I'm not writing about overunity. A motor built from PM's only is not an overunity situation. The motor is built with the fuel as part of the apparatus. PM's contain magnetic energy that can be converted into other forms of energy/motion. Home generators use the magnetic energy of PM's, coils of copper and some electronics to make usable electric energy. I'm not going to go so far as to tell you how my motor works until my patent goes through, but my permanent magnet only motor works.
PM's can produce continuous motion, I have a design of my own that works without cams or lever arms. PM's have potential energy one just needs to discover how to harness it. They have a magnetic field just like an electromagnet. EM's are used in power generators for use in cities which produce megawatts of power. When one moves a PM through a coil of wire magnetic energy is converted to electric energy. It is a fact of physics that magnets 'permanent or electro' have energy.
@esmannr when you move them, yes. But where does the overunity come from? That is the question that is as yet unresolved. The scientific formula is missing. So the engineers can't do anything until we have definitive proof og OU.
@esmannr - it is not a fact of physics that permanent magnets have energy. They only have a field that allows electric currents to be induced. Moving a magnet does not cause "magnetic energy" to be converted to electric energy. The kinetic energy applied to a magnet is transferred via its field to induce current in a coil.
Why do you have to wrap the a magnets with electric tape. When you do this it looks like you are faking your video. Can you make a video without the tape? Then I might believe what you are doing.
@jimsanders1 it doesn't matter whether you believe me or not. I don't care. They are taped so that I don't have to glue the small kitchen kabinet magnets together. In later versions, i stick them to the plate underneath so that you can see them more clearly. Please look for my other video's.
Shouldn't this video be called "Proposed free energy motor". I have been looking at all the supposed free energy videos and none delivers what the title suggests. There are a few obvious fakes. Let's ignore the laws of physics for a minute, can someone tell me how these magnetic motors are supposed to work. I know magnets don't have energy (that can be transferred to produce motion) so what is supposed to make these rotors spin? I am serious, I really need a clear explanation.
@LiamXaoh At present I am researching the combination of gravity and magnetism with this disc. There might be a natural interaction between the two that has been overlooked. In fact we are looking for a law of time energy combining the basic forces of the universe.
My research proves that almost all overunity devices draw their extra energy from the potential energy of the local gravitational field. And to describe them in full scientific detail, it is required to revise the Maxwells equations of Electromagnetism to no-linear equations, and Einstein's theory of gravitation. So for the academic world to account for them it is required 1-3 nobels...
No arrangement of permanent magnets by themselves can produce continuous motion, whether in a straight line, or in a circle. The magnetic field of force is a conservative field. The use of 'actuators' by way of lever arms or cam mechanisms doesn't work either. The motor never has enough torque to 'actuate' them. Permanent magnets are not a source of energy.
@scasired I know magnetic force is conservative. The idea is that different basic forces together may create energy from the necessary time difference between the two. The entire movement of the universe is based upon the restlessness of the basic natural forces. So magnetism combined with gravity like Finsrud seems to have developed might work..... and according to the equivalence principle one may also use a flywheel for the gravitational effect. Thus I try to feedback on a magnetic flywheel.
@scasired You can make a permanant magnet motor to work continuously. I built one. Permanant magnets are a source of energy. it is as simple as this... If you use one to hold a piece of paper on the refrigerator it is doing work therefore expending energy.
@esmannr Magnets holding pieces of paper to the refrigerator door are not doing any work. - No energy is expended. In a similar way, you can hold a pail of water for days without doing any work on it, unless of course you try to climb stairs with it. Energy/Work requires more than just a force. The force needs to be applied through some distance. If there is no change in position (relative to a field of force), no work is done.
@scasired Thats why i seek the combination of magnetism and gravity, two conservative forces might show interaction in the form of something like time energy.
@anandaadhar I don't know what 'time energy' is. Just like magnet wheels, gravity wheels don't work either (no offense to DaVinci). Just like the magnetic field of a permanent magnet, so the gravitational field of the Earth is a field of force. A field of force is not a source of energy. It is more like an energy bank. You can never withdraw more than you initially deposit (moving magnets close/far, moving weights up/down.) In real life, some of that energy is lost to friction or waste heat.
@scasired Nobody knows what time energy is until we have found the right formula for it as a combination of nature's basic forces in a dynamic mechanical setup that doesn't allow equilibrium. Microcosmic and macrocosmic perpetual motion is normal. Why not at the mesocosmic level of us on the planet?
@anandaadhar Consider that we have a flywheel that spins on a magnetic frictionless bearing and it is sealed in a vacuum. Theoretically, once set in motion, it would continue to spin forever (by virtue of its' rotational inertia). But one shouldn't expect to be able to withdraw energy forever, to perform useful work. Note that proposed flywheel powered vehicles need to be 'recharged' after the stored energy is depleted. 'Nobody knows what time energy is..'? Then it is not a useful concept.
@scasired Something we don't know yet is the source of hypothesis to be tested, as such it is indispensable and certainly not useless. Follow the scientific method.
@anandaadhar The term, 'time energy' doesn't make sense from a scientific perspective, unless of course we might be referring to a mathematical product of time and energy. Energy has the physical dimensions of mass times the square of length, all divided by the square of time. Clearly, time and energy are different physical concepts. In a similar way, 'time differences of space energy' is not clearly defined. Calling it 'quantum foam' is just as nebulous.
@scasired Of course, we are looking for something we as yet don't understand. That is the essence of research. There is speculation hypothesis and testing. That is the method. Reasoning from known fomulas as you do leads nowhere. Things are to be discovered. You want to know in front, and that is not possible. In front you have hypothesis. Experimentation confirms or denies the theory. That's it. And don't tell me you don't like the theory. No it is not established indeed.
@cchanderson It doesn't work like that. I try to involve gravity at the moment. So I rather attach the stator to a pendulum. Gives a stable oscillating input. As usual closing the loop constittes the problem.
Nature itself is perpetual motion. All we have to do is link up to it....this we call sustainable energy policies. But to sense and process time directly is indeed the proof we are after. Tesla drove the first electric car without batteries... was it free energy, could he convert radiant energy into kinetic energy with an electrical system? He proved it, but we didn't believe it. He was accused of black magic and his lab was burnt down and J.P. Morgan made sure that a second Tesla could not be.
@anandaadhar - nature is not perpetual motion as energy is not created out of nothing. Converting radiant energy into kinetic energy is not free energy, merely conversion.
Regardless of the tales surrounding Tesla no one has gotten free energy systems to work under any circumstances. The reason is simple. Reality says it can't happen.
I see the sun setting and rising out of its own, don't you? Thus it is perpetual motion. And yes, I never meant anything else but conversion of space energy talking about overunity. As soon as conversion happens, we speak of surplus energy or overunity. Read the article at my site on free energy history and all the people testifying about overunity systems and the problems they had with them. Often they found effects of overunity, but the control of them and thus commerce is always the problem.
@anandaadhar - the earth moves around the sun causing sun rise and sun sets. However it is not perpetual motion. As the frequency of sun sets relies on the speed of rotation of the earth they take longer each year as the earth slows down. Understand?
No one has found over-unity or how to control it. People currently sell over-unity in one form or another to the gullible public. They sell it but never deliver it.
@LiamXaoh Name me one heavenly object that is not spinning around the galactic centerof gravity, the black hole. Everything keeps spinning until dissolved in the black hole, period. There is a law of time unknown to mankind, and its about time indeed that we discover this law experimentaly.
@anandaadhar - I have no idea what point you're trying to make. I said the earth is slowing down spinning due to the moon. Your statement is on an entirely different matter it would seem.
@LiamXaoh This is about perpetual motion of the heavenly bodies not?Well whatever their dynamics, they do not stop spinning. Please read the other mails.
@anandaadhar - perpetual motion implies forever. Heavenly bodies such as planets with moons slow down. That is an astronomical fact. Spinning around the centre a galactic centre is irrelevant to the topic.
@LiamXaoh what you call irrelevant suits your argument, but to me it is the essential reality and proof of natural perpetual motion. As Herakleitos said pantha rhei, everything is in flux, and thus it is time that is the great cause of all things in eternal motion. All that we need is an experiment catching that dynamical force of time. That is it.
@anandaadhar - no. You are choosing to change the context to suit your argument. The fact is heavenly bodies do slow down. That was my point, that is what I meant. Time is not the great cause of all things in eternal motion. Kinetic energy and potential energy are the causes of all motion.
