Added: 4 years ago
From: LogicalEuropean
Views: 16,926
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,982)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • are you people stupid??? melonine is the chemical in our skin that gives us the darker (black) color and EVERYONE (kings and so-called "gods" included) thats we have tested had large amounts of it in their skin. so the lightest of them would be DARKER than the average black man today

  • Comment removed

  • @MrTickleSprout sit down. Beja people are the one who created ancient egypt.. therefore a negro tribe.

  • @LetMeTasteYa Sorry. The first civilization in that land were the Badarian people. yes, they were almost certainly negroid. But later, dynastic Kemet was ruled by foreign invaders from Asia and Europe, Hyksos, Persians, Romans, Greeks, etc. There were a few Nubian pharaohs during the 25th dynasty and therefore we find mummies of several "races". It was the Greeks who called it "Egyptos" and they were not negro people at all. "White" people came in and took over which should surprise no one.

  • @MooPotPie badarian were not different from Naqadan. who later became the ancient egyptians. According to anthropologists, Beja are the closest people to the Predynastic and Ancient Egyptians. The pharaohs of the 17th , 19th , 20th and 21rst dynasties (like Ramses and TUT) were of Beja ancestry. It was the greeks who called the colossus of Amenhotep III "Memnon". Greeks mistook Amenhotep for an ethiopian king called Memnon

  • @LetMeTasteYa Okay. The term Beja was new to me….but what is confusing is that I assumed them to be negroid, which the wavy red-haired, caucasian-featured Ramses II clearly was not. In the centuries between the Naqadan and the time of Ramses, Egypt had become quite the ethnic melting pot so nothing should be surprising. Modern pseudoscientific notions of "race" would have been completely foreign there before the time of the Greeks who drove the whole civilization into the ground ultimately.

  • @LetMeTasteYa Maybe with the obstacle of the Arab-biased Dr. Zahi Hawass out of the way, some real DNA results will be released. Let the chips fall where they may, then we can all have a good laugh … or maybe not. :)

  • This video is an insult to African culture & history. It shows nothing but the ignorance & admiration that "White ppl" have for African/Black ppl. Ancient Egypt nor Africa had (& still doesn't) nothing to do with "White ppl"....not to mention the music was horrible. (Even tho, those African/Blacks invented that genre of music known as rock&roll) But don't take my word for it....just take credit for it like you always do.

  • @KingTutankhamun100 Your remarks are an embarrassment to science, history and educated people everywhere. YOU are the insult. Why is it so hard to believe that Europeans conquered ancient Kemet (later "Egyptos") and ran the place, probably as a minority? Ever heard of 20th century South Africa? How about North America? Israel? Egypt was no different… that said, I'll be the first to agree the music in this video is dreadful. Real black rock music is a hell of a lot better than that noise.

  • @MooPotPie Let's get real here….Today's racial classifications date back to European white-supremacists who attempted to divide the human SPECIES into races. It's really not going to do any of us any good to drag that shit with us into the 21st century. The ancient Egyptians had no concept of this nonsense and we have to get past it to understand them.

  • @MooPotPie Its funny you mention present time "20th" century. Well as a result of "COLONIZATION" where Europeans "invaded" another country & persuaded its native ppl to believe they were helping them but actually stealing the countries resources, is a result of how Europeans began to "conquer". But evidentially that wasn't the case for Egypt. This was the first place they invaded. & as you can see thats when the kingdom fell.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @KingT I agree. The greatest achievements in building and technology seem to occur in the earliest period of Kemet. I'm pretty sure they had free electricity and machine technology. (I'm dead serious). The Sphinx and Giza pyramids must be from this pre-dynastic time. I'd also speculate that the Ark of the Covenant, now in Ethiopia, was housed in the so-called sarcophagus of the Great Pyramid. The dimensions match. It was all decline from there. The Greeks ran the place into the ground.

  • @KingTutankhamun100 During the 18th dynasty, Kemet invaded and captured Nubia (Syria today), their long-time trading partner for gold. But Nubia regained its independence by the 19th dynasty, and by the 25th there we find Nubian Pharaohs in Kemet. Kemet had been invaded earlier by the Asiatic Hyksos people but eventually expelled them. Kemet was THE cosmopolitan melting pot of its day, explaining why the mummies of its rulers appear to be of several ethnicities.

  • @MooPotPie Dating back to the beginning of this civilization, to the fall of the kingdom, there was NO outside influence. The native Africans built & maintained this civilization. & I am not sure which Pharaohs or rulers you speak of, but none appear to be of several ethnicities.

  • @KingTutankhamun100 Take a look at Ramses II, just to name one. Google images for his mummy with it's wavy red hair. He was a native Egyptian since of course he was born there, but he most certainly was not what anyone would call a "black" man. There are black mummies and easily identifiable as such. No one can understand ancient Egypt if they are stuck on some kind of "race" trip or simplistically equates Africa (especially Northeast Africa) with modern conceptions of "black". LOOK at them.

