Added: 2 years ago
From: R3APERvsTYETREE
Views: 206,446
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,255)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • FarCry is made with CryEngine.....

  • crysis 3 or one i dont know pls dont kill me

  • THE SDK IS FREE!!!! :D

  • THUMBS UP IF U THINK CRYTEK ENGHIN WAS USED IN CRYSIS 2 and FarCry3 beacause the fact that they had word 'cry'!

    and thumbs down if u think CAPSLOCK SUX!

    XD!

  • @avikbelllic911 notsureiftrollorjuststupid.jpg

    farcry 3 is made in dunia engine retard

  • I kinda wish crysis 2 was in a jungle and had a better story. It's still a good game but this presentation looks better that the actual Crysis 2 to me.

  • I guess you must have a badass pc for this!

  • @MarcoTheHedgehog96 No not really dude...I mean they got this game to look so good even on console...I'm busy with Crysis 2 at the moment on pc and I don't even have a spectacular pc..2.2Ghz Core duo,Foxconn 45gmx motherboard,ATI HD5670 and 4 gigs of DDR2 600mhz...so i have a budget rig and it can run crysis at "Gamer" settings which equivalent to high settings

  • @XxGnomeNinjaxX3 dont underestimate hd5670s. plug 2 in crossfire and you got decent power under your hand.

  • бля заебок))))

  • I like that description!

  • this is not Cryengine 3

  • crysis should of stayed on pc consoles suck ass and is holding pc back

  • @fuge805 Jsut because they dont haveh te best graphics does'nt mean they suck moron.

  • @amartinez97 quit bitching and go play some fucking halo loser

  • @fuge805 No you quit talking shit about my perfectly fine machines, dick.

  • @amartinez97 you didnt make the machines Microsoft and sony, did i highly doubt that you have anywhere near the mental capabilities to create one . . . you seem easy to please being entertained by dolls

  • @fuge805 I never claimed i made them.

  • Waterfall was beautiful.

  • fuck you crytek for not putting this on xbox!

  • @spacemarine131 Fuck off and get a pc, consoles are a stepback

  • What is that rifle called at 0:21, it's very sexy

  • Whers the trees at 0:27

  • That video are not yours faker! 

  • @TheBora50 Nob who said it was mine?

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE lol not nob "noob"

  • @TheBora50 No Nob you idiot not noob, Nob = Dick or cock

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE Nice. You can mis-spell noob and define 'nob' on google to see if it is a actual word.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE haha owned

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE faggot

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE you did when you uploaded them and ticked that box..

  • honestly, I can't find a distinct difference from cry engine 2

  • @realprogrammer

    And that's good considering the fact that this is on console, if they managed to squeeze in Cry Engine 2 to run on consoles, that is more of an achievement than actually improving the engine...

  • Cant they make any good multiplayer this time i might consider buying a Cry game

  • /watch?v=mBjyQOzI3oM

  • horrible textures, runs at 20 fps, looks like a game cube game.

    This is what happens when developers go multi-platform.

  • @fragman08 you. are. incredibly stupid. You really think youtube quality is the same as ingame. And yea, runs at 20 fps all low settings on your shitty prehistoric computer.

  • @AphamX You. do. not. use. proper. Syntax. Yet you have the fucking cheek to call me stupid.

    My "prehistoric" computer has a phenom x6 overclocked to 4.4 Ghz, two HD 6970's running in crossfire, and an 850W psu to support them, I also have a rather nice 30" lg wg3000H-BN.

    I get 60+ average fps in crysis warhead on "enthusiast" settings.

    Go fuck yourself consoletard, your existence must be as inconsequential as a dog scratching his bollocks.

    Good day to you.

  • @fragman08 Then why the fuck do you say this game has horrible textures and runs at 20 fps. This was in 2009 and youtube quality kills it, you do realize that right. Yes I agree putting this game on xbox and ps3 is a total waste, but that doesn't mean the pc version is going to be bad.

