That was moronic to watch. This is an example of natural selection in action, not evolution. Evolution is a religion peoples and if you don't wake up well be trapped in another dark age.
@DeadFishFactory your an evoloser who worships preists in white labcoats. Just because the TV says this is evolution doesn't make it true, but then again you were probably too dazzled by the suspensful music and special effects. If everybody was as stupid as you we would already be in another dark age.
@utubedetective72 This is why creationists are laughed at. They love to spout that evolution has no evidence, but when present with it, they deny everything and scream at the top of their lungs, "LALALALALA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU." Keep in mind, you fucking retard, that this is but one of the mountains of evidence for evolution.
I'm going to say that you're a troll. I refuse to believe that someone can be this stupid and breathe.
@DeadFishFactory i'm not presenting any evidence for creationism you idiot. I disagree with evolution on a conceptual level, in the same way you disagree with christianity. Of course I don't epect you to understand anything I just said because judging by your comments you must be aroung 11yrs old.
@SAGEBOT500 lol that statement is the epitomy of ignorance. Natural selection is an observable fact. As shown by the video, the environment will cause variation between two animals of the same species.
Evolution is the theory that all animals share a common relative. The vidoes example does not lead to this conclusion. Theories that are taken to be fact are dogmatic. If you cannot tell the difference between theory and fact than you are a religious sheep.
@utubedetective72 Natural selection and evolution are the same. If a species of animal is naturally selected for a particular trait everytime it favours their sustenance in a new environment or a new threat in the environment, over time the effects of natural selection will be big and you'll have no doubt evolution has taken place by then.
@KoreaRwkz Thanks for articulating the myth, like all evolosers you don't even understand the skeptic objection. Natural selection is observable i.e. the lizard above.
Evolution on the other hand is not observable it is based on faith. You are speculing that 'over time' something will happen which has not happened yet. Furthermore as you yourself stated you have 'no doubt', this by itself is very religious.
@KoreaRwkz Your right creation isn't observable it takes faith. Personally I believe in 7day creation because, as the story goes, God commanded Moses to keep the sabbath as a reminder that he is the creator. The bible has epic internal consistency.
I also believe in creation because if evolution was true its advocates would not have to lie all the time. The conclusion reached by the above vid is not uncommon and logical fallacy is the norm when it comes to evolutionary science
@utubedetective72 "The bible has consistency." Have you even read the bible lol.
Scientists have lied in the past (pigs tooth and pict man), not to dispose of creationism, but because they wanted to win pretigious awards and to go down in history. The truth in these cases you refer to, were uncovered by guess who.. "evolutionists" and scientists in the first place. Now you tell me why they would do such a thing when they want to lie? Have you ever found your own fossil and really looked at it?
@01101100d Lol that's a ridiculous question. Have you ever found a fossil and looked at it?
I don't really care about all the pig-man hoaxes our fathers were gullible enough to believe, thats all in the past although they are good examples of your kind lying. The above video is a lie. This is an example of natural selection. It is a lie to portrait every instance natural selection as evidence of evolution.
@utubedetective72 How can the above video not be an example of the process of evolution when the driving force, the engine of evolution is "natural selection." You really don't understand the subject well so why pretend you do?
Okay, lets take this from a different angle. Have you ever read up on the speciation of different types of yeast? Cichlids? Cabbages to cauliflower?
Now please answer my questions from my last 2 comments instead of replying with "it's all a conspiracy" tell me why?
@01101100d The natural selction is a plausible explanation for the process which causes evolution however evidence of natural selection does not equate with evidence for evolution. Evidence for speciation on the other hand is a different matter. I'll look into these plants and plants in general and get back to you in a couple days.
p.s pls learn to use quotations only to quote exact words, otherwise you just look foolish
@utubedetective72 Of course adaptation of species is proof for evolution. There are many more examples of speciation for me to provide than the 3 listed if you want them, but your research should link you to more examples.
The "it's a conspiracy" bit wasn't a quote, it was my take on your view from the impressions you've given me me.
@01101100d I looked into the examples you gave me. Yeast, cichlids and cabbages all come in different varieties and by your answers you seem to think every instance of variation is proof of evolution. If these examples show something novel, which I miised, please be specific.
How exaclty is it that 'adaption of a species is proof of evolution'? Please enlighten ne.
@utubedetective72 Of course they've come from another variety, such as humans came from one variety of apes, and that's part of the evolutionary theory isn't it. So why don't you tell me what the problem is with this concept.
Adaptation of a species is part of the whole processing of genetic change and diversity. Small changes at or below the species level is microevolution. With enough small changes or even one big change above the species level is macroevolution (speciation).
@01101100d Like you I used to believe the two concepts were the same. Intuatively it makes sense that all of animals are on a spectrum of diveristy and any variation is just evolution on a smaller scale. I get it. I've even written essays supporting the notion that all categories (kinds) are human constructs.
Since then I have looked at the actual evidence for this claim. There is lots of evidence that animals variate within a kind, but none that two kinds come from a single anscestor
@utubedetective72 I think what you want is to see two species diverge in front of your eyes, but that's not how it goes as i'm sure you know. I'm waiting for creationists to show me their god in making some animal appear out of nowhere in my living room, so they fail to prove the magic.
What about the fossil evidence though. There's countless fossils and intermediates of species in the fossil record, this was the first crucial piece of evidence in our thinking that showed creatures changed.
@01101100d thats exactly what I want to see. I want to see an experiment where scientists put a fish with only gills into an environment which causes it to evolve lungs and some legs. Or a rat experiment which causes them to grow wings like a bat. Thats evolution in action. If evolution was true these experiments would be possible correct?
Or does the process take too long? Ah long time, the dogmatic god of evolution.
@utubedetective72 The difference between our positions is that we "atheists" never claimed that evolution happens that fast, yet, the bible does state that everything was processed in a short space of time. Besides which you couldn't get a rat to become a bat, they only share a common ancestor that no longer exists.
How does the vast stretches of time come to make evolution a dogmatic belief?
@01101100d You are right time is the fundemental difference between evolution and creation. In order for evolution to be true you require vast stretches of time (magic)
e.g. according to evolution a rat should be able to turn into a gliding rat via natural selection. However because it takes so long such an experiment is not possible. Some may call this a convinient excuse I call it dogma.
@utubedetective72 You think time is a claim of magic lol. Sorry mate but that's quite an odd position, not because of the evidence for the fact that vast stretches of time have passed, but time exists itself and that from now till the future, there will come a point where billions of years will more pass.
No, evolution does NOT state that a rat SHOULD develop gliding skills. In my experience, i've never heard a scientist take such a position.
Time is not magic, nor a convenient excuse. Thanks
@01101100d obviously time is not magic, 'long time' is magic. We can both observe a minute, however we cannot observe a billion years.
You are a difficult sally, according to evolution a rat-like creature will turn into a bat-like creature given the right environment and enough time correct? If this experiment was conducted this would prove your theory, cept for the fact that it is impossible to conduct because of the magic ingrediant (a million yrs)
@utubedetective72 lol, no, not at all. Evolution could take a species down a number of routes, a route is never predetermined. Please give me the resources that makes you believe this to be the case.
Well it's funny how you try to assert that what we can't see or experience doesnt exist, especially when discussing on an invisible man. Billions of years can be easily measured. With enough minutes, you can still acquire billions of years.
@01101100d sorry mate I've had enough of this sillyness. If the environment is manipulated the inhabitants adapt in a manner correpoding to the manipulation. This is just environmental selection, plenty of experiments show this I don't understand why you are being difficult.
You cannot easly measure a billion years, in fact you cannot do it at all. If you really believe you can observe a biilion yrs than i'm done here. Go conduct your experiment and get back to me in a billion yrs time. bye
@utubedetective72 Me being silly, i think i've shown you plenty of patience here. Yes, the environment affects natural selection but selection is never predetermined, there are more than one solution to a common problem.
Billions of years are measured through radiometric dating, i'm not talking of personal experience lol. You're very misguided and lost in your understanding of what evolution is about. I suggest you get yourself onto a science course in higher education if you can.
@01101100d mate for all its worth I already have a stupid science degree. Psych major to be specific however a course in evolution was necessary (which I aced).
If you don't believe that manipulating the environment will lead to a predictable variation then you are one who does not understand natural selection. e.g. if I placed a population brown rabbits in the snow I can expect that they will turn white over time cos the darker rabibits will consistantly be hunted. Very simple stuff
@utubedetective72 Yeah sure. Now you've jumped back to micro evolution on your rabbits example and besides which there are hundreds of examples like that, something you should know from your degree that involves evolutionary studies which i don't think does somehow.