  • @MooPotPie Knowing that Africans were the first to inhabit this place we call Earth, leads to the fact that it is the vary origins ALL races stem from. Africans come in all shapes, sizes, colors, ranging with a wide variety of facial features( as seen in Africans today). Africans sometimes paint skin & hair red( as seen in Africans today). You are just basing your views on the vast features of Africans.

  • @KingTutankhamun100 I do not dispute the Out Of Africa theory of human origin. I'm just reporting what I've seen in the Cairo museum. Vast features is right. It's all on the internet too if you care to look. Ramses hair was determined to be red from microscopic evaluation of the follicles. It's not henna or paint, nor is it "Afro" texture. It was inherited from his father Seti. Either way, he does not appear to have been an Arab as today's Egyptians would have us believe.

  • @MooPotPie Since you don't support the "Out Of Africa theory"...& you acknowledge the vast features that Africans posses, then you should not base your views on something as simple as "hair".

  • @KingTutankhamun100 Claiming there was NO outside influence in one the major trading ports of the ancient world is absurd. Are you even denying the Nubian influence? What are you smoking? You might want to find more objective sources for your "facts". You seem to have some kind of racial axe to grind. That's not science. Go to the Cairo Museum. I have. You can see the mummies for yourself, black, white, asian …even a few that look downright alien.

  • @MooPotPie The Nile river was the first cultural highway, which stretched down through Africa. Not Europe or Asia. Asians(Lol) & Europeans have absolutely NOTHING to do with this "ancient" African civilization. What cultural traditions & influences do you speak of? The ones that are still practiced in some of todays modern Africans? You argument is simply based on the European belief that "whites had to be involved in EVERY great civilization". If so, they wouldn't of INVADED & COLONIZED.

  • @KingTutankhamun100 Maybe if I were a white person, I'd be burdened by such beliefs, but again, I'm just telling you what I have seen, firsthand, in the Cairo Museum and elsewhere. Take it or leave it. Doesn't faze me. I find both Eurocentric and Afrocentric theories to be equally flawed since they are based, not on scientific evidence, but pridefulness, emotion, racialism, and every other type of bias. Eurocentrism is additionally burdened by fear and guilt. Science requires zero bias.

  • @MooPotPie Its funny you mention "Eurocentric" & "Science". The science in which European scholars have brainwashed the world, to implicate involvement in ancient African civilizations. Ever wonder why you barley see Non Europeans historians speaking the facts of their OWN history? Why you may ask? Because most are discredited & labeled (Afrocentrist) = a term used by Europeans as a scapegoat, to simply stamp a label on Africans for studying their OWN history.

  • @KingTutankhamun100 During the 18th dynasty, Kemet invaded and captured Nubia (Syria today), their long-time trading partner for gold. But Nubia regained its independence by the 19th dynasty, and by the 25th there we find Nubian Pharaohs in Kemet. Kemet had been invaded earlier by the Asiatic Hyksos people but eventually expelled them. Kemet was THE cosmopolitan melting pot of its day, explaining why the mummies of its rulers appear to be of several ethnicities.

  • mixed with Asiatic and Caucasoid peoples who spread westward, laterally across the continent. Berbers predominate in the northwestern part of Africa, but the area also hosts various black Berber peoples and equatorial Africans, as well. Over centuries, there some intermarriage between Maghreb Berbers, who generally are classified as "Caucasoid," with black Africans, producing a population with a wide range of phenotypical characteristisc,

  • LOL What a waste of time on a video, with witch craft music. LOL Don't u know God knows who he created first and u can never fool him? Get over it like the rest.

  • biggest pile of shit i have ever seen... where are your references? where are the carvings, sculptures, papyrus etc..... all you have put down is words. there is a clear cut reason why the sculptures of ancient kemet have had their nose and lips blasted off. because when WHITE people saw the amazing wonders of the region they knew it bore no resemblence to them. they knew they were black people and hence tried to destroy them. this has been documented by one of NAPOLEONS army. nice try tho mupet

  • @chking69 When the pharoah died he became the new Osiris and a god himself. In the image to the right of the Opening of the Mouth Ceremony, note the skin tones of the mummy and Anubis. Both are divine beings and both have golden skin. Compare this to the priest and the mourning women, who have the classic reddish-brown and pale pink skin tones of humans. Your stupid

  • @chking69 Urban legend alert. The 15th century Egyptian Arab historian al-Maqrīzī, attributed the loss of the nose to  Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr, a Sufi Muslim from the khanqah of Sa'id al-Su'ada in 1378 because he found people praying to the statue.This is 400 years before Napoleon. Even without it's nose, it is clearly the face shape of a black African. Probably female as well. I'm going to place my bets on the Egyptian version of the story. Thought I'd share this to clear up the Napoleon B.S.

  • I would not want to be associated with Pharoah anyways. Afrocentrics are atheist at best. They don't believe in Abraham(pbuh) as a prophet that God choose and his offspring. God made a promise to Abraham(pbuh) that his *righeous* offsprings will lead the people. Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him and his family) was the descendant of Ismail son of Hagar and Abraham(pbuh). Moses and Jesus (peace be upon them) were also descedant of Isaac son of Abraham(pbuh) and Sarah.

