Obama Crisis!!!

[ItsPalm]

How did the scrolling news not change with the other video changes?!

[HasnainM786]

fk u u beleive in the deval go fk urself

[youelite000]

Its like "Time is come to pay America" xD

[413XJ0N35154F4G]

Crisis? That depends on what the meaning of the word IS IS...

[911billabong]

you are the crisis you are the worest ever [uill the troops cut the crap kick his ass out he was not even born in the u.s.a. o im christain bs he's a muslim b who is a dumb ass like bush the 2.

[HoneySiegalSurvivor]

@911billabong just a crooked attorney moneylaundering Bre-X money through the fraudulent records of me deceased created in Arizona. I am his Watergate. He needs to resign now bigtime July 8/2010

[neondeion2002]

there he is america. the worst fucking president ever topping hover

[SHMUJEW]

you mean intolerance like the kind that obama has against jews? you mean the kind of intolerance that liberals have against taxpayers? What Racism is this that you speak of?

[williambellor]

I don't think that Obama is a saint by any stretch of the imagination, but there are plenty of legitimate reasons to oppose the guy that don't require calling the guy the "N-Word" as you chose to do in the posting I deleted. The bottom line is that I welcome debate here on Obama, his policies and his racism towards Jews or white people or anyone else he appears to hate, but I will not tolerate anyone demeaning him for his race.

The only place where two wrongs make a right is in U-Turns!

[Pattycakessmiles]

SHM! Right on, brother!

[williambellor]

I deleted "SHMUJEW's" comment because I will not tolerate racism on this page.

[ePhilosopher9]

We're on to your Cloward-Piven strategy to usher in socialism, a-hole! Now cut it out before we get the Pitchforks and Torches, ya scumbag!

[NateageIV]

lmao

[liveoutstanding]

Overhauling the nation's health care system is a bad idea... SAY NO!

[Mesina2]

He said Crisis 25 times, but he didn't fix any crisis at all.

[williambellor]

The Obama administration ha no interest in fixing any crisis's; they only want to take advantage of them so they can ram unpopular legislation down our throats while we are distracted by them.

Remember that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel recently said "Never allow a good crisis to go to waste".

Crisis's are good for one thing; distracting the public while you take their freedoms and liberties away!

[Mesina2]

Yeah.

I have to say this, those assholes did they job really good.

But still I have no respect to them and I still want them in 9th circle of hell.

[earwasel2]

Hmm,

Everything you just said can also be applied to George Bush after 9/11.

Funny, huh?

[TedVoron]

He got a Nobel Peace Prize of $1.3 Million for NOT solving one single crisis

[Mesina2]

I just read it on my newspaper.

I was like: HOW THE FUCK THIS RASCIST PIECE OF SHIT THAT WAGE WAR AGAINST AFGHANISTAN AND PLANS TO INVADE PAKISTAN AND IRAN GET'S NOBEL PRICE FOR PEACE?!

[jeffsond]

Youre right William. We need the Govt out of every part of our lives. They are to serve us, not rule us

[williambellor]

Well said!

[joppman845]

what a clown!

[Politeama]

Didn't Obama say that when he became president the war in Iraq was going to end and the gas price down? Well, I am waiting. Where I live the gas price has been going up since Obama took office.

[williambellor]

With gas prices, Obama is beginning to learn that the President doesn't really have that power; unless he nationalizes the oil companies to. With Iraq, he knows that if we stand down before the Iraqi government is ready to stand up, it will be a blood bath in Iraq. He had no problem with that happening during the Bush administration, but it ain't gonna happen on his watch.

Bush did things because he thought they were the right thing to do. Obama does things because they're politically expedient.

[mr82769]

What it is with you and gas prices?! Use a bike or take the bus. Thats what ppl around the world are doing.

[williambellor]

My work is 30 miles from my house and mass transit takes about 3 hours each way to reach it's destination.

[mr82769]

Its probably tax deductible. So ppl who actually use their car for beneficial purposes can pay less and those who use it for leisure purposes will pay more. So if wont hurt those who are pendling like yourself but those who got 5 miles for work might use their bike leading to positive externalities.

[williambellor]

The words "Tax Deductible" are incompatible with Obama's grand plan for us. Besides, why would he provide relief to people suffering from high gas prices; high gas prices are what he wants so he can ween us off the use of fossil fuels and into green vehicles. The reason green vehicles aren't more common is due to their high cost, so the only solution is to drive up the cost of gas. Giving tax relief to people using gas vehicles would undermine that goal. Not gonna happen!

