You, who uploaded this, don't even know how long a radio signal takes from Earth to Moon. And clearly don't even have heard of "count down". You are the last ignorant to be qualified to tell if the lunar landings were real or not...
Another paranoid nutjob airing his miseducated viewpoint.
A controller at NASA sent the signal to the camera to pan upward 1.3 seconds before the LM lifted off. The signal arrived at the moon (1.3 seconds later) just as the ascent stage ignited. The camera thus followed the ascent stage upward as it took off.
It's really very simple. And somewhere, some hoax proponent is saying, "that doesn't make any sense." Sighhhhhh.
I find it funny you tend to ignore apollo 16. Same set up, but Ed Fendell messed up his timing. And interestingly how Apollo 15 is also ignored where the craft takes off but the camera fails to move. Please get your facts right before making wild accusations.
This looks like one of those 50s sci fi space travel animations, where you can clearly see the objects hanging on a string. With that said this seems convincing that the whole ascent, descent, and exploration on the lunar surface was filmed here on earth. Plus how could the crew have been shielded from the harsh radiation past the van allen belt?
In both the decent and accent bullshit stage the TVs were showing some very convincing animations at exactly the same time as this"real" event supposedly happened.Go and search for clips on the YT. to see how the criminals of NASA deceived the public.
You thicko, they listened to the countdown on Earth and panned the camera 1.3 seconds before lift off and 1.3 seconds later at the 0 count the launch button is pushed and the camera pans up at the same time, it does not take 3 seconds! and since the camera was a bit away from the ship there was a bit of leeway if it was a bit late or early, but |I would not expect a dumb ass like you to take that all in.
You are damn right. I blame the internet for conspiracy bullshit. Any asshole with a cable modem can put his non-peer reviewed, ridiculously illogical bullshit on the internet, and thousands of other assholes can collectively circle-jerk over it.
These hoax heads all think they are able to outsmart 40+ years worth of science & engineering. What a laugh.
@Rob260259 You blame the internet? that's a laugh. When I was a kid my dad was into the whole NASA.moon experience, and he told me how hot/freezing the surface of the moon was, and how low the gravity. He said the men would be able to jump 20 feet into the air. I was excited to watch the moon landings. We sat and sat, and hours of blurry pictures later, man "stepped" onto the moon. There was no bouncing. What a freakin disappointment for a kid. No bouncing at all. I had no internet.
Then later I saw the LEM at the Smithsonian. I was so confused that I asked the guard, "now is this a model or the real thing?" It had thin sides made of gold colored tinfoil. "It's the real thing?" He said. I said, "You're telling me 3 guys could fit in there and move around and not tear through that tinfoil?" The guard just shrugged, shook his head, and acted like he didn't believe that either. "What?" I said, "This makes no sense." I didn't have internet. Then as an adult...
...as an adult I resaw the moon footage in a film after I'd worked with the play Peter Pan that some of my friends were in. I saw my friends being jerked around in practise, then they got good at it, but still there was some jerkiness. On opening day, my friend flew out over the audience, and kids believed it, even though they could see the ropes. It was a miracle! When I saw the astronauts being jerked around, all the way through, I realized they were on wires; it looked exactly the same.
the internet is a good tool. I can share my doubts for almost free, and you can keep your paid shill job, sitting there trying to put the pieces of broken glass back together....
There is a mission clock on the CM and the LM and at mission control that were all synchronised when the ship lifted off. The assent of the LM was at a pre determined time, hens how mission control knew when to point the camera up. This is a weak argument.
They knew exactly when the LEM was going up. They planned this ahead of time. To get the most efficient liftoff, they had a launch window of a few seconds. They knew exactly when the liftoff was coming. Also, they knew what the launch procedures were. They knew how the ascent stage was going to move in the picture, and programmed the camera to follow it. Your argument doesn't hold water.
This was not Armstrong. Also, they tried this once before, see Apollo 16 take off. As well, the 'off a screen' was only for the slow scan video, a kinescope to convert it to broadcast standard. Apollo 17 video wasn't slow scan. It took a lot of practise, yes. But Ed Fendell knew when the LM was going to take off as there was a countdown. He also knew how fast the camera could tilt. By doing math he could know how far they had to place the rover to shoot the LM. Hard? Yes. Impossible? No.
To summarize this, the White Trash from Europe settled in North America. They purchased the Black Trash of Africa to use as slaves. The Brown Trash from Portugal and Spain settled in Central and South America. And today the White Trash in America is using the Brown Trash as replacements to the Black Trash.
Are you suprised that North and South America have high levels of corruption, crime, wild behavior, dishonesty, selfishness, and mental illness?
To summarize this, the White Trash from Europe settled in North America. They purchased the Black Trash of Africa to use as slaves. The Brown Trash from Portugal and Spain settled in Central and South America. And today the White Trash in America is using the Brown Trash as replacements to the Black Trash.
Are you suprised that North and South America have high levels of corruption, crime, wild behavior, dishonesty, selfishness, and mental illness?
To summarize this, the White Trash from Europe settled in North America. They purchased the Black Trash of Africa to use as slaves. The Brown Trash from Portugal and Spain settled in Central and South America. And today the White Trash in America is using the Brown Trash as replacements to the Black Trash.
Are you suprised that North and South America have high levels of corruption, crime, wild behavior, dishonesty, selfishness, and mental illness?
To summarize this, the White Trash from Europe settled in North America. They purchased the Black Trash of Africa to use as slaves. The Brown Trash from Portugal and Spain settled in Central and South America. And today the White Trash in America is using the Brown Trash as replacements to the Black Trash.
Are you suprised that North and South America have high levels of corruption, crime, wild behavior, dishonesty, selfishness, and mental illness?
@anodeenzyme i agree with and the obviously went to the moon but why dont you see a plume of fire if the rocket is burning hydrogen and oxygen from its own tank
There are many "facts" very wrong with your cocky "argument" in your description. Time delay from Earth to the moon- 1.3 seconds. Neil and Buzz's mission did not have a Lunar Rover to mount a camera in case he were to "abort after scratching his nose" just as you claim (they're in pressure suites, they can't reach their faces to scratch). Oh, and it's the LM, not the LEM. Nasa took "excursion" out of its name before Apollo 9. Okaydokey
@Sh0nin Maybe if the NASA fan boys started thinking LOGICALLY about things rather than with their hearts and preconceived ideas... then they can start to question the inconsistencies like the rest of us.
So come up with 1 good reason for why NASA would go to the trouble of this shot? They wouldn't even let TV studios view the best quality footage of the moon landing... and you are telling me they would go to this trouble of "choreographing" a video of the moon landing. Pull the other one.
@frankmat You've already answered that quesion yourself with the political demands of the space race. This is why you basement-dwellers can't be taken seriously, your arguments are all wrapped up in willful ignorance and selective hearing. You people remind me so much of creationists it's pathetic.
@frankmat Ever heard of "count down" when rockets start? The astronauts had to lift off at a very precise moment to catch up with the CSM in orbit. Of course the ground controllers also knew at wich speed the LEM would rise. To follow the LEM with the camera was a minor achievment, and it wasn't THAT important. If it had missed, it had missed. But it didn't. No "risk" involved.
@Sh0nin What if the astronaut was 1/2 second late in pushing the button? You'd be left with NO shot of a Lunar Module taking off.. you'd see darkness and then the LEM fly past.