  • DIVERSITY OF AFRICA

    

    watch?v=3N9ZN6KSfdg

  • Just because some have dark skin doesnt necessarily mean they are black.. Its more about facial features.

    For example. Both China and France are on the Asian continent (france is in the european subcontinent of asia).

    Both a chinese person and a french person have "white" or de pigmented skin color but they are not considered the same race because of facial features.

    In the same way, an Indian, a nigerian, and an ethiopian all have dark skin but its facial features that set them apart. 

  • @lar5220 One can say the same of the inverse; just because some have light skin, that doesn't necessarily mean Egyptians were uniformly 'white.' Egypt was a massive, wealthy empire, which lured people from all parts of the then known world; you had the Libyans to the left, Persians to the right, Syrians above that, Greeks, Italics, Phoenicians, Baltic cultures in Europe, and the Nubian, Ethiopian, and sub-Saharan peoples below, among many, many others. Egypt was diverse.

  • @Caqui That's pc bullshit the Egyptians looked more or less the way they do now anthropologist who study there skulls said they have the same skull as modern Egyptian and north Africans who are not negroids it's a joke that some fools still believe in that 1970s pc bullshit still even now that they have DNA and cat scans that can show what they look like in life and it's just like they do now no suprize lol

  • @lar5220 The Swiss head of the archaeological expedition told the BBC that the find was of worldwide importance.

    The black pharaohs, as they were known, ruled over a mighty empire stretching along the Nile Valley 2,500 years ago.

    Professor Bonnet says that this shows that the Egyptians were not content with simply conquering Kush.

    They also wanted to obliterate the memory of the black pharaohs and their unique culture from the face of the earth. Reserach The Badarian culture

  • @dudley1957 what's your point we know black nubians invalid Egypt for 80 years the was a drought that starved most the people at the time which made them week

  • @lar5220 Who are the ancient people of Egypt................is my point

  • @dudley1957 Go to the small towns in Egypt where invaders like black Nubians Greeks Romans and Arabs did not go and you will see what they look like the people there look like Indians from India who look like tan skinned whites that's what theY basically look like

  • @lar5220 So, you are the Ancient or indigneous people of Egypt. Romans, Greeks, Arabs, and Persians invaded or migrated to the Northern African regions:. Timelines 30 BC Romans, 331 Greeks ruled, 525BC Persians, and Arabs 642 AD Islamic arabs invade Egypt. I know the Berbers are not the indigneous people of Northern Africa. They became a new Species of people. Different Cultures mixed part of human behavior. These peoples are not the indigneous or ancient peoples of the land.

  • @dudley1957 people were migrating their in Africa in and out for the last 80000 years means they were not black only ,,5000 years ago which is not even that long ago in terms of evolution and black made no large ruins temple statues look at black Africa there is nothing like that it was the neolithic peoples who migrated there that made that civilisation

  • @lar5220 Archaeologists in Sudan are unearthing one of the world’s oldest civilisations – an ancient kingdom which began to fourish 5,000 years ago, hundreds of miles to the south of ancient Egypt.

    Excavations – directed by Swiss archaeologists, Professor Charles Bonnet and Dr. Matthieu Honegger

    Research the Badarian culture it the Earliest Culture in Egypt. Who were they. research

  • @dudley1957 lol what they find in Sudan human habitation can be found allong Nile river don't confuse that with civilization

  • @lar5220 What is your definiton of Civilization.The Badarian culture is the first farming culture in Upper Egypt. The Badarian people already used metal and they produced the first glazed objects. They lived in small villages in Upper Egypt. Settlements seem to be occupied only for a short times. The huts seem to be built from very lightweight material..About 600 tombs are excavated and recorded.

  • @dudley1957 roads trade farming live stock large cities temples writing tools civilization not fire pits and some pottery which I know thats what u are taking about

  • No large cities, what is your definition of Civilization? What is the Badarian culture, please expalin.

  • @dudley1957 Nomads by definition don't have civilization the can have culture but that differeint civilization means people who live in permanent cities and have specialized jobs

  • @dudley1957 There nomads

  • There nomads Economically, civilizations display more complex patterns of ownership and exchange than less organized societies. Living in one place allows people to accumulate more personal possessions than nomadic people. Some people also acquire landed property, or private ownership of the land. Because a percentage of people in civilizations do not grow their own food, they must trade their goods and services for food in a market system, or receive food through the levy of tribute,

  • Logical European my ass, change that profile name it does not fit you at all.

  • I hope people know this about egypt and it's paintings, that some of those paintings of the original people has been repainted and not in the original text or color. If u look at the paintings alot of them seem more fresher than others cause they are. I watched a documentery when a man asked a egyptian authority can he reapint over the original painting he said yes. He painted the people in the original painting a lighter color than they originaly was.

  • was Egypt Black? the answer is yes.

