After reading all the comments makes me glad I don't read music. I can enjoy anyones version because I can't play anything and therefore anyone that can play can do better than me. However lets not forget Alfred Brendle's rendition.
Liszt Liszt Liszt....how can ONE man write such a piece? Damn it, i think Yan Tiersen and Yanni are great composers, but as i listen to this.. I have no words!
PS: Volodos is no Horowitz. Horowitz was Horowitz and Volodos is Volodos, why would we cpmpare them? I am glad that i can listen to them both and enjoy them both. Rachmaninoff Played this piece another way, and so i am glad i also can listen to his version. Each of them are unique, and Liszt is the GOD!
Dont forget Marc Andre Hamelin... he plays a phenominal version of this piece... I consider Hamelin and Volodos probably the best piano players alive atm
I was fortunate to hear Volodos in person a couple of years ago. Over the past 45 years, I have heard hundreds of the best pianists in the world. This guy is in a league by himself both musically and technically. Everyone, even the most jaded concert-goers, came away speechless. The newspaper reviewer, who can sometimes be rather caustic, was shaking his head in astonishment and sheer disbelief at what we'd just heard. The greatest pianism goes beyond even the highest standards we can imagine.
i'm implying that some of the phrases which Horowitz plays loud sound too bashy, and it's not the recording, just the way he plays it, i can recording quality not being that great, but he just makes harsh sounds sometimes.
nobody can play the piano like volodos. I can play Volodos' version of this (the friska section) and his arrangement of turkish march, but can't get the clarity of his playing. I've heard Lang Lang's version and was disappointed at the way he plays it - lots of wrong notes and doesn't sound musical.
I totally agree with u. and whoever put thumbsdown for ur comment is fan of lang lang im sure... lang lang has loooooooong way to catch up with Volodos period.
Nah man, I took this audio directly from Volodos' CD of piano transcriptions. It is 100 percent Volodos plus just listen to the clarity which wasn't available in Horowitz's days.
@TysonMS man, horowitz died in 1989 and recorded his last cd 2 months before he died. The piano transcritpion cd by volodos is recorded in 1997. Only 8 years
impressive. by the way, if anyone's interested, I have the complete score. I mean this Horowitz transcription of HungRhap 2. The ending (from 8:54 onwards) is not as difficult as it sounds, if I can do it, you can do it too!
Your right, I'm glad someone else noticed this. For all its virtuosity, the ending is not as difficult as the original ending of Franz Liszt. Not to say Volodos couldn't pull it off if he wanted to. I just prefer the original version.
The original ending is by far the hardest, even though the Horowitz version is slightly harder overall. It features a lot of show off technique that sounds much harder than it is. He re-arranged the piece and gave it an easier ending. The ascending and descening octaves of the original ending are much harder to play correctly. Have you even seen the original ending on a score or tried playing it?
I actually have seen the score, and i'll admit i've never tried to play it. But what i've heard from people who have played both is that the horowitz cadenza is much much more difficult to pull off.
It's true that the cadenza is harder, but I'm referring to the ending part after the cadenza, which is only a few seconds of music. If you listen to most recording artists they fumble this original ending, which is why Horowitz made the easier version. The Horowitz verion is harder overall, but the ending of the original version with the staggered octaves is harder. I'm not referring to the cadenza, but the short segment after the cadenza (unless you consider this part of the cadenza)
But the original version is almost imposible to play:S Kastle was mentioned to be the only pianist who played it allright, but even he screwed up one chord... the 9th. But besides that, it's a great piece:D
Btw, FreddieHowe, could you please send me the score?:)
Hey um which score is it? I have a couple and they are both the horowitz but both a little different to each olther. One has a few chords instead of single notes and seems a bit more accurate but its very hard to read. So yeah which copy do you have?
yes, I've seen the two versions: the Pellisorus edition and the Ukraine. This one here sounds a lot more like the Ukraine version, and I know it's hard to read. But Horowitz himself does a combination of the two versions, if you really anylize it, as I've done.
This is Arcadi VOlodos, not Horowits. Shut up if anybody haven't heard the recording of Volodos's. I have the recording and this is the one. if u don't know something, dont write a comment u stupid kids
4.) However, HE IS TOTALLY DISRESPECT TO THE PIANO....I know he is entertaining/attracting the audiences...but.....for a real musician...They love the music, as well as their INSTRUMENT.....
Amazing rendition of beautifully composed and not less beautifully arrange piece. I don't know who is better, Horowitz or Volodos, in this piece and I don't think there's any sense in arguing about this. But I know that this performance was the first one which I heard of this piece. I had listened it many times before I heard Horowitz's one I was prepared for dissapointment because I couldn't imagine more perfect playing than Volodos'. Well, Horowitz's one just blew me away... LIVE!!!, 1953...
I came into this expecting it to be rubbish, and came out undeniably gobsmacked. This is one of my favourite pieces so I was wary to hear a version that had been largely altered, but this was really great.
Complete re-writing of the Friska! OMG, what inventivity in the mix of voices, and incredible pianism from golden ages. He's definitely not the deepest musician on earth, but music definitely needs such folks.