I manage major engineering projects and this is called Risk Vs Reward. You simply wouldn't bother doing it because the risks of not getting it right far outweigh the reward of a useless piece of footage.
That is unless there is NO risk of course and there was a man behind this camera in a movie studio.
@Sh0nin Actually the argument is based more on the premise of "Why would they bother". Why would they go to all of that trouble of getting atrophysicists and mathmeticians to choreograph the panning of a camera upwards by sending a remote command to a camera... just so they can get an extra 1 second of completely and utterly useless footage of the LEM.
the Lem had to fire exactly to get just in front of the command module in orbit. timing had to be calculated in advance perfectly. done on an earth computer.so why did nasa forget to pan on apollo 11 ? the story i got was they forgot to pan. bullshit.
There were over 4 million people directly involved in this operation. You really think that many people could pull off a conspiracy that half a century later hasn't been officially denied yet?
@MattHughes2011 4 million people directly involved? hahaha More like maybe 10 people involved that knew what was going on. Just because someone is making bolts for the capsule in a factory doesn't mean they are "directly involved". Hell even the patsies sitting in mission control had no idea watching on their screens.
It's a ridiculous stupid argument to say that many people were involved and it can't be kept a secret.
@frankmat Uh huh. I never knew out of the billions of people in the world, all the guessing, wondering, imagining, that 10 people were capable of send a couple guys 250,000 miles away from planet Earth. That 10 people could design, engineer, develop, calculate, train and perform such an operation. I could've sworn it'd take at least a couple more...
so there are thousands of employees in lots of companies all around the world who partake in creating a product. but do u think all of those workers sit around a big table when it is decision time?! nope... only a handful at the top, and they don't care much what the rest of the worker force think, as long as it suits their agenda and it is profitable!
@frankmat But screw it.. If an uneducated kid with a laptop and a couple semi-appealing news reports by retards could figure out the government's crazy conspiracy... Who am I kidding, you must obviously be right. I mean considering that this video is illogically retarded in its accusations about a vacancy of "engine plume" (which obviously appears while he says it - 0:27 )... I'm sorry. You're right. Carry on with your uneducated life.
@frankmat Your right mate-every member involved in the construction for the Manhattan project didn`t know that they were building an atomic bomb, so i think this puts it into comparison over NASA`s workforce.
"maybe 10 people involved that knew what was going on"
- Yeah... That's a nice fairy tale, but that's absolutely not how it worked. NASA relied on experts from the industries that built its spacecraft to provide on-site advice and procedures.
The moral: if you want to perpetrate a hoax, don't have it catered.
@Rob260259 Is this idiot saying only 10 people worked in the "studio" ? LOL there was 12 astonauts! but I suppose you could not accuse hoaxtards of being intelligent!
@musicbruv Just goes to show how much these idiots know about the Apollo missions. this fox program was just laughable, I could not believe what I was hearing when I first watched it here in the UK about 4 years ago.
@MattHughes2011 One piece of proof that the moon landing was fake trumps thousands of pieces of evidence that it was real. Because if one thing is fake, it calls into question the veracity of everything else. No blast crater or dust is proof enough.
@beastshawnee It is only proof that you lack scientific understanding, why should there be a blast crater? what was pressure did the rocket engine exert on the lunar surface? and what is your point about "no dust" can you elaborate?
@musicbruv mushillbruv- It doesn't take a scientist to tell that these special effects are horrible compared to todays computer graphics. It's like watching an old b-rated dinosaur movie from the sixties...And your question why should there be a blast crater- I'll turn it back on you-why shouldn't there be a blast crater when the scientists from NASA said there would be one? This is a shill technique you guys use, try and lose the big picture by demanding details from each commenter.
You see blast craters in some artists interpretations and illustrations.
But if this was really how it was supposed to be, why didn't they add them?
Same question with stars, we have ways of knowing what stars will look like in what location for as long as planetarium have existed, so adding them wouldn't be hard if they should have been visible.
Same question with cross-hairs been "behind" objects.
@beastshawnee "Three men in the LEM"??? The "tinfoil" was only a thin protection layer on the outside of the aluminum walls, to reflect sunlight.
Why don't You try to find some REAL information, before talking about something Youclearly don't know anything about? You only risk to make a fool of Yourself.
There's A LOT of information to find. Not on Youtube, but in libraries (books, scientifical magazines and -papers) and on scientifical and technical sites on Internet.
@musicbruv # 769- call names, #7239-sound "sciencey". #5334-mock the IQ of anyone who doesnt' agree. #998-claim to personally know someone from NASA #67-Lie #67A -Lie some more #67B -Keep posting and lying.
@beastshawnee You know how it should behave? Where did you get your PhD? You must be a very gifted expert, since no other expert from among all those geniuses, all over the world, for the last 40 years agrees with you.
Bottom line, you have no idea what you're talking about and if you'd like, I'll prove it.
you are worse than a religious fanatic! You refuse to submit to a superior point of view, and yet, you cannot even prove what you are saying! How can you prove it was not automatic?
@angusword The camera was controlled by Ed Fendell in Houston. The astronauts parked the rover with the attached camera a set distance away from the LM. Fendell listened to the countdown from the LM and started his pan when he heard they were at 4 seconds. The camera panned at a known rate, and the LM ascended at a known speed. There was no transponder to help. On A15, the camera's pan didn't work, on A16, the rover was closer than expected. A17 had the best view of the launch.
LOL no exhaust plume? Because the "fuel" they used released energy on combining, it didn't have to be ignited, research Grumman's test facility in White Sands where they tested the engines. Secondly... there is no atmosphere on the moon, nothing is going to BURN. The hydrogen engines used in space, burn almost clear in our atmosphere... guess what they do in vacuum? Completely clear. That man is an idiot.
@angusword LOL here we go... more proclomation rather than investigation. Do you REALLY think they had a camera panning up automatically? Is that just what you assume or KNOW? because I can tell you... it was done manually by someone on Earth. let's stick to the facts instead of trying to justify a fantasy you believe to be reality.
How and why were there photos and vids taken from the LEM, of a floating Command Module below the LEM, and with the moon below the command Module? The CM could never be below the LEM. The LEM was supposedly landing on the moon not the Command Module. Dumb dee dumb dumb.
@IPissDownYourThroat Wow! Why do you piss down people's throats? It's so offensive, you must be a government shill. And saying the old tired lines ...was all a HOAX? Whatever. Idiot.
With the greatest respect ....... Should anyone be responding to a silly jerk with an offensive screen name like that? Time is overdue for YT to clean up their act and start filtering out the filth that gets written here and barring the IPs of the braindead children that write it.
@abolof I aint' selling nothin'. All that was bought 40 years ago. You hoaxers' are the one sellin' crap. Why you hoaxers keep calling believers shills? It's really funny as hell, beyond ironic.
Oh , it's called Aerozine.
Kaysing received his BA. in English in 49 from the USC. Those are his academic credentials. He worked for Rocketdyne chiefly as a writer and a librarian.
I have found a film of him at Rocketdyne circa 61'.
watch?v=3bS32-6jMXw I believe it is absolutely 100% real.
In the conspiracy theorist world of delusional paranoia, everyone that does not buy into their BS is "In on it" or a "paid shill for the government."
