@oromogrl Saying is the same as saying "i believe you are idiot, because me saying that is a proof of it".. makes no sence does it? Thou it could make some sence in your case...
There is a basic flaw in your narrative. You assume that there is a continuous path that leads from the fundamental particles to life. Yet life forms on earth do not generate their complexity from scratch (the quantum realm). They inherit it from their predecessors and build upon it their own complexity . I believe that the first minimally complex thing arrived from outer space as proposed by the panspermia theory.
If your three fundamental particles didn't already have all those properties which gave all those consequences, these consequences could only be explained by magic. Your challenge against creationists are to show that those particles didn't need a creator to get those properties. Thus, this was a rather poor contribution to fight creationalists; not that I claim this is what you tried. Before you try again I suggest you do some rational philosophy studieS.
This clearly shows how life can be formed 3 basic fundementail, and scientifical particles. As we study the Big Bang and our origins, we learn how these and other particles were created in the very small amount of time during inflation. The thing is, creationists will always have a fall back, because their is such a thing as a stupid question, they cant accept that we as scientists must accept certain things to be finite and true.
Also creationists will have some question to ask. Even if we solve the Big Bang, and String Theory works out, they will say "\Where did all this Energy come from?" and all Physicists will face-palm so hard they will probably bash their skulls in. As humans we learn through observations and experiments, their is no point in even asking what is before the Big Bang, because their was no before, their wasn't even time. Also if you are having issues with creationists, to to Poholer54
@OneAlphaAi, first of all, I want you to see me as the Devil's advocate.
Your claim time came to excistence with big bang is equally satisfying as claiming god always excisted to an objection what was before god.
Yet again you have shown beyond reasonable doubt that your critical senses are basically at the same level as the religous. Your "god" is just another flavor. You obviously not interessted in the truth, but to pick on religious people in a way you think is reasonable, but isn't.
@Vocalallusive I can clearly see your point, but the fact remains that even if a higher being did exist, none of the religions are even close toward understanding him. Its plain human ignorance to think we are perfect, that we would be crafted in the image of perfection. And this thinking has stunned human progression for years as the Church silenced any scientific discovery that opposed this view.
@Vocalallusive Furthermore I will not go into the God argument becuase its based off a false premise that if something cannot be disproven then it must stand true, regardless. I am not here to fight every religion but t ask people to be less ignorant, the God concept has lead to wars, that in my opinion would have already happened, and I think within the next 100 - 200 we will see the fall of religions as science takes us much closer to understanding not only the Big Bang, but how existence...
...is possilbe without a God controlling everything. I am not only talking about the Big Bang but our fundamental understanding of particle physics and the 4 elementary forces that govern our world. Sadly because the human mind is limited it fails to understand the laws of physics, many are an exception to this. People keep asking what is before the Big bang, their must have been something? And then they say "O God, it was God who set this up, he just didn't mention it.
@OneAlphaAi You clearly didnt study anything nor even watched full line of cassiopeiaproject movies, it shows one of the theories and etc, just watch them, then you will see that your statement is sort of absurd, taken into point as you say "if science can solve it"...
hehe, based on what can you come to that conclusion? I have a greater understanding of this more then you, watch 10th dimensional blogs, read Micho kaku's books, or even actually study what this animation is teaching you. You just watch this videos and your like "wow I am now a physics genius". These videos are amazing, but your own self research is required moron. The internet can teach, but research leads to understanding.
You really nailed it in the end of this documentary trying to explain what is conscience? thats is something very fascinating! And thanks for the vid!
@oromogrl could you elaborate? I have heard that some folk subscribe to the notion of science and god not being mutually exclusive, but in my personal experiance I have found the contrary. I welcome your response..peace
@oromogrl Don't really see god being brought into this...life is amazing and the way simple rules and a few building blocks can and do evolve is breathtaking..peace.
Its not about the plants, your organism highly depends on bacterias. For example they help (a lot) with digesting food. If you lost all bacterias from your body you probably wouldn't wake up tomorrow. Skin infections, viruses, lack of energy (digesting problems :) and much, much more would kill you long before even one leaf would dry up. :)
I didn't say that humans are worthless, we are just unimportant. :)
@sidewaysfcs0718 "thats cus we are at the top of the food chain ...we are only consumers ..we dont actually contribute to anything on this planet :D"
Try telling that to a hungry brown bear while he's on a camping trip with his son and runs into some hikers.
