lol ford is a straight up POS i know cuz i had a ranger, f150 and a car, no wonder mercury, rangers no longer in production, ford sucks bottom line and no one wants the trash on wheels. always a let down. Chevy will own fords forever nor will i ever own a ford POS again, i dont like walkin or paying tow bills. never walked or had a chevy towed. CHEVY is #1 and always will be and thats a FACT.
@MrPimperston i used to have an 85 as well and when i got a newer ford i tride to kill it and if it went for snaping my front wheels off of everything but the brake lines u could still drive it.
I like the video 1. In my opinion truck pulling is a stupid way to see who's truck is the best
2. I am a Ford man I believe Chevys look amazing compared to fords but I think ford will last longer not based on facts but all the people who I knew who had fords said they would hold up and my whole family loves Chevys
3. Arguing on the Internet is not a bit immature if you ask me but that's my own opinion
4. I drive a 85 Ford Ranger and I love it although it is slow as hell (2.3 4cyl) but I thin
I have been dumb enough to owen 3 ford ranger pickups , have to say not bad to drive back and forth, but for off road, like wet grass or mud they are junk!!!!! the last was a 99 ranger ex cab xlt, 4.0 v6,,,, was hung up more times in that truck than all the cars and trucks i have drove put to gather...... chevy s10,,,, bull proof!!!!!
@clutch2005 I am a fan of small trucks and SUVs in general for offroading. I am in a 97 ranger (i have a cool slideshow if your interested) and in general any small 4x4 truck will suprise people offroad the whole s10 vs ranger argument is stupid because neither of them really have any big design differences, at the end of the day its all about driver. besides stupid pulling contests where the winner gets to fuck their sister first lol
@johnnyboy922 Contrary to what 'clutch2005 said, I know a Ranger can do some extradinary things off road. This last summer I used it in a foot of mud at a country music festival in WI...It rained the whole week and a couple days before hand. It really comes down to tires and how you drive. I made a couple bigger trucks look like shit after they saw what I went through. I was running Bridgestone Dueler ATR's and they only had 20% tread left. Cooper Discoverer's are on it now.GRIPPY!
I would take my 4.3l 4wd s10 over a ranger any day. But... I do love my 66 f250. Pretty much all the new trucks suck. I want to be able to lean on my truck without fear of denting it.
S10 has less weight Probably a 4cyl u can't compare a ranger with that probably a v6 in it and weights more try it with a old ranger not a newer one or with a newer s10 with a 4.3 in it
how can u compar the power of trucks when they arnt even close in production year, you got a mid-80s 215 vs. a 94-96(?) ranger. the diffrence in engine is nothing. its the advantage in traction control and power distrabution in the new truck compared to the straight drive train in the older truck. plus the diffent tires. the list goes on and on. im not running down the video uploader, more the people running down the s15 cus they ford guys.
@hy4ham traction control on a mid 90's 4cyl ranger i dont think so, the fact is the little 6cyl they used to put in those trucks was horrible thats why they didnt have a very long run with them
@hy4ham Traction control? What traction control? Im pretty sure even a 2012 ford ranger doesnt have traction control installed on it. Let alone a 90-whatever that ranger is. If by straight drivetrain you mean front engine rear wheel drive, then both of these truck are the same as far as that goes. To make this fair you could put a an 80's 2.8v6 ranger up to it, but honestly, if that 4 banger ranger pulled the s10, i think the 2.8 ranger would only add insult in to injury in the chevys case
The ranger actually has more towing capibility than the S-10. I haven't looked up power but I assuming it has more, but it could also be that rangers have stronger suspension than s-10's.
@blackhawke10 you can argue it bec ford v8's usually produce less power then chevy, and as far as trucks all together goes, chevy wins by miles, they actually offer locking differentials instead of lsd....
@WoZIMoo i cant find my comment right now and idk what it is but im assuming i said chevy v8s are more powerful and tourquey then ford v8s.... which they may not be anymore but a 95 chevy with a 350 will out muscle a ford up until the new 5.0, and i can say that my s10 with a vortec v6 snapped a rod and still drove half a mile without siezing.....and no coolant
@daboss420edi yeah a 95 350 isnt goin to outmuscle any thing i had a 95 for my first truck. that truck had no balls with only 114.000 miles on it. my friends 92 150 302 efi tows more then my old chevy and my old chevy was pittiful but like that body style and im a ford guy..
You can also note that Chevy fucked everybody in North America. Chevy trucks are notorious pieces of shit and have been behind Ford in sales for over 30 years. If you are going to base a truck on a diff lock than you should go buy a prius. Just because a manufacturer offers it as an "option" dosent mean its worth it. Look at the option price vs buying a PROPER unit from detroit locker. "chevy uses an allison tranny, the same brand as an M1" fuck off. Chevy runs deep into hell.
@sixOHHfour many of the 30 years chev truck won truck of the year and out sold ford, and all ford tranny is bad look up the huge trouble the new mustangs and trucks are having. In my life i have had 4 chevs and 4 fords the trans have went out in all fords but one only thing i had to do to the chevs was say good by due to wreaks that where someone hit me.
