Added: 2 years ago
From: TheUFOeffect
Views: 47,467
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (118)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • At least 8 people don't know the difference between 'Weather' and 'Whether'.

  • Why 36?

  • Yellow and orange probably lesser distinct differentiation capacity for human sight :) great video thoUGH!

  • Whats the whole point of a Rodin Coil ?? why is it different from a classic toroid coil say on a ferite core?

  • It looks like a tool of Satan to me! just kidding.. nice pentagram.

  • @TheUFOeffect: I'm sure buying some extruded polystyrene and carving the foam into whatever sized toroid you would like wouldn't be to hard of a thing to do. however if you do that you would need to wrap it in tape some sort of tape or something to make the outside harder. You could also do buy clay and shape it into a toroid and then let it dry. You can even make your own play dough probably and do it. In actually is is relatively hard to find large toroids for sale. It's difficult to machine.

  • Hi! Can I ask you some questions? So A wrap is one wire, and B wrap is a separate wire, not the same wire? If you were going to do, say, three A wrappings, would you do them all first, then do three B wrappings? Also, what gauge wire did you use here. Thanks!

  • @RunAMuckGirl2: Yes a and b are separate wrapping. wrap all of a first, then b. wire gauge doesn't matter. but the higher the better because if the wire if thinner you can fit more wrappings.

  • @TheUFOeffect That was a fast reply! LOL Thanks so much. :o)

  • @RunAMuckGirl2: Your welcome

  • Comment removed

  • i guess thats 1 way of making a starship coil but a rodin it is not

  • Thanks!

  • Dude, see crop circle spirals on google... Aetheron Flux Monopole Emanations

  • thank u so much for sharing. u made it easy for me. :) bless u

  • note! image at 5:31 is incorrect. notice how the 3rd bend is the same as the 2nd. (wire failed to pass through center of toroid.)

  • pardon me for asking, what special thing can this thing do?

  • I don't understand what you mean when you say wind the b coil the other way. there both right hand weaves.

  • @Spargue; Thd current is reversed in the B coil. If you look at winding the coil by starting with the positive and ending with the negative you would wrape it the other way. Yes, if you look at the coil from above they both look clockwise. But the A current is clockwise and the B current is Counter Clockwise.

  • @TheUFOeffect This would be clearer if you n others that jumped on the rodin coil bandwagon used proper terminology. The B coil is wound in exactly the same way, and the polarity is reversed. Though this is then just a crude bi-fuller winding; which results in a zero magnetic field.

  • @Spargue: There is a magnetic field. The magnetic field dont cancel out. This isn't a scalar device.

  • @TheUFOeffect I think Maxwell would disagree with you there. All B-field lines are closed loops. To have an open B-field would result in a monopole magnet (never been observed). If you ran 2 opposing currents there would be inductive interference resulting in many small B-fields. but nothing significant. If you can show otherwise please post some results of parallel currents vs opposing currents.

  • @Spargue: Magnetic Monopole: Think this test has flaws but you cant say it has never been observed. watch?v=RnjW1zROJPc

  • @TheUFOeffect The drill bit has been tempered. The structure of the steel is different on the shaft and tip than of the mounting point. There is a cut in filming between measuring the bit outside the coil and inside. Even if the coil produced the north pole one one side, there is no reason why it wouldn't produce a north pole on the other side as it's still the same rotational winding about the axis. To do what you claim would throw all of Maxwell's equations, and relativity into dispute

  • @Spargue: I said the test has flaws. don't forget that statement. I dont claim it, others like marko and jamie buturff claim it.

  • @TheUFOeffect Then why are you showing this as evidence when you yourself are suspect of the method?

    My original point was that Maxwell's equations disagree that a counter current system in this configuration would produce a strong magnetic field. A counter current will cancel out the self inductance of the first coil, bar a small amount due to displacement of the windings, resulting in a very weak field not observable at a significant distance.

  • @Spargue: All i can say is that there is an observable magnetic field that is useable.

  • @TheUFOeffect Then please show a vidio showing a larger field when current is in opposing polarity vs complamentery polarity. As I origonally asked you to show.

  • @Spargue: I never said the magnetic field was larger when they were opposing, i said there was an observable magnetic field you you could use. watch?v=GAhe06RVS1E

  • @TheUFOeffect This doesn't show whether the coils are coupled in favour or opposing each other. I don't doubt the field exists. Just that when current is opposing, it is a much weaker field.