So, back to speciation and changes due to the environment. Ever heard of something called "convergent evolution." Where 2 distinct species find a common problem not inherited from one or another? Hope that serves a clue.
@utubedetective72 Comment 2. So by your idea that species are determined by a specific environment, then why would some species in an identical environment develop a different number of toes? When it's cold, some species insulate with blubber, others with fur, others with a combination of both, or even feathers. So, you see, you can get a multitude of solutions in one specific environment, that's why it's never pre determined because you don't know the course of evolution that'll unfold.
@01101100d Bro your talking complete nonsense. You cannot get a multitude of solutions from one specific environment if you are using one type of animal, typically the entire population will all adapt in the same way. If there is an example to the contrary be specific otherwise don't bother. Natural selection is the result of predictable variation and not random mutations, I assure you Dawkins himself would school you on this matter.
@utubedetective72 Evolution can be predictable but is not determined, in that one group may not develop the same result as another distinct group of the once same species, they can diverge. For example, the common ancestor between humans and chimps, one line took to bipedalism, the other took to knuckle walking.
Besides which you're being dishonest because your example was a rat in an undisclosed environment "SHOULD" grow the ability to fly or glide!! This is the assertion i'm challenging.
What I want to know is what is everyone deal with Christianity anyways? Christianity NEVER killed anyone, christian radicals who thought they knew everything did. Is it so hard to believe that a power far greater and beyond your understanding created all you see? Or at least had a hand in it? Is it so hard to believe that because He loved us so, he sent his one and only son so that we may be save? So what's the deal? Huh? Everyone thinks their so smart and so big by throwing big words around.
@hamboney9 You must have obviously blotted out the text "christian radicals who thought they knew everything did". Honestly, I am right with you and don;t approve of what happened in the crusades, but I'd appreciate it if you take the time to understand my point before making another.
@austinSN actually it has. some people choose not to take medicine in hopes of god saving them or choose not to be given care by a docter this happens more then you would think and if they were never tought about god they would have chosen the medical care over some beleif and lived
@filipinoatheist67 There is more ancient documentation for the new testament than there is ANY other ancient anything. Alexander the Greats bibliography is held to be accurate, even though it was written 800 years after his death! Skeptics criticize the accuracy of the bible saying "it was written way to long after his death to be accurate". Modern archeology and even SCIENCE has proven that the latest any New Testament scripture was put onto paper was about 20 years after his death.
@austinSN Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Jesus claimed to be a god, therefore text evidence isn't even remotely sufficient to prove his claim.
@gupsphoo So text isn't enough? So I guess with that theory, thousands of years of human history are just gone right? No man existed until writing was brought into place. So the greater part of the history Palestine, never happened I guess. Alexander the Great, never lived. Roman empire is just a myth. Ancient languages are the product of some happenstance writing. All Egyptian history is false. We might still be at war with Germany and Austria since the Treaty of Versailles is obviously false.
@gupsphoo If you want crazy proof about supernatural that is not necessarily about Jesus, read (If you can bear it) the story of "Sodom" in the bible. Today, this town is known to Archeology as "Bad-edh-dhra", an ancient city found that had burned from the top of the stone buildings, down.
@austinSN I'd give you extra credit if archeologists found evidence that the town that was supposed to be Sodom was destroyed by fire an brimstone. Good Luck!!!
Well since it seems i'm unable to post links in comments nor send you messages at all, I'll simply just tell you to look for "Sodom & Gomorrah Film" here on Youtube.
@gupsphoo You're still not even listening to a single thing I say. If you had read what I told you to, Sodom and Gomorrah were ancient cities that were destroyed by God's wrath by fire and brimstone(Sulfur) from the sky. Therefore the city that was made of stone was burned from the top down. The ruins of these cities have been found with remnants sulfur and ash and remains of ancient structures. If you could just take a second to think, you'd see what I'm saying, or just continue in ignorance.
@gupsphoo Before you go, you might want to explain how the Bible mentioning Sodom is somehow more credible than Spiderman mentioning New York. LOL!!!!
Wow. So the lizard learned how to defend against fire ants and has longer legs so it evolved? Show that the DNA did not already have a propensity for varying leg sizes. This is seriously the stupidest "evidence" for evolution that I have ever seen. It doesn't prove anything.
@hamberg42 It's right up there with the Italian Wall Lizard,there was no dna mapping done to verify the claim of cecal valves "evolving",of course there won't be,because they know if the dna was mapped,it would show identical in parent/offspring,with the only logical conclusion left being gene expression. But that just would'nt do would it?
@Copsweet No it certainly would not. As anyone with properly functioning brain can see that this so called "evolutionary theory" is entirely based on subjective data. It is not a valid science. Until this religion can prove objectively it's credibility (after almost 300 years it has failed to do so...) it will continue to be nothing more then the worship of the nature creation. Right up there with Satanist philosophy. Who do you think created this evolution "theory"? Even the name is deceiving.
"Either a fucking moron, or a clever troll...." - How can we refute such evidence as this which is in support of evolutionary "theory"? Your words are perplexing!
Err... what I really mean to say is that you are a fucking moron bro.
@hamberg42 quick biology lesson we have the genes they just need unlocked and eventually all with the less effective genes die off leaving only the ones who used the supperior gene so yes using the longer legs gene is evolving if more are appearing with the longer legs and genes can mutate making some new looking creature and if the mutation was a good one then eventually thousands of years depending on the breeding cycle the creature will be the regular and the old one could be extinct
@Parasite10000000 You know a house is build because you have seen one build before and can reference that memory, you have not seen a universe built. Your whole chance argument is also non-sense, it would be like buying a lotto ticket then saying look at the chances of me getting these numbers! It's super small, your right, but you had to get something. Saying were to stupid to understand the universe is also void because ignorance is proof of nothing other then your unwillingness to learn
Same thing has happened with hedgehogs in the UK. Their natural instinct is to curl up in the face of danger, great against foxes, but rubbish against traffic. In areas with heavy traffic they no longer roll up, but walk out of danger as best they can.
Do not be afraid, this does not prove God does not exist. It proves he/she/it does.
To the Atheist, please, show little more respect to your brothers and sisters. Whilst you may have grounds that make your argument superior, your actions and thirst for argument quickly bring you down to their level.
@01101100d you idiot, the above vid doesn't prove that the process of evoution can occur. It just shows that lizard is adapted to its environment. You people need to stop sugar-coating things so much
@OldaurGold (comment 2) By that comment, it's not hard to tell that you're a creationist. Like more than most creationists, you have a very narrow understanding of what evolution and its mechanism is. You said yourself that the video "just shows that lizard is adapted to its environment." Mate, that's what evolution is about.
If you have any questions just throw them my way, i'll be happy to answer.
@01101100d of course I know what evolution is. But that doesn't mean that I have to believe in it. It contradicts my beliefs but I still understand what thesse evolutionists are trying to get at. According to their "scientific" model, mutations occur, most mutations lead to lethality, a few produce advantageous, natural selection acts on phenotype, traits that will help the organism to survive in a given environment will likely survive and more offspring is produced. But this model is stupid
@OldaurGold Okay, you explained the basics, but do you understand it? Otherwise, how can you say it's a stupid model when we observe it in nature. The idea of natural selection isn't hard to see, nor is it hard to grasp. I think maybe you do understand it, but you're afraid to take it on because as you admitted yourself "It contradicts my beliefs." Your belief in your God is only that, a belief. To block out reality for a nappy wearing belief is an insult to your own intelligence sir/madam.
These "small things" are actually critical factors in the survival of a species, and we have records showing their previous transitional stages, so that takes care of that. Your entire comment is an example of affirming the consequent, when the history of life got here could have many more explanations than your own, so even if I had no evidence, we'd still be equally credible, but since you lack any proof that it happened how you believe, I can disregard anything you say.
You are setting up a straw man. I would like to respond by saying, yes, chance. In a universe with more 3x10²² stars, it's perfectly reasonable to assume that there is at least one planet that supports life. Your house was not built by chance, but it could have. If the universe is infinite, there is a 100% chance that a house identical to yours was built by chance. Things do not have to be likely to be possible. Part 1
Most other planets in the solar system can't support life because they lack a decent atmosphere that provides stable temperatures. Any life evolving would be frozen and baked frequently on any of the other rocky planets. It's all mostly chance anyway, life evolved on Earth because we are in Sol's HZ, and if it didn't we wouldn't be talking anyway. And if the earth was really "fine tuned," we wouldn't go through Ice Ages every 10K years...
