Canon 1D Mark IV Shutter at 10 fps

[canonNsigmafanamac]

Awesome fps for action photography !

[mike112regio23]

that sound let my think of the soud of a harley the nices sound on earth

[jschlads12]

thats one hell of a dust picker upper!

[taltool24198]

Yeah!!! Suck in that DUST BABE!!!

[nPandagr]

still to slow

[Wundermacher]

Just like a sewing machine :-D

[Skupik1]

sounds like my TDI Golf on an early frosty morning...

[apeyuen]

@Skupik1 HAHA...

[ladev1988]

Sounds like my grandmas old foot operated sowing machine

[quizilver]

sounds like an old diesel engine :)

[WeRtheO]

Just got mine... too cool

[xXlukefoxXx]

i love that camera*___*

[BrandonKingVloggin]

Camera: Oh hello dust. Please do come in.

Dust: Yeah yeah we're gonna kill your sensor.

[xXlukefoxXx]

@BrandonKingVloggin i think, this one who has the money for this camera, surely has a fully evacuated room without any dust:D

[BrandonKingVloggin]

@xXlukefoxXx It's still risky.. What are the odds that it's just in a normal room of his house . However... the camera: NOM NOM NOM DUST.

[zdumbi]

oh shitt ... my canon 40D tooks just 6.5 frame / s ...:( yours is much better !... you HAVE to be a better photographer ! .... noob

[Gestraz]

Goodbye clean sensor...

[kdogfernandez2131]

That's definitely not 10 fps

[timberswiss3]

sure doesn't sound like 10fps

[Claggy]

Glad to see I'm not the only one who doesn't think it is 10 fps, haha.

[Goldmember655]

that doesn't sound like 10fps its sounding more like 5fps

[ukmitch86]

say bye-bye to 100 frames off rated shutter life...

[MrCOLTSR2]

my cock is bigger than yours!.....what's the point of such burst rates...in reality they don't help you get THAT one important sports pic..but what they do is they make a photographer LAZY! and out of touch with his subject!...photography is all about being one with your camera and the moment..not bashing out a million pics a sec in the vain hope you will have caught the right moment by accident!....lazy modern photography and expensive toys...stick with the basics and learn to take proper pics!

[rorrt]

I think only bad photographers have to use 10fps.

It gives no advantage to any photographer.

In the olden days, when sports photographers used film, my uncle was one of those photographers, he used to shoot rugby.

And how many shots did he make of the a person scoring a try, 2 maybe 3.

And of those 2/3, he would almost always near to 80% of the time have a usable photo, that could go in the papers the next day.

Spraying and praying, does nothing but waste memory card space.

[0SKBooth0]

@rorrt @mrcoltsr2 it really depends on the sports. for some sports, like swimming, tennis, maybe even american football the 10fps can be very helpful. for some other sports, however, you are exactly right, timing is freakin everything! the 10fps merely helps!

[rorrt]

@0SKBooth0

I see your point, but whos job is the photographer? Its his job to spot the moment, the decisive moment.

And like i said, my uncle refused to use a motor drive on his camera, to boost the frame rate up to 3fps.

Because then you are just a camera operator. You have little to no choice over what you are photographing.

Although...I did see a great use of it, on a baseball batter, and 4 7Ds wired up, with a delay, to get an extremely high quality 40fps.

[MrCOLTSR2]

@0SKBooth0 YEP I AGREE WITH RORRT HERE...SURE 10fps may help the lazy or inapt photographer (god knows there are enough of them about!).it may help in very unique rare situations but 99.9% of the time you dont need it & its just a selling point...hey lets go the whole hog & have 100fps...then any idiot can capture that moment!..where is the skill in that?.& who wants to delete all those crappy superfluous pics?...the real skill & JOY of photography is to be at one with the camera & the moment!