@LiamXaoh Well I simply do not agree with you as long as you say that time is not the original causa of manifestation. To say such a thing is utter foolishness in my opinion. It is typically human to consider time a product of ones own making. You are a standard time brain wash. I follow the times of the sun and moon. Nature settles the time and we have no say in that at all. And that stance defines our difference in consciousness and that is why my site is called theorderoftime. Just for that
@MediaMisDirected There is no such thing as failure in science: there is conjecture and refutation. Nothing wrong about that. And yes it won't harm you to check my practical and theoretical findings, even if I found no experimental proof of OU myself. How else to progress together but to learn from each other?
@zzytrewq Tesla never produced any free energy nor did he try to. Tesla tried to transmit energy without wires and when his investor found out it could not be metered, he pulled out his support.No prfit = no money. Tesla theorized that energy my be converted from charges in our atmosphere. He knew it was not possible,yet. There is no "FREE ENERGY"
@larryllix Free energy or not, this is a point of importance. A great insight is to realize that the banks (especially JP Morgan) are responsible for blocking the science of Tesla of wireless transmission of energy. That is why we are now messing with batteries for electrical cars that do not make their way therefore. Thus the banks are responsible not only for our present economical crisis because of their corruption of control over the flow of money, but also for the environmental crisis.
quite spreading disinformation larry........ we know there is free energy.....UFO does it ring a bell?? if you haven´t seen it on TV doesnt mean it doesn´t exist.
I understand the basic idea, but it has nothing to do with gravitons :)
The wheel locks because the numbers aren't right.
Iron magnets are weak. You ought to use Neodimium-rare earth magnets if you want any success. I suggest N35+! $8 a piece each 1/4" thick, and 1" in diameter.
scam alert scam alert--the free energy motor is based on the bedini sg circuit...the info is free(library/free encyclopedia)---so why get scammed out of your money?--free energy scams,are plastered all over the tube--under different themes --from solar to wind and this....as far as this fellow goes?I'd watch myself if i were you!..again buyer beware!
Are you speaking to me, or setting people up against me? I dont scam anybody and ask no money. I just share this belief in a OU machine. Don't be paranoid. Yes there is negative make belief (scammers), but I am of the positive side of make belief: just to be inspired and not fooled.
The main problem with such a motor is that any motor need energy and a magnetic field does not contain energy, only forces.
Some metal, or another magnet, within that force field could produce energy by moving along the force field but only until it touch one of the poles. Then you would need the same amount of energy (or more) to move it back to the original position.
Magnetism is a force not an energy. Two forces like magnetism and gravity e.g. combined with a timedifference may produce energy. Thus we try to find the formula in a mechanical sense for converting the vaccumenergy of space into kinetic energy. Magnets are just a part of the mechanism.
Force combined with time difference is not energy.
There is no "time" in energy. You may say that energy combined with time give power (Power * Time = Energy). Basic physics.
The formula to get energy from a force is simple and require only distance. Force * distance = energy.
To get energy out of a force field is not possible since there is no energy in a force field. Sorry but that´s the way it is. You can use the field to store potential energy in items in the field. That's all.
Well Faraday spins a forcefield next to a coil and has electrical energy from it....so energy from a forcefield given movement (covering distance indeed). Standard physics, yes.
There is no energy without time. Energy is a time function, and is therefore implicated in the concept. The idea that is new is that space is a form of energy that maybe can be converted with the help of force fields and distance and all of that, It is quantum physics and we are QM nerds. Nobody really knows how to, nor do you. Lets first admit to what we do not know and then fight our own ignorance with theory and experiment until we do know definitely. But as yet nobody does with certainty.
Simple logic says that without time there is no movement, without movement there is no energy or energy conversion as we try here from space energy to kinetic energy. Study Faraday, or sun particles, fotons on the move to power solar cells, or a dam to power hydro electric plant etc etc. Time is fundamental to each concept of energy, this is basic logic. If you can't find it in the physics textbook, that only means that those writers all need to follow a refresher course in philosophy and logic.
That is plainly wrong. You do not understand the concept of energy. Energy can be stored and used later. You seem to think that energy exist only when it is used (or, more correct, converted to other forms).
PS.
Funny how you accuse people of being arrogant when you say that all (all!) books on physics is wrong but you are right about this. That's true arrogance.
You think there is only one way to think about it. You talk about energy from matter, I talk about energy from space, the active expansion of it as the basis for all overunity. This is a quest. So join me or stay behind. Science has never been a one way street and never will. If something like this works we have redefined the concept of energy indeed. Why else would we be talking/discussing about it? To kiss your dogmatic lazy behind? i don't think so.
The concept of energy is very well defined in scientific terms and used in physics, chemistry, astronomy, engineering etc.
You obviously have your own definition, or idea, of something you call "energy" and that's great, but do not confuse it with the definition used in science.
And you must understand the difference between scientific theories, that do change, and definitions, that never change because they are just definitions used to describe phenomena and test the scientific theories.
Think. What you call science is the science you do. Apparently there is more than one option of science. They call it a paradigm, not just a theory. One paradagm harbours many theories. Ever heard of it? Paradigms change. Read Thomas Kuhn. Paradigms change definitons too. For instance what is the center of the universe? What is gravity and what is energy or an energy source? What is work? Your certainty of science is all false. In fact the uncerainty principle rules in this corner of science.
You apparently do not understand, or do not want to understand, what I try to tell you.
I suggest you dream on but do not confuse what you do with science. You have no idea what science is.
That does not make you a bad person but I have no wish to argue metaphysics with you (because it's boring compared to the real thing) so lets end this.
Let me know if you ever get a Free Energy Magnet Motor working. I promise to take you seriously then.
As I said , there is not one science. We have to respect each other's position of science to be different. In fact we are looking for new science perpectives when we experiment like me e.g. with this wheel. Without arrogance and calling each other ignorant there is closure in discussions, not otherwise. No respect is no peace. Your problem apparently. I cannot subscribe to your insults of being ignorant of course.
Standard physics also says that you can neither create nor destroy energy, but only convert energy and matter between each other. Your proposal violates the laws of physics.
Listen, quantum theory defends space as a form of energy called quantum foam. This all is abput catching that enegry and converting it. No laws are broken, just another paradigm. Heisenberg, the nobel prize winner believed in magnetmotors. So that's why I do this. Without this backing I certainly woudn't..
By moving the magnet in and out of the field, you are doing work on the wheel.
Work = force x distance
Simple kinematics explains that this is a scam. The distortions in spacetime you describe are too small to matter and the existence of quantum foam is doubtful because it violates special relativity. Please, stop debauching science with your crap and learn how physics actually works. Saying the words "quantum theory" doesn't automatically make you smart.
So relativism saying no can do is real sciene? That is doubted by many. Quantum theory is a well established approach Einstein indeed didn't like. Tesla himself didn't like Einstein's mathematical mysticism. But you adhere to it being lazy not doing anything yourself. Don't say that your preference is the absolute truth. No one will accept that. You believe in your inability to make it work, but I do not. So now we have an atheist builing a on a belief? Come on think man! It's so arrogant.
Then time would be energy divided by force x distance. Still a magnet motor might prove just this. There is e.g. x energy of time that is only diminished - divided - by magnetic force at a distance. My experience: no argument holds, but with a working example many arguments suddenly are present. Reason is just a servant of our experience then. Can it lead in any practical way? We keep theorizing. ...
@FredricF I'm not sure I'm following your reasoning, but, if something has potential energy, one just needs to find a way to harness the energy. Which I did.
@FredricF A combination of forcefields in action may deliver energy by conversion. Macrocosmic this can be observed, microcosmic too. Time differences of space energy - quantum foam - are the supposed causal drive. So now at the intermediate level. We are looking for the formula of time energy. What table top experiment proves the broken symmetry of the universe in manifestation?
Ive got a plan in mind that its hard to build... but my plan worth millions...some of you say impossible, others say possible if youre pro in physics... Im just not good in phyisics but I know how to make an unlimited 3-4V battery which does not need of human movement!
First... Im sure you won't be waiting till infinity... and If I got plans or mathematical proofs do you think im going to show them to a person who says "It is Impossible" think twice!
The reality is, that when it comes to energy, and what constitutes "physics", we haven't even begun to scratch the surface. So to claim an absolute as to what actually "defies" the laws of physics, is yet to be proven, or disproven.
I guess you are God, since you're able to magically create something from nothing.
Free Energy is just a lie put forth by people who have no understanding of basic physics. You cannot retrieve more energy from a system than you put in.