  • @AphamX yes it does, because if they were focusing their efforts on getting it to run best on PC and PC alone, It would be better than it is at the moment.  Much better.

  • @fragman08 not to mention it would have been released by now. I built a new pc for this, cmon crytek if you delay this one more time, i swear...

  • my poor pc, its gonna get fried

  • CryEngine 3 is simply a more optimized engine, a.k.a like the Unreal Engine, optimized to use as minimal amount of graphical memory as possible, making it usable on consoles, ask them yourselves.

  • Kids are such babies, crying over graphics.

    "Only 4x antialiasing?!? fewikwfoIEPJFOPWO"

  • @stevensonbak

    Same kids who's Dad owns his $5000 PC I bet.

  • it will be released 2012? lol crysis 2 will come march 2011 not 2012 and its first game that will come with it and anyways 3 years old consoles will use it

  • Excellent performance for both machines in DFS, but too shity video quality to notice.

  • id tech 5 .-.

  • @qweadsf id tech 5 ain't got nothing on cryengine 3, bro.

  • @xamanto id tech 5 with RAGE probably looks much better on consoles than Crysis 2 because the textures are hand made, great chance it would lose on the PC against Crytek though... So ya ups and downs

    (Can't make a real comparison anyway since each have different art styles, one realistic and another uses a much better borderlands style...)

  • @qweadsf textures being hand made is not an argument. ALL textures are hand-made. the style is certainly different but the technological advancement in terms of texture and object streaming will decide the "winner". streaming megatextures from a DVD already turns out to be a pain in the ass and I guess yeah we will have to wait and see what looks better (technologically, not artwork-wise).

    On the PC crysis 2 will undoubtedly be the most awesome-looking title for years to come.

  • looks like shit, prob a bad HD rip ?

  • The only thing that I have noticed that is easily seen that is better about CryEngine 3 is the branches on the trees look alot more natural and less square, and that Crytek have taken up the "Really dark, sharp shadow look" that was made incredibly popular via the CCC mod for Crysis and Crysis Warhead. It looks much more realistic. But then again, we have only seen console gameplay in 720p(Probably lower) I'm sure it will look 10x better on PC when your playing.

  • He's gonna take u back to the past

    To play some shitty games that suck ass

    the rotten womit

    the consoles criple

    he's a cryengine number 3

  • the only concern with gaming on a pc is b/c there is alot more money going into a pc than a console. a gaming pc will cost 4x or more than a console, not many people are willing to pay that much when they can get a console for the same thing basicaly. then their is the fan base, and the games that don't want to transfer over to pc, and honestly i would rather play rpg's on the pc and shooters on console.

  • @captainclayman cryengine 3 is about the same as cryengine 2 running medium even though i own a ps3 and hate to admit it for example: you see that mountain in the distance and theres no trees on it cryengine2 running very-high there are trees all on that mountain and the rocket that he fired only moved what it hit on cryengine3 but cryengine2 displays a little bit of shockwave movement in the plants around it. So the PC version is infact better (cryengine 2)

  • cool

  • crytek signed with microsoft for a new xbox exclusive

  • @PrestonP95 yeah right...

  • AWESOME!

  • there are 3 modes for Cryengine 3.

    XBOX360, PS3, PC, PC will gain more performance and probably a little increase of Graphics.

    Cryengine 2 looks better than the Cryengine 3 in Console mode but, Cryengine is highly optimized therefor would Cryengine 2 run worse than the Cryengine3 in PC mode while Cryengine 3 will improve in graphics too ^^

  • looks the same to me

  • Have they even advanced from Cry Engine 2 ? It almost looks behind it at times...

  • @trickmast Its gone back but what did you expect this is console footage and there is no way in hell cryengine 2 would run on console.

    Pc version should be a jump forward im confident crytek will deliver.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE I think it's unlikely... PC users will probably be able to tweak it higher eventually, but I doubt the PC version will look better by default (aside from the obvious native PC benifits like high resoloutions, AA and AF).