[mr82769]

If its tax deductible in Denmark then it can be anywhere in the world. But yes.. higher gas prices are necessary. If every person in the world used as much energy as the average American we would need 5 earths. You consume too much. WAY too much.

[williambellor]

If high fuel prices are such a good thing, why did Liberals complain about them when W was in office? One other thing, if America was as unproductive as the rest of the world, there would be a permanent global depression or a global dictatorship. There's plenty of power in the world if we choose to use it. Nuclear power is plentiful!

[mr82769]

Im not partou on Obamas side. Anyone complaining about high gas prices should come to Europe and take a look at what we pay. If you have a preference for going by car you just have to accept that youre gonna pay for other ppl education, healthcare and possibly even for R&D into green technology.

30 years ago we increased taxes on oil and gas and used the money to invest in R&D on wind energy. Now Vestas is the leader in the market and we earn millions and millions.

[williambellor]

I was in Europe in the mid 80's and even then, gas prices were 2-3 time higher than what we paid. I'm all for new green technology but the research needs to be done by the private sector because their research will have to work and will have to be economical to produce. The government has no special expertise to select the best green technology, so while they may stumble to the right answer eventually, they will have wasted an enormous researching many options that simply aren't viable.

[williambellor]

I can give you an example of this. A couple of years ago, Congressmen & Senators from a number of farming states pushed a bill through the government forcing petroleum companies to add ethanol to the nations fuel supply & began subsidizing farmers to grow corn for ethanol production. The result was zero reduction in fuel prices, but a noticeable increase in food prices when farmers stopped growing food corn because fuel corn paid better. This created shortages which drove food prices higher.

[williambellor]

Since most politicians have never run a business, they have no experience or even knowledge of the law of supply and demand. As a result they will make decisions for us without really understanding the consequences of those decisions. Private entrepreneurs are less likely to invest in new technologies unless they are confident in seeing a return on their investment which results in green R&D being more effective & more efficient. There are no limits to how much money the government can waste.

[williambellor]

Regarding wind technology, I think it is a good idea, but not the solution to the problem of energy costs. What do you do when the wind isn't blowing? And don't you resent the fact that your economy has been crippled for 30 years in order to invest in a wind turbine company? I think that wind technology is a good supplement but it should be developed by a private company so we will know what the real cost is before we adopt the technology.

[williambellor]

Government involvement in Vestas makes it hard to determine the value of the technology because government subsidies skew the cost to benefit analysis. Who wants to invest in some new technology when you don't even know what the true costs are?

[mr82769]

Sometimes the initial research will not be done by the market because the knowledge can be copied by competitors with no cost (knowledge that cant be copyrighted). Then the R&D wont be done. Then a state or some non-competitive institution will have to do the initial work.

With regards to the higher fuel prices then its because its taxed. Then we drive less, the incentive to invest in green technology is higher while the tax revenue can be invested also. But "picking the winner" IS a problem.

[AzNpWn3R]

Instead of using crisis, He should give speeches like president Roosevelt, boosting the moral of the American people. Roosevelt, elected in 1932 and inaugurated March 4, 1933, primarily blamed the excesses of big business for causing an unstable bubble-like economy. Democrats believed the problem was that business had too much money, and the New Deal was intended as a remedy, by empowering labor unions and farmers and by raising taxes on corporate profits.

[williambellor]

Obama doesn't really want to fix this problem; at least not during his first term. He & his administration have said a few times that they don't want to let a good crisis go to waste. He knows that most Americans don't want Socialism here, but many will tolerate it if they are told that it will solve the crisis! It is clear that Obama wants to extend this recession past 2012 so he can impose as much of his radical Marxism as possible onto the nation. What happens next doesn't matter to him!

[bdlfourtwenty]

Socialism!Marxism!Communism!TY­RANNY!! BOO!

You would think that after the last two election cycles conservative would realize that fear mongering doesn't work.

Please define how we are now "Socialist". Is it the 3% tax hike on the top bracket? Maybe 36% under Bush is considered "free market capitalism" and 39% under Obama is "socialism"? What exactly is the cutoff? 37% or 38%?

Conservatives often speak in vague sentences about the "direction" of the country without providing specifics.

[williambellor]

Socialism is when the government takes control of the banks. Socialism is when government voids contracts to take away bonuses from people who've earned them. Socialism is when government begins deciding what kind of salaries executives should get. Socialism is when government takes control of private sector businesses like it did with GM.

Socialism may be the change that Obama believes in, but that is not an opinion most people in America share with him.

[bdlfourtwenty]

You are just plain wrong.

Socialism is a system of social organization that advocates government ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

Limiting pay for execs recieving tax dollars for poor performance is not "socialism".