In the past, they were the weirdos standing on street corners with signs that said "The End Is Near." Now they lurk on the internet and have a bigger soapbox, but they are still just as bat shit crazy as ever.
Your argument against the time delay being accounted for is completely pathetic. Nasa performs some of the highest level of mathematics known to man. Pretty sure they're capable of navigating the 3 second time delay (that they had been having to deal with during the entirety of the trip anyway) necessary to get a tiny camera tilt. Your argument is based on pure speculation, personal bias and not even the slightest bit of fact. Learn to argue your stupid case a bit better.
Your another one that should be wearing a NASA Kevlar space suit and dumped in the core of Chenobel when it blew to see if you'ed still be singing "When you wish upon a star..." after 12 hour's jode94!
@KaOssis Went to your page, guessing you were probably like 13 years old to have come up with a comment like that. Saw you were 48. Wept a couple tears for humanity.
How embarrassing for Kaysing! Just the slightest research into hypergolic fuels shows that this is a perfect demonstration of how they appear in a vacuum. One clearly sees the initial blast of the exhaust (normal) and then it vanishes--perfectly normal. If they had shown the rest of the video, you would have been looking straight into the exhaust bell and seen a bright yellow glow. Instead, they edited that short.
Way to go, Kaysing. Spoken like a guy with no science education.
@krisdevalle A launch countdown? haha Think about what you are saying here. Would it not have been easier to just have a fixed camera rather than go to all of the trouble of timing the press of a button 3 seconds prior to lifting off.... just so they can get an extra half a second of the lander lifting into space.
That's the real question. Why did they go to all that trouble to panning the camera up remotely? The answer is they didn't.... the camera was being held by a human on earth.
@frankmat They did it because they could. If everyone at NASA was as close-minded and negative as you, they would never have gotten to the moon. But really, what do you even mean, 'all that trouble.' If by 'all that trouble' you mean, correctly anticipating the timing of the launch and pan, then I guess there must be a lot in your life that is a lot of trouble.
@krisdevalle Sorry "because they could" is not a good enough explanation. There is NO reason at all to waste time and money building a camera to take to the moon that allowed it to be remotely panned up and down from Earth on a 3 second delay via a push of the button.... all for the benefit of capturing an extra 0.5 of a second of low quality footage of the capsule lifting off the surface of the moon? Give me a break.
Do you REALLY think they planned and accomodated for that? What a joke
@frankmat Oh I'm sorry I overestimated your knowledge. This was the camera mounted on the lunar rover, which was carried on the last three missions. By putting the camera 'in the hands' of someone on Earth, this freed up the astronauts to carry out more scientific and geologic experiments. You can read more about this camera by entering 'cameras of Apollo' into google.
The rover itself was driven some distance away and the Commander walked back to the LEM before the launch.
@frankmat The WORLD was watching... of course they're going to make it look good, they want more funding to continue missions like this, it was made specifically for uneducated people.. only they didn't plan on how uneducated people really are...
and if the panning had any grounds to be fake. Do you really think NASA would be so dumb as to slip on something as trivial as a panning of the camera?
" i do not think we went far out enough to encounter the radiation belt"
Astronaut Brian Oleary said "nasa may have faked it"
Astronaut Grissom who was murdered by Nasa on Apollo 1 said to Houston, "You want to go to the moon but you can't keep communication over 3 buildings"
@nasafakedit, just show's how many people are fast asleep to reality when NASA rape's the public treasury with bullshite and strings every year... daylight robbery if you ask me!
Hahaha, let's shove you into the core of Chenobel's neuclear reactor core when it blew wearing only NASA's Kevlar space suit and see if your still singing after 12 hours Monkeyboysdontknow, hehehe!
''Hahaha, let's shove you into the core of Chenobel's neuclear reactor core when it blew wearing only NASA's Kevlar space suit''
Different types of radiations of concern. Space suits are good at blocking lower level particulate radiation, not very good for shielding x-rays or gamma rays.
Hahhaa, Kevlar might stop a colt 45 at 30 paces, but it dosn't have one ounce of radiation protection no matter whether it's on Earth or from space Monkeyboysdontknow..... your hilarious, how many cartoon channel's are you obdessed with at the moment, especially Buzz Lightyear, that must be your fav, hahahaha!
''Kevlar might stop a colt 45 at 30 paces, but it dosn't have one ounce of radiation protection no matter whether it's on Earth or from space''
Get an education before you make such scientifically untrue statements. Your ignorance of the basics of radiation is obvious .Even the layer of dead skin cells on your body will stop Alpha particle radiation from sources such as Radon gas (the soft tissue inside your lungs is where they can cause damage).
Increasing temperatures reduce the moduals of Kevlar, tensile strength and break elongation of the Kevlar yars, especially using Kevlar at r above temperatures of 149C to 177C , so can you tell us at what denier the Kevlar was in the space suits of NASA's astronauts in all their Apollo missions please, cause I know not one of them was safe in any rdaioactive atmosphere of heat ranging from 300-340C on the moon, fact, so why havn't you read fuck all about Dupont then Monkeyboy!
''I know not one of them was safe in any rdaioactive atmosphere of heat ranging from 300-340C on the moon''
Do you now?
Well. everyone that has taken a science course beyond 5th grade know their is no such thing as a ''radioactive atmosphere of heat'', or an appreciable atmosphere on the Moon at all. Also, the temperature on the Moon ranges from 107C to -153C, depending on exposure to the sun. (see part 2)
(Part 2) The outer Integrated Thermal Micrometeoroid Garment is for insulate heat and micrometeoroid, and connected to extravehicular visor, lunar overshoe. This is made by seven layered aluminized Kapton film, six layered Beta Marquisette, two layered Neoprene-coated nylon Ripstop, sandwiched between beta cloth. The knees, elbows and shoulders were protected by Chromel-R.
Lol, Universetoday say's that the moon's surface temperature (day), 107°C. Mean surface temperature (night), -153°C, Widipedia say's the day period (about 354 hours) has an average temperature of about 107 °C (225 °F), it can rise as high as 123 °C (253 °F). The night period (also 354 hours) has an average temperature of about −153 °C (−243 °F).[60] .....
.... Underground, both periods would be around -23 °C (-9 °F), and NASA say's from about -280 degrees F (-173 degrees C) at night to +260 degrees F (+127 degrees C) in the daytime. So all three of these so called intelligent sources have a varienece of temperatures on the moon, not just a little varience, but quite a lot of varience, plus, the moon has less mass than Earth, the force due to gravity at the lunar surface is only about 1/6 of that on Earth, so the moon has only 1/6 atmophere lol.
Hahaha, only protecting the joins of the body dosn't stop the rest of the human flesh from being irradiated on the moon Monkeyboysdonsn'tknow, so maybe you should go andf sit in Sellafields reactor core and you might get enough Pineal power to think about it, cause obvioulsy you havn't got enough energy for neurons in yoru empty head, hahahaha!
''cause obvioulsy you havn't got enough energy for neurons in yoru empty head,''
You should getcompensation for WHATEVER education you have supposedly recieved. You have proven to be ignorant about temperatures and their conversions, radiation and its many differences and effects, ANYTHING to do with the atmosphere (or, rather, lack there of) on the Moon, and can't seem to grasp the fundamentals of spelling, punctuation and grammar. I recommend starting your edeucation anew.
hahaha, no I havn't proven to be ignorant of the temperature of the Moon, NASA, Widepedia and Universatoday can't make their fucking minds up about the temperature of the Moone between them Monkeyboysdontknow, so your comment is unsubstantiated, and if you want tot take the piss out fo a stickey keyboard with 5 keys missing, do so, it wont bother me you having a hate campaign for a plastic piece of computer accessory, hahahaha!