    Thanks to excessive piracy, it looks like Crytek will be making watered-down, console-centric engines from now on...

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE If they dont they r skrewd

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE Cant even run high on pc with out a decent system

  • @trickmast

    Who cares?,gameplay makes a game not graphics.Talk about the steriotypical PC gamers......

  • @MEDzZ3RO

    Yes and it is reknown that Crysis was lacking big time in gameplay, they won't rectify this with any future releases, you either have it or you don't and Crytek don't. If the graphics aren't advancing then there's no real reason for this game to be any good imo.

  • @trickmast

    I know but having said that,the Crysis 2 gameplay seems to of improved quite a bit.I'm basing that on the trailers.etc..

    Seeing as it's coming to PS3 I'm certainly keeping an eye open for it because as a concept it's good,let's hope the gameplay can deliver.

  • @trickmast looks about the same (and slightly better on pc, keep in mind that's the console version) and performs twice as well if not better.

  • @trickmast its His Video that sucks ass, not the engine

  • @bloodsuckern Dude it's a step backward, period.

  • @trickmast Also, the poster of this video just downloaded the video from another [youtube]source. It might be in "HD" but it's still an artifact. The quality of the video is diminished since R3APERvsTYETREE didn't upload an original; instead, a copy to obtain views.

  • @merrickx I did not download from a you tube source i downloaded original source from File Planet/IGN where i pay a quarterly subscription charge. Then for whatever reason you tube wouldnt take the original format so it was converted, which lost some of the quality.

    So dont assume that i copied it from anyone elses channel on you tube to obtain views.

  • this isnt fir next gen systems there releasing the gamr next year for ps3 and xbox 360. But i dont see how it will be playable with frames of 15 to 25 fps on consoles. Unless they tone down the graphics alot for consoles, and i mean alot.

  • @TheXtraGuy Consoles aren't good for any FPS-games as the hardware just isn't scalable in any way. I'd hate to program games for consoles as I'd hate to have to constantly limit myself.

  • is very simple:

    pc is better than a xbox or a ps3... ja

  • My GTX 480 is gonna rape this in full HD and full detail settings... can't wait! :-D

  • @ShamblerDK Don't you mean, "my GTX 480 will be able to play this on high once I can afford 3 more! 4 times SLi! Can't wait! lol. On another note, why are developers jumping so far ahead on graphics when they know that only 99.9% of all PC owners will be able to play them and only 99.99% will be able to play them in all their glory? Are they just pushing the boundries to get people to upgrade or to lead the industry forward in terms of graphics?

  • @lllsqu1gslll My bad 00.1% and 00.01%, IM CONFUSED!!! O.o

  • @lllsqu1gslll I think you need to go back to school to learn something about percentages. Read what you just wrote. VERY slowly.

    Anyways, the development of faster computer hardware is growing exponentially, while getting cheaper and cheaper, so we're going to see a lot of computers that are capable of running the Cry Engine 3 in all it's glory much sooner than you think. And definitely more than the 0.01% that you think. (0.01% is what you meant to say btw, not 99.99%).

  • @ShamblerDK I said that in a comment above my comment, I failed bad, I was half asleep! sorry, and the percentages were over the top! XP

  • @lllsqu1gslll Right, I am sorry for my outburst.

    Still, I think that my GTX 480 will own the new Cry Engine. My motherboard will need an upgrade though, as I am currently still on an X38-chipset on my Asus Maximus Formula, and that means I will need to upgrade my CPU and RAM as well *sigh* :-s

  • @ShamblerDK It's ok, I have a GTX 470, I wonder how well it will work! O_o P.S if it doesnt go well, you can always overclock! XP

  • This looks exactly the same as CryEngine 2...

