lol, Savage rocks. Perez is a piece of sh*t - I don't care if he's gay but he deserves what he gets for his misogynistic comments toward Carrie just for saying the same thing as Obama did.
And letting Perez judge a beauty contest is a joke, has anyone seen what this guy looks like? You might as well let a 90lb skinny guy judge a bodybuilding contest.
I think it was wrong that the Miss America contestant got reamed so bad because of her opinion, but to say that homos are responsible for everything bad that happens in America is fucking stupid. I usually can agree with Savage to an extent but sometimes I have to just tune him out.
Savage just dreams the US could go back to the 1950's. Sadly, globalization came through (which was especially accelerated by Reagan) and made his dream impossible to realize, thus the continual ranting on radio...
HE'S GAY SO HE HATES WOMAN? WHAT A MORON. WHY DO GAY MEN MAKE SUCH GOOD HAIR STYLISTS AND DESIGNERS OF WOMEN'S CLOTHES THEN?
A GAY GUY CAN BE MORE OBJECTIVE ABOUT A WOMAN'S BEAUTY BECAUSE HE DOESNT WANNA HAVE SEX WITH THEM.ARE STRAIGHT WOMEN EXEMPT FROM JUDGING WOMAN'S BEAUTY TOO? SAVAGE IS A IDIOT. HE IS ANTI GAY WITH HIS FALLACIES CAUSE HE IS A SELF HATING BISEXUAL. LOOK IT UP HE USED SEND LOVE LETTERS TO ALAN GINSBERG.SAVAGE COME OUT OF THE CLOSET!
whatever a bender gets upto in their own home is their business, if it involves taking a cock up their jacksy and having bullbags in their mouth, then its a filthy business and they should all have their houses burnt down.
@russellziske he's entitles to his opinions but he isn't entitled to his own facts. he lives in is mammalian brain half the time. gay men hate women? they can't judge a woman's beauty? that's pure fallacy. slippery slope logic. savage was wrong about wmds,marijuana, and many things. he has even recanted on many issues contradicting himself. if you thin he's right your not paying attention and you are not a critical thinker,just blindly accepting what the master savage tells you like a child.
It is not uncommon for homosexuals to be found in such an avenue. Many gays work in the female fashion industry. Why? I dunno, maybe they are drawn to thinking about wearing such clothing.
Has any caller ever finished a sentence to this maniacal little fraud? Why would anyone diminish their integreity by even trying to reason with, or address this madman?
@Romansteel13 - You needn't be angry that Savage is angry, he is always angry. He was raised under auspices of family heritage that embarrassed him and never catered to his strange and unorthodox illusions. He will never become normalized to the culture in which he lives and enjoys, but I don't think that he is an avowed homosexual, just severely recalcitrant and ungrounded.
@Romansteel13 Huh? It appeared (from your earlier response) that you were angry (mad). I was just attempting to assuage your needless expression of contempt.
@Romansteel13 'WHO' was on first? LOL You have the audacity to characterize my sexuality and temperament without knowing me, basing those assessments on nothing other than your feeling offended by our divergent sentiments toward your 'hero' icon? ... and then you exhibit the temerity and bad taste to proffer a condescending and obsequious "Good day" as a closing expression of 'goodwill'?
No wonder you are resultant protege of this bitter and deranged talkshow personality.
@Romansteel13 HI TROLL!!!! XD Where you been?? Boy I've missed you :)
Can I ask, are you male or female today? Is your PhD in Psychiatry or Nuclear Physics today? Is your mother still from the Osaka region or are you another different nationality today?? LOL :)
if you look at history almost all major wars and societal collapse was preceded by a period of gluttonous immoral behavior. The pendulum always swings back.
@Harlock4mg - We ARE losing our freedoms, bit by bit, to the tyranny of political correctness. The fact is that Hilton is a fat homosexual pervert who hates women, and who deliberately posed a loaded trick question to Ms. Prejean PRECISELY because of her (nominally) conservative Christian values. It is very likely because of their subsequent demonization of her that she became a pro-family activist.
@Harlock4mg - To you, ANYONE who stands for traditional values and the family is "fascist." No, YOU are the real fascist - a liberal fascist who only cares about advancing the agenda and nothing about the consequences of this agenda to society at large. Go back to San Francisco's Castro district and your S&M bondage sessions.
@Harlock4mg - Also, in this year's Miss USA contestant a judge who is pro-open borders and pro-illegal immigration, asked Miss Oklahoma about her opinions on the Arizona SB 1070, again as a political litmus test. She supported their initiative - and the judge effectively disqualified her for consideration in winning the Miss USA pageant - which was won by a Lebanese Muslim Hezbollah supporter.
@Harlock4mg - The fact is that the Miss USA contest has become yet another star chamber to enforce political correctness and uniformity of thought, speech and behavior, like every other avenue of society today. Sorry, the only idiot here is you.
@jons44 - So you take the side of a fat homosexual pervert who set her up, because you don't like her views on marriage, you foul-mouthed, sexist, woman-hating, misogynistic piece of trash? Who's your idea of an "ideal" woman - Nancy Pelosi? Barbara Boxer? Janet Napolitano? Elena Kagan? You wouldn't speak that way of any of the Hollyweird leftist wackjobs like Ellen "Juno" Page or Marion Cotillard (a 9/11 truther, B.T.W.), would you? Let alone Miley Cyrus who's been totally corrupted by PC?
@wmbrown6 Don't get me wrong. I don't have a problem with how she feels about marrige. I also don't have a problem with women jerking off on video. I love porn. What I don't like is people who hide who they really are. Of course Hollywood is full of judgemental people. Fuck Hollywood. But how do you call you call yourself a conservative and have a video like that floating around? So fuck her too.
@jons44 - The media leaked that video as retribution for her not following the politically correct doxies about marriage. They, like the Obama gang, have been fully schooled in the Saul Alinsky tactics of personal destruction. And the Miss USA pageant is similarly stacked against any other contestant who doesn't bow down to PC dogmas - as when Miss Oklahoma lost a chance at the crown due to her supporting Arizona's immigration initiatives, while her questioner took the side of the La Raza crowd.
@Harlock4mg - Typical loaded question from a depraved, degenerate, deviant mind. You are evidently against the family and traditional values and common decency/morality, otherwise you wouldn't be taking the side of perverts against upstanding people. You AGREE with this campaign of personal destruction against anyone that goes by biblical and societal rather than political correctness, or otherwise you wouldn't be asking that type of loaded question.
@Harlock4mg - Your spurious assumptions that border on slander have no place here - and nor do you. What planet do you live on (never mind what world)?
@Harlock4mg - Your questions are about as legitimate as a three-dollar bill - in short, not at all. I WON'T answer any of your loaded questions because it's evident you're trying to trap me (as you do to anyone who doesn't agree with your ideology).
@wmbrown6 you're just avoiding the question because despite your post which Btw are utterly pretentious and condescending your views have no real merit.
@Harlock4mg - Wrong. Your question does not deserve any consideration because to you, anything having to do with traditional values, the family, and preserving the institution of marriage as between a man and a woman is "paranoid." Among those who agree with your types are judicial activist elitists who have a proclivity for overruling the will of the people time and again, and imposing their will on everyone by fiat.
@wmbrown6 You opinions are so entertaining, forget that their not saltire.
Wmbrowm, you ceaselessly prattle about bleary Family Values although I would speculate you have no real understanding of it. Wht you refust to realize is that
Family Values are not under assault by same sex Marriage or Liberal elitism.
@Harlock4mg - Oh, anything that has to do with tradition and family values is "entertaining" in your warped, twisted, perverted, depraved "opinion." Your denials of reality, in fact, are NOT funny. By your denials, in fact you SUPPORT such an assault on the family by the radical Left and the militant "gay" activists.
@Harlock4mg - That's a problem with someone like you, anyone who supports the family and traditional values is automatically a "troll" to someone like you who are evidently against both.
@Harlock4mg - Since you are so anti-family and pro-depravity, your loaded question deserves no answer whatsoever. Not to mention your automatic assumption that anyone standing up for traditional values is a "troll." Not to mention your smug, arrogant, haughty, condescending, elitist sense of superiority to everyone else to stereotype anyone who disagrees with you as "stupid."
@Harlock4mg - But historically and societally, marriage is MEANT as between one man and one woman, for the purpose of producing children in order to keep the society alive (whereas two men or two women CANNOT bear children). The Left has been at war with sexual morals and especially traditional values since the 1960's. Among their weapons have been "free love," pornography, homosexuality - and, in recent years, this phony "gay marriage" racket.
@wmbrown6 you have a right to your views but I still have to disagree with you. if you believe that marriage is about having children why aren't we denying marriage to couples that can't have children?
their not keeping the society alive but we don't deny them the rights to marriage?
I believe that marriage between two consenting adult is perfectly fine with me and from research I've done it doesn't cause social decline.
@Harlock4mg - You see, you have clearly been indoctrinated by the cult of moral relativism and equivalence. This has nothing whatsoever to do with civil rights. It has everything to do with the culture of licentiousness and "if it feels good, do it in the road," and with a group of people living an "alternative lifestyle" putting their own adult desires above the interests of the children. Every society that has given a seal of approval to this insanity has seen native populations decline...