[videodaddy99]

@MrCOLTSR2 that's nonsense. If I had a camera that could shoot 100 fps (raw files) I would use it. Yes it is a skill to get the right moment, but if I can have the camera make it easier, I will use it. Just like I can focus, but I prefer to have the camera do it because it makes it easier for me, or using TTL flash to get the right balance between ambient and flash and so on. You know, some moment can't be repeated if you missed it. A great photographer will pick great tools to help him.

[MrCOLTSR2]

@videodaddy99 There is a BIG difference between a GREAT photographer and a fake one who depends on technology to such an extent that the skill is taken out of the moment and replaced with technology!...if u cant see that then ur a fool!....hey dont kid yourself pretending that it was YOU who took that one important moment when in reality it was the 10fps burst rate and u were just along for the ride pressing a button!..thats not skill or a great photographer!..dont fuckin delude yourself dude!

[MrCOLTSR2]

@videodaddy99 Soon Super HD camcorders will grant your wish!..complete with ultra efficient lens systems &100+fps....then all u have to do is video a duck taking off from a lake..go home review the 500 super hi res frames & pic the 1 that suits u & tell everyone what a great photographer & how skilled u where to get that 1 special moment!..only thing is by then EVERYONE will already be doing the same thing!...in the end the joy & skill of photography will be gone forever replaced by technology!

[videodaddy99]

@MrCOLTSR2 Technology makes great photos possible, it does not create a great photo.

[MrCOLTSR2]

@videodaddy99 i totally agree and i understand without such improvements we would all be using silver nitrate and old wooden box cameras with expensive plates loaded in the back....i just find some of the more superfluous options on today's cameras like super duper high fps are taking part of the spirit and soul away from the art of photography but i accept you point...

[akibble99]

Here we go guys (10fps): /watch?v=sakYbpIvdUc

[Sykeye7]

THAT'S SLOW! That's not 10 FPS!!!! check how 10-11 FPS should sound like

by clicking on the D3 FPS video

[maxsadist]

see nikon

A5Km2pCM0K0

[wszystkozajete01]

sounds like old diesel :)

[vomitronic]

My 50D sounds faster. It was slow motion mode ON, or what?

[TheOm3ga]

@vomitronic your 50D may sound faster, but it's actually slower

[vomitronic]

@TheOm3ga It even sounds like my old 1DMkIII with slow mode ON - 3fps.

[snellyification]

the awkward moment when you have to sit and delete 200 photos of white !

[FunnySkatersPuga]

@snellyification DELETE ALL ?



[SullanFilms]

@snellyification Or just format your card..

[johangd]

@snellyification or u can just format the card :)

[MrSamperkins]

@snellyification or turn on with out cf card and remove ur cf card and firing away.

[Tosisforsaken]

@snellyification select all and delete smart ass

[lookfindwatchme]

@snellyification ill format my card 

[davidjewels]

@snellyification couldn't stop laughing at your comment ha ha! Love it!

[likeawhispr]

@snellyification So awkward that most people would just format the card before even thinking of fiddling with the silly delete button :)

[weinerschnitzelboy]

@snellyification I don't know if they have this for other cameras, but on even Canon Point and Shoots, they let you select a range of photos to delete.

[tuffgost]

@snellyification You shoot without a memory card. Then you don't have anything to delete.

[Bongo2k]

@snellyification Or you could just format?

[Terrystearsatlfc]

Did I just get shot?

[TheFrogglette]

Andy porn!!



[tomislavhecimovic]

It sounds like ww2 german machine gun

[perryjoseph19]

ok so that was definatly not 10fps and you are gonna get one dusty sensor doing that

[1337shellc0der]

TOOO MUCH DUST!!!

[sosvocaloid]

D3 beats canon shutter any day lol.

[mitsubishidiamante]

very expensive camera

[chancho00]

They just need 14fps more for 24 and take pictures of 2 or 4 pixels for 2k or 4k video and there you have it, a real digital cinema camera or RED cameras do this already or just use electronic shutter like every video camera out there?.