  • @mechtech256 no, CryEngine 2 for PC is better, CryEngine 3 is like 2 for consoles, but they cut many things

  • Die neue Engine ist doch einfach genial, ein Werk auf das die entwickler stolz sein können nur ein bisschen schade find ich das sie die Leistungen heruntergesetzt haben nur damit man das Game auch auf der schwulen ps und der xbox zocken kann es gibt so doch schon ein haufen spiele die nur für ps sind...aber egal ich finde das die neue Engine ein vorzeiger ist, spiele wie battelfield und cod können da auch nicht mehr mithalten

  • Die neue Engine ist einfach genial es gibt einfach nichts was das übertrifft da haben die entwikler doch was geschaftt worauf sie stolz sein können...also ich werd aufjedenfall das spiel kaufen allerdings find ich es ein bisschen schade das die leistungen reduziert worden sind nur für die schwule ps und die xbox

  • lol not the cry 3 engine..

  • Consoles, Kiss mah ass!

  • Cryengine 3 = cry2 + City envoirement and the physx + cloth has ben upgraded/added

  • @ErwinMaster

    O'rly?. . . I thought it was simply a stripped down version of cry 2 (+ a couple of effects) to enable consoles to use it.

  • just game people who cares about whats the better platform for god sakes if ur on the internet trying to prove that what you game on is better for whatever reason you should just go kill yourself because there are more important things to worry about they are all great and games are made for fun you guys are missing the entire fucking point of the hobby

  • My computer is quietly crying while displaying this.

  • 45 people are blind :p

  • @dragonki123

    46 people actualy knows that Cryengine 2 (PC) is capable to do better than Cryengine 3 (Console).

  • is cryengin3 game desining program pecas if it is im downloading it

  • Nice...

  • cryengine 3 isn't released in 2012 this year crysis 2 come WITH cryengine 3

  • @SeppderBaumeister They just changed it to 2015 for console because the lag and low fps was unacceptable.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE

    Crysis won't work on console,it has great visuals but not very good gameplay.And because Crysis 2 iscoming to both 360 and PS3 it will be designed around 360 specs meaning visually it won't be great even by console standards.It'll be another bargain bin one off.That's the sad truth of the console version.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE its coming out december 31 2010 for console and pc bro

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE LOL? i though i was never gonna be released for consoles cuz their ain't good enough

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE FAAAAAAAAAAAAAG

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE wait crysis 2 wont be on consoles till 2015!?

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE no lol, hahaha

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE so what pc users get something sooner than console people?

  • i agree with wizzle dumb the pc will always be better than any other console out there because it is more poweful and more upgradeable than any other console in the world.

  • @sweet10122

    Hahahhaha, noob!!

  • @sweet10122

    That it´s just not true.

  • @RODILLASEXPLOSIVAS Which part isnt true, every thing i read is absolutly true, console is 5 or 6 gen behind pc.

    If something new comes we can buy it and put it in our pc to keep it up to date console owners have to wait 5 years or more and even when they finally release a new console it will still be behind.

  • timesplitters 4!!!! me want it now!!!!!!!

  • 2012 lol?

    Crysis 2 with CryEngine 3 is going to be released this year...

  • God, all of you fucking PC and console fanboys shut the fuck up. Games are not supposed to be about graphics, they're supposed to be about gameplay. Spectacular graphics are nice, but if a game plays like shit, then it don't matter what platform it's on.

  • The way console & multi-platform games are developed work: Optimization to get it work on the XBOX360... Optimization to get it work on the PS3... Oh god, how much do you have to degrade the graphics! :/ Also, because of you console guys, we, PC users, again lost a good exclusive title... Why wasn't uncharted 2, that looks crappy, because of the spammed post processing effects, like DOF blur, enough for you? I think many people here with good PC's agree, that crysis should stay PC exclusive!

  • @RaZoRFinnish Actually, we didn't lose the Crysis series because of console gamers, we lost it because too many bastards were pirating the game.

  • @Colethecon And because of that they decided to move to multi-platform marketing. It's very likely that they would have gone multi-platform anyway (More money... It's all about money nowdays.).