Wow, what sweeping proclamations from such limited knowledge! No brain or thing in the universe is more complex than the human brain? Only the human animal has consciousness? I guess that would mean that the definition of consciousness has been redefined to make sure no other animal fits the description. By the way, the main characters of the videos were so poorly done they took away from the effectiveness of the videos. They almost made me quit watching a couple of times. Good videos otherwise.
Thanks for posting. I love you all. Be well.
wmbraddy 3 weeks ago in playlist Reality
Amazing!
237Michael 4 months ago
Ol' girl's avatar.. gots booty for dayyyyys
aut0turret 9 months ago
WTF ending???
FluffyBunniesOnFire 9 months ago 3
The big bang was an expansion, not an explosion, because explosions need space to explode in.
Lucuskane 11 months ago
Comment removed
Lucuskane 11 months ago
@oromogrl Saying is the same as saying "i believe you are idiot, because me saying that is a proof of it".. makes no sence does it? Thou it could make some sence in your case...
truethera 1 year ago
please like if you agree the cartoons are fucking annoying
purpleproductionftw 1 year ago
@OneAlphaAi, no, it doesn't clearly show any such thing. You've got even poorer critical sense than most religious people.
You're not even able to oppose my objection, but babling away with your pre-programmed rant.
Vocalallusive 1 year ago
There is a basic flaw in your narrative. You assume that there is a continuous path that leads from the fundamental particles to life. Yet life forms on earth do not generate their complexity from scratch (the quantum realm). They inherit it from their predecessors and build upon it their own complexity . I believe that the first minimally complex thing arrived from outer space as proposed by the panspermia theory.
gzajicek20 1 year ago
If your three fundamental particles didn't already have all those properties which gave all those consequences, these consequences could only be explained by magic. Your challenge against creationists are to show that those particles didn't need a creator to get those properties. Thus, this was a rather poor contribution to fight creationalists; not that I claim this is what you tried. Before you try again I suggest you do some rational philosophy studieS.
Vocalallusive 1 year ago
@Vocalallusive
are you a moron?
This clearly shows how life can be formed 3 basic fundementail, and scientifical particles. As we study the Big Bang and our origins, we learn how these and other particles were created in the very small amount of time during inflation. The thing is, creationists will always have a fall back, because their is such a thing as a stupid question, they cant accept that we as scientists must accept certain things to be finite and true.
OneAlphaAi 1 year ago
@Vocalallusive
Also creationists will have some question to ask. Even if we solve the Big Bang, and String Theory works out, they will say "\Where did all this Energy come from?" and all Physicists will face-palm so hard they will probably bash their skulls in. As humans we learn through observations and experiments, their is no point in even asking what is before the Big Bang, because their was no before, their wasn't even time. Also if you are having issues with creationists, to to Poholer54
OneAlphaAi 1 year ago
@OneAlphaAi, first of all, I want you to see me as the Devil's advocate.
Your claim time came to excistence with big bang is equally satisfying as claiming god always excisted to an objection what was before god.
Yet again you have shown beyond reasonable doubt that your critical senses are basically at the same level as the religous. Your "god" is just another flavor. You obviously not interessted in the truth, but to pick on religious people in a way you think is reasonable, but isn't.
Vocalallusive 1 year ago
@Vocalallusive I can clearly see your point, but the fact remains that even if a higher being did exist, none of the religions are even close toward understanding him. Its plain human ignorance to think we are perfect, that we would be crafted in the image of perfection. And this thinking has stunned human progression for years as the Church silenced any scientific discovery that opposed this view.
OneAlphaAi 1 year ago
@Vocalallusive Furthermore I will not go into the God argument becuase its based off a false premise that if something cannot be disproven then it must stand true, regardless. I am not here to fight every religion but t ask people to be less ignorant, the God concept has lead to wars, that in my opinion would have already happened, and I think within the next 100 - 200 we will see the fall of religions as science takes us much closer to understanding not only the Big Bang, but how existence...
OneAlphaAi 1 year ago
@Vocalallusive
...is possilbe without a God controlling everything. I am not only talking about the Big Bang but our fundamental understanding of particle physics and the 4 elementary forces that govern our world. Sadly because the human mind is limited it fails to understand the laws of physics, many are an exception to this. People keep asking what is before the Big bang, their must have been something? And then they say "O God, it was God who set this up, he just didn't mention it.
