they works for the real terrorists,they r the worst shit in this world.Here u can see cowards american terrorists from usarmy killing disarmed people as a joke (from 14:30):
watch?v=R-gitG32P_U
terrorists in caverns,democracy,peace mission FUCK OFF LIARS
@bernuga That's almost what bothers me most sometimes. I'm really good at spotting them usually though. They follow a particular pattern, usually trying to drag people into a personal argument etc. There's a coulp eof other lazy techniques they have that are so formulaic. You've got to remember that they've been told that 911 conspiracy is unpatriotic and could lead in itself to terrorist type thinking. Kind of ironic.
@gasto5 "the truth has nothing to fear from investigation"
Investigation has already been done on the collapse of the towers by NIST. FBI ran the criminal investigation 10 years ago, the criminal responsible was killed a few months ago......
I don't think anyone fears a new investigation, it's just too redundant at this point to take serious, don't you think?
@stig781 you are right, we are #1 in north America. As for the world, we used to be #1 according to the Human Development Index (HDI), although other countries have been rated higher since...but Canada is still just inches from #1. where is the U.S. at?!
don't waste your time with cowards like LHOooooser,he's a fucking disinfo agent that gets money to stay here on YT covering the truth,there r a lot of morons like him with several accounts,they works for the real terrorists,they r the worst shit in this world.
@bernuga don't waste your time with morons like bernuga he's a fucking disinfo agent that gets money to stay here on YT spewing bullshit, there r a lot of morons like him with several accounts,they works for the truth movement, they r the worst shit in this world. Answer the question moron
if WTC 7 was a controlled demo then what type was it, the industry standard name.
Question 2 how was this type rigged? Prove your not a bullshiter
@TheLHOser Your comment starts and finishes with juvenile BS. The middle is not much better, with no source. There ARE men who claim their identities were stolen by the 9/11 hijackers. Is identity theft a figment of twoofer faggots' imagination?
@Skeptic121 ok so I was laughing. Best thing really as this video claims these men are alive this is source bbc only. And guess what its wrong as BBC corrected this! Ok question for you and any truther here if WTC 7 was a controlled demo then what type was it, the industry standard name.
Question 2 how was this type rigged?
Prove truthers have any weight in there arguments.
@TheLHOser Best hypothesis: thermate inside the hollow box columns was used to weaken WTC7 because it makes hardly any noise compared to explosives. Once WTC7 was weakened, just a few small conventional cutter charges would have been enough to bring it down. For details, I would subpoena the construction workers on the CNN video who said "keep your eye on that building it'll be coming down" and "building's gonna blow up". Who were they; who did they work for; what were they doing in WTC7?
@Skeptic121 NO I was looking for the industry name for this type of controlled demo that is clearly visible in many videos. its called an implosion. but due to the way wtc n7 is constructed this is very difficult to achieve. We also have david chandler proving this type wrong by pointing out some free fall acceleration that does not work in implosions.
As much as people don't believe that fire collapsed the building internally it is the only way for the free fall acceleration to happen.
@TheLHOser NOTE : The Control demolition used in the WTC was NOT a conventional Control demolition
that is why so many people desagree and are wasting time ...the Pros and Cons are both wrong (and right in a way) CONVENTIONAL CONTROL DEMOLITION WAS NOT USE .
SEARCH THE FOLLOWING (Google Wikipedia) : * "Where did the towers go by Judy Woods" (also in video) * SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munitions)
@reykool "Where did the towers go by Judy Woods" (also in video) * SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munitions) * MADM ( Medium Atomic Demolition Munitions)"
First judy woods Please re read all here stuff then speak to an expert its all miss leading.
Atomic Demolition so they used tis for WTC 1,2 but not 7 as this type of demo dose not create collapses as seen in wtc 7.
Maybe you should think of a theory that makes sense like NIST report. Its an inside job because someone told you wow fool!
@TheLHOser U don't know but nicely try,SADM, MADM is WTC 1 & 2 ONLY I never said 7, I spent hours speaking with Richard Gage in NY last year and Judy Woods as well, I was there the following day (9/12) there was 1 inch of powder covering everything PLANE & FIRE DON'T REDUCE TOWERS WTC 1&2 INTO POWDER. The NIST report is for fools, my business partner was on the 10th Floor & escaped I also spoke to guys working in WTC 1 basement, major sub basement explosion occurred BEFORE the 1st plane hit
@TheLHOser SO AS A DEBUNKER GIVE US YOUR THEORY ! OR "PROOF" Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three Presidents Steve R Pieczenik declared that he is prepared to tell a Federal Grand Jury the name of the top General who told him directly 9/11 was a False Flag attack (inside Job) This is very well documented and his interview can be easy found (search Google or others)
Steve Pieczenik works as consultant for the Department of Defense (Harvard Medical School & PhD at MIT)
@reykool you've fallen into the LHOser's trap... None of Physicsandreason's videos are debatable, that's why people will always try to pull the argument away from the content of this video... you're debating atomic demolition because that's an argument he can manage.
@zakquack I did not fall in any trap , ONLY THOSE WHO BELIEVE THE OFFICIAL VERSION DID , don't waste time on HOW because the bottom line is WHO DID Only Intelligence agency insiders and private military contractors know HOW it was DONE many died anyway. I know from the people I talked to (former Intel analysts Pilots and engineers) That 9/11 was a False Flag attack I mentioned different Control demolition Technologies which are unknown from the general public who think only 1 way
@TheLHOser ANY idiot watching and timing how long it took for the three building to collapse straight on their own foot print would realize it took about NINE seconds from top to bottom Free fall would be 8 seconds so ONLY additional force had to be involved, how ever not all three Building 1 2 and 7 were pulled with the same type of control demolition, 9/11 was a False Flag attack SEARCH (Google) : TOP GOVERNMENT INSIDER : BIN LADEN DIED IN 2001, 9/11 FALSE FLAG ATTACK by Paul J Watson
@reykool 9 second wow where did this figure come from did you pluck it from your ass or miss read NIST report?
The NIST report is for fools LOL Your thick
Its been 10 years and know ones been able to refute it no expert on earth and as for Richard Gage he is also not qualified to comment on this as proven many times by real experts.
You have your head in the clouds buddy come back to earth your being lied to with all this bullshit.
well... ive watched alot of vids on the subject.. seen alot of shit and this is Not shit. america the most corrupt nation in the world.. *sigh* we will all see one day soon the truth about what matters.. people are blinded by the government.. they let themselves be blinded.. have a fucking mind of your own!!!! they are steering this country towards disaster everyday and noone sees the inevitability of it. the next war we participate in will be the one that fucks everyone..
