What a waste of time compare these graphics cards, for me, i would to have one of those, and who's not?, if i could get one of those cards then i'll be able to forget about bad performance for about 5 years, but god what a waste of money for me, and at 120 fps i feel it to fast for my eyes, i'm happy with even 25 fps and to much people too, and yes, stop this stupid comparisons. Sorry my bad english
The gtx 295 is a Card that nobody wants anymore . Dx10 ,Sucks Power like Crazy ... I had one and the tried a gtx 460 ,I'm Sticking with the gtx 460, I got it Overclocked to 900mhz ,The gtx 460 has much Smoother FPS rate..
All the bitterness between Nvidia fanboys and ATI fanboys is rediculous... how will anyone ever be fucking king... every damn card gets replace in like 6 month intervals so the next person to come out with a card is obviously gonna be better... 295 was incredible when it came out and its been out for a while now so 5970 came out its only expected to be better... quit trying to make everything into a damn competition.
core i7 920 can't even feed the gpu's to really show what they can do, 980x or Phenom II X6 will do the trick on windows 7 ultimate 64bit with at least 8gigs of DDR3-1600mhz with SSDs
About a 30 fps difference. It is almost virtually impossible to tell the difference with the naked eye. Still, they both are extremely hard to find and extremely expensive.
I was a big fun of ATI, but for me it's not only a matter of a number in frames. You have to consider also support (e.g drivers) which for ATI really sucks, as also compatibility with other OS (e.g Linux) where again ATI sucks. Frames are more or less the same. 10 frames in the range of +/-110FPS it really cannot prove anything.
It's not? And where is Cuda for Ati ? Where is Physyx, where is 3D Vision support ? That's what you pay for the extra money in NVidia. I don't mean to create a new driver every week, Plus, that till now there is no proper 3D support in Linux.
@valandrio You are definitely right. Nvidia has got nice features, such as the 3D support and PhysX but still ATi is cheaper only regarding the performance in FPS.
(and it brought DX11 to us earlier, but I guess the DX11 cards by nvidia will come soons too.)
But as I said these features of Nvidia are nice and I hope ATi will ceate something similar soon.
@BhunaBhuna its the loading how higher the fps the better the performance in new game that use better graphics the have a spare part of fps that can be use. got it its easy.
@LolCaramelz ummmm, the GTX 295 is an older card, it was brought out to stomp the 4890s ATi brought out. of course the NEW 5970 is going to be better. wait till Nvidia brings out a dual GPU Fermi GTX something DX11 to combat the 5970s.
@LolCaramelz Uhh are you retarded? The GTX 295 is the equivalent of the 4870 x2 card NOT the 5970 but of course it destroyed the 4870 x2 and does well vs the 5970. I'm sure the CO-OP superclocked version would do much better since gtx 295 is old.
it's funny how the textures of t-shirts are different @ 1:21. :) Fermi is the right card to compare with the 59xx series. It's coming out at the right time, karnak99... For now, there are only TWO games which support DX11 (and the tesselation eye candy): Dirt 2 and Battle Forge. Not even a single FPS for now. First one will be STALKER Call of Pripriat. But... "can you buy it in the store? No. " :)) Anyway, quit being fanboys and buy what suit your needs...
My 295 has had problems since I got it. Empire total war I can't even fully maxs full AA and all. And this bench beat my 295 by 9fps but mines overclocked even. im lost. and yes my other specs are fine
The newest ones which im starting to think suck. I read that etw hardly uses the 2nd gpu in dual gpu's so thats why thats messed up, and also these drivers mess it up. The drivers also mess up a this benchmark, (the really long one). After seeing that 295 beat me, either there using a extreme i7, or its overclocked higher then mine.
@dirtbikeryzz you don't need AA if you have more than about 720p but anyways theres something wrong with your card if it can't anyway because mine can
@PkerWhomerang Nothings wrong with my card, I posted the lack of performance on the total war forum and tons of people said the game simple runs like shit on the 295.
@dirtbikeryzz something easily overlooked is power given to the card, not using a driver sweeper to remove the old ones before installing new drivers or even getting a faulty card.