I know that idealistic, uneducated folks keep pushing this wishy-washy nonsense that the big evil corporations are just hiding free energy from the public, but that's just an idiotic conspiracy theory. Free Energy is an impossibility except at the quantum level.
What you say is a standard opinion of the sitting paradigm. When even Nobel prize winners like Werner Heisenberg (quantum mechanics) say that they think a magnet motor is possible, who are you to doubt that statement? Where is your Nobel Prize? see my Finsrud analysis watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q
Man, you fuckin cowardly little youtube snobs make me laugh, haha. You get some kind of pleasure from talking shit to everyone else becuz you are too much of a bitch to make your own vids. A lot easier to be a little bitch tho, I guess. Get a fuckin life and stop talkin shit to people and back up your claims. Criticizing people who try to achieve something just makes you look stupid, not the brave people who dare to think outside the box. Grow up or go back to sleep sheep.
Nice to defend the matter, but to use the right terms i demand. No pising contest please. Let the sceptics prove their lack in this, not th defenders. Okay?
fair enough. I am just sick of these ass holes. You know, Henry Ford's team of engineers told him a V8 engine was impossible for years, and then, what do you know, everyone is driving vehicles with V8's! There is no such thing as impossible, except in the feeble minds of fools like those who comment on youtube vids and say: "Thats Impossible!" Sorry man, I just get sick of these small minded idiots. Good vid, keep up the good work. the only way this wont work is if we give up.
theres a museum in i think detroit that is dedicated to engines that can get crazy miles per gallon that the oil companies bought and never produced and theres a bunch of other stuff along those lines hate to break it to you but ur an uneducated folk if you dont believe in big business is looking out for number one
The energy we want to put in is the space energy: the energy that is the result of the difference that time makes going outward and inward in the universe (centripetal vs centrifugal force). The gate we use to let this energy in is a magnet. The magnet separates these two forces with its polarity as a magnetic field. The right configuration of magnets moving on a rotor realtive to a stator should finally result in a selfrunner. Some claim to have done it. See Johnson, Hamel, Mylow. But knowhow?
TheNilvarg, you've effectively demonstrated that the corporations have done their job in making the general public dumb enough to doubt these things and only give you the limiting education that does not allow you to reach further, so they can invent and sell, sell, sell... to idiotic doubters like you. The Germans constructed a UFO decades ago using similar energies. The first prototype took 4 Mercedes Benz or Bmw engines but guess what. It worked! VRIL look it up.
It's only irrational to you because you have the herd mentality and believe that anything you've been told growing up is the ONLY thing and don't want to take the time to do the research. Besides the ONLY drugs I've ever done was weed about 3 times (not impressed) and I don't even take pharmaceutical medication unless I absolutely have to. That theory is shot. What's YOUR excuse? How about going and checking before you comment again and look like a fool.
Tesla is the father of free energy, he is the source of inspiration and consolation of all free energy researchers, thus also of me. Even though I'm not so into electricity as he is, I hold him high.
I wouldn't mind the lesson on magnets if the thing actually worked. I'm willing to bet a worthless US Dollar that those so-called 'magnets' are nothing more than semi-melted Kit Kat waffers.
You mean waffles i suppose...that stick like kit kat together... hmmm. According Nobel prize winner Heisenberg it could be so that magnets can do work, namely. But he also said: we science idiots can't do that, an outsider has to do this. And so it happened. Please see my latest video on Finsrud. watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q
relying on the postulated (ie possibly real, possibly not :P ) particle the GRAVITON ... the particle that transfers the force of gravity. So i ask you... since when was gravity effected by magnets?????? if gravitons are real, their behaviour is not gonna be effected by flipping a magnet upside down :/
Save me the bad words in the first place. With respect I want to talk. Natural science does as yet not really understand how electromagnetism and gravity cohere. It is all theory until one of our experiments confirm the h1 hypothesis and thus the underlyng theory. Gravitons are quantum theory. That theory needs to test what the supposed relation between magnetism and gravity is. E.g. frogs float in strongmagnetism. That is a relation. But control?Experiment is the only way. What do you suggest?
See watch?v=A1vyB-O5i6E to watch a frog float in a strong magnetic field. Also see an education video describing how magnetic levitation works in the cool technology of superconductors watch?v=m-Al7GAnH8Q&NR It is about magnetic flux trapping effect the meissner effect and such. Quantum theory takes it one step further with the question does magnetism dynamically relate to gravity? If yes, and a rotating magnetic earth does suggest that, can we harness that and thus prove by energy conversion?
Thanks so much i was having problems ...now you fix it and gave me a great x mas present ... who needs the wind if you can use magnetic energy and think of all the wiring you don't need and the pole .. wow .. to run your generator.
yep.... it's brilliant isn't it. except that wind energy works whereas this doesn't.... which is maybe why your electricity isn't generated by the magical magnetic energy making machine.....
See my research pages (follow link right above), there are many examples of harnessing space energy this or another way. I call it the fourth generation of free energy technology. To understand and control is another matter, but effects are found and even patented. The IEA speaks of three types of FE technology only. Keely and Tesla were the first to harness the fourth type though: space energy. Please first study and then comment.
I find that interesting, but I think space is probably closer to a very fine ether fluid, you ever wonder why water acts the way it does? Taking 'surface tension' out of the equation.
Paramahamsa Tewari says what you say and proves it in his overunity space energy generator. He followed the example of DePalma's N-machine, see watch?v=hcXLFDuAJNE
I persoally think gravity is the surface tension of the graviton sea of space.
'graviton sea of space' ... aha. do you even know anything about this theoretical graviton particle other than what your 'acclaimed physicists' (ie crackpot mad scientists or ppl trying to scam you) have 'taught' you?
It is not so outdated at all. Modern ether theories are there. Look up in the wikipedia under wiki/Aether_theories. Also google for Correa Aetheriometrics, and the Aether Physics Model by David Thomson and Tim Bourassa. Further are there on the practical side Harold Aspden and many other inventors with practicle notions of the ether as a source of energy. I myself adhere to a relative ether with a Hierarchical Particle Theory. See my free energy lecture videos and my free energy research pages.
It really doesn't matter what name you assign to this energy of space. Most important is to understand it is a time-related phenomenon. Space energy is a combination of the fundamental expansion and contraction of the universe, two concepts of time. A third one would be cyclic time. Thus we have three types of time and space or spacetime realms as you like: spacetime. universal space and local curved space. Three types of ether thus. That is my stance in this..
the operation of this device relies on a flow of gravitons? I'm not sure I understand...gravitons at this point in time are theoretical(not to say they don't exist, and there fore can't effect based on that assumption), and are also theorized to act in proportion to the agreed upon coefficient of gravity it's self, as being that of the weakest of the four forces. the explination of the operation of this device assumes too many unknowns to be plausible. unless I'm misunderstanding something big.
It is the theory to be tested, yes a graviton theory. It is one of the many. The original Maxwell provides twenty equations with twenty unknowns; complicated indeed. Heavyside simplified it, but the original version describes the interaction with forces acting from the putside, from space in our case.
it isn't free energy because you use the magnetic field of the magnets but it lasts about 400 years for a permanent magnet so if you align the magnets right the magnetic field will push the motor.
The ideais that stressing the fields leads to replenishing from the vacuum., extra on top of what the magnets do in restoring.Thus it would be free or extra energy.
Hi there. Very interesting indeed. Reminds me Mikell donut and spiral setup, but haven't seen no replication of this machine yet. Im experimenting on tri-gate portals and a variation of bedini-hamel portals with shielding. Check on me.
I lately stumbled upon the work of Gary: 19th century contemporary of Tesla, forgotten but a most interesting use of magnets and gravity. Needs replication too. One of th first reported self-runners on permanent magnets.
On the TV show "Myth Busters" they accidentally proved perpetual motion with magnets. The used the "Hamel" 3 cone design. each one inside of the other and magnets around the rim. The cones can never get settled, so the system never locks up. There never is an equlibrium of force, because as one come pushed away from the magnets on the barrel wall, it moves the cone below it. They were trying to bust the myth of the Hamel antigravity, but that device wasn't supposed to fly anyway.
yes, Hamel even wanted to build a flying saucer of his egyptian Jed-set-up. But that was too anbitious as far as i.a.c. Enough woud be to have a selfrunner with the hamel effect. That is enough proof of magnetic OU. The rest is then to engineers. But alas the psychology leads us away from the proof and into the ego of our ignorance.. If people copy Hamel it is a fact. Also if I succeed here, it is still a fact only when others can replicate it. Then we have the break-through we are looking for.