@stylinwiley Ford F-series has been the best selling trucks for the past 35+years straight. i have a 2011 5.0 F150 4x4 my trans is fine and i heard nothing of this issue you speak of! your throwin out lies on a vehicle brand you dont like. that shows you really dont know much about vehicles and your just ignorant and blindsided by the fact you dont like ford so you talk mad shit about ford and ford owners. so the fuck what! grow up and get a life.
@1962Galaxie514ciMPFI also the 2011 won Motor Trend magazine's Truck of the Year, fords truck sales are also company and leased return,i only went back to 2000 they are many more years chev has won more awards then ford. they are even times it has out sold ford, and btw i drive a Toyota tundra with the trd charger package on it. and i didn't one time cuss at you i was just stating true facts. now you should grow up and stop picking fights over the internet little boy.
@stylinwiley MOTORTREND? really? lol dont you know motortrend magazine tech editors are biased towards ford and chrysler products? im not lieing either! here in the real world ford trucks tow better than there gm trucks, ford trucks will last longer. my 2011 F150 4x4 5.0 can tow 1,000lbs more than my brothers 2500 gasser. WTH? yes a 2500 and i did! its like gm themselves modifying a superduty so there 2500HD will win some of there own "testing" to show there buyer that gm makes a better truck!
@blackhawke10 hate to tell you but all you see in that ranger is tech from mazda ford owned it at one time just to get its tech for motors and trans then mazda bought back most of the stock ford owned
@Rarrin9378 Its true. I myself have a 92' S10. It has a 2.8l v6. Not a bad engine at all. great gas mileage. I can last a whole month on gas depending if i just drive to work.
@FSHSwookie The one we had had about 300k or so I can't remember exactly but it sat for 3 years and started right up on stale gas. Those were great engines
This is a very fair competion, there really not that far apart in age or horsepower, it is a 1999-01 ranger(117 hp) vs 1986-93 s-10 (125hp) . so could only be 6 years apart and s-10 is rated at more hp
Look at your comment, now back to mine. Now back at your comment now back to mine. Sadly it isn't mine, but if you stopped trolling and started posting legit comments it could look like mine. Look down, back up, where are you? You're scrolling through comments, writing the comment your comment could look like. What did you post? Back at mine, it's a reply saying something you want to hear. Look again the reply is now diamonds. Anything is possible with legit comments. I'm on a chair
@ChrisHill151 sorry but your wrong there. ranger has a 4.9L plus it has POSS locking rear dif. your not going to even budge the ranger. plain and simple.
@wildkyler95 my mistake. it is the 4.0L i was looking at 4.9L engine at the time and made a typo. but still. with the POSS lock. its not going anywhere
@BADprid3 Duhh, especially if the S-10's running anything under the 4.3, it would deffinetly be interesting if they put the S-10 with a 4.3, and the Ranger with the 4.0, both in 4 wheel drive. :p xD
its all a battle of traction. the trucks themselves arent what win. its the tires. the second that ranger loses traction, i could beat it on my bicycle
@MattHutzell i would thinkg they have addressed the issues with the ford 4.0 and trannys by now but it used to be a bad mix. the chevy thing i agree. i don't care for the 2.2, 2.5, or the 2.8. 4.3 is supposed to be a tough motor though. as for the 2.3 and 3.0 that also went into the rangers, i know those are decent motors. how much motor do you need in a pup truck? i've driven all the rangers options and i thought all were fine. just saying.. i do side with ya on the chevys from bad experiences
@blueovalfan23 the 3.0 ranger engine is a pile of garbage and the 2.9 v6 doesnt have enough power to get out of its own way literally. 4.0 is the only good engine- hey its a truck your supposed to be able to haul things with it. thats why you need more power
@demoderbydriver1 i've scrapped almost anything you can name and i've done it all with a f150 with a 300 ci. i'm not talking light loads. i'm tagged for 10,000 and i've clear that by a sizable amount many times. are you doing that with pup truck? no. i've ridden in a 3.0 5speed ranger hauling a super c tractor. it handled it fine. i'm thinking that's good enough. i can't think of anything you would be hauling with a pup truck that would need more than the base models.
@blueovalfan23 the 3.0 has a bit of power but everyone ive ever seen comes apart before 100k mark. either the oil pump quits or it overheats just a little and the head gasgets blow out.. ok so i dont haul as much as you and i prob dont haul nearly as much with as my 4.0 ranger can but why have a 4 cylinder in a truck? you basically can haul groceries in the bed. maybe a small couch. thats about it.
@demoderbydriver1 i have to say, i have seen the opposite out of the 3.0. as for the head gasket going, that's from people not watching the temps. if you pay attention, and stop before it overheats, you'll likely not have that issue. the oil pumps i've never heard of one going bad, not saying that can't or won't. now why have a 4 banger in a truck? fuel ecconomy for starters, not to mention they will do more than you give them credit for. i wouldn't have anything bigger in a pup truck.
@demoderbydriver1 the 4.0 is pretty reliable but in auto its gutless and a gas guzzler. my best buddy owns a 2011 ranger fx4 with a 4.0 auto and the thing cost $90 to fill the tank(gas at about $1.12 in canada) and only lasts 600km i get better milage in my 5.3 sierra with dual 3 inch straight pipes and headers. ive driving both his 4.0 2011 auto and my dads older 90 ranger which had the 2.3l i4 and the i4 was actually faster. the 4.0 ranger my buddy has is slow and bad milage.