  • @Spargue Why in the HELL are u talking about Maxwells equations???. u are basing your observations of a Rodin coil,on Forged,Falsified equations???. U do realize NONE of the equations that u have been taught as Maxwells are NOT HIS equations.so STOP trying to find higher scientific TRUTH,by "Working from a LIE".

  • @myleftnutts Because I have a degree in electronics. These equations accurately describe electromagnetic fields and electrostatic fields. Weather Maxwell discovered them or not doesn't change the fact they describe electromagnetic waves.

    I find it hard to accept you know what you're talking about in this respect when even grammar escapes your understanding.

  • @Spargue hahahahahahaha

  • @Spargue Not only electromagnetic waves, but electrostatic and electrodynamic fields as well, as is pertinent to this discussion. My question would be: why not just wind a solenoid? Isn't that a more efficient use of current to produce a magnetic field?

  • Comment removed

  • I like the Chrono Trigger music. Nice touch!

  • music sounds like boards of canada

  • Uh, but what can you do with it?

  • The way Rodin explains it, the gap is meant to be between the first and second windings. Though I don't know if it makes a difference to the configuration once its complete except the start/finish points. Haven't made one yet but very keen to. Do you know how important pulse frequency is when the windings are running parallel (equal/opposite directions)?

  • @book1a: Its weird, in his math diagrams he shows it like you said, in between the 1st and 2nd coil. But in his rodin coil that he shows people its the 3rd winding. No, I don't know any frequencies.

  • Comment removed

  • Wiki's ok for general info however I wouldnt rely on it for acedemic knowledge, that comes from research from various sourses and then making a conclosuin. great vid though!

  • what's up with the music? ......why ?

  • @Penksimo If you knew what this concept is capable of, You would have found the music very fitting.

  • @Penksimo beautiful

  • how to harness energy from this coil?

  • @hatsoff456: you can run power through coil 1 and use the second coil as a pickup coil. watch some other videos. People are finding the rodin coil to be a small transformer

  • Comment removed

  • @hatsoff456: to harness the energy you hook it up to a load. you may put 10 volts in and get 100+ volts coming out the wires of the second coil. more voltage however doesn't nesseccerily mean its overunity or free energy. Volt don't mean much, Watts is the power unit that you want to measure for input and output. V*I=W

  • @TheUFOeffect thanks. so, this set up that you showed, how much wattage can we get out of? if i make a five ft rodin coil, what can theoretically happen? thanks again. i will try this.

  • @hatsoff456: Well thats where you come in. Your making the rodin coil. Nobody knows, you'll have to build the coil record the input wattage and output wattage Vs the ID and OD of the coil.

  • music is fucking annoying

  • Tesla hated John Keely... but after seeing John Keely proven fraud, hit by a street car only to suffer pneumonia and death... he still rocked him again and the earth he was in. He left a quip.. so you know he did win.

    THE YEAR HE DIED... THE DAY HE WAS BORN.

    The day our very planet was also torn...

    September 3, 1899. The biggest day in the history of science. The largest impact mankind has ever had upon nature...

    "If you only knew the magnificence of the 333;

    then you would have a Keely too."

  • Hello! I have a quick ? for you: @ around 3:16 or so into this video, your diagram says that @ that step you are supposed to make sure the wire goes UNDER (again)..., right? But when I look at your diagram (@3:48) which shows 1/2 of the winding for "A," it looks (to ME, at least!) like it's going straight across the top right there? I am just trying to make sense of this 1 step @ a time... (so I thought I'd ask!) Sorry for being a pain! (thanks!)

  • @ravensmomscorp76; any questions and feedback are welcome. adn yes your right, there is a mistake there. i really wish i had some better art programs.

  • @ravensmomscorp76 "Thirds, sixths, and ninths, are extraordinarily powerful."

    -John Keely

    "If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 & 9;

    then you would have a key to the universe."

    -Nikola Tesla

    "If you only knew the magnificence of the 333;

    then you would have a key to Tesla, Keely & the universe."

    --Biblical Prophet

    The biggest footprint of mankind

    September 3rd, 1899

  • What is that music?

  • @spiralcosmosart: music is "rings of uranus" i think it was in the audioswap. sorta majestical and hypnotic.

  • @TheUFOeffect not my anus.

  • If it didn't have this creepy music it would be much easier to watch

  • @Zertiof I love the music. Turn down the volume if you don't like it.

  • 1) Do the same thing with any number (36) to get similar results... identical in fact!