It is more systems that run dead in synergy and then need to take another turn. Human nature implies attachment to a certain mode or paradigm. The attachment is the feed of false ego, not one's seeking a way out of it.
This motor does not create free energy. The most basic law that all physics relys upon is that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Perpetual motion and "Free energy machines" do not, and will not exist.
Not with closed systems no. You are right, but do we have a closed system here? Magnets polarize the space around them. That is a dynamic effect. The energy of the universe is dynamic (see the planets run) and not static as also Tesla pointed out. And we have to catch that restless ether, do you understand?
I'm not sure that you understand. No machine that has been created, or ever will be created, can create energy. It is a physical impossibility, and nothing will ever change that.
Please see my Free Energy lectures where I explain the basic principles of the fourth generation sustainable energy technology of harnessing space energy. By the way Finsrud has a mechanical self runner, BeradensMEG proves overunity (By J, Naudin confirmed). And Bedini has a machine for years running on the same recharching battery. No there is ample proof, the question is here, can we confirm that catching of the space-energy with a mechanical setup like this?
Sorry I'm some what ignorant in this field. You said "energy cannot be created nor destroyed", so does that mean energy doesn't exist because it cannot be created? What about kinetic, potential, thermal, electromagnetic, chemical, nuclear, and mass energy. It takes energy to make energy perhaps? but that doesn't make since to me either because you would have to create energy to make energy and you said thats not possible. Im confused.
Basically, all of the energy that will ever be has been in the universe since the very begining of time. In order to know where that energy came from, one would have to know how the universe began, which no one knows for certain.
You have listed most of types an forms of energy above. Those types of energy can be transformed into other types of energy; for instance, a flash light turns electric energy into light energy.
I believe if no one knows where the energy came from then there is a chance it was created by some one or thing or it could have always just existed. This makes me believe that it might be possible for one to create energy because there is no proof that energy cannot be created other than no one has done or observed it yet. If energy does just exist and cannot be created then we are just harvesting it and when we use it it is released back into the universe.
In your next video, you hold a single magnet over the device, which then spins. You claim that a small amount of magnetic energy is being used to create an infinite amount of electric energy. You are, however, bobbing or "pumping" the magnet with your arm as you hold it above the device, which means that you are exerting a small amount of mechanical energy to create an equal amount of electrical energy. This process is called "energy transformation", and is certainly not a source of free energy.
That is correct: I give an impuls. The essence is that that impulse gives an overunity response. So you end up chasing your own impulse you see. The art of the engineering is to let that snake bite its own tail, to have the donkey run for the carrot with you sitting in the cart. It has been done, but nor replicable. Thats the problem.
You can impulse that machine as long as you want, but it will never make it a perpetual motion machine. Magnets are nothing but three dimensional springs; they cannot give any more power than exerted upon them. It doesn't matter how you place the magnets, nor how strong or big they are, they will never create energy.
Our understanding of physics and energy is based upon the principle that energy cannot be created or destroyed, and has been for hundreds of years. Some guy on YouTube is not going to prove that wrong.
It is not just some guys on ouTbe, this is an endeavor going on since Keely and Tesla! It is a paradigmatic conflict between the notion of open systems (energy converters) and closed systems (output less than input).
To be honest with you, it is mainly people on the internet and on YouTube who say it can be done. There are hundreds of designs out there, and hundreds to come, but none will work. Most people know not to waste their time with building a machine that they know from scratch will never work, but people with websites and YouTube accounts don't seem to be bothered by it.
You are afraid to be evil fighting evil. But the destruction of the world is due to ignorance. I do not fear to become ignorant, because that is what I fight all day. What do you do?
I have seen this Free Energy Magnet Motor with my own eyes. It works! Actually I have done it myself by holding the magnet in my hand above the wheel. The nicely built little motor spins smoothly on an old hard drive taken from an old pc. Use neodynium magnets, then the spiral wheel will work even better or turn faster. It gives me good hope that we will make progress if we work together to save the world from self-destruction by developing this new energy-system for the benefit of all!
240p we meet again...
INDESTRCUTABLE 5 months ago
That is not going to work. But good luck.
Peace The New and Improved generator
TheRealDealinlife 8 months ago
I'm not writing about overunity. A motor built from PM's only is not an overunity situation. The motor is built with the fuel as part of the apparatus. PM's contain magnetic energy that can be converted into other forms of energy/motion. Home generators use the magnetic energy of PM's, coils of copper and some electronics to make usable electric energy. I'm not going to go so far as to tell you how my motor works until my patent goes through, but my permanent magnet only motor works.
esmannr 1 year ago
@esmannr I wish you success! Tell me when you can show something.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
PM's can produce continuous motion, I have a design of my own that works without cams or lever arms. PM's have potential energy one just needs to discover how to harness it. They have a magnetic field just like an electromagnet. EM's are used in power generators for use in cities which produce megawatts of power. When one moves a PM through a coil of wire magnetic energy is converted to electric energy. It is a fact of physics that magnets 'permanent or electro' have energy.
esmannr 1 year ago
@esmannr when you move them, yes. But where does the overunity come from? That is the question that is as yet unresolved. The scientific formula is missing. So the engineers can't do anything until we have definitive proof og OU.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@esmannr - it is not a fact of physics that permanent magnets have energy. They only have a field that allows electric currents to be induced. Moving a magnet does not cause "magnetic energy" to be converted to electric energy. The kinetic energy applied to a magnet is transferred via its field to induce current in a coil.
LiamXaoh 1 year ago
Why do you have to wrap the a magnets with electric tape. When you do this it looks like you are faking your video. Can you make a video without the tape? Then I might believe what you are doing.
jimsanders1 1 year ago
@jimsanders1 it doesn't matter whether you believe me or not. I don't care. They are taped so that I don't have to glue the small kitchen kabinet magnets together. In later versions, i stick them to the plate underneath so that you can see them more clearly. Please look for my other video's.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
Shouldn't this video be called "Proposed free energy motor". I have been looking at all the supposed free energy videos and none delivers what the title suggests. There are a few obvious fakes. Let's ignore the laws of physics for a minute, can someone tell me how these magnetic motors are supposed to work. I know magnets don't have energy (that can be transferred to produce motion) so what is supposed to make these rotors spin? I am serious, I really need a clear explanation.
LiamXaoh 1 year ago
@LiamXaoh At present I am researching the combination of gravity and magnetism with this disc. There might be a natural interaction between the two that has been overlooked. In fact we are looking for a law of time energy combining the basic forces of the universe.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
My research proves that almost all overunity devices draw their extra energy from the potential energy of the local gravitational field. And to describe them in full scientific detail, it is required to revise the Maxwells equations of Electromagnetism to no-linear equations, and Einstein's theory of gravitation. So for the academic world to account for them it is required 1-3 nobels...
DrKCostas 1 year ago
No arrangement of permanent magnets by themselves can produce continuous motion, whether in a straight line, or in a circle. The magnetic field of force is a conservative field. The use of 'actuators' by way of lever arms or cam mechanisms doesn't work either. The motor never has enough torque to 'actuate' them. Permanent magnets are not a source of energy.
scasired 1 year ago 7
@scasired I know magnetic force is conservative. The idea is that different basic forces together may create energy from the necessary time difference between the two. The entire movement of the universe is based upon the restlessness of the basic natural forces. So magnetism combined with gravity like Finsrud seems to have developed might work..... and according to the equivalence principle one may also use a flywheel for the gravitational effect. Thus I try to feedback on a magnetic flywheel.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@scasired You can make a permanant magnet motor to work continuously. I built one. Permanant magnets are a source of energy. it is as simple as this... If you use one to hold a piece of paper on the refrigerator it is doing work therefore expending energy.
esmannr 1 year ago
@esmannr Doesn't move, not a motor.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@esmannr Magnets holding pieces of paper to the refrigerator door are not doing any work. - No energy is expended. In a similar way, you can hold a pail of water for days without doing any work on it, unless of course you try to climb stairs with it. Energy/Work requires more than just a force. The force needs to be applied through some distance. If there is no change in position (relative to a field of force), no work is done.
scasired 1 year ago
@scasired Thats why i seek the combination of magnetism and gravity, two conservative forces might show interaction in the form of something like time energy.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar I don't know what 'time energy' is. Just like magnet wheels, gravity wheels don't work either (no offense to DaVinci). Just like the magnetic field of a permanent magnet, so the gravitational field of the Earth is a field of force. A field of force is not a source of energy. It is more like an energy bank. You can never withdraw more than you initially deposit (moving magnets close/far, moving weights up/down.) In real life, some of that energy is lost to friction or waste heat.
scasired 1 year ago
@scasired Nobody knows what time energy is until we have found the right formula for it as a combination of nature's basic forces in a dynamic mechanical setup that doesn't allow equilibrium. Microcosmic and macrocosmic perpetual motion is normal. Why not at the mesocosmic level of us on the planet?