@Unterschiedliche Did you watch the whole video? Yes, they adapted by changing their behavior. Then, they evolved longer legs to make their defensive twitch more effective.
@Hjernespreng So, when I start smoking cigarettes because every1 else around me does then I'm "evolving" and when I quit because they stopped, I'm also "evolving"?
@Unterschiedliche well, the lizards here are evolving longer legs, so if your son's, grandsons, etc. mouths take a shape that is better for smoking... then yeah, you are evolving.
Works like that with men too; the ones who stand their ground are more likely to meet an early grave while the ones who run from a fight live to procreate. The big difference is that human women want to breed with stupid & pass stupid along to their kids.
@ZombieSlaver let me guess Conservative , god fearing Christ loving good hearted christian. why is it when their faery tale is threatened the only recourse they have is threats, abuse, swearing and childish retorts? Oh yes because deep down they know how pathetic that myth really is an they are afraid to admit it. WWJD? NOTHING because he never existed. "thumb Whore" how quaint how.. christ like
You're so amusing... nice try, but you got it wrong. Not even sure how you could leap to "HE MUST BE A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN BECAUSE HE DOESN'T COPY OTHER PEOPLE LIKE I DO!" from my comment.
I'm atheist, and hate both main parties. I haven't resorted to threats, abuse, or childish retorts. Swearing, slightly. But swear words are merely words meant to intensify a statement, certainly nothing to be ashamed of.
"Evolution (also known as biological or organic evolution) is the change over time in one or more inherited traits found in populations of organisms. Inherited traits are particular distinguishing characteristics, including anatomical, biochemical or behavioral characteristics, that are passed on from one generation to the next."
Why do christian nuts like this asswipe below me come to view videos on evolution? Are you that unsure of yourself? If you believed without question or doubt you would not view this. Go pray to a wall.
@Copsweet Good your so smart and witty then please i beg you disprove this video...OH WAIT, you cant!! The same way we cant prove what we believe but we at least have facts to support our theory (unlike you). So please do yourself a favor and shut up. Based on your recent activity and judging from that i see you are here for exactly ONE reason (as i stated previously) because you are unsure. This makes sense and its challenging your little spoon fed religion based brain.
@Soulburner305m Atta boy,gobble it all up. Don't forget to hang your scepticism and critical thinking on the hook provided. Don't want it getting in the way do we? You guys are on total auto pilot,blabbing on about religion incessantly without offering scientific insight. Someone tells you a lizard "mutates"a twitching gene and you accept it withouy blinking. Lemming.
@Copsweet This isnt an insult at all but a serious question...are you mentally challenged? Read my initial statement, lets recap and ill go slow for you...im bad mouthing idiots like you that come here to evolution videos and you called me a evo clone, then i replied asking you for proof, then you call me a religion nut? LMFAO! Your either a retarded goth kid that think both sides are conformists, a religion nut, or just a nut. Pick one, and btw asshole I have a biochem degree.
@Copsweet evo-clone, lemming, im on a hook? Geez you must really have it all together, im jealous you have all the answers. I at least respect other peoples opinions.... according to you everyone is a "lemming" (really original btw, you should write for snl) but apart from that i was making an observation asking why people come to videos they are obviously against and it was geared at no specific person and you with the brain of a peon fire off at me and your argument makes no sense.
@Soulburner305 My mistake,I did'nt realize "christian nuts and asswipe" was either respectfull or original. I have the utmost respect for peoples opinions. And yes,you continue to babble on about religion,did'nt say you were a religious nut,there is a marked difference.
Let me wrap this up for you once at for all, im not going to reply anymore. Funny name, you like cops? I used to be one, i quit because i was working with IDIOTS!!!! I was also in the army special ops and served overseas, i have brains and bronze i can wax intellectual all day long big guy, im dumbing it down for people with obvious mental defects such as yourself, now please stop embarrassing yourself by answering back. Good luck with life because i know it must be hard for someone like you.
I don't see how in the 21st century there is still any debate to the validity of evolution in any form. If you are not afraid of the truth (assuming you can read) a used biology textbook can be bought for only a few dollars and it can provide all the proof you could ever want.
@bcw324 You're right, Bow. There is no debate, but the abject stupidity of these creationists sometimes gets the better of me and I end up getting into multi-page YT arguments. What angers me is that these people can forbid their children to learn biology, they can dominate school boards, and they generally convince people of lower intelligence that there really IS a debate out there. A poll showed 40% of Americans believe in Genesis over evolution! And they claim OTHER cultures are primitive?
@carmium You are indeed a boorish,bigoted narrow minded pratt are'nt you? I encourage(d) my kids to study biology,astronomy & physics at College. I encourage them to be broad-minded,non-judgemental and empathetic to all. I taught them to look at all sides carefully before deciding on a path. You need to understand there is a broader range of people whom happen to believe in the existence of God than your perceived stereotypical Southern drawling fundamental. And I mean no offence to Southerners.
What a major crock of Evo Bandini Mountain BS. The older lizards have been living their lives having camouflaged successfully & that behavior has been conditioned into their stupid reptilian brains. Thus, even after absorbing a few ant bites within the minute, they think camouflage is still going to work as it has every single time it was employed (because they're still alive)
Young lizards haven't the conditioning experience & probably lacked the maturity to stand still. Of which, any Turkey
hunter can tell you that stillness is crucial when camouflaging. The young lizards twitched & found it worked. Thus, camouflaging doesn't become the standard M.O. Either way, its simply learned behavior that caused the change & not a retained mutation that enabled survival while the remainder of the population was killed off by environmental change
The theory is lame... "all of the normal individuals die, while a few reproduction defects survive". When do you ever see that anywhere?
@Chuichupachichi That is the beyond the most inaccurate description of evolution I have ever heard. I must admit, this video is a weak example of active evolution, but there are many others. Evolution works off of temporal and geographical isolation, natural, behavioral and sexual selection, and random genetic changes. No self respecting scientist has ever said "all of the normal individuals die, while a few reproduction defects survive" because it's simply not true. Evolution takes a long time.
{Evolution works off of temporal and geographical isolation, natural, behavioral and sexual selection, and random genetic changes}
The truth is that Evolution works off of as many words as Evolutionists can think up. That way when one explanation is refuted, you guys have another to fall back on. But because this process has been repeated so often is why now there exist nearly innumerable explanations for Evolution. Just 1 example - when Dawkins got stumped & when he had finally
taken enough time to think up another jungle book monkey tale & gave the ok to roll the camera again, he said; "fish are as modern as we are"??? Yet another morphological change to the ever evolving theory that is continually pardoned of its never ending unfalsifiable crime. If fish evolved into the first land organisms & the changes from Amphibians to human Mammals are astronomically numbered, then how are fish as modern as we are? Evolutionists simply fabricate whatever evidential mountain of
Bandini bullshit will conveniently provide an escape route whenever the theory is falsified.
1) "It takes millions of years". Hey, we've discovered the Cambrian Explosion. "Oh thats ok, Evolution occurs through "punctuated equilibrium". 2) Tautology - The fossils show no transitionals. "Only illiterate Religotards use the word transitionals... nevertheless, you & I & all living organisms are intermediates... read a book, Sky-Daddy follower". Hey Tautovolutionist, how did you know I meant
intermediate? Proving Evo by predetermining that its fact & thereby determining that we're all intermediates, only proves the existence of Morpholobotomized Tautological Mutards. 3) With one missing link after another having been falsified, it suggests intentional fraudulence. "No, science (atheists) makes mistakes, but science (atheists) corrects itself. Besides, the world came to believe in Pig Tooth Man because Creationists caused that... learn logic, Bronze Age Book Reader"
The fact is that Evolution is undeniably asserted to be purely a biological reproductive process... "slow, incremental change over time". Theoretically, this must entail the retention of mutations from the few individuals that survived while the remaining population died. To put it to you in Evolutionist's terms; "your argument is inconsistent with this explanation. Thus, it proves you don't understand"... your own gig
Evotautolution in a nutshell - "the individuals of a population that are most fit (identified as those having most offspring) will have the most offspring".