[MrChrisdavie]

@chancho00 you can't compare a interpolated image from a "4k" red camcorder to a true 4896 x 3264 still from a dlsr :D If these dlsr's ran at 24fps+ it would blow any camera in existence out of the water!

[dor1997yaniv]

hoooo, sexy !

[ClankyRochet]

Canon should do more full frame body.

[GMSamuelRhine]

Not even close the d700 does 8fps alot faster than that

[paladin61368]

@GMSamuelRhine

...it does 8 frames per second faster than 10 frames per second? did you even think before you typed that?

[GMSamuelRhine]

@paladin61368 did you even think before you typed this fukin cok suker?

i said the d700 is faster than the fps of the camera in this video, this is nowhere close to 10fps fuzzy twat

[paladin61368]

@GMSamuelRhine

What the fuck is a "cok suker"?

learn how to spell, you fucking useless piece of shit. If you read your comment, you say "the d700 does 8fps alot faster than that" so no matter what you meant, you were saying it somehow does 2 less frames per second, but faster than this camera. What?

[GMSamuelRhine]

@paladin61368 yeah way to try and make a come back than say the same retarded shit over again. Stay up all night thinking about that one?

[paladin61368]

@GMSamuelRhine

I repeated it, because you obviously didn't understand. And me? make a comeback? from what? All you did was call me a "fukin cok suker".

[GMSamuelRhine]

@paladin61368 trollololol

[paladin61368]

@GMSamuelRhine

I'm not even mad.

[GMSamuelRhine]

@paladin61368 and where did you get that implication from? turns out your a big idiot all over here so i'll just leave you too your fun.

[watduzhkstand4]

fail much? No where close to 10fps

[themomentone]

dear maker of this video:

pls know, that only chuck norris can still do 10 fps with a shutter speed like 1/4

[Scwirul]

Have fun with the dust.

[iasahuman]

no to match to nikon either

[hanjo1505]

the title of the video is misleading.

[bbills3293]

NIKON D3s!!!!!!!! woot woot 11fps!

[sonusTV]

@bbills3293 woot woot the d3s only got 12mp woot woot

you cant compare cameras with different sensors and mp in continuous burst issues

[bbills3293]

@sonusTV lol i know i was just kidding. But also for the sake of argument, MPs mean NOTHING anymore. Its all about ISO and low light functionality. D3s also wins hands down at that. Canon does have a tits AF though. :) just saying

[bobsizzz]

@bbills3293 I think you are quite wrong. The more Megapixels the more control you have over the picture. Lets say you want to zoom and crop a photo. If you do not have enough MBs you are limited to how much you can crop a photo without loosing detail. So you have to look at all aspects of photography. Every function is important to getting the best photo possable.

[nukshall]

@bobsizzz First of all it's "possible", "possable" does sound funnier though.And second of all: sooo further down that chain of thought an ideal camera should have 1000...000 MP so you could cover up just about everything in the picture and be able to zoom in indefinetely?What happened to the photographer's skill, on how to frame and how to make choices between certain details?I'm not saying you should limit the number of MP(it's a good option),but it doesn't necessarely make it a camera better.

[bobsizzz]

@nukshall First thank you for correcting my spelling error. And you are quite right about a photographers skill. I don’t care how sophisticated a camera is, it is still up to the photographer to just take a picture or a work of art. But when seeing which camera is best you still need to look at everything. And MP is one of them. The more you have the more versatile you can be with the picture. I personally think the war is with ISO than anything else.

[xxgwyloxx]

@bobsizzz the more MP you have the more noise you can intake. There should be a balance. I'd say 1D Mark IV has it.

[bobsizzz]

@xxgwyloxx Well I wouldn't go as far as saying the Mark IV has it. I think digital has come a long way and yes the Mark IV is a great camera but I think there is lots of room for improvment. Like less noise at higher ISO's is a BIG ONE. And all manufactures are having problems with this. When you can take a picture with an ISO above 1000 and there is NO noise then life would be great. Plus I would like to see flash sync rates way above 250. There is lots of room for improvment in all areas.