Assisting in the removal of a CEO that pissed away tax dollars is not "socialism".

Giving big banks a "loan" is not socialism. Wait, didn't Bush execute the original TARP?

[mr82769]

You can go quite a bit to the left and still not end up with socialism. And "radical Marxism"? Either you believe his theory or you dont.

If you do not aknowledge that the market isnt perfect then youre just as ignorant as a communist. Total control doesnt work but neither does total freedom (plz do not dumb this comment down).

[williambellor]

You can believe in Marxism and apply it is small doses and it's still Marxist. If you put a drop of aids infected urine in a gallon of clean water, would you want to drink it? Neither woudl I!

I never said that the market place is perfect, but it will always be my best option because the people decide what is right for them rather than a government bureaucracy deciding on your behalf. It's called freedom and it will always be a better option that any 'ism.

[mr82769]

First off. AIDS wont infect me even if I drank a gallon of infected blood. But no I dont drink urine if I can help it.

And youre against the government taking over banks. What do you suggest should happen instead? Let in go bankrupt and ppl lose their money? What would then happen you think?

[williambellor]

Talk to your doctor before drinking that gallon of aids infected blood!

Banks who made risky loans should suffer the consequences of their foolish decisions & go out of business. The FDIC would cover the loses for the people & only the banks making the most bad loans would go under. I would take it a step further though; politicians who forced the banks to make the risky loans should be removed from office & convicted. It's not the governments business to tell banks who to give money to.

[mr82769]

If the infected blood doesnt go into my bloodstream im perfectly safe. Anybody +15 years of age should know that by now.

And the worst banks are going under. 45 in the US so far. No politicians forced anybody to give out bad loans. The banks got greedy and only legislative steps will ever stop that. So more government plz.

The reason banks were saved was partly because if too many banks would go under they would stop lending each other money being a lot more costly. Bush started this.

[williambellor]

Go on believing that about aids blood if you want, it's irrelevant because it isn't the subject, it's an analogy! The point is that any level of Marxism is a bad thing and should be avoided. The moment we allow the government in to address a problem that we should address on our own, the more likely we are to repeat that process with the next problem. More government control is always a bad thing!

[williambellor]

As for greedy banks, banks are in business to make a profit and they do that by loaning people money and getting paid back. How does a bank make profit by loaning money to people who can't pay them back? That's not greed, that's stupid!

If one or two banks made a stupid decision, I could write it off as stupid, but they all did it and they all did it as the same time. How do you explain that???

[williambellor]

What really happened is Democrats! Look up "The Community Reinvestment Act of 1979", then look up Bill Clinton's & Janet Reno's part in the whole mess. Then look at the video in my "favorites" section called "Shocking Video Unearthed Democrats in their own words Covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Scam that caused our Economic Crisis" & you will see Democrats like Barney Frank & Maxine Waters blocking Republican efforts to sound the alarm about this mess in 2004. Nope, nothing to see here!

[williambellor]

As for your belief that the government will save us, I don't know what that confidence is based on. What has the government ever done that leads you the believe that they can manage anything?

Social Security - going bankrupt!

Medicare - going bankrupt!

Post Office - a disaster!

DMV - exactly the model to copy for healthcare.

Go ahead and name something that the government does well because I'm at a loss!

[williambellor]

You accuse business people of being greedy, but somehow believe that politicians are immune to greed! I'd rather have to deal with greedy businesses because I can at least choose not to do business with them if I disagree with how they do things. Try refusing to pay your taxes because you disagree with the job that your government is doing!

If you do, say hi to Bernie Madoff for me!

[mr82769]

Im not American so I cant say anything about that without being a hypocrite. But here the roads work, we can go to the hospital when we´re sick and we get a free education.

Maybe these things could be better if we let private entrepreneurs control it but the outcome would be worse in the way that poor ppl would have limited access creating a society of A and B ppl.

[mr82769]

Imagine you lend X amount of dollars to some guy. Its good times so why not? Next time he comes by and want more you take a look at his financial situation and you say: "No, I wont... You wont be able to repay me". He goes: Well... ok... Ill just go to some other bank and if I go bankrupt you wont get your initial money anyway."

The banks outplayed each other and we need the government to find some rules for the banks to play by.

[mr82769]

Government control is necessary sometimes. The market has flaws and there are bad outcomes and social dilemmas that only the government can improve on.

How will you as a single person address and avoid a run on a bank? Or that the banks simply stopped lending out money to you or our bank?

(And I know it was an analogy x( ... But my argument still stands. Unless I have some tear in my mouth or throat the blood / vira would be destroyed by my stomach acids).

