Added: 5 years ago
From: A930
Views: 53,981
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (100)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Gotta love Porsche's haha, i have a ls2 powered g body and my dad handed me the keys to his 80 Weissach, i laughed like a school girl all the way to fifth gear

  • Is this car stock?

  • @Pendemic no. 930's didn't come with more than 330Hp at the crank i believe

  • the kings of midturn oversteer battle it out, and not one tire chirps? 

  • However, every Porsche 930 is Turbo. So saying a 930 Turbo is a useless repetition.

  • 930 Turbo is much better with 3299cc, 420 Breakhorsepower than 300.

  • It was nice of the Vette driver to give the "VW Beetle on steroids" such an amazing view of Vette ass.

  • @IcanCuNowcanUCme

    Ah yes...but too bad they were broke ass Vettes at Le Mans....sad when steriod VW beats a Corvette....

  • a good look at a Corvette's tail lights

  • No corvette will ever be as cool as a 930

  • @TheLordofShell Porsche is the most OVERRATED brand on earth. I would sooner have one ZR1 than every porsche combined.

  • @IcanCuNowcanUCme

    You will have neither

    Enjoy your Hyundai 

  • Spoken like someone who has neither ride, but an opinion.

    Vette's a great blue-collar machine to be seen in. but it's not a the benchmark.

  • @RStarga

    It is very much a benchmark.

  • @IcanCuNowcanUCme

    You young kid don't know what you are talking about. I hope for you, one day, to be able to drive a Porsche. You will understand everything.

    A 964 Turbo, 997 C4S, 996 Boxster S Turbo, Cayenne GTS owner.

  • @PhilMcCartney I'm a mechanical engineer, so I value my own opinion on automotive engineering. However, I do not value your words.

  • Comment removed

  • Being a Mechanical Engineer doesn't mean you know anything about Porsche or german engineering. My words aren't meant to be valuable. You just can't explain with words the feeling, the difference between american car and german car.

    On the otherside being mechanical engineer doesn't mean you have the money to drive of those cars. I drove (on a track) the ZR1 of a friend of mine and I wasn't impress. It's a good car, lot of power, but my 18 years old 964 was even if not better

  • @TheLordofShell that's your opinion. Some of the new Vettes running around San Diego have shown my 930 their tailights, but they have 30 years worth of technology on my car.

  • 514 HP and 500 LB FT TQ and 2650 lbs for the 930 here.

  • Mike i will try to clear this up the 930 debut was at the paris auto show oct 74 the car went into production and was sold to the public in spring 75 all the other items in my post or correct as well and those are the facts acording to Porsche factory

  • I have owned many Corvette's my favorite being a 65. Fun fun cars. I have switched over to 930's with twin plug mods. As a whole the Vette have bottom end grunt and the Porsche 60 to 120mph slam. Both great cars, but the porsche is more agile - even though either can be modded to fly. A modded 930 has so much torque that a pair of 345's on rear cant keep it grounded when dropping clutch to third at 100mph. fast fast fast.

  • Too bad this video turned into an "I'm better than you" debate. Seriously guys, who cares what's faster, each has their own distinct merits. It's a bit awkward though to compare a new car to one that debuted in 1974.

    I love those 930 turbos. I've never been in a turbocharged car that builds boost as violently or frenetically as that car does. Plus, if you drive that car fast around a bend and live, it's very satisfying.

    Never driven a Z06, I'm sure they'd be quite fun too.

  • first 930 was in 1975 260 hp top speed 153 mph europe usa 1976 3.0L exhaust gas turbo no intercooler

    in 1978 the 3.3 L 300 hp 162 mph added intercooler was introduced I have owned both currently own a 1977 930 all with four speed trans until the last year 1989 then 5 speed trans these are facts jack

  • Just to clear up the facts there Jack... '74 was the first year the 930 as we know it was produced. The 3.3 Turbo became available in the states in 1986. The '88 model ( which I proudly own) was the last production year with the 4 speed tranny. Porsche produced a car for 6 months in '89 under the internal designation of 930, but it wasn't a true 930. They tried out the new 5 speed tranny for the carrera 2 in it. rare model, but the last year of the true 930 is 1988!

