so wait will the space maps have normal gravity less gravity or no gravity?...if ur in orbit there shouldn't be normal gravity. though the game doesn't have to be perfectly realistic to be fun... the only difference i see between space and ground battles is that the space maps seem to be more arena like... what do you guys think?
Stop supporting their products? Name one. I bought a 360 three years ago and the only game I bought in a two year span was Gears of War 3. I bought a WII years ago and Zelda was the only game that was good. Also, game developers are not supporting PC gaming anymore. This is coming from a true PC fan that spends over a thousand dollars on new equipment every year.
No doubt that Starhawk will be fun as hell, but won't be popular.
The developers made a huge mistake. Warhawk was the best online console shooter but was not popular due to cartoony graphics, weapons, environments, lack of perks/rewards/streaks/customisation etc .... and being a 3rd Person Shooter.
The developers should have made Warhawk as a simple version of Battlefield 2, with realistic MODERN WARFARE weapons, environments, vehicles(Jets & helicopters not Warhawks).... and made it a FPS.
@fulconer No. Sorry, but that would make it bad. Oh wait, you were joking, right? 'Cause otherwise you just sound like an FPS fanboy. Please tell me you're joking.
@TheSuburbanHero Clearly you are a cartoon 3rd person shooter fanboy. So sad that you feel gameplay is so GOOD from a 3rd person pov.
So why is it bad to be playing FCTF with F16 Jet or AH-64 Apache instead of a Warhawk ... or capturing Zones in you Merkava IV MBT or M1ABrams .... or playing TDM with a FN P90 and Five-Seven pistol?
That's right. It's not bad at all. Just better looking, cooler, popular and more realistic feeling shooter. And full games to this day.
@fulconer No. BF3 is one of my most anticipated games this season- and it's what you just described. If that's what you want, fine. Neither Warhawk nor Starhawk tried to mimic that style- they have their own, unique one. Obviously, you haven't matured (either literally or figuratively) to the point where you can accept all kinds of games. The FPS market is flooded and it's nice to have something different. Plus, some 3rd person shooters can be as good or better than FPSs (Uncharted & GoW > CoD).
@TheSuburbanHero BF3 is going to be a good game but will never achieve the chaos of Warhawk battles due to reduced player numbers, reduced vehicles numbers .... ie gimped maps for the console version.
Warhawk has shown, you don't need destructible environments for spectacular gaming.
Warhawk could have been BF2 for the consoles .... over three years ago. But instead, they made it a cartoony TPS.
And now they are bringing us Starhawk, which will be fun but will quickly die in popularity.
@fulconer So wait, are you saying you liked Warhawk or not? Your comment kinda confused me. It's nice to see that you're a bit calmer, but there are still flaws in your argument. Warhawk was one of the most popular PS3 games at launch, and as with most games, there will still be people playing as long as the servers are up. Plus, you're still missing the point. Light Box never wanted it to be BF2 for consoles. They made it with a specific vision and for the most part made it happen.
@fulconer so in other words make it generic, no originality and it will sell, im glad you aren't a game developer and there are ones out there who are trying to innovate the game industry at this time when war fps are all we seen to be getting at the moment
I am a veteran at Warhawk, Killzone 2, and Bad Company 2 player and HATE cod online.
There is f*ck all people playing Warhawk ...if at all.... cause it's an uncool 3rd person, cartoony shooter.
A FPS Warhawk with modern Jets, Helicopters, MBT, APCs etc and realistic weapons & environments would have destroyed Mw1/w online .... and still be popular today.
The awesome GAMEPLAY remains the same ... fools ... just looks BETTER
I am a veteran at Warhawk, Killzone 2, and Bad Company 2 player and HATE cod online.
There is f*ck all people playing Warhawk ...if at all.... cause it's an uncool 3rd person, cartoony shooter.
A FPS Warhawk with modern Jets, Helicopters, MBT, APCs etc and realistic weapons & environments would have destroyed Mw1/w online .... and still be popular today.