  • @Colethecon Xbox 360 games are piratable too.. Actually, piracy is not a big problem because the ps3 is the only console to be unhackable and it's still sold enough to compete with the xbox360.

  • @IDStatic Ps3 doesnt compete with xbox in sale numbers and is sonys biggest flop ever, you know they have not made any profit on ps3 consoles since release even the slim they sell at a loss.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE

    Have you looked at the recent figures??,there isn't alot in it.Also the Wii has sold almost all PS3 and 360 sales combined.

    The PS3 is Sonys biggest flop but the PS1 and PS2 sold so many,they made their huge profit there.Microsoft have never had those kind of sales.

    They aren't selling at a loss any more,there sale percentages are rising quicker then its 2 rivals;if they were losing money they would of never bothered with the Slim because it would be suicidal.

  • @MEDzZ3RO Ps3 is still selling at a loss today that is a fact, the reason for the slim was so they lose less.

    Go do some research or would you like me to do it for you.

    Now imn ot saying they cant afford to lose money on it thats not my point, the point is they are losing money and will continue to lose money on the ps3 console.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE

    It's counterproductive to put out technically the same system if they were losing money,especially seeing as compared to the original the PS2 slim didn't sell brilliantly.

    There figures were up this year as they were last year.All previous years however they were coming up short.

    360 is made cheaper and it does show with all its cheap plastics,hardware issues and general overall quality.All Microsoft have ever cared about is the cash unlike their Japanese rivals.

  • hey guys check my channel and you will be surprise, if you watch my fan animated video for crysis 2, i hope :)

  • if anyone have interest for a fan animation trailer, than check my channel or look a lidll bit down.

  • It looks worse than cry engine 2 on lowest settings. Cryfail

  • Fuck. That gun must be above his head.

  • graphics one day will reach a limit only because the developers would spend their entire lifes making photorealistic and extremly detailed maps.

  • @seusgordo yes it will but not because of the time. it will just hit the same wall CG movies already have -> can't get much more real than real life.

  • @MrGreekdog Because that isn't possible :D

  • dont flame or anything but... they could of done better (except the waterfall that could be mistaken for real)

  • @Followingalegend

    But this engine is now aimed at consoles. So they had to kinda dumb a lot down from cry engine 2 :/

  • @xxsonyboy4lfexx yeh true but if the optimise it perfectly they could prob get crysis 1 on consoles aswell just doesnt take that much power to run crysis as people think only need a 256mb card and consoles have 512mb :) except wii at 64mb lol

  • @Followingalegend They have 512MB in total...You can already see where they cut back to fit it into the limited RAM

  • @GokoJuji its still posible its all optimisation :)

    think soon in the future we will find a way of making games like gta 4 100kb lol but i think that will be in a looooooooooong time

    but its all just optimisation

    anyhow im not to botherd about consoles im a pc gamer :P

  • @Followingalegend Optimisation will eventually hit a wall...That's why we see marginal improvements in games

    No matter how much you optimise it, Far Cry would never make its way to the PS1

  • @GokoJuji i know that but i could easily see crysis 1 running ona ps3 or 360 from some optimisation tweeks

    but the fact is now the crytek have managed to do it with there new engine :P

  • @Followingalegend LOL, Crysis 1 could never run on a ps3 or 360, sorry fanboy.

  • @wizzledumb im not a fanboy of consoles xD im all about pc but it could be possible nothing is imposible ;D

  • @wizzledumb

    You do realise when PS3 and 360 were released they were on par with high spec PCs?,or has that slipped your mind?

  • @MEDzZ3RO LOL, no....check the specs of PS3 and 360 and compare with PC specs... PC is and always will be ahead of consoles.