Then again we are just benefitting from this considering the substantial price drop of the cards every time a new one is released. Keep at it ATI and Nvidia
Its just up to the release date , wether Nvidia delays the GF100 , they promised to have it out near Q1 and from the specs on their site one single gf100 GPU is stronger than the 2 GPUS in the gtx295 , you could just imagine the power of 2 gf100s in one card but then again probably a price tag of over 1K. Either way ive known from experience by having both cards from ATI and Nvidia that these wars will never stop they will never have the strongest card one will keep countering the other nonstop.
lol is not in your hand you mean.... anyway there some leaked benchmark and the card was at CES and the card is in production right now is not a white paper anymore...... u need to google 5min man....
im a bit dissapointed with the performance of the new 5 series of ATI, with this performance its clear that when the gt300 is released it will the king again, come on its only a 15-20% faster than the old generation of nvidia, i mean a single gt300 surely will outperform the gtx 295, even the new gf100 tested in las vegas ces 2010 was runing smoothly the unigine engine 1080p tessellation on, something that 5970 barely can, and that was a MID-RANGE card the top ones will come a little bit later
if nvidia follows its past releases...then actually all a gt300 will be is a 295 on a single gpu...for example...the gtx 280(which is what i have atm).... is a 9800gx2 on a single gpu..etc..etc...
i dont know if id go as far as to say their cards suck ass..lol, but Ati just kicked their ass with the release of the 5800=5900 line up.
gtx 280 in sli im getting 84fps in "heaven bench..1920x 1200 16x filtering no aa...with 2 aa getting 77fps......Crysis max settings 4 aa...50fps avg. not too shabby for suck ass cards..lol Probably going with 2 5970's in the near future...because im likin what im seein...plus eyefinity support.
I think that the biggest difference is that Nvidia was support for PhysX whilst Ati has support for DX11. At the moment PhysX is more useful than DX11, however how long until DX11 really takes off is anyones guess...
what jacobts said , the gtx 295 is one year older than the new ati card , it wouldnt be fair comparing the two. we would need to wait for Nvidia to come out with the 300 series
Omfg u nvidia noob shut up... The 5970 was made to out perform the 295 by a decent amount and it did... Fermi was a flop so that why nvidia had to delay it... ATI is winning at the moment get over it...
4870's is the older series and they are not DX11 hardware cards the 5000 series are made for DX 11 so buying a 4870 would be buying a older tech video card that will fall behind quickly.
whats the point.....when Nvidia finally gets off their asses and releases the gt 300 series the 5970 will be at least a 6 month old card. So how would it be fair to compare a brand new Nvidia card to a 6 month old Ati card?...Now if they both released at the same time, ( like they were supposed to...i think Nvidia got scared) that would be a different story.
btw I am no Ati fanboy , i have Nvidia cards, I have 2 gtx 280's. Now i might be swaying towards Ati because they have eyefinity,
not much of a difference ,after owning my 280gtx for almost a yr im going to buy another one and should be little bit more powerful than 295gtx and only 269bucks,way better than buying 5970. just sli my card with another 280!!!
hey you nvidia fan boys. stop trying to find an excuse why the gtx 295 is slower than the ati. its simply slower ati won this round. try to live with it or forget about it. the 5970 has an advantage that no nvidia card has. it gives a fuck about antialaising. all games run the same on 8xAA and no AA and this is something that nvidia will never beat. i actually was a nvidia fan boy but after ive seen the 5970 im pro ati
The " Nvidia optimized" is bullshit, the only engine that has true optimization is source engine for ati. We all know that you are talking about crysis too
That may be true, but the monitor doesnt produce the images the way our eyes see. If you wave your hand in front of your face, do you see every detail on your skin, no. Our brain and eyes blur images together, but computers have to produce single "still" images that can be paused at any moment, and everything would be clear as day, even the truck racing by you at 240 miles per hour. This motion blur makes everything we see much smoother, and life-like.We compensate for it with faster frame rates
the card is made months later. nvidia has all the tim in the world to improve their fermi cards just in order to beat the 5970. what it will cost is the true question
No contest.