Ironically, secularists/atheists subscribe to minimal reproduction due to supposed overpopulation, while reviling the reproductively proficient religious
If you liked that, I would assume that you would much better enjoy my video titled; "Evolutionists Supplication For Speciation"... my own personal literary masterpiece
ha ha ha, its no wonder that you Evoists are so easily fooled by false science. Regarding the "individuals that are most fit" quote, you simply carried on & continued with its premise by appending more postulations to it. That indicates that you are in agreement with the tautological quote by having incorporated it into your explanation. The reason I posted it was so that you can see the obvious tautology in Evo theory & you see nothing wrong with it....Typical Evolutionist Airhead
There are many individual items that alone kill Evolution & Entropy is one of them. Everyone agrees that the universe & everything in it is headed towards "heat death", due to Entropy. Thus, Cosmological Evolution could have never occurred because that would be diametrically opposed to the reality of the Entropic effect imposed upon the universe. Without Cosmo Evo. its implausible for Abiogenesis to occur. In turn, without Abiogenesis, Biological Evo can't occur either
@Chuichupachichi I love how you fake up your sentences to look like scientific observations: "Everyone agrees that the universe & everything in it is headed towards "heat death".", and how you think you understand even more than what the theory of evolution has an explanation about, with even cosmology involved: You are such a honest and religiously unbiased genious!
{I love how you fake up your sentences to look like scientific observations and how you think you understand even more than what the theory of evolution has an explanation about}
Well... do you suppose that since you know so much about real science, that some day you might come back & present it to the world in the form of a legitimate argument that actually addresses my points & explains the basis for your assertions
@Chuichupachichi Present your theory to peer reviews then! Might be funny...Personally, I am not immodest enough to have a personal theory, but I trust ways more people who dedicate their life to understanding and dare to confront their theories in the most harsh way.
@fashionhistorylover Academic SCIENCE organizations are indeed biased toward science: Repeatible experiences, no factors like " I believe that..." (definition of faith), theories that might be true unless ONE observable fact contradicts them: Too '"liberal" for you indeed.
@wollin20 They do not care if someone has evidence. A lot of scientists do not want to acknowledge creationism. There are professional people that have been disproving evolution for years.
@carmium Gravity can be accurately measured,tested,the effects acutely observed. Aircraft,spacecraft and fuel can be designed and built to exact tolerances based on gravity formulae. Evo has an unlimited supply of conjecture,speculation and extrapolation,nothing more. Wildly unlikely scenarios are presented then accepted as proof of occurence. The only thing gravity theory has in common with evo theory is they both incorporate the word theory.
@Copsweet I won't try to talk you out of your viewpoint, because , as someone said, there are none so blind as those who will not see. But you're entitled to your beliefs in a free country. It's just that sometimes I can't help getting angry at those who try - and even manage - to get evolution out of the biology classroom because of their adherence to a Bronze Age tale of magic. They don't believe in a flat Earth, stars on crystal spheres, or other biblical devices, but evolution? Oh, not that!
@carmium Never heard of anywhere that's had evo taken out of the classroom,not here at least. I would'nt advocate it either,as I believe both sides should be presented,not censorship. "Bronze age,flat Earth",c'mon,got any ideas of your own? You immediately conclude that someone like me is a blind follower,yet recite evo mantras that you've heard in the same breath. Do you realize the bible does not anywhere describe the Earth as flat?
Adaptation of Species is not Evolution! HUMANS adapt too!
Real "Evolution" in a nutshell is PHYSICAL CHANGE.
Know more: Evolution Explained Vip
or Visit Profile
SpiritWorldBlog 2 months ago
Actually Adaptive Behavior besides longer legs
taytech 3 months ago
It is inevitable, whether or not evolution existed in the past, it certainly does exist today.
OfolenWS 3 months ago
That was moronic to watch. This is an example of natural selection in action, not evolution. Evolution is a religion peoples and if you don't wake up well be trapped in another dark age.
utubedetective72 5 months ago
@utubedetective72 You're a fucking dumbass.
DeadFishFactory 5 months ago
@DeadFishFactory your an evoloser who worships preists in white labcoats. Just because the TV says this is evolution doesn't make it true, but then again you were probably too dazzled by the suspensful music and special effects. If everybody was as stupid as you we would already be in another dark age.
utubedetective72 5 months ago
@utubedetective72 This is why creationists are laughed at. They love to spout that evolution has no evidence, but when present with it, they deny everything and scream at the top of their lungs, "LALALALALA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU." Keep in mind, you fucking retard, that this is but one of the mountains of evidence for evolution.
I'm going to say that you're a troll. I refuse to believe that someone can be this stupid and breathe.
DeadFishFactory 5 months ago
@DeadFishFactory i'm not presenting any evidence for creationism you idiot. I disagree with evolution on a conceptual level, in the same way you disagree with christianity. Of course I don't epect you to understand anything I just said because judging by your comments you must be aroung 11yrs old.
utubedetective72 5 months ago
@utubedetective72 They're the same goddamn thing you idiot.
SAGEBOT500 4 months ago
@SAGEBOT500 lol that statement is the epitomy of ignorance. Natural selection is an observable fact. As shown by the video, the environment will cause variation between two animals of the same species.
Evolution is the theory that all animals share a common relative. The vidoes example does not lead to this conclusion. Theories that are taken to be fact are dogmatic. If you cannot tell the difference between theory and fact than you are a religious sheep.
utubedetective72 4 months ago
@utubedetective72 Natural selection and evolution are the same. If a species of animal is naturally selected for a particular trait everytime it favours their sustenance in a new environment or a new threat in the environment, over time the effects of natural selection will be big and you'll have no doubt evolution has taken place by then.
KoreaRwkz 2 months ago
@KoreaRwkz Thanks for articulating the myth, like all evolosers you don't even understand the skeptic objection. Natural selection is observable i.e. the lizard above.
Evolution on the other hand is not observable it is based on faith. You are speculing that 'over time' something will happen which has not happened yet. Furthermore as you yourself stated you have 'no doubt', this by itself is very religious.
Thats the difference
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 Fine. I get what you mean. But do you believe in creationism? Because creationism isn't observable either.
KoreaRwkz 2 months ago
@KoreaRwkz Your right creation isn't observable it takes faith. Personally I believe in 7day creation because, as the story goes, God commanded Moses to keep the sabbath as a reminder that he is the creator. The bible has epic internal consistency.
I also believe in creation because if evolution was true its advocates would not have to lie all the time. The conclusion reached by the above vid is not uncommon and logical fallacy is the norm when it comes to evolutionary science
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 "The bible has consistency." Have you even read the bible lol.
Scientists have lied in the past (pigs tooth and pict man), not to dispose of creationism, but because they wanted to win pretigious awards and to go down in history. The truth in these cases you refer to, were uncovered by guess who.. "evolutionists" and scientists in the first place. Now you tell me why they would do such a thing when they want to lie? Have you ever found your own fossil and really looked at it?
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d Lol that's a ridiculous question. Have you ever found a fossil and looked at it?
I don't really care about all the pig-man hoaxes our fathers were gullible enough to believe, thats all in the past although they are good examples of your kind lying. The above video is a lie. This is an example of natural selection. It is a lie to portrait every instance natural selection as evidence of evolution.
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 How can the above video not be an example of the process of evolution when the driving force, the engine of evolution is "natural selection." You really don't understand the subject well so why pretend you do?
Okay, lets take this from a different angle. Have you ever read up on the speciation of different types of yeast? Cichlids? Cabbages to cauliflower?
Now please answer my questions from my last 2 comments instead of replying with "it's all a conspiracy" tell me why?
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d The natural selction is a plausible explanation for the process which causes evolution however evidence of natural selection does not equate with evidence for evolution. Evidence for speciation on the other hand is a different matter. I'll look into these plants and plants in general and get back to you in a couple days.
p.s pls learn to use quotations only to quote exact words, otherwise you just look foolish
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 Of course adaptation of species is proof for evolution. There are many more examples of speciation for me to provide than the 3 listed if you want them, but your research should link you to more examples.
The "it's a conspiracy" bit wasn't a quote, it was my take on your view from the impressions you've given me me.
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d I looked into the examples you gave me. Yeast, cichlids and cabbages all come in different varieties and by your answers you seem to think every instance of variation is proof of evolution. If these examples show something novel, which I miised, please be specific.
How exaclty is it that 'adaption of a species is proof of evolution'? Please enlighten ne.