[williambellor]

You may not be an American, but you have some experience living in a Socialist country, so you're opinions are welcome here, but that doesn't mean that I'm not going to debate you. Your profile says you are 25 years old, so that is probably a factor in your positive opinion of socialized healthcare. As a young person, you have many productive years ahead of you and not very many health problems. Under those circumstances, socialized healthcare sounds like a good idea.

[williambellor]

Free medical care that you don't have to pay for! The trap of socialized medicine comes when you get older; don't have as many productive years ahead of you & your health problems increase. Ask your grand parents what they would think if they were diagnosed with cancer & had to wait 9-12 months to get chemo-therapy? Or broke their hip and had to wait 2-3 years for hip-replacement surgery. Or had Breast Cancer and were told that their prognosis is too low to warrant the cost of lifesaving drugs.

[williambellor]

There is also the issue of medical advancements. When you remove the profit motive of healthcare, you remove the incentive to develop new drugs & technologies for the future. Name one single medical advance (drugs, new technologies or new procedures) that have come out of a socialized healthcare system. I could spend months listing new technologies that have come from America's private pharmaceutical and research companies. What will happen to medical research if America goes Socialist?

[williambellor]

I'm not saying that America is better than Denmark because I don't believe that, but a free-market economy is always superior to a government controlled one. I also disagree with your argument that a private run system has less quality than a government controlled one. A private run business has to convince its customers to do business with them & if they provide poor service, their customers will go to the competition who offers better service. You can't do that when you only have one option.

[williambellor]

As for the poor being left out of a capitalist system, Capitalism offers the poor far more opportunities than any other system in the world. In a Capitalist system, there is opportunity for anyone who has a good idea to turn that idea unto piles of money which helps them to rise above being poor. As for the poor not having access to healthcare, that's simply not true because no hospital can refuse to treat someone due to their inability to pay.

[williambellor]

You also mention an example of a person borrowing money from a bank and then going back for more money, being denied the second time and going elsewhere for their loan. If the government isn't telling banks who they must loan money to, the banks will make their loan decisions based on the ability of the borrower to pay them back. I Bank A refuses the loan and Bank B allows the loan, the wisdom of the decision will decide which bank survives and which one doesn't.

[williambellor]

That is a vastly superior option to the government telling banks that they must make more loans to poor people who lack the ability to pay them back, then forcing quasi-government agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to underwrite those bad loans. The media may like to blame this whole mess on lack of regulation, but lack of regulation doesn't encourage banks to make loans to people who can't pay them back. If we want to fix the crisis, the answer is to get government out of the process.

[williambellor]

As for your questions about what happens when banks stop lending money; that is what is happening now due to government interference. The US government just bailed out the banks and banks are still not making loans. But since the government is the trigger of this whole mess, all banks are refusing to make loans. If government stayed out of the mess and one of two banks stopped loaning money, the remaining banks would pick up the slack and the money would still be flowing.

[williambellor]

As for people making runs on the bank, if the government didn't make so many disastrous decisions on behalf of the banks, then the trigger of a bank run would only effect one bank rather than the whole system. Bank A makes a stupid decision that causes its customers panic, it won't effect Bank B, but when the government makes stupid decisions that effect all banks, the panic will be industry wide!

[mr82769]

Im not saying the state should take over. But the state has to ensure that market failures are dealt with. I will never ever (in ANY instance) claim that one extreme is superior. Its always something in between that works.

[mr82769]

And now youre just getting off-track. Socialized medicine and the firms that develop medicine are two different things. Nowhere in the western world will you find any reasonable politician claiming that the state will be better at developing medicine than private entrepreneurs.

[mr82769]

There are long waits but not that long. And here when a drug is deemed cost-effective it will be used. The doctor should not think in the lines of whether a person is "worthy" enough to be given a drug. I dont think it like that anywhere ...

[mr82769]

As a young person shouldnt I be against it given I should be less exposed to sickness in general? And the reason we got it is not some altruistic purpose alone (even though that is also a factor). A sick person getting cured can return to the labor market faster meaning increased tax income for the state.

Roughly the same goes for free education. Higher level of skill = better payed job = more tax income.

[lyndilou0806]

This man will go down as the WORST President in our history. He will destroy America as we know it and sleep at night. We need to educate America so they understand what this man plans to do to our country. People seem to think Govt needs to take care of our daily lives because they think it comes for free. After living in a nanny state in Europe for 4 yrs. I am here to tell you it's not free & your tax will rise and your freedom will be gone. Stop Obama! Prepare to protest before it's too late.