Voldness 3 weeks ago
acctualy youre eye sees more then 60 fps cause it dosent have a limit do you have fps drops in real life?
jagserdig123 9 months ago
@jagserdig123 Having limits doesn't mean it has drops~ ... your logic is really confusing. I don't even know how you even went there.
strikerk 8 months ago
Haha, the GTX 295 looks like a VHS tape!
sandiegoborn32 11 months ago
And 5970 is an dx11 new cardand the 295 is dx10 plus it is old. The 580 is stronger and is s dx11 card new so yeah
Sonerdy123 1 year ago
The 580 is strong but yall don't notice is that the 5970 is a dual gpu so nvidia still smoke ati aka amd
Sonerdy123 1 year ago
My rig can do even better than this:-
I got
inter core i7 processor
8gigs of ram
2 terabytes of HDD
and the nvidia greatest card GeForce GTX 580
it can do upto 200 to 250 fps
Its awesome
Anubhav9910058680 1 year ago
@Anubhav9910058680 this game is optimized for nvidia...
IIAkaHoshiII 8 months ago
my laptop have more graphics power than that!!!!
rubenname 1 year ago
Uhh, I know you did. But I brought in new updates for that ass ;)
eltiernit0 1 year ago
What a waste of time compare these graphics cards, for me, i would to have one of those, and who's not?, if i could get one of those cards then i'll be able to forget about bad performance for about 5 years, but god what a waste of money for me, and at 120 fps i feel it to fast for my eyes, i'm happy with even 25 fps and to much people too, and yes, stop this stupid comparisons. Sorry my bad english
NECROMETALOXICO 1 year ago
not really your eyes can see way more then 60fps they dont have a refesh rate like on a monitor.
iamimpossible147 1 year ago
The gtx 295 is a Card that nobody wants anymore . Dx10 ,Sucks Power like Crazy ... I had one and the tried a gtx 460 ,I'm Sticking with the gtx 460, I got it Overclocked to 900mhz ,The gtx 460 has much Smoother FPS rate..
mrjamesb562 1 year ago
such an expensive set-up and they cant even place the sticker in the middle of the fan....thats quite annoying.
BlueBellyfluff 1 year ago
90 fps for this game its also cool!
SendeRukr 1 year ago
Nvidia 0wned
lowbob1994 1 year ago
i find it funny that i cant get more than 20fps
im DEAD!
chris3d165 1 year ago
kewl.........try battlfield bad company 2<<<
quangluu96 1 year ago
ATI THE BEST, IN RESIDENT EVIL 5 STUPID FAGGOTS, NVIDIA HAS OTHER INPORTANTS THINGS BETTER THAN ATI RADEON.(NO PHYSIX,PUREVIDEO,....THAT SHIT)
I PREFER A LITTLE BIT NVIDIA
xJUDAZ 1 year ago
the thing is, you should compare the 5970 to the 480, then see what kind of results you get ;)
xyq99 1 year ago
@xyq99 u won't see anything but 5970 beating the shit outta 480
pandamax2 1 year ago
i don't know much about PCs but i am surprised to see that they only use 6Gb of memory, and not * or 12. is there a reasonable explanation? -thx
NuMetal92 1 year ago
@NuMetal92 its more about the speed of the memory rather than how much you have.
Camcon777 1 year ago
The human eye cant see more than 29.6 FPS so if you are running a game at 30+ FPS u cannot see lag.
xComputerGodx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xComputerGodx
hahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
The human eye cant see more than 100 FPS ;)
Have you ever played a game with 30 fps ? it's fucking laggy.
Movies have 29.6 fps and it's fluid because each frames has blur.
coilouch 1 year ago
the music just made my day
UEFAEurope 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
img69.imageshack.us/img69/4720/residentevilfps.jpg <<< screen :D
pauliux123 1 year ago
hey guys i get exactly same avg FPS with ATI Radeon 5870 at 900 1300mhz.
pauliux123 1 year ago
Why would you even want such a high fps?
The eye cannot see more than 60 fps.
Seltora 1 year ago
All the bitterness between Nvidia fanboys and ATI fanboys is rediculous... how will anyone ever be fucking king... every damn card gets replace in like 6 month intervals so the next person to come out with a card is obviously gonna be better... 295 was incredible when it came out and its been out for a while now so 5970 came out its only expected to be better... quit trying to make everything into a damn competition.
