Hi bro, rocking the beard! I really appreciate the response very much--it's a subject I've been a bit unsure about and these responses are f*@%ing excellent. The more knowledge and insight I get from scientists and engineers the better, and these are the people who's opinions I respect the most on such issues.
I made my point 'centralization has historically not worked....etc' kind of cautiously, cos I know nothing about engineering, so I labelled it 'central planning'....cnt
....cntnd (lol, the last comment was supposed to end with an abbreviation for continued but it looks like an abbreviation for another word). So 'central planning' as some people criticize I think is a passe criticism of communistic politics and social planning, but this is about engineering and science and as you said, social evolution.
You've hit the nail on the head on the fears people have. Top-down corrupt control people fear. I'll use the apple example!
Great conservatives liberals comment too, and about evolution. I wanted to add, the problem I often say with our current system is that it is not actually scientific (modern market economics: monetary-ism) and as it continues to homogenous and unify, one problem has a butterfly effect that buggers the whole thing (global crisis instead of being contained or buffered). That is bad, but (a) that's the way we are moving anyway, and (b) it isn't a scientific system anyway (capitalism).
I'll stop ranting, but this is a new subject for me. My conclusion is that it seems the parsimonious, scientific answer to potential flaws/weaknesses/brittleness is fail safe and redundancy mechanisms, not a thousand so-called varieties as has been in the answer in market economics. I think scientists know this, but most people don't. Cheers.
Good response! Thanks for taking time to elaborate on these issues.
ivanlezhnjovjr 2 months ago
I understand you!!! Yeahh, wel explained!!
sexyslim1982 7 months ago
"Everyone has access to a hat" vs. "everyone has to wear black hats" Perfect example. Thank you. Great vid by the way.
TVPchallenge 7 months ago
Gadzo - I do not want to see you in a thong! lmao. Other than that, I like everything else you've said. :)
TZMSocialEvolution 1 year ago
@TZMSocialEvolution Oh dude.. I should clarify. In Australia, thongs are flip flops.. lol
I just realised that I may have traumatised everyone who watched this video.
gadzometer 1 year ago 5
@gadzometer lmao. That makes this even funnier. lmao.
TZMSocialEvolution 1 year ago
@TZMSocialEvolution Agreed.
TVPchallenge 7 months ago
@gadzometer lmmfao
TVPchallenge 7 months ago
Hi bro, rocking the beard! I really appreciate the response very much--it's a subject I've been a bit unsure about and these responses are f*@%ing excellent. The more knowledge and insight I get from scientists and engineers the better, and these are the people who's opinions I respect the most on such issues.
I made my point 'centralization has historically not worked....etc' kind of cautiously, cos I know nothing about engineering, so I labelled it 'central planning'....cnt
Neanderthalcouzin 1 year ago
....cntnd (lol, the last comment was supposed to end with an abbreviation for continued but it looks like an abbreviation for another word). So 'central planning' as some people criticize I think is a passe criticism of communistic politics and social planning, but this is about engineering and science and as you said, social evolution.
You've hit the nail on the head on the fears people have. Top-down corrupt control people fear. I'll use the apple example!
Neanderthalcouzin 1 year ago
Great conservatives liberals comment too, and about evolution. I wanted to add, the problem I often say with our current system is that it is not actually scientific (modern market economics: monetary-ism) and as it continues to homogenous and unify, one problem has a butterfly effect that buggers the whole thing (global crisis instead of being contained or buffered). That is bad, but (a) that's the way we are moving anyway, and (b) it isn't a scientific system anyway (capitalism).
Neanderthalcouzin 1 year ago
I'll stop ranting, but this is a new subject for me. My conclusion is that it seems the parsimonious, scientific answer to potential flaws/weaknesses/brittleness is fail safe and redundancy mechanisms, not a thousand so-called varieties as has been in the answer in market economics. I think scientists know this, but most people don't. Cheers.
Neanderthalcouzin 1 year ago
Comment removed
FractalInfinities 1 year ago
@FractalInfinities Let's not forget the Zerg.
gadzometer 1 year ago
@FractalInfinities TVP
Textured Veg Protien! haha
Soilent Green
Namaste
jcherpaw1 1 year ago