[150zenner]

well....thats why you should live in Canada.

[lyndilou0806]

I am sorry - I do not get it. Why should I live in Canada? I am fighting against socialized medicine and last time I checked Canada has socialized medicine.

[mr82769]

I cant predict the future but... Bush is the worst so far right? Lowering taxes and increasing spending he certainly must atleast as bad as Obama. So far he has a lot less blood on his hands too.

[lyndilou0806]

Well, I disagree - Obama is going to go down as the worst President because of his attempt to turn America into a minumum of a social democracy to the worst a communist state. Obama is trying to change the very foundation of America which does not need to happen. Also, keep in mind - Obama has only been in office a few short months and has already spent more than any other President in history. AMERICA - DOES NOT NEED TO BE REMADE. Obummer must go!!

[mr82769]

You cant become a communist state overnight. And with all those loons carrying guns its impossible. Stop worrying. Its not gonna happen.

What you Americans need to do is start caring about how you all can be better off and not just yourself as an individual.

(Btw thanks for not being the average dickhead throwing around insult - almost rare these days.)

[lyndilou0806]

I agree with the insult comment totally. So, right back at you - thanks for no insults. I have been called every name in the book and what makes me laugh is they do not even know the person they are insulting. Have a good day.

[lyndilou0806]

One thing I forgot to mention - I think American do care for others. You can see that in our charitable givings - but what is happening now - is those who do work hard are going to start paying for those who are VERY capable of working. Obama wants to develop a class of people sitting around waiting for a govt. handout in order to get re-elected. His plan is to decrease the amount of taxpayers and increase the amount of tax receipients. I look forward to 2012!

[mr82769]

In Denmark you get "activated" if youre young, got no disabilities and dont have a job. You get lame jobs like cutting the grass for elderly and such. This means that you might aswell get a job a make real money with something you like. Copy that. Most ppl that are lazy dont know how a well a job can make them feel and the end of a day.

(We have our problem with benefits for semi-old citizens so Im not trying to make Denmark out to be some Utopia).

[lyndilou0806]

I just got back from 4 years in Europe. I lived in Belgium, Holland, France and England. In Holland I noticed a good % of the people were on a govt. program. The computer tech who came to my house told me it did not pay to go to work. It was better to sit on your butt allowing the govt to take care of you. That scares me - this is what I do not want for USA. We have always been workers & under Obama I do not know anymore. Many here are getting fed up with Obama & his push towards socialism.

[libertyandlife]

Ahhh - but now that he's spent a few trillion just as he'd planned, the crisis suddenly isn't there. Things aren't as bad as he'd thought. Does he really think we didn't see this coming?

[williambellor]

Pay no attention tot he fact that a large percentage of the money went to pork spending and not to correcting our economy!

But everything will be fine, we will still leave the door open for another bailout bill; possible around the time of the next election...

[Craigbe]

If you don't accept responsibility for this CRISIS...

You're a RACIST!

[JimmyJackJohnnyJose]

The Govt. RAISES TAXES IN THE MILLIONS $999,999,999

The Govt. SPENDS IN THE BILLIONS  $999,999,999,999

The Govt. GOES INTO DEFICIT IN THE TRILLIONS $999,999,999,999,999

STOP BIG GOVERNMENT NOW!!! DON'T LET EM WASTE YOUR HARD EARNED MONEY!!!!

[williambellor]

With interest the people will be on the hook for quadrillions $999,999,999,999,999,999

A wise person once said that the problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people money!

[Jgrado1]

It doesn't look good.

[bedlambikes]

Our children will never experience the freedom and democracy we once enjoyed...and that saddens me.

[lyndilou0806]

I agree with you 100%. I feel if everyone keeps voicing their unhappiness about what is going on in America we can change course. Join these protests, call your congressman and Senator and make sure you get involved in the 2010 election process. If we band together we can send Obama a message that America DID NOT vote for socialism. The goal for us is to educate the Obama voters who clearly did not understand socialism exactly what will happen to America if we keep headed to the far left.

[armyhellion13]

HYPE Not Hope. NObama - Keep your socialist commie change you hypocritical liar. Are you even a natural born American?

[williambellor]

I am truly afraid for this country!

After the election, I told myself to hold my breath & we would correct this problem in the 2010 election. I also told myself that Obama couldn't possibly be as bad a president as many of us feared, but we were wrong, he's worse! As I write this, the DOW is down another 200 points; that's about 3000 points since he was elected. At this rate I don't think we have 2 years. To the business community & most thinking Americans, there's no one steering the ship.