@wmbrown6 "Every society that has given a seal of approval to this insanity has seen native populations decline..."
the actual reason most countries are seeing a decline in their population is due mostly to the standers of living have been getting better and life expectancy is rising. also, typically the countries that are having a low birth are usually more educated as well.
@Harlock4mg - Don't you mean, people's standard of living becoming such that: a) they have a sense of entitlement, that the world somehow owes them something, and b) they have way too much time on their hands, indulging in behaviors that are destructive to both them and society. A good portion of the high costs of medical care are related to treatment for AIDS and other sexual diseases.
(CONT'D) ...while importing foreign populaces that have no loyalty to the country, and indeed are openly hostile to the society and seek to impose their own culture. In Europe, for example, the pushing of homosexuality has led to a decline in fertility rates per family to less than 2 (and some even bordering on 1), while Muslims who do not live any decadent lifestyles reproduce anywhere from 5 to 10 times the rate of natural-born populations. This plus the push for illegal-alien amnesty...
@Harlock4mg - Correction: Low birth rates among liberal leftists and secular atheists who are more selfishly concerned with themselves and their own pursuit of pleasure than of continuing the cycle of a community. The only "uneducated" I know of are those from Third World and Middle Eastern countries who knock off children like Taystee Bread. Also, families and traditional values have been increasingly denigrated by Hollywood and the media since the 1960's, and this has taken a toll.
@Harlock4mg - Correction. It is the Left that seeks to glorify sexual perversion and call it "freedom." I'm simply exposing the Left's sordid history of licentiousness. "Dr." Alfred Kinsey (one of the "fathers" of the sexual revolution), for example, was a sexual pervert - as were all his associates who worked with him on his various "studies."
Wrong, you yourself are a de facto pervert by taking the side of those that seek to radically redefine marriage to suit their own lifestyle and adult desires, at the expense of the children and the continuation of a society. Your intrusive and invasive baiting will not work, so you can just stop it right there. Furthermore, do you support polygamy? Group marriage? Bestiality? And if not, why are you so narrow-minded in that realm? It's ALL about preferential treatment and special privileges.
@wmbrown6 "slanderous smears" a little hypocritical you think?
Your the kind of smug imbecile that if you cannot win an argument, instead you throw Ad hominem attacks.slander do not affect me, cause, I know who I am.
I also know what the motives are of the people that do it.
So wmbrown6, it's a new age, you do not have to hide it anymore just come out of the closet already.
@Harlock4mg - To you, anyone who challenges your indoctrinated political correctness is an "imbecile." Just because "the times" have changed does not mean that societal mores that have been in place for millennia should just be discarded like an old, crumpled tissue. What is at play here is a cabal of radical special-interest groups seeking to upend all moral standards to suit their "anything goes" / "if it feels good, do it in the road" ethos.
@Harlock4mg - Let us also remember that the filthy judge that tossed out and completely nullified and invalidated the votes of 7 million Californians in the 2008 election is an avowed, open homosexual whose lifestyle dictates his entire worldview on the issues at hand. This is someone whose private life DOES matter and DOES have disastrous implications for the society at large.
@wmbrown6 Wrong, the so call Vote was bullshit (even-though voting is a trick to make the peasants of feel likes their in control!)and if we ever allowed people to vote on what rights a "minority" has we would still have slavery in America,so I could care less THE VOTERS. beside, the American voter is a complete dishonest,stupid,self-serving dick anyway.
@Harlock4mg - Listen, punk, you have no basis to support any of YOUR dogmas, other than what the leftist media put in your stupid head. I go by empirical evidence. You go by what propaganda a bunch of radical activists only concerned with their own selfish pursuit of pleasure spew forth. The American Psychiatric Association, for example, has been totally taken over by the radical homosexual mafia.
@Harlock4mg - YOU are nonsense ALL the way. Go peddle your junk at the Daily Kos or Huffington Post where there'll be mindless zombies who'll agree with your rambling rants and support for the forces of decadence and licentiousness.
@Harlock4mg - It's obvious that you're an illiterate nobody who can't even spell to save your life. To you, ANYONE who has a concrete values system based on millennia of history "doesn't know what they're talking about," because you're of the morally relativist, "anything goes" / "if it feels good, do it in the road" school.
@Harlock4mg - Wrong. I have every right to call out anyone who is a drone of the radical Left and the sexual licentiousness lobby. It is those people (including, obviously, you) who think any such calling out is "over the top bile." Go look up studies PROVING that children raised in a family with a mom and a dad end up more well-adjusted and prosperous than those raised by single moms or in "families" with two men or two women. I won't hold your putrid hand.
@Harlock4mg - And also, you snot-nosed, stuck-up city slicker elitist who has contempt for anyone who isn't like them, your vulgar, derogatory stereotypes of middle Americans are no different than using the "N"-word for African-Americans. I live in the REAL world, punk. You live in a little ivory-tower existence, looking down on anyone who doesn't bow down to your little political correctness WHICH IS WHAT IS PUSHING THE DRIVE TO RADICALLY REDEFINE MARRIAGE TO MEAN ANYTHING ANYONE WANTS.
@wmbrown6what who dares to insult my Ivory tower, You bow down at once!
The fact f the matter isn't that I'm as you put it " You live in a little ivory-tower existence, looking down on anyone who doesn't bow down to your little political correctness" the fact of the matter is that your just some looser look for a scapegoat to blame for your problems.
@Harlock4mg - Just shut up with that haughty, arrogant, condescending attitude of yours. Your slanderous presumptions of anyone who dares challenge you clearly borders on the defamatory. Why don't you get out of here and peddle your junk at Daily Kos or HuffPo if you want brain-dead zombies who uncritically and unquestioningly agree with every last one of your little dogmas. Your attitude IS the problem here, and your slurs of anybody who challenges you as "losers" underscores your disdain.
@Harlock4mg - That arrogant attitude is typical and proof you ARE an adherent to the PC dogmas of the radical Left. Besides, African-Americans see such specious comparisons of their struggles of the past - which were real enough - to a bunch of perverts demanding preferential treatment and special privileges and the total overhauling of societal mores to suit them. It's obvious that to you, the voter is "stupid" if they don't bow down to the media's elitist agenda.
Make that: African-Americans see such specious comparisons of their struggles of the past - which were real enough - to a bunch of perverts demanding preferential treatment and special privileges and the total overhauling of societal mores to suit them, as reprehensible and insulting. One black preacher even said, "Don't compare your sin to my skin."
@Harlock4mg - And speaking of African-Americans, do you consider THEM "stupid"? 70% of them in California voted to maintain the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman (and these were people who by and large voted for Obama). It is a bunch of radical social engineers and militant activists seeking to redefine such an institution to render it essentially meaningless.
@Harlock4mg - You do not give a d*** about the children, or the future development of our society. You only care about the selfish desires of a tiny radical fringe minority, to wit: 1% of the population essentially out to dictate moral standards for the remaining 99%.
@Harlock4mg - And let me remind you, you are operating on specious, false, slanderous assumptions about the motives of those who question and challenge you. You think EVERYBODY should knuckle under and bend down to your will (which, in truth, is the will of the radical Left) on the matter of sexual morals, which the Left has been at war against for the last 4+ decades, in their bid to destroy the family which to them stands in the way of their imposing their utopian vision on the world.
@Harlock4mg - Because it has NOTHING to do with so-called "equality" - and EVERYTHING to do with the selfish quest for sexual gratification. From Point #26 of the Communist goals of 1963: "Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as 'natural, normal, [and] healthy." Point #25: "Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV." And so on.
(CONT'D) ...will have the effect of making white Anglos a minority in their own country within 50 years. So yes, "gay" marriage DOES have disastrous consequences for the society at large. The "research" you have read was rigged and paid for by the homosexual lobby in order to advance their Bacchanalian agenda and hoodwink those who place blind trust in science that has been sadly politicized in this and some other countries.
And let me clarify about "the push for illegal-alien amnesty" part, for lack of space: Also, the uncontrolled immigration since 1965 of Third Worlders and people from the Middle East and central America who have been encouraged NOT to assimilate into our culture, but instead have been encouraged to live in their own little world, to the point where they are imposing their own customs and values on this country via political correctness. And those people, too, have large families, unlike us.
@jons44 - One can argue till the cows come home about whether even women who enter beauty pageants could be considered "conservative." But in the politically correct world of today, taking a stand that is counter to what the secular leftist elites are pushing is enough to open you to being personally destroyed or your life put in mortal danger.
@wmbrown6 The god-fearing, corporate, right wing elites are just as guilty. I don't want to be told what to think or how to feel from either side. I don't have to accept anything or anyone if I choose not too. I don't have to accept the homosexual agenda but I don't have to be a so-called "patriot" either. I have no "side". I think both the left and right peddle their bullshit.
@jons44 - The point is this: If she had knuckled under to the political correctness that Perez Hilton had demanded by his loaded question which was deliberately selected, we would never had heard of that tape. That is the issue, at the end of the day.
@wmbrown6 Okay. I agree. If there's one thing that I respect from anyone, it's honesty about one's principles For that I give her credit. And yes, that really is the issue in this case. All I'm saying is that a lot conservatives like to throw that "pervert" word around a lot. I'm mean, these days, if you're gonna take the moral high ground, you better not have any skeletons in your closet because someone is gonna dig that shit up.