It's not your keyboard that doesn't understand C from K in temperature, radiation science, or Lunar atmosphere. You are ''missing'' things far more important than a few keyboard strokes.
Oh, by the way, why don't you try reading a right hemisphere Thesaurus, cause you sound like you can only comprehend Walt Diseney cartoons with your left hemisphere Who-Dar-Winian half brained ego Monkeyboysdosn'tknow, hahahaa!
And if your talking about Electron Radiation, then that you can only reproduce on Earth, Duponts electron Radiation tests only went so far as an AGE resonant transformer at 0.5 milliamps & 2 megavolts to generate q megarad every 13.4 sec's, and that was wrapped in aluminum foil and kept over dry ice, The UV radiation on the Moon is something completely different and more damaging to Kevlar than you think Monkeyboydosn'tknow, but no astronauts were ever wrapped in aluminum and sat on dry ice!!
''The UV radiation on the Moon is something completely different and more damaging to Kevlar than you think''
Ultraviolet (UV) light IS electromagnetic radiation (not ''electron'' radiation, as that would be beta particles). And your ''proof'' that UV is so damaging to Kevlar?
This has been flagged as spam show
Another problem with the lunar "lift off".
watch?v=87t1yM90YuU
I would have loved to reply as a video reply, but that option is not available to me.
ISamuelII 1 week ago
Comment removed
ISamuelII 1 week ago
You, who uploaded this, don't even know how long a radio signal takes from Earth to Moon. And clearly don't even have heard of "count down". You are the last ignorant to be qualified to tell if the lunar landings were real or not...
YDDES 1 month ago
Very nice video.
sawa1221furu 1 month ago
paranoid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheShedlife 3 months ago
Another paranoid nutjob airing his miseducated viewpoint.
A controller at NASA sent the signal to the camera to pan upward 1.3 seconds before the LM lifted off. The signal arrived at the moon (1.3 seconds later) just as the ascent stage ignited. The camera thus followed the ascent stage upward as it took off.
It's really very simple. And somewhere, some hoax proponent is saying, "that doesn't make any sense." Sighhhhhh.
MadHighway 3 months ago
Comment removed
MadHighway 3 months ago
space is... A VACUUM !!!
its not going to look like a take off on earth with like dust floating around..
plus you can see where they landed and the American flags they put on the moon get a telescope..you morons.
Also maybe visit the lab in arizona that shoots lasers off panels we put up there to measures the distance from the earth to the moon DAILY!!
kind of a waste but yea. it would be cheaper to actually go to the moon than fake all of this, for this long... you morons..
voidenter 4 months ago
@voidenter BUT you still have gases under combustion,,, where's the plume?
ISamuelII 2 weeks ago
I find it funny you tend to ignore apollo 16. Same set up, but Ed Fendell messed up his timing. And interestingly how Apollo 15 is also ignored where the craft takes off but the camera fails to move. Please get your facts right before making wild accusations.
danschaoticmind 4 months ago
somebody please show this guy the final episode of from the earth to the moon
Jamie246100 4 months ago
This looks like one of those 50s sci fi space travel animations, where you can clearly see the objects hanging on a string. With that said this seems convincing that the whole ascent, descent, and exploration on the lunar surface was filmed here on earth. Plus how could the crew have been shielded from the harsh radiation past the van allen belt?
ItzTheDean 4 months ago
no exhaust cos its a clean fuel burn,hydrogen i think not like the big rocket which was jetfuel kerosene...........that eejit should know that
do you seriously think the russians wouldnt have found out,lol
tailendcharlie 5 months ago
In both the decent and accent bullshit stage the TVs were showing some very convincing animations at exactly the same time as this"real" event supposedly happened.Go and search for clips on the YT. to see how the criminals of NASA deceived the public.
NASACrooks 5 months ago
@NASACrooks Better go to libraries and look for scientifical sources than to relay on stupid misinterpreted clips on Youtube.
Also: Go back to school and learn som physics, optics and astronomy before You accuse thousands of preople of lying.
YDDES 4 months ago
jews suck dicks
failxtr1 5 months ago
You thicko, they listened to the countdown on Earth and panned the camera 1.3 seconds before lift off and 1.3 seconds later at the 0 count the launch button is pushed and the camera pans up at the same time, it does not take 3 seconds! and since the camera was a bit away from the ship there was a bit of leeway if it was a bit late or early, but |I would not expect a dumb ass like you to take that all in.
musicbruv 5 months ago
@Sh0nin
You are damn right. I blame the internet for conspiracy bullshit. Any asshole with a cable modem can put his non-peer reviewed, ridiculously illogical bullshit on the internet, and thousands of other assholes can collectively circle-jerk over it.
These hoax heads all think they are able to outsmart 40+ years worth of science & engineering. What a laugh.
Rob260259 6 months ago
@Rob260259 You blame the internet? that's a laugh. When I was a kid my dad was into the whole NASA.moon experience, and he told me how hot/freezing the surface of the moon was, and how low the gravity. He said the men would be able to jump 20 feet into the air. I was excited to watch the moon landings. We sat and sat, and hours of blurry pictures later, man "stepped" onto the moon. There was no bouncing. What a freakin disappointment for a kid. No bouncing at all. I had no internet.
beastshawnee 5 months ago
Then later I saw the LEM at the Smithsonian. I was so confused that I asked the guard, "now is this a model or the real thing?" It had thin sides made of gold colored tinfoil. "It's the real thing?" He said. I said, "You're telling me 3 guys could fit in there and move around and not tear through that tinfoil?" The guard just shrugged, shook his head, and acted like he didn't believe that either. "What?" I said, "This makes no sense." I didn't have internet. Then as an adult...
beastshawnee 5 months ago
@beastshawnee
"the LEM at the Smithsonian..... ... 3 guys..."
- Three..?
Rob260259 5 months ago
...as an adult I resaw the moon footage in a film after I'd worked with the play Peter Pan that some of my friends were in. I saw my friends being jerked around in practise, then they got good at it, but still there was some jerkiness. On opening day, my friend flew out over the audience, and kids believed it, even though they could see the ropes. It was a miracle! When I saw the astronauts being jerked around, all the way through, I realized they were on wires; it looked exactly the same.
beastshawnee 5 months ago
the internet is a good tool. I can share my doubts for almost free, and you can keep your paid shill job, sitting there trying to put the pieces of broken glass back together....
beastshawnee 5 months ago
@beastshawnee
The internet has not changed history. It has just given idiots a bigger soapbox to stand on.
"share my doubts"
- LOL
I think I want to share my doubts that you comprehend anything about the science & engineering that went into Apollo and the Moon landings.
Rob260259 5 months ago
@beastshawnee: "I don't understand it, so it was fake".
Rob260259 5 months ago
LOOLOLLLOLOOLLOOLLOLOOLLO
fuckallanimefans11 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LOOLOLLLOLOOLLOOLLOLO
fuckallanimefans11 6 months ago
LOOLOLL
fuckallanimefans11 6 months ago
There is a mission clock on the CM and the LM and at mission control that were all synchronised when the ship lifted off. The assent of the LM was at a pre determined time, hens how mission control knew when to point the camera up. This is a weak argument.