    2) Applications please (no pseudoscience, real life applications please)

    3) How does numerology relate to science?

    4) How does mysticism relate to science?

    5) Numerology is not maths.

  • @seansalvador1: Mysticism can relate to metapysics. also numerology is used in alot of advanced fields. even quantum physics, its used to find patterns. it is also used to figure cycles for astronomy such as moon cycles and such.

  • @TheUFOeffect

    Metaphysics is far from science.

    Numerology is NOT used in quantum physics (i have no idea where you got this... maybe you made it up?)

    It's not used in any scientific or mathematical subjects... name me one! Show me one instance of numerology being used in science.

    Bluff!

    Moon cycles?! This is a lie.

  • @seansalvador1: if your soo interested in this go look it up yourself. do your own research. and besides, mysticism and numerology doesn't even relate the this video. if you want, go ask those questions on the marko rodin mathematics series on youtube.

  • @TheUFOeffect

    I have. That's why i'm debunking it.

    The premise behind the whole thing IS numerology!

  • @seansalvador1: numerology isnt related to this video. im not explaining how it may work im explaining how to wire a coil.

  • @TheUFOeffect

    No. But the basis for the coil is numerology. It is claimed that this is scientific.

    That lie needs to be challenged.

  • @seansalvador1: you cant debunk a how to/guide video.

  • @TheUFOeffect

    I didn't say the how to. The coil itself is prima facie bullshit!

  • @seansalvador1 Why the Atlas detector of the LHC is an octagon?

  • @Shainkov

    Are you seriously suggesting that it is a rodin coil?

    You can look it up for yourself, saving me the bother of trying in vain to educate you...

  • @seansalvador1 no at all. but can you xplain ,why it has to be an octagon and not other polygon? why the number 8? educate us please.

  • @Shainkov

    Economical efficiency.

    It could be any polygon... What is your point?

  • @seansalvador1 so, there's no relation with numerology, or I-ching, or the cardinal points? it could be just a simple coincidence right?

  • @Shainkov

    You could have said the same about ANY number!

    That's why numerology is so infantile!

    Of course there is no relation...

    Is there a relation to the 8 key on my keyboard and the cosmological implications of i-ching? Are the 8 blossoms on the bush outside my window related to the Japanese peoples love affair with the number? No.

  • @seansalvador1 I am a prophet of the bible.

    Have an ear... the hour is here... like a thief in the night.

    The number is perfect. The signature of God.

    I was born 75 years to the day after the 1899 Cape Yakataga earthquakes caused by Nikola Tesla or I would have never been told. My social security# is six hundred and sixty-six. My Federal E.I.N. ends 666. I have counted the number of the beast and with insight I calculate the number of his name as a googol. 10^100. I bring proof from God.

  • @insightllc

    Piss off with your psychobabble and annoy someone who either

    a) doesn't have an understanding of physics (or suffers similar misaprehensions as you clearly do)

    or b) Is in a white coat of some description...

  • @insightllc

    Oh.. PS, the number of the beast in the bible is actually 616 (if you take the earliest copies).

  • @seansalvador1 I AM HERE EARTHQUAKE #333 IS NOT NORMAL AS SEISMOLOGY SHOULD BE (1) PRELUDE (2) GREAT SHOCK (3) AFTERSHOCKS THIS EVENT HAD MANY GREAT SHOCKS. September 3, September 10, September 10, September 15, September 17, September 23, September 26, THIS ONE HIDDEN AS 3 Is EARTHQUAKE #333 THE BIGGEST OF ALL TIME... NOW YOU SEE. TESLA WAS NOT O.C.D. WAVES IN THE BAY IN GROUPS OF 3 QUAKE#333 -Biblical Prophet
  • @seansalvador1 "IF YOU ONLY KNEW THE MAGNIFICENCE OF THE 3, 6 & 9;

    THEN YOU WOULD HAVE THE KEY TO THE 333" -NIKOLA TESLA

  • @insightllc

    These are not quotes. Tesla never said such a thing.

  • @seansalvador1

    HE SAID THESE... YOU TELL ME YOUR EXPLANATION OF 3, 6 & 9...

    ---

    "Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine."

    -- Nikola Tesla

    ---

    "If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9,

    then you would have a key to the universe."