  • @wizzledumb what "pc specs"? youre missing the point. why is it so hard to understand that ANY bashing is plain stupid. things are the way they are for a reason! duh!

    buy a cheap pc with "specs" better than a 360. cost? - possibly less than a 360, right? now can you play modern warfare 2 on it @ decent settings? no.

    that is called "optimization".

    on consoles: no settings, no upgrades, no cheating in multiplayer, more intuitive controls than with a keyboard, hardware support etc.

    im a pc gamer.

  • @SuckItLily

    Finally a PC/console gamer like myself who actually knows there stuff.Alot of people aren't understanding what I've been on about.The PS3 and 360 upon release were insanely powerful even by top end PC specs.Just after they were released alot of their tech was being used in PCs.

  • @MEDzZ3RO At the time of development they may have been close but buy the time they got them produced and to market they were way behind.

    The gap is to big for them to ever get up to par now, especially at the price point they will sell at.

    one of my graphics cards which is the fastest gpu is worth more than 5 xbox consoles and theres now way sony or microsoft would ever consider putting one of these monsters in a console.

    So it can never be as powerful.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE

    You reckon?,yet the PC was way ahead of Xbox,Gamecube and PS2 but PS3 and 360 caught up.The gap is shrinking year by year as is the PC market...

    Neither Sony nor Microsoft will put a gpu that size in a console for years,reason being they don't have too.

    The consoles already control most of the gaming market,so why bother,it'd be wasted money to them.

    Gaming PCs are only kept in the game because of visuals,if they lose that edge,The whole market would die out..

  • @MEDzZ3RO Im not on about popularity we all know console is king but the gap isnt shrinking in terms of performance, i dont know where you get your info, if the console hasnt been updated how can it be catching the pc.

    Pc is the most powerful gaming machine there is console cant ever catch up.

    Console is for people that dont know any better or have only ever used some old family dell pc.

    Without pc console is just just an empty plastic box.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE

    I'm talking about when 360 and PS3 were released,not at the moment because unlike PCs at the moment consoles aren't upgradable.Which in my eyes is a good thing,it keeps costs down.

    Look back when consoles 1st came in,the gap between PCs and console was far greater then,then it is now.Every gen the gap has shrunk.

    PCs are good for fps and strategy games,but it's controls just aren't that brilliant for racing games or games like Fight night where sticks make the game.

  • @MEDzZ3RO pc is also best for fps were mouse and keyboard rule, but even when the next gen console comes out it still cant be as powerful as the best gaming pc today so by the time the next consoles do come they are gonna be further behind, you will be lucky to get something as powerful as a 200m series gpu which is about 2+ years old already.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE

    Mouse,fair comment,keyboard no.A stick offers more movement precision because on a PC you have to press 2 buttons to move diagonally whereas a stick is straight to the point.

    I'm not talking about the best gaming PC,I'm talking about the average gaming PC.Top end PCs are a waste of money atm seeing as there is nothing to challenge them and use all their potential.A much cheaper PC offers similar results and is more cost effective.

  • @MEDzZ3RO how about buying a gamepad and playing with with it on your PC eh?

    and a 500-800$ PC is enough to play anything on max lol

  • @Raisuke94

    Lol,I do on the odd occasion on CoD4 if I'm in my bros room for a bit.As soon as you have mapped buttons out and sorted the slight button delay,it's fine.Much better then a mouse and keyboard,I can't use one for gaming to save my life,lol.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE a new generation of consoles always starts out more powerful than ridiculously expensive gaming pcs at that time. then pc hardware slowly takes over again in the following years. when xbox 360 came out there was barely any pc that could beat it, until in 2007 nvidia released the geforce 8 and crysis was released. no matter if the next gen comes in 2014, 15 or 16, atleast one of the two (nintendo doesnt count) will temporarily beat any <2000 dollar pc, while being sold for 500.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE

    Console Makers Wouldn't put in a 2+ Year old GPU,They would use the Most High-End GPU on the Market.