@demoderbydriver1 also that 2.3l went to 300xxx km and was bagged everyday and hauled my 06 sierra on a 14 foot tandam axle trailer and we only ever had to do regular maintaince to it. the 4.0l my buddy has already blew a bolt on the headers has a rough shift now from pretty much baggin it and hes already went through a starter and a battery. hes owned the ranger since mid February .
How about you get the 4.3 liter 6 cylinder and see how that goes. I have a ZR2 blazer with the 4.3 and I've out pulled so many rangers. I've also beat the shit out of my buddies in a race
@jcmasterson12 uhmmmm ranger and zr2 blazer arent in the same class bro congrats you can pull a smaller vehiclemaybe if you said Ford explorer or Bronco then ide just laugh at ur pathetic life of a lie
@kappagreen71 haha if your spinning both back wheels you got no traction at all haha just pulling your chain. There are two chevy engines that I relatively dislike. The 2.8 v6 and the 6.5 Detroit. Any four banger can beat the 2.8. I pulled an 89 4x4 blazer with the 2.8 against my moms 08 accord, and I won in the accord. Just turds, but they both get pretty good fuel economh
@GAredneck389 lol ur comparing a older lower hp v6 against a newer closer to 200 hp i4... that civic would beat the 2.5 also. and i have the 2.8l mpfi swapped into my 1985 pontiac acadian with headers and a full 3 inch exhaust with a pair of glasspacks and a k&n cold air intake and its defiantly better than the old i4 that was in it. ive also beaten plenty of civics/rangers u name it if its got a na v6 ive probably beaten it. after the rebuild it had 160 hp and 165 lb-ft tq.
@MrFreak0naleash actualy asshole.....a 2.8 s10 is the same V6 they used in non late 80s early 90s camaros and firebirds. but of course you didnt know that. you own a bolt on ek single cam civic with a shocker sticker on. because you think everything is a 4 banger.
@b4dmunkey Um I own a civic? What retard? I own a 4.3 zr2 Blazer. and it's still a pos just like the early 80s camaros, or any v6 camaro for that matter.
@b4dmunkey broke ass? hmm well idk how u know my bank acount but I assume u have more than a 5 figure savings lol. I own my favorite vehicle, so I'm pretty happy. Zr2's are my favorite truck.
Age of the trucks has a lot to do with it. Have you seen a 80's model truck spin both back wheels.No but 97and newer they spin both back wheels. When you got both back wheels spining you get more traction.
i have a ranger that was givin to me first day i already found shit wrong dealer ship didnt kno fuckn sets r shit everything is manual fuckn door locks and windows r tha vents break i turned a nob to kool down fuckn piece o shit popped out and stereo sucks balls truck rattles bad shit i never wanted it cuz it aint a v8 sports car a shit v6 but oh well it was pretty much given to me but my next car is probably gunna be a chevy with a v8 ford fucks up bad
lol ford is a straight up POS i know cuz i had a ranger, f150 and a car, no wonder mercury, rangers no longer in production, ford sucks bottom line and no one wants the trash on wheels. always a let down. Chevy will own fords forever nor will i ever own a ford POS again, i dont like walkin or paying tow bills. never walked or had a chevy towed. CHEVY is #1 and always will be and thats a FACT.
stevenjack2333 2 days ago
DUMB ASS! You have the engines reversed. DUMB FUCKIN REDNECK!
SuperBilligan 1 week ago
@SuperBilligan ok
nickman888 1 week ago
EX-10!
theblacksheep1000 3 weeks ago
@MrPimperston i used to have an 85 as well and when i got a newer ford i tride to kill it and if it went for snaping my front wheels off of everything but the brake lines u could still drive it.
TheDubStepinz 3 weeks ago
This is like watching your 2 ugly sisters fight
kaizdzag 3 weeks ago
I own four rangers they are great trucks I had one for 20 years
DominicCapone01 3 weeks ago
this is how it is doesnt maker what you drive as long as you know how to drive it
vivalavannah 3 weeks ago
I like the video 1. In my opinion truck pulling is a stupid way to see who's truck is the best
2. I am a Ford man I believe Chevys look amazing compared to fords but I think ford will last longer not based on facts but all the people who I knew who had fords said they would hold up and my whole family loves Chevys
3. Arguing on the Internet is not a bit immature if you ask me but that's my own opinion
4. I drive a 85 Ford Ranger and I love it although it is slow as hell (2.3 4cyl) but I thin
MrPimperston 3 weeks ago
@MrPimperston great reply man =)
praiznhym4ever 3 weeks ago
I have been dumb enough to owen 3 ford ranger pickups , have to say not bad to drive back and forth, but for off road, like wet grass or mud they are junk!!!!! the last was a 99 ranger ex cab xlt, 4.0 v6,,,, was hung up more times in that truck than all the cars and trucks i have drove put to gather...... chevy s10,,,, bull proof!!!!!