  • @Prodigyrp of course no,because egyptian are north african and  north african aren t blacks and i m north african amazigh and i m not black

  • @tanit19866 The famous super model Iman is North African! She looks like a native African to me!

  • @guanabana118 sorry my friend but she isnt from north africa she is from somalia its in the centre, and not all african are black , africa its a big continent and beatiful and we are so different and we are proud to be african

  • @tanit19866 Now we're getting into semantics! How far north is north? I'm assuming by North Africa you mean the Mediterranean coastal region. Somalia is not in the center. It is by the Horn of Africa on the coast of the Red Sea across from the Arabian Peninsula which is considered North East Africa. When Iman first came on the scene she was hailed as the world's first BLACK supermodel, something that she never challenged herself! She has been known to refer to herself as a Black woman.

  • hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha­hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha­hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha­hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha­hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha­hahahahahahahaha white hahahahahahahhahahahahahahahah­ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah­ahawhat a joke

  • @undercover65 OH MAN.. GO EASY GO EASY...

  • Silly Afrocentrists! Listen 2 Count Volney!

    "Those piles of ruins which u see in that narrow valley watered by the Nile, are the remains of opulent cities, the pride of the ancient kingdom of Ethiopia. There a people now forgotten, discovered while others were yet barbarians, the elements of the arts & sciences. A race of men now rejected from society 4 their sable skin & frizzled hair, founded on the study of the laws of nature, those civil & religious systems which still govern the universe."

  • @ausaurwest

    Phwahahahahahahahaha

    PHWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA

    fUCKING JACKASS RACIST CUNT. LOLOLL WHAT IS THIS NONSENSE WRITTEN BY SOME HISTORICAL POMPOUS TWIT TRYING TO JUSTIFY HIS SLAVE INCOME BY DENIGRATING THE VALUE OF BALCK PEOPLE TO HIS FELLOW WHITE. ridiculous. wE SEE THROUGH IT, MANY white PEOPLE ARE EMBARRASSED BY THESE REVELATIONS

  • @DEFACTO9 Hmmmm? It appears as though my sarcasm flew right over your head. I thought it was obvious. But, maybe it wasn't. With all due respect, your comments are a complete misinterpretation of the quote by Volney. He is showing reverence to the Blacks that he knows built the pyramids and brought civilization to the uncivilized. Go back and reread it bruh.

  • Can somebody define for me what is meant by black? Before such a question can be asked there has to be an agreement on what the definition of a "black" person is

  • @TRUTHTEACHER2007 : a person ( not literally Black) close to the color Black or brown

  • @09Twister Okay, but you do realize that there are many Afro Americans who have white skin, (not Albinos). Okay if we are meaning dark skinned African people then yes the people who originated this civilization were black skinned, but realize that just as not all afro Americans have black or brown skin not all Egyptians had black or brown skin either. The more accurate question would be were they an indigenous African people/culture.

  • @TRUTHTEACHER2007 : I agree

  • @TRUTHTEACHER2007 : im tired of the race thing

    

  • @09Twister I am too. I think its enough to show that the ideology of intelligence being linked to skin color is false. It was all a mind game created to justify world wide criminality. That's all it was. Arguing with racists is a pointless waste of time because they're not going to wake up one day and love us. Best to rest assured in the knowledge that we create our destinies no one else and focus on creating our futures.

  • You must watch the videos:

    "white man tells truth"

    youtube.com/watch?v=3TRBVMGugx­8

    youtube.com/watch?v=Pov46rVESz­U&feature=related

  • @ajahni Well i tried to watch those but they dont exist can you repost

  • @ajahni well this white is stupid as you ..!!! we are not white or black ..!! if you consider anyone whos not white is black so you have to educate urself cuz people are not black and white only there is a lot of races

  • I knew they were white, you cant help but see the same thing today, tell me just what have negros done great??? they have nothing and most IQs show that, they are a very different race then us, they still eat each other in Africa and live in mud huts banging anything that moves with aids, take a drive threw the getto today its just like africa you'll be lucky to get out alive, from greatness???? I dont think so hell take away the fake nails and fake hair and you have a chimp, they so crack me up

  • they were green not black or white, you people are stupid.

  • They was brown skin africans like Ethiopians hahaha african ppl come in all different color then Nubians.... stupid video!

  • I know black people who, if they had lighter skin, could pass for white. Facial features count for little or nothing. And as for ancient Egyptian depictions: painted white was meant to denote someone who was deceased and painted black was meant to denote someone in a position of authority (as Osiris was frequently painted black). Ancient Egyptians were a more pure black race descended from Mizraim (a grandson of Ham). Only later on did Greeks and Semitic ("from Shem") races interbreed with them

  • ok if egypt was not "black' then why not teach the philosophy why give the credit for the immaculate conception to the greeks why not embrace your "white" heritage why not teach the truth about your people so that we may all get along since all of our origins would come from AFRICA

  • Egyptian sculptors never look like as Africans.They look like exactly as Indians.

    Ancient Menes was from Solar dynasty of ancient India.Ancient Indian records confirm this,.

  • @Saraswathiputra I dare you to back up that B.S you spouting with some actual facts.