[williambellor]

Even our enemies smell blood in the water.

Before the election I bought a T-shirt that says:

Obama in '08

Osama in '09

At the time I thought it was just a joke, but it may actually come to pass!

God help us all!

[armyhellion13]

I could not agree more fellow patriot!

[saintpeeter]

That's some real Hopenchange.

Is this possible constitutionally, (since there are 47months left in the term)?

1. Obama gracefully resigns as president. (to save Western Civilization from Him)

2. Biden becomes president and chooses Bill Clinton as VP.

3. Biden resigns as president in 2011 and Bill Clinton becomes President for 2 years.

4. Newt Gingrich and Hillary Clinton face off in 2012.

5. Obama writes another self-congratulatory autobiography while organizing soup lines all across America.

[williambellor]

Sounds great, except that constitutionally Bill Clinton could not be VP because one of the responsibilities of VP is that they be able to fill in for the President should the President become incapacitated and Bill Clinton has already termed out.

You also forgot step 6; Newt Gingrich defeats Hillary in the largest landslide in history; restoring sanity to the US Government and resulting in permanent peace on Earth.

Other than that it is a good start!

[loonmaniac]

Bush was disconnected from reality, he was a great cheerleader.

[williambellor]

He may have been disconnected from Liberal reality, but everyone knows that Liberal reality only makes sense when you are sitting in a circle passing the joint around. The problem is that Liberal reality becomes a bad joke with no punch line once the smoke clears.

George Bush lives in a place the rest of us call "Real Reality" and from that location, he was a Great President! Compare the actions of Obama who, if he doesn't do an about face right away will certainly be the worst President ever!

[loonmaniac]

So how's Karl Rove's "permanent Republican majority" working out for you guys?

[williambellor]

Not so well since some Republicans began acting like Democrats and lost the support of their party. Lately, however, things have been looking up because Barack Obama is crashing and burning as President, virtually guaranteeing that he will follow Carters example and become a single term President, making way for a Republican sweep in 2010 & 2012.

How's Nancy Pelosi's "Most Ethical Congress" working out for you guys?

[SilentiumWoodFilms]

Ha.. Ethical And Congress are "Polar Ice Caps Not Melting" opposites..

See "Capitalist March On Washington" on youtube and maybe we can talk about it to her injected face.

[MisterYin]

fox and other stations should stop taking soundbites from people because it's always taken out of context. Bush and all his republican pals were always saying 9/11, but they had a point to make each time they said it. Leave the man alone...it's barely been a month since he took office

[williambellor]

It's love to give the guy the benefit of the doubt, but he has made so many missteps in one month that it is impossible to remain silent. It would be irresponsible for me to watch my country driving full speed towards the cliff without saying "STOP"! President Obama has yet to learn that he & his cabinet's words have consequences & that his continuous use of alarmist rhetoric is causing great damage. First & foremost, the President must be a cheerleader for the country. Obama isn't doing that!

[williambellor]

I deleted queueupladeez's comment because I will not tolerate racism here!

[BlazinBillUSN]

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.

Thomas Jefferson

[williambellor]

Isn't it funny how these men from hundreds of years ago were smarter than many people today. They were able to come up with solutuions to problems they could not even imagine in their day!

[williambellor]

Someone marked this as spam.

I don't think it is spam, but it probably should have been posted as a video response rather than a text response.

[NiteSkyLookr]

After 9/11 and the economy took a Trillion Dollar hit the media hounded Bush on "quick action" to fix the economy. They asked how was he paying for the "Tax Cut" and they were all upset about the debt and deficit. Well not anymore.

While Bush said the road was tough he at least spoke possitive and had faith of what the country could do. The Obama speaks we're all doomed, we're all losers and we can't function without him and the goverment. Hope my ass!

[williambellor]

...and when Bush did his thing, he lowered taxes and the economy rebounded quickly. He managed to salvage our economy after that terrible day and keep us safe for the balance of his two terms. Those are just two of the many reasons I think that history will be kind to George W. Bush. Anyone really think that Obama nationalizing the banks, the auto industry, the healthcare system and God knows what else, will have the same effect on our economy? I didn't think so!

[Yggdrasill4]

Kind of reminds me on how Rudy Juliane and Bush repetitivly used "9/11", and "terrorist", in their own speeches.

[williambellor]

...the only difference being that 9/11 and the terrorists are real threats to our country while the mortgage crisis is simply being exaggerated and exploited by Obama & Co. in order to consolidate power for the Democrats for decades to come.