@wmbrown6 I guess what I'm saying is that my rant is more towards preachy uber moral people that it is about Carrie Prejean. But hey, people are gonna attack you for your opinions in this society no matter what you say today.
@jons44 - What's more, the radical leftist politically correct media blurted out that video and other aspects of her personal life as retribution for her being pro-family and pro-traditional values. They have no tolerance for any other viewpoint other than her own - and obviously, neither do you. Notice the media is silent about Barney Frank's personal life (and all his boyfriends) because he's a flaming leftist who supports the anti-family, pro-sodomite agenda.
I wonder if Dr Savage thinks that women should be allowed to judge women on beauty contests? If that be the case, then would he prefer that homosexual women judge female contestants, if having sexual feelings for someone is important to judge that person in beauty contests.
@valvenis30 Same thing. Gay and faggots are the same thing. And so are the males who are born heterosexuals -- they're as much of faggots. And both of them -- gays and natural heterosexuals -- i.e., the bunch of faggots are the only people besides women who can really appreciate feminine beauty. The straights have no natural inclination to understand femininity or judge it. A straight male can only judge a contest on masculinity -- say, a wrestling match.
Was she arrested after she said what she said, No she wasn't! so she didn't lose any of her rights.
But idiots like Savage and this calling are so stupid and insecure that they lead you to believe in a phony Gay Conspiracies when the truth is they are the true conspirators trying to destroy steal yours and every body else freedom in America!
@Harlock4mg - To you, anyone who supports traditional values and the family is "stupid" because you are an amoral, depraved degenerate who lives a life of sin and iniquity, to such an extent that you've come to hate G-d and His rules for morality. By taking the side of those who seek to radically redefine the institution of marriage to suit their own perverted lifestyle and denigrating those taking a stand for the family and traditional values, you are therefore part of the problem.
@Harlock4mg - It is the agenda that they be given preferential treatment and special privileges based on their behavior and lifestyle, which is deliberately encouraged by the Left as part of their decades-long drive to destroy rules of morality that served as the "bricks" of Western civilization. Such lifestyle is looked down upon because it removes such people from the gene pool, i.e. does not produce children by natural means (a man and a woman).
@masculinity2007 youre thinking about things way too much when Its very simple, the attraction between man and woman is what makes life happen, therefore it is the only valid attraction. Homosexual attraction is an anomaly and the reason its so prevalent in western society is because the liberal media promotes it so much. But nonetheless, their attractions are not valid, because their role in the proper operation of life is not valid, and as i said, they are removed from the gene pool.
Autocrat ... I hate discussing things with faggots like you ... unless they learn to use proper vocabulary ... and words like homosexual attraction are completely a no no ...
Apart from that I can answer your stupid queer points again, although I've already done so. here goes ...
"youre thinking about things way too much when Its very simple,"
Its you mother fucker Christians and Westerners who have made simple things like human gender and sexuality so extremely complicated, when they're actually extremely simple.
"the attraction between man and woman is what makes life happen, therefore it is the only valid attraction."
1. If attraction between man and woman makes life happen, then attraction between man and man makes life worth living.
2. Anything which is meant to be good only in small quantities if taken to the extreme like sexuality between males and females in the West, it becomes evil, a sore, extremely harmful and immoral.
3. Nature has provided for only as much sexuality between males and females as much reproduction nature can endure without disrupting its balance ... but what would an unnatural people who have ruined mother earth and its delicate balance know about that ...
Male female sexuality amongst mammals in nature is only restricted to less than half of the males ... and in most of them its extremely transient, superficial in character, not constant or exclusive as in the western concept of 'heterosexuality' ... and only occurs once or twice in the entire life of the male, that too only towards the latter part of adulthood. Only about 12% of males have any significant amount of sexuality for females ... and even it is not an emotional bond.
Only an extremely few males, around 2-5% have an heterosexual orientation in mammals ... and these males are always, in 100% of cases, queer, transgendered ... females inside male bodies and these have also been pointed out by biologists (like Johann Roughgarden).
"Homosexual attraction is an anomaly and the reason its so prevalent in western society is because the liberal media promotes it so much."
1. That is where I'll agree with you. Homosexuality is a peculiarly western concept where sexuality of third genders for men is sold as 'men's sexuality for men' by Western society, media and by third gender themselves
2) ... otherwise the Western society would have no way to stigmatize, ridicule and discourage sexuality between real, straight men, in an otherwise open society.
Homosexuality is totally created and propagated by the western anti-man, queer forces and promoted by Western science and media. It's been created by them.
3) And its only so prevalent in the West. However, out in the non-West, sex between straight males is extremely common. Almost 100% of straight males not only indulge in it, depending on how non-Westernized/ non-artificially heterosexualized the society is -- but prefer men over women.
"But nonetheless, their attractions are not valid, because their role in the proper operation of life is not valid,"
Whether you're talking about men or the faggots ... anyone's attraction that occurs naturally is valid.
What is invalid is heterosexuality which is artificially created and enforced on manly males ... by brainwashing and conditioning them to be heterosexual, by killing off their sexuality for men and then diverting their sexuality towards women exclusively.
Your society, your religion, your science, everything is anti-nature, anti-men and invalid ... including your system of sexual apartheid called 'sexual orientation.'
"and as i said, they are removed from the gene pool."
The opinion of faggots don't count in front of real men.
What is the basis of your opinion in any case!!
Just like the evil you worship as god abused spirituality to punish sodomy (although, you distort it to say now that it punished sexuality between men) ... your science today abuse natural/ biolgoical facts to paint sexuality between males as an anomaly. The only thing that is an anomaly is your religion and your science.
I care a hoot if you're trying to be a mean ... you can be a drama queen to the hilt ... I don't mind queers telling me things, queers are my greatest enemies.
well your a complete idiot and im not reading a book just to try to figure out what makes you so stupid. Alls i saw was "straight men are gay" and thats when i stopped. you really need help
Your fucking Western society needs help. You can live in your queerdom for all I care. You seem to be a girly male yourself ...
To see males divided into 'homo-hetero' is a peculiarly 'third gender' trait ... and straight males don't believe in it at all ... they just pretend to, when gays force it on them ... but since you so much believe in it like the gays themselves, you must be a girly male yourself.
and wow is your brain messed up. real men are the best judges of attraction because straight men and women make the babies and sustain sustains human existance, gay men have buttsex and die off from the gene pool. They cannot measure the attractiveness of a woman because they dont want to mate with them, they want to be them.
"because straight men and women make the babies and sustain sustains human existance,"
Being straight about being a real man, as opposed to being a queer. And what makes a man straight is not his attraction for women -- indeed after reproductive sex, any attraction for women is queer. That is what you westerners need to relearn.
You don't need straight males to make babies. In fact, feminine, queer males can make babies more willingly. And straight males definitely are not made to bring up kids. That's outright queer!!
However, most societies require that as social duty of men.
2. Males with heterosexual orientation are not straight. Sure, your definitions make them so. But your definitions are wrong. Most real men are only forced to show a heterosexual orientation. It's contrary to manhood. Sure, a lot of them when its time for reproductive sex can have sex with women -- but an emotional orientation is not only queer, its non-essential for reproduction.
"gay men have buttsex and die off from the gene pool."
Gays are faggots!! they're not "men who like men." The western definitions are all messed up!!
Gays are as much of faggots as males who naturally have a heterosexual orientation. And both gays and these natural heterosexuals have a strong female inside them. And only they can judge females ... real men don't have a clue.
You know how much straight males hate when their wives ask them, "how do I look?"
Gays and males who naturally have a heterosexual orientation are both girly males/ intermediate sex/ females inside male bodies/ half-males+half-females ... they're not men.
Straight males don't naturally have a heterosexual orientation. They have to work extremely hard to get one ... because its unnatural for real men to have that kind of orientation. Many of them occasionally, feel the lust to do women. But that is not constant and certainly not exclusive.
STraight males are forced to be heterosexual by the West. Just as in the non-WEst, they're forced to get married and make and raise children.
Manhood is wrongly tied with making babies in the history of mankind. It was never tied to "desiring women." In fact, all real, manly societies, including most of the contemporary non-West and pre modern West, esp. Greek society, too much desire for vagina was seen as more effeminate than an exclusive desire for receptive anal sex.
and of course, which male can understand women better than the "third gender," -- so called homosexuals. because they are females inside male bodies. So, they are the best judge of female beauties.
"And may I ask, who are you to call them "whores"?"
That's a typical gay/ 'queer' statement. If you can call a man liking man a 'homo' why can't we (the non-Westerners) call sexually open women 'whores'.
In the olden West & current non-West, men called women who showed sexual interest in men 'whores' & discouraged them, but they never called male interest in men 'homo' (i.e. effeminate or 3rd gender or queer), Although, discouraged by the formal world, it was accepted as an integral part of being a man by straight males.
But in the queer Western society, its the other way round. Whores are given a respectable place in the mainstream & even celebrated & the pervert Christians support them whole heartedly, while, male bonds & intimacy is driven out of men's spaces & men are discouraged from even holding hands.