The awesome GAMEPLAY remains the same ... fools ... just looks BETTER
@fulconer That's a very stupid idea.Gameplay remain the same ? they will have to make huge changes to the gameplay which will just ruin it and make it a BF clone which isn't needed.What real life jets pilots like the warhawks ? None.What kind of realistic APC deploys a bubble shield ? NONE.Making this game realistic and a fps is incredibly stupid cause alot of the best gameplay aspects of it isn't realistic at all..Warhawk was popular enough for it to last .
@migueldELLO Too many stupid noobs commenting about a game they don't truly understand. If you were a veteran at the game like myself, then you would know that IT IS NOT THE GIMMICKY THINGS in the game(Jetpacks, shields, stealth, dropship, APC spawn point etc) that makes Warhawk great BUT (1) Large maps (2) plenty of vehicles air/land (3) Freedom for all players to use everything(weapons/vehicles) any way they want <<That is the CORE of Warhoawk gameplay ... how the players used everything.
@fulconer I play warhawk everyday since it came out and no those things do matter but what really makes the game is what the tittle is based on , the warhawks.It all comes together to a great experience.If you want to play battlefield go play battlefield, this is warhawk.If you're too upset that the developers aren't doing what YOU want and satisfy your needs then don't buy it.I'm buying this for what truly made warhawk , warhawk and no that doesn't transfer well in a realistic setting.
Starhawk will be as great as Warhawk because (1) large maps (2) plenty of vehicles(including Jetpacks) (3) Freedom to use everything(including Build & Battle) any way the player wants. But it won't be as popular as realistic LOOKING FPS. MW2/3 are NOT realistic but are cool, with its gimmicky things, and has closer intimate gameplay being a FPS. Huge fanbase .... full servers .... loads of top players still playing. NOT SO WITH WARHAWK. Do the maths.
@fulconer We don't need another realistic FPS we got plenty of those....starhawk should stay exactly how it is.And news flash look at halo it's not realistic at all but halo 3 sold 11 million copies .It's not about realism it's about execution, warhawk wasn't as popular because well it wasn't big enough.Only 5 maps,3 vehicles and 4 games modes and that's about it.It doesn't need realism it's needs overload of content.Starhawk doesn't need to be realistic infact it will ruin the best parts of it.
@migueldELLO I never said REALISTIC FPS. I said REALISTIC LOOKING. If you are a true veteran of Warhawk, you will know that the gameplay will not be different -- IN ANY WAY -- if the tank looked like an M1 Abrams or Merkava IV .... if the Warhawk looked like a F-22 or Su-27 ... if there were SCAR-L, G36 or FN P90s, if the environment LOOKED like modern environments .... if it was a FPS. But the game would be more popular and cool by how it >> LOOKS << Gameplay will be the same, General.
@fulconer You're no true warhawk veteran if you want to drastically sacrifice the things that separates warhawk from other shooters of the same genra.how the hell can you put warhawk gameplay in a realistic looking game ? with a modern jet ? It's impossible for any jet to move like that and fly around picking up weapons.Alot of the best gameplay of warhawk does not transfer well in realistic looking game.Stop saying ''true WH veteran' you're assuming your opinion is the absolute truth.
@migueldELLO I've had enough of this. You are indeed a narrow minded noob .... especially when you continue to believe what made Warhawk gameplay so good was all the gimmicky things you could do, and continue to fail to understand my point even though it is written in black and white and is as clear as night and day. Like beating a dead donkey. I'm out.
@fulconer Narrow minded? your ideas has to be the most close minded,stupid and badly though out ideas suggested for warhawk.Warhawk veteran my ass.Gimmicky ? I suppose the best multiplayer areal combat is gimmicky?The best multiplayer APC is also gimmicky? or the best dropship,jetpack etc.Nice job there telling developers to screw their ideas and make it a battlefield clone just for it to be more popular EVEN THO halo is more popular then battlefield and is it realistic ? NO.go play battlefield.