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 Of course they've come from another variety, such as humans came from one variety of apes, and that's part of the evolutionary theory isn't it. So why don't you tell me what the problem is with this concept.
Adaptation of a species is part of the whole processing of genetic change and diversity. Small changes at or below the species level is microevolution. With enough small changes or even one big change above the species level is macroevolution (speciation).
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d Like you I used to believe the two concepts were the same. Intuatively it makes sense that all of animals are on a spectrum of diveristy and any variation is just evolution on a smaller scale. I get it. I've even written essays supporting the notion that all categories (kinds) are human constructs.
Since then I have looked at the actual evidence for this claim. There is lots of evidence that animals variate within a kind, but none that two kinds come from a single anscestor
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 I think what you want is to see two species diverge in front of your eyes, but that's not how it goes as i'm sure you know. I'm waiting for creationists to show me their god in making some animal appear out of nowhere in my living room, so they fail to prove the magic.
What about the fossil evidence though. There's countless fossils and intermediates of species in the fossil record, this was the first crucial piece of evidence in our thinking that showed creatures changed.
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d thats exactly what I want to see. I want to see an experiment where scientists put a fish with only gills into an environment which causes it to evolve lungs and some legs. Or a rat experiment which causes them to grow wings like a bat. Thats evolution in action. If evolution was true these experiments would be possible correct?
Or does the process take too long? Ah long time, the dogmatic god of evolution.
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 The difference between our positions is that we "atheists" never claimed that evolution happens that fast, yet, the bible does state that everything was processed in a short space of time. Besides which you couldn't get a rat to become a bat, they only share a common ancestor that no longer exists.
How does the vast stretches of time come to make evolution a dogmatic belief?
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d You are right time is the fundemental difference between evolution and creation. In order for evolution to be true you require vast stretches of time (magic)
e.g. according to evolution a rat should be able to turn into a gliding rat via natural selection. However because it takes so long such an experiment is not possible. Some may call this a convinient excuse I call it dogma.
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 You think time is a claim of magic lol. Sorry mate but that's quite an odd position, not because of the evidence for the fact that vast stretches of time have passed, but time exists itself and that from now till the future, there will come a point where billions of years will more pass.
No, evolution does NOT state that a rat SHOULD develop gliding skills. In my experience, i've never heard a scientist take such a position.
Time is not magic, nor a convenient excuse. Thanks
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d obviously time is not magic, 'long time' is magic. We can both observe a minute, however we cannot observe a billion years.
You are a difficult sally, according to evolution a rat-like creature will turn into a bat-like creature given the right environment and enough time correct? If this experiment was conducted this would prove your theory, cept for the fact that it is impossible to conduct because of the magic ingrediant (a million yrs)
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 lol, no, not at all. Evolution could take a species down a number of routes, a route is never predetermined. Please give me the resources that makes you believe this to be the case.
Well it's funny how you try to assert that what we can't see or experience doesnt exist, especially when discussing on an invisible man. Billions of years can be easily measured. With enough minutes, you can still acquire billions of years.
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d sorry mate I've had enough of this sillyness. If the environment is manipulated the inhabitants adapt in a manner correpoding to the manipulation. This is just environmental selection, plenty of experiments show this I don't understand why you are being difficult.
You cannot easly measure a billion years, in fact you cannot do it at all. If you really believe you can observe a biilion yrs than i'm done here. Go conduct your experiment and get back to me in a billion yrs time. bye
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 Me being silly, i think i've shown you plenty of patience here. Yes, the environment affects natural selection but selection is never predetermined, there are more than one solution to a common problem.
Billions of years are measured through radiometric dating, i'm not talking of personal experience lol. You're very misguided and lost in your understanding of what evolution is about. I suggest you get yourself onto a science course in higher education if you can.
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d mate for all its worth I already have a stupid science degree. Psych major to be specific however a course in evolution was necessary (which I aced).
If you don't believe that manipulating the environment will lead to a predictable variation then you are one who does not understand natural selection. e.g. if I placed a population brown rabbits in the snow I can expect that they will turn white over time cos the darker rabibits will consistantly be hunted. Very simple stuff
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 Yeah sure. Now you've jumped back to micro evolution on your rabbits example and besides which there are hundreds of examples like that, something you should know from your degree that involves evolutionary studies which i don't think does somehow.
So, back to speciation and changes due to the environment. Ever heard of something called "convergent evolution." Where 2 distinct species find a common problem not inherited from one or another? Hope that serves a clue.
01101100d 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 Comment 2. So by your idea that species are determined by a specific environment, then why would some species in an identical environment develop a different number of toes? When it's cold, some species insulate with blubber, others with fur, others with a combination of both, or even feathers. So, you see, you can get a multitude of solutions in one specific environment, that's why it's never pre determined because you don't know the course of evolution that'll unfold.
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d Bro your talking complete nonsense. You cannot get a multitude of solutions from one specific environment if you are using one type of animal, typically the entire population will all adapt in the same way. If there is an example to the contrary be specific otherwise don't bother. Natural selection is the result of predictable variation and not random mutations, I assure you Dawkins himself would school you on this matter.
utubedetective72 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 Evolution can be predictable but is not determined, in that one group may not develop the same result as another distinct group of the once same species, they can diverge. For example, the common ancestor between humans and chimps, one line took to bipedalism, the other took to knuckle walking.
Besides which you're being dishonest because your example was a rat in an undisclosed environment "SHOULD" grow the ability to fly or glide!! This is the assertion i'm challenging.
01101100d 2 months ago
@utubedetective72 Amen
CatSpiritOfChaos 1 week ago
this just goes to show u that whatever HAPPENS to work, gets passed on to the next generations.
itzahazylife 5 months ago
Does this mean some behaviors are genetic?
bbeach1 6 months ago
Interesting
ridewave444 6 months ago
What I want to know is what is everyone deal with Christianity anyways? Christianity NEVER killed anyone, christian radicals who thought they knew everything did. Is it so hard to believe that a power far greater and beyond your understanding created all you see? Or at least had a hand in it? Is it so hard to believe that because He loved us so, he sent his one and only son so that we may be save? So what's the deal? Huh? Everyone thinks their so smart and so big by throwing big words around.
austinSN 7 months ago
@austinSN Yes it is.
Thedbelisario96 7 months ago 3
@austinSN actually it killed hundreds dont you remember those crusades?
open your history book once and a while,hmmm
hamboney9 6 months ago
@hamboney9 You must have obviously blotted out the text "christian radicals who thought they knew everything did". Honestly, I am right with you and don;t approve of what happened in the crusades, but I'd appreciate it if you take the time to understand my point before making another.
austinSN 6 months ago
@austinSN oh i understand.I just completely disagree.
hamboney9 6 months ago
@austinSN actually it has. some people choose not to take medicine in hopes of god saving them or choose not to be given care by a docter this happens more then you would think and if they were never tought about god they would have chosen the medical care over some beleif and lived
WESSLYJ 6 months ago
@austinSN he sent his only son on a suicide mission knowing he will be "resurrected" later..full of crap this biblical fictions..
filipinoatheist67 5 months ago
@filipinoatheist67 There is more ancient documentation for the new testament than there is ANY other ancient anything. Alexander the Greats bibliography is held to be accurate, even though it was written 800 years after his death! Skeptics criticize the accuracy of the bible saying "it was written way to long after his death to be accurate". Modern archeology and even SCIENCE has proven that the latest any New Testament scripture was put onto paper was about 20 years after his death.
austinSN 5 months ago
@austinSN Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Jesus claimed to be a god, therefore text evidence isn't even remotely sufficient to prove his claim.
gupsphoo 5 months ago
@gupsphoo So text isn't enough? So I guess with that theory, thousands of years of human history are just gone right? No man existed until writing was brought into place. So the greater part of the history Palestine, never happened I guess. Alexander the Great, never lived. Roman empire is just a myth. Ancient languages are the product of some happenstance writing. All Egyptian history is false. We might still be at war with Germany and Austria since the Treaty of Versailles is obviously false.
austinSN 5 months ago
Comment removed
gupsphoo 5 months ago
@austinSN None of the examples you cited makes supernatural claims like the Bible does. Try again.
gupsphoo 5 months ago
@gupsphoo If you want crazy proof about supernatural that is not necessarily about Jesus, read (If you can bear it) the story of "Sodom" in the bible. Today, this town is known to Archeology as "Bad-edh-dhra", an ancient city found that had burned from the top of the stone buildings, down.
austinSN 5 months ago
@austinSN Oh my! By your logic, Spiderman must be real because the Spiderman comic mentions New York!
