Well as far as Fannie and Freddie Mac both have had executives sued by the SEC for fraud related to subprime loans. These are the first charges brought against people connected to the financial collapse.
I watched your video and I really understand your frustration. If you want to make Bank of America pay for what they did to you, and thousands of others, you should watch this guy's video;
DEADLY BLOW ! TO Bank of America
You should contact this guy, he is really serious.
This woman is an inveterate liar. The Bush administration tried to reign in Fannie & Freddie and Democrats Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Maxine Waters blocked Republican efforts to regulate these government created corporations.
Of course David Shuster doesn't have the "stones" to ask tough questions like: "If that's the case and this is Bush's fault why did Frank, Dodd, and Waters block Republican efforts to reign them in 2005?" Shuster and Klein, just shills for ever-expanding government!
@vince33x YEA SMALLER GOV. The Eggs will kill you, the spinch will kill you, the peanut butter will kill you, the Gulf is full of oil. SHRINK THAT GOV.
The Dem tried to block it, yet we dont see large numbers of black home owners defaulting do we ??? Lets face it ya bullshit RW fuck turn off the radio and read a book. Try Free Fall by Stigletz, you might learn something.
@vince33x Your facts come from the radio. Thats not fact, thats agenda. Thats a fact.
Now I dare you to pick a page in her book and argue it. The problem is, reading a book forces you to think for your self. You dont want to think for your self. Beck wants to think for you, so you let him. You cant argue facts because you dont have any, all you have is Becks agenda.
@rickbar123 So, if I'm to follow your logic, when the radio tells me there's been a wreck on the '405' it's not a fact. I think your "facts" are a little fractured my friend!
Delousinal nonsense. Bush's ownership society never intimidated private issuers to make risky loans. That was Democrat policy: Fan, Fred. This woman is a liberal arts deg who knows nothing about economics. Gotta hand it to MSNBC.
Blame low interest rates. Cheap money finds it's way into asset classes every single time. Has been happening ever since we set up Central Banks to manipulate credit and currency. You can't write enough regulations if you have that incentive. Kill the Fed, you don't have artificially low rates driving bad investments and speculation and hence, no need for regulations. Naomi is a piss poor economist.
@johny344 Yea, idiots like Tavis Smiley on government-controlled TV (PBS) give this buffoon a forum because her baloney fits in with Obama's fantasy that the economic crunch was caused by "Wall Street Greed." It Wasn't! Primary culprits: CRA; Federal Reserve; Fannie & Freddie. And while Republicans bear some culpability, it was Democrats who passed the CRA & created Fannie & Freddie and blocked regulations supported by Republicans who wanted to reign in their buying of high risk mortgages!!!
EasyEs, you don't really know what you're talking about. Thanks to Paul Martin, Canadian banks were *NOT* deregulated. They have to keep high risk assets on their balance sheets and therefore Canadian banks are doing better than most banks around the world. Regulation works, it's just about having a smart balance between too much regulation and too little regulation as has been the case subprime mortgage crisis, dotcom before, Enron, Long Term Capital Management, S & L, it's been a long list!
Have you even read the Shock Doctrine or any of her books? Her beliefs are very well founded and she is quickly becoming on the most respected Canadian journalists of our time... American's, do listen to this women and read what she has to say before you criticizer her...
I didn't read all of No Logo but I read shock Doctrine and it was terrible. She in some cases makes up facts and comes to some very flawed conclusions. The American financial markets didn't fail due to de-regulation. They collapsed because a declining export market took the rug out from actual value on banks balance sheets and all they had left were toxic assets left that were forced on them by the federal government.
Canadian banks had no laws preventing them from lending in this way.
@rorygallard7 Shes not a complexity economics. Hell she isn't even a mainstream economist. I haven't read her books but I heard a sufficient amount of her utter ignorance to make a fairly informed construction of her beliefs.
Taxpayers are supporting the rich while the people suffer more and more every day! Those who do support and approve of the current administration must be the elite or the mentally disabled. And who are those who would vote for more of the same?
Market fundamentalists want to have their cake and eat it too. They want the government guarantees without the government oversight, and then when the whole thing comes crumbling down they want to rinse and repeat. ENOUGH.
Market fundamentalism refers to unfettered laissez-faire capitalism. Fundamentalists by definition do not want government guarantees because it entails intervention. Therefore you just contradicted yourself.
Free markets didn't bring about the collapse either. One key attribute of a free market is an unregulated price that is allowed to fluctuate according to supply and demand. The price in the money market was arbitrarily held down by the FEDERAL RESERVE. Learn something.
Well as far as Fannie and Freddie Mac both have had executives sued by the SEC for fraud related to subprime loans. These are the first charges brought against people connected to the financial collapse.
CrowdPleeza 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I watched your video and I really understand your frustration. If you want to make Bank of America pay for what they did to you, and thousands of others, you should watch this guy's video;
DEADLY BLOW ! TO Bank of America
You should contact this guy, he is really serious.
unitedwestand1775 1 year ago
This woman is an inveterate liar. The Bush administration tried to reign in Fannie & Freddie and Democrats Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Maxine Waters blocked Republican efforts to regulate these government created corporations.
Of course David Shuster doesn't have the "stones" to ask tough questions like: "If that's the case and this is Bush's fault why did Frank, Dodd, and Waters block Republican efforts to reign them in 2005?" Shuster and Klein, just shills for ever-expanding government!
vince33x 1 year ago
@vince33x YEA SMALLER GOV. The Eggs will kill you, the spinch will kill you, the peanut butter will kill you, the Gulf is full of oil. SHRINK THAT GOV.
