Added: 2 years ago
From: ClimateScam
Views: 3,325
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I don't want to knock Prof B. But Bellamy's Garden made him a role model for the young. Now he has abused that privelege. So I invite him to step off our television screens now. Sad.

  • @bobinhk1

    i am sure he will listen to you madam he will eventually see that all opposing views have to be crushed beneath the boots of the ecofuhrer.

  • Oh, you clueless old fool. Stop embarrassing yourself.

  • too late

    

  • A man was once asked: Do you believe in 'climate change'? He responded: 'Money, Power, Control, Status - TICK WHICHEVER!

  • 2010 was the warmest year on record, massive droughts in the Amazon and Africa, Epic wild fires in Russia....yeah this guy is right

  • David Bellamy is understandably confused, Global Warming is just code for Global overpopulation

    and Climate Change is code for Political Climate Change. those are the real issues at stake. not the air Temperature.

  • What I can't believe is that in 2010, in a scientific and technological society, this 'climate change' codswallop has actually been swallowed by the great unwashed - it's like the flat earth debate all over again, but in a age of science and advancement such as this, it's just unbelievable. We may as well hold a debate about the existence of Moonwhales! What really gets my back up is the politicians (and other hangers on) with the 'serious' look on their fat faces peddling this garbage.

  • @klassklassklass Yes it is unbelievable really.....I couldn't really understand your poorly worded comment, but I take it you don't agree with Bellamy.....right?

  • You are scientifically illiterate

  • There is no doubt that pollution from cars and the stuff spewing from smoke stacks is not something that is beneficial to our health. If you are not in the business of making money regardless of putting everyone and every living thing on the planet at risk the chemical haze we live in isn't doing any of us any good. A fluctuation in temperature we can deal with. A poisoned atmosphere we can not.

  • Good to hear! except for the trillions of $ part- I love skiing! But seriously, what's wrong with warm weather anyway?

  • I remember at least 10 years ago hearing this man say that we were due to get a much colder world.

  • There have been changes in temperature since time began, here are some facts

    Global Warming is in fact really MULTI-DECADAL OSCILLATIONS.

    1915--1940 WAS A WARM PERIOD

    1940--1978 WAS A COLD PRIOD

    1978-- 1999 A WARM PRIOD

    1999-- 2030 A COLD PERIOD

    So it will get colder

  • There Has Been Gobal cooling since 1999 which the global warming activists will not accept but

    this is fromthe Us National Snow & Ice Data Centre in Colorado, the Artic Summer Ice has increased by 409,000 square miles or 26% since 2007, even committed Global Warming Activists do not dispute this.

  • @rono204 er....global warming 'activists' do accept the fact the Earth has been cooling since 1998*, but it's a mere drop in the ocean compared to how much the Earth has heated up since the 20th century.

  • @bindoggus Yes all cause by solar cycles.

  • bfpccbm and honestann: I agree with both of you. I would add that since the release of the Climategate emails, there is no doubt that this is a fascist plan by our governments to tax and control us.

    The only Warmists left now are the hardcore religious Green zealots who do not care for truth. The fraud is out in the open but the fascists are carrying on regardless. What can we do to fight them? Will it take blood? I pray not.

  • Ummm... Fascists, Hitler was one of those, and he was a conspiracy theorist.

    The vast majority of scientists support the anthropological global warming hypothesis.

    Why treat the atmosphere like an experiment that we can't stop? Seems very foolish.

  • It's all about global government and total control by the elete.........

  • 1: higher temperatures cause CO2 increase, not the opposite.

    2: temps have fallen the past 10 years while CO2 continues to rise.

    3: periods of much warmer/cooler weather (and higher/lower CO2) have existed over 20,000+ years.

    4: planets warm/cool together, which means warming/cooling is primarily caused by the sun.

    We need 100% separation of science and state.

    Government funded science == propaganda.

    Plants absorb CO2 and emit O2.

    Hang climate totalitarians.

    End lies & pollution.

  • how does higher temperature cause CO2 increase, not the opposite?

  • @honestann I don't know why I keep returning to videos like this just to view the comments. Reading comments like yours and seeing how many people like it just makes me depressed at how many idiots are out there....

  • @honestann

    1: Heat causes water to boil in pan. But it gets awfully steamy if u don't open window.

    2: The last decade warmest on record. See NASA.

    3: Wrong. Amend to 4.5 billion years. But in which 'quiet' period did Standard Oil start digging holes.

    4: Of course they do, like any objects placed in proximity of a heat source. DUH!

    We need 100% separation of oil lobbyists & congressman.

    Oil funded science = lies.

    Vegetables absorb lies and emit B/S.

    Hang idiots.