Try thinking for a change!
gupsphoo 5 months ago
@gupsphoo Wow man, nice. I think we're done here. I have better things to do than argue with the deaf.
austinSN 5 months ago
@austinSN I'd give you extra credit if archeologists found evidence that the town that was supposed to be Sodom was destroyed by fire an brimstone. Good Luck!!!
gupsphoo 4 months ago
@gupsphoo
Well since it seems i'm unable to post links in comments nor send you messages at all, I'll simply just tell you to look for "Sodom & Gomorrah Film" here on Youtube.
austinSN 4 months ago
@austinSN Have you ever visited New York? If you did, you'd know Spiderman is as real as your god, according to your line of reasoning.
gupsphoo 4 months ago 2
@gupsphoo You're still not even listening to a single thing I say. If you had read what I told you to, Sodom and Gomorrah were ancient cities that were destroyed by God's wrath by fire and brimstone(Sulfur) from the sky. Therefore the city that was made of stone was burned from the top down. The ruins of these cities have been found with remnants sulfur and ash and remains of ancient structures. If you could just take a second to think, you'd see what I'm saying, or just continue in ignorance.
austinSN 4 months ago
@gupsphoo Before you go, you might want to explain how the Bible mentioning Sodom is somehow more credible than Spiderman mentioning New York. LOL!!!!
gupsphoo 4 months ago
The Declaration of Independence, nope. Heck, what about your high school diploma? Hmmmm... Keeps a man up at night it does.
austinSN 5 months ago
@filipinoatheist67 Besides, what does that have ANYTHING to do with my original statement?
austinSN 5 months ago
@AvaterPrinceZuko Even top science TODAY is proving that God and evolution go together like peas and carrots.
austinSN 7 months ago
Wow. So the lizard learned how to defend against fire ants and has longer legs so it evolved? Show that the DNA did not already have a propensity for varying leg sizes. This is seriously the stupidest "evidence" for evolution that I have ever seen. It doesn't prove anything.
hamberg42 7 months ago
@hamberg42 It's right up there with the Italian Wall Lizard,there was no dna mapping done to verify the claim of cecal valves "evolving",of course there won't be,because they know if the dna was mapped,it would show identical in parent/offspring,with the only logical conclusion left being gene expression. But that just would'nt do would it?
Copsweet 7 months ago
@Copsweet No it certainly would not. As anyone with properly functioning brain can see that this so called "evolutionary theory" is entirely based on subjective data. It is not a valid science. Until this religion can prove objectively it's credibility (after almost 300 years it has failed to do so...) it will continue to be nothing more then the worship of the nature creation. Right up there with Satanist philosophy. Who do you think created this evolution "theory"? Even the name is deceiving.
hamberg42 7 months ago
@hamberg42 "Until this religion can prove objectively it's credibility..." Either a fucking moron, or a clever troll....
zzzIdividedbyzerozzz 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz
"Either a fucking moron, or a clever troll...." - How can we refute such evidence as this which is in support of evolutionary "theory"? Your words are perplexing!
Err... what I really mean to say is that you are a fucking moron bro.
hamberg42 7 months ago
@hamberg42 quick biology lesson we have the genes they just need unlocked and eventually all with the less effective genes die off leaving only the ones who used the supperior gene so yes using the longer legs gene is evolving if more are appearing with the longer legs and genes can mutate making some new looking creature and if the mutation was a good one then eventually thousands of years depending on the breeding cycle the creature will be the regular and the old one could be extinct
WESSLYJ 6 months ago
@Parasite10000000 You know a house is build because you have seen one build before and can reference that memory, you have not seen a universe built. Your whole chance argument is also non-sense, it would be like buying a lotto ticket then saying look at the chances of me getting these numbers! It's super small, your right, but you had to get something. Saying were to stupid to understand the universe is also void because ignorance is proof of nothing other then your unwillingness to learn
mikepike25 7 months ago 2
Same thing has happened with hedgehogs in the UK. Their natural instinct is to curl up in the face of danger, great against foxes, but rubbish against traffic. In areas with heavy traffic they no longer roll up, but walk out of danger as best they can.
MrJoebauwens 7 months ago
Isn't watching anything watching evolution in action?
851852093114208513 8 months ago
This is to the religious.
Do not be afraid, this does not prove God does not exist. It proves he/she/it does.
To the Atheist, please, show little more respect to your brothers and sisters. Whilst you may have grounds that make your argument superior, your actions and thirst for argument quickly bring you down to their level.
DarkArtistKaiser 8 months ago 2
Creationists got pwned for the millionth time and still dont get it.
01101100d 8 months ago 6
@01101100d you idiot, the above vid doesn't prove that the process of evoution can occur. It just shows that lizard is adapted to its environment. You people need to stop sugar-coating things so much
OldaurGold 2 months ago
@OldaurGold Evolution IS about adapting to your environment, so therefore it is an example. Fuck sakes lol.
01101100d 2 months ago
@OldaurGold (comment 2) By that comment, it's not hard to tell that you're a creationist. Like more than most creationists, you have a very narrow understanding of what evolution and its mechanism is. You said yourself that the video "just shows that lizard is adapted to its environment." Mate, that's what evolution is about.
If you have any questions just throw them my way, i'll be happy to answer.
01101100d 2 months ago
@01101100d of course I know what evolution is. But that doesn't mean that I have to believe in it. It contradicts my beliefs but I still understand what thesse evolutionists are trying to get at. According to their "scientific" model, mutations occur, most mutations lead to lethality, a few produce advantageous, natural selection acts on phenotype, traits that will help the organism to survive in a given environment will likely survive and more offspring is produced. But this model is stupid
OldaurGold 2 months ago
@OldaurGold Okay, you explained the basics, but do you understand it? Otherwise, how can you say it's a stupid model when we observe it in nature. The idea of natural selection isn't hard to see, nor is it hard to grasp. I think maybe you do understand it, but you're afraid to take it on because as you admitted yourself "It contradicts my beliefs." Your belief in your God is only that, a belief. To block out reality for a nappy wearing belief is an insult to your own intelligence sir/madam.
01101100d 2 months ago
@Parasite10000000
P2
These "small things" are actually critical factors in the survival of a species, and we have records showing their previous transitional stages, so that takes care of that. Your entire comment is an example of affirming the consequent, when the history of life got here could have many more explanations than your own, so even if I had no evidence, we'd still be equally credible, but since you lack any proof that it happened how you believe, I can disregard anything you say.
Soder96 8 months ago
@Parasite10000000
You are setting up a straw man. I would like to respond by saying, yes, chance. In a universe with more 3x10²² stars, it's perfectly reasonable to assume that there is at least one planet that supports life. Your house was not built by chance, but it could have. If the universe is infinite, there is a 100% chance that a house identical to yours was built by chance. Things do not have to be likely to be possible. Part 1
Soder96 8 months ago
@Parasite10000000
Most other planets in the solar system can't support life because they lack a decent atmosphere that provides stable temperatures. Any life evolving would be frozen and baked frequently on any of the other rocky planets. It's all mostly chance anyway, life evolved on Earth because we are in Sol's HZ, and if it didn't we wouldn't be talking anyway. And if the earth was really "fine tuned," we wouldn't go through Ice Ages every 10K years...
Soder96 8 months ago
So basicly, retarded ones just are "HERP A DURR MAYBEH IF AI PLA DEAD THEY GEHT OFF OV MAH" (DIE)
Smart Ones Are "GTFO" (ALIVE)
keggie09 8 months ago 2
Lizards are so cute!
BorrahAlive 8 months ago
1:33 Like a boss.
statusisaway 8 months ago
When in doubt..... Twitch like a lizard.
KSchlgl 8 months ago 2
how can Christian morons watch stuff like this and still claim evolution is wrong!!!
needabloodyname 8 months ago
I love the soft porn music in the background. It makes the lizards' dance the dance of lov-OHGODANTSGET'EMOFFME!
mandydax 8 months ago
fucking ants! i hate ants! FUCK ANTS
BlackandBlueMage 8 months ago
@BlackandBlueMage haha, i don't know why that made me laugh so hard, thanks.
blakscull 8 months ago
ADAPTING isn't freaking evolving .. Idiots
Unterschiedliche 8 months ago
@Unterschiedliche Did you watch the whole video? Yes, they adapted by changing their behavior. Then, they evolved longer legs to make their defensive twitch more effective.
renkinjutsu01 8 months ago
@Unterschiedliche
Uh, yes, adapting is evolving. Behavioral adaptation is a part of Evolution.