The Dem tried to block it, yet we dont see large numbers of black home owners defaulting do we ??? Lets face it ya bullshit RW fuck turn off the radio and read a book. Try Free Fall by Stigletz, you might learn something.
rickbar123 1 year ago
@rickbar123 Nice comeback! Why don't you try arguing with facts instead of name-calling. Typical Left-Wing moron!
vince33x 1 year ago
@vince33x Your facts come from the radio. Thats not fact, thats agenda. Thats a fact.
Now I dare you to pick a page in her book and argue it. The problem is, reading a book forces you to think for your self. You dont want to think for your self. Beck wants to think for you, so you let him. You cant argue facts because you dont have any, all you have is Becks agenda.
rickbar123 1 year ago
@rickbar123 So, if I'm to follow your logic, when the radio tells me there's been a wreck on the '405' it's not a fact. I think your "facts" are a little fractured my friend!
Beam me up Scotty!
vince33x 1 year ago
Delousinal nonsense. Bush's ownership society never intimidated private issuers to make risky loans. That was Democrat policy: Fan, Fred. This woman is a liberal arts deg who knows nothing about economics. Gotta hand it to MSNBC.
jkirk1626 1 year ago
Blame low interest rates. Cheap money finds it's way into asset classes every single time. Has been happening ever since we set up Central Banks to manipulate credit and currency. You can't write enough regulations if you have that incentive. Kill the Fed, you don't have artificially low rates driving bad investments and speculation and hence, no need for regulations. Naomi is a piss poor economist.
razerfish 1 year ago
Comment removed
jehu737 2 years ago
Comment removed
jehu737 2 years ago
wow, she has taken facts and spun them horribly. It terrifies me that people will agree with this lady.
johny344 2 years ago
@johny344 Yea, idiots like Tavis Smiley on government-controlled TV (PBS) give this buffoon a forum because her baloney fits in with Obama's fantasy that the economic crunch was caused by "Wall Street Greed." It Wasn't! Primary culprits: CRA; Federal Reserve; Fannie & Freddie. And while Republicans bear some culpability, it was Democrats who passed the CRA & created Fannie & Freddie and blocked regulations supported by Republicans who wanted to reign in their buying of high risk mortgages!!!
vince33x 1 year ago
EasyEs, you don't really know what you're talking about. Thanks to Paul Martin, Canadian banks were *NOT* deregulated. They have to keep high risk assets on their balance sheets and therefore Canadian banks are doing better than most banks around the world. Regulation works, it's just about having a smart balance between too much regulation and too little regulation as has been the case subprime mortgage crisis, dotcom before, Enron, Long Term Capital Management, S & L, it's been a long list!
royaltetley 2 years ago
idiot!
Invirtuo 2 years ago
Americans don't listen to this women. Us Canadians don't.
EasyEs 2 years ago
speak for yourself
rorygallard7 2 years ago
Really? You believe what this women has to say?..seriously don't, you'll be better off.
EasyEs 2 years ago
Have you even read the Shock Doctrine or any of her books? Her beliefs are very well founded and she is quickly becoming on the most respected Canadian journalists of our time... American's, do listen to this women and read what she has to say before you criticizer her...
rorygallard7 2 years ago
I didn't read all of No Logo but I read shock Doctrine and it was terrible. She in some cases makes up facts and comes to some very flawed conclusions. The American financial markets didn't fail due to de-regulation. They collapsed because a declining export market took the rug out from actual value on banks balance sheets and all they had left were toxic assets left that were forced on them by the federal government.
Canadian banks had no laws preventing them from lending in this way.
EasyEs 2 years ago
@rorygallard7 Shes not a complexity economics. Hell she isn't even a mainstream economist. I haven't read her books but I heard a sufficient amount of her utter ignorance to make a fairly informed construction of her beliefs.
axe863 1 year ago
EasyEs - your right, bailouts are cover up for Bush & Clinton era see:
"Who Is Leo Wanta?
FollowThe money all the to "The Ante Chamber"
Goldman Sachs is the main one to check
ngonea 2 years ago
seen it yesterday! lets chat
why cant i see the video Jp
2resident 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TALK TO ME
im bored on cam sq
0542215909 3 years ago
Capitalism is dead.
Onetimerule 3 years ago
yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!
resystm 3 years ago
It has been dead for a long time. The cancer of socialism is still sucking off the dead host.
zorbacci 3 years ago 2
Capitalism was declared in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act.
batgirl791 3 years ago
central planning is the fed which is not capitolist you retard
im sick of you commie fuckers
jonLukasC 3 years ago
yeah, I meant "declared dead". typo, not retarded...haha
batgirl791 3 years ago
ohh
jonLukasC 3 years ago
Richard S Fuld...Lehman Bros Chairman!
This cracker should have sought advice from WU TANG FINANCIAL.
"Diversify ya bonds, nigga!"
Protect ya neck!
UncleRico13 3 years ago 3
Taxpayers are supporting the rich while the people suffer more and more every day! Those who do support and approve of the current administration must be the elite or the mentally disabled. And who are those who would vote for more of the same?
connielane 3 years ago 6
supporting the same old parasites that have been doing it for centuries, perhaps as far back as the time of the pharaohs;)
randompal 3 years ago
Market fundamentalists want to have their cake and eat it too. They want the government guarantees without the government oversight, and then when the whole thing comes crumbling down they want to rinse and repeat. ENOUGH.
j0hnwi11iams 3 years ago 11
@j0hnwi11iams
Market fundamentalism refers to unfettered laissez-faire capitalism. Fundamentalists by definition do not want government guarantees because it entails intervention. Therefore you just contradicted yourself.
Free markets didn't bring about the collapse either. One key attribute of a free market is an unregulated price that is allowed to fluctuate according to supply and demand. The price in the money market was arbitrarily held down by the FEDERAL RESERVE. Learn something.
CircleBastiat 1 year ago