  • I will take my "pain in the ass to get into first gear" 4 speed every day of the week! What an exciting car this is to drive!!

  • 78-79 US 930's were 3.3L, as the 74-77 were 3.0L non-intecoooler turbo's.

    Actually, an 1978-79,86-89 with a G-50 is the way to go for any properly sorted 930

  • Wow, a car keeping up with another car at an HPDE. Big fucking deal. Not all drivers have comparable abilities at track days, and most are there to learn. Put me in a new Z06 and watch me be 2 minutes off pace because I don't know the track, don't know the car, and only have Auto-X experience.

    This is a case of a guy in a slower, older car, keeping up with the DRIVER in a faster, newer car. Put these two cars in a wheel-to-wheel race with equally competent drivers and show me who wins.

  • Apples to oranges. I can't believe how intensely you folks defend your personal "favorite"... And I'm sure the majority of you currently own neither. ;)

  • right?

  • 993 C2S X51 3.8L....

  • Giving a wave-by for the pass -

  • Agreed - the Vette is a nice piece of engineering for the money. . . but there is nothing like a Porsche. The German engineering is all about doing a lot with a little. Making the most of the displacement in a fine tuned balance of weight and power.

  • Absolutely. The 911 has 6 decades of engineering experience behind it, and all those years it has retained the same basic design. The same cannot be said about any other car out there. It's a car that remains humble, timeless, and an aggressive competitor on the steet or track, be it a '73 Carrera RS or a GT2. The same cannot be said about a Corvette.

  • uhh, yes it can...the corvette was introduced in the fifties, and is currently a force to be reckoned with on the American Le Mans series, not to mention its many victories over the past several years. I'm a huge Porsche fan, but give credit where credit is due.

  • Despite being released in the '50s, the Corvette still isn't on par with the 911. I'm speaking only in terms of it's success as a race car, not the car's overall pedigree. The Corvette made a huge impact on the automotive world in the 20th century, there's no arguing that.

  • @74LesPaul

    I find German engineering tends to be code for idiotically convoluted design. Not so much in Porsche's case, but the BMWs, Benzes, and VW/Audis I've owned or worked on tended to be the most unpleasant things I've ever had to maintenance.

  • @hjjfffaa Probably because you did;nt know what you're doing..

  • @hjjfffaa The problem lies in the fact that you have to be smarter than what you are working on. I am a mechanic as well and find working on Porsches,BMWs,Audis,Mercs fairly easy and straight forward.. But then I am German:-) tschüß

  • Again, Corvette for the win. Porsche has developed a task force to figure out how to deal with Corvette. They'll have to mark down the sick premium and also cost of ownership.

  • LOL that Zo6 is New!! that 930 the way it's set up is prob a 35 to 45K car and is 20 some years older than the vette

  • First 930 with the 3.0 engine was born in 1977, then the 3.3 one was born in 1989, but US version are always less powerful than Europe versions (from 265 to 282hp for the most powerful 930 in USA compare to 300hp in Europe)

  • The 3.3L turbo came to the states in '86. The last year of it was '89 1/2, with the 5 speed tranny. '88 owner here.

  • hey do you know what the annual maintenance would be on these things?

  • Cool vid!! Two fantastic machines doing what they were made for

  • Even this very old Porsche can keep up with a much more powerful corvette,Porsche beats them all ;)

  • Vettes and Porsches are both great...they are just different answers to the same question. Neither of the designs are inferior, they are just different approaches...both very entertaining in thier own way. I used to have a C-5 and I just bought a 930...I wish I could have both at once!

  • The driver of the 930 has serious courage to drive a 930 like that....This is maybe one of the most dangerous I have EVER driven.