DarkKnight896 1 year ago
core i7 920 can't even feed the gpu's to really show what they can do, 980x or Phenom II X6 will do the trick on windows 7 ultimate 64bit with at least 8gigs of DDR3-1600mhz with SSDs
silverfearn 1 year ago
thats still very low fps for a 5970!
kevinjones1985 1 year ago
@kevinjones1985
shut upp you moron !!!! ahahahah "still low fps for 5970"
NikolaLakic96 1 year ago
@NikolaLakic96 It is you fool! you obviously dont understand!
kevinjones1985 1 year ago
Hd5970 Owned GTX295 xD
T3IIIo0 1 year ago
why dont people perform benchmarks using setitngs of 1920 x 1080 + 16xaa why do they always keep 0xaa
Goldenkidyash70 1 year ago
I have the same pc. Why in my computer run this only 60 fps????
AGSystem27 1 year ago
Can you buy me one of these computers please Mr trubritar? Please with a cherry on top.
CookieMonzta1995 1 year ago
WOW... comparisons between ATI's top card with dx11 with Nvidia's dx10 is not fair!
get GTX 480, these 2 cards are way different.
ilikewiigames 1 year ago
PhysX is overrated nigies
so sell your Nvidia GPU and buy ATI gpus you wont regret that
ganondorffromhell 1 year ago
About a 30 fps difference. It is almost virtually impossible to tell the difference with the naked eye. Still, they both are extremely hard to find and extremely expensive.
Agownsrs2 1 year ago
I was a big fun of ATI, but for me it's not only a matter of a number in frames. You have to consider also support (e.g drivers) which for ATI really sucks, as also compatibility with other OS (e.g Linux) where again ATI sucks. Frames are more or less the same. 10 frames in the range of +/-110FPS it really cannot prove anything.
valandrio 1 year ago
its averagely 30 frames different. The driver support of ATi is not as bad as you say. ATi is just cheaper and
hirni4ever 1 year ago
@hirni4ever
It's not? And where is Cuda for Ati ? Where is Physyx, where is 3D Vision support ? That's what you pay for the extra money in NVidia. I don't mean to create a new driver every week, Plus, that till now there is no proper 3D support in Linux.
valandrio 1 year ago
@valandrio You are definitely right. Nvidia has got nice features, such as the 3D support and PhysX but still ATi is cheaper only regarding the performance in FPS.
(and it brought DX11 to us earlier, but I guess the DX11 cards by nvidia will come soons too.)
But as I said these features of Nvidia are nice and I hope ATi will ceate something similar soon.
hirni4ever 1 year ago
nVIDIA FTW :l
ATI for show.
it dies down after about 2 months of playing >.>
darknesh99 1 year ago
ATi for the win!
Voikanaa 1 year ago
ATI wins
KingOguzhan12 1 year ago
wow
kubomaniatico 1 year ago
ati radeon 5790 rocks
DevaBUNDA95 2 years ago
my eyes definitely see different between 60 and 125fps! (ps q3/ql player)
but i agree 90% monitors dont support more then 60hz but even on this type LCD 125fps looks much smoother.
3D8n52DmV37EI6oHeX 2 years ago
orly
MrIcwiener 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You eyes can only see at 24fps. There is NO difference
JupiterRoom 2 years ago
naah ur eyes can see 28fps(some jetfigthers can see 35) max. when ur good rested
hippievogelei 1 year ago
thatsis not true since you can see up to 60 fps grey and black colors ..
i can tell the difference between 60 and 30 fps
henryhenriquez 1 year ago
Comment removed
3D8n52DmV37EI6oHeX 1 year ago
If much smoother gameplay for you "NO difference" i dont know what to say, this rule work only for you, dont say about all people
3D8n52DmV37EI6oHeX 1 year ago
you need only 60 fps, your eye does not see more
but nice test :D
Gatehammer 2 years ago 19
@Gatehammer
the eye see's in real time ... there is no set framelimit
if you had to estimate it though it'd be something closer to 200-300fps >.>
however your monitor probably doesn't go past 60hz
WiiMaster20 2 years ago
Of course you cant, you just need to upgrade to eyes 2.0. LOL
Its not like sound you cant hear above or below a certain frequency, as much frame you throw at your eyes youll see them.