    So Next-Gen Consoles Can Run Crysis 2 at Max Settings and Still have LOADS More Potential,Considoring the GPUs that will come out During 2013,2014 or Even 2015

  • @wariofan279

    "Console Makers Wouldn't put in a 2+ Year old GPU,They would use the Most High-End GPU on the Market." You're joking right? Even when the ps3 and 360 had just been released they couldn't even out perform a even mid range PC.

    consoles will always be the weaker performers simply because it’s the computer industry that drives the components within a console gaming system. As such, consoles will always trail behind by at least a few years in terms of performance.

  • @manhunt48

    Sorry man,My Cousin Payed an Unexcpected Visit and just used my Account to troll around,Truth is,I'm a PC Gamer and i'm in love with my 5970.

  • @R3APERvsTYETREE If you think about it, a computer is a console...You say the next gen console won't be as powerful as the best gaming pc today? Considering the fact that they said they weren't even thinking of an idea for the next gen console for another few years. I think the people that want to make an actual "Next Gen Console" will be smart enough to use "Next Gen" Material. Like, stuff we haven't used yet? Meaning better than video cards in computers today. Technology is only advancing.

  • @zergapollo True it is advancing but the gpus are only getting bigger, hotter, use a shit load more power and cost more than 2.5 times of todays consoles,

    Today there already way out of price range for a console and it will be the same in the future. Remember the console needs to be affordable if they were to sell for 1k then they would be a 10th of the way there.

    And a computer is not a console and never will be even if you think about it.

  • @zergapollo if a console uses the best of the best in its time (or even top 5 best material) you will still pay $300 JUST FOR THE GRAPHICS CARD! consoles will NEVER come close to matching a pc's power END OF DISCUSSION. if you are serious about gaming, you will BUILD A PC, not buy a console. just like proffesionals, WHAT DO THEY GET? A NETBOOK?NO! they get a $2000+ powerhouse of a pc

  • @zergapollo what the console does offer, which the pc doesn't is a very strong community

  • @dirty1smelly1turban POC doesn't have a strong community?

    There's like five million players on World of Warcraft for example.

  • @DarkLiberatorZone no, you didn't get what i was trying to say. pc has strong COMMUNITIES, NOT COMMUNITY. the problem i find is that one game, or group of games is not connected with another. steam or xfire is the closest thing we have to a unified community, unlike xbox live, or psn where all gamers are united. if we had something like that, we would be unstoppable. it would allow the great capabilities of the pc communities to share with each other.

  • @dirty1smelly1turban except PC gamers don't want to be united in one huge pile.

  • @xamanto very true

  • @xamanto there are downsides and upsides

  • @MEDzZ3RO Hey, X360 controllers aren't THAT expensive.

  • @msqrt

    Batteries are,2-4 weeks is often when you need a new set and it ain't cheap especially when you add all the other payments that come with 360,online,wifi adapter (on older consoles) and repairs.

    My original PS3 and Wii are both still working fine after 4 years but the 360 has had 2 repairs in a 2 month period.

  • @MEDzZ3RO Oh, I don't play consoles much anymore, though I have a Wii laying around. I just meant it's great for PC gaming - it's easily connected and a lot of games support it directly. And mine is not wireless, so no battery problems :)

  • @MEDzZ3RO You must intentionally break your 360. My first one only ever red ringed once from use, but an off/on fixed it. It eventually stopped reading discs. So did my bud's PS3. My other friend's PS3 had yellow light of death. The one who's PS3 stopped reading discs got a slim one that works. I've had my 2nd 360 as well for a few years now and not one single red ring even after excessive use or falling asleep with it on. Now PS3 has bad firmware updates and 360 has poor internet, so it's even.

  • @AntiFox08

    Wrong on so many levels.

    A recent survey (April 2010) shows 360 fail rate is 46% when compared to PS3s 8%.Browse the internet for surveys if you don't believe me.Mine was on lazygamer(dot)net.

    The "bad" firmware updates were at the beginning of the PS3s lifespan;more recently they are generally patches against hacking and homebrew apps and naturally aren't considered good because it removes there software.