Edd20022 7 months ago
To respond to the video desc.:
They knew exactly when the LEM was going up. They planned this ahead of time. To get the most efficient liftoff, they had a launch window of a few seconds. They knew exactly when the liftoff was coming. Also, they knew what the launch procedures were. They knew how the ascent stage was going to move in the picture, and programmed the camera to follow it. Your argument doesn't hold water.
CubesForAKid 7 months ago
loperspest 7 months ago 2
Human trash is everywhere in the Americas
To summarize this, the White Trash from Europe settled in North America. They purchased the Black Trash of Africa to use as slaves. The Brown Trash from Portugal and Spain settled in Central and South America. And today the White Trash in America is using the Brown Trash as replacements to the Black Trash.
Are you suprised that North and South America have high levels of corruption, crime, wild behavior, dishonesty, selfishness, and mental illness?
jxcts 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Human trash is everywhere in the Americas
To summarize this, the White Trash from Europe settled in North America. They purchased the Black Trash of Africa to use as slaves. The Brown Trash from Portugal and Spain settled in Central and South America. And today the White Trash in America is using the Brown Trash as replacements to the Black Trash.
Are you suprised that North and South America have high levels of corruption, crime, wild behavior, dishonesty, selfishness, and mental illness?
jxcts 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Human trash is everywhere in the Americas
To summarize this, the White Trash from Europe settled in North America. They purchased the Black Trash of Africa to use as slaves. The Brown Trash from Portugal and Spain settled in Central and South America. And today the White Trash in America is using the Brown Trash as replacements to the Black Trash.
Are you suprised that North and South America have high levels of corruption, crime, wild behavior, dishonesty, selfishness, and mental illness?
jxcts 7 months ago
Human trash is everywhere in the Americas
To summarize this, the White Trash from Europe settled in North America. They purchased the Black Trash of Africa to use as slaves. The Brown Trash from Portugal and Spain settled in Central and South America. And today the White Trash in America is using the Brown Trash as replacements to the Black Trash.
Are you suprised that North and South America have high levels of corruption, crime, wild behavior, dishonesty, selfishness, and mental illness?
jxcts 7 months ago
000000
tyaci0l0 7 months ago
00000
tyaci0l0 7 months ago
0000
tyaci0l0 7 months ago
000
tyaci0l0 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
olollloloololloloolloollo
googelx0 7 months ago
olollloloolol
googelx0 7 months ago
ololllolo
googelx0 7 months ago
ollie williams reports.
Chrona876 7 months ago
I will fight these morons to my dying breath.
You don't see an exhaust plume because the launch took place in a rock-hard vacuum. If there is nothing to disturb then nothing will be disturbed.
Except of course for your tiny, micro-encephalic brain.
anodeenzyme 7 months ago
@anodeenzyme i agree with and the obviously went to the moon but why dont you see a plume of fire if the rocket is burning hydrogen and oxygen from its own tank
EddieHitler1000 7 months ago
what the hell dose this have to do with religion this is dumb
xxmangagirlxx 8 months ago
There are many "facts" very wrong with your cocky "argument" in your description. Time delay from Earth to the moon- 1.3 seconds. Neil and Buzz's mission did not have a Lunar Rover to mount a camera in case he were to "abort after scratching his nose" just as you claim (they're in pressure suites, they can't reach their faces to scratch). Oh, and it's the LM, not the LEM. Nasa took "excursion" out of its name before Apollo 9. Okaydokey
krogen42hull198 8 months ago
What an idiotic premise. That old guy really needs to lay off the sauce.
EUROTRASHSPAMMER 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ollox333xx33xx33x3x3x3x4c44c44c4c4c4c
boostme405 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ollox333xx33xx33x3x3x3x4c44c4
boostme405 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ollox333xx33xx33x3x3x3x4c4
boostme405 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ollox333xx33xx33x3x3x3x
boostme405 9 months ago
ollox333xx33xx3
boostme405 9 months ago
ollox333xx3
boostme405 9 months ago
ollox33
boostme405 9 months ago
ollo
boostme405 9 months ago
FAKE MOON MOVIES
nasafakeshit 9 months ago
No.. isn't it possible since there is no air or atmosphere that exhaust dissipates almost instantly??
mohammeddavis 10 months ago
@Sh0nin Maybe if the NASA fan boys started thinking LOGICALLY about things rather than with their hearts and preconceived ideas... then they can start to question the inconsistencies like the rest of us.
So come up with 1 good reason for why NASA would go to the trouble of this shot? They wouldn't even let TV studios view the best quality footage of the moon landing... and you are telling me they would go to this trouble of "choreographing" a video of the moon landing. Pull the other one.
frankmat 10 months ago
@frankmat You've already answered that quesion yourself with the political demands of the space race. This is why you basement-dwellers can't be taken seriously, your arguments are all wrapped up in willful ignorance and selective hearing. You people remind me so much of creationists it's pathetic.
Sh0nin 10 months ago
@frankmat
You should try common sense and engineering.
Rob260259 5 months ago
@frankmat Ever heard of "count down" when rockets start? The astronauts had to lift off at a very precise moment to catch up with the CSM in orbit. Of course the ground controllers also knew at wich speed the LEM would rise. To follow the LEM with the camera was a minor achievment, and it wasn't THAT important. If it had missed, it had missed. But it didn't. No "risk" involved.
YDDES 4 months ago
@Sh0nin What if the astronaut was 1/2 second late in pushing the button? You'd be left with NO shot of a Lunar Module taking off.. you'd see darkness and then the LEM fly past.
I manage major engineering projects and this is called Risk Vs Reward. You simply wouldn't bother doing it because the risks of not getting it right far outweigh the reward of a useless piece of footage.
That is unless there is NO risk of course and there was a man behind this camera in a movie studio.
frankmat 10 months ago
@Sh0nin Actually the argument is based more on the premise of "Why would they bother". Why would they go to all of that trouble of getting atrophysicists and mathmeticians to choreograph the panning of a camera upwards by sending a remote command to a camera... just so they can get an extra 1 second of completely and utterly useless footage of the LEM.
frankmat 10 months ago
the Lem had to fire exactly to get just in front of the command module in orbit. timing had to be calculated in advance perfectly. done on an earth computer.so why did nasa forget to pan on apollo 11 ? the story i got was they forgot to pan. bullshit.
datzfast 11 months ago
what a lot of old rubbish of course we went to the moon ffs...get real buddy
earthvisitor3 11 months ago
you should see my exhaust plume its incredible
endracismguy 11 months ago
no plume? what do you call the blast that came from it?
tonycdrive 11 months ago
Are people still debating this?...
There were over 4 million people directly involved in this operation. You really think that many people could pull off a conspiracy that half a century later hasn't been officially denied yet?
MattHughes2011 1 year ago 4
@MattHughes2011 4 million people directly involved? hahaha More like maybe 10 people involved that knew what was going on. Just because someone is making bolts for the capsule in a factory doesn't mean they are "directly involved". Hell even the patsies sitting in mission control had no idea watching on their screens.