True not very much noticeable, but frames none the less.
naelscorpio 2 years ago
thats righ!
rukaras 2 years ago
The eye can see very many frames per secon but the brain cant register them.
mystuff3040 2 years ago
@Gatehammer Yes and no, if you get 60fps vs 120 i bet you see the difference
neider1 1 year ago
@Gatehammer still, if something huge happens on screen, you will see a difference between 120 fps and 60..
zumbza 1 year ago
@Gatehammer your eye sees whatever it can it fluctuates
illuminatioification 1 year ago
@Gatehammer IT does wiki it please
SmoogleVEVO 1 year ago
@Gatehammer not true, ppl mostly think that because of their monitor refresh rate, if it where 120 Hz u would be able to notice 120fps not just 60
FpsMerc 1 year ago
@Gatehammer Human eye sees only 27-30 fps
Nikk500 1 year ago
@Gatehammer Then why is there such a huge difference between 100fps and 300fps?
BhunaBhuna 8 months ago
@BhunaBhuna there is no diffrence :O
Gatehammer 8 months ago
@BhunaBhuna its the loading how higher the fps the better the performance in new game that use better graphics the have a spare part of fps that can be use. got it its easy.
TheVanGastel 2 days ago
The new King of the Hill has arrived ... until it is so famous Messiah called Geforce GT 300 ... if that comes first...
SandmanGodslayer 2 years ago
The GTX 295 looked a bit more realistic than the HD5970
Like the majini moving looked alot more realistic on GTX 295 than the 5970
HIIMDAVID12345555 2 years ago
Lol, what? So you're saying that animation, which has nothing to do with the graphics card, gets better with a graphics card? Yeah, placebo much?
MrKennyBones 2 years ago
Ima get a 295 for now though cuz im building a new pc, and its cheaper.
vjdsjgc 2 years ago
@vjdsjgc ¿cheaper? i´m lol´d
SandmanGodslayer 2 years ago
Yes, I have connections ;)
vjdsjgc 2 years ago
Into what kind of case will this card fit into? Im thinking of getting that 5970
SstalkerS 2 years ago
whose the real one leader in world graphic???hmmm
hitsugayafanz 2 years ago
The 5870 was nearly as fast as the 295.
The 5970(at high resolution especially) is the aboslute winner.
Just look at some benchmarks, it is ridiculous.
LolCaramelz 2 years ago 14
@LolCaramelz ummmm, the GTX 295 is an older card, it was brought out to stomp the 4890s ATi brought out. of course the NEW 5970 is going to be better. wait till Nvidia brings out a dual GPU Fermi GTX something DX11 to combat the 5970s.
lilHamminator 1 year ago
@LolCaramelz Agreed
Zergikun 1 year ago
@LolCaramelz Uhh are you retarded? The GTX 295 is the equivalent of the 4870 x2 card NOT the 5970 but of course it destroyed the 4870 x2 and does well vs the 5970. I'm sure the CO-OP superclocked version would do much better since gtx 295 is old.
eltiernit0 1 year ago
@eltiernit0
I said 5870 not 4870
You look
So stupid right now
LolCaramelz 1 year ago
i thought they'd have a bigger difference.
smfleu 2 years ago
I didn't, I thought it'd be a lot closer. :O
SteGuitar7 2 years ago
Do you guys even play games to have fun? Or just to see how many frames you can get??? Just curious
vjdsjgc 2 years ago
Both.
LolCaramelz 2 years ago
it's funny how the textures of t-shirts are different @ 1:21. :) Fermi is the right card to compare with the 59xx series. It's coming out at the right time, karnak99... For now, there are only TWO games which support DX11 (and the tesselation eye candy): Dirt 2 and Battle Forge. Not even a single FPS for now. First one will be STALKER Call of Pripriat. But... "can you buy it in the store? No. " :)) Anyway, quit being fanboys and buy what suit your needs...