clutch2005 1 month ago
@clutch2005 I am a fan of small trucks and SUVs in general for offroading. I am in a 97 ranger (i have a cool slideshow if your interested) and in general any small 4x4 truck will suprise people offroad the whole s10 vs ranger argument is stupid because neither of them really have any big design differences, at the end of the day its all about driver. besides stupid pulling contests where the winner gets to fuck their sister first lol
johnnyboy922 4 weeks ago
@johnnyboy922 Contrary to what 'clutch2005 said, I know a Ranger can do some extradinary things off road. This last summer I used it in a foot of mud at a country music festival in WI...It rained the whole week and a couple days before hand. It really comes down to tires and how you drive. I made a couple bigger trucks look like shit after they saw what I went through. I was running Bridgestone Dueler ATR's and they only had 20% tread left. Cooper Discoverer's are on it now.GRIPPY!
metalginger1 3 weeks ago
@metalginger1 sounds like thunder to me. light is the way to go
johnnyboy922 3 weeks ago
this is like watching 2 midgets fight
domenicd123 1 month ago
aff
ludrico1001 1 month ago
S10 is and allways will be better than found on road dead
MrAnthonyMildred 1 month ago
@MrAnthonyMildred dude powerstroke yanks duramax
ttgallardolover 1 month ago
@MrAnthonyMildred Listen buddy I own a s-10 but dont be putting down fords like that. every motor company has their ups and downs.
nickman888 1 week ago
ill hook a stock ranger to my stock s10 anyday lets see what happens ive already done it once
dsj0501 1 month ago
@dsj0501 wanna drop chains with my dully and see what happens hahaha
gittyupalice96 1 month ago
@gittyupalice96 yup
dsj0501 1 month ago
@dsj0501 do i get to change the tires?
goodinsrt8 1 month ago
@goodinsrt8 why i dont do no sissy pavement pulling
dsj0501 1 month ago
@dsj0501 getting scared?
goodinsrt8 1 month ago
@goodinsrt8 hints the sissy pavement pulling.
dsj0501 1 month ago
@dsj0501 so you are scared
goodinsrt8 1 month ago
' there gona hit ur subaru' HAHA best thing that could happen to that peice of jalopy shit.
blandishblaze 1 month ago
LA S10 ES MUCHO MAS LIGERA,, QUE PENDJOS
lucila919 1 month ago
Ford ranger the last great truck
chillywinter16 1 month ago
ranger
JhonnycageZz11 1 month ago
lol at people basing quality on Motor Trend's articles. Motor Trend is biased towards whoever gives them the most ad money.
mcrissjr 2 months ago
Wat is tht i hear.... Is that the sound of chevy bitches using lame excuses
Trebuer22 2 months ago 2
I would take my 4.3l 4wd s10 over a ranger any day. But... I do love my 66 f250. Pretty much all the new trucks suck. I want to be able to lean on my truck without fear of denting it.
coors628 2 months ago
at a start the weight advantage will allways win . i could put a dump truck with a scooter motor in it and beat you both lol ..
speedmagnet24 2 months ago
Ford trucks have more torque built into them. Chevy trucks have better body style and looks
oscarisdaman15 2 months ago
Thats like an '03 ranger model vs. a '84 s10. Really?
oscarisdaman15 2 months ago
i still would never buy a ford.... :P
LAYNLOWS10 2 months ago
S10 has less weight Probably a 4cyl u can't compare a ranger with that probably a v6 in it and weights more try it with a old ranger not a newer one or with a newer s10 with a 4.3 in it
jj629ful 2 months ago
@jj629ful They tried, but the chevy wouldn't start lol. It says in the vid that the ranger is a 4 banger vs. 6cyl chev.
sixOHHfour 2 months ago
the best at goin backrupt
mlsj15airgunner 2 months ago
FUCK FORD THIS VIDEO IS FALSE GM IS THE BEST
jonhy455 2 months ago
@jonhy455 GM took bailout money. Ford didn't
Hawkins1117 2 months ago
i used to drive a 2wd sonoma work truck. that thing woulg get stuck on a banana peel on level ground. no traction whatsoever.
rhigh100 2 months ago 13
@rhigh100 those things literally weigh only 300 lbs in the rear end
goodinsrt8 1 month ago
@rhigh100 What year?
DDFJ1230 3 weeks ago
GM sucks
nfsmw6 3 months ago
my 90 ranger with 2.9 v6 5 speed stick would tear both of these trucks apart! lil ass truck got balls
Moose82690 3 months ago
can this damage your vehicle in anyway?
slippy575 3 months ago
fuck chevy
snootchynoontchys 3 months ago
how can u compar the power of trucks when they arnt even close in production year, you got a mid-80s 215 vs. a 94-96(?) ranger. the diffrence in engine is nothing. its the advantage in traction control and power distrabution in the new truck compared to the straight drive train in the older truck. plus the diffent tires. the list goes on and on. im not running down the video uploader, more the people running down the s15 cus they ford guys.
hy4ham 3 months ago 23
@hy4ham agreed
monox1de1 3 months ago
@hy4ham traction control on a mid 90's 4cyl ranger i dont think so, the fact is the little 6cyl they used to put in those trucks was horrible thats why they didnt have a very long run with them
ilguy81 1 month ago
@hy4ham The Ford Ranger never had traction control until 2010, and that there is not newer than '04.