If you can’t get anywhere near this clarity, you can’t play it and you shouldn’t be recording it.
Rachmaninoffkid 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you listen very carefully you can hear Bang Bang crying...
masterofsynapsis 5 months ago
It's different, he plays it well, but I'm not sure if I like it.
DancerAndMe123 7 months ago
holy sh** at his repeated notes!
Imxtoeknee 1 year ago 6
After reading all the comments makes me glad I don't read music. I can enjoy anyones version because I can't play anything and therefore anyone that can play can do better than me. However lets not forget Alfred Brendle's rendition.
SigP229R 1 year ago
This is a masterpiece..
Liszt Liszt Liszt....how can ONE man write such a piece? Damn it, i think Yan Tiersen and Yanni are great composers, but as i listen to this.. I have no words!
PS: Volodos is no Horowitz. Horowitz was Horowitz and Volodos is Volodos, why would we cpmpare them? I am glad that i can listen to them both and enjoy them both. Rachmaninoff Played this piece another way, and so i am glad i also can listen to his version. Each of them are unique, and Liszt is the GOD!
musicioso 1 year ago
This isn't even the Horowizt arrangement but a truly new version of this Rhapsody
zangdaarr 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Volodos is a showman, not an artist.
mozartman2000 1 year ago
Dont forget Marc Andre Hamelin... he plays a phenominal version of this piece... I consider Hamelin and Volodos probably the best piano players alive atm
damgoodballers 1 year ago 3
I think reincarnation has to happen after you're dead, not before.
JohnEBPiano 1 year ago
Volodos > Horowitz, this piece doesn't sound like a jackhammer hahahahaha, so clean yet he just facerapes the piano at his will
ftballfrk 2 years ago
I was fortunate to hear Volodos in person a couple of years ago. Over the past 45 years, I have heard hundreds of the best pianists in the world. This guy is in a league by himself both musically and technically. Everyone, even the most jaded concert-goers, came away speechless. The newspaper reviewer, who can sometimes be rather caustic, was shaking his head in astonishment and sheer disbelief at what we'd just heard. The greatest pianism goes beyond even the highest standards we can imagine.
drwaynejohnson 2 years ago 2
in other words, you jizzed, which is what just happened to me when i listened to not even half of the piece
ftballfrk 2 years ago
i'm implying that some of the phrases which Horowitz plays loud sound too bashy, and it's not the recording, just the way he plays it, i can recording quality not being that great, but he just makes harsh sounds sometimes.
ftballfrk 2 years ago
No one really cares if Horowitz was first. This IS the Horowitz interpretation accept..not so aggresive and horrible.
ClassicMusicOnly 2 years ago
nobody can play the piano like volodos. I can play Volodos' version of this (the friska section) and his arrangement of turkish march, but can't get the clarity of his playing. I've heard Lang Lang's version and was disappointed at the way he plays it - lots of wrong notes and doesn't sound musical.
mmpianist 2 years ago 15
I totally agree with u. and whoever put thumbsdown for ur comment is fan of lang lang im sure... lang lang has loooooooong way to catch up with Volodos period.
laqin007 2 years ago
@mmpianist you can play volodos' turkish march??
stevemaster247 1 year ago
I didn't know Volodos until a couple of days ago. Now I am astonished! Finally a contemporary pianist that resembles the master Horowitz!
adrct 2 years ago 2
watch him playing stars and stripes ( pice from horowitz ) volodos plays it wayy better :)
hjiuhfhrehui 2 years ago
the best version ever. period.
DonFrankos 2 years ago 2
I now added this over my favourite videos and removed Lang Lang's funny version.
Egide0 2 years ago 3
Somewhere in a secluded room, Kastle is crying in enraged envy.
ExVash 2 years ago 34
Horowitz can't play like this clear. He just bangs the piano, on this piece.
laqin007 2 years ago
The recording of him is just shitty not him
tpbricknw 2 years ago
Nah man, I took this audio directly from Volodos' CD of piano transcriptions. It is 100 percent Volodos plus just listen to the clarity which wasn't available in Horowitz's days.
TysonMS 2 years ago 2
@TysonMS man, horowitz died in 1989 and recorded his last cd 2 months before he died. The piano transcritpion cd by volodos is recorded in 1997. Only 8 years
Kreutzersonata37 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Actually i think this is NOT volodos playing, definitly horowitz..
luke9o 2 years ago
impressive. by the way, if anyone's interested, I have the complete score. I mean this Horowitz transcription of HungRhap 2. The ending (from 8:54 onwards) is not as difficult as it sounds, if I can do it, you can do it too!