@RajmanGamingHD Thrid person shooters are just as bad for consoles. Seriously it sucks...there are just some games that play 10000000x better with mouse and keyboard and one of them is a fps/tps
@TheDASChris I have all 3 consoles :) I'm just saying, if controlers are such a shitty option of game control, go look at the sales figures of the CoD series on consoles and ponder whether these people feel the same. I'm not debating that PC control isn't better, but controls are still good and appease millions upon millions of gamers around the world. Maybe you just need more practice?
This has been flagged as spam show
would anyone please support my Starhawk Public Beta playthrough? It would be wonderful if u like, favorite and comment on the videos of mine.
BattlefieldJoe97 1 week ago
The physics look like shit.
EPICBOSSWIN 1 week ago
@EPICBOSSWIN What are you talking about? -_- You fail.
GamesParodyCentral 6 days ago
I'm pre-ordering this ;)
MultiAndreas009 2 weeks ago
It'd be epic if people actually worked together like this :p
PokemonJack333 3 weeks ago
I love the way in Starhawk/Warhawk trailers the trailer is exactly like the gameplay.
TheUltraluke 1 month ago
The game is awesome except when your teammates are idiots that put random stuff around the map and they dont even help protect the flag.
bryanZ17 1 month ago
0 Dislikes. If you wanna be the first, I will hunt you down and kill you with a kinetic rifle.
Levitaterman 1 month ago
at 1:19 in warhawk both would have died cause of mine :P
MrAcehard 1 month ago
fuck yea
Elbergotas100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Take the Starhawk survey now, and tell what needs to be improved.
watch?v=YjJjyUIBeHI&feature=youtu.be
DroidMediaHD 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Details on how to get the Starhawk private beta here:
/watch?v=HuWXrtnpKTM
TheGOODKyle 2 months ago
ownage
eddyg0rd0 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheGOODKyle 2 months ago
so wait will the space maps have normal gravity less gravity or no gravity?...if ur in orbit there shouldn't be normal gravity. though the game doesn't have to be perfectly realistic to be fun... the only difference i see between space and ground battles is that the space maps seem to be more arena like... what do you guys think?
hluengas 2 months ago
@hluengas they fight on some kind of platform that makes gravitation i guess
eddyg0rd0 2 months ago
Comment removed
astewart455 2 months ago
@astewart455
Stop supporting their products? Name one. I bought a 360 three years ago and the only game I bought in a two year span was Gears of War 3. I bought a WII years ago and Zelda was the only game that was good. Also, game developers are not supporting PC gaming anymore. This is coming from a true PC fan that spends over a thousand dollars on new equipment every year.
SLEAZY808 2 months ago 2
Gotta love the bit when the jeep chasing him lol and you no he wants to tea bag the driver shooter and the fucking jeep lol
THCN4RG 3 months ago
Best multiplayer game of 2012? I think so:)
narutofroever 3 months ago 4
@narutofroever along side uncharted 3 yes they both are
fuck call of duty and bf3
THCN4RG 3 months ago
@THCN4RG ok maybe cod but not BF:)
narutofroever 3 months ago
Now update Colony Wars for the PS3 and give us a decent space combat game.
fromthedead 4 months ago
fucking beast..... its warhawk on crack.... and nigga i loved warhawk most intense war game ever , always some shit blowing up...
ThreeDaysOfDan 4 months ago
So who's ready for epic Starhawk machinimas?
TheSuburbanHero 4 months ago
@TheSuburbanHero I'll second that notion!
Xackadee 4 months ago
I'm considering buying a PS3 for this.........