Not quite. To be heterosexual is to be attracted to the opposite gender. Fashion designers are gay because they were raised by single, feminist mothers who cannot understand why straight men don't like them. Gays hate women. How can they judge and pick the best woman when Gays hate them all? They can't. With your twisted logic, you'll say that only lesbians should judge male models because straight females cannot appreciate masculine qualities.
"To be geterosexual is to be attracted to the opposite gende." That's correct !
"Fashion designers are gay (no, all of them are not; but some of us gays are interested in fashion and hence choose it as our profession) because they were raised by single, feminist mothers (that's nonsense) who cannot understand why straight men don't like them." Well, I think straight men do like women and mothers, and many straight men like feminist women !
Only queers can stand feminist women, and gays and natural heterosexuals like you metargear are the ones who do so perfectly. That is why you talk of men being the same as women.
"Gays hate women." No, we don't - but we are attracted by men.
"How can they judge and pick the best woman when gays hate them all? They can't" Yes, we can ! Like I said, we don't hate women at all, and those of us who works with fashion can have a professional view.
""How can they judge and pick the best woman when gays hate them all? They can't" Yes, we can ! Like I said, we don't hate women at all, and those of us who works with fashion can have a professional view. "
What you just said contradicts your points that gays can have a "professional view" when the judge, who was a gay and was paid to be "fair", didn't support her because of what she said. What part of being fair can you find there?
There is no such thing as a hetero or a homo. They're a creation of modern West, and they're not even 'Christian.' Christianity asked you to get married as a social duty, not to have sexual lust for women, especially if you're not married to them. You're trying to hide your perversion behind Christianity.
Straight is actually about being a 'man' as opposite to being a 'third gender' or a 'feminine gendered male' ... its only wrongly redefined as 'heterosexual'; while 'gay' is actually about being a 'third gender', wrongly redefined by the Western politics of male gender and sexuality (manhood) as 'homosexual. And this wrong reallocation of social identities and spaces has resulted in this perverted situation that exists in the West, where men are even scared to hold eath other's hands.
There is no such thing as a 'sexual identity' -- the Western sexual identities are only the erstwhile 'gender identities' wrongly redefined. 'Sexuality' is actually only about 'gender.'
Thus its only the effeminate 'fags' who call themselves 'homosexuals' and they, rather, give a bad (well not actually bad, but feminine) name desire between men. However, desire between men is a universal male concept more prevalent amongst straights than gays.
In fact, a lot of males who call themselves straights only for their heterosexuality are actually 'gays'.
In any case, straight males (i.e real men/ masculine gendered, regular males) NEVER have a 'heterosexual orientation.' They may or may not have periodical sexual thing for women, but which is never all encompassing and it doesn't lend itself into emotional or social relationships. Any interest that men have in women is limited to wanting to fuck them, and its not universal or constant.
Only the feminine gendered males (and that includes gays and 'natural' heterosexuals) have an emotional and social attraction for women. The masculinity of straight males make them incompatible with women. In fact, men in traditional societies married only because of social pressures.
The Western society, systematically makes men heterosexual, and it requires queering them, mutilating their masculinity, everything that makes them a real man.
Real, naturally straight males (which means masculine, majority, regular guys, it doesn't mean 'heterosexual') never care for a woman's beauty or dress or even body. When they've an interest in women it never goes beyond the vagina, that too only as a 'hole' for penetrating. They have no real appreciation for a woman's body, or dressing sense or any of that stuff that beauty contests are made up of. On the other hand gays just relish doing that. That is why the gays want to be fashion designers.
Gays and women gel with each other so extremely well. Gays and women know each other's mind. Gays appreciate female beauty, the way the real straight males can't (only the 'naturally' heterosexual males wrongly calling themselves straight can). Straight males only pretend to like female beauty or to desire women emotionally, socially because Western fake manhood roles require them to. Just remove heterosexuality from Western manhood and you'll see how many straight males actually care for women.
Heterosexuality, like 'homosexuality' is only a social construct, not real. Heterosexuality is the western artirficial male gender/sexual role/ expectation. Nothing else.
Straight males cannot tolerate women's companies beyond a point. They run away from emotional bonds or from commitments. Only the quuer males care for these things. Straight males can't decide what dresses would suit on women. They can hardly care. No wonder that feminism and 'homosexual' movement goes hand in hand.
"Only the quuer males care for these things. Straight males can't decide what dresses would suit on women. They can hardly care. No wonder that feminism and 'homosexual' movement goes hand in hand. "
yeah. I agree with you that all males can't have a long lasting relationships(look at Clint Eastwood). It's not that we don't care, but it's because we respect their spaces. Is it healty relationship when a man tells woman what to do all the time? no. Women don't know what goes best with us, we do.
"I agree with you that all males can't have a long lasting relationships"
Correction. No real straight males can have relationships (whether lasting or not) with females if they really had a choice. It's not just a man's thing.
"It's not that we don't care,"
Please keep yourself out of manhood. Natural heterosexuals don't count as (straight) men. Straight is about being a real man, natural heterosexuals are gays, like the ones you're fighting here.
ah, so you're accusing all straight men of being perverts. Look around, you sicko(unless you live in San Fransicko or some weird country((that's a different story))). All the Gays I know hit on straight men and try to recruit them. Why? it's because they want to manipulate perfectly normal people. People born before 70's do appreciate each other's beauty. The barrier between men and feminism became weaker when the Gays and Liberals took over the Media and Hollywood.
"ah, so you're accusing all straight men of being perverts."
Well, the problem is you perverts view everything normal and natural as perversion. US is a wierdest country in the world.
If gays want to hit on straight men its only because they know that straight males are capable of responding sexually to males. So, sexuality is not the difference between straight and gay. Like I said, you're a heterosexual yet one of the gays.
lol, Savage rocks. Perez is a piece of sh*t - I don't care if he's gay but he deserves what he gets for his misogynistic comments toward Carrie just for saying the same thing as Obama did.
And letting Perez judge a beauty contest is a joke, has anyone seen what this guy looks like? You might as well let a 90lb skinny guy judge a bodybuilding contest.
Elvishairdude89 1 month ago
"I believe marriage is between a man and a woman" - Carrie Prejean
"I believe marriage is the union of a man and a woman" - Barack Obama
;)
Elvishairdude89 1 month ago
I think it was wrong that the Miss America contestant got reamed so bad because of her opinion, but to say that homos are responsible for everything bad that happens in America is fucking stupid. I usually can agree with Savage to an extent but sometimes I have to just tune him out.
AresCassell 3 months ago
Savage just dreams the US could go back to the 1950's. Sadly, globalization came through (which was especially accelerated by Reagan) and made his dream impossible to realize, thus the continual ranting on radio...
darwincity 9 months ago
HE'S GAY SO HE HATES WOMAN? WHAT A MORON. WHY DO GAY MEN MAKE SUCH GOOD HAIR STYLISTS AND DESIGNERS OF WOMEN'S CLOTHES THEN?
A GAY GUY CAN BE MORE OBJECTIVE ABOUT A WOMAN'S BEAUTY BECAUSE HE DOESNT WANNA HAVE SEX WITH THEM.ARE STRAIGHT WOMEN EXEMPT FROM JUDGING WOMAN'S BEAUTY TOO? SAVAGE IS A IDIOT. HE IS ANTI GAY WITH HIS FALLACIES CAUSE HE IS A SELF HATING BISEXUAL. LOOK IT UP HE USED SEND LOVE LETTERS TO ALAN GINSBERG.SAVAGE COME OUT OF THE CLOSET!
robaquarian 11 months ago
whatever a bender gets upto in their own home is their business, if it involves taking a cock up their jacksy and having bullbags in their mouth, then its a filthy business and they should all have their houses burnt down.
Asonofatroll 11 months ago
This guy may be abrasive, but he's essentially correct on every issue.
russellziske 1 year ago
@russellziske he's entitles to his opinions but he isn't entitled to his own facts. he lives in is mammalian brain half the time. gay men hate women? they can't judge a woman's beauty? that's pure fallacy. slippery slope logic. savage was wrong about wmds,marijuana, and many things. he has even recanted on many issues contradicting himself. if you thin he's right your not paying attention and you are not a critical thinker,just blindly accepting what the master savage tells you like a child.
robaquarian 11 months ago
@robaquarian incorrect, Einstein. I think for myself. I just happen to agree with him most of the time. Nice try, Maurice.
russellziske 10 months ago
@russellziske well then your mostly wrong cause savage is irrational. and suffers from a infiriority complex.
robaquarian 10 months ago
It is not uncommon for homosexuals to be found in such an avenue. Many gays work in the female fashion industry. Why? I dunno, maybe they are drawn to thinking about wearing such clothing.
evilunixuser1 1 year ago
Has any caller ever finished a sentence to this maniacal little fraud? Why would anyone diminish their integreity by even trying to reason with, or address this madman?
tracer740 1 year ago
@tracer740
Angry homosexual is angry.
Romansteel13 1 year ago
@Romansteel13- So you're angry, then what? You gonna stamp your foot and mince off in a huff?
tracer740 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@tracer740
Nah, could care less about you and your sexual proclivities.