Caesaurus 2 years ago
but bother paying another 400 bucks on a gcard that works just under the 5970 =/
LJRulzu 2 years ago
My 295 has had problems since I got it. Empire total war I can't even fully maxs full AA and all. And this bench beat my 295 by 9fps but mines overclocked even. im lost. and yes my other specs are fine
dirtbikeryzz 2 years ago
What drivers are you using?
trubritar 2 years ago 4
The newest ones which im starting to think suck. I read that etw hardly uses the 2nd gpu in dual gpu's so thats why thats messed up, and also these drivers mess it up. The drivers also mess up a this benchmark, (the really long one). After seeing that 295 beat me, either there using a extreme i7, or its overclocked higher then mine.
dirtbikeryzz 2 years ago
Fresh install your OS you probably have alot of clutter and crap. Get ccleaner afterwards too
mozart116 2 years ago
Comps a new build no clutter, either the 295 in the vids super overclocked or they didn't have max settings including res and AA
dirtbikeryzz 2 years ago
@dirtbikeryzz you don't need AA if you have more than about 720p but anyways theres something wrong with your card if it can't anyway because mine can
PkerWhomerang 1 year ago
@PkerWhomerang Nothings wrong with my card, I posted the lack of performance on the total war forum and tons of people said the game simple runs like shit on the 295.
dirtbikeryzz 1 year ago
@dirtbikeryzz maybe get a GTX260 then. I used to have one, it ran Empire really well.
PkerWhomerang 1 year ago
@dirtbikeryzz dude... 100-120fps is more than enough why do u ppl want such high fps when ur monitors cant show it xD?!
Nimerbushnaq 1 year ago
@Nimerbushnaq What you don't get is that 120fps isn't constant. People get drops from say 100 to 40 in a second... Think about it..
dirtbikeryzz 1 year ago
@dirtbikeryzz something easily overlooked is power given to the card, not using a driver sweeper to remove the old ones before installing new drivers or even getting a faulty card.
hitomearue 1 year ago
@dirtbikeryzz its probably ur processor
quangluu96 1 year ago
@quangluu96 I have an i7 960 @ 3.7ghz...
dirtbikeryzz 1 year ago
Then again we are just benefitting from this considering the substantial price drop of the cards every time a new one is released. Keep at it ATI and Nvidia
chuk92 2 years ago
Its just up to the release date , wether Nvidia delays the GF100 , they promised to have it out near Q1 and from the specs on their site one single gf100 GPU is stronger than the 2 GPUS in the gtx295 , you could just imagine the power of 2 gf100s in one card but then again probably a price tag of over 1K. Either way ive known from experience by having both cards from ATI and Nvidia that these wars will never stop they will never have the strongest card one will keep countering the other nonstop.
chuk92 2 years ago
in this bench the 5970 was aprox 30% faster than the gtx295
undeadelite 2 years ago
when is nvidia going to release the 3xxx series?
thegoldenboy294 2 years ago
the fermii is heree! shiee no one is safe not even this card.
yose3 2 years ago
@yose3 Fermi is not here. It is still just a paper beast. Can you buy it in the store? No.
karnak99 2 years ago 2
lol is not in your hand you mean.... anyway there some leaked benchmark and the card was at CES and the card is in production right now is not a white paper anymore...... u need to google 5min man....
yose3 2 years ago
I'm just gonna buy one.. 5970..
And for me that is way enough..
I must admitt seen the 5770 in action to and it's really fast with all eye candy on to for it's little price tag.
Dorisequador 2 years ago
Wtf HD 5970 kick ass
dumbzero 2 years ago
Ya I saw this card in action at the store where i go alot to check out new stuff it's sick fast and the graphics are incredabley awsome.
Dorisequador 2 years ago
The 295 is a whole year older! wait and this with the gt300!
teslognet 2 years ago
im a bit dissapointed with the performance of the new 5 series of ATI, with this performance its clear that when the gt300 is released it will the king again, come on its only a 15-20% faster than the old generation of nvidia, i mean a single gt300 surely will outperform the gtx 295, even the new gf100 tested in las vegas ces 2010 was runing smoothly the unigine engine 1080p tessellation on, something that 5970 barely can, and that was a MID-RANGE card the top ones will come a little bit later
elpoderosobeto 2 years ago
if nvidia follows its past releases...then actually all a gt300 will be is a 295 on a single gpu...for example...the gtx 280(which is what i have atm).... is a 9800gx2 on a single gpu..etc..etc...
nauls82 2 years ago
I hate to say it but some of Nvidia's high end suck ass...
Their midrage are awsome bang for buck..