  • All I have to say is I did some research and found sculptures of the first king of Egypt, I suggest that you do the same, find his name and then find some sculptures of him and you will see that he is Black. I am not saying that Egyptians were black or Arabic ( for sure not Europeans). What I am saying is that if you see sculptures of the first king you will see that he is Black.

  • It is false and racist that anyone has any business taking "pride" in the "achievements" of one's distant ancestors, since intelligence, creativity, etc., are not inherited, and furthermore no one can take any credit for anything they have not achieved themselves.

  • "Libya and Egypt show the smallest genetic distances with the European populations, including the Iberian Peninsula..." Bosch et al 2005

    LOL of course they do, we are speaking of Ancient Egypt not Modern Egypt. Get your head on right. And stop trying to be dishonest. It wont work. Ill catch you again.

  • Not so fast, mental midget...you fell right into my trap!

    "Libya and Egypt are also the smallest genetic distances away from European populations. Demic diffusion during the NEOLITHIC period could explain the genetic similarity between northeast Africa and Europe through a parallel process of gene flow FROM THE Near East"

    What part of NEOLITHIC, GENETIC SIMILARITY & GENE FLOW from the NEAR EAST do you not understand?

  • @StTigray1 I see you continue to ignore the study I posted, yet you proclaim some sort of false "victory" in the face of defeat because you cant refute it - which is apparently why you have this glaring inferiority complex.

    You're a sub Saharan who has nothing in common with advanced ancient civilizations - or modern for that matter.

  • I was right! you did misquote Here is what Shi really said.

    "presumably the most ancient lineage of the D/E haplogroup

    was only found in Africans from Nigeria [2], supporting

    the "Out of Africa" hypothesis about modern

    human origin. The sub-haplogroup E (E-M40), defined by

    M40/SRY4064 and M96, was also suggested originated in

    Africa [3-6]" ( Y chromosome evidence of earliest modern human settlement in

    East Asia and multiple origins of Tibetan and Japanese populations

    Shi 2008)

  • This finding is in agreement with morphological data that suggest that populations with sub-Saharan morphological elements were present in northeastern Africa, from the Paleolithic to at least the early Holocene, and diffused northward to the Levant and Anatolia beginning in the Mesolithic.

  • Egyptian Crania, dental and limb studies confirm negroid character of early M-78 bearers DNA analysis centers E-M78 at Wadi Halfa in Egypt near the Sudan. Wadi Halfa samples are clustered with dark skinned tropical types such as Africans. Linmb studies also cluster Wadi Halfans clustering with Sub-Saharans and dental studies confirm the same pattern. (Battaglia 2008)

  • You're not refuting anything. The ENTIRE E hg is of Asian origin. E-M78 is a descendent of E and is stated to originate in Egypt or Libya Cruciani et al. (2007).

    Waldi Halfa doesn't cluster with A.E.

    "Ancient Egyptians had simple, mass reduced teeth." Irish & Turner, 1990; Irish, 1993, 1997, 1998a,b. 

    The dentition of a Mesolithic population (8,000-11,000 years old) from Wadi Halfa, Sudan, can be characterized as morphologically complex, massive.." Greene et al., 2005

  • @StTigray1 the observation that teeth of American blacks are larger than those of American whites. (Tissue contributions to sex and race: Differences in tooth crown size of deciduous molars Edward F. Harris, Joseph D. Hicks, Betsy D. Barcroft College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee 2001)

  • @phoenician7 LOL Owned! Son HAHAHAHa now that your bogus quote was uncovered, you respond, by just throwing out quotes on random subjects, you are even quoting studies that go against your statements......Love it! Ok now let me get you back on course. This is what I have proven, and what you havent. All modern research shows that Ancient Egyptians clustered with Sub Saharans, Ill make it simple. Do You Have Anything To refute the above statement? If so then bring it out.

  • Your senile comments and gaping holes of insanity lack a lot to be desired. You STILL haven't refuted anything with your nonsense. You won't find a study that trumps Irish, it doesn't exist. ALL modern research debunks your Afrocentric ideology and the only reason you won't refute it but hide behind the typical "LOL" is because you can't.

  • @StTigray1 I also find it interesting that you had NOTHING to say when you were exposed for misquoting Shi.

    Embarrassed? Of course.

  • @phoenician7

    Son I already used a study to debunk brace who lifted from a chosen few samples, Your misquotes were made glaringly obvious. There is no need for a rant because my work is done the ball is in your court. Oh and yes I put what Zarahan said in quotes, There was no need to remake the wheel. You have been served and I hope that is not all you have. If so I am still waiting.

  • @StTigray1 Of course you have nothing left to say, you've been debunked and trashed all over this channel. You steal other racists work and can't defend your false ideology with a scientific study. Obviously you refuse to comment on Brace, Irish, Shi but continue to inject your racist opinion, you do not have any substantiation for your arguments. That much is obvious.