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar Consider that we have a flywheel that spins on a magnetic frictionless bearing and it is sealed in a vacuum. Theoretically, once set in motion, it would continue to spin forever (by virtue of its' rotational inertia). But one shouldn't expect to be able to withdraw energy forever, to perform useful work. Note that proposed flywheel powered vehicles need to be 'recharged' after the stored energy is depleted. 'Nobody knows what time energy is..'? Then it is not a useful concept.
scasired 1 year ago
@scasired Something we don't know yet is the source of hypothesis to be tested, as such it is indispensable and certainly not useless. Follow the scientific method.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar The term, 'time energy' doesn't make sense from a scientific perspective, unless of course we might be referring to a mathematical product of time and energy. Energy has the physical dimensions of mass times the square of length, all divided by the square of time. Clearly, time and energy are different physical concepts. In a similar way, 'time differences of space energy' is not clearly defined. Calling it 'quantum foam' is just as nebulous.
scasired 1 year ago
@scasired Of course, we are looking for something we as yet don't understand. That is the essence of research. There is speculation hypothesis and testing. That is the method. Reasoning from known fomulas as you do leads nowhere. Things are to be discovered. You want to know in front, and that is not possible. In front you have hypothesis. Experimentation confirms or denies the theory. That's it. And don't tell me you don't like the theory. No it is not established indeed.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar put the drive magnet on a rubber band...
cchanderson 9 months ago
@cchanderson It doesn't work like that. I try to involve gravity at the moment. So I rather attach the stator to a pendulum. Gives a stable oscillating input. As usual closing the loop constittes the problem.
anandaadhar 9 months ago
good work.thanks to all experimenters!
joecam905 1 year ago
Over-unity is impossible. Millions believe otherwise. Proof that millions are wrong.
zzytrewq 1 year ago
Nature itself is perpetual motion. All we have to do is link up to it....this we call sustainable energy policies. But to sense and process time directly is indeed the proof we are after. Tesla drove the first electric car without batteries... was it free energy, could he convert radiant energy into kinetic energy with an electrical system? He proved it, but we didn't believe it. He was accused of black magic and his lab was burnt down and J.P. Morgan made sure that a second Tesla could not be.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar - nature is not perpetual motion as energy is not created out of nothing. Converting radiant energy into kinetic energy is not free energy, merely conversion.
Regardless of the tales surrounding Tesla no one has gotten free energy systems to work under any circumstances. The reason is simple. Reality says it can't happen.
zzytrewq 1 year ago
I see the sun setting and rising out of its own, don't you? Thus it is perpetual motion. And yes, I never meant anything else but conversion of space energy talking about overunity. As soon as conversion happens, we speak of surplus energy or overunity. Read the article at my site on free energy history and all the people testifying about overunity systems and the problems they had with them. Often they found effects of overunity, but the control of them and thus commerce is always the problem.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar - the earth moves around the sun causing sun rise and sun sets. However it is not perpetual motion. As the frequency of sun sets relies on the speed of rotation of the earth they take longer each year as the earth slows down. Understand?
No one has found over-unity or how to control it. People currently sell over-unity in one form or another to the gullible public. They sell it but never deliver it.
zzytrewq 1 year ago
Are ypu really teaching me something about the workings of the solar system? It works! The planets do not stop spinning... Period.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar - the earth is slowing down (spinning) due to the effect of the moon. Any planet with a moon usually will do the same. Period.
LiamXaoh 1 year ago
@LiamXaoh Name me one heavenly object that is not spinning around the galactic centerof gravity, the black hole. Everything keeps spinning until dissolved in the black hole, period. There is a law of time unknown to mankind, and its about time indeed that we discover this law experimentaly.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar - I have no idea what point you're trying to make. I said the earth is slowing down spinning due to the moon. Your statement is on an entirely different matter it would seem.
LiamXaoh 1 year ago
@LiamXaoh This is about perpetual motion of the heavenly bodies not?Well whatever their dynamics, they do not stop spinning. Please read the other mails.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar - perpetual motion implies forever. Heavenly bodies such as planets with moons slow down. That is an astronomical fact. Spinning around the centre a galactic centre is irrelevant to the topic.
LiamXaoh 1 year ago
@LiamXaoh what you call irrelevant suits your argument, but to me it is the essential reality and proof of natural perpetual motion. As Herakleitos said pantha rhei, everything is in flux, and thus it is time that is the great cause of all things in eternal motion. All that we need is an experiment catching that dynamical force of time. That is it.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar - no. You are choosing to change the context to suit your argument. The fact is heavenly bodies do slow down. That was my point, that is what I meant. Time is not the great cause of all things in eternal motion. Kinetic energy and potential energy are the causes of all motion.
LiamXaoh 1 year ago
@LiamXaoh Well I simply do not agree with you as long as you say that time is not the original causa of manifestation. To say such a thing is utter foolishness in my opinion. It is typically human to consider time a product of ones own making. You are a standard time brain wash. I follow the times of the sun and moon. Nature settles the time and we have no say in that at all. And that stance defines our difference in consciousness and that is why my site is called theorderoftime. Just for that
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar you want us to go to YOUR website to verify YOUR findings? you = fail
MediaMisDirected 1 year ago
@MediaMisDirected There is no such thing as failure in science: there is conjecture and refutation. Nothing wrong about that. And yes it won't harm you to check my practical and theoretical findings, even if I found no experimental proof of OU myself. How else to progress together but to learn from each other?
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@zzytrewq Tesla never produced any free energy nor did he try to. Tesla tried to transmit energy without wires and when his investor found out it could not be metered, he pulled out his support.No prfit = no money. Tesla theorized that energy my be converted from charges in our atmosphere. He knew it was not possible,yet. There is no "FREE ENERGY"
larryllix 1 year ago
@larryllix Free energy or not, this is a point of importance. A great insight is to realize that the banks (especially JP Morgan) are responsible for blocking the science of Tesla of wireless transmission of energy. That is why we are now messing with batteries for electrical cars that do not make their way therefore. Thus the banks are responsible not only for our present economical crisis because of their corruption of control over the flow of money, but also for the environmental crisis.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@larryllix
quite spreading disinformation larry........ we know there is free energy.....UFO does it ring a bell?? if you haven´t seen it on TV doesnt mean it doesn´t exist.
LoQueIgnorascom 1 year ago
Comment removed
DieTheDeath 1 year ago
thats a cool idea i would like to see it run
100redeye 2 years ago
I understand the basic idea, but it has nothing to do with gravitons :)
The wheel locks because the numbers aren't right.
Iron magnets are weak. You ought to use Neodimium-rare earth magnets if you want any success. I suggest N35+! $8 a piece each 1/4" thick, and 1" in diameter.
Yetiman83 2 years ago
Dude,
Take a physics class, get your vocabulary right and then you will understand why this cannot work.
iamauen 2 years ago
You won't get the sobriety award!.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
talk , talk , talk .........bla bla bla let use see the wheel spin freely then.
jasonspinmaster 2 years ago
That is why I do not load anymore of my failed attempts. Happy?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
scam alert scam alert--the free energy motor is based on the bedini sg circuit...the info is free(library/free encyclopedia)---so why get scammed out of your money?--free energy scams,are plastered all over the tube--under different themes --from solar to wind and this....as far as this fellow goes?I'd watch myself if i were you!..again buyer beware!
frogmanvc 2 years ago
Are you speaking to me, or setting people up against me? I dont scam anybody and ask no money. I just share this belief in a OU machine. Don't be paranoid. Yes there is negative make belief (scammers), but I am of the positive side of make belief: just to be inspired and not fooled.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Show us the movement. Show us a working motor. Please!
(do not expect a video anytime soon)
FredricF 2 years ago
I share your feelings
anandaadhar 2 years ago
The main problem with such a motor is that any motor need energy and a magnetic field does not contain energy, only forces.
Some metal, or another magnet, within that force field could produce energy by moving along the force field but only until it touch one of the poles. Then you would need the same amount of energy (or more) to move it back to the original position.