You like getting fucked in the ass by other men, not my problem.
Romansteel13 1 year ago
@Romansteel13 - You needn't be angry that Savage is angry, he is always angry. He was raised under auspices of family heritage that embarrassed him and never catered to his strange and unorthodox illusions. He will never become normalized to the culture in which he lives and enjoys, but I don't think that he is an avowed homosexual, just severely recalcitrant and ungrounded.
tracer740 10 months ago
@tracer740
Why you so mad, kid?
Romansteel13 10 months ago
@Romansteel13 Huh? It appeared (from your earlier response) that you were angry (mad). I was just attempting to assuage your needless expression of contempt.
tracer740 10 months ago
@tracer740
It seems you have misunderstood me from a semantical approach.
I was referring to you, my Einsteinian friend.
You are the angry homosexual who despises Savage with a burning passion.
Good day.
Romansteel13 10 months ago
@Romansteel13 'WHO' was on first? LOL You have the audacity to characterize my sexuality and temperament without knowing me, basing those assessments on nothing other than your feeling offended by our divergent sentiments toward your 'hero' icon? ... and then you exhibit the temerity and bad taste to proffer a condescending and obsequious "Good day" as a closing expression of 'goodwill'?
No wonder you are resultant protege of this bitter and deranged talkshow personality.
tracer740 10 months ago
@tracer740
First he says
"You have the audacity to characterize my sexuality and temperament without knowing me."
Then the raving lunatic says.
"No wonder you are resultant protege of this bitter and deranged talkshow personality."
Oh, the delicious irony.
Pot, meet kettle.
I've never heard of Savage, I came across this video through a co-worker.
You should take your own advice, my wise professor once said, long before you were born.
When you assume, you make an ass out of yourself.
Romansteel13 10 months ago
@Romansteel13 HI TROLL!!!! XD Where you been?? Boy I've missed you :)
Can I ask, are you male or female today? Is your PhD in Psychiatry or Nuclear Physics today? Is your mother still from the Osaka region or are you another different nationality today?? LOL :)
tryandlisten 10 months ago
if you look at history almost all major wars and societal collapse was preceded by a period of gluttonous immoral behavior. The pendulum always swings back.
james7mmwby 1 year ago
this Leanne feels like were losing are freedom because Prez Hilton was a judge for miss USA.
What a fucking idiot!
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - We ARE losing our freedoms, bit by bit, to the tyranny of political correctness. The fact is that Hilton is a fat homosexual pervert who hates women, and who deliberately posed a loaded trick question to Ms. Prejean PRECISELY because of her (nominally) conservative Christian values. It is very likely because of their subsequent demonization of her that she became a pro-family activist.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 Don't preach about Tyranny cause like many Conservative hypocrites you just destroy the current fascist so you can built up your fascism.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - To you, ANYONE who stands for traditional values and the family is "fascist." No, YOU are the real fascist - a liberal fascist who only cares about advancing the agenda and nothing about the consequences of this agenda to society at large. Go back to San Francisco's Castro district and your S&M bondage sessions.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 "San Francisco's Castro district and your S&M bondage sessions."
You would know more about that then that then I would.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Also, in this year's Miss USA contestant a judge who is pro-open borders and pro-illegal immigration, asked Miss Oklahoma about her opinions on the Arizona SB 1070, again as a political litmus test. She supported their initiative - and the judge effectively disqualified her for consideration in winning the Miss USA pageant - which was won by a Lebanese Muslim Hezbollah supporter.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - The fact is that the Miss USA contest has become yet another star chamber to enforce political correctness and uniformity of thought, speech and behavior, like every other avenue of society today. Sorry, the only idiot here is you.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
She's also a so-called "pervert" (as Wiener would put it) because of her little whack off video tape. Some conservative.
Fuck this bitch!
jons44 1 year ago
@jons44 - So you take the side of a fat homosexual pervert who set her up, because you don't like her views on marriage, you foul-mouthed, sexist, woman-hating, misogynistic piece of trash? Who's your idea of an "ideal" woman - Nancy Pelosi? Barbara Boxer? Janet Napolitano? Elena Kagan? You wouldn't speak that way of any of the Hollyweird leftist wackjobs like Ellen "Juno" Page or Marion Cotillard (a 9/11 truther, B.T.W.), would you? Let alone Miley Cyrus who's been totally corrupted by PC?
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 Don't get me wrong. I don't have a problem with how she feels about marrige. I also don't have a problem with women jerking off on video. I love porn. What I don't like is people who hide who they really are. Of course Hollywood is full of judgemental people. Fuck Hollywood. But how do you call you call yourself a conservative and have a video like that floating around? So fuck her too.
jons44 1 year ago
@jons44 - The media leaked that video as retribution for her not following the politically correct doxies about marriage. They, like the Obama gang, have been fully schooled in the Saul Alinsky tactics of personal destruction. And the Miss USA pageant is similarly stacked against any other contestant who doesn't bow down to PC dogmas - as when Miss Oklahoma lost a chance at the crown due to her supporting Arizona's immigration initiatives, while her questioner took the side of the La Raza crowd.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 "The media leaked that video as retribution for her not following the politically correct doxies about marriage."
And what proof do you have to back that paranoid claim?
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Typical loaded question from a depraved, degenerate, deviant mind. You are evidently against the family and traditional values and common decency/morality, otherwise you wouldn't be taking the side of perverts against upstanding people. You AGREE with this campaign of personal destruction against anyone that goes by biblical and societal rather than political correctness, or otherwise you wouldn't be asking that type of loaded question.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
Comment removed
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 How is it a loaded question?
Is it cause you really don't know what your talking about?
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Your spurious assumptions that border on slander have no place here - and nor do you. What planet do you live on (never mind what world)?
wmbrown6 1 year ago
Comment removed
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Your questions are about as legitimate as a three-dollar bill - in short, not at all. I WON'T answer any of your loaded questions because it's evident you're trying to trap me (as you do to anyone who doesn't agree with your ideology).
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 you're just avoiding the question because despite your post which Btw are utterly pretentious and condescending your views have no real merit.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Wrong. Your question does not deserve any consideration because to you, anything having to do with traditional values, the family, and preserving the institution of marriage as between a man and a woman is "paranoid." Among those who agree with your types are judicial activist elitists who have a proclivity for overruling the will of the people time and again, and imposing their will on everyone by fiat.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 You opinions are so entertaining, forget that their not saltire.
Wmbrowm, you ceaselessly prattle about bleary Family Values although I would speculate you have no real understanding of it. Wht you refust to realize is that
Family Values are not under assault by same sex Marriage or Liberal elitism.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Oh, anything that has to do with tradition and family values is "entertaining" in your warped, twisted, perverted, depraved "opinion." Your denials of reality, in fact, are NOT funny. By your denials, in fact you SUPPORT such an assault on the family by the radical Left and the militant "gay" activists.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 keep preaching about you about "family values" Troll.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - That's a problem with someone like you, anyone who supports the family and traditional values is automatically a "troll" to someone like you who are evidently against both.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 Your a Troll, Cause nobody can be that stupid to just assume that.
however, just out of curiously what do you consider to be the correct traditional and family values?
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Since you are so anti-family and pro-depravity, your loaded question deserves no answer whatsoever. Not to mention your automatic assumption that anyone standing up for traditional values is a "troll." Not to mention your smug, arrogant, haughty, condescending, elitist sense of superiority to everyone else to stereotype anyone who disagrees with you as "stupid."
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - But historically and societally, marriage is MEANT as between one man and one woman, for the purpose of producing children in order to keep the society alive (whereas two men or two women CANNOT bear children). The Left has been at war with sexual morals and especially traditional values since the 1960's. Among their weapons have been "free love," pornography, homosexuality - and, in recent years, this phony "gay marriage" racket.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 you have a right to your views but I still have to disagree with you. if you believe that marriage is about having children why aren't we denying marriage to couples that can't have children?
their not keeping the society alive but we don't deny them the rights to marriage?
I believe that marriage between two consenting adult is perfectly fine with me and from research I've done it doesn't cause social decline.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - You see, you have clearly been indoctrinated by the cult of moral relativism and equivalence. This has nothing whatsoever to do with civil rights. It has everything to do with the culture of licentiousness and "if it feels good, do it in the road," and with a group of people living an "alternative lifestyle" putting their own adult desires above the interests of the children. Every society that has given a seal of approval to this insanity has seen native populations decline...
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 "Every society that has given a seal of approval to this insanity has seen native populations decline..."
the actual reason most countries are seeing a decline in their population is due mostly to the standers of living have been getting better and life expectancy is rising. also, typically the countries that are having a low birth are usually more educated as well.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Don't you mean, people's standard of living becoming such that: a) they have a sense of entitlement, that the world somehow owes them something, and b) they have way too much time on their hands, indulging in behaviors that are destructive to both them and society. A good portion of the high costs of medical care are related to treatment for AIDS and other sexual diseases.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
(CONT'D) ...while importing foreign populaces that have no loyalty to the country, and indeed are openly hostile to the society and seek to impose their own culture. In Europe, for example, the pushing of homosexuality has led to a decline in fertility rates per family to less than 2 (and some even bordering on 1), while Muslims who do not live any decadent lifestyles reproduce anywhere from 5 to 10 times the rate of natural-born populations. This plus the push for illegal-alien amnesty...