Some debunkers are confusing SULFIDE and SULFITE. They sound alike but are completely different oxidation states of sulfur. Sulfur dioxide, SO2, reacts with water to form sulfurous acid, which reacts with base to form SULFITE anion. Neither sulfur dioxide nor sulfite will react with iron to form IRON SULFIDE, which Prof. Barnett found on the beam taken from WTC7 debris.
@ThePatriotMuckraker Why would anyone believe the planes brought them down? If I recall correctly the building stood for another hour each before collapsing.
"your some kid in high school who thinks he understands physics because he can watch some youtube video."
And you believe the physics that comes for the "idiot box" because some nist fraudster "gummerment" whore or paid presstitute tells you. Btw, the whole "buahaha" is passe & retarded. Seriously, can you dumb-fucks at the dod come up with better comebacks for the trillions of dollars the tax slaves pay for your welfare check? Maybe? I don't think so.
@ThePatriotMuckraker LOL I'm sure you don't even pay taxes kid your mommy and daddy does, witch I'm sure they get there welfare checks LOL every 9/11 myth has been debunked for the countless times. Maybe you should research it.
Nice try welfare queen. Nothing has been debunked, only in you criminal syphilitic mind do you take what your daddy "gummerment" tells you and claim it as proof. Gooodby.
@ThePatriotMuckraker LOL I'm a very happy middle class person, and it seems like all you can do is get your facts from youtube videos, maybe if you read a book or did some real research you would know your beliefs are all bullshit anyone can find any information on the internet that proves there beliefs. Guess what if i wanna believe in Aliens i can find a website with "proof" LOL same with bigfoot and nessy and 9/11 lawl
I'm sorry government welfare recipient, I don't have time to feed your psychosis. I'm off to beat the shit out of your fellow dis-info agents protecting the banks at the wall street protests. Have a nice day.
@TheAlexJonesCult even if you disagree with the results of these experiments, you've got to respect the method. Whatever you say is meaningless unless you can back it up within the scientific method. Nothing in this video has been debunked. If you don't understand how NIST is in direct conflict with Newton, you are ignorant to physical laws and need not comment on anything regarding actual science. You'd obviously rather be spoonfed bullshit than work for a meal...
@zakquack Why hasn;t he submitted any of these studies to a legitimate peer reviewed journal? You know, the part of the scientific method where you submit your results for scrutiny? Oh right truthers do that on youtube. Only the best and brightest here.
@grandmastershek Very rude... I'd put more effort into writing you back but you're not going to take me seriously... I'd like to point out that Al Qaeda did not exist until post-9/11. What is your motive here? it's obviously not to promote free-thinking.. It's obviously not to promote exchange of ideas... If you don't support those two things, you are an enemy of the truth unfortunately... If you're able to post a polite counter-argument for this video's contents, I am willing to read it.
@grandmastershek youre the pot calling the kettle black now.. You ask me to speculate at the motives or reasoning of another and when i ignore such a ridiculous request, you say im running from scrutiny? Ok fine youve goaded me into it.. Perhaps he thought it best to open his studies to the public to scrutinize while refining his formal documents? Perhaps he does not have as much faith in the legitimacy of the others as you do? Perhaps he thinks legitimate scientists can review things here?
Watch this video. Now add more details such as: WTC 1&2 were designed & built with steel beams that are progressively thicker towards ground level, and foundation. The whole magic pancake theory and crushing collapse is pure quackery.
What annoys me the most is that most people didn't even believe me when I said the towers fell too fast, it's understandable however, I was in pre-school. Having a dad that's a physics teacher puts some pressure on you. But that my teacher wouldn't take my explanation is quite frustrating. My parents did however, and they probably noticed it themselves too, but they didn't want to say anything.
Who the fuck doesn't know what a dick is by then? And as I said, physics teacher dad. Puts pressure on you. Of cause not everyone knows newtons laws by that age, but if you have gone through school you should, and a majority of people have gone through school. This is basic stuff.
Cmon, I'm not arrogant. It's silly that people didn't react on this, all around the globe, I guess the "investigation" is what kept people quiet, expecting pro's to do shit. No.
@SnoweyMan111 kid your like a junior in high school in another country...how can you be so critical when your on the outside and at an impressionable age? 7 years old in preschool....tht just hurts your post ahah yes you are arrogant, "But that my teacher wouldn't take my explanation is quite frustrating", dude you were fucking 7years you couldnt have formed an opinion tht deep you were just brainwashed by ur parents..understanding newtons laws is as easy as a bible story
@SnoweyMan111 and for you to think its as simple as to understand newtons law to explain 9/11 then you and ur parents are delusional and child protective services should be called in (if your country even has that) and also name one scientist tht has been fired or been kept quiet haha and why is your dad a physics teacher? ill tell you why...he probably barely got by with a 2.0 gpa from a bs university and cant get a real job cause through you it shows hes probably a terrible physist
@tnable182 No actually he's great. And I get the feeling you're trolling. And that you're getting F's in all your English classes because this shit is hard to read. I'm putting in effort here, I shouldn't speaking to mentally challenged people isn't all that rewarding actually.
@SnoweyMan111 yea its the fucking internet sorry mr. spell check and no its because ur dad could get a real job with his 2.0 and has brainwashed his little comrad
@tnable182 You make alot of assumptions. Physics is just about the only thing we really agree on. Since it's logical.
How about you go out and get a real sensible view on the world instead of making stupid assumptions out of no info.
I don't see how a single human being can find it worthwhile to speak to you. But clearly, internet anonymity can give the biggest and stupiest cowards spine to puke ignorant shit.
@SnoweyMan111 you still havent offered any explanations other than speculation..i dont have to proven anything you do....your the one how as the burden of proof on this argument
@tnable182 You have yet to ask about anything. Period. Ask for something and I will supply an answer, as long as the answer isn't just repeating what's been said in the video.
@SnoweyMan111 wht is your proof it was an inside job...and saying how a building falls or wht happened with the "explosions" is all speculation and theory...make theory, law
@tnable182 So you're doubting physics? I never said it was an inside job, but it's highly unlikely that terrorists got into WTC with US (no other countries really use that stuff since it's rather new and developed in the US) explosives and detonated it like that. They tend to only want to send a message. However, the goverment needed to make people angry, and if the buildings didn't fall you could probably see people be alot less hurt.
And the video provides alot of info to answer the physics.
@tnable182 Hard proof of that the towers fell? Who did it? That it was good for the US goverment?
One of those I can't answer, I can't answer who did it in cold hard proof. But you can't expect say a murderer to put his name on a note and leave it at the victims house. So what you should do is to think a little bit. It's much more likely that the goverment made this scheme and destroyed the WTC, rather than them being attacked and then attacking the wrong nations, twice.
