Id take a shit on that skanks face.Anyone who wants to remove another brick in the wall that is internet freedom needs to rounded up like the jew they are!FR@CK YOU SKANK BITCH!
I chose not to, because it does nothing positive for my life, I think all of you should go take a run, or lie in the sun, read a book, anything, just stop wasting your time hating others. Look in the mirror, and when you are perfect in your eyes, ask a friend (if you have one) if he or she thinks you are perfect too.
all of you people sound a little crazy over here. First of all we are all very familiar with the first amendment, but what you all do not know, is that the blogger posted defamatory things on this blog, those things where not highlighted by the press (as to not defame me again) and of course they were not as titillating as the names you all have so cleverly high lighted. So without all of the facts, you guys are arguing a mute point. So calling some one a name as an opinion is not defamation.
No, but I can spell at 1st grade level. Have you done any research, yourself, on what kind of woman she might be? Regardless of anything else, this ruling is a travesty of justice and a blight on our Constitution. Please don't ask insultingly stupid questions, be gone.
Well I've done some research, nothing wrong about her.
But after reading your meaningless and angry comment, I'm even more happy of this justice decision -and yes it was justice-, bullies and angry people like you now knows they are not above the law.
This issue is a hot one for me, I'll admit, and I attacked you personally for your comment, I'll admit that as well. The reason I am upset is because this country is no longer the home of the free and brave pioneers who built it, it's the land of the vindictive and petty, as you have clearly shown by implying I believe myself to be above the law. Your semantic twisting has failed. I am here to support the Bill of Rights, you self-destructive fool. Free speech is more important than your ego.
Ignorance is a worse adviser, I'm done with you, if you have no understanding of the 1st Amendment, and nothing I can say will change that. Go read a book.
in "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.Somehow I didn't see "Except If they don't like what you're saying, then they can be legally punished for expressing their opinion." If she doesn't like the fact that people can say what they want, she can GTFO of America.
Id take a shit on that skanks face.Anyone who wants to remove another brick in the wall that is internet freedom needs to rounded up like the jew they are!FR@CK YOU SKANK BITCH!
CONSTRINGACY 1 year ago
Oh yes, she does have that right. And it's about FUCKING time.
Majik47 2 years ago
i have ben called everything in the book
get over it and its somebody you know
there are people loosing jobs homes
free speech /you like the american money
get over it.
there is much more at stake these days
give me a fucking break
will not be working hear no more
just as well
you fucked youreself so be it
67636763 2 years ago
And just so you all know, I can name call too...
I chose not to, because it does nothing positive for my life, I think all of you should go take a run, or lie in the sun, read a book, anything, just stop wasting your time hating others. Look in the mirror, and when you are perfect in your eyes, ask a friend (if you have one) if he or she thinks you are perfect too.
liskulagc 2 years ago
all of you people sound a little crazy over here. First of all we are all very familiar with the first amendment, but what you all do not know, is that the blogger posted defamatory things on this blog, those things where not highlighted by the press (as to not defame me again) and of course they were not as titillating as the names you all have so cleverly high lighted. So without all of the facts, you guys are arguing a mute point. So calling some one a name as an opinion is not defamation.
liskulagc 2 years ago
Liskula Cohen is a skank, what's wrong with the truth?
No anonymity, no truth, and no justice. Speaking of justice....
Justice Joan Madden is the problem here.
Call her office to tell her what a travesty against the 1st amendment this is. Seriously, do it, over 9000 people already have.
(646) 386- 3314
snakepimp 2 years ago
What makes you say that?
Do you know her personaly?
cosmosspring 2 years ago
No, but I can spell at 1st grade level. Have you done any research, yourself, on what kind of woman she might be? Regardless of anything else, this ruling is a travesty of justice and a blight on our Constitution. Please don't ask insultingly stupid questions, be gone.
flyfishJJA 2 years ago
Well I've done some research, nothing wrong about her.
But after reading your meaningless and angry comment, I'm even more happy of this justice decision -and yes it was justice-, bullies and angry people like you now knows they are not above the law.
cosmosspring 2 years ago
This issue is a hot one for me, I'll admit, and I attacked you personally for your comment, I'll admit that as well. The reason I am upset is because this country is no longer the home of the free and brave pioneers who built it, it's the land of the vindictive and petty, as you have clearly shown by implying I believe myself to be above the law. Your semantic twisting has failed. I am here to support the Bill of Rights, you self-destructive fool. Free speech is more important than your ego.
flyfishJJA 2 years ago
You're totally mistaken. Anger is a bad adviser.
My point is, you can't use the first admenment to defame someone, it would be like giving more right to bullies like Port.
cosmosspring 2 years ago
Ignorance is a worse adviser, I'm done with you, if you have no understanding of the 1st Amendment, and nothing I can say will change that. Go read a book.
flyfishJJA 2 years ago
You're lame, ignorant and your agressivity is totally uncalled.
I'am happy I have nothing to do with you.
cosmosspring 2 years ago
in "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.Somehow I didn't see "Except If they don't like what you're saying, then they can be legally punished for expressing their opinion." If she doesn't like the fact that people can say what they want, she can GTFO of America.
sunset261 2 years ago
You got it all wrong .
Are you Rosemary Port?
cosmosspring 2 years ago
Ummm no, and how exactly did i get it all wrong? that IS the first amendment.
sunset261 2 years ago
Liskula Cohen is one ugly, nasty, angry post-menopausal has been. 40 my ass. She looks 50!
haboreh 2 years ago