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 And like I said before You see low birth rates with educated and you see the opposite with the uneducated.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Correction: Low birth rates among liberal leftists and secular atheists who are more selfishly concerned with themselves and their own pursuit of pleasure than of continuing the cycle of a community. The only "uneducated" I know of are those from Third World and Middle Eastern countries who knock off children like Taystee Bread. Also, families and traditional values have been increasingly denigrated by Hollywood and the media since the 1960's, and this has taken a toll.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 I've alway notice that in any of are dissections you alway seem to want turn the topic back to your obsession with sexual perversion.
You know what they say "Bad Men Do What Good Men Dream."
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Correction. It is the Left that seeks to glorify sexual perversion and call it "freedom." I'm simply exposing the Left's sordid history of licentiousness. "Dr." Alfred Kinsey (one of the "fathers" of the sexual revolution), for example, was a sexual pervert - as were all his associates who worked with him on his various "studies."
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6
still posting about sexual perversion again just come out of the closet already.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - This is typical of the radical Left - smear someone's private life if they dare speak out for the family and traditional values.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 I knew you where going to say that but your not fooling anybody.
come out of the closet already.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
Wrong, you yourself are a de facto pervert by taking the side of those that seek to radically redefine marriage to suit their own lifestyle and adult desires, at the expense of the children and the continuation of a society. Your intrusive and invasive baiting will not work, so you can just stop it right there. Furthermore, do you support polygamy? Group marriage? Bestiality? And if not, why are you so narrow-minded in that realm? It's ALL about preferential treatment and special privileges.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 Just come out of the closet.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Quit with your slanderous smears, you perverted, corrupt vermin. Your corrupted mind is indicative of the life you live.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 "slanderous smears" a little hypocritical you think?
Your the kind of smug imbecile that if you cannot win an argument, instead you throw Ad hominem attacks.slander do not affect me, cause, I know who I am.
I also know what the motives are of the people that do it.
So wmbrown6, it's a new age, you do not have to hide it anymore just come out of the closet already.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - To you, anyone who challenges your indoctrinated political correctness is an "imbecile." Just because "the times" have changed does not mean that societal mores that have been in place for millennia should just be discarded like an old, crumpled tissue. What is at play here is a cabal of radical special-interest groups seeking to upend all moral standards to suit their "anything goes" / "if it feels good, do it in the road" ethos.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
Comment removed
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Let us also remember that the filthy judge that tossed out and completely nullified and invalidated the votes of 7 million Californians in the 2008 election is an avowed, open homosexual whose lifestyle dictates his entire worldview on the issues at hand. This is someone whose private life DOES matter and DOES have disastrous implications for the society at large.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 Wrong, the so call Vote was bullshit (even-though voting is a trick to make the peasants of feel likes their in control!)and if we ever allowed people to vote on what rights a "minority" has we would still have slavery in America,so I could care less THE VOTERS. beside, the American voter is a complete dishonest,stupid,self-serving dick anyway.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg also, it obvious that you have no real proof to back your paranoid claims and it show in your writings.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Listen, punk, you have no basis to support any of YOUR dogmas, other than what the leftist media put in your stupid head. I go by empirical evidence. You go by what propaganda a bunch of radical activists only concerned with their own selfish pursuit of pleasure spew forth. The American Psychiatric Association, for example, has been totally taken over by the radical homosexual mafia.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 Call me what ever I know it's all nonsense any way.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - YOU are nonsense ALL the way. Go peddle your junk at the Daily Kos or Huffington Post where there'll be mindless zombies who'll agree with your rambling rants and support for the forces of decadence and licentiousness.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 It obvious that you don't know what your talking about.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - It's obvious that you're an illiterate nobody who can't even spell to save your life. To you, ANYONE who has a concrete values system based on millennia of history "doesn't know what they're talking about," because you're of the morally relativist, "anything goes" / "if it feels good, do it in the road" school.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 And still you don't know what your talking about.
If you did, you wouldn't be posting the over the top bile you would actually have some fact to back up you crap with.
And if I misspell any words my bad, at least I don't peruse online thesauruses in a sorry attempt to "class up" my ignorant hick babble.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Wrong. I have every right to call out anyone who is a drone of the radical Left and the sexual licentiousness lobby. It is those people (including, obviously, you) who think any such calling out is "over the top bile." Go look up studies PROVING that children raised in a family with a mom and a dad end up more well-adjusted and prosperous than those raised by single moms or in "families" with two men or two women. I won't hold your putrid hand.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - And also, you snot-nosed, stuck-up city slicker elitist who has contempt for anyone who isn't like them, your vulgar, derogatory stereotypes of middle Americans are no different than using the "N"-word for African-Americans. I live in the REAL world, punk. You live in a little ivory-tower existence, looking down on anyone who doesn't bow down to your little political correctness WHICH IS WHAT IS PUSHING THE DRIVE TO RADICALLY REDEFINE MARRIAGE TO MEAN ANYTHING ANYONE WANTS.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6what who dares to insult my Ivory tower, You bow down at once!
The fact f the matter isn't that I'm as you put it " You live in a little ivory-tower existence, looking down on anyone who doesn't bow down to your little political correctness" the fact of the matter is that your just some looser look for a scapegoat to blame for your problems.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Just shut up with that haughty, arrogant, condescending attitude of yours. Your slanderous presumptions of anyone who dares challenge you clearly borders on the defamatory. Why don't you get out of here and peddle your junk at Daily Kos or HuffPo if you want brain-dead zombies who uncritically and unquestioningly agree with every last one of your little dogmas. Your attitude IS the problem here, and your slurs of anybody who challenges you as "losers" underscores your disdain.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
Comment removed
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 Btw Haughty and Arrogant Cancel each other out cause they mean the same thing, dumbshit.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - That arrogant attitude is typical and proof you ARE an adherent to the PC dogmas of the radical Left. Besides, African-Americans see such specious comparisons of their struggles of the past - which were real enough - to a bunch of perverts demanding preferential treatment and special privileges and the total overhauling of societal mores to suit them. It's obvious that to you, the voter is "stupid" if they don't bow down to the media's elitist agenda.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
Make that: African-Americans see such specious comparisons of their struggles of the past - which were real enough - to a bunch of perverts demanding preferential treatment and special privileges and the total overhauling of societal mores to suit them, as reprehensible and insulting. One black preacher even said, "Don't compare your sin to my skin."
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - And speaking of African-Americans, do you consider THEM "stupid"? 70% of them in California voted to maintain the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman (and these were people who by and large voted for Obama). It is a bunch of radical social engineers and militant activists seeking to redefine such an institution to render it essentially meaningless.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - You do not give a d*** about the children, or the future development of our society. You only care about the selfish desires of a tiny radical fringe minority, to wit: 1% of the population essentially out to dictate moral standards for the remaining 99%.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - And let me remind you, you are operating on specious, false, slanderous assumptions about the motives of those who question and challenge you. You think EVERYBODY should knuckle under and bend down to your will (which, in truth, is the will of the radical Left) on the matter of sexual morals, which the Left has been at war against for the last 4+ decades, in their bid to destroy the family which to them stands in the way of their imposing their utopian vision on the world.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - Because it has NOTHING to do with so-called "equality" - and EVERYTHING to do with the selfish quest for sexual gratification. From Point #26 of the Communist goals of 1963: "Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as 'natural, normal, [and] healthy." Point #25: "Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV." And so on.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
(CONT'D) ...will have the effect of making white Anglos a minority in their own country within 50 years. So yes, "gay" marriage DOES have disastrous consequences for the society at large. The "research" you have read was rigged and paid for by the homosexual lobby in order to advance their Bacchanalian agenda and hoodwink those who place blind trust in science that has been sadly politicized in this and some other countries.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
And let me clarify about "the push for illegal-alien amnesty" part, for lack of space: Also, the uncontrolled immigration since 1965 of Third Worlders and people from the Middle East and central America who have been encouraged NOT to assimilate into our culture, but instead have been encouraged to live in their own little world, to the point where they are imposing their own customs and values on this country via political correctness. And those people, too, have large families, unlike us.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@jons44 - One can argue till the cows come home about whether even women who enter beauty pageants could be considered "conservative." But in the politically correct world of today, taking a stand that is counter to what the secular leftist elites are pushing is enough to open you to being personally destroyed or your life put in mortal danger.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 The god-fearing, corporate, right wing elites are just as guilty. I don't want to be told what to think or how to feel from either side. I don't have to accept anything or anyone if I choose not too. I don't have to accept the homosexual agenda but I don't have to be a so-called "patriot" either. I have no "side". I think both the left and right peddle their bullshit.
jons44 1 year ago
@jons44 - The point is this: If she had knuckled under to the political correctness that Perez Hilton had demanded by his loaded question which was deliberately selected, we would never had heard of that tape. That is the issue, at the end of the day.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 Okay. I agree. If there's one thing that I respect from anyone, it's honesty about one's principles For that I give her credit. And yes, that really is the issue in this case. All I'm saying is that a lot conservatives like to throw that "pervert" word around a lot. I'm mean, these days, if you're gonna take the moral high ground, you better not have any skeletons in your closet because someone is gonna dig that shit up.