[xxgwyloxx]

@bbills3293 on DX crop, however.

[blancoschmidt1]

Awfully noisy...



[VillaLuifer]

@blancoschmidt1 You suck asshole. Go fuck Vera, and stop saying stupid things here about Barranquilla being the best city ever, when in fact it's nothing but a big thieves' nest. Period.

[JasonNepster]

i turn to a different window as this was loading then i thought i was being shot at!

[TheChuvachishe]

ну и нахуя - ЭТО?!

[axel2935]

mi nikon's d7000 is faster than that :D

[NinjaDKDavid]

battery is low guys...

[AldossariEOS]

100% Fake

[Xyb3rTeCh]

this guy is a retard

[donttrustany1]

@Xyb3rTeCh you took the words right out of my....fingers?

[MarcTheKiller009]

Sounds like a diesel engine !

[JonoFP]

ya thats not ten

[Streamtronics]

Sounded like 8

[Feelis7]

this is king

[mehmetnayal]

D3s .. 11FPS :)

[boilerjack]

@mehmetnayal 11fps in dx mode not fx nice try tho.

[TheRealrocker74]

set it to H instead of L.

[grabedigger]

Is it the camera repeating the word DUST like 7 times in a second??

[BOSERNR1]

dust dust dust dust dust dust dust dust dust dust dust dust dust dust dust

[guica1001]

definitely not 10 fps

[panape]

fap fap fap fap fap fap

[selfenten]

Okay 10 frames in a second... But that's true with very short exposures. In the twillight, when ten exp. times are longer than, or nearly one sec, it's not an easy task to make ten 1/5 sec exposures in only one sec.

Unless the camera has an extra function that makes possible to open and close the mirrors during a negative or zero time period... :))) Who knows...? It's even not easy to detect a mirror opening in -0,02 sec. Time machine... :)))

It could answer, why the hell it is so expensive :)

[iron0an]

@selfenten the 10 fps is made for sports in the open areas with much light,surely not for portraits and nature.

[zeroexcfg]

I would like to see the Pictures coming out of this :D

[concorde35mm]

Not bad but it can't take photos in full frame at 10 fps, the EOS 1V - 35mm film SLR can so its full frame photos beat the 1D IV every time :-).

[nyalasteve99]

yeh, the exposure was maybe 1/100, thats why is slow. i he put it to 1/1000 at least, then it sounds 10 fps.

[wowcolors]

yes that is not 10fps, he must of had the shutter speed set to low, dude put it in manual or Tv, set the shutter to something fast and redo this video

[bellci]

That really doesn't sound like 10fps...

[jakes777777]

@bellci its not .. they have the shutter speed set too long

[KabakaLion]

This camera is supposed to go a lot faster than this. I'm guessing the exposure was set to something long enough that it couldn't fit 10 frames in one second. Nice job screwing that up!

[GOBbluthagain]

10 fps doesnt sound this slow

[dokke82]

wow, great exhibition of how to get dust on your sensor @ not even 10fps...

nice dude, real nice...

[quickshooter100]

yep, not 10 !! my d300 sounds faster!

[nomanoki]

great sound! ;-)

[Xyb3rTeCh]

rubbish... that's not 10fps...

[SuperTrullala]

never 10 fps more like 6-8 fps

sounds like my 50d

[xXxmidgexXx]

dang!

[770827]

So what's the point of showing this?? at this point, the 7D is already doing 8fps...

[Pilot853]

More like 6fps

[OMATICH]

@Pilot853 because it actually flicks the mirror like 16 times to balance the mirror slap, so you can't hear all of them.

[Mzahaka1313]

@Pilot853 i would say 8fps

[CBOYDRUN]

yeah this is actually at ~7.2 fps NOT 10 fps

[kamikazerenegade]

Good god...