273whp for a stage2 STI?!? Should be almost breaking 300whp. You got 91 gas and a off the shelf tune for that? I'm breaking 420whp on that dyno with a 20g on a stock WRX block. Seriously get a custom tune for that car, you'll thank me. The potential from the new IHI VF48 is well over 300whp with the right supporting mods.
Yeah it really does come down to the dyno. The mustang ones are alot tougher then the dynojets. Well if you're making 60whp over stock that's impressive with a turboback and an cobbs stage 2 tune. Get a pro tune done when you change your TMIC :)
nice, shealth approach there? factory catback? If you don't mind the noise you will definitely pick up something getting ride of the factory catback depending on the model. The older WRX's definitely picked up a lot getting ride of the factory catback.
Yay, stock an evo 10 beats an 09 STi. Would you like a fucking cookie? All the companies that have built they're STI's and EVO X's, have had a similar result.
The STI beats the living shit out of the EVO on the track. Teins video is great, the driver is one of the top drivers in japan and he goes on about what a piece of shit the EVO is.
who the hell keeps either of these cars bone stock? Seriously, when 200 dollar downpipes are adding 30whp, it's hardly fair to compare bone stock to bone stock. the EVO X is making close to 400whp with boltons, and the STI's factory turbo is quite good (the vf48). Both of these cars can make over 500whp on the stock internals with the right turbo. Both are scary SCARY fast for the money. EVO's seem to have the edge in chassis dynamics while i'd argue the subaru motor has more potential.
The Evo's interior is all cheap and plastic. The STi is the best combination of speed, interior space, and usability. If you only have one car, I will chose an STi. Evo's suck btw... ROFL...
You have no idea what you're talking about buddy. A Evo will eat your ass up. I bet you don't even know who Dave Buscher is. Evo's are light years ahead of shitty ass Sti's, and you're just upset because they're more souped up. STI'S SUCK!
interiors are crap in the new EVO X, it's unfortunate. I took one from a test drive and I was pratically pulling the interior appart with my bare hands. Yeah, it was that flimsy.
Nice dude, I get my tune there next week. i also bought your recaros :)
CVlaxstar 1 year ago
273whp for a stage2 STI?!? Should be almost breaking 300whp. You got 91 gas and a off the shelf tune for that? I'm breaking 420whp on that dyno with a 20g on a stock WRX block. Seriously get a custom tune for that car, you'll thank me. The potential from the new IHI VF48 is well over 300whp with the right supporting mods.
ethosflux 2 years ago
Maybe on a Dynojet, not on a Mustang dyno. Stock 08+ cars only put down ~ 215 on this dyno.
th1rd3y3 2 years ago
Yeah it really does come down to the dyno. The mustang ones are alot tougher then the dynojets. Well if you're making 60whp over stock that's impressive with a turboback and an cobbs stage 2 tune. Get a pro tune done when you change your TMIC :)
ethosflux 2 years ago
Thats about right. I am putting down 282 whp with an invidia catless dp and factory catback with a pro tune.
chefelvis123 2 years ago
nice, shealth approach there? factory catback? If you don't mind the noise you will definitely pick up something getting ride of the factory catback depending on the model. The older WRX's definitely picked up a lot getting ride of the factory catback.
ethosflux 2 years ago
Yay, stock an evo 10 beats an 09 STi. Would you like a fucking cookie? All the companies that have built they're STI's and EVO X's, have had a similar result.
The STI beats the living shit out of the EVO on the track. Teins video is great, the driver is one of the top drivers in japan and he goes on about what a piece of shit the EVO is.
bugeyeturbo 2 years ago
who the hell keeps either of these cars bone stock? Seriously, when 200 dollar downpipes are adding 30whp, it's hardly fair to compare bone stock to bone stock. the EVO X is making close to 400whp with boltons, and the STI's factory turbo is quite good (the vf48). Both of these cars can make over 500whp on the stock internals with the right turbo. Both are scary SCARY fast for the money. EVO's seem to have the edge in chassis dynamics while i'd argue the subaru motor has more potential.
ethosflux 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a POS! Everyone knows the Evo10 is soooo much better than the new Sti. Who the hell would buy a car that got its design from a Mazda 3?
twenty5psi 2 years ago
The Evo's interior is all cheap and plastic. The STi is the best combination of speed, interior space, and usability. If you only have one car, I will chose an STi. Evo's suck btw... ROFL...
chefelvis123 2 years ago 2
You have no idea what you're talking about buddy. A Evo will eat your ass up. I bet you don't even know who Dave Buscher is. Evo's are light years ahead of shitty ass Sti's, and you're just upset because they're more souped up. STI'S SUCK!
twenty5psi 2 years ago
Oh please! You probably don't even own an Evo! Go back to trolling in your sweet cavalier!
th1rd3y3 2 years ago
Cavalier? No thanks, I'd rather walk! I'm sorry you spent 100k on a car that can't even compete with the almighty 4g63!
twenty5psi 2 years ago
hahahaaaaa
hey 93 cavs are legit lol jk
yoshman139 2 years ago
interiors are crap in the new EVO X, it's unfortunate. I took one from a test drive and I was pratically pulling the interior appart with my bare hands. Yeah, it was that flimsy.
ethosflux 2 years ago
stupid
AntowQa 2 years ago