Dorisequador 2 years ago
i dont know if id go as far as to say their cards suck ass..lol, but Ati just kicked their ass with the release of the 5800=5900 line up.
gtx 280 in sli im getting 84fps in "heaven bench..1920x 1200 16x filtering no aa...with 2 aa getting 77fps......Crysis max settings 4 aa...50fps avg. not too shabby for suck ass cards..lol Probably going with 2 5970's in the near future...because im likin what im seein...plus eyefinity support.
nauls82 2 years ago
I think that the biggest difference is that Nvidia was support for PhysX whilst Ati has support for DX11. At the moment PhysX is more useful than DX11, however how long until DX11 really takes off is anyones guess...
andrewbrownster2 2 years ago
cheaper really, the HD 5970 is over $600 dollars but i guess the performance is worth it
DarkKnight896 2 years ago
i have 5970 its the best graphick look my dirt 2 gameplay its monster
123onepiece2 2 years ago
Ahem:
ATi > Nvidia.
300 series probably won't defeat ATi anyway, they're always 1 step ahead. And, ATi cards are so much more fucking cheaper needless to say better.
DeeArrVoorhees 2 years ago 4
@DeeArrVoorhees Not olny cheaper... but also more powerfull than Nvidia's :D
alexfromgreece 2 years ago
@alexfromgreece, that's already obvious ;)
DeeArrVoorhees 2 years ago
what that there more powerful than nvidias old series of cards the 5970 is avout 20 percent better than a 295 which was released like a years ago
antec12gtx260 2 years ago
you can say cheaper yh but not better ever since the 8800ultra came out when nvidia releases its cards after ati they are always better
antec12gtx260 2 years ago
Now Nvidia is behind... ATI by alot.
Dorisequador 2 years ago
there behind with graphics cards that are like over a year old now
antec12gtx260 2 years ago
what jacobts said , the gtx 295 is one year older than the new ati card , it wouldnt be fair comparing the two. we would need to wait for Nvidia to come out with the 300 series
chuk92 2 years ago
@chuk92 Stfu. Nvidia GTX295 was the first card with dual on board cards, and is like 430€ now.
ATI's first dual on board card is this one(HD5970) and it outperformes the GTX295 in any way.
Nvidia just fails, accept it.
BomChickaWhawa 2 years ago
1. the 7900 GX2 was nvidias first dual gpu card
2. the 4870x2 was atis first dual gpu card and the 295 was better than it
antec12gtx260 2 years ago
Omfg u nvidia noob shut up... The 5970 was made to out perform the 295 by a decent amount and it did... Fermi was a flop so that why nvidia had to delay it... ATI is winning at the moment get over it...
Bf2FlyBoy 2 years ago
@antec12gtx260 the 4870x2 was out a lot longer before the 295 came
wickedroy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i didnt say that
i said "the 4870x2 was ati's first dual gpu card and the 295 was better than it "
when did i say that the 295 came out first
learn to read
antec12gtx260 2 years ago
4870's is the older series and they are not DX11 hardware cards the 5000 series are made for DX 11 so buying a 4870 would be buying a older tech video card that will fall behind quickly.
Dorisequador 2 years ago
@BomChickaWhawa FIRST DUAL ON BOARD CARD?
ati first dual gpu card was the Rage Fury Maxx!! u stupid learn before posting!
wwwwwoooeeee 2 years ago
besides the point, this is whats available on the market now.
falconianuk 2 years ago
whats the point.....when Nvidia finally gets off their asses and releases the gt 300 series the 5970 will be at least a 6 month old card. So how would it be fair to compare a brand new Nvidia card to a 6 month old Ati card?...Now if they both released at the same time, ( like they were supposed to...i think Nvidia got scared) that would be a different story.
btw I am no Ati fanboy , i have Nvidia cards, I have 2 gtx 280's. Now i might be swaying towards Ati because they have eyefinity,
nauls82 2 years ago
thank you a sencible comment
antec12gtx260 2 years ago
@SKARKIBANEZ you can see a difference after 60 fps, and if a card runs on 60fps, there would be many places where it hits 40 or lower.
and because the ati has higher fps means that it can run newer gams. wich gtx 295 cannot. dont u think that matters?
fuelofmilo 2 years ago
Why you fighting for the INFINITE BATTLE OF THE CARDS after 60 fps is all GOOD FUCK THE HUNTING OF THE BETTER FPS.........