  • Gotta laugh when a thirty year old Porsche which you can buy for 25 grand keeps up with a new Vette. And then you get the idiots who feel compelled to badmouth Porsche, who have won tens of thousands of races. What do you see every week at every race track in the country? Hundreds of 30 year old Porsches outracing new cars.

  • TURBO RULES ALL

  • I'd love to see where Airox180 gets his data from. The Porsche 917 made over 1700 hp and ran non-stop for 24 hours at Lemans, placing 1st, 2nd, etc ... several years in a row - in the late 60's / early 70's. All from 5 liters of engine capacity. Never seen a 2000 hp Vette coming close to that. What are semi slicks? Race tires for a Kenworth?

  • I see that you have done your homework on porsche race history and a very good job you have done aswell. The 917 absolutely dominated @ lemans with it's normally aspirated 4.9ltr flat 12(560bhp), with a top speed of 248 if you could handle it since the car wanted to leave the pavement. It destroyed the canam series in turbocharged form(917/30), producing over 1550bhp on it's 5ltr flat 12. It is now known as "The Legend."

  • That 1550 hp although very accurate, was a conservative figure. It is no secret that with adjustable boost, the car could be tweaked while driving to make the additional hp for the Mulsanne straight. That car struck fear into the hearts of many top drivers who had the privilege of driving one. I'd tell you the story about how heat-softened fiberglass engine shrouds once got sucked into the engine under full throttle but there's limited space here.

  • Not nearly as much as insanely stupid responses on the internet -

  • Porsches Suck!

  • u suck big ol cock!

  • To redshift1340, Yeh whatever,Porsches still suck...

  • id agree with u if u gave a reason or two to back it up... Like they suck because the dumb germans put the engine behind the rear wheels, or they're bug-eyed, or have looked the same for 40 years lol. I dunno, anything. Just dont say they suck cuz they suck

  • Of course they suck... 1. Because you can't afford one... 2. Because you'll NEVER own one...

  • to MRK4JC,

    Compared to ur sucky ass car, The porsche will pulverize you. Another thing-GET A LIFE WILL YA! Porsches are so much cheaper to buy and they are so much more fun to drive.

  • To nocomment33, as a former 2002 Turbo owner, I realized that my lifelong dream car was overprised(purchase & maintenance) and underpowered at 420hp. The car was heavy and the slower than I had hoped. It was akward at speed in turns also.

  • Did you ever have a 1970's 930?

  • To nocomment33, My dad had a 79 930 when I was in High School and I drove it to my prom. In the early 70's, he had a 59 Convertible D. All aluminum body, original knock off wheels, Nardi steering wheel, triple black. It was pretty much a show car, that he drove the piss out of.

  • So you don't like Porsche's in other words?

    That's alright with me but i still like them.

  • To nocomment33, I had a 1970 914/6 with a 77 2.7 S motor and webers. I beat 911's all day long at Willow Springs. That was a fun car. Then I had an 83 911SC in 85. Hey if Porsches are your thing, then you probally don't mind spending money on them. For me, I just got tired of it. That's all. Many Blessings to you.

  • Thanx :P

    Yea, My dad had a 914 and even he thinks it was a fun car! Peace to you too!

  • To nocomment33, I can tell, you have never owned a Porsche. You have never experienced the pain of writing large checks to the dealership cashier. I sold that car late last year, and bought a brand new silver ZO6 Corvette and love it.

  • Actually, i do own a Porsche-its a 1996 993Turbo and i love it. that car has excellent handling by the way.

  • Actually, you both have small weiners. The only thing worse than fighting on the internet is... oh wait it hasn't been invented.

  • if u have a weiner at all, go screw yourself and fuck off.

  • hahahahahaha. you're so tough man, it hurts. Do you have a barbed wire tattoo on your massive biceps?

  • ...and do you wear a white/white tuxedo with a red tie holding a submachine gun? With a guy who doesn't have any videos and loves watching volvo's, i don't think so.