OneAlphaAi 1 year ago
@OneAlphaAi You clearly didnt study anything nor even watched full line of cassiopeiaproject movies, it shows one of the theories and etc, just watch them, then you will see that your statement is sort of absurd, taken into point as you say "if science can solve it"...
truethera 1 year ago
@truethera
hehe, based on what can you come to that conclusion? I have a greater understanding of this more then you, watch 10th dimensional blogs, read Micho kaku's books, or even actually study what this animation is teaching you. You just watch this videos and your like "wow I am now a physics genius". These videos are amazing, but your own self research is required moron. The internet can teach, but research leads to understanding.
OneAlphaAi 1 year ago
@truethera
any way I am not going to fight an internet troll, go read a book and don't rely on videos for all your knowledge. Expand your horizons.
OneAlphaAi 1 year ago
@OneAlphaAi
Yeah, because books are just so much better than videos.
Ender1337otron 4 months ago
I was with her last light in your truck ;D
gvsfgdf 1 year ago
You really nailed it in the end of this documentary trying to explain what is conscience? thats is something very fascinating! And thanks for the vid!
vivaramones 1 year ago
I can't see how any of this is evidence for a God. It's very likely that all of this is simply caused by natural means.
Ecite 1 year ago
@oromogrl could you elaborate? I have heard that some folk subscribe to the notion of science and god not being mutually exclusive, but in my personal experiance I have found the contrary. I welcome your response..peace
MasterOhSo 2 years ago
@oromogrl Don't really see god being brought into this...life is amazing and the way simple rules and a few building blocks can and do evolve is breathtaking..peace.
MasterOhSo 2 years ago
but dont they dominate? by biomass arent there more single celled simple organisms than complex ones?
bobojr456 2 years ago
no i think plants are the dominant biomass ....i mean ..they pretty much cover the planet ^^
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
"In terms of numbers, bacteria are by far the most numerous of organisms on Earth. They also make up most of the living biomass on Earth."
source: h t t p :// astrobiology. nasa. gov/ ask-an-astrobiologist/question /?id=203
bobojr456 2 years ago
well i said i think plants where ..i wasnt sure ...and guess i was wrong .. so yay bacteria?
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
If humans disapeared from this planet, 99.9% of other living organisms wouldn't even notice the "loss".
If all bacterias suddenly disapeared from this planet, most of the spieces, including humans, would die in a matter of hours.
So... YAY BACTERIA! :D
Vejita12 2 years ago
thats cus we are at the top of the food chain ...we are only consumers ..we dont actually contribute to anything on this planet :D
bacteries are pretty much the building blocks of nature ..without them theres no more plants ...without plants bye bye animals and humans :D
this doesnt mean we humans are worthless.
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
Its not about the plants, your organism highly depends on bacterias. For example they help (a lot) with digesting food. If you lost all bacterias from your body you probably wouldn't wake up tomorrow. Skin infections, viruses, lack of energy (digesting problems :) and much, much more would kill you long before even one leaf would dry up. :)
I didn't say that humans are worthless, we are just unimportant. :)
Vejita12 2 years ago
i know i know ..
actualy importance doesnt exist ..its a human concept ..we are just intelligent enough to give value to things :)
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@sidewaysfcs0718 "thats cus we are at the top of the food chain ...we are only consumers ..we dont actually contribute to anything on this planet :D"
Try telling that to a hungry brown bear while he's on a camping trip with his son and runs into some hikers.
mikeroephonics 1 year ago
I suggest everyone interested into the complex behaviour of systems with simple rules to take a further look into cellular automatas.
MrCalhoun 2 years ago
I love these videos. Thanks alot!
krrcan 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thanks again 0(*_*)0
ringnebula6767 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow, what sweeping proclamations from such limited knowledge! No brain or thing in the universe is more complex than the human brain? Only the human animal has consciousness? I guess that would mean that the definition of consciousness has been redefined to make sure no other animal fits the description. By the way, the main characters of the videos were so poorly done they took away from the effectiveness of the videos. They almost made me quit watching a couple of times. Good videos otherwise.
unseenstrings 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Very clear, very informative, extremely well done!!
purposefirst 3 years ago