[MarkG45]

haha, oh god, i cant stop lolling at you republicans, you made this bed. there is no way obama is getting reelected, and then what? what are you going to do when obama gets his second term? hes going to spend the first term cleaning up bushs shit, and the second term he is going to say is a mandate, and give us some awesome national healthcare. obama is awesome

[williambellor]

Obama is only 4 weeks into his presidency and he is already the worst president ever. The Dow has dropped more than 2000 points since his election and his approval rating has dropped more than 20% in that time. It is fun to blame Bush for our economy, but the truth is that it is the Democrats who forced mortgage companies to give loans to people who couldn't afford them and that cause this entire mess.

[BlazinBillUSN]

The masses don't seem to get this. The election was all about getting rid of Bush and not electing the only real choice. Instead they voted in the least qualified candidate in the history of the USA. He proceded to return the Clinton regime to power by bring back all their staff. Watch what you ask for, because we will all now suffer for the general populations lack of education and understanding of history.

[williambellor]

It's a lot more fun to blame the crisis on greedy mortgage companies, but I've never understood this argument. Mortgage companies make a profit by giving loans to people and then having those people pay them back with interest. If the people can't pay back their loans, the mortgage companies don't make money, they lose money. That doesn't sound like greed to me, that sounds like stupidity.

[williambellor]

If one mortgage company did this, I might be able to write it off a stupidity, but when they all did it at the same time, there has to be a bigger explanation, you know, like Democrats suing mortgage companies for not giving loans to people who can't afford them. But, like I said, it's a lot more fun to blame this on greedy mortgage companies than it is to blame the political party of the messiah!

[BlazinBillUSN]

Like global warming...really the natural warming then cooling o the earth, the economy is just adjusting itslf to years of overspending by both government and people. No one party can take the blame. Bush is not to blame nor Barney Franks, but both ha hands in the problem. Just like "Global Warming", we need to be hands off and let the market adjust itself. I fhte big three go out of business, it was meant to be. IF banks fails it was meant to be. Government should be "Hands Off".

[williambellor]

Agreed, freedom means allowing business to freedom to succeed or fail. If they succeed, their reward is massive profits and survival, but if they fail, they go out of business, someone else come in, learns from their mistakes, does the job better and succeeds. That's the American Way!

It's funny how Liberals believe in the Darwinian theory "Survival Of The Fittest" when it comes to nature, but reject it in the business world.

[MarkG45]

yea its also funny how liberals believe sooooo blindly in atomic theory that opposite subatomic particles attract one another, but they cant seem to apply it correctly to love! lol, silly liberals and theyre "science"

[williambellor]

I'm sorry man, I'm not sure what point your attempting to make. My recommendation is that you lay off the crack pipe for a couple of days, wait for your head to clear and try posting again!

[MarkG45]

all im saying is that i cant wait for obama to pass the freedom of choice act, and outlaw any state restrictions on abortion. i will be watching your videos for weeks afterwards while you cry and claw at the air at how impotent the conservative party has become.

[williambellor]

Since the constitution says nothing (pro or con) on the issue of abortion, the question should be left to the states to decide and any federal law that prevents the states from making up their own mind on this issue (including Roe vs. Wade) is clearly unconstitutional. But why should you care about the Democrats engaging in another unconstitutional power grab. They've already done it so many times. Besides, each aborted baby is one less uninformed Democrat voter in 18 years.

[SirKronan]

You are a very scary and sick person, unless you're being sarcastic. Liberal, republic, or conservative, abortion is a choice that can be made BEFORE the baby is even conceived. Don't want a kid? Don't have sex, or at least use the best protection you can. Our society is pushing the mentality that there is no responsibility for our actions. We can mismanage a company, but instead of the CEO and crappy management taking the hit, the government will give them bailout money.

[MarkG45]

so a child is a punishment for a sin? right. this is why I am so fucking glad we got you christians out of the white house. What's that? You got AIDS? too bad for you, you shouldn't have had sex. Go die in a gutter. your compassionate representation of your religion makes me sick, and glad I am atheist

[apwman]

So I should pay for someones aids, cancer, and emphysema? I think not. Hey, I have the flu send me fifty buck for some medicine...I bet. I stepped on a nail and need a tetnus shot send me some money. I tried to kill myself with pills and have an ER bill send me money.

If someone gets AIDS its their problem not mine. Sick of this bleeding heart B.S. And please dont talk to me about babies born with aids. Thanks to B.O. I abort four babies with each day of hard work I do through taxes.