@SnoweyMan111 i dont mind you having you theories but to speak with such confidence and to try to justify yourself by calling everyone else stupid proves nothing for you and conspiracy theorist come off as assholes
"..incendiaries, explosives, and controlled demolition.."
After many years of doubt, anger, and being led astray, we are finally waking up from this horrible dream. Trust your fellow man, who has nothing to gain other than reassurance he's not the only one who has a mind of his own. I will never trust the government again. This was no doubt an inside job, but even the truthers believe it was merely a strategy to start wars overseas for oil. I believe the rabbit hole goes way deeper than that!!!!
There's little doubt that the US gov used the 9 11 attacks to their advantage, seizing control of an area of political and economic importance! THIS is the REAL CRIME!
However, conspiracy theories that they did the attacks themselves just distract from the real crime. I have no idea whether incriminating reports like sniff dogs being removed are true. But I do have a physics degree, and in my opinion there is no scientific evidence that they brought the buildings down.
@boajlp where'd you get that degree from? lol..i'm not trying to mess with you but if you haven't already, you should really watch all the videos on this channel. There IS definitive physical proof.
'physicsandreason' is the only channel that has legitimate experiments
@kingg213-No idiot. I didn't get my information from fox, and the fact that you believe that I did makes look like an even bigger idiot. This guy in uses different materials, and different metals, just so he can lie to us and increase his chances of not looking stupid.
dalek14mc 1 week ago
Good job on the video. It pretty much covers a lot of questions I have not heard answered truthfully yet. One more thing I'd ad, there is a lone photo I have seen several times in various presentations. Its a beam at ground level still in its footing that has obviously been cut by some sort of charge. Its a surgical very clean cut with about a 45 deg or more angle. Not a cut made for removal of debris during the clean up / cover up!
kingg213 1 week ago
11:52 It's 2012 already and not one of the towers have been finished. We should have done better with rising from the ashes. It took a long time, even after cleaning up the catastrophe, before we even got started. And the blame has been put on developers, politics, and unions. We can do better than that.
ecoRfan 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
lucatonicampioni 2 weeks ago
Wow another kickass video :) Dude your channel is like a gift that keeps on giving :) Keep up the great work :)
CokeSupply 3 weeks ago
The evidence in this video eliminates the pseudo-science in the other reports, commissions and mass media cover ups.
secretsundaze 4 weeks ago
great video, i have watched many 911 video's and this one is one of the best, great upload
ANDREWOFPR2 1 month ago
Watch Dimitri khalezov 911 documentary
davidpatrickson 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - 9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Full-length, Pre-Release-v1.3; Low-Res.
/watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ
9/11 - Missing Links ( full movie )
/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4
Why The Military Knows Israel Did 9/11
/watch?v=kVKGRB3cygg
Sockpuppet2012 2 months ago in playlist Jonathan Cole
In the history of man kind, three steel framed structures all collapsed due to the same reason, all owned by the same person, all at the same place, all in the same day, all nearly at free fall speed defying newton's laws of physics. What the fucking thing it could be my dear friends............
It is not other than a controlled demolition.
jasminhotel 2 months ago in playlist More videos from physicsandreason
This has been flagged as spam show
Israel did 911
TakeOurWorldBack (dot) com
YouTube video: 911 Missing Links
And the Truth will set the World free!
Sockpuppet2012 2 months ago in playlist Jonathan Cole
@zakquack- What do you mean by "NIST is in direct conflict with Newton?". Whenever I ask conspiracy theorist what they mean by this, they never seem to give me a straight answer. In reality, you conspiracy theorists are ones who believe everything your told. CTs just take everything at face value and are way too lazy to do any real research.
dalek14mc 2 months ago
@dalek14mc Just the way you use the term 'CT' shows what a propaganda victim you are. There are no sides in a quest for truth. what we need are satisfactory explanations and these are not possible barring explosives bc of the overwhelming amount of evidence showing additional energy sources were present. This evidence comes from a broad range of facts and they all point to and corroborate the same hypothesis: explosive demolition.
This looks like gravity to you? watch?v=hSApOavkHg8
winston2015 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@winston2015-Typical response from a conspiracy nut.
"evidence showing additional energy sources were present."
No, there isn't. Conspiracy theorists constantly change of information and screw with the evidence to make you believe that the whole thing is a conspiracy, and your assumption that "propaganda" (which, by the way, doesn't exist when it comes to 9/11) has screwed with my head is fallacious, and is typical when conspiracy theorists desperately try to convince you.
dalek14mc 1 month ago
@dalek14mc Well, why don't you show us your research then we can all be as enlightened as you seem to think you are! BTW, its obvious that your research comes directly from FOX News lies and other MSM. No go back and listen to Rush Limbaugh so he can give you your opinion! ASSHOLE!
kingg213 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Israel did 911
TakeOurWorldBack (dot) com
YouTube video: 911 Missing Links
And the Truth will set the World free!
Sockpuppet2012 2 months ago in playlist Jonathan Cole
l've seen top down demolitions where one wall was pulled and all the lower floors pancaked exactly like the WTC all without explosives. l guess they were an inside job too.
Spindry96 2 months ago
Comment removed
zmc33 2 months ago
@Spindry96
any links to video?
zmc33 2 months ago
@zmc33 Sure, do a You Tube search for "Top-Down building collapse 2"
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96
cool thanks. crazy this happened 3 times in one day!
zmc33 2 months ago
@zmc33 Crazy until you look into it and see that any steel framed structure has very real structural integrity risks in fire compared to steel reinforced concrete structures like the Empire State building or Pentagon. The Empire State Building is rated one of the safest skyscrapers in New York.
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96
this idea still does not explain building 7 falling in on itself. the owner also stated that they had 'pulled' the building
zmc33 2 months ago
@zmc33 Please that pulled story is so weak. We all know pulled was refering to pulling the firemen out, besides it would have been pointess telling the firemen to "PULL" the building since the are not trained in building demolition
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 all the firemen were evacuated from wtc7 at around 12 noon. larry was not talking to or about firemen when he made that statement. even Controlled Demolition, the company that cleaned up wtc, and OKC, said that 'to pull' means to implode buildings. slang if you will...plus all the insider short sales. plus cia flight schools in florida where atta trained. stand down orders...on and on. google barry seal. this is all about drugs guns and money.
zmc33 2 months ago
@Spindry96 10:12 am wtc#7 was totally evacuated...9ttuFqHB57o
zmc33 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Israel did 911
TakeOurWorldBack (dot) com
YouTube video: 911 Missing Links
Sockpuppet2012 2 months ago in playlist Jonathan Cole
Amazing vids, thanks. Is there an explanation for the office fires in building 7? if there was a fire/fires, why did it break out in the first place? it makes no sense. Im with the demolition theory
greatorderofchaos 3 months ago
ELEMENTARY MY DEAR WATSON!
jsnamberson 3 months ago in playlist More videos from physicsandreason
Comment removed
Kill0Your0TV 4 months ago
" In addition to iron spheres"
Liar, they found iron-rich spheres. Iron rich =/= iron.