  • This is a really good clip although i don't get the comments. What is the point of some of them? It's a '06/'07? Z06 racing a what...'82 930!? If there is anything that needs to be recognized it would be the fact that an '82 porsche is keeping up with the latest product that america has to offer. So what if it has 420bhp or weighs whatever, IT'S AN '82 MODEL PORSCHE that definitely needs suspension tweaking. For Gods' sake, if your going comment a video, be valid with your points. Good run guys.

  • The Z leaves it in the corners !

  • Awesome clip.

  • Lousy driver.

  • Power to weight ratio is way different...

    The Porsche only weighs rougly 2600lbs, and the Vette weighs 3132 lbs...the 50 hp that the Vette has over the 930 is far negated by its extra 532 lbs of weight...

    And that is after GM put the Corvette on a diet...

    So basically I suppose it would be like driving a Buick Roadmaster with a Z06 engine in it lol

  • what a stupid analogy..you might have well have said minivan with a Z06 engine in it!

  • You suppose wrong. Why don't you read webheads comment? He actually owns the cars. Only he owns a C5Z, not a C6Z that wieghs the same and has an extra 100hp.

  • I've got both cars - a 400BHP 930 and a C5Z06

    0 - 60mph - there's nothing between them - top speed the vette has it by a whisker

    2 different methods of creating 400bhp and high performance. The vette is more forgiving, easier to drive, the 930 is a bitch but ultimately more rewarding when you get it right - and very painful if you get it wrong

    btw my 930 is quicker than GT3's and modern 911's

  • You sir are one hell of a lucky guy if it's the truth you're saying [hey this is the internet, I can never be sure :P] :)

  • thanks bud - and yes it's true :)

  • P/W ratio is nearly identical. For now. Add more boost and fuel and.... ;-)

  • Oh and Turbo adds a lot of torque. I`d go for the Z06, the engine has far more potntial than the little boxer six.

  • lol, putting that power down on a real track is a totally different story. and the boxer has plenty of potential... more than enough to match the p/w and get it effectively to the ground in a trackable manner.

  • The Boxer has far less potential than the LS7. Never seen a 2000 hp Porsche.

  • Yeah but have you seen any other engine with 15000 race wins on it's record? Have you seen any other engine with 600 bhp while Aircooled?!! It's the most successful engine ever built and it's still contemporary even if it's essentially the same since 1964!!

  • "It's the most successful engine ever built and it's still contemporary even if it's essentially the same since 1964!!"

    Ummm... I think you could say the same thing about the small block chevy. Only from 1956 instead of 1964.

  • chevy small blocks rule!!!!

  • That Porsche must be stronger. Z06 eats 997 Turbo and GT3, proven in Sport Auto magazine.

  • I find the fact that GM ppl strained to get the Z06 up to its best time 7:42.9 while Porsche went on a couple of visits and made 7:40 911T and 7:39 GT3 :)

    Still 7:42 is impressive though, I'm glad an iconic car as the Vette finally made it as a good car, but come on, Porsche's are better :))) [in the end it goes to which car one subjectively prefers actually]

  • LOL, those Porsche numbers are total crap. Make it 7:50 and 7:49 and that is more realistic.

  • Strained? It only took Jan 3 runs to get that time. He did it in one day and it was unseasonably humid, which would have taken the edge off of the LS7s 505hp. Under ideal conditions he could have done better.

  • dont listen to everything you hear...porsche is overall better car. but vettes have come a long way in the passed 10 years...still not better ;)

  • The C6 Z06 did the Hockenheim Ring in 1.11,5. No other stock porsche, except the Carrera GT is faster. Even the 997 Turbo with semi slicks an the new GT3 RS couldn`t beat that time, both were slightly slower. The new Turbo without semi slicks was over 2 seconds slower than the Z06 per lap.

  • yeah and the 997 GT2 eats it back..

  • Shows you how good kumho tires are. And they most likely cost half as much as the hoosiers and will last almost twice as long.

  • great clip.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more