  • @phoenician7

    You have said all that to say nothing. You dont have one lick of evidence to prove that Egyptians did not cluster with Sub-Saharans

  • @StTigray1 When you combine Caucasian-looking hair with Caucasian dental and cranial records, as well as Caucasian DNA, there is really nothing to talk about here.

    Subs do not cluster with A.E. and you have YET to prove it. Now you run along and be a good boy and find an anthropologist or Egyptologist that claims Tut was a negroid.

  • @phoenician7

    Your argument simply recycles the old 'true negro' model, using Niger-Congos as the strawman. Niger-Congo speakers are but one group of black Africans, who, gasp, do not all look alike. Brace 2005 shows that in any event, Egyptians group 1st with other Africans before Europeans or Mid Easterners.

  • @StTigray1 You might posture as if you're arguing with me but you're not. These are scientific studies and you can't refute it, and you cant seem to present a study that does. Your reading is as poor as your comprehension. Egyptians DO NOT cluster at all with Sub Saharans, hell even east Africans cluster closer to Europeans than Sub Saharans considering their substantial Caucasoid DNA.

  • @StTigray1

    "there is no such evident presence (of Sub Saharans) in the North African or Egyptian samples. (The questionable contribution of the Neolithic and the Bronze Age to European craniofacial form C. Loring Brace 2006)

  • @StTigray1

    "Our data, then, provide no support for the claim that there was a 'strong negroid element' in Predynastic Egypt." Brace et al.

  • @phoenician7

    Second, Brace 2005 shows that early peoplein Europe looked like Africans, so studies alleging mass Caucasoid influxes, invasions whatever based on older Euros are really comparing African looking people in Europe to Africans in Africa. Whichever way you slice it- the primary grouping is Africans. The reason European populations appear to group with Egyptians is that OLDER Euros are being used, who as Brace notes, looked like Africans to begin with.. Sorry ..

  • LMAO! If ancient Europeans were negroids they would cluster with Congo, Dahomay and Haya, but they don't at any age. They're right where they're expected, ancient and modern and consistently cluster with Egypt. I could post dozens of articles debunking your racist assumptions and your knee-jerk reaction would be a "LOL" for lack of intellect.

  • @StTigray1

    Besides you lifted this BS directly from Zarahan @ Egyptsearch a BS black supremacist website.  You cant even THINK for yourself! Damn you're a dumb racist.

  • Bosch's study also selectively sampled only small parts of N Africa, then compared that to distant "sub-Saharan" populations- This is called skewed sampling. One is careful to exclude large parts of the Saharan zone including Mali, Chad, Niger and the Sudan to obtain the "results" they wanted. This is selective manipulation of samples to generate a false picture.  I hope this is not all you got?

  • @StTigray1 DAMN! Another C&P job from the Eatshit forum. What's the deal with plagiarizing (STEALING) other peoples work? What do you racist expect Bosch to do? Sample every individual across the continent? No, he set control sampling and since you don't like the outcome of the study, "By contrast, the genetic contribution of sub-Saharan Africa appears to be small" you resort to typical Afrocentric whining. Other detailed studies show that the Sub Saharan input is derived from recent times.

  • @StTigray1 Crania, dental and limb studies do NOT confirm the false claims you're making. Wadi Halfa is in SUDAN, not EGYPT so naturally they would cluster with negroids, however they do have SUBSTANTIAL Caucasoid DNA. E is Asian origin and that little edit job you did on Shi tells me everything I need to know about your Afrocentric agenda and lies.

  • @phoenician7

    Keep up the good work. AFROcentrics r nothing BUT a tool. From slavery now being used as a tool still a slave. The theory of ALL originate from Africa is as racist as we came from monkeys. They are enslaved COLONIZED & ASSIMILATED. Too blind & ZERO HERITAGE. Easily debunked just by looking at culture. I pity these savages.

    FATHER ASIA has influenced many, if not all.

  • @HANNIBALbengal Have to be a little pathetic to still try and claim Egypt in this day and age. Pretty sad.

  • @phoenician7 Boy you sure are stupid if you think that E is of Asian Origin, I dont mind having a debate, but lets not make up stuff

  • and also if you look at all of the people who you named, they all have full lips(being that you want to take the physical route). what other race of people have full or big lips. you often find negros with eagle like noses(as you said) but how many euroids have you seen with big lips?

  • first of all what is negroid, secondly all negros dont have nappy hair, and the ones with good hair dont mean they got it from some other race

  • Hello,ancient Pharaoh Menes and and his men were from Solar dynasty of ancient India.This is the truth.

  • White masons can never fully understand the sacred of Egypt, because they respect not the origion of its magical knowledge, the black african will walk silently as he has throughout history given nothing attributed to him for credit, while the entire history of mankind and the truth in its purest form lays locked away in his genes (dna)! Too bad you keep searching!

  • Africa came before india as so the African before the Indian, before the arab, before the Chinese, before the phonecians, before the minoans, before the spaniard, before the evolution period into any race change ever took place, Africans walked the earth as black negroes under a very complex and sacred spiritual system governing their every move! You just wont know because the white sheet is over your eyes you only see what you want!