It's a ridiculous stupid argument to say that many people were involved and it can't be kept a secret.
frankmat 1 year ago
@frankmat Uh huh. I never knew out of the billions of people in the world, all the guessing, wondering, imagining, that 10 people were capable of send a couple guys 250,000 miles away from planet Earth. That 10 people could design, engineer, develop, calculate, train and perform such an operation. I could've sworn it'd take at least a couple more...
MattHughes2011 1 year ago
@MattHughes2011
Yeah it took thousands as a matter of fact what queer told you only 10 people were involved in doing it?
TheJomogogo 11 months ago
@TheJomogogo The guy @frankmat who posted this fucking video.. He's a douchebag.
MattHughes2011 11 months ago
@TheJomogogo moronic statement by any standard.
so there are thousands of employees in lots of companies all around the world who partake in creating a product. but do u think all of those workers sit around a big table when it is decision time?! nope... only a handful at the top, and they don't care much what the rest of the worker force think, as long as it suits their agenda and it is profitable!
CT2507 11 months ago
@frankmat But screw it.. If an uneducated kid with a laptop and a couple semi-appealing news reports by retards could figure out the government's crazy conspiracy... Who am I kidding, you must obviously be right. I mean considering that this video is illogically retarded in its accusations about a vacancy of "engine plume" (which obviously appears while he says it - 0:27 )... I'm sorry. You're right. Carry on with your uneducated life.
Who knew...
MattHughes2011 1 year ago
@frankmat Your right mate-every member involved in the construction for the Manhattan project didn`t know that they were building an atomic bomb, so i think this puts it into comparison over NASA`s workforce.
simposayerman 11 months ago
@frankmat
"maybe 10 people involved that knew what was going on"
- Yeah... That's a nice fairy tale, but that's absolutely not how it worked. NASA relied on experts from the industries that built its spacecraft to provide on-site advice and procedures.
The moral: if you want to perpetrate a hoax, don't have it catered.
Rob260259 5 months ago
@Rob260259 Is this idiot saying only 10 people worked in the "studio" ? LOL there was 12 astonauts! but I suppose you could not accuse hoaxtards of being intelligent!
musicbruv 5 months ago
@musicbruv
Yep... another hoax head is talking about 3 (three) crewmembers for the LM...
I'm quickly reaching the point that most of these fools can't be taken seriously.
Rob260259 5 months ago
@musicbruv Just goes to show how much these idiots know about the Apollo missions. this fox program was just laughable, I could not believe what I was hearing when I first watched it here in the UK about 4 years ago.
musicbruv 5 months ago
@MattHughes2011 4 million people directly involved!? hahaha...
thats a new one. never heard that one before.
tell me, are u impressed with big numbers. do u get aroused with words like "millions" and "billions"?? :))
how about trillions and gazillions"? hehe..
CT2507 11 months ago
@MattHughes2011 One piece of proof that the moon landing was fake trumps thousands of pieces of evidence that it was real. Because if one thing is fake, it calls into question the veracity of everything else. No blast crater or dust is proof enough.
beastshawnee 5 months ago
@beastshawnee It is only proof that you lack scientific understanding, why should there be a blast crater? what was pressure did the rocket engine exert on the lunar surface? and what is your point about "no dust" can you elaborate?
musicbruv 5 months ago
@musicbruv mushillbruv- It doesn't take a scientist to tell that these special effects are horrible compared to todays computer graphics. It's like watching an old b-rated dinosaur movie from the sixties...And your question why should there be a blast crater- I'll turn it back on you-why shouldn't there be a blast crater when the scientists from NASA said there would be one? This is a shill technique you guys use, try and lose the big picture by demanding details from each commenter.
beastshawnee 5 months ago
@beastshawnee
You see blast craters in some artists interpretations and illustrations.
But if this was really how it was supposed to be, why didn't they add them?
Same question with stars, we have ways of knowing what stars will look like in what location for as long as planetarium have existed, so adding them wouldn't be hard if they should have been visible.
Same question with cross-hairs been "behind" objects.
Why not take pictures without cross-hairs?
Or add them last during composting?
loperspest 5 months ago
@beastshawnee "Three men in the LEM"??? The "tinfoil" was only a thin protection layer on the outside of the aluminum walls, to reflect sunlight.
Why don't You try to find some REAL information, before talking about something Youclearly don't know anything about? You only risk to make a fool of Yourself.
There's A LOT of information to find. Not on Youtube, but in libraries (books, scientifical magazines and -papers) and on scientifical and technical sites on Internet.
Search! Good luck!
YDDES 5 months ago
@musicbruv # 769- call names, #7239-sound "sciencey". #5334-mock the IQ of anyone who doesnt' agree. #998-claim to personally know someone from NASA #67-Lie #67A -Lie some more #67B -Keep posting and lying.
beastshawnee 5 months ago
@beastshawnee I take it that avoiding the question means you dont know the answer.
musicbruv 5 months ago
@musicbruv You can call it avoiding the answers, I can call it refusing to play your idiotic games.
beastshawnee 5 months ago
@musicbruv You know the answers already anyway.
beastshawnee 5 months ago
@musicbruv You just pretend you don't.
beastshawnee 5 months ago
@beastshawnee Thank you for confirming your lack knowledge.
musicbruv 5 months ago
@beastshawnee
Ghee.. I guess you do Illuminati, Freemasons, Chemtrails, JFK, 9/11 and NWO, too?
Rob260259 5 months ago
@beastshawnee
And with Apollo, NO THING is fake. See? All evidence is 100% real. Not one piece faked.
MadHighway 3 months ago
Comment removed
MattHughes2011 1 year ago
First of all, Kaysing is an ignorant, America-hating, paranopid psychotic crackpot. He is not an engineer and he has no idea what he is talking about.
I made a video about this "plume" in response to Jarrah White, who parrots every stupid claim this idiot ever made.
watch?v=SAfJkYTkQZk
There IS a plume, but it is very brief as it takes a second for the burn to stabilize.
Second, no further exhaust should be visible. Billowing flames and smoke are only visible in the atmosphere.
Astrobrant2 1 year ago
The thing just jerks up, and not even in a steady way, it sways back and forth a bit, which it would never do if it blasted off.
beastshawnee 1 year ago
@beastshawnee You know how it should behave? Where did you get your PhD? You must be a very gifted expert, since no other expert from among all those geniuses, all over the world, for the last 40 years agrees with you.
Bottom line, you have no idea what you're talking about and if you'd like, I'll prove it.
Astrobrant2 1 year ago
@stalkervision
you are worse than a religious fanatic! You refuse to submit to a superior point of view, and yet, you cannot even prove what you are saying! How can you prove it was not automatic?
angusword 1 year ago
@angusword The camera was controlled by Ed Fendell in Houston. The astronauts parked the rover with the attached camera a set distance away from the LM. Fendell listened to the countdown from the LM and started his pan when he heard they were at 4 seconds. The camera panned at a known rate, and the LM ascended at a known speed. There was no transponder to help. On A15, the camera's pan didn't work, on A16, the rover was closer than expected. A17 had the best view of the launch.
roamingcroat 1 year ago
lol, conspiracy...;/
sebastiansz 1 year ago
LOL no exhaust plume? Because the "fuel" they used released energy on combining, it didn't have to be ignited, research Grumman's test facility in White Sands where they tested the engines. Secondly... there is no atmosphere on the moon, nothing is going to BURN. The hydrogen engines used in space, burn almost clear in our atmosphere... guess what they do in vacuum? Completely clear. That man is an idiot.
aerowenn 1 year ago 3
@aerowenn what happened to the crater from the toy LM landing?