Aaronmac404 4 months ago
@Aaronmac404 This, uncharted 3, killzone 3, little big planet 2, infamous 2. Come to the ps3 side, we have cookies ;)
TheMontageMasters 4 months ago
whats the difference if its keyboard, or controller. As long as everyone is using the same thing as I am its fair, and that's what matters.
hornedfrog2000 4 months ago
war hawk is still bad ass, but nobody plays it.
hornedfrog2000 4 months ago
No doubt that Starhawk will be fun as hell, but won't be popular.
The developers made a huge mistake. Warhawk was the best online console shooter but was not popular due to cartoony graphics, weapons, environments, lack of perks/rewards/streaks/customisation etc .... and being a 3rd Person Shooter.
The developers should have made Warhawk as a simple version of Battlefield 2, with realistic MODERN WARFARE weapons, environments, vehicles(Jets & helicopters not Warhawks).... and made it a FPS.
fulconer 5 months ago
@fulconer I mean, MW2+ is now the king of the shooters for a reason .... Not Halo or BC2 or Warhawk.
Learn from the competition .... copy/modify/adapt/improve.
fulconer 5 months ago
@fulconer No. Sorry, but that would make it bad. Oh wait, you were joking, right? 'Cause otherwise you just sound like an FPS fanboy. Please tell me you're joking.
TheSuburbanHero 4 months ago
@TheSuburbanHero Clearly you are a cartoon 3rd person shooter fanboy. So sad that you feel gameplay is so GOOD from a 3rd person pov.
So why is it bad to be playing FCTF with F16 Jet or AH-64 Apache instead of a Warhawk ... or capturing Zones in you Merkava IV MBT or M1ABrams .... or playing TDM with a FN P90 and Five-Seven pistol?
That's right. It's not bad at all. Just better looking, cooler, popular and more realistic feeling shooter. And full games to this day.
fulconer 4 months ago
@fulconer No. BF3 is one of my most anticipated games this season- and it's what you just described. If that's what you want, fine. Neither Warhawk nor Starhawk tried to mimic that style- they have their own, unique one. Obviously, you haven't matured (either literally or figuratively) to the point where you can accept all kinds of games. The FPS market is flooded and it's nice to have something different. Plus, some 3rd person shooters can be as good or better than FPSs (Uncharted & GoW > CoD).
TheSuburbanHero 4 months ago
@TheSuburbanHero
Warhawk was the closest I ever got to experience a BF2 -- huge maps, vehicles, air/land combat.
Its AWESOME is not due to it being a 3rd person shooter but (1) huge maps (2) vehicles air/land (3) freedom for players to use everything.
Warhawk gameplay would have been exactly the same if it was a FPS ... just more intimate/personal.
And if it had been made with Bad Company environments/vehicles/weapons it would still be popular today.
FPS haters r lame.
fulconer 4 months ago
@TheSuburbanHero BF3 is going to be a good game but will never achieve the chaos of Warhawk battles due to reduced player numbers, reduced vehicles numbers .... ie gimped maps for the console version.
Warhawk has shown, you don't need destructible environments for spectacular gaming.
Warhawk could have been BF2 for the consoles .... over three years ago. But instead, they made it a cartoony TPS.
And now they are bringing us Starhawk, which will be fun but will quickly die in popularity.
fulconer 4 months ago
@fulconer So wait, are you saying you liked Warhawk or not? Your comment kinda confused me. It's nice to see that you're a bit calmer, but there are still flaws in your argument. Warhawk was one of the most popular PS3 games at launch, and as with most games, there will still be people playing as long as the servers are up. Plus, you're still missing the point. Light Box never wanted it to be BF2 for consoles. They made it with a specific vision and for the most part made it happen.
TheSuburbanHero 4 months ago
@fulconer so in other words make it generic, no originality and it will sell, im glad you aren't a game developer and there are ones out there who are trying to innovate the game industry at this time when war fps are all we seen to be getting at the moment
TheLionelbodestrung 4 months ago
@TheLionelbodestrung Too many clueless gamers out there.
I am a veteran at Warhawk, Killzone 2, and Bad Company 2 player and HATE cod online.
