How very true that Liu Bei and Cao Cao were the only two "true" heros back then. Heros of chaos dont have to have amazing martial skills, or be the genius like Zhuge Liang, but needs to have the leadership skills and that conviction of kings. Cao Cao is good I consider Liu Bei the ultimate hero, because he started with nothing except his persona that attracted people like Zhao Yun and Zhuge Liang.
lol True but you would be more amaze if you read a book that talk about Cacao's period of time. It was a history book. From the look of things and by comparison, i think Caocao has even worst start and a lot of set back than liubei and even more amazing how he fought and became the wei King. (King is not emperor, for idiot below who doesn't know what the chinese title meant)
personaly i like cao cao better , every book of three kingdoms display cao cao to the evil part,but in really history he is a really hero. liubei is just a gal , dont think he can even creates shu without zhuge liang.
To a good extend I have to agree with this. He is extremely clever and cunning, only that he suffer from a bit of paranoia, this tend to be the case with similar personalities in history. I dislike how Luo Guanzhong over-villianize Tsao Tsao or atleast makes him seem more 'evil' compared to other characters.
in real history, cao cao is a villain because he pursue the king capital move from luoyang to xuyang but why , because he will have the emperor alone so he can addicated the throne and that is a national offence. so aikakakakaka fucking think before you speak so fuck off and be a asshole, liu bei is the only hero and sun quan is not bad so fuck off
HOLD YOUR TONGUE! READ THE BOOK OR HISTORICALLY CORRECTLY BEFORE YOU MAKE SUCH A STATEMENT. FIrst of all, emperor was in a bad position anyway. He was in the struggle between the two badass generals struggling to control over emperor. I would rather Caocao take the emperor rather than those two. Those two deceased bustard dong zhou's men. 2nd, he never abdicated the throne. Understand what the title he wears means! Idiot! 3rd he did bring prosperity to his people So dont write him off like that!
@mzrkyh08 Sun Quan not bad? He massacred as much or even more people than Cao Cao, Sun Quan also murdered/executed a bunch of officials and people who he thought were threats to the succession of his crown prince. Overall, Sun Quan is as cruel as Cao Cao or even worse. Liu Bei is also cruel and wrong, he took Yi Zhou from Liu Zhang in a wrong manner. For what? His own cause. china would have been better off if Cao Cao united it.
@mzrkyh08 You stupid? Cao Cao did probably have intentions in forcing the abdication AFTER HE UNITED CHINA. Cao Cao moved the capital to Xu Chang, and conquered 7/10 or 3/4 of China. He couldv'e just become Emperor than, NO ONE could've stopped him. Emperor Xie was just a puppet emperor, and was of no use. The citizens benefited from Cao Cao's rule and did not mind if he became Emperor. All Liu Bei did was prolong the chaos in China. Sun Quan is a cruel person and Liu Bei in history.
@mzrkyh08 BTW the capital was at Chang An, but Cao Cao defeated Li Jue and Guo Si and moved the capital to Xu Chang so he can secure the emperor in a well defended and economic base.
今天下英雄维使君与曹耳！！
lmaginations 1 year ago
Great scene. The quality of this video is so good!
serpentdoness 3 years ago 5
How very true that Liu Bei and Cao Cao were the only two "true" heros back then. Heros of chaos dont have to have amazing martial skills, or be the genius like Zhuge Liang, but needs to have the leadership skills and that conviction of kings. Cao Cao is good I consider Liu Bei the ultimate hero, because he started with nothing except his persona that attracted people like Zhao Yun and Zhuge Liang.
Violets2Ashes 3 years ago 4
lol True but you would be more amaze if you read a book that talk about Cacao's period of time. It was a history book. From the look of things and by comparison, i think Caocao has even worst start and a lot of set back than liubei and even more amazing how he fought and became the wei King. (King is not emperor, for idiot below who doesn't know what the chinese title meant)
Onegaifriends 2 years ago
Possibly my favorite scene from the novel. ^_^
BraceForEpic 3 years ago 5
personaly i like cao cao better , every book of three kingdoms display cao cao to the evil part,but in really history he is a really hero. liubei is just a gal , dont think he can even creates shu without zhuge liang.
aikakakakaka 4 years ago
To a good extend I have to agree with this. He is extremely clever and cunning, only that he suffer from a bit of paranoia, this tend to be the case with similar personalities in history. I dislike how Luo Guanzhong over-villianize Tsao Tsao or atleast makes him seem more 'evil' compared to other characters.
eksasol 4 years ago 2
in real history, cao cao is a villain because he pursue the king capital move from luoyang to xuyang but why , because he will have the emperor alone so he can addicated the throne and that is a national offence. so aikakakakaka fucking think before you speak so fuck off and be a asshole, liu bei is the only hero and sun quan is not bad so fuck off
mzrkyh08 4 years ago
Not really,Cao Cao did much better at protecting the people of the Han Kingdom compared to the previous two emperor's of Han before Han Xian Di.
Jaber1891 3 years ago
HOLD YOUR TONGUE! READ THE BOOK OR HISTORICALLY CORRECTLY BEFORE YOU MAKE SUCH A STATEMENT. FIrst of all, emperor was in a bad position anyway. He was in the struggle between the two badass generals struggling to control over emperor. I would rather Caocao take the emperor rather than those two. Those two deceased bustard dong zhou's men. 2nd, he never abdicated the throne. Understand