jons44 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 I guess what I'm saying is that my rant is more towards preachy uber moral people that it is about Carrie Prejean. But hey, people are gonna attack you for your opinions in this society no matter what you say today.
jons44 1 year ago
@jons44 - What's more, the radical leftist politically correct media blurted out that video and other aspects of her personal life as retribution for her being pro-family and pro-traditional values. They have no tolerance for any other viewpoint other than her own - and obviously, neither do you. Notice the media is silent about Barney Frank's personal life (and all his boyfriends) because he's a flaming leftist who supports the anti-family, pro-sodomite agenda.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
"He's a piece of human waste with eyes." Is Savage the best, or what?
guyNbluejeans 1 year ago
I wonder if Dr Savage thinks that women should be allowed to judge women on beauty contests? If that be the case, then would he prefer that homosexual women judge female contestants, if having sexual feelings for someone is important to judge that person in beauty contests.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
michael they are not gay they are faggots. the snappster
valvenis30 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
michael they are not gay they are faggots. the snappster
valvenis30 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
michael they are not gay they are faggots. the snappster
valvenis30 1 year ago
@valvenis30 Same thing. Gay and faggots are the same thing. And so are the males who are born heterosexuals -- they're as much of faggots. And both of them -- gays and natural heterosexuals -- i.e., the bunch of faggots are the only people besides women who can really appreciate feminine beauty. The straights have no natural inclination to understand femininity or judge it. A straight male can only judge a contest on masculinity -- say, a wrestling match.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
michael they are not gay they are faggots. the snappster
valvenis30 1 year ago
How did she lose her freedom of speech.
Was she arrested after she said what she said, No she wasn't! so she didn't lose any of her rights.
But idiots like Savage and this calling are so stupid and insecure that they lead you to believe in a phony Gay Conspiracies when the truth is they are the true conspirators trying to destroy steal yours and every body else freedom in America!
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg They took away her crown and made her life miserable! Don't tell me they didn't do anything to her!
lexaeus88 1 year ago
@lexaeus88 Well, buy her a coloring book that may cheer her ass up.
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - To you, anyone who supports traditional values and the family is "stupid" because you are an amoral, depraved degenerate who lives a life of sin and iniquity, to such an extent that you've come to hate G-d and His rules for morality. By taking the side of those who seek to radically redefine the institution of marriage to suit their own perverted lifestyle and denigrating those taking a stand for the family and traditional values, you are therefore part of the problem.
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@wmbrown6 Answer me how are Gays a threat to "traditional values"?
Harlock4mg 1 year ago
@Harlock4mg - It is the agenda that they be given preferential treatment and special privileges based on their behavior and lifestyle, which is deliberately encouraged by the Left as part of their decades-long drive to destroy rules of morality that served as the "bricks" of Western civilization. Such lifestyle is looked down upon because it removes such people from the gene pool, i.e. does not produce children by natural means (a man and a woman).
wmbrown6 1 year ago
@masculinity2007 youre thinking about things way too much when Its very simple, the attraction between man and woman is what makes life happen, therefore it is the only valid attraction. Homosexual attraction is an anomaly and the reason its so prevalent in western society is because the liberal media promotes it so much. But nonetheless, their attractions are not valid, because their role in the proper operation of life is not valid, and as i said, they are removed from the gene pool.
autocrat111 1 year ago
Autocrat ... I hate discussing things with faggots like you ... unless they learn to use proper vocabulary ... and words like homosexual attraction are completely a no no ...
Apart from that I can answer your stupid queer points again, although I've already done so. here goes ...
masculinity2007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"youre thinking about things way too much when Its very simple,"
Its you mother fucker Christians and Westerners who have made simple things like human gender and sexuality so extremely complicated, when they're actually extremely simple.
"the attraction between man and woman is what makes life happen, therefore it is the only valid attraction."
1. If attraction between man and woman makes life happen, then attraction between man and man makes life worth living.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
2. Anything which is meant to be good only in small quantities if taken to the extreme like sexuality between males and females in the West, it becomes evil, a sore, extremely harmful and immoral.
3. Nature has provided for only as much sexuality between males and females as much reproduction nature can endure without disrupting its balance ... but what would an unnatural people who have ruined mother earth and its delicate balance know about that ...
masculinity2007 1 year ago
3 contd ...
Male female sexuality amongst mammals in nature is only restricted to less than half of the males ... and in most of them its extremely transient, superficial in character, not constant or exclusive as in the western concept of 'heterosexuality' ... and only occurs once or twice in the entire life of the male, that too only towards the latter part of adulthood. Only about 12% of males have any significant amount of sexuality for females ... and even it is not an emotional bond.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
3 contd ...
Only an extremely few males, around 2-5% have an heterosexual orientation in mammals ... and these males are always, in 100% of cases, queer, transgendered ... females inside male bodies and these have also been pointed out by biologists (like Johann Roughgarden).
masculinity2007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Homosexual attraction is an anomaly and the reason its so prevalent in western society is because the liberal media promotes it so much."
1. That is where I'll agree with you. Homosexuality is a peculiarly western concept where sexuality of third genders for men is sold as 'men's sexuality for men' by Western society, media and by third gender themselves
masculinity2007 1 year ago
2) ... otherwise the Western society would have no way to stigmatize, ridicule and discourage sexuality between real, straight men, in an otherwise open society.
Homosexuality is totally created and propagated by the western anti-man, queer forces and promoted by Western science and media. It's been created by them.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
3) And its only so prevalent in the West. However, out in the non-West, sex between straight males is extremely common. Almost 100% of straight males not only indulge in it, depending on how non-Westernized/ non-artificially heterosexualized the society is -- but prefer men over women.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
"But nonetheless, their attractions are not valid, because their role in the proper operation of life is not valid,"
Whether you're talking about men or the faggots ... anyone's attraction that occurs naturally is valid.
What is invalid is heterosexuality which is artificially created and enforced on manly males ... by brainwashing and conditioning them to be heterosexual, by killing off their sexuality for men and then diverting their sexuality towards women exclusively.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
Your society, your religion, your science, everything is anti-nature, anti-men and invalid ... including your system of sexual apartheid called 'sexual orientation.'
masculinity2007 1 year ago
"and as i said, they are removed from the gene pool."
The opinion of faggots don't count in front of real men.
What is the basis of your opinion in any case!!
Just like the evil you worship as god abused spirituality to punish sodomy (although, you distort it to say now that it punished sexuality between men) ... your science today abuse natural/ biolgoical facts to paint sexuality between males as an anomaly. The only thing that is an anomaly is your religion and your science.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
if you really want anyone to read what your writing, post a comment, not a thesis
autocrat111 1 year ago
all losers say that ... you need to say something ...
masculinity2007 1 year ago
@masculinity2007 Said the reprobate.
lexaeus88 1 year ago
@lexaeus88 Christians are so engrossed with themselves. They think they follow god. But they follow the satan.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
you sound like a schizophrenic lunatic.. and im not trying to be mean... you really sound mentally ill
autocrat111 1 year ago
@ autocrat,
I care a hoot if you're trying to be a mean ... you can be a drama queen to the hilt ... I don't mind queers telling me things, queers are my greatest enemies.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
well your a complete idiot and im not reading a book just to try to figure out what makes you so stupid. Alls i saw was "straight men are gay" and thats when i stopped. you really need help
autocrat111 1 year ago
Your fucking Western society needs help. You can live in your queerdom for all I care. You seem to be a girly male yourself ...
To see males divided into 'homo-hetero' is a peculiarly 'third gender' trait ... and straight males don't believe in it at all ... they just pretend to, when gays force it on them ... but since you so much believe in it like the gays themselves, you must be a girly male yourself.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
And no, I never said straights are gay. You're gay. Girly males are gay. Go and judge females for all I care!!! leave alone straights!!
masculinity2007 1 year ago
Any male which has an appreciation for the female beauty is a faggot, not straight, the Western definitions notwithstanding.
Real straight men have no use or appreciation of female beauty, but they only see females as holes to penetrate, and they're only one of the options.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
@masculinity2007 wow masculinity get some friends to talk to
and wow is your brain messed up. real men are the best judges of attraction because straight men and women make the babies and sustain sustains human existance, gay men have buttsex and die off from the gene pool. They cannot measure the attractiveness of a woman because they dont want to mate with them, they want to be them.
autocrat111 1 year ago
"and wow is your brain messed up."
No. Your manhood is all messed up!
"real men are the best judges of attraction"
Yes. But there are hardly any real men in the West left now!! They've all been heterosexualized/ homosexualized.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
"because straight men and women make the babies and sustain sustains human existance,"
Being straight about being a real man, as opposed to being a queer. And what makes a man straight is not his attraction for women -- indeed after reproductive sex, any attraction for women is queer. That is what you westerners need to relearn.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
contd ...
You don't need straight males to make babies. In fact, feminine, queer males can make babies more willingly. And straight males definitely are not made to bring up kids. That's outright queer!!
However, most societies require that as social duty of men.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
2. Males with heterosexual orientation are not straight. Sure, your definitions make them so. But your definitions are wrong. Most real men are only forced to show a heterosexual orientation. It's contrary to manhood. Sure, a lot of them when its time for reproductive sex can have sex with women -- but an emotional orientation is not only queer, its non-essential for reproduction.