This is just a stupid way to compare vehicles in general
mannwhosoldtheworld 1 month ago
@hy4ham chevys are junk compared to the old faithful fords.i ought to know.i had two chevy junk piles.
royearlbanister 6 days ago
@hy4ham Traction control? What traction control? Im pretty sure even a 2012 ford ranger doesnt have traction control installed on it. Let alone a 90-whatever that ranger is. If by straight drivetrain you mean front engine rear wheel drive, then both of these truck are the same as far as that goes. To make this fair you could put a an 80's 2.8v6 ranger up to it, but honestly, if that 4 banger ranger pulled the s10, i think the 2.8 ranger would only add insult in to injury in the chevys case
SaGalv 2 days ago
the chevy even has a bigger engine hahahah
4Malice 3 months ago
the ranger looks way bigger?
zako1998 3 months ago
The ranger actually has more towing capibility than the S-10. I haven't looked up power but I assuming it has more, but it could also be that rangers have stronger suspension than s-10's.
4Malice 3 months ago
my 2003 4.0 ranger with 330000 km has out lasted all my buddy s10's still emision free and doesnt burn a drop of oil
swjt80 3 months ago
What a brilliant way to compare two pickups.
cspringer007 3 months ago
01 ford rangers was and is my first truck, and that will never change
ExileMCR 3 months ago
my s-10 has a 4.3 vortec I dont have to worry aout sissy rangers,sorry that happen to you bro!
pv2ladner21 4 months ago
@pv2ladner21 ive got the same one, there better then a ranger any day
Djumpps 3 months ago
@pv2ladner21 Sissy? The ranger can kick the S-10s ass anyday.
MicroOrginisum 3 months ago
@pv2ladner21 Haha.
88Lbody 3 months ago
ford make good engin exept for the lemonstoke no100000 mile waranty
420crunk1 4 months ago
AH fuck bring out to me and let me use my s10 it will fuck up that ford And next time start the engine in the chevy so it can try and slam it in 2nd
themanisback3 4 months ago
I'm surprised the 20-year-old (or more) S10 is still going, the earlier models, like this one, stunk when they were brand new.
thebigdawg61 4 months ago
the v6 is a 4.3 you jew
diiiip69 4 months ago
@diiiip69 If you actually new anything chevys 2.8 is a v6 you jew....
bbbrenden 4 months ago
I like watching other people tear up their cars.
account4info 4 months ago
this is stupid. ranger sits higher and weighs more. horsepower has nothing to do with it. its all about traction and this is in no way equal.....
evoracer11 4 months ago
Cunts!!
buttmanroad 4 months ago
Ranger? Lol Ees a Mazda. Nice job beating a clunky American V6 with a japanophile inline 4.
peepeevagi 4 months ago
@peepeevagi to bad a ranger is also american dumbass
blackhawke10 4 months ago
@blackhawke10 Nope. It's based off a light truck ultimately designed by mazda :D
peepeevagi 4 months ago
@peepeevagi but the important part which is the engine is made by Ford which is the company who currently makes the best truck engines
blackhawke10 4 months ago
@blackhawke10 Best? Lol sure. As far as inline engines go, nissan has the best inline truck engines.
peepeevagi 4 months ago
@peepeevagi for inline ford makes amazing mpg for trucks but nissan has much better power. But i was mainly talking about the V8's
blackhawke10 4 months ago
@blackhawke10 Their V8's are better? Wat. LOL no.
peepeevagi 4 months ago
@peepeevagi ford makes way better V8's than any other company i know and i really don't see anyway you can argue against
blackhawke10 4 months ago
@blackhawke10 chevy makes better v8 mpgs check mate ford got it right with the twin turbo v6
wtl1964 3 months ago
@blackhawke10 you can argue it bec ford v8's usually produce less power then chevy, and as far as trucks all together goes, chevy wins by miles, they actually offer locking differentials instead of lsd....
daboss420edi 3 months ago
@daboss420edi Ford V8's produce less than GM, you sure about that?? Anyways, you're wrong.
WoZIMoo 2 months ago
@WoZIMoo i cant find my comment right now and idk what it is but im assuming i said chevy v8s are more powerful and tourquey then ford v8s.... which they may not be anymore but a 95 chevy with a 350 will out muscle a ford up until the new 5.0, and i can say that my s10 with a vortec v6 snapped a rod and still drove half a mile without siezing.....and no coolant
daboss420edi 2 months ago
@daboss420edi yeah a 95 350 isnt goin to outmuscle any thing i had a 95 for my first truck. that truck had no balls with only 114.000 miles on it. my friends 92 150 302 efi tows more then my old chevy and my old chevy was pittiful but like that body style and im a ford guy..