It is the same stuff that makes birds fly southwards when it is cold.
Hjernespreng 8 months ago
@Hjernespreng So, when I start smoking cigarettes because every1 else around me does then I'm "evolving" and when I quit because they stopped, I'm also "evolving"?
Unterschiedliche 8 months ago
@Unterschiedliche
Invalid comparison. And what you are talking about there is just pack behavior.
Hjernespreng 8 months ago
@Unterschiedliche well, the lizards here are evolving longer legs, so if your son's, grandsons, etc. mouths take a shape that is better for smoking... then yeah, you are evolving.
blakscull 8 months ago
If DNA is acid and it's in every cell then why don't we just all dissolve? Your move evolution
MasterTenku 8 months ago
@MasterTenku LMAO
Wow, that bit of POE made my day, thanks.
luisdez81 4 months ago
WHERE'S YOUR GOD NOW?!?
StackCityEntOfficial 8 months ago
@StackCityEntOfficial
Shes there all the way.
DarkArtistKaiser 8 months ago
I like how at the end there was a disclaimer about lizards not being harmed, but no disclaimer about ants not being harmed...
flamingspinach 8 months ago 2
My fence lizards dances when it doesn't want to be picked up. X'D
loboluver1155w 8 months ago
Works like that with men too; the ones who stand their ground are more likely to meet an early grave while the ones who run from a fight live to procreate. The big difference is that human women want to breed with stupid & pass stupid along to their kids.
LikaLaruku 8 months ago
What's up with the porn music?
PickleIslandLmtd 8 months ago
Lol.. did anyone else laughing when the announcer said twitcher? Cause straight away I thought of zombies from dawn of the dead!
TheNahTano 8 months ago
46 people will not face facts
eahazell 8 months ago
@eahazell
And you are a pathetic thumb whore.
ZombieSlaver 8 months ago
@ZombieSlaver let me guess Conservative , god fearing Christ loving good hearted christian. why is it when their faery tale is threatened the only recourse they have is threats, abuse, swearing and childish retorts? Oh yes because deep down they know how pathetic that myth really is an they are afraid to admit it. WWJD? NOTHING because he never existed. "thumb Whore" how quaint how.. christ like
eahazell 8 months ago
@eahazell
LOLOLOL
You're so amusing... nice try, but you got it wrong. Not even sure how you could leap to "HE MUST BE A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN BECAUSE HE DOESN'T COPY OTHER PEOPLE LIKE I DO!" from my comment.
I'm atheist, and hate both main parties. I haven't resorted to threats, abuse, or childish retorts. Swearing, slightly. But swear words are merely words meant to intensify a statement, certainly nothing to be ashamed of.
ZombieSlaver 8 months ago
Evolution, adaption, either way, this is just a example of Mothers picture painting itself. Quite fascinating.
DarkArtistKaiser 8 months ago
Juveniles!
7at2 8 months ago
Thanks Cracked.com. And those puns.
Klifster199 8 months ago 16
Cracked
UmbrellaToxic 8 months ago 3
TAKE THAT, CREATIONISM!
progrockcoffee 8 months ago 88
@progrockcoffee NUH UH GODDIDIT
Xerxes4242 4 months ago
This isn't evolution, it's adaptation. Discovery Channel should know the difference.
thejmfry 8 months ago
@thejmfry
"Evolution (also known as biological or organic evolution) is the change over time in one or more inherited traits found in populations of organisms. Inherited traits are particular distinguishing characteristics, including anatomical, biochemical or behavioral characteristics, that are passed on from one generation to the next."
Inherited anatomical - behavioral changes.
Weirdo10o4 8 months ago 2
@thejmfry
you're a moron. this is definitely evolution since this trait is being passed on from generation to generation. You should know the difference.
krnhorang85 8 months ago
@thejmfry this isn't hurr, it's durr
-u
drkraid 8 months ago
only the smart will continue
jjtheslayer69 9 months ago
So you're staying they're stupid
ACDCrocks051 9 months ago
AWESOME
hamsha27 9 months ago
wtf!
67bandit67 9 months ago
Why do christian nuts like this asswipe below me come to view videos on evolution? Are you that unsure of yourself? If you believed without question or doubt you would not view this. Go pray to a wall.
Soulburner305 9 months ago
Just keeping current with the latest bedtime story from the fable factory you evo-clones are swallowing as fact.
Copsweet 9 months ago
@Copsweet Good your so smart and witty then please i beg you disprove this video...OH WAIT, you cant!! The same way we cant prove what we believe but we at least have facts to support our theory (unlike you). So please do yourself a favor and shut up. Based on your recent activity and judging from that i see you are here for exactly ONE reason (as i stated previously) because you are unsure. This makes sense and its challenging your little spoon fed religion based brain.
Soulburner305 9 months ago
@Soulburner305m Atta boy,gobble it all up. Don't forget to hang your scepticism and critical thinking on the hook provided. Don't want it getting in the way do we? You guys are on total auto pilot,blabbing on about religion incessantly without offering scientific insight. Someone tells you a lizard "mutates"a twitching gene and you accept it withouy blinking. Lemming.
Copsweet 9 months ago
@Copsweet This isnt an insult at all but a serious question...are you mentally challenged? Read my initial statement, lets recap and ill go slow for you...im bad mouthing idiots like you that come here to evolution videos and you called me a evo clone, then i replied asking you for proof, then you call me a religion nut? LMFAO! Your either a retarded goth kid that think both sides are conformists, a religion nut, or just a nut. Pick one, and btw asshole I have a biochem degree.
Soulburner305 9 months ago
@Copsweet evo-clone, lemming, im on a hook? Geez you must really have it all together, im jealous you have all the answers. I at least respect other peoples opinions.... according to you everyone is a "lemming" (really original btw, you should write for snl) but apart from that i was making an observation asking why people come to videos they are obviously against and it was geared at no specific person and you with the brain of a peon fire off at me and your argument makes no sense.
Soulburner305 9 months ago
@Soulburner305 My mistake,I did'nt realize "christian nuts and asswipe" was either respectfull or original. I have the utmost respect for peoples opinions. And yes,you continue to babble on about religion,did'nt say you were a religious nut,there is a marked difference.
Copsweet 9 months ago
Let me wrap this up for you once at for all, im not going to reply anymore. Funny name, you like cops? I used to be one, i quit because i was working with IDIOTS!!!! I was also in the army special ops and served overseas, i have brains and bronze i can wax intellectual all day long big guy, im dumbing it down for people with obvious mental defects such as yourself, now please stop embarrassing yourself by answering back. Good luck with life because i know it must be hard for someone like you.
Soulburner305 9 months ago
@Soulburner305 Oh yeah,you just ooze comprehension and insight.
Copsweet 9 months ago
@Soulburner305
You, sit down. Shut up. You can't win an argument with ad hominems. Let the adults talk.
Soder96 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Soder96 "You, sit down. Shut up. You can't win an argument with ad hominems. Let the adults talk."
I find this quite ironic.
luisdez81 4 months ago
how did the eye evolve? ;) answer that one
angeliclight11 10 months ago
@angeliclight11 how about you look it up yourself? the answers been there for a REALLY long time.
PachikaInTheFagBox 8 months ago
but it's still a lizard, lol, jk
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 10 months ago
It is the religious people who needs to proove that their religion is true and that they have the evidence to proove it.
lordp3master 10 months ago 4
@lordp3master
Why do I need to? Would you actually be convinced any more or less if they had proof, even if it has merit?
Well either way, by watching this video, you see my proof to my faith. Mothers painting paints itself. Evolution is one of the methods how.
DarkArtistKaiser 8 months ago
Yay for evolution!