  • @TheElasticJesusRez:

    #1: The sky is WIDE OPEN. Furthermore, except for the top few miles of hardened crust, the earth is a BALL OF MAGMA. In other words, the vast bulk of the earth is freaking HOT. How do you think that heat escapes? The sky is WIDE OPEN.

    #2: The last decade is FAR from the warmest on record. You read purposeful lies that are endlessly repeated without context. The medieval warm period was MUCH warmer.

    #3: Wrong.

    #4: Ignore ALL paid scientists!

  • @honestann

    1. THE SKY IS WIDE OPEN!

    WRONG. The Earth has an atmosphere which acts as a blanket and slows down the rate at which heat escapes into outer space. Without this blanket there would be no life on Earth because it would be far too cold to support life. Therefore, with (or without CO2) the greenhouse effect is what allows life to exist.

  • @TheElasticJesusRez:  The moon is at the same average distance from the sun as the earth, and has no atmospheric "blanket". If you walk around during the daytime, you will be boiled and baked alive from extreme heat. If you walk around at night, you will be frozen solid from extreme cold. The average temperature is about 75F, which you can verify by digging a deep hole in the moon (or earth) and measuring the temperature. The atmosphere only slows the temp change from day to night.

  • @honestann

    To quote Roy Spencer:

    "...an initially cold Earth would stop warming when the rate at which solar energy is absorbed equals the rate at which infrared energy is lost by the whole Earth-atmosphere system to space."

    drroyspencer(.)com/2009/12/wha­t-if-there-was-no-greenhouse-e­ffect

    Consider why CO2 covered Venus is HOTTER than NO ATMOSPHERE Mercury - a planet that is much closer to the Sun.

    BTW Mr Spencer is a climate sceptic. However, he knows his science.

  • @honestann

    2.

    As a result - and because the Moon has little albedo - the Earth's temp without an atmosphere would be 30 degrees cooler than now, water would turn to ice, and life would cease to exist.

  • @honestann

    2. Actually it is and is verified by NASA, NOAA, HADCRUT, the Royal Society etc.

    ON RECORD refers to that which is verifiable by modern methods. Other than the MWP having no bearing on this present anomaly then I suggest you stop cherry picking events to suit your argument. Of course the Earth has been far warmer in the past but only in THIS period has there been 7 billion humans, 1 billion vehicles & 000s of factories combined with low solar activity.

  • @TheElasticJesusRez: Yes, that is correct. So the QUESTION is, are current temperatures significantly changed by human activity. That is indeed a reasonable QUESTION to ask, and in fact my original guess (before looking into it) was quite possibly yes. Only after looking into the issue carefully did I find out the answer is no. Furthermore, even if the answer is yes, the proposed "solutions" are nothing but scams to enrich the predators-that-be, the predator-class, and global totalitarians.

  • @honestann

    Since all other possible causes have been eliminated - cosmic, volcanic etc AND since solar activity is currently at minimum AND since 100 ppm CO2 has been added to the atmosphere in the past 150 years (at a time when the human race has burned off billions of tonnes of fossil fuels while destroying sinks (rainforest etc) that absorb/recycle CO2) then the only feasible (obvious) explanation for temp and CO2 rise is - wait for it - humankind.

  • @TheElasticJesusRez: Nobody even knows what all other possible causes ARE, much less know in sufficient detail the behavior of the known possible causes. However, it doesn't matter, because the "solutions" proposed by the predators-that-be and predator-class are infinitely worse than just "letting it happen" (even assuming you guys were correct, which you aren't). Furthermore, there are vastly cheaper ways to offset global warming, but they don't enrich the predators, so they're ignored.

  • @honestann

    Hmm!

    I'd like to know the finer details of this conspiracy, because if true, it needs to addressed in Congress, the Supreme Court, and every other court on the planet.

    So why not start the ball rolling and get your very clean and genuine GOP representatives to haul all those many (97%) misguided scientists into court?

    I await with baited breath.

    Better still, just haul Roy Spencer in - king of the sceptic cause - and yet a man who knows his C02 from his Esso blue.

  • @TheElasticJesusRez: Did you say "my GOP representatives"? Hahahahaha!!! You think I'm republican? Hahahahahaha!!! Hahahahahaha!!!! Wow is that a joke. Besides, the entire federal government of the USSA is utterly and completely controlled by the predators-that-be and predator-class (mostly large corporations and central banks). I've got better things to do than waste my life trying to fight people who can steal unlimited sums from unlimited people to fund their activities. Sheesh.

  • @honestann

    "Oh really! People don't know how the universe began but it doesn't stop half this planet lynching dissenters who say it wasn't the handiwork of god."