  • Interesting to try to post this when all modern DNA analysis of Ancient Egyptians, cluster with Black Africans. Even without the DNA, the culture as well as the artifacts all point to the Egyptians, initially being a Black African civilization. Now later, yes there was great admixture from invasions. Also African DNA has the greatest diversity and range. In unmixed Africans you will find a complete range of features except white skin, so to say non-negro features is erroneous at best.

  • the real egyptians are black

  • Really innapropriate, SHITTY music to use on a video about Egypt.

  • In India Solar dynasty continued creating greatest princes like lord Rama and continued even after Greek ambassadors arrived for the court of ChandraGupta Maurya.Those Greek historians referred in their reference book' Indica' also..We have complete details upto last king of Solar dynasty.

    In Egypt Solar dynasty lost to Nubian king.Here in India,last and 124th Kind.Sumitra,who was the last Solar king of Ayodhya from solar dynasty. In the fourth century BC.

  • 45.ASAMANJA - Sagara's surviving son was not made king due to his bad conduct.

    HE IS OUR EGYPTIAN HERO AND FOUNDER AND FIRST PHARAOH MENES OR ASA MANJA

    SAGARA MADE HIS YOUNGER BROTHER AS EMPEROR AGAINST ALL RULES OF SOLAR DYNASTY THAT ELDEST SHOULD RULE.

    PAINED BY THIS,MENES WITH HIS SUPPORTERS TRAVELLING BEYOND HIS FATHER TERRITORY CONQUERING EGYPT AND UNITING LOWER AND UPPER EGYPT ACCEPTING THE TITLE PHARAOH STARTED TO RULE THE EGYPT.

    RECORDS ARE VERY CLEAR.

  • 44.Sagara - He recaptured Ayodhya from the "Haihaya" and "Taljanghi" Kshtriyas. He then attempted to perform the horse sacrifice,Ashwamedha Yajna. THE FIRST CONQUERED MANY AREAS AS FAR AS EGYPTIAN BORDERS

  • 34.Tryyaruna

    35.Satyavrata or Trishanku - His original name was Satyavrata, but he committed three (tri) sins, and hence got the name Trishanku. First, while he was a prince, he misbehaved and was temporarily exiled from the kingdom.

    36.Harishchandra - He is known for his honesty, truth and devotion to duty or Dharma.

    37.Rohitashva - He was the son of Harishchandra. He founded town of Rohtas Garh in Rohtas district, Bihar and Rohtak, originallyRohitakaul, meaning from the family of Rohit.

  • 26.Purukutsa & Harita - Purukutsa performed the Ashwamedha Yajna (horse sacrifice). He married Nagkanya "Narmada". He helped Nagasin their war against the Gandharvas. Harithasa gotra linage starts from here.

    27.Traddasyu

    28.Sambhoot

    29.Anaranya II

    30.Trashdashva

    31.Haryashva II

    32.Vasuman

    33.Tridhanva

  • 22.Prasenjit I - His daughter Renuka was married to sage Jamdgni. She was mother of Parashurama.

    23.Yuvanashva II - He was married to Gori, daughter of the Chandravanshi king Matinaar.

    24.Mandhata - He became a famous and Chakravarti (ideal universal ruler) king. He defeated most of the other kings of his time. He married Bindumati, a daughter of the Chandravanshi king.

    25.Ambarisha - Great devotee of Vishnu.

  • 8).Anena or Anaranya 9.Prithu 10)Vishvagashva 11.Ardra or Chandra

    12.Yuvanashva I13.Shravast - He founded the town of Shravasti near Kosala14).Vrihadashva15)Kuvala­sh va - He killed a Rakshasa named Dhundh. It is said that Dhundhar region and the Dhund river are named after Dhund. Eighteen of Kuvalashva's sons died in the battle with Dhund. Thereafter, Kuvalashva was called "Dhundhumara".16Dridhashva

    17.Pramod18.Haryashva I

    19.Nikumbh20.Santashva21)Krish­a sva

  • 6)Vikukshi - He is said to have eaten the meat of a rabbit at the time of Shraddhaand was known as Shasad. His son was Kakuthsa or Puranjay.

    7)Kakutstha or Puranjaya - He was a brave king and fought in the Devasur Sangram. His original name was Puranjaya

  • 4)Manu or Vaivasvata Manu - the King of all mankind.I can write about each.Space is not permitting me.These are most ancient informations.

    5)Ikshvaku(Son of Manu) - the first prominent monarch of this dynasty, giving the dynasty its another name the Ikshvaku dynasty.