There is f*ck all people playing Warhawk ...if at all.... cause it's an uncool 3rd person, cartoony shooter.
A FPS Warhawk with modern Jets, Helicopters, MBT, APCs etc and realistic weapons & environments would have destroyed Mw1/w online .... and still be popular today.
The awesome GAMEPLAY remains the same ... fools ... just looks BETTER
fulconer 4 months ago
@fulconer wtf you talking about... cod sucks dick
ThreeDaysOfDan 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThreeDaysOfDan Too many clueless gamers out there.
I am a veteran at Warhawk, Killzone 2, and Bad Company 2 player and HATE cod online.
There is f*ck all people playing Warhawk ...if at all.... cause it's an uncool 3rd person, cartoony shooter.
A FPS Warhawk with modern Jets, Helicopters, MBT, APCs etc and realistic weapons & environments would have destroyed Mw1/w online .... and still be popular today.
The awesome GAMEPLAY remains the same ... fools ... just looks BETTER
fulconer 4 months ago
@fulconer That's a very stupid idea.Gameplay remain the same ? they will have to make huge changes to the gameplay which will just ruin it and make it a BF clone which isn't needed.What real life jets pilots like the warhawks ? None.What kind of realistic APC deploys a bubble shield ? NONE.Making this game realistic and a fps is incredibly stupid cause alot of the best gameplay aspects of it isn't realistic at all..Warhawk was popular enough for it to last .
migueldELLO 4 months ago
@migueldELLO Too many stupid noobs commenting about a game they don't truly understand. If you were a veteran at the game like myself, then you would know that IT IS NOT THE GIMMICKY THINGS in the game(Jetpacks, shields, stealth, dropship, APC spawn point etc) that makes Warhawk great BUT (1) Large maps (2) plenty of vehicles air/land (3) Freedom for all players to use everything(weapons/vehicles) any way they want <<That is the CORE of Warhoawk gameplay ... how the players used everything.
fulconer 4 months ago
@fulconer I play warhawk everyday since it came out and no those things do matter but what really makes the game is what the tittle is based on , the warhawks.It all comes together to a great experience.If you want to play battlefield go play battlefield, this is warhawk.If you're too upset that the developers aren't doing what YOU want and satisfy your needs then don't buy it.I'm buying this for what truly made warhawk , warhawk and no that doesn't transfer well in a realistic setting.
migueldELLO 4 months ago
Starhawk will be as great as Warhawk because (1) large maps (2) plenty of vehicles(including Jetpacks) (3) Freedom to use everything(including Build & Battle) any way the player wants. But it won't be as popular as realistic LOOKING FPS. MW2/3 are NOT realistic but are cool, with its gimmicky things, and has closer intimate gameplay being a FPS. Huge fanbase .... full servers .... loads of top players still playing. NOT SO WITH WARHAWK. Do the maths.
fulconer 4 months ago
@fulconer We don't need another realistic FPS we got plenty of those....starhawk should stay exactly how it is.And news flash look at halo it's not realistic at all but halo 3 sold 11 million copies .It's not about realism it's about execution, warhawk wasn't as popular because well it wasn't big enough.Only 5 maps,3 vehicles and 4 games modes and that's about it.It doesn't need realism it's needs overload of content.Starhawk doesn't need to be realistic infact it will ruin the best parts of it.
migueldELLO 4 months ago
@migueldELLO I never said REALISTIC FPS. I said REALISTIC LOOKING. If you are a true veteran of Warhawk, you will know that the gameplay will not be different -- IN ANY WAY -- if the tank looked like an M1 Abrams or Merkava IV .... if the Warhawk looked like a F-22 or Su-27 ... if there were SCAR-L, G36 or FN P90s, if the environment LOOKED like modern environments .... if it was a FPS. But the game would be more popular and cool by how it >> LOOKS << Gameplay will be the same, General.
fulconer 4 months ago
@fulconer Too many ignorant haters of FPS and MW, keep ignoring the obvious.