V-sync is what matters and 60 hz....
That's all............
SKARKIBANEZ 2 years ago
@puelladeluxe lol if there came a new nvidia, better that the ati. all ati fans would whine like hell too. and make excuses too..
but yes the ati HD5970 is better that the nvidia gtx 295. there r u happy now?!
fuelofmilo 2 years ago
i agree that the ati`s would do that to. actually im not a real fan boy. i change my mind everytime a new card comes out
puelladeluxe 2 years ago
not much of a difference ,after owning my 280gtx for almost a yr im going to buy another one and should be little bit more powerful than 295gtx and only 269bucks,way better than buying 5970. just sli my card with another 280!!!
neweggbuilt 2 years ago
use the same video cards, but in a AMD rig and use fusion, i'm very curious to see the difference of them
Lesson333 2 years ago
5970 won by a lot with beta drivers
Jefneurotoxin 2 years ago
hey you nvidia fan boys. stop trying to find an excuse why the gtx 295 is slower than the ati. its simply slower ati won this round. try to live with it or forget about it. the 5970 has an advantage that no nvidia card has. it gives a fuck about antialaising. all games run the same on 8xAA and no AA and this is something that nvidia will never beat. i actually was a nvidia fan boy but after ive seen the 5970 im pro ati
puelladeluxe 2 years ago
the gtx is a year older than the 5970, how can you expect the gtx 295 to out perform the NEWER card?
jacobts 2 years ago
Comment removed
fuelofmilo 2 years ago
not much older but deffinitely a generation behinde of the new ati..
Vleesball 2 years ago
The " Nvidia optimized" is bullshit, the only engine that has true optimization is source engine for ati. We all know that you are talking about crysis too
Lesson333 2 years ago
nvidia is more faster because Resident Evil 5 is otmizade for nvidia grafics cards
wesker1994 2 years ago
You're right In almost every game the nvidia logo comes in the beginning
vlekietwinie 2 years ago
nvidia owned
Leetless1337 2 years ago
That may be true, but the monitor doesnt produce the images the way our eyes see. If you wave your hand in front of your face, do you see every detail on your skin, no. Our brain and eyes blur images together, but computers have to produce single "still" images that can be paused at any moment, and everything would be clear as day, even the truck racing by you at 240 miles per hour. This motion blur makes everything we see much smoother, and life-like.We compensate for it with faster frame rates
KbApimp007 2 years ago
lol waiting for ur Fermi...good luck
SoleGFXTube 2 years ago
WHOAH!!!
archucky 2 years ago
the HD5970 is a fucking monster
bodebrutal 2 years ago 6
i think that 5970 is more faster because it hasnt colors hahahhahahh
guderiancol 2 years ago
i think nvidia is faster becouse it doesnt have any other colur than black
qludse 2 years ago
The color of the card doesn't prove anything. It's what's inside the card that matters.
vangstaz 2 years ago
lol ati in that video hasnt color, watch...
guderiancol 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the GTX 280 will be better than the HD5970!
xxGSSDxx 2 years ago
if you mean the 380. of course it will be.
the card is made months later. nvidia has all the tim in the world to improve their fermi cards just in order to beat the 5970. what it will cost is the true question
yusthavinfun 2 years ago
oh mand, shut, the, fuck, UP
ffs how many morons i'll still have to reply with those fking "wait for 300 series"? --"
Czyerx 2 years ago
sorry i mean the 380 GTX
xxGSSDxx 2 years ago
xxGSSDxx <--- n00b
Jefneurotoxin 2 years ago
Comment removed
xxGSSDxx 2 years ago
haha you're so bad!
xxGSSDxx 2 years ago
What is the song from 0:13 to 0:43?
wrifraff 2 years ago
2:05 watch the guy in the rigth spot, with 295 has a red shirt with 5970 there is not color lol,
guderiancol 2 years ago 2
2:13 these 3 zombies are using diferent colors too haha
seusgordo 2 years ago
THE HD59** ROOOOCKKS!! And see for example how good the single GPU 5870's are doing versus the GTX295 dual GPU!
MegaMaxCorp 2 years ago