  • 3)Vivasvan or Vaivasvata (one of the sons of Lord Sun) - the Sun God, progenitor of the clan. His parents were the sage Kashyapa, father of all beings, and Aditi, Aditi's 12 sons, the Adityas

  • THE IMPECCABLE SOLAR(RE) DYNASTY LIST;

    1)Marichi (Son of Brahma)

    2Kashyapa is the son of Marichi and Kala. Kashyapa is regarded as the father of humanity. His sons from Aditi, the sky goddess, and the daughter of Daksha Prajapati are called Adityas (Sons of Aditi), they were, Aṃśa, Aryaman, Bhaga, Dhūti, Mitra, Pūṣan, Śakra, Savitṛ, Tvaṣṭṛ, Varuṇa, Viṣṇu, and Vivasvat or Vivasvan

  • I have researched all history of Egypt which confirm the Egypt got it pinnacle of it culture and civilization only after the arrival Aha Manja or Manes or Manasyu from ancient India.

    Verify Solar dynasty list from ancient India and it antiquity.

    Verify yourself!

  • The first human beings in Greece probably migrated there long ago from the African continent via the eastern Mediterranean and the Anatolia;

    ANCIENT GREECE: From Prehistoric to Hellenistic Times by Thomas R. Martin

    (1996)

  • New theories point that first humans in Europe could have crossed through the straits of Gibraltar. And if you're asking youself if they had boats or the technology to build them, the answer is yes. Anyway, archaeology is studying the truth of the Homo Antecessor found in Atapuerca, Spain.

  • "A great civilised power during the period in which

    Europe was being overrun by savage tribes. Arithmetic,

    architecture,geometry,astrolog­y, all the arts and nearly

    all of today's industries and sciences were known while

    the Greeks lived in caves. The pattem of our thinking

    originated in Africa"

    Reclause, The Earth and its Inhabitants, Vol.1 (1893)

  • False. The African way of thinking has nothing to do with the Western culture. We, Western Europeans, are cultural sons of the Romans and grandsons of the Greeks. If something was characteristic of Classical times (Vth Century BC) is the opposite way of thinking between Western peoples (mainly Greeks, Celts and Latins, whose values were based on civic obligations, responsibilities of citizenship/freedom and authonomy) and Eastern kingdoms (who valued efficiency, unity, piety).

  • Comment removed

  • NON_SENSE

    Like most of these brainless assertions that the Kamites were non African and that some how Africans all look alike, it is with out merit and lacks MAAT.

    We know the truth many of us can read Medu Neter. I am teaching my classes The ancient language too. Your choice of music reflects your mind set and disrespect also.

  • Logical European,

    Black Africans say they originated around the Nile. Anthropologist have found bones sub tropical features to prove this. When asked Modern day Egyptians where they originated, they say in Egypt. Straight nose and white skin are features indigenous of cold climate. The oldest bones with these features were found around Russia, not in Africa. It makes logical sense that cold-climate people migrated to Egypt.

  • Cro-magnon and Neanderthal skeletons (europoids) have been unearthed in lower Egypt and Kom OMbo. See the Kom Ombo man !!

  • yes I would not dout that because egypt has been invaded by whites, and of course as usual the whites stole/ I mean adapted to its black culture and way of life, blacks are not naturally racist, so they allowed them in there world. The first egyptians were blacks/africans, or what scholars would consider black/negroes feature that are use today in america, they would not say mixed. Where are the pyramids at in europe? I know there is 3 times more pyramids in nubia/sudan/cush  than egypt

  • Quel ramassis de conneries, ton pauvre message !

  • You are the stupidest wretch I've come across on the net and i can tell you there are millions of them on the web. You say you aren't racist but you say " white stole". It is as stupid if I said" blacks are cannibals". I agree that blacks aren't naturally racist but black fascists , like you , are ! The tiny Nubian pyramids were built 2500 years after the Egyptian ones in the Merotic period. Your definition of a black is "pyramid buider". Strnage and stupid !!

  • WHERE ARE THE PYRAMIDS IN EUROPE????? FIRST ledormant answer that with that logic......the first egyptians where black, we are in AFRICA NOT EUROPE, AND DON'T TRY AND ACT LIKE WHITES DID NOT COME OVER AND DESTROY, AND TAKE OVER OTHER NATIONS BY MURDER.WHITE PEOPLE HAVE PSYCHOLOGICAL BRAIN DAMAGE! ITS IN YOUR HISTORY BOOKS WRITTEN BY YOUR WHITE OWN, DON'T CALL ME RACIST IT WAS YOUR PEOPLE THAT HAVE PICTURES OF BLACKS BURNING AND HANGING ON POST CARDS, JIM CROW, 3/5 HUMAN LAWS, ALL DOCUMENTED

  • Yes, Egyptians were as black as the chocalate bar I've just had.

  • Egyptians were not black people. Just look at their arts, their portraits and their literature. They were not black and that's a fact. Why aren't they black today?

    Berbers in Northern Africa were also not black, and they live in Africa. They didn't came from the great empires of Mali or Songhay, they had lived in Northern Africa for millennia.

  • So what color where they? They look like modern day ethiopians, somolians,eretreans, they are black with fine features. One of the 6 different African features describes by white anthropologist. See africa is diverse unlike europeans, caucasians only have 1 distincted look, unless they have admixure. The Egytians you see white are not the original, I sure they blended in, I mean Egypt is in Africa, and besides there are no Pyramids in Europe, but you can find some in Nubia,China,and the Americas