Did nasa forget to edit it in
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@2nasafakedit Lol which one, we went to the moon several times?
aerowenn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@aerowenn we FAKED IT several times
TV Moon Landing is a Hoax
Nasa is a crock of shit
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@nasafakedit did it EVER occur to you that the camera was panning up AUTOMATICALLY? LIke a COMPUTER?
It would be easy to put a transponder into the LEM and then have the camera track the transponder's location.
angusword 1 year ago
@angusword LOL here we go... more proclomation rather than investigation. Do you REALLY think they had a camera panning up automatically? Is that just what you assume or KNOW? because I can tell you... it was done manually by someone on Earth. let's stick to the facts instead of trying to justify a fantasy you believe to be reality.
frankmat 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@frankmat prove it bitch
angusword 1 year ago
@frankmat and learn to spell while you're at it...
angusword 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@frankmat
HELLO AGAIN I SAY!
How and why were there photos and vids taken from the LEM, of a floating Command Module below the LEM, and with the moon below the command Module? The CM could never be below the LEM. The LEM was supposedly landing on the moon not the Command Module. Dumb dee dumb dumb.
EGMAG 1 year ago
@frankmat ~ Did you know that WW2 was all a HOAX? It never happened!
IPissDownYourThroat 1 year ago
@IPissDownYourThroat Wow! Why do you piss down people's throats? It's so offensive, you must be a government shill. And saying the old tired lines ...was all a HOAX? Whatever. Idiot.
beastshawnee 1 year ago
@beastshawnee
With the greatest respect ....... Should anyone be responding to a silly jerk with an offensive screen name like that? Time is overdue for YT to clean up their act and start filtering out the filth that gets written here and barring the IPs of the braindead children that write it.
TheSpiritof1969 1 year ago
@TheSpiritof1969 starting wif U lol
endracismguy 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@angusword did it EVER occur to you that you are a brainwashed human idiot?
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
Aaaahhh Yeah......There's no air up there to be burnt Bill to make exhaust plume.
You silly shilly you......Yet another feeble attempt to discredit the landings. It's like watching a drowning guy clutching for straw.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
@Tweekerhead
the fuel contains it's own oxygen or else it would not ignite at all.
shilly silly YOU!
abolof 1 year ago
@abolof I aint' selling nothin'. All that was bought 40 years ago. You hoaxers' are the one sellin' crap. Why you hoaxers keep calling believers shills? It's really funny as hell, beyond ironic.
Oh , it's called Aerozine.
Kaysing received his BA. in English in 49 from the USC. Those are his academic credentials. He worked for Rocketdyne chiefly as a writer and a librarian.
I have found a film of him at Rocketdyne circa 61'.
watch?v=3bS32-6jMXw I believe it is absolutely 100% real.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the conspiracy theorist world of delusional paranoia, everyone that does not buy into their BS is "In on it" or a "paid shill for the government."
In the past, they were the weirdos standing on street corners with signs that said "The End Is Near." Now they lurk on the internet and have a bigger soapbox, but they are still just as bat shit crazy as ever.
Synthetrix 1 year ago 16
Your argument against the time delay being accounted for is completely pathetic. Nasa performs some of the highest level of mathematics known to man. Pretty sure they're capable of navigating the 3 second time delay (that they had been having to deal with during the entirety of the trip anyway) necessary to get a tiny camera tilt. Your argument is based on pure speculation, personal bias and not even the slightest bit of fact. Learn to argue your stupid case a bit better.
jode94 1 year ago
Your another one that should be wearing a NASA Kevlar space suit and dumped in the core of Chenobel when it blew to see if you'ed still be singing "When you wish upon a star..." after 12 hour's jode94!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis Went to your page, guessing you were probably like 13 years old to have come up with a comment like that. Saw you were 48. Wept a couple tears for humanity.
jode94 1 year ago
what a ride what a ride to disney studios
wen790 1 year ago
No exhaust plume?? No shit, There is no exhaust plume when I use my stove either,but I assure you there is combustion.
MunchyMcNipples 1 year ago
That's because you have an electric oven MunchyMcNipples, hehehe!
KaOssis 1 year ago
Wow people are so ignorant sometimes.
MrRobinsonTv 1 year ago
How embarrassing for Kaysing! Just the slightest research into hypergolic fuels shows that this is a perfect demonstration of how they appear in a vacuum. One clearly sees the initial blast of the exhaust (normal) and then it vanishes--perfectly normal. If they had shown the rest of the video, you would have been looking straight into the exhaust bell and seen a bright yellow glow. Instead, they edited that short.
Way to go, Kaysing. Spoken like a guy with no science education.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
Oh hey genius, ever heard of a launch countdown? That pretty much fixes all your objections.
How the hell could you not figure this out?
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle A launch countdown? haha Think about what you are saying here. Would it not have been easier to just have a fixed camera rather than go to all of the trouble of timing the press of a button 3 seconds prior to lifting off.... just so they can get an extra half a second of the lander lifting into space.
That's the real question. Why did they go to all that trouble to panning the camera up remotely? The answer is they didn't.... the camera was being held by a human on earth.
frankmat 1 year ago
@frankmat They did it because they could. If everyone at NASA was as close-minded and negative as you, they would never have gotten to the moon. But really, what do you even mean, 'all that trouble.' If by 'all that trouble' you mean, correctly anticipating the timing of the launch and pan, then I guess there must be a lot in your life that is a lot of trouble.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle Sorry "because they could" is not a good enough explanation. There is NO reason at all to waste time and money building a camera to take to the moon that allowed it to be remotely panned up and down from Earth on a 3 second delay via a push of the button.... all for the benefit of capturing an extra 0.5 of a second of low quality footage of the capsule lifting off the surface of the moon? Give me a break.
Do you REALLY think they planned and accomodated for that? What a joke
frankmat 1 year ago
@frankmat Oh I'm sorry I overestimated your knowledge. This was the camera mounted on the lunar rover, which was carried on the last three missions. By putting the camera 'in the hands' of someone on Earth, this freed up the astronauts to carry out more scientific and geologic experiments. You can read more about this camera by entering 'cameras of Apollo' into google.
The rover itself was driven some distance away and the Commander walked back to the LEM before the launch.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@frankmat do you know kris the genuine moron?
He is a shill spamming absolute trash on all the nasa nazi fake moon videos
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
@frankmat The WORLD was watching... of course they're going to make it look good, they want more funding to continue missions like this, it was made specifically for uneducated people.. only they didn't plan on how uneducated people really are...
and if the panning had any grounds to be fake. Do you really think NASA would be so dumb as to slip on something as trivial as a panning of the camera?
laser20pack 1 year ago
HOAX OF THE CENTURY
6 Faked moonlandings
Apollo 12 astronaut alan bean said
" i do not think we went far out enough to encounter the radiation belt"
Astronaut Brian Oleary said "nasa may have faked it"
Astronaut Grissom who was murdered by Nasa on Apollo 1 said to Houston, "You want to go to the moon but you can't keep communication over 3 buildings"
nasafakedit 1 year ago
NASA FAKE EVERYTHING
except
Lift Off
nasafakedit 1 year ago
Astronauts on the Fake Apollo Missions
were drugged out of their minds
Art Bell to Astronaut Mitchell,,, "What did it feel like to walk on the moon? What were you feeling emotionally?