1962Galaxie514ciMPFI 2 months ago
@daboss420edi
You can also note that Chevy fucked everybody in North America. Chevy trucks are notorious pieces of shit and have been behind Ford in sales for over 30 years. If you are going to base a truck on a diff lock than you should go buy a prius. Just because a manufacturer offers it as an "option" dosent mean its worth it. Look at the option price vs buying a PROPER unit from detroit locker. "chevy uses an allison tranny, the same brand as an M1" fuck off. Chevy runs deep into hell.
sixOHHfour 2 months ago 3
@sixOHHfour many of the 30 years chev truck won truck of the year and out sold ford, and all ford tranny is bad look up the huge trouble the new mustangs and trucks are having. In my life i have had 4 chevs and 4 fords the trans have went out in all fords but one only thing i had to do to the chevs was say good by due to wreaks that where someone hit me.
stylinwiley 2 months ago
@stylinwiley Ford F-series has been the best selling trucks for the past 35+years straight. i have a 2011 5.0 F150 4x4 my trans is fine and i heard nothing of this issue you speak of! your throwin out lies on a vehicle brand you dont like. that shows you really dont know much about vehicles and your just ignorant and blindsided by the fact you dont like ford so you talk mad shit about ford and ford owners. so the fuck what! grow up and get a life.
1962Galaxie514ciMPFI 2 months ago
@1962Galaxie514ciMPFI 1999 - Motor Trend magazine's Truck of the Year
2001 - Motor Trend magazine's Truck of the Year (Heavy Duty Model)
2001 - Car and Driver magazine's Best Pickup Truck
2002 - Car and Driver magazine's Best Pickup Truck
2003 - Car and Driver magazine's Best Pickup Truck
2007 - North American Truck of the Year
2007 - Motor Trend magazine's Truck of the Year
2007 - ICOTY International Truck of the Year[15]
2007 - Truckin' magazine's Truck of the Year
stylinwiley 2 months ago
@1962Galaxie514ciMPFI also the 2011 won Motor Trend magazine's Truck of the Year, fords truck sales are also company and leased return,i only went back to 2000 they are many more years chev has won more awards then ford. they are even times it has out sold ford, and btw i drive a Toyota tundra with the trd charger package on it. and i didn't one time cuss at you i was just stating true facts. now you should grow up and stop picking fights over the internet little boy.
stylinwiley 2 months ago
@stylinwiley MOTORTREND? really? lol dont you know motortrend magazine tech editors are biased towards ford and chrysler products? im not lieing either! here in the real world ford trucks tow better than there gm trucks, ford trucks will last longer. my 2011 F150 4x4 5.0 can tow 1,000lbs more than my brothers 2500 gasser. WTH? yes a 2500 and i did! its like gm themselves modifying a superduty so there 2500HD will win some of there own "testing" to show there buyer that gm makes a better truck!
1962Galaxie514ciMPFI 2 months ago
@blackhawke10 Newer ones like this one anyway.
peepeevagi 4 months ago
@blackhawke10 hate to tell you but all you see in that ranger is tech from mazda ford owned it at one time just to get its tech for motors and trans then mazda bought back most of the stock ford owned
stylinwiley 2 months ago
RANGER!!
squarecnix 4 months ago
"Hey guys lets go out and destroy our tires and fuck our trucks up!!!" Seems like a good idea when mom and dad pay for it lol.
Paul161816 4 months ago
2.8 v6? I have a 4.3 v6 in mine.
wickedmainah524 4 months ago
@wickedmainah524 The older S-10's had 2.8 V6 engine's, My dad used to have one.
Rarrin9378 4 months ago
@Rarrin9378 Its true. I myself have a 92' S10. It has a 2.8l v6. Not a bad engine at all. great gas mileage. I can last a whole month on gas depending if i just drive to work.
FSHSwookie 4 months ago
@FSHSwookie The one we had had about 300k or so I can't remember exactly but it sat for 3 years and started right up on stale gas. Those were great engines
Rarrin9378 4 months ago
This is a very fair competion, there really not that far apart in age or horsepower, it is a 1999-01 ranger(117 hp) vs 1986-93 s-10 (125hp) . so could only be 6 years apart and s-10 is rated at more hp
calvinmathers 4 months ago
Comment removed
calvinmathers 4 months ago
Comment removed
calvinmathers 4 months ago
Look at your comment, now back to mine. Now back at your comment now back to mine. Sadly it isn't mine, but if you stopped trolling and started posting legit comments it could look like mine. Look down, back up, where are you? You're scrolling through comments, writing the comment your comment could look like. What did you post? Back at mine, it's a reply saying something you want to hear. Look again the reply is now diamonds. Anything is possible with legit comments. I'm on a chair
Thomaseddy83 4 months ago
My 91 s10 looks just like that but mines a 4,3L that ranger wouldnt stand a chance ha
ChrisHill151 5 months ago
@ChrisHill151 sorry but your wrong there. ranger has a 4.9L plus it has POSS locking rear dif. your not going to even budge the ranger. plain and simple.
BADprid3 5 months ago
@ChrisHill151 at least most rangers have the 4.9L. that one has the 2.5L but still. comparing apples to apples. Ford wins.
BADprid3 5 months ago
@BADprid3 Really? I thought the biggest motors that were in the Rangers, were the 4.0?
wildkyler95 5 months ago
@wildkyler95 my mistake. it is the 4.0L i was looking at 4.9L engine at the time and made a typo. but still. with the POSS lock. its not going anywhere
BADprid3 4 months ago
@BADprid3 Duhh, especially if the S-10's running anything under the 4.3, it would deffinetly be interesting if they put the S-10 with a 4.3, and the Ranger with the 4.0, both in 4 wheel drive. :p xD
wildkyler95 4 months ago
@wildkyler95 agreed! somone needs to put it to the test!