FredricF 2 years ago 2
Magnetism is a force not an energy. Two forces like magnetism and gravity e.g. combined with a timedifference may produce energy. Thus we try to find the formula in a mechanical sense for converting the vaccumenergy of space into kinetic energy. Magnets are just a part of the mechanism.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Force combined with time difference is not energy.
There is no "time" in energy. You may say that energy combined with time give power (Power * Time = Energy). Basic physics.
The formula to get energy from a force is simple and require only distance. Force * distance = energy.
To get energy out of a force field is not possible since there is no energy in a force field. Sorry but that´s the way it is. You can use the field to store potential energy in items in the field. That's all.
FredricF 2 years ago 4
Well Faraday spins a forcefield next to a coil and has electrical energy from it....so energy from a forcefield given movement (covering distance indeed). Standard physics, yes.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
There is no energy without time. Energy is a time function, and is therefore implicated in the concept. The idea that is new is that space is a form of energy that maybe can be converted with the help of force fields and distance and all of that, It is quantum physics and we are QM nerds. Nobody really knows how to, nor do you. Lets first admit to what we do not know and then fight our own ignorance with theory and experiment until we do know definitely. But as yet nobody does with certainty.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
"There is no energy without time."
Please show me a reference to a book about physics where this statement can be validated.
The concept of energy is no mystery in physics, it's very well defined. Even in quantum mechanics.
The word "energy" on some mystical New Age context is not but that kind of energy does not power engines.
FredricF 2 years ago
Simple logic says that without time there is no movement, without movement there is no energy or energy conversion as we try here from space energy to kinetic energy. Study Faraday, or sun particles, fotons on the move to power solar cells, or a dam to power hydro electric plant etc etc. Time is fundamental to each concept of energy, this is basic logic. If you can't find it in the physics textbook, that only means that those writers all need to follow a refresher course in philosophy and logic.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
"without movement there is no energy".
That is plainly wrong. You do not understand the concept of energy. Energy can be stored and used later. You seem to think that energy exist only when it is used (or, more correct, converted to other forms).
PS.
Funny how you accuse people of being arrogant when you say that all (all!) books on physics is wrong but you are right about this. That's true arrogance.
FredricF 2 years ago
You think there is only one way to think about it. You talk about energy from matter, I talk about energy from space, the active expansion of it as the basis for all overunity. This is a quest. So join me or stay behind. Science has never been a one way street and never will. If something like this works we have redefined the concept of energy indeed. Why else would we be talking/discussing about it? To kiss your dogmatic lazy behind? i don't think so.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
The concept of energy is very well defined in scientific terms and used in physics, chemistry, astronomy, engineering etc.
You obviously have your own definition, or idea, of something you call "energy" and that's great, but do not confuse it with the definition used in science.
And you must understand the difference between scientific theories, that do change, and definitions, that never change because they are just definitions used to describe phenomena and test the scientific theories.
FredricF 2 years ago
Think. What you call science is the science you do. Apparently there is more than one option of science. They call it a paradigm, not just a theory. One paradagm harbours many theories. Ever heard of it? Paradigms change. Read Thomas Kuhn. Paradigms change definitons too. For instance what is the center of the universe? What is gravity and what is energy or an energy source? What is work? Your certainty of science is all false. In fact the uncerainty principle rules in this corner of science.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
You apparently do not understand, or do not want to understand, what I try to tell you.
I suggest you dream on but do not confuse what you do with science. You have no idea what science is.
That does not make you a bad person but I have no wish to argue metaphysics with you (because it's boring compared to the real thing) so lets end this.
Let me know if you ever get a Free Energy Magnet Motor working. I promise to take you seriously then.
Peace brother.
FredricF 2 years ago
As I said , there is not one science. We have to respect each other's position of science to be different. In fact we are looking for new science perpectives when we experiment like me e.g. with this wheel. Without arrogance and calling each other ignorant there is closure in discussions, not otherwise. No respect is no peace. Your problem apparently. I cannot subscribe to your insults of being ignorant of course.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Standard physics also says that you can neither create nor destroy energy, but only convert energy and matter between each other. Your proposal violates the laws of physics.
AtheistFromHell2 2 years ago
Listen, quantum theory defends space as a form of energy called quantum foam. This all is abput catching that enegry and converting it. No laws are broken, just another paradigm. Heisenberg, the nobel prize winner believed in magnetmotors. So that's why I do this. Without this backing I certainly woudn't..
anandaadhar 2 years ago
By moving the magnet in and out of the field, you are doing work on the wheel.
Work = force x distance
Simple kinematics explains that this is a scam. The distortions in spacetime you describe are too small to matter and the existence of quantum foam is doubtful because it violates special relativity. Please, stop debauching science with your crap and learn how physics actually works. Saying the words "quantum theory" doesn't automatically make you smart.
AtheistFromHell2 2 years ago
So relativism saying no can do is real sciene? That is doubted by many. Quantum theory is a well established approach Einstein indeed didn't like. Tesla himself didn't like Einstein's mathematical mysticism. But you adhere to it being lazy not doing anything yourself. Don't say that your preference is the absolute truth. No one will accept that. You believe in your inability to make it work, but I do not. So now we have an atheist builing a on a belief? Come on think man! It's so arrogant.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
To all respondents, I will delete all posts that are insulting using the wrong words. First deserve it to be addressed behaving respectfully.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
@FredricF Almost perfect.
.
Energy = force x distance x time
Power = force x distance
There is "time" in energy. Energy is power for a length of time...thus Watthours = Watts (power) x hours (time)
larryllix 1 year ago
@larryllix
Then time would be energy divided by force x distance. Still a magnet motor might prove just this. There is e.g. x energy of time that is only diminished - divided - by magnetic force at a distance. My experience: no argument holds, but with a working example many arguments suddenly are present. Reason is just a servant of our experience then. Can it lead in any practical way? We keep theorizing. ...
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@anandaadhar Most sounds reasonable. Some of your response is not understood.
larryllix 1 year ago
@FredricF I'm not sure I'm following your reasoning, but, if something has potential energy, one just needs to find a way to harness the energy. Which I did.
esmannr 1 year ago
@FredricF Still nature is all force fields on the move by time.
anandaadhar 1 year ago
@FredricF A combination of forcefields in action may deliver energy by conversion. Macrocosmic this can be observed, microcosmic too. Time differences of space energy - quantum foam - are the supposed causal drive. So now at the intermediate level. We are looking for the formula of time energy. What table top experiment proves the broken symmetry of the universe in manifestation?
anandaadhar 1 year ago
who doesn't have a walmart nearby? you have to live in the arctic to not have a walmart
Jay12341235 2 years ago
Yeah, all the world iives in the USA??
anandaadhar 2 years ago
lol. sorry. i really like your invention. very good work thanks for the vid
Jay12341235 2 years ago
I built my own magnetic generator that currently provides free electricity to all my kitchen appliances using the plans found at:
magniwork-review.blogspot(DOT)com
abmod06 2 years ago
Comment removed
voidows 2 years ago
I've been using a Magnetic Generator to power my kitchen appliances using the plans at:
magniwork-review.blogspot(DOT)com
jtopicz1 2 years ago
Ive got a plan in mind that its hard to build... but my plan worth millions...some of you say impossible, others say possible if youre pro in physics... Im just not good in phyisics but I know how to make an unlimited 3-4V battery which does not need of human movement!
MyDarknezz 2 years ago
haha youre either insane or extremely ignorant
axe863 2 years ago
Haha Insane? If You're really sure just wait... You'll see friend!!!
MyDarknezz 2 years ago
ok I'll be waiting til infinity. Before you do anything, you need a mathematical proofs. Let me see them.
axe863 2 years ago
First... Im sure you won't be waiting till infinity... and If I got plans or mathematical proofs do you think im going to show them to a person who says "It is Impossible" think twice!
MyDarknezz 2 years ago
lol no you dont have to show me the device ... I meant the theoretical "field" that you will tap. Is it an multidimensional dynamic??? lol
The real reason I asked "If I got plans or mathematical proofs " So you have nothing lol
axe863 2 years ago
Look thru all of U tube not one of these works FRAUD HOAX HIAX
therealtruthtold 2 years ago
Okay wrong words. I'm honest here and don't claim overunity. I'm just looking for it. Don't you?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
The reality is, that when it comes to energy, and what constitutes "physics", we haven't even begun to scratch the surface. So to claim an absolute as to what actually "defies" the laws of physics, is yet to be proven, or disproven.
johnnowa1953 2 years ago
That is correct, that is why we experiment like this until it is science and proper physics with formula's etc. indeed.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
I guess you are God, since you're able to magically create something from nothing.