fulconer 4 months ago
@fulconer You're no true warhawk veteran if you want to drastically sacrifice the things that separates warhawk from other shooters of the same genra.how the hell can you put warhawk gameplay in a realistic looking game ? with a modern jet ? It's impossible for any jet to move like that and fly around picking up weapons.Alot of the best gameplay of warhawk does not transfer well in realistic looking game.Stop saying ''true WH veteran' you're assuming your opinion is the absolute truth.
migueldELLO 4 months ago
@migueldELLO I've had enough of this. You are indeed a narrow minded noob .... especially when you continue to believe what made Warhawk gameplay so good was all the gimmicky things you could do, and continue to fail to understand my point even though it is written in black and white and is as clear as night and day. Like beating a dead donkey. I'm out.
fulconer 4 months ago
@fulconer Narrow minded? your ideas has to be the most close minded,stupid and badly though out ideas suggested for warhawk.Warhawk veteran my ass.Gimmicky ? I suppose the best multiplayer areal combat is gimmicky?The best multiplayer APC is also gimmicky? or the best dropship,jetpack etc.Nice job there telling developers to screw their ideas and make it a battlefield clone just for it to be more popular EVEN THO halo is more popular then battlefield and is it realistic ? NO.go play battlefield.
migueldELLO 4 months ago
@migueldELLO that kid needs to shut the hell up
machstarfox 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Looks way better than Warhawk.
PanaMacSpana 5 months ago
That loiks sick
thegustv1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lol fps on consoles thats like playing sports games with a keyboard
TheDASChris 5 months ago
@TheDASChris Dumbest comment ever, also this isnt a fps u clown. Stupid PC fanboys
RajmanGamingHD 5 months ago 18
@RajmanGamingHD Thrid person shooters are just as bad for consoles. Seriously it sucks...there are just some games that play 10000000x better with mouse and keyboard and one of them is a fps/tps
TheDASChris 5 months ago
@TheDASChris When you're playing with others who are using the same control it is irrelevant. Silly little PC fanboy :)
ROKUSHAKUBOJUTSU 5 months ago
@ROKUSHAKUBOJUTSU lol u so mad attached your ego to a game/console
TheDASChris 5 months ago
@TheDASChris I have all 3 consoles :) I'm just saying, if controlers are such a shitty option of game control, go look at the sales figures of the CoD series on consoles and ponder whether these people feel the same. I'm not debating that PC control isn't better, but controls are still good and appease millions upon millions of gamers around the world. Maybe you just need more practice?
ROKUSHAKUBOJUTSU 5 months ago
@ROKUSHAKUBOJUTSU Controllers are good for sport or fighting games but they are clearly inferior for fps. If you can't see that you must be a fanboy.
TheDASChris 5 months ago
@TheDASChris Maybe you should reread my last post. You are clearly confused.
ROKUSHAKUBOJUTSU 5 months ago
Yeah, the graphics is ugly for a game of 2011, but the game looks fun as hell, and that is what matters!
LuisSerious 5 months ago
this game gonna be a blast
Chris1T1234 5 months ago
graphics looks good men not THE BEST but good. And gameplay still maters
denzuiper 5 months ago
Looks way to fun to pass up 3rd Person Shooter FTW! Oh WarHawk was bad ass
FredEFuego 5 months ago 17
holy cow!
DENNlXXL 5 months ago
Looks so rad
THESCW1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this game is for PS3? graphics are really horrible.
shiro8812 5 months ago
@shiro8812 you do realize that the field of vision spans planets right?
rbrtchng 5 months ago
@shiro8812 lololol Graphic whore complainin bout graphics.. Didn't see that coming.
grievous549 5 months ago
@shiro8812 who cares?
mperry94 5 months ago
Amazing
evertonjf08 5 months ago
Finally.
Something new.
MikeToonist 5 months ago 2
awesome
HigHGuyism 5 months ago 3