BADprid3 4 months ago
@BADprid3 I'm sure someone will xD
wildkyler95 4 months ago
cant even compare an old ass truck like that against a newer truck hell that 2.8 v6 is shit only pushing 115hp
chatmatchamp 5 months ago
hell ya ford rangers are badass ive got one and that thing will do anything
icebag4 5 months ago
its all a battle of traction. the trucks themselves arent what win. its the tires. the second that ranger loses traction, i could beat it on my bicycle
crazytacostudios 5 months ago
@crazytacostudios Challenge accepted
D13fledermause 5 months ago
@D13fledermause meet me at the twin pines mall at 1:15 am
crazytacostudios 5 months ago
@crazytacostudios Make it 1 o'clock sharp and it's a deal
D13fledermause 5 months ago
look at the sizes.
nuttygijoe 5 months ago
Ford 1 chevy 0
yamaharider1997 5 months ago
lol chevy sucks, always losing to Ford
AdverbAdjective 5 months ago
Ick, I wouldn't get either truck. The 4.0V6 and the 4.3V6 are the only motors that should be in these trucks.
MattHutzell 6 months ago
@MattHutzell i would thinkg they have addressed the issues with the ford 4.0 and trannys by now but it used to be a bad mix. the chevy thing i agree. i don't care for the 2.2, 2.5, or the 2.8. 4.3 is supposed to be a tough motor though. as for the 2.3 and 3.0 that also went into the rangers, i know those are decent motors. how much motor do you need in a pup truck? i've driven all the rangers options and i thought all were fine. just saying.. i do side with ya on the chevys from bad experiences
blueovalfan23 5 months ago
@blueovalfan23 the 3.0 ranger engine is a pile of garbage and the 2.9 v6 doesnt have enough power to get out of its own way literally. 4.0 is the only good engine- hey its a truck your supposed to be able to haul things with it. thats why you need more power
demoderbydriver1 5 months ago
@demoderbydriver1 i've scrapped almost anything you can name and i've done it all with a f150 with a 300 ci. i'm not talking light loads. i'm tagged for 10,000 and i've clear that by a sizable amount many times. are you doing that with pup truck? no. i've ridden in a 3.0 5speed ranger hauling a super c tractor. it handled it fine. i'm thinking that's good enough. i can't think of anything you would be hauling with a pup truck that would need more than the base models.
blueovalfan23 5 months ago
@blueovalfan23 the 3.0 has a bit of power but everyone ive ever seen comes apart before 100k mark. either the oil pump quits or it overheats just a little and the head gasgets blow out.. ok so i dont haul as much as you and i prob dont haul nearly as much with as my 4.0 ranger can but why have a 4 cylinder in a truck? you basically can haul groceries in the bed. maybe a small couch. thats about it.
demoderbydriver1 5 months ago
@demoderbydriver1 i have to say, i have seen the opposite out of the 3.0. as for the head gasket going, that's from people not watching the temps. if you pay attention, and stop before it overheats, you'll likely not have that issue. the oil pumps i've never heard of one going bad, not saying that can't or won't. now why have a 4 banger in a truck? fuel ecconomy for starters, not to mention they will do more than you give them credit for. i wouldn't have anything bigger in a pup truck.
blueovalfan23 5 months ago
@demoderbydriver1 the 4.0 is pretty reliable but in auto its gutless and a gas guzzler. my best buddy owns a 2011 ranger fx4 with a 4.0 auto and the thing cost $90 to fill the tank(gas at about $1.12 in canada) and only lasts 600km i get better milage in my 5.3 sierra with dual 3 inch straight pipes and headers. ive driving both his 4.0 2011 auto and my dads older 90 ranger which had the 2.3l i4 and the i4 was actually faster. the 4.0 ranger my buddy has is slow and bad milage.
denny099999999 5 months ago
@denny099999999 your problem, auto tranny.
demoderbydriver1 5 months ago
@demoderbydriver1 also that 2.3l went to 300xxx km and was bagged everyday and hauled my 06 sierra on a 14 foot tandam axle trailer and we only ever had to do regular maintaince to it. the 4.0l my buddy has already blew a bolt on the headers has a rough shift now from pretty much baggin it and hes already went through a starter and a battery. hes owned the ranger since mid February .