Free Energy is just a lie put forth by people who have no understanding of basic physics. You cannot retrieve more energy from a system than you put in.
I know that idealistic, uneducated folks keep pushing this wishy-washy nonsense that the big evil corporations are just hiding free energy from the public, but that's just an idiotic conspiracy theory. Free Energy is an impossibility except at the quantum level.
TheNilvarg 2 years ago
What you say is a standard opinion of the sitting paradigm. When even Nobel prize winners like Werner Heisenberg (quantum mechanics) say that they think a magnet motor is possible, who are you to doubt that statement? Where is your Nobel Prize? see my Finsrud analysis watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Man, you fuckin cowardly little youtube snobs make me laugh, haha. You get some kind of pleasure from talking shit to everyone else becuz you are too much of a bitch to make your own vids. A lot easier to be a little bitch tho, I guess. Get a fuckin life and stop talkin shit to people and back up your claims. Criticizing people who try to achieve something just makes you look stupid, not the brave people who dare to think outside the box. Grow up or go back to sleep sheep.
FavoriteBrew 2 years ago
Nice to defend the matter, but to use the right terms i demand. No pising contest please. Let the sceptics prove their lack in this, not th defenders. Okay?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
fair enough. I am just sick of these ass holes. You know, Henry Ford's team of engineers told him a V8 engine was impossible for years, and then, what do you know, everyone is driving vehicles with V8's! There is no such thing as impossible, except in the feeble minds of fools like those who comment on youtube vids and say: "Thats Impossible!" Sorry man, I just get sick of these small minded idiots. Good vid, keep up the good work. the only way this wont work is if we give up.
FavoriteBrew 2 years ago
theres a museum in i think detroit that is dedicated to engines that can get crazy miles per gallon that the oil companies bought and never produced and theres a bunch of other stuff along those lines hate to break it to you but ur an uneducated folk if you dont believe in big business is looking out for number one
BenSTA09 2 years ago
Right, "You cannot retrieve more energy from a system than you put in.".
BUT, how do you define energy you put in?
Its like saying Solar Energy is impossible in a sightless civilization that has never had recognition of light and photons.
kmlau1986 2 years ago
The energy we want to put in is the space energy: the energy that is the result of the difference that time makes going outward and inward in the universe (centripetal vs centrifugal force). The gate we use to let this energy in is a magnet. The magnet separates these two forces with its polarity as a magnetic field. The right configuration of magnets moving on a rotor realtive to a stator should finally result in a selfrunner. Some claim to have done it. See Johnson, Hamel, Mylow. But knowhow?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
TheNilvarg, you've effectively demonstrated that the corporations have done their job in making the general public dumb enough to doubt these things and only give you the limiting education that does not allow you to reach further, so they can invent and sell, sell, sell... to idiotic doubters like you. The Germans constructed a UFO decades ago using similar energies. The first prototype took 4 Mercedes Benz or Bmw engines but guess what. It worked! VRIL look it up.
pfotojenik 2 years ago
You've effectively demonstrated that if you fry your brain with enough mind-crippling drugs, you'll believe any delusion, no matter how irrational.
TheNilvarg 2 years ago
It's only irrational to you because you have the herd mentality and believe that anything you've been told growing up is the ONLY thing and don't want to take the time to do the research. Besides the ONLY drugs I've ever done was weed about 3 times (not impressed) and I don't even take pharmaceutical medication unless I absolutely have to. That theory is shot. What's YOUR excuse? How about going and checking before you comment again and look like a fool.
pfotojenik 2 years ago
gud comment,guess these narrow minded sheeple cant think past wot they hear on the news and they probly still cant believe the earth iz round..
Jimpac857 2 years ago
Nikola tesla is my hero... did he help with this?
jellofast 2 years ago
Tesla is the father of free energy, he is the source of inspiration and consolation of all free energy researchers, thus also of me. Even though I'm not so into electricity as he is, I hold him high.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
I wouldn't mind the lesson on magnets if the thing actually worked. I'm willing to bet a worthless US Dollar that those so-called 'magnets' are nothing more than semi-melted Kit Kat waffers.
ToneyRuken 2 years ago
You mean waffles i suppose...that stick like kit kat together... hmmm. According Nobel prize winner Heisenberg it could be so that magnets can do work, namely. But he also said: we science idiots can't do that, an outsider has to do this. And so it happened. Please see my latest video on Finsrud. watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q
anandaadhar 2 years ago
I'm probably assuming that Bob the elder also doesn't realize that sub atomic particles aren't the smallest particle around either as well.
Krawnikal 2 years ago
rofl how moronic.
relying on the postulated (ie possibly real, possibly not :P ) particle the GRAVITON ... the particle that transfers the force of gravity. So i ask you... since when was gravity effected by magnets?????? if gravitons are real, their behaviour is not gonna be effected by flipping a magnet upside down :/
BobTheElder 2 years ago
Save me the bad words in the first place. With respect I want to talk. Natural science does as yet not really understand how electromagnetism and gravity cohere. It is all theory until one of our experiments confirm the h1 hypothesis and thus the underlyng theory. Gravitons are quantum theory. That theory needs to test what the supposed relation between magnetism and gravity is. E.g. frogs float in strongmagnetism. That is a relation. But control?Experiment is the only way. What do you suggest?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
See watch?v=A1vyB-O5i6E to watch a frog float in a strong magnetic field. Also see an education video describing how magnetic levitation works in the cool technology of superconductors watch?v=m-Al7GAnH8Q&NR It is about magnetic flux trapping effect the meissner effect and such. Quantum theory takes it one step further with the question does magnetism dynamically relate to gravity? If yes, and a rotating magnetic earth does suggest that, can we harness that and thus prove by energy conversion?
anandaadhar 2 years ago
Thanks so much i was having problems ...now you fix it and gave me a great x mas present ... who needs the wind if you can use magnetic energy and think of all the wiring you don't need and the pole .. wow .. to run your generator.
tomsanut 3 years ago
I'm really happy with it if I manage to turn it into a self-runner. Thanks for the adherence.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
yep.... it's brilliant isn't it. except that wind energy works whereas this doesn't.... which is maybe why your electricity isn't generated by the magical magnetic energy making machine.....
BobTheElder 2 years ago
See my research pages (follow link right above), there are many examples of harnessing space energy this or another way. I call it the fourth generation of free energy technology. To understand and control is another matter, but effects are found and even patented. The IEA speaks of three types of FE technology only. Keely and Tesla were the first to harness the fourth type though: space energy. Please first study and then comment.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
If youre watching this, you can skip to 5:30.
2. I think the Earth magnethic poles would already push those gravitons(if theyre true) away before the even reach your device.
TheMacrohardCorp 3 years ago
If gravitons are the stuff space consists of, it is even in you.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
I find that interesting, but I think space is probably closer to a very fine ether fluid, you ever wonder why water acts the way it does? Taking 'surface tension' out of the equation.
Krawnikal 2 years ago
Paramahamsa Tewari says what you say and proves it in his overunity space energy generator. He followed the example of DePalma's N-machine, see watch?v=hcXLFDuAJNE
I persoally think gravity is the surface tension of the graviton sea of space.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
'graviton sea of space' ... aha. do you even know anything about this theoretical graviton particle other than what your 'acclaimed physicists' (ie crackpot mad scientists or ppl trying to scam you) have 'taught' you?
BobTheElder 2 years ago
'ether' = what scientists later came to know was 4D spacetime :/ ether = old old false concept :/ why... are you using a different meaning?
BobTheElder 2 years ago
No I meant Ether space as in Maxwell's understanding of it, I think we'll return to that understanding of it soon.