1000OceansWide 10 months ago
stop with the long messages already -_-
Darktail11 11 months ago
I don't see how in the 21st century there is still any debate to the validity of evolution in any form. If you are not afraid of the truth (assuming you can read) a used biology textbook can be bought for only a few dollars and it can provide all the proof you could ever want.
bcw324 11 months ago
@bcw324 You're right, Bow. There is no debate, but the abject stupidity of these creationists sometimes gets the better of me and I end up getting into multi-page YT arguments. What angers me is that these people can forbid their children to learn biology, they can dominate school boards, and they generally convince people of lower intelligence that there really IS a debate out there. A poll showed 40% of Americans believe in Genesis over evolution! And they claim OTHER cultures are primitive?
carmium 11 months ago
@carmium You are indeed a boorish,bigoted narrow minded pratt are'nt you? I encourage(d) my kids to study biology,astronomy & physics at College. I encourage them to be broad-minded,non-judgemental and empathetic to all. I taught them to look at all sides carefully before deciding on a path. You need to understand there is a broader range of people whom happen to believe in the existence of God than your perceived stereotypical Southern drawling fundamental. And I mean no offence to Southerners.
Copsweet 11 months ago
What a major crock of Evo Bandini Mountain BS. The older lizards have been living their lives having camouflaged successfully & that behavior has been conditioned into their stupid reptilian brains. Thus, even after absorbing a few ant bites within the minute, they think camouflage is still going to work as it has every single time it was employed (because they're still alive)
Young lizards haven't the conditioning experience & probably lacked the maturity to stand still. Of which, any Turkey
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi
Except that the twitching lizards have longer legs than the non-twitchers. Odd, huh?
Soder96 8 months ago
hunter can tell you that stillness is crucial when camouflaging. The young lizards twitched & found it worked. Thus, camouflaging doesn't become the standard M.O. Either way, its simply learned behavior that caused the change & not a retained mutation that enabled survival while the remainder of the population was killed off by environmental change
The theory is lame... "all of the normal individuals die, while a few reproduction defects survive". When do you ever see that anywhere?
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi That is the beyond the most inaccurate description of evolution I have ever heard. I must admit, this video is a weak example of active evolution, but there are many others. Evolution works off of temporal and geographical isolation, natural, behavioral and sexual selection, and random genetic changes. No self respecting scientist has ever said "all of the normal individuals die, while a few reproduction defects survive" because it's simply not true. Evolution takes a long time.
sillymonkey829 1 year ago
@sillymonkey829
{Evolution works off of temporal and geographical isolation, natural, behavioral and sexual selection, and random genetic changes}
The truth is that Evolution works off of as many words as Evolutionists can think up. That way when one explanation is refuted, you guys have another to fall back on. But because this process has been repeated so often is why now there exist nearly innumerable explanations for Evolution. Just 1 example - when Dawkins got stumped & when he had finally
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
taken enough time to think up another jungle book monkey tale & gave the ok to roll the camera again, he said; "fish are as modern as we are"??? Yet another morphological change to the ever evolving theory that is continually pardoned of its never ending unfalsifiable crime. If fish evolved into the first land organisms & the changes from Amphibians to human Mammals are astronomically numbered, then how are fish as modern as we are? Evolutionists simply fabricate whatever evidential mountain of
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Bandini bullshit will conveniently provide an escape route whenever the theory is falsified.
1) "It takes millions of years". Hey, we've discovered the Cambrian Explosion. "Oh thats ok, Evolution occurs through "punctuated equilibrium". 2) Tautology - The fossils show no transitionals. "Only illiterate Religotards use the word transitionals... nevertheless, you & I & all living organisms are intermediates... read a book, Sky-Daddy follower". Hey Tautovolutionist, how did you know I meant
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
intermediate? Proving Evo by predetermining that its fact & thereby determining that we're all intermediates, only proves the existence of Morpholobotomized Tautological Mutards. 3) With one missing link after another having been falsified, it suggests intentional fraudulence. "No, science (atheists) makes mistakes, but science (atheists) corrects itself. Besides, the world came to believe in Pig Tooth Man because Creationists caused that... learn logic, Bronze Age Book Reader"
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
The fact is that Evolution is undeniably asserted to be purely a biological reproductive process... "slow, incremental change over time". Theoretically, this must entail the retention of mutations from the few individuals that survived while the remaining population died. To put it to you in Evolutionist's terms; "your argument is inconsistent with this explanation. Thus, it proves you don't understand"... your own gig
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
Evotautolution in a nutshell - "the individuals of a population that are most fit (identified as those having most offspring) will have the most offspring".
Ironically, secularists/atheists subscribe to minimal reproduction due to supposed overpopulation, while reviling the reproductively proficient religious
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi I have to say,that is the most eloquent,accurate and insightful description of evolution and its faithfull I've seen yet.
Copsweet 1 year ago
@Copsweet
Well thank you much, I do appreciate that.
If you liked that, I would assume that you would much better enjoy my video titled; "Evolutionists Supplication For Speciation"... my own personal literary masterpiece
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi
"the individuals of a population that are most fit (identified as those having most offspring) will have the most offspring"
... And manage to pass their genes to the next generation, so on so forth, until it becomes the norm in the population.
I watched a couple of your videos. You seem to be able to make quick assertions simply by looking at things. Not investigating.
justforflag2 1 year ago
@justforflag2
ha ha ha, its no wonder that you Evoists are so easily fooled by false science. Regarding the "individuals that are most fit" quote, you simply carried on & continued with its premise by appending more postulations to it. That indicates that you are in agreement with the tautological quote by having incorporated it into your explanation. The reason I posted it was so that you can see the obvious tautology in Evo theory & you see nothing wrong with it....Typical Evolutionist Airhead
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi So your explanation is what, apart from "God did it"?
wollin20 1 year ago
@wollin20
There are many individual items that alone kill Evolution & Entropy is one of them. Everyone agrees that the universe & everything in it is headed towards "heat death", due to Entropy. Thus, Cosmological Evolution could have never occurred because that would be diametrically opposed to the reality of the Entropic effect imposed upon the universe. Without Cosmo Evo. its implausible for Abiogenesis to occur. In turn, without Abiogenesis, Biological Evo can't occur either
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi I love how you fake up your sentences to look like scientific observations: "Everyone agrees that the universe & everything in it is headed towards "heat death".", and how you think you understand even more than what the theory of evolution has an explanation about, with even cosmology involved: You are such a honest and religiously unbiased genious!
wollin20 1 year ago
@wollin20
{I love how you fake up your sentences to look like scientific observations and how you think you understand even more than what the theory of evolution has an explanation about}
Well... do you suppose that since you know so much about real science, that some day you might come back & present it to the world in the form of a legitimate argument that actually addresses my points & explains the basis for your assertions
Chuichupachichi 1 year ago
@Chuichupachichi Present your theory to peer reviews then! Might be funny...Personally, I am not immodest enough to have a personal theory, but I trust ways more people who dedicate their life to understanding and dare to confront their theories in the most harsh way.
wollin20 1 year ago
@wollin20 Most academic organizations are biased toward liberal beliefs. So they will not believe creationism anyway.
fashionhistorylover 1 year ago
@fashionhistorylover Academic SCIENCE organizations are indeed biased toward science: Repeatible experiences, no factors like " I believe that..." (definition of faith), theories that might be true unless ONE observable fact contradicts them: Too '"liberal" for you indeed.
wollin20 1 year ago
@wollin20 They do not care if someone has evidence. A lot of scientists do not want to acknowledge creationism. There are professional people that have been disproving evolution for years.
fashionhistorylover 1 year ago
@fashionhistorylover Untrue NO ONE has EVER disproved evolution. It would be like disproving gravity.
carmium 11 months ago
@carmium Gravity can be accurately measured,tested,the effects acutely observed. Aircraft,spacecraft and fuel can be designed and built to exact tolerances based on gravity formulae. Evo has an unlimited supply of conjecture,speculation and extrapolation,nothing more. Wildly unlikely scenarios are presented then accepted as proof of occurence. The only thing gravity theory has in common with evo theory is they both incorporate the word theory.
Copsweet 11 months ago
@Copsweet I won't try to talk you out of your viewpoint, because , as someone said, there are none so blind as those who will not see. But you're entitled to your beliefs in a free country. It's just that sometimes I can't help getting angry at those who try - and even manage - to get evolution out of the biology classroom because of their adherence to a Bronze Age tale of magic. They don't believe in a flat Earth, stars on crystal spheres, or other biblical devices, but evolution? Oh, not that!
carmium 11 months ago
@carmium Never heard of anywhere that's had evo taken out of the classroom,not here at least. I would'nt advocate it either,as I believe both sides should be presented,not censorship. "Bronze age,flat Earth",c'mon,got any ideas of your own? You immediately conclude that someone like me is a blind follower,yet recite evo mantras that you've heard in the same breath. Do you realize the bible does not anywhere describe the Earth as flat?
Copsweet 11 months ago