denny099999999 5 months ago
sharp ass S10. pull out that junk 2.8 and drop in a little 4.3, kill the shit ranger
MrDbzrapman 6 months ago
How about you get the 4.3 liter 6 cylinder and see how that goes. I have a ZR2 blazer with the 4.3 and I've out pulled so many rangers. I've also beat the shit out of my buddies in a race
jcmasterson12 6 months ago
@jcmasterson12 uhmmmm ranger and zr2 blazer arent in the same class bro congrats you can pull a smaller vehiclemaybe if you said Ford explorer or Bronco then ide just laugh at ur pathetic life of a lie
QzRePiNN9Na 6 months ago
Chevy 4.3 v6 would have kicked it's ass. But that's what you get for being dumb and buying the lesser
TheFunnymonsta 6 months ago
Tug of Wars are as pointless as anything. It is the weight and the drive of the truck it is in. ( 4x4 or4x2 )
thenixter101 6 months ago
@kappagreen71 haha if your spinning both back wheels you got no traction at all haha just pulling your chain. There are two chevy engines that I relatively dislike. The 2.8 v6 and the 6.5 Detroit. Any four banger can beat the 2.8. I pulled an 89 4x4 blazer with the 2.8 against my moms 08 accord, and I won in the accord. Just turds, but they both get pretty good fuel economh
GAredneck389 6 months ago
@GAredneck389 lol ur comparing a older lower hp v6 against a newer closer to 200 hp i4... that civic would beat the 2.5 also. and i have the 2.8l mpfi swapped into my 1985 pontiac acadian with headers and a full 3 inch exhaust with a pair of glasspacks and a k&n cold air intake and its defiantly better than the old i4 that was in it. ive also beaten plenty of civics/rangers u name it if its got a na v6 ive probably beaten it. after the rebuild it had 160 hp and 165 lb-ft tq.
denny099999999 5 months ago
This is why I own a ranger. I got the bigger engine 4.0 V6
Needled247420 6 months ago
Ford whoopin' Chevy ass...Excuse me...I just have to wipe away a happy tear.
kl0525288 6 months ago
like a rock......yeah more like a pebble
jrb2014 6 months ago
so many butthurt chevy fanboys......
mitch9521 6 months ago
if it wasnt for ford chevy wuldnt even b alive 2day
dextrain6 6 months ago
@dextrain6 bull freaking crap
zako1998 6 months ago
pussy trucks
itsmrmantoyou 6 months ago
2.8 had to much torc and not enouf wait the ranger had to much grip that 2.8 would smoke that ranger on the open road
davidburchfield181 6 months ago
*z28
b4dmunkey 6 months ago
2.8l S10 is a v6.
12eatit 6 months ago
get a newer ranger and a s10/colorado the chevy wud win hands down
eskimochild87 6 months ago
I raced a 9something s10 in a honda accord I was voin bout 120 and he still beat me fuck
jdeere5611 6 months ago
um the 2.8 is also a 4banger and that ford is a decade newer you inbred morons.
MrFreak0naleash 6 months ago
@MrFreak0naleash actualy asshole.....a 2.8 s10 is the same V6 they used in non late 80s early 90s camaros and firebirds. but of course you didnt know that. you own a bolt on ek single cam civic with a shocker sticker on. because you think everything is a 4 banger.
b4dmunkey 6 months ago 2
@b4dmunkey Um I own a civic? What retard? I own a 4.3 zr2 Blazer. and it's still a pos just like the early 80s camaros, or any v6 camaro for that matter.
MrFreak0naleash 6 months ago
@MrFreak0naleash thats because your broke ass cant afford a wynjammer lol.
b4dmunkey 6 months ago
@b4dmunkey broke ass? hmm well idk how u know my bank acount but I assume u have more than a 5 figure savings lol. I own my favorite vehicle, so I'm pretty happy. Zr2's are my favorite truck.
MrFreak0naleash 6 months ago
Age of the trucks has a lot to do with it. Have you seen a 80's model truck spin both back wheels.No but 97and newer they spin both back wheels. When you got both back wheels spining you get more traction.
kappagreen71 6 months ago
wider tires on the ford so.... traction
mack2thefuture 6 months ago
bitch
MrFishindude 6 months ago
@SLEEVEofWIZARD1 my ranger will waste any striaght six u find. just hope you got some chains to pull it home man.
Hitman1490 7 months ago
the ranger is much newer than the s10 and the ranger is a bit higher... FUCK FORD
yolyiroc 7 months ago
@yolyiroc age of the truck has nothin to do with it
redneksk8er 6 months ago
you can tell that ranger is taller lifting the back of the s-10 so the s10 gets less traction
JoshuaVandeWeerd 7 months ago
la ranger trai mejores llantas talvez eso le ayude un poco por q la s10 no trai buena llantan que se amarre al piso
mnyeav 7 months ago
yay my ranger won :)
KamikazeScarecrows 7 months ago
HIGH SCHOOL KIDS
ghettobraden 7 months ago
no mamen pendejosla pobre s10 es mas vieja pongan una ranger con una nissan z22 o z24 y van a ver como larenger vale pa pura mierda
pitchshifter001 7 months ago
If I had my 97 S10 ZR2 with the 4.3L V6 I could have pulled your little dinky ranger to china and back.
KkF00 7 months ago
i have a ranger that was givin to me first day i already found shit wrong dealer ship didnt kno fuckn sets r shit everything is manual fuckn door locks and windows r tha vents break i turned a nob to kool down fuckn piece o shit popped out and stereo sucks balls truck rattles bad shit i never wanted it cuz it aint a v8 sports car a shit v6 but oh well it was pretty much given to me but my next car is probably gunna be a chevy with a v8 ford fucks up bad
DJ4000VOLT 7 months ago
Ford, may the best never rest!
jongies1 7 months ago
Well that Ranger is much newer than the S10...
1mlb704 7 months ago
@1mlb704 The basic design of the ranger hasn't changed since 93 so age doesn't matter much.
112428 6 months ago
the ranger it's piece of shit
sistem65 7 months ago