Krawnikal 2 years ago
It is not so outdated at all. Modern ether theories are there. Look up in the wikipedia under wiki/Aether_theories. Also google for Correa Aetheriometrics, and the Aether Physics Model by David Thomson and Tim Bourassa. Further are there on the practical side Harold Aspden and many other inventors with practicle notions of the ether as a source of energy. I myself adhere to a relative ether with a Hierarchical Particle Theory. See my free energy lecture videos and my free energy research pages.
anandaadhar 2 years ago
It really doesn't matter what name you assign to this energy of space. Most important is to understand it is a time-related phenomenon. Space energy is a combination of the fundamental expansion and contraction of the universe, two concepts of time. A third one would be cyclic time. Thus we have three types of time and space or spacetime realms as you like: spacetime. universal space and local curved space. Three types of ether thus. That is my stance in this..
anandaadhar 2 years ago
very well done,espescially for a layman like me,it was well explained and fascinating,thanks for posying this.
grenda5 3 years ago
Pleased to please you.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
the operation of this device relies on a flow of gravitons? I'm not sure I understand...gravitons at this point in time are theoretical(not to say they don't exist, and there fore can't effect based on that assumption), and are also theorized to act in proportion to the agreed upon coefficient of gravity it's self, as being that of the weakest of the four forces. the explination of the operation of this device assumes too many unknowns to be plausible. unless I'm misunderstanding something big.
Eviscera09 3 years ago
It is the theory to be tested, yes a graviton theory. It is one of the many. The original Maxwell provides twenty equations with twenty unknowns; complicated indeed. Heavyside simplified it, but the original version describes the interaction with forces acting from the putside, from space in our case.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
WARNING the web site generates a virus infection alarm. Access with caution.
rickharriss 3 years ago
You mean my website, theorderoftime? There are some java-programs, but with virusses it has nothing to do...
anandaadhar 3 years ago
it isn't free energy because you use the magnetic field of the magnets but it lasts about 400 years for a permanent magnet so if you align the magnets right the magnetic field will push the motor.
brettnnn 3 years ago
The ideais that stressing the fields leads to replenishing from the vacuum., extra on top of what the magnets do in restoring.Thus it would be free or extra energy.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Hi there. Very interesting indeed. Reminds me Mikell donut and spiral setup, but haven't seen no replication of this machine yet. Im experimenting on tri-gate portals and a variation of bedini-hamel portals with shielding. Check on me.
Blueskyh2o 3 years ago
I lately stumbled upon the work of Gary: 19th century contemporary of Tesla, forgotten but a most interesting use of magnets and gravity. Needs replication too. One of th first reported self-runners on permanent magnets.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
On the TV show "Myth Busters" they accidentally proved perpetual motion with magnets. The used the "Hamel" 3 cone design. each one inside of the other and magnets around the rim. The cones can never get settled, so the system never locks up. There never is an equlibrium of force, because as one come pushed away from the magnets on the barrel wall, it moves the cone below it. They were trying to bust the myth of the Hamel antigravity, but that device wasn't supposed to fly anyway.
AlchemistShaman 3 years ago
Very interesting, is there a video? I haven't seen it.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
yes, Hamel even wanted to build a flying saucer of his egyptian Jed-set-up. But that was too anbitious as far as i.a.c. Enough woud be to have a selfrunner with the hamel effect. That is enough proof of magnetic OU. The rest is then to engineers. But alas the psychology leads us away from the proof and into the ego of our ignorance.. If people copy Hamel it is a fact. Also if I succeed here, it is still a fact only when others can replicate it. Then we have the break-through we are looking for.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Human nature,"If you say it can't be done I will prove you wrong".
riverrat222 4 years ago
It is more systems that run dead in synergy and then need to take another turn. Human nature implies attachment to a certain mode or paradigm. The attachment is the feed of false ego, not one's seeking a way out of it.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
Perfect comment dude!
Godarth 4 years ago
Hmm. I see you deleted my previous comment.
This motor does not create free energy. The most basic law that all physics relys upon is that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Perpetual motion and "Free energy machines" do not, and will not exist.
Bayanetto 4 years ago
Not with closed systems no. You are right, but do we have a closed system here? Magnets polarize the space around them. That is a dynamic effect. The energy of the universe is dynamic (see the planets run) and not static as also Tesla pointed out. And we have to catch that restless ether, do you understand?
anandaadhar 4 years ago
I'm not sure that you understand. No machine that has been created, or ever will be created, can create energy. It is a physical impossibility, and nothing will ever change that.
Bayanetto 4 years ago
Please see my Free Energy lectures where I explain the basic principles of the fourth generation sustainable energy technology of harnessing space energy. By the way Finsrud has a mechanical self runner, BeradensMEG proves overunity (By J, Naudin confirmed). And Bedini has a machine for years running on the same recharching battery. No there is ample proof, the question is here, can we confirm that catching of the space-energy with a mechanical setup like this?
anandaadhar 3 years ago
BeradensMEG= Bearden's MEG
anandaadhar 3 years ago
Sorry I'm some what ignorant in this field. You said "energy cannot be created nor destroyed", so does that mean energy doesn't exist because it cannot be created? What about kinetic, potential, thermal, electromagnetic, chemical, nuclear, and mass energy. It takes energy to make energy perhaps? but that doesn't make since to me either because you would have to create energy to make energy and you said thats not possible. Im confused.
riverrat222 4 years ago
Basically, all of the energy that will ever be has been in the universe since the very begining of time. In order to know where that energy came from, one would have to know how the universe began, which no one knows for certain.
You have listed most of types an forms of energy above. Those types of energy can be transformed into other types of energy; for instance, a flash light turns electric energy into light energy.
Bayanetto 4 years ago
I believe if no one knows where the energy came from then there is a chance it was created by some one or thing or it could have always just existed. This makes me believe that it might be possible for one to create energy because there is no proof that energy cannot be created other than no one has done or observed it yet. If energy does just exist and cannot be created then we are just harvesting it and when we use it it is released back into the universe.
riverrat222 4 years ago
The latter is our axiom here.
anandaadhar 3 years ago
In your next video, you hold a single magnet over the device, which then spins. You claim that a small amount of magnetic energy is being used to create an infinite amount of electric energy. You are, however, bobbing or "pumping" the magnet with your arm as you hold it above the device, which means that you are exerting a small amount of mechanical energy to create an equal amount of electrical energy. This process is called "energy transformation", and is certainly not a source of free energy.
Bayanetto 4 years ago
That is correct: I give an impuls. The essence is that that impulse gives an overunity response. So you end up chasing your own impulse you see. The art of the engineering is to let that snake bite its own tail, to have the donkey run for the carrot with you sitting in the cart. It has been done, but nor replicable. Thats the problem.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
You can impulse that machine as long as you want, but it will never make it a perpetual motion machine. Magnets are nothing but three dimensional springs; they cannot give any more power than exerted upon them. It doesn't matter how you place the magnets, nor how strong or big they are, they will never create energy.
Bayanetto 4 years ago 3
Our understanding of physics and energy is based upon the principle that energy cannot be created or destroyed, and has been for hundreds of years. Some guy on YouTube is not going to prove that wrong.
Bayanetto 4 years ago 2
It is not just some guys on ouTbe, this is an endeavor going on since Keely and Tesla! It is a paradigmatic conflict between the notion of open systems (energy converters) and closed systems (output less than input).
anandaadhar 4 years ago
To be honest with you, it is mainly people on the internet and on YouTube who say it can be done. There are hundreds of designs out there, and hundreds to come, but none will work. Most people know not to waste their time with building a machine that they know from scratch will never work, but people with websites and YouTube accounts don't seem to be bothered by it.
Bayanetto 4 years ago 3
excuse me, i missed part II lol
iamyourgranny 4 years ago
aknowledged
anandaadhar 3 years ago
excellent stuff thanks for sharing
DIMPLEKEY 4 years ago
It didnt do a whole lot,did it?
pidner 4 years ago
In the beginning there was darkness, but full creation was there after seven days. I take a little longer if you permit.
anandaadhar 4 years ago
Point well taken.
pidner 4 years ago
sakhya....did you ever think that what you set out to do (save the world from the destruction), will make you create what you try to avoid?
does 'free energy' not sound slightly dangerous? think.
tiberianfallout 4 years ago
You are afraid to be evil fighting evil. But the destruction of the world is due to ignorance. I do not fear to become ignorant, because that is what I fight all day. What do you do?
123sakhya 4 years ago
will it drive me to work every day???
spikeyboyo 4 years ago
I hope so
anandaadhar 4 years ago
This is soo awsome Mr. Keep up your work!
I admire ppl like you who come up w/ stuff like this
Alas777 4 years ago
I have seen this Free Energy Magnet Motor with my own eyes. It works! Actually I have done it myself by holding the magnet in my hand above the wheel. The nicely built little motor spins smoothly on an old hard drive taken from an old pc. Use neodynium magnets, then the spiral wheel will work even better or turn faster. It gives me good hope that we will make progress if we work together to save the world from self-destruction by developing this new energy-system for the benefit of all!
123sakhya 4 years ago