@MrEdobob the robots shown here are very very far from bacteria. In fact, when anyone wants to make a nanorobot, its far easier to take a bacteria and modify it... its already the perfect nanomachine. But this is not something i know how to do :)...
@eviltheory 2 years later - SORRY ... The bulk modulus does not necessarily decrease. Single walled carbon nanotubes have perfect structure and very high modulus. Depending on the material and the fabrication process, there can be many defects in the structure (nanotube made with chemical vapor deposition are often defected) and there can also be surface effects - the surface becoming a bigger and bigger part of the structure, as the structure is reduced in size...
well... they are multiwalled nanotubes at the core, but have been coated (not by purpose) by an amorphous layer during the growth process - it happens when the etching process that cleans up the amorphous graphite does not work well enough.
we dont know yet what it will do for us. In the nanoworld (with respect to moving and building things) we are roughly on the stage of the prehistoric humans, who are just starting to discover that hands can be used for anythings than picking up fruits. We are starting to build small instruments, that are really useful - but whether it will stay like "playing around" or will develop into a "nanocivilisation" - there is no way to tell at this point. But we are trying
Nanotechnology is mainstream. Thing is, people who sells succesful stuff, dont need the brand "nanotechnology" - people buy computers, LEDs, harddisks, paing, sunscreen and a ton of other products, because they work and are cheap, not because they are nano. It has already happened, and it has not been such a big deal ... but try to compare a modern pocket TByte harddisk at 100 euro with state of art of storage 15 years ago. Thats mainstream nanotechnology.
the smallest tweezers in the world, trying to break off carbon nanotubes (strong as diamont, small as virus), which have been grown on a silicon surface just as small plants.
So how would those nano-stuff be different with bacterias if they had gain more complexity?
MrEdobob 7 months ago
@MrEdobob the robots shown here are very very far from bacteria. In fact, when anyone wants to make a nanorobot, its far easier to take a bacteria and modify it... its already the perfect nanomachine. But this is not something i know how to do :)...
NanoClips 2 months ago
cool video. Have you tried different material systems like GaAs/InP wires? What is the reason that the bulk modulus decrease at the nanoscale?
eviltheory 2 years ago
@eviltheory 2 years later - SORRY ... The bulk modulus does not necessarily decrease. Single walled carbon nanotubes have perfect structure and very high modulus. Depending on the material and the fabrication process, there can be many defects in the structure (nanotube made with chemical vapor deposition are often defected) and there can also be surface effects - the surface becoming a bigger and bigger part of the structure, as the structure is reduced in size...
NanoClips 2 months ago
that's a silicon/carbon nanotube i think...
pitviper12345 3 years ago
that's a silicon/carbon nanotube i think...
pitviper12345 3 years ago
Oh man, I find all of this SO exciting.. I am Totally subscribing to you NanoClips!
Peace
p.s. Nanotechnology is the Future!
Tattoo1377 3 years ago
Nice video. The tubes are nicely grown in a regular pattern. Are they nanotubes or nanofibers?
flutist001 4 years ago
well... they are multiwalled nanotubes at the core, but have been coated (not by purpose) by an amorphous layer during the growth process - it happens when the etching process that cleans up the amorphous graphite does not work well enough.
NanoClips 4 years ago
we dont know yet what it will do for us. In the nanoworld (with respect to moving and building things) we are roughly on the stage of the prehistoric humans, who are just starting to discover that hands can be used for anythings than picking up fruits. We are starting to build small instruments, that are really useful - but whether it will stay like "playing around" or will develop into a "nanocivilisation" - there is no way to tell at this point. But we are trying
NanoClips 4 years ago
Ray Kurzweil predicts that nanotechnology will become mainstream before the end of the second decade. Would you agree?
vman456 2 years ago
Nanotechnology is mainstream. Thing is, people who sells succesful stuff, dont need the brand "nanotechnology" - people buy computers, LEDs, harddisks, paing, sunscreen and a ton of other products, because they work and are cheap, not because they are nano. It has already happened, and it has not been such a big deal ... but try to compare a modern pocket TByte harddisk at 100 euro with state of art of storage 15 years ago. Thats mainstream nanotechnology.
NanoClips 2 years ago
Hopefully very soon nano scale robots could be created. It could revolutionize medicine (among other things of course).
Hopefully one day we can completely cure cancer and other deadly diseases.
Jenfucius 2 years ago 2
@Jenfucius It's not going to happen very soon at all, unfortunately.
EnhanceTheTruth 4 months ago
so what can you do with this technology?
i am really a noob in this nanotube thing
soepvorkje 4 years ago
we dont know quite yet. But we are hoping to realise an assembly line very soon - during the next year or so.
NanoClips 4 years ago
maybe they can make stronger and lighter materials ?
soepvorkje 3 years ago
Dude i'm high...wtf is that.
nano weed...fuck yeah
Tiny nano weeds wedizzie.
kaneda13 4 years ago
well, actually, they are not the smallest. Sorry. But they seem to work :)
NanoClips 4 years ago
the smallest tweezers in the world, trying to break off carbon nanotubes (strong as diamont, small as virus), which have been grown on a silicon surface just as small plants.
The next thing in nanorobotics :)
NanoClips 4 years ago
wow cool!!!
soepvorkje 3 years ago
.... WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT??????
dt28469 4 years ago