Reproduction is a feminine trait in any case!!
masculinity2007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"gay men have buttsex and die off from the gene pool."
Gays are faggots!! they're not "men who like men." The western definitions are all messed up!!
Gays are as much of faggots as males who naturally have a heterosexual orientation. And both gays and these natural heterosexuals have a strong female inside them. And only they can judge females ... real men don't have a clue.
You know how much straight males hate when their wives ask them, "how do I look?"
masculinity2007 1 year ago
Gays and males who naturally have a heterosexual orientation are both girly males/ intermediate sex/ females inside male bodies/ half-males+half-females ... they're not men.
Straight males don't naturally have a heterosexual orientation. They have to work extremely hard to get one ... because its unnatural for real men to have that kind of orientation. Many of them occasionally, feel the lust to do women. But that is not constant and certainly not exclusive.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
On the other hand, a desire for men is a constant and universal trait of real men. And, I'm not talking about gays, who are faggots who like men.
I'm talking about straights who like men.
Straight means 'manly' not 'heterosexual.'
masculinity2007 1 year ago
STraight males are forced to be heterosexual by the West. Just as in the non-WEst, they're forced to get married and make and raise children.
Manhood is wrongly tied with making babies in the history of mankind. It was never tied to "desiring women." In fact, all real, manly societies, including most of the contemporary non-West and pre modern West, esp. Greek society, too much desire for vagina was seen as more effeminate than an exclusive desire for receptive anal sex.
masculinity2007 1 year ago
and of course, which male can understand women better than the "third gender," -- so called homosexuals. because they are females inside male bodies. So, they are the best judge of female beauties.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
I hope the people hear realise that the way youtube has been constructed, the comments have to be read, the last one first.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
A whore is biblically sound. Yeah ... way to go you pervert Christians!!
masculinity2007 2 years ago
And may I ask, who are you to call them "whores"?
metargear123 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"And may I ask, who are you to call them "whores"?"
That's a typical gay/ 'queer' statement. If you can call a man liking man a 'homo' why can't we (the non-Westerners) call sexually open women 'whores'.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
In the olden West & current non-West, men called women who showed sexual interest in men 'whores' & discouraged them, but they never called male interest in men 'homo' (i.e. effeminate or 3rd gender or queer), Although, discouraged by the formal world, it was accepted as an integral part of being a man by straight males.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
But in the queer Western society, its the other way round. Whores are given a respectable place in the mainstream & even celebrated & the pervert Christians support them whole heartedly, while, male bonds & intimacy is driven out of men's spaces & men are discouraged from even holding hands.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
Not quite. To be heterosexual is to be attracted to the opposite gender. Fashion designers are gay because they were raised by single, feminist mothers who cannot understand why straight men don't like them. Gays hate women. How can they judge and pick the best woman when Gays hate them all? They can't. With your twisted logic, you'll say that only lesbians should judge male models because straight females cannot appreciate masculine qualities.
metargear123 2 years ago
@ metargear123 (part 1 of 2):
Not quite.
"To be geterosexual is to be attracted to the opposite gende." That's correct !
"Fashion designers are gay (no, all of them are not; but some of us gays are interested in fashion and hence choose it as our profession) because they were raised by single, feminist mothers (that's nonsense) who cannot understand why straight men don't like them." Well, I think straight men do like women and mothers, and many straight men like feminist women !
Nostalgikern 2 years ago
"many straight men like feminist women !"
Then why do you suppose that their relationshits can't last long? why do women always ask for divorce first?
metargear123 2 years ago
Real men never want relationships with women. Even a fool knows that.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
Only queers can stand feminist women, and gays and natural heterosexuals like you metargear are the ones who do so perfectly. That is why you talk of men being the same as women.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
@ metargear123 (part 2 of 2):
Not quite.
"Gays hate women." No, we don't - but we are attracted by men.
"How can they judge and pick the best woman when gays hate them all? They can't" Yes, we can ! Like I said, we don't hate women at all, and those of us who works with fashion can have a professional view.
Nostalgikern 2 years ago
""How can they judge and pick the best woman when gays hate them all? They can't" Yes, we can ! Like I said, we don't hate women at all, and those of us who works with fashion can have a professional view. "
What you just said contradicts your points that gays can have a "professional view" when the judge, who was a gay and was paid to be "fair", didn't support her because of what she said. What part of being fair can you find there?
metargear123 2 years ago
There is no such thing as a hetero or a homo. They're a creation of modern West, and they're not even 'Christian.' Christianity asked you to get married as a social duty, not to have sexual lust for women, especially if you're not married to them. You're trying to hide your perversion behind Christianity.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
Straight is actually about being a 'man' as opposite to being a 'third gender' or a 'feminine gendered male' ... its only wrongly redefined as 'heterosexual'; while 'gay' is actually about being a 'third gender', wrongly redefined by the Western politics of male gender and sexuality (manhood) as 'homosexual. And this wrong reallocation of social identities and spaces has resulted in this perverted situation that exists in the West, where men are even scared to hold eath other's hands.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
There is no such thing as a 'sexual identity' -- the Western sexual identities are only the erstwhile 'gender identities' wrongly redefined. 'Sexuality' is actually only about 'gender.'
Thus its only the effeminate 'fags' who call themselves 'homosexuals' and they, rather, give a bad (well not actually bad, but feminine) name desire between men. However, desire between men is a universal male concept more prevalent amongst straights than gays.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
In fact, a lot of males who call themselves straights only for their heterosexuality are actually 'gays'.
In any case, straight males (i.e real men/ masculine gendered, regular males) NEVER have a 'heterosexual orientation.' They may or may not have periodical sexual thing for women, but which is never all encompassing and it doesn't lend itself into emotional or social relationships. Any interest that men have in women is limited to wanting to fuck them, and its not universal or constant.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
Only the feminine gendered males (and that includes gays and 'natural' heterosexuals) have an emotional and social attraction for women. The masculinity of straight males make them incompatible with women. In fact, men in traditional societies married only because of social pressures.
The Western society, systematically makes men heterosexual, and it requires queering them, mutilating their masculinity, everything that makes them a real man.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
Real, naturally straight males (which means masculine, majority, regular guys, it doesn't mean 'heterosexual') never care for a woman's beauty or dress or even body. When they've an interest in women it never goes beyond the vagina, that too only as a 'hole' for penetrating. They have no real appreciation for a woman's body, or dressing sense or any of that stuff that beauty contests are made up of. On the other hand gays just relish doing that. That is why the gays want to be fashion designers.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
Gays and women gel with each other so extremely well. Gays and women know each other's mind. Gays appreciate female beauty, the way the real straight males can't (only the 'naturally' heterosexual males wrongly calling themselves straight can). Straight males only pretend to like female beauty or to desire women emotionally, socially because Western fake manhood roles require them to. Just remove heterosexuality from Western manhood and you'll see how many straight males actually care for women.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
Heterosexuality, like 'homosexuality' is only a social construct, not real. Heterosexuality is the western artirficial male gender/sexual role/ expectation. Nothing else.
Straight males cannot tolerate women's companies beyond a point. They run away from emotional bonds or from commitments. Only the quuer males care for these things. Straight males can't decide what dresses would suit on women. They can hardly care. No wonder that feminism and 'homosexual' movement goes hand in hand.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
"Only the quuer males care for these things. Straight males can't decide what dresses would suit on women. They can hardly care. No wonder that feminism and 'homosexual' movement goes hand in hand. "
yeah. I agree with you that all males can't have a long lasting relationships(look at Clint Eastwood). It's not that we don't care, but it's because we respect their spaces. Is it healty relationship when a man tells woman what to do all the time? no. Women don't know what goes best with us, we do.
metargear123 2 years ago
"I agree with you that all males can't have a long lasting relationships"
Correction. No real straight males can have relationships (whether lasting or not) with females if they really had a choice. It's not just a man's thing.
"It's not that we don't care,"
Please keep yourself out of manhood. Natural heterosexuals don't count as (straight) men. Straight is about being a real man, natural heterosexuals are gays, like the ones you're fighting here.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
"Women don't know what goes best with us, we do. "
Funny to hear such a statement from a faggot!
masculinity2007 2 years ago
ah, so you're accusing all straight men of being perverts. Look around, you sicko(unless you live in San Fransicko or some weird country((that's a different story))). All the Gays I know hit on straight men and try to recruit them. Why? it's because they want to manipulate perfectly normal people. People born before 70's do appreciate each other's beauty. The barrier between men and feminism became weaker when the Gays and Liberals took over the Media and Hollywood.
metargear123 2 years ago
"ah, so you're accusing all straight men of being perverts."
Well, the problem is you perverts view everything normal and natural as perversion. US is a wierdest country in the world.
If gays want to hit on straight men its only because they know that straight males are capable of responding sexually to males. So, sexuality is not the difference between straight and gay. Like I said, you're a heterosexual yet one of the gays.
masculinity2007 2 years ago
There are no normal people left in a society where men have to have relationships with women to be allowed the male identity. Sicko!!!
masculinity2007 2 years ago