FreddieHowe 3 years ago
Your right, I'm glad someone else noticed this. For all its virtuosity, the ending is not as difficult as the original ending of Franz Liszt. Not to say Volodos couldn't pull it off if he wanted to. I just prefer the original version.
matthew1722 3 years ago
The horowitz ending is harder... Just not as much harder as people think. And overall the horowitz is considerably harder.
joshtorriero9 2 years ago 2
The original ending is by far the hardest, even though the Horowitz version is slightly harder overall. It features a lot of show off technique that sounds much harder than it is. He re-arranged the piece and gave it an easier ending. The ascending and descening octaves of the original ending are much harder to play correctly. Have you even seen the original ending on a score or tried playing it?
matthew1722 2 years ago
I actually have seen the score, and i'll admit i've never tried to play it. But what i've heard from people who have played both is that the horowitz cadenza is much much more difficult to pull off.
joshtorriero9 2 years ago
It's true that the cadenza is harder, but I'm referring to the ending part after the cadenza, which is only a few seconds of music. If you listen to most recording artists they fumble this original ending, which is why Horowitz made the easier version. The Horowitz verion is harder overall, but the ending of the original version with the staggered octaves is harder. I'm not referring to the cadenza, but the short segment after the cadenza (unless you consider this part of the cadenza)
matthew1722 2 years ago
ohhh ok man
i get you now :)
sorry
joshtorriero9 2 years ago
But the original version is almost imposible to play:S Kastle was mentioned to be the only pianist who played it allright, but even he screwed up one chord... the 9th. But besides that, it's a great piece:D
Btw, FreddieHowe, could you please send me the score?:)
MathijsGiltjes1993 2 years ago
Hey um which score is it? I have a couple and they are both the horowitz but both a little different to each olther. One has a few chords instead of single notes and seems a bit more accurate but its very hard to read. So yeah which copy do you have?
joshtorriero9 2 years ago
yes, I've seen the two versions: the Pellisorus edition and the Ukraine. This one here sounds a lot more like the Ukraine version, and I know it's hard to read. But Horowitz himself does a combination of the two versions, if you really anylize it, as I've done.
Alexias030692 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
FreddieHowe 3 years ago
good GOD....this version sounds so difficult that it sounds like it's being played by more than 1 pianist.....
ajlee1216 3 years ago
I have to agree with the comments about Lang Lang, I have no idea why they're getting so many thumbs down.
pinky0926 3 years ago
This is Arcadi VOlodos, not Horowits. Shut up if anybody haven't heard the recording of Volodos's. I have the recording and this is the one. if u don't know something, dont write a comment u stupid kids
laqin007 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
This is actually Horowitz playing it and not in fact Volodos! - FACT!
Jx
foxyjohnuk 3 years ago
Does this sound like 1953 sound quality to you? Horowitz only ever played it in that year.
cziffra1980 3 years ago 2
i was clearly wrong!
Whoops!
foxyjohnuk 3 years ago
This is the greatest solo piece ever played recorded by anyon ever.
johntle 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hmm... i prefer kissins version, but this one is also excellent. lang lang... long way to go
alexej1987 3 years ago
Don't compare Lang Lang to Volodos. Lang lang is nothing infront of Volodos i tell u
laqin007 3 years ago 6
Best version I've ever heard....!!
Hopefully everyone knows who is Lang Lang, isn't?...He plays this piece everytime he has performance...(just showing off his skills)..
But actually, he has such crappy skills....
Though he is a good comedian in front of the piano....but not a 100% good pianist.
chiushing1988 3 years ago
nicely said lol lol...
RomanticMusikFan 3 years ago
Thx...
In my point of view about Lang Lang:
1.) He is respect to the stages.
2.) He is respect to the audiences
3.) He is respect to the composers
4.) However, HE IS TOTALLY DISRESPECT TO THE PIANO....I know he is entertaining/attracting the audiences...but.....for a real musician...They love the music, as well as their INSTRUMENT.....
chiushing1988 3 years ago
well said once again lol....totally agree...
RomanticMusikFan 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
finally i meet people who really understand lang lang..
oestrophilia 3 years ago
???
matthew1722 3 years ago
Amazing rendition of beautifully composed and not less beautifully arrange piece. I don't know who is better, Horowitz or Volodos, in this piece and I don't think there's any sense in arguing about this. But I know that this performance was the first one which I heard of this piece. I had listened it many times before I heard Horowitz's one I was prepared for dissapointment because I couldn't imagine more perfect playing than Volodos'. Well, Horowitz's one just blew me away... LIVE!!!, 1953...
Spiritakis 3 years ago 2
I came into this expecting it to be rubbish, and came out undeniably gobsmacked. This is one of my favourite pieces so I was wary to hear a version that had been largely altered, but this was really great.
pinky0926 3 years ago
Complete re-writing of the Friska! OMG, what inventivity in the mix of voices, and incredible pianism from golden ages. He's definitely not the deepest musician on earth, but music definitely needs such folks.
romotchka 3 years ago
excellent job on the audio TysonMS. I really enjoyed this.
luganskymichelangeli 3 years ago
Can you hear his "friska"? I've NEVER heard it so clear. He surpasses Horowitz, in my opinion :)
DDRConquistador 3 years ago
he does
dorianmarkovac 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Horowitz is over-hyped.
Purenicotine 3 years ago
I totally agree, he has such control even if he plays very quiet he can emphasis the melody.
Peppynx01 3 years ago 2
This is the best performance!!!!!!
He is my favorite pianist!
superasian33 3 years ago