should be a goal, because if theres a power play and the defending team wants a whistle, he can just push the attacking player into the goaltender when someone from the point is about to do a one timer, doesnt make sense. the rule should be, IF AN ATTACKING PLAYER IS PUSHED INTO THE GOALTENDER OR THE NET BY THE DEFENDING PLAYER AT THE SAME TIME THE GOAL IS SCORED, IT SHOULD STAY. Because the attacking player knows he has to stay out of the crease at all times unless there's a puck.
Read an NHL rule book sometime. It clearly states that if an oppossing player proceeds in untouched or is pushed into the goaltender by a member of the opposing team, that the goal should should waved off. And if it is interference on the goaltender by the attacking player entering the crease on his own, a 2 minute goaltender interfernce penalty shall be acessed. If the defender pushes the player into the goaltender, the defender shall be given a 2 minute interfernce penalty.
The goaltender has got to be able to do his job. That is what is wrong with the new rules. Denfenders can't prevent players from crashing the goal to the extreme of making contact with the goaltender, without taking a hooking or holding penalty.
From a totally neutral perspective, I think this was a good call.
lumberjack5 1 year ago
MICK MGEOUGH THAT FAT BASTARD
chyguy333 3 years ago
should be a goal, because if theres a power play and the defending team wants a whistle, he can just push the attacking player into the goaltender when someone from the point is about to do a one timer, doesnt make sense. the rule should be, IF AN ATTACKING PLAYER IS PUSHED INTO THE GOALTENDER OR THE NET BY THE DEFENDING PLAYER AT THE SAME TIME THE GOAL IS SCORED, IT SHOULD STAY. Because the attacking player knows he has to stay out of the crease at all times unless there's a puck.
bludika 3 years ago
Read an NHL rule book sometime. It clearly states that if an oppossing player proceeds in untouched or is pushed into the goaltender by a member of the opposing team, that the goal should should waved off. And if it is interference on the goaltender by the attacking player entering the crease on his own, a 2 minute goaltender interfernce penalty shall be acessed. If the defender pushes the player into the goaltender, the defender shall be given a 2 minute interfernce penalty.
KillerOfFire1057 3 years ago 2
The goaltender has got to be able to do his job. That is what is wrong with the new rules. Denfenders can't prevent players from crashing the goal to the extreme of making contact with the goaltender, without taking a hooking or holding penalty.
KillerOfFire1057 3 years ago
NO GOAL
rpihockeyfan 3 years ago
Glenn Healy is such a dumb shit.
YuGiOh15X 3 years ago
IT WAS A GOAL!!!!ughh
mssnguyen 4 years ago
it should of counted
sens1fan 4 years ago
dumb call, he was pushed into the net and held there too. bs call
fcirc 4 years ago
bullshit! that supposed to be in.
Tchyngyz 4 years ago
from 1:17 to 1:22 the puck goes in on opposite side of vermette and he was held in, there was no interferance
duff0093 4 years ago
if you watch from 49 sec. on the puck goes in on the opposite side of vermette and he was held in as well, no interferance at all
duff0093 4 years ago
Yeah, no shit, but the call was good, because after he was pushed in he used his stick to interfere with DiPietro.
mountaindewitt 4 years ago
I don't even like the sens and I think thats the biggest bunch of bullshit I've seen this year.
Im gonna guess this is the NY side of the announcing?
SirPsychoSexy130589 4 years ago
no its the toronto calling (tsn)
katem32 4 years ago 3
it was a shit call!!!!!
katem32 4 years ago
IT WAS A CROSS-CHECK!!!!
katem32 4 years ago
vermette was shoved into the crease!
katem32 4 years ago