[MarkG45]

yea? it sucks having compassion for other human beings, isnt it? why dont you fuck off to iran then instead. you and the other 13% percent of america that hasnt already agreed with obama. youre in the minority. and thanks to bush, youre going to stay down there for a very very long time. enjoy your socialized medicine, you can thank me while you cry over your mother dying of cancer

[Dakotaagate]

the end of freedom comes when people realize they can vote themselves money

[ZioNefTea1]

OBAMA Misquotes Rosevelt in his Expanding Crisis Campaign: "THE ONLY THING WE HAVE... IS FEAR ITSELF!!"

[BlazinBillUSN]

I wonder WHO voted for this guy? 100 days in and we are all getting really scared. Socialized medicine, socialized banking, tax rebates to people who have never paid taxes....someone is definitely asleep at the wheel. Last patriot out of the country please bring the flag...

[rainydays925]

lol @ BlazinbillUSN

my thoughts exactly...

[NiteSkyLookr]

Can you say, "Yes We Can....Not!!"

Can you hear the "Hope....Not!!!"

Can you feel the "Excitment....Not!!!"

Can you see the "Change....Yea and May God Help Us All!!!"

[williambellor]

I can see the change; it's what is left of my paycheck once Obama has taken his share.

[JackSpratt60]

I can't believe how depressing this guy is. What a letdown. Every time he opens his mouth, the market craps out for two days. FDR said the only thing we had to fear was fear itself. Obama wants everybody in fear. He's turning out to be a major bummer.

[ThoughtOnFire21]

A Crisis Messiah Complex

[killergames187]

Obama is a lying Bush number 2!!!

[kfrost06]

is this the "hope and change" you assholes voted for?

[blake1125]

The difference  between the word terror and crisis is that the word TERROR was and is REAL!!

Even Clinton told him in the news to Tone it down!!! This guy president needs to shut the hell up!!

[williambellor]

Dick Morris wrote a great column today that addresses this issue. He explained that Obama is still in campaign mode. When you are the opposition party running for President, everything is a disaster or a crisis because that is how you get elected. Now that he is the President, Obama must move out of that mode and begin talking up the economy. Who is going to invest in our economy when even the President is preaching gloom & doom. If Obama wants to turn things around, he must be more positive.

[williambellor]

...Well that and stop being a Socialist!

[blake1125]

I agree with that William. This has to stop quick. The other side of the coin is he needs to say that the White House is NOT looking to nationalize the banks. In the press briefing today Gibbs would not say those exact words. KInda scary!! Ok not kind of... IT IS SCARY!!!

[williambellor]

I agree with you about not nationalizing the banks, but I would not trust him even if he said he wouldn't do this. Obama doesn't have the best track record so far for keeping his promises. No lobbyists in his administration, Bipartisanship, 48 hour review period of all new bills, no pork in the stimulus bill; broken promises, one and all!

[AssHatSockPuppet]

In over his head. Time for Obama to get someone to write "smarter" words on the teleprompter for him to read.

[ChairmanZero]

Jesus Crisis this guys full of shit.

[davitals]

Crisis ahhhhhhhhh... Underwater, Uhhhhhhhhhhh...crisis, Underwater, Change, uhhh...ahhhh...crisis uhhhh... Underwater, Hope uhhh ahhhhh Change, Stimulus, crisis ahhhh...stimulus uhhhhhh...change...uhhhhhh...e­grrrrrrrrrr...crisis,crisis,cr­isis...uhhhhhhh...ahhhhh...

It's America's Fault!!!!! ahhhhhh...aaaaahhh...crisis,st­imulus,bailout ahhhhh...uhhhhhhhh !!!!!!!!!!

Typical Faux-bama Speech........

[SCMtns66]

Since the election of a "wealth speading" imbecile on November 4th, 2008 the markets has gone down 3000 pts.

BS talks, but money walks. And each time that Obama speaks or unveils one of his marvelous ideas to wide acclaim by his concubine at NBC, CBS and CNN, the market has dropped another 500 pts. 

Of course, this will mean nothing to the Welfare Americans who are Obama's supporters.

[capitalistdingo]

For someone who is supposed to be such an eloquent speaker (as long as the teleprompter works) he certainly could use a vocabulary expansion.

[nwosigns]

Interesting, is that the new phrase to replace the old "terror" from Bush?

Nice vid.

[kramnosissom]

Everything connected with Barry aka "Obama is a crisis.He wants to scare everyone to gain support for his socialist agenda.You want to know what the real crisis is?We have a phony in the White House.A former citizen of Indonesia who has spent $800,000 by hiring 3 law firms to prevent anyone from seeing his longform birth certificate and his college transcript from Occidental that would reveal his nationality and if he was receiving aid as a foreign student.What do you think he's hiding?