    At what point does the above statement imply that YOU are religious?

    My advice to you is stop thinking the worst of people and get some fresh air. The science behind global warming is concrete, get over it.

  • @TheElasticJesusRez: You say, "the science behind global warming is concrete".

    Yeah, as in "concrete boots" that the mafia puts on you before they throw you out of the boat into the deep water. The ENTIRE global warming scam is 100% about the globalist predators-that-be and predator-class bleeding you and everyone else dry with their "cap-and-trade-but-keep-breath­ing" scams at the same time establishing more and more "global government" to COMPLETELY ENSLAVE EVERYONE. There is ZERO science.

  • @honestann

    Take them to court then. Seriously, if its all one big Alex jones, 9/11, Rothschild, New world Order, Roswell, little green alien SCAM, then take the guilty to court.

  • @TheElasticJesusRez

    Which court ?

    And on what grounds ?

    Any idea HOW hard it is, for example, to establish the mens rea for Fraud ?

    Especially when the 'defendant. can call upon ten thousand corrupt 'expert witnesses' (the government-funded variety) to support his 'case' ?

    I'd LOVE to see it happen - but it won't.

    And it doesn't take the brains of a bishop (or a Youtube smart-arse) to figure out why !

  • @TheElasticJesusRez

    "The science behind global warming is concrete.............."

    A statement which says EVERYTHING about YOU, and NOTHING about CLIMATE SCIENCE.

    Stick to the Older Religions.....................­..............where 'belief' is of greater importance than demonstrable fact.

  • @honestann

    "Nobody even knows what all other possible causes ARE, much less know in sufficient detail the behavior of the known possible causes."

    Oh really! People don't know how the universe began but it doesn't stop half this planet lynching dissenters who say it wasn't the handiwork of god.

    Volcanic - NO. Cosmic - NO. Solar - NO. Geothermal - NO. Magnetosphere - NO.

    Oh hold on. 7 billion people x 1 billion cars x millions of factories x ...

    Duh! I wonder what it could be?

  • @TheElasticJesusRez: Look, I already told you I'm atheist and a scientist. So you and I agree that people who make a big deal about religion are almost entirely insane in the most incredible and absurd ways. So don't try to hang those insane people around my neck - I agree they are insane, I agree the ignore evidence, I agree the believe and advocate the most absurd things imaginable. They are as much my enemy as yours. Our disagreement is global warming real AND what [not] to do about it.

  • @TheElasticJesusRez: I should mention this too. Most environmentalists have been COMPLETELY scammed. I am adamantly anti-pollution (air, water, other), pro-rainforests, pro-planting massive quantities of oxygen-producing plant-life and organisms, and so forth. It IS outrageous what is done to the earth, I agree with that. However, most environmentalists are fooled into spending their time on this FRAUD which is global warming. The predator-class FOOLED YOU to distract from real pollution.

  • @honestann

    ???

    I said Earth has been cooling/warming for past 4.5 billion years, in answer to your statement that it has been happening for past 20,000 years.

    DUH!

    What next, Noah led the animals 2 x 2?

  • @TheElasticJesusRez: Sorry, I'm atheist and a scientist-engineer. So you won't be finding any "faith-based" answers or ideas from me. However, I don't have faith in "offical answers" either, especially those bought and paid-for by know predators and global government advocates. It takes quite a bit of investigation in this field to form a good "educated opinion" (or "educated guess" if you prefer). I'm not surpirsed many who haven't dug deep have wrong impressions and opinions.

  • @honestann

    In summary, your 'assumption' that temperatures are not increasing is scientifically unjustifiable since an increase in CO2 is commensurate with an increase in temp.

    Warm = more CO2 being released from oceans.

    Cold = more CO2 being trapped in oceans and ice.

    And since there are 7 billion humans happily farting + shitting and driving vehicles + working in factories + heating up homes + destroying carbon sinks, then THERE HAS to be MORE CO2 in the atmosphere.

    CO2 = Heat.

  • @TheElasticJesusRez: You need to read and think more carefully. I also suggest that you go find long term temperature and CO2 graphs (on the same graph) and notice that temperature increases and decreases tends to LEAD increases and decreases in CO2. Therefore it is clear temperature causes CO2 more than the reverse. However, it is also true that increases in CO2 can sometimes tend to increase temperature, so the relationship is very much non-trivial due to feedback effects. Not so simple!

  • @honestann

    Only just read your comment.

    Thank God not EVERYONE on Youtube is a complete dunderhead.

    Yes - Science and Politics is a noxious mix, and very, very bad for our collective health !!

    To say nothing of our sanity........................­..

  • @honestann mate, I could not agree more. well put !

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more