Mitchell,,,, " I can't remember"
Interview with astronaut Alan Bean apollo 12
Interviewer,,, "Did you feel the ill effects from the Van Allen Radiation belt? "
Alan Bean,,, " I'm not sure we went far out enough to encounter the Radiation belts, i don't know the distance to the radiation belt"
nasafakedit 1 year ago 2
@nasafakedit LOL great comments-I CAN'T REMEMBER. lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@nasafakedit You need to adjust your brain slightly to believe this footage. Like 9/11.
RevengeofShinobi1 1 year ago
@nasafakedit :18 watch the fake fireworks FLY DIRECTLY UP THE CABLE on the left side of that TEAKETTLE. lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@nasafakedit, just show's how many people are fast asleep to reality when NASA rape's the public treasury with bullshite and strings every year... daylight robbery if you ask me!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis
''just show's how many people are fast asleep to reality''
Naw, it ACTUALLY only shows how many people are really, really scientificaly ignorant. Like you and every MHB.
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
Hahaha, let's shove you into the core of Chenobel's neuclear reactor core when it blew wearing only NASA's Kevlar space suit and see if your still singing after 12 hours Monkeyboysdontknow, hehehe!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis
''Hahaha, let's shove you into the core of Chenobel's neuclear reactor core when it blew wearing only NASA's Kevlar space suit''
Different types of radiations of concern. Space suits are good at blocking lower level particulate radiation, not very good for shielding x-rays or gamma rays.
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
Hahhaa, Kevlar might stop a colt 45 at 30 paces, but it dosn't have one ounce of radiation protection no matter whether it's on Earth or from space Monkeyboysdontknow..... your hilarious, how many cartoon channel's are you obdessed with at the moment, especially Buzz Lightyear, that must be your fav, hahahaha!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis
''Kevlar might stop a colt 45 at 30 paces, but it dosn't have one ounce of radiation protection no matter whether it's on Earth or from space''
Get an education before you make such scientifically untrue statements. Your ignorance of the basics of radiation is obvious .Even the layer of dead skin cells on your body will stop Alpha particle radiation from sources such as Radon gas (the soft tissue inside your lungs is where they can cause damage).
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
Increasing temperatures reduce the moduals of Kevlar, tensile strength and break elongation of the Kevlar yars, especially using Kevlar at r above temperatures of 149C to 177C , so can you tell us at what denier the Kevlar was in the space suits of NASA's astronauts in all their Apollo missions please, cause I know not one of them was safe in any rdaioactive atmosphere of heat ranging from 300-340C on the moon, fact, so why havn't you read fuck all about Dupont then Monkeyboy!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis
''I know not one of them was safe in any rdaioactive atmosphere of heat ranging from 300-340C on the moon''
Do you now?
Well. everyone that has taken a science course beyond 5th grade know their is no such thing as a ''radioactive atmosphere of heat'', or an appreciable atmosphere on the Moon at all. Also, the temperature on the Moon ranges from 107C to -153C, depending on exposure to the sun. (see part 2)
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
(Part 2) The outer Integrated Thermal Micrometeoroid Garment is for insulate heat and micrometeoroid, and connected to extravehicular visor, lunar overshoe. This is made by seven layered aluminized Kapton film, six layered Beta Marquisette, two layered Neoprene-coated nylon Ripstop, sandwiched between beta cloth. The knees, elbows and shoulders were protected by Chromel-R.
It looks like YOU didn't do ANY homework.
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
Lol, Universetoday say's that the moon's surface temperature (day), 107°C. Mean surface temperature (night), -153°C, Widipedia say's the day period (about 354 hours) has an average temperature of about 107 °C (225 °F), it can rise as high as 123 °C (253 °F). The night period (also 354 hours) has an average temperature of about −153 °C (−243 °F).[60] .....
KaOssis 1 year ago
.... Underground, both periods would be around -23 °C (-9 °F), and NASA say's from about -280 degrees F (-173 degrees C) at night to +260 degrees F (+127 degrees C) in the daytime. So all three of these so called intelligent sources have a varienece of temperatures on the moon, not just a little varience, but quite a lot of varience, plus, the moon has less mass than Earth, the force due to gravity at the lunar surface is only about 1/6 of that on Earth, so the moon has only 1/6 atmophere lol.
KaOssis 1 year ago
Hahaha, only protecting the joins of the body dosn't stop the rest of the human flesh from being irradiated on the moon Monkeyboysdonsn'tknow, so maybe you should go andf sit in Sellafields reactor core and you might get enough Pineal power to think about it, cause obvioulsy you havn't got enough energy for neurons in yoru empty head, hahahaha!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis the landing on the moon was real, no conspiracy!
MissCherrySkull 1 year ago
@KaOssis
''cause obvioulsy you havn't got enough energy for neurons in yoru empty head,''
You should getcompensation for WHATEVER education you have supposedly recieved. You have proven to be ignorant about temperatures and their conversions, radiation and its many differences and effects, ANYTHING to do with the atmosphere (or, rather, lack there of) on the Moon, and can't seem to grasp the fundamentals of spelling, punctuation and grammar. I recommend starting your edeucation anew.
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
hahaha, no I havn't proven to be ignorant of the temperature of the Moon, NASA, Widepedia and Universatoday can't make their fucking minds up about the temperature of the Moone between them Monkeyboysdontknow, so your comment is unsubstantiated, and if you want tot take the piss out fo a stickey keyboard with 5 keys missing, do so, it wont bother me you having a hate campaign for a plastic piece of computer accessory, hahahaha!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis
It's not your keyboard that doesn't understand C from K in temperature, radiation science, or Lunar atmosphere. You are ''missing'' things far more important than a few keyboard strokes.
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
Your missing a right hemisphere of your brain Monkeyboysdosn'rknowSFA!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis
YOU don't know!
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
Monkeyboysdosn'tknowSFA, hehehee!
KaOssis 1 year ago
@KaOssis
YOU don't know!
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
I know MonkeyboysdontknowSFA, hehehe!
KaOssis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KaOssis
YOU don't know!
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
Oh, by the way, why don't you try reading a right hemisphere Thesaurus, cause you sound like you can only comprehend Walt Diseney cartoons with your left hemisphere Who-Dar-Winian half brained ego Monkeyboysdosn'tknow, hahahaa!
KaOssis 1 year ago
And if your talking about Electron Radiation, then that you can only reproduce on Earth, Duponts electron Radiation tests only went so far as an AGE resonant transformer at 0.5 milliamps & 2 megavolts to generate q megarad every 13.4 sec's, and that was wrapped in aluminum foil and kept over dry ice, The UV radiation on the Moon is something completely different and more damaging to Kevlar than you think Monkeyboydosn'tknow, but no astronauts were ever wrapped in aluminum and sat on dry ice!!
KaOssis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KaOssis
''The UV radiation on the Moon is something completely different and more damaging to Kevlar than you think''
Ultraviolet (UV) light IS electromagnetic radiation (not ''electron'' radiation, as that would be beta particles). And your ''proof'' that UV is so damaging to Kevlar?
Monkeyboysdontknow 1 year ago
@nasafakedit Ah, so