Steven Jones's nanothermite research is laughable on multiple levels.
1. The sizes of the particles were on the macro level, not nano.
2. Their particles yielded inconsistent energy release results.
3. Their samples did not match their reference material.
This video proves nothing other than a fool regurgitating BS and peddling half truths and outright lies.
grandmastershek 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@grandmastershek I've been following this channel for a long time and to this day i haven't seen anyone muster a solid argument against any of these experiments.
So why don't you make some Youtube videos and prove these experiments wrong. Stop yapping and start debunking. Let us know when they're ready. :-)
Kill0Your0TV 4 months ago
@tripeboi Wow..."we're smarter" is such a fantastic argument.
grandmastershek 4 months ago
@zakquack Considering his arguments are based on strawmen and 1/2 truths there realy isn;t much of an argument necessary.
grandmastershek 4 months ago
@grandmastershek that's a complete misrepresentation... did you even watch the videos? There are no strawmen (do you even know what that means?) and it's filling in the full truth to the 1/2 truths represented on the television! Use the scientific process to argue these videos... not...whatever you're doing...
zakquack 4 months ago
@zakquack Yes I have & do know what it means. You do know that the scientific method involved submitting your research for evaluation? Not hiding on youtube/using fake journals.
1/2 truth 1: "Some of the hijackers are beleved ot be still alive"
Well that's of course if you ignore the follow up reports
1/2 truth 2:"no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11"
I guess that means no evidence of Al Qaeda, right? Nope. Yah know Al Qaeda, run by Bin Laden.
More?
grandmastershek 4 months ago
Excellent resource. I have not seen among debunkers try to refute these truths scientifically. They rather go with some of the more shoddy conspiracy theories like in the PM article/book. If it's not true then prove it, simple as that.
pauladamkim 4 months ago
@pauladamkim I think my favorite part of this video is when he claims that Bin Laden was accused a year before any official investigation began. Well except for the FBI's investigation PENTTBOM, which began on 9/11.
grandmastershek 4 months ago
Bill Mannings doesn't believe in the loony theories of the so called "9/11 truth movement"
TengoInfo 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Burning aircraft fuel doesn't melt steel, nor does it turn concrete to dust! You Tube; ' Plane Hits Empire State Building '. Wake up and smell the coffee! Killing Osama Bin Ladin, was just tying up loose ends. Everyone that took part in that raid is now dead, because their helicopter was shot down!
Bugstomper2 5 months ago
Never forget JFK, Never forget RFK, never forget MLK, never forget the S and L scandal, Never forget Iran Contra and how Bill Casey Died, or Mr Kelly in england, or Olaf Palme in Sweden, or Admiral Forestall, or Bill Cooper, or Phil Schneider,
The depleted uranium rounds killing our own troops and deforming unborn babies in Iraq. Never forget America is creator of weapons to the world including nuclear weapons to China, and Russia. Never forget slavery or native American genocide.
kellythesinger 5 months ago
@zakquack They are constantly ignored! When talking truth on forums, I love to bring up the thermite video, people blatantly ignore it! They will address most issues, but when you show them REAL evidence, they don't even try, they just act like you never even posted it.
JoeyStockton 5 months ago
@JoeyStockton the best argument against the scientific and logical evidence presented on this channel I've heard is "that Steven Jackson guy makes piles of money doing his seminars." I dont know who that guy is or even if i got his name right... Truth is, in 01 i had just read Isaac asimov's 3 volume introduction to physics.. So with the laws of physics fresh in my mind, i could not buy into the shit we were being spoonfed... I haven't done nearly enough research to be confident
zakquack 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we should always mention not only a steel core, an outer steel reinforcement. eliminateing any chance of pancaking.
DINGLEtheBERRY 5 months ago 13
@DINGLEtheBERRY dont forget, the pancake effect is a theory with its only evidence being a house of cards (literally, a house built from a deck of cards is where this theory comes from)
zakquack 5 months ago
@zakquack ya. were they the toughest ever built?
DINGLEtheBERRY 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
truth is stranger than fiction.
nayanmalig 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
megamogx 5 months ago in playlist More videos from physicsandreason
Spire turned to DUST !! A+ EXCELLENT VIDEO BY A EXPERT!! Science,physics ,facts,proof,beats the n.i.s.t Theory 150%
Headshothorror4488 5 months ago
Great vid, but I believe an even more exotic means of demolition was used, as there was hardly anything but dust left after the event.
Both in the thermite scenario and in the NIST fairytale you would expect a large pile of rubble present at the site, instead we see them almost disintegrate completely into fine dust.
This has never happened in the history of construction.
Examine the photographs of the rescue workers and notice how the pile of dust from 110 stories is only about 4-5 meters high.
disinpho 5 months ago
@disinpho My suspicions have been for a long time that apart from Thermite, high explosives were also used. Thermite to cut the steel-beams, the high explosives packed into the maintenance levels. Conventional, not "exotic", because it's simpler and easier.
Orgasmosexicon 5 months ago
I'm astonished that anyone could think dropping a cinder block on top of another stack of cinder blocks is a remotely accurate comparison.
InvernessMoon 5 months ago
history cannot be permanently falsified; the myth cannot stand up to the scrutiny of research; the sinister web will be brought into the light and torn to pieces, however artfully it has been spun
Dr Jakob Ruchti – 1915
becij13 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've always felt the United States' response to the devastating events of September 11th should have been peaceful and reflective of our humanity. I created a video and posted it on my channel to honor those who lost their lives that morning and in the wars that followed. Peace is possible, but it has to start somewhere.
marcpedraza 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
/watch?v=dVutUGDiQN0
megamogx 5 months ago
@flanksteak2 That problem of resistance is even more damning in the case of WTC 7. Symmetrical collapses like that (90% into it's footprint) really do only occur with controlled demolitions for a reason; they're impossible otherwise. Any claim denying this is utter garbage - but that's normal from governments too, corrupt bureacrats, politicians, crooks of all kinds. Yet, there are fools emotionally attached to their authority figures pronouncements, despite the authority being caught lying.
Orgasmosexicon 6 months ago
@flanksteak2 That's NIST ignoring reality - to simulate a collapse for an investigation requires continuing the simulation until complete. Not just saying "Hey that's enough guys, let's go home and have a beer". The math shows there wasn't enough gravitational energy for the collapse to continue. Whoever wrote the NIST reports, decided policy, was a crook. Corruption is so common in government, so no surprise. We see biases applied to fulfil policy objectives often; like the Dodgy Dossier.