    — Nikola Tesla

  • @seansalvador1 TESLA WAS NOT O.C.D. HE COULD NOT BRAG OF #333 RESEARCH EARTHQUAKE NO. 333 September 3, 1899 a quake so big, they hid it as three Earthquake No.(333) Earthquake No.(337) Earthquake No.(338) I proved it.
  • @seansalvador1 OK, let me first say that I am not a geologist, a seismologist or a physicist. I am simply someone who knows his grandpa would not lie. That said... I appreciate your superior knowledge on this matter even when it comes in the form of heckles. I am sure with your education, had he been your grandpa, you would have done a much better job at figuring out and explaining this matter but he was mine and I understand your doubt. Thank you for your time and giving me the opportunity...

  • @insightllc

    Liar

  • @seansalvador1 Good one. Everything is true. All of it. The social security number, my birthday, my grandpa, his deathbed, and everything else. I request help with this matter.

  • @insightllc

    Liar.

    Have you no concience?

  • @seansalvador1 You claim knowledge of science but don't understand this post is forever. It will stand epic for a thousand years. If you find one lie... it means nothing. Until then... shut the fuck up. I just grabbed the holy grail of debate. A billion to one shot... a Babe Ruth shot for the powers that be... Tesla made earthquake no. 333 on September 3, 1899 you now see.

  • @insightllc

    1) It is not forever.. nothing is

    2) You are lying. What is your real name. Send me an email. I'll post you my email address if you like, facebook me... I don't hide behind a false tag. I am who i say i am... very rare for the net.

    3) You are full of ambiguity. You tell me i'm notunderstanding you buit you have given me nothing but endless psychobabble!

  • @seansalvador1 SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH.

    I HAVE NOT ONCE LIED.

    MY SIMPLE TRUTH WILL PREVAIL.

    TESLA CAUSED EARTHQUAKE NO. 333 ON SEPTEMBER 3, 1899.

  • @insightllc

    Prove it then! If you cannot prove your claim, even by a simple email confirming who you are, then it's you who should shut the fuck up... cunt!

  • @seansalvador1 I AM AS I SAY I AM. You know my social security number. You know my birthday. You know my limited liability corporate name. You know my federal employer identification number. You know my phone number. You know my simple truth. TESLA MADE EARTHQUAKE NO. 333 ON SEPTEMBER 3, 1899...

    and now you know I am not lying.

  • @seansalvador1

    PICK YOUR JAW UP SCIENCE.

    FUCK A BIBLE.

    TESLA MADE EARTHQUAKE #333.

  • @Shainkov

    You do know it's just a detector don't you? That it is passive?

  • @seansalvador1 YOU GUYS BETTER QUIT THE DUMB SHIT.

    MARKO WE WILL PARTY. IF YOU ARE YET TO FATHOM... TRUST ME. Tesla caused 1899 Cape Yakataga and Yakutat bay earthquakes from Colorado Springs lab.

    Sept. 3, 1899

    Sept. 6, 1899

    Sept. 9, 1899

    "If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 & 9;

    then you would have a key to the universe."

    -Nikola Tesla

  • @insightllc

    Idiot

  • @seansalvador1 "Most certainly I tell you, if you have faith, and don't doubt, you will not only do what was done to the fig tree, but even if you told this mountain, 'Be taken up and cast into the sea,' it would be done."

    -Biblical Prophet

  • @seansalvador1 SHATTERED GLACIERS! THREW UP THE LIFE FROM THE SEA FIFTY EARTHQUAKES THE FIRST DAY AN EARTHQUAKE THAT WENT THE WRONG WAY THE GROUND WAS TOO SHOOTING AT YOU SEVEN MORE DAYS STILL LEFT TO GO BEFORE IT WAS THROUGH HE THREW MOUNTAINS TO SEA I WILL SHOW YOU WHO SAW IT WAS ME EARTHQUAKE #333
  • Question: Do you (or does anyone) know if the coils must be wound together one wind at a time? I wound mine separately in that I wound 9 windings with wire A and then 9 windings with wire B and then there was space left over for the empty non-winding C.

    Has anyone tested the difference? If not, I'll have to pick up some more toroid toys!

  • ? your wires should go AAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBCCCCCCCCC. ABCABCABCABCABCABCABCABCABC is wrong.

  • Je mets 5 étoile car c'est une excellente démonstration.

  • going to have to put this in the favorites

    5stars

  • thank you...it means a lot!

  • very nice put together

  • great job with the vid.

  • thanks

  • Excellent !!!

  • im going to put out another video of the step by step procedures for estimating the total wire lenght needed for a rodin coil.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more