Orgasmosexicon 6 months ago
@Orgasmosexicon How dumb do you have to be to require a "simulation" of what is clearly visible in the videos and what can be easily calculated using simple addition and subtraction?
You have to be Truther dumb.
If you think that collapse should have been arrested then you are stupid. The building below does not even come remotely close to being able to arrest the collapsing the mass.
Not even in the ballpark...or universe or galaxy.
Dumbass.
flanksteak2 6 months ago
@flanksteak2 What's clearly visible in the videos is controlled demolition. Math and physics support this. Your denial of physics in order to make a liar's claim proves 2 things; 1) You maybe incredibly ignorant; 2) You may know the truth but prefer to blatantly lie instead about what's obvious.
Personally, I think you're just being really stupid. But you're entitled to that. Go ahead, throw insults, I reply in kind - the argument devolves into that. You get no where, and lose the debate anyway.
Orgasmosexicon 6 months ago
@flanksteak2 Now, some more facts. In any REAL investigation of those collapses, a proper and FULL simulation of the collapses would be required to understand them, NIST avoided this, because every time they tried, the collapses ARRESTED - LOL - that's provable by MATH. Deny it all you like, physics is NOT going to change to fit some stupid political bullshit or corrupt lobby group's lies.
Orgasmosexicon 6 months ago
@flanksteak2 Of course the real reason why those collapses weren't arrested is because they had to be controlled demolitions. 3 buildings, in one day. I dare you to cite any other steel-framed skyscrapers going down in less than a minute without controlled demolition. If physics is on your side, you'll find them - but you won't - because only controlled demolitions could result in those buildings going down like that. You want to accuse me of being "truther-dumb"? LOL - you're just a troll.
Orgasmosexicon 6 months ago
@Orgasmosexicon You believe that the collapses should have been arrested but you believe without evidence making your assertion nothing than pure fantasy.
Imagine that? You're a grown man engaged in make-believe.
flanksteak2 5 months ago
@flanksteak2 Hmm, now you're trying to pretend to have telepathy. Fail. Try to stick to critical points, and back them with something REAL please. Can you do that, or are you going to persist in troll behaviour? Please cite an example of a steel-framed skyscraper collapsing in less than a minute straight down on any day other than 9/11 without being CD, please. Go ahead, try..... I'm waiting.
Orgasmosexicon 5 months ago
@Orgasmosexicon Please cite any other example of a skyscraper being struck dead on by Jet Airliner.
flanksteak2 5 months ago
@flanksteak2 WTC 7 was not hit by a plane. FAIL - Bzzzt! Try again, idiot.
Orgasmosexicon 5 months ago
@Orgasmosexicon Were there two other buildings hit by planes?
What role did they play in the 3rd building coming down?
flanksteak2 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flanksteak2 You're claiming the impossible yet again. Steel-frame skyscrapers NEVER collapse straight down from assymetrical damage, the source of the damage plane or penguin or bomb makes no difference at all. It's the fact of it being on ONE SIDE only that means it can't go straight-down! Man, are you stupid or what??? Then there's WTC 7 - no plane anyway. You're starting to tie yourself in knots with your stupid excuses.
Orgasmosexicon 5 months ago
@Orgasmosexicon FYI, you're not presenting any evidence for your case.
Imagine that. You have no evidence to support your fantasy. Probbaly the reason it's mere fantasy.
flanksteak2 5 months ago
@flanksteak2 Actually, I have - including links on occasion. You ignored the aerial photo showing that WTC 7 went down nearly entirely within it's own footprint. You ignore the witnesses too. Your "imagination" is deluding you a little too much.
Orgasmosexicon 5 months ago
@Orgasmosexicon Uh oh, you changed the subject without presenting any evidence for your first claim.
How sad.
A grown man engaged in make-believe who is so stupid that he must explain the world around him with conspiracy theories.
flanksteak2 5 months ago
@Bernadotte01 Frank Greening - the chemist? Not a physicist, not an engineer? You know his formula were crap too, because he knew so little physics. He's an idiot, in other words.
Orgasmosexicon 6 months ago
Same as the "freedom" of Libya except its a British thing to get at oil that Ghaddfi was charging more than we wanted to pay for.
Aren't our governments wonderful.
skeletorphd 6 months ago
Bravo. Great video
RUsqueelin 6 months ago
The destruction of the WTC, along with the deaths of thousands, being premeditated by the US gov't is impossible, therefore, your video evidence can be eliminated.
omarm1984 6 months ago
@omarm1984
They have done it before, ever heard of Pearl Harbor? False flag events are part of the things that the government can do to get what they want. Do some research on previous false flag events that have been declassified by the government, you will be shocked to know how many of our own people they have killed this way.
budusca 6 months ago
@omarm1984 Sorry that lame claim doesn't logically hold-up because FACTS and Science beat stupid opinions like yours E V E R Y T I M E. Physics shows it's impossible to have such collapses without controlled demolitions - therefore they could only be controlled demolitions. Don't like it, complain to the Universe, it doesn't care - physics isn't going to change to fit your disregard of it.
Orgasmosexicon 6 months ago
@Orgasmosexicon How does "physics" show that such a collapse is impossible?
flanksteak2 6 months ago
@flanksteak2 Resistance for a start. It increases the more material that has to be gone through, reducing the energy remaining to continue the collapse. Basically, you can't get 1/3rd to crush 2/3rd of a building designed to support 6 times it's own mass. Not enough gravitational energy. The collapse stalls. NIST was unable to fully simulate collapse, only the "start" - but scientifically, that's not good enough. They never did explain simultaneous failure of all supports either. Fail again.
Orgasmosexicon 6 months ago
Inside job and yet people still sleep, the USA has become the laughing stock of the thinking world.
MrDarkTides 7 months ago
don't waste your time with cowards like LHOooooser,he's a fucking disinfo agent that gets money to stay here on YT covering the truth,there r a lot of morons like him with several accounts,they works for the real terrorists,they r the worst shit in this world.Here u can see cowards american terrorists from usarmy killing disarmed people as a joke (from 14:30):
watch?v=R-gitG32P_U
terrorists in caverns,democracy,peace mission FUCK OFF LIARS
bernuga 7 months ago
@bernuga That's almost what bothers me most sometimes. I'm really good at spotting them usually though. They follow a particular pattern, usually trying to drag people into a personal argument etc. There's a coulp eof other lazy techniques they have that are so formulaic. You've got to remember that they've been told that 911 conspiracy is unpatriotic and could lead in itself to terrorist type thinking. Kind of ironic.
BiteTheBigOne2342 5 months ago
I guess it's easier for non-US citizens to appreciate videos that expose the truth since our sanity depends less on believing the lies.
martijnlafeber 7 months ago
9/11 was a controlled demolition of DEMOCRACY ITSELF. Remember the Neocon Whetdream: A Pearl-Harbor Event. Was this a great country, or what?
CollateralTimbre 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
911 being an inside job is impossible, so you have just contradicted yourself hard here.
theBartone9119 7 months ago
Comment removed
theBartone9119 7 months ago
The ending phrase tells it all: "the truth has nothing to fear from investigation".
Yet the engineers and demolition experts willing to investigate were not allowed. That tells us all about it.
gasto5 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gasto5 "the truth has nothing to fear from investigation"
Investigation has already been done on the collapse of the towers by NIST. FBI ran the criminal investigation 10 years ago, the criminal responsible was killed a few months ago......
I don't think anyone fears a new investigation, it's just too redundant at this point to take serious, don't you think?
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@stig781 you are right, we are #1 in north America. As for the world, we used to be #1 according to the Human Development Index (HDI), although other countries have been rated higher since...but Canada is still just inches from #1. where is the U.S. at?!
mattyelle1 7 months ago
don't waste your time with cowards like LHOooooser,he's a fucking disinfo agent that gets money to stay here on YT covering the truth,there r a lot of morons like him with several accounts,they works for the real terrorists,they r the worst shit in this world.
bernuga 7 months ago
@bernuga don't waste your time with morons like bernuga he's a fucking disinfo agent that gets money to stay here on YT spewing bullshit, there r a lot of morons like him with several accounts,they works for the truth movement, they r the worst shit in this world. Answer the question moron
if WTC 7 was a controlled demo then what type was it, the industry standard name.
Question 2 how was this type rigged? Prove your not a bullshiter
TheLHOser 7 months ago
excellent video. Thank you for all your work and experiments.
louthleviathan 7 months ago
nice video, and we still have a lot of impossible things, starting from pentagon.
bernuga 7 months ago
@bernuga HA HA HA HA This video starts off with a lie HA HA HA HA 4 alive no HA HA HA HA BBC corrected this HA HA HA HA HA
TheLHOser 7 months ago
@TheLHOser Your comment starts and finishes with juvenile BS. The middle is not much better, with no source. There ARE men who claim their identities were stolen by the 9/11 hijackers. Is identity theft a figment of twoofer faggots' imagination?
Skeptic121 7 months ago
@Skeptic121 ok so I was laughing. Best thing really as this video claims these men are alive this is source bbc only. And guess what its wrong as BBC corrected this! Ok question for you and any truther here if WTC 7 was a controlled demo then what type was it, the industry standard name.
Question 2 how was this type rigged?
Prove truthers have any weight in there arguments.
TheLHOser 7 months ago
@TheLHOser Best hypothesis: thermate inside the hollow box columns was used to weaken WTC7 because it makes hardly any noise compared to explosives. Once WTC7 was weakened, just a few small conventional cutter charges would have been enough to bring it down. For details, I would subpoena the construction workers on the CNN video who said "keep your eye on that building it'll be coming down" and "building's gonna blow up". Who were they; who did they work for; what were they doing in WTC7?
Skeptic121 7 months ago
@Skeptic121 NO I was looking for the industry name for this type of controlled demo that is clearly visible in many videos. its called an implosion. but due to the way wtc n7 is constructed this is very difficult to achieve. We also have david chandler proving this type wrong by pointing out some free fall acceleration that does not work in implosions.
As much as people don't believe that fire collapsed the building internally it is the only way for the free fall acceleration to happen.
TheLHOser 7 months ago
@TheLHOser NOTE : The Control demolition used in the WTC was NOT a conventional Control demolition
that is why so many people desagree and are wasting time ...the Pros and Cons are both wrong (and right in a way) CONVENTIONAL CONTROL DEMOLITION WAS NOT USE .
SEARCH THE FOLLOWING (Google Wikipedia) : * "Where did the towers go by Judy Woods" (also in video) * SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munitions)
* MADM ( Medium Atomic Demolition Munitions)
Good Luck in your research
reykool 7 months ago
@reykool "Where did the towers go by Judy Woods" (also in video) * SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munitions) * MADM ( Medium Atomic Demolition Munitions)"
First judy woods Please re read all here stuff then speak to an expert its all miss leading.
Atomic Demolition so they used tis for WTC 1,2 but not 7 as this type of demo dose not create collapses as seen in wtc 7.
Maybe you should think of a theory that makes sense like NIST report. Its an inside job because someone told you wow fool!
TheLHOser 6 months ago
@TheLHOser U don't know but nicely try,SADM, MADM is WTC 1 & 2 ONLY I never said 7, I spent hours speaking with Richard Gage in NY last year and Judy Woods as well, I was there the following day (9/12) there was 1 inch of powder covering everything PLANE & FIRE DON'T REDUCE TOWERS WTC 1&2 INTO POWDER. The NIST report is for fools, my business partner was on the 10th Floor & escaped I also spoke to guys working in WTC 1 basement, major sub basement explosion occurred BEFORE the 1st plane hit
reykool 6 months ago
@Skeptic121 truthers need to come up with real theories not just pluck them from space.
TheLHOser 7 months ago
@TheLHOser Insults are not arguments.
Skeptic121 7 months ago
@TheLHOser SO AS A DEBUNKER GIVE US YOUR THEORY ! OR "PROOF" Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three Presidents Steve R Pieczenik declared that he is prepared to tell a Federal Grand Jury the name of the top General who told him directly 9/11 was a False Flag attack (inside Job) This is very well documented and his interview can be easy found (search Google or others)
Steve Pieczenik works as consultant for the Department of Defense (Harvard Medical School & PhD at MIT)
reykool 7 months ago
@reykool you've fallen into the LHOser's trap... None of Physicsandreason's videos are debatable, that's why people will always try to pull the argument away from the content of this video... you're debating atomic demolition because that's an argument he can manage.
zakquack 6 months ago
@zakquack I did not fall in any trap , ONLY THOSE WHO BELIEVE THE OFFICIAL VERSION DID , don't waste time on HOW because the bottom line is WHO DID Only Intelligence agency insiders and private military contractors know HOW it was DONE many died anyway. I know from the people I talked to (former Intel analysts Pilots and engineers) That 9/11 was a False Flag attack I mentioned different Control demolition Technologies which are unknown from the general public who think only 1 way
reykool 6 months ago
@TheLHOser ANY idiot watching and timing how long it took for the three building to collapse straight on their own foot print would realize it took about NINE seconds from top to bottom Free fall would be 8 seconds so ONLY additional force had to be involved, how ever not all three Building 1 2 and 7 were pulled with the same type of control demolition, 9/11 was a False Flag attack SEARCH (Google) : TOP GOVERNMENT INSIDER : BIN LADEN DIED IN 2001, 9/11 FALSE FLAG ATTACK by Paul J Watson
reykool 6 months ago
@reykool 9 second wow where did this figure come from did you pluck it from your ass or miss read NIST report?
The NIST report is for fools LOL Your thick
Its been 10 years and know ones been able to refute it no expert on earth and as for Richard Gage he is also not qualified to comment on this as proven many times by real experts.
You have your head in the clouds buddy come back to earth your being lied to with all this bullshit.
TheLHOser 6 months ago
@TheLHOser Maybe it's a mistake then if it needs updating. A lie is intentional.
BiteTheBigOne2342 5 months ago
doesn't jet fuel explode?
boomerxxx 7 months ago
Fact is that thermite produces a blinding light that. All the thermite necessary to destroy the WTC would have made the event visible from space.
spidermanstailor 7 months ago
Pyramid at 8:35 :o.
thugftw 7 months ago
sitting on fence still, i however appreciate the presentation thoroughly.
djmolecular 7 months ago
This is one of the best conspiracy films on this subject I have seen. Well done!
kunglek 7 months ago
Lost me when they quoted a fictional character
elprezidente 7 months ago
@elprezidente
And which one is that? ;)
FBIRyan 7 months ago
@elprezidente haha!
thugftw 7 months ago
@elprezidente That's nothing, a lot of those Americans quote some guy called god. I prefer our guy Sherlock to be honest. He smokes a pipe too.
BiteTheBigOne2342 5 months ago
well... ive watched alot of vids on the subject.. seen alot of shit and this is Not shit. america the most corrupt nation in the world.. *sigh* we will all see one day soon the truth about what matters.. people are blinded by the government.. they let themselves be blinded.. have a fucking mind of your own!!!! they are steering this country towards disaster everyday and noone sees the inevitability of it. the next war we participate in will be the one that fucks everyone..
WooZIE997 7 months ago
Some debunkers are confusing SULFIDE and SULFITE. They sound alike but are completely different oxidation states of sulfur. Sulfur dioxide, SO2, reacts with water to form sulfurous acid, which reacts with base to form SULFITE anion. Neither sulfur dioxide nor sulfite will react with iron to form IRON SULFIDE, which Prof. Barnett found on the beam taken from WTC7 debris.
Any questions?
Skeptic121 7 months ago
23 people believe planes brought down the towers, and rabbits come from magician's hats.
ThePatriotMuckraker 7 months ago 23
@ThePatriotMuckraker Why would anyone believe the planes brought them down? If I recall correctly the building stood for another hour each before collapsing.
grandmastershek 7 months ago
@ThePatriotMuckraker How I wish it was only 23.
ShooterInfinity 7 months ago
@ThePatriotMuckraker LMFAO
37rod37 7 months ago
@ThePatriotMuckraker Maybe 657 are wrong.
CarlosBcn1989 5 months ago
@ThePatriotMuckraker buahaha and your some kid in high school who thinks he understands physics because he can watch some youtube video.
TheAlexJonesCult 4 months ago
@TheAlexJonesCult\
"your some kid in high school who thinks he understands physics because he can watch some youtube video."
And you believe the physics that comes for the "idiot box" because some nist fraudster "gummerment" whore or paid presstitute tells you. Btw, the whole "buahaha" is passe & retarded. Seriously, can you dumb-fucks at the dod come up with better comebacks for the trillions of dollars the tax slaves pay for your welfare check? Maybe? I don't think so.
ThePatriotMuckraker 4 months ago
@ThePatriotMuckraker LOL I'm sure you don't even pay taxes kid your mommy and daddy does, witch I'm sure they get there welfare checks LOL every 9/11 myth has been debunked for the countless times. Maybe you should research it.
TheAlexJonesCult 4 months ago
@TheAlexJonesCult
Nice try welfare queen. Nothing has been debunked, only in you criminal syphilitic mind do you take what your daddy "gummerment" tells you and claim it as proof. Gooodby.
ThePatriotMuckraker 4 months ago
@ThePatriotMuckraker LOL I'm a very happy middle class person, and it seems like all you can do is get your facts from youtube videos, maybe if you read a book or did some real research you would know your beliefs are all bullshit anyone can find any information on the internet that proves there beliefs. Guess what if i wanna believe in Aliens i can find a website with "proof" LOL same with bigfoot and nessy and 9/11 lawl
TheAlexJonesCult 4 months ago
@TheAlexJonesCult
I'm sorry government welfare recipient, I don't have time to feed your psychosis. I'm off to beat the shit out of your fellow dis-info agents protecting the banks at the wall street protests. Have a nice day.
ThePatriotMuckraker 4 months ago
@ThePatriotMuckraker LOL! you truthers really crack me up btw being a disinfo agent shill pays pretty good no need for welfare.
TheAlexJonesCult 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheAlexJonesCult even if you disagree with the results of these experiments, you've got to respect the method. Whatever you say is meaningless unless you can back it up within the scientific method. Nothing in this video has been debunked. If you don't understand how NIST is in direct conflict with Newton, you are ignorant to physical laws and need not comment on anything regarding actual science. You'd obviously rather be spoonfed bullshit than work for a meal...
zakquack 4 months ago 14
@zakquack Why hasn;t he submitted any of these studies to a legitimate peer reviewed journal? You know, the part of the scientific method where you submit your results for scrutiny? Oh right truthers do that on youtube. Only the best and brightest here.
grandmastershek 4 months ago
@grandmastershek Very rude... I'd put more effort into writing you back but you're not going to take me seriously... I'd like to point out that Al Qaeda did not exist until post-9/11. What is your motive here? it's obviously not to promote free-thinking.. It's obviously not to promote exchange of ideas... If you don't support those two things, you are an enemy of the truth unfortunately... If you're able to post a polite counter-argument for this video's contents, I am willing to read it.
zakquack 4 months ago
@zakquack Oh I see...more baseless claims then ad hom. What a genius.
So when will we seee them stop running from scrutiny? Yah know, like you are running from answering the question?
grandmastershek 3 months ago
@grandmastershek youre the pot calling the kettle black now.. You ask me to speculate at the motives or reasoning of another and when i ignore such a ridiculous request, you say im running from scrutiny? Ok fine youve goaded me into it.. Perhaps he thought it best to open his studies to the public to scrutinize while refining his formal documents? Perhaps he does not have as much faith in the legitimacy of the others as you do? Perhaps he thinks legitimate scientists can review things here?
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack allot of this has been debunked, and he use's zero scientific method proving the paint flakes are not paint flakes.
MegaYeshua33 2 months ago
@MegaYeshua33 ... Next time, actually watch the dang video youre commenting on.
zakquack 2 months ago
@ThePatriotMuckraker ^^^Ahhh yes another storm-twoofer ready to spring into action. Will Goring be present?
grandmastershek 4 months ago
@grandmastershek
"Will Goring be present?"
I don't know, ask him, he's your father.
ThePatriotMuckraker 4 months ago
@ThePatriotMuckraker "I don't know, ask him, he's your father."
Oh I see what you did there.
grandmastershek 3 months ago
Watch this video. Now add more details such as: WTC 1&2 were designed & built with steel beams that are progressively thicker towards ground level, and foundation. The whole magic pancake theory and crushing collapse is pure quackery.
ThePatriotMuckraker 7 months ago 2
You can hear it now: "Sherlock Holmes was a toofer!"
LOL.
ThePatriotMuckraker 7 months ago
What annoys me the most is that most people didn't even believe me when I said the towers fell too fast, it's understandable however, I was in pre-school. Having a dad that's a physics teacher puts some pressure on you. But that my teacher wouldn't take my explanation is quite frustrating. My parents did however, and they probably noticed it themselves too, but they didn't want to say anything.
SnoweyMan111 8 months ago
@SnoweyMan111 shut the fuck up you little bitch...how can you be so arrogant when you didnt even know wht ur dick was when this happened..fuck you
tnable182 8 months ago
@tnable182 Preschool here:6-7 years old
Who the fuck doesn't know what a dick is by then? And as I said, physics teacher dad. Puts pressure on you. Of cause not everyone knows newtons laws by that age, but if you have gone through school you should, and a majority of people have gone through school. This is basic stuff.
Cmon, I'm not arrogant. It's silly that people didn't react on this, all around the globe, I guess the "investigation" is what kept people quiet, expecting pro's to do shit. No.
SnoweyMan111 8 months ago
@SnoweyMan111 kid your like a junior in high school in another country...how can you be so critical when your on the outside and at an impressionable age? 7 years old in preschool....tht just hurts your post ahah yes you are arrogant, "But that my teacher wouldn't take my explanation is quite frustrating", dude you were fucking 7years you couldnt have formed an opinion tht deep you were just brainwashed by ur parents..understanding newtons laws is as easy as a bible story
tnable182 8 months ago
@SnoweyMan111 and for you to think its as simple as to understand newtons law to explain 9/11 then you and ur parents are delusional and child protective services should be called in (if your country even has that) and also name one scientist tht has been fired or been kept quiet haha and why is your dad a physics teacher? ill tell you why...he probably barely got by with a 2.0 gpa from a bs university and cant get a real job cause through you it shows hes probably a terrible physist
tnable182 8 months ago
@tnable182 No actually he's great. And I get the feeling you're trolling. And that you're getting F's in all your English classes because this shit is hard to read. I'm putting in effort here, I shouldn't speaking to mentally challenged people isn't all that rewarding actually.
So bye.
SnoweyMan111 8 months ago
@SnoweyMan111 yea its the fucking internet sorry mr. spell check and no its because ur dad could get a real job with his 2.0 and has brainwashed his little comrad
tnable182 8 months ago
@tnable182 You make alot of assumptions. Physics is just about the only thing we really agree on. Since it's logical.
How about you go out and get a real sensible view on the world instead of making stupid assumptions out of no info.
I don't see how a single human being can find it worthwhile to speak to you. But clearly, internet anonymity can give the biggest and stupiest cowards spine to puke ignorant shit.
SnoweyMan111 8 months ago
@SnoweyMan111 you still havent offered any explanations other than speculation..i dont have to proven anything you do....your the one how as the burden of proof on this argument
tnable182 8 months ago
@tnable182 You have yet to ask about anything. Period. Ask for something and I will supply an answer, as long as the answer isn't just repeating what's been said in the video.
And of cause. I can't answer any question.
So go ahead and ask.
SnoweyMan111 8 months ago
@SnoweyMan111 wht is your proof it was an inside job...and saying how a building falls or wht happened with the "explosions" is all speculation and theory...make theory, law
tnable182 8 months ago
@tnable182 So you're doubting physics? I never said it was an inside job, but it's highly unlikely that terrorists got into WTC with US (no other countries really use that stuff since it's rather new and developed in the US) explosives and detonated it like that. They tend to only want to send a message. However, the goverment needed to make people angry, and if the buildings didn't fall you could probably see people be alot less hurt.
And the video provides alot of info to answer the physics.
SnoweyMan111 8 months ago
@SnoweyMan111 i dont doubt physics i doubt your SPECULATIONS on 9 11 because you cant prove anything cause if you could it would be all over the news
tnable182 8 months ago
@tnable182 But I told you. I'm not speculating here!!!
God damn you're such a thick moron.
SnoweyMan111 8 months ago
@SnoweyMan111 then offer cold hard proof
tnable182 8 months ago
@tnable182 Hard proof of that the towers fell? Who did it? That it was good for the US goverment?
One of those I can't answer, I can't answer who did it in cold hard proof. But you can't expect say a murderer to put his name on a note and leave it at the victims house. So what you should do is to think a little bit. It's much more likely that the goverment made this scheme and destroyed the WTC, rather than them being attacked and then attacking the wrong nations, twice.
SnoweyMan111 8 months ago
@SnoweyMan111 i dont mind you having you theories but to speak with such confidence and to try to justify yourself by calling everyone else stupid proves nothing for you and conspiracy theorist come off as assholes
tnable182 8 months ago
"..incendiaries, explosives, and controlled demolition.."
After many years of doubt, anger, and being led astray, we are finally waking up from this horrible dream. Trust your fellow man, who has nothing to gain other than reassurance he's not the only one who has a mind of his own. I will never trust the government again. This was no doubt an inside job, but even the truthers believe it was merely a strategy to start wars overseas for oil. I believe the rabbit hole goes way deeper than that!!!!
SirSmok3Alot225 8 months ago
There's little doubt that the US gov used the 9 11 attacks to their advantage, seizing control of an area of political and economic importance! THIS is the REAL CRIME!
However, conspiracy theories that they did the attacks themselves just distract from the real crime. I have no idea whether incriminating reports like sniff dogs being removed are true. But I do have a physics degree, and in my opinion there is no scientific evidence that they brought the buildings down.
boajlp 8 months ago
@boajlp where'd you get that degree from? lol..i'm not trying to mess with you but if you haven't already, you should really watch all the videos on this channel. There IS definitive physical proof.
'physicsandreason' is the only channel that has legitimate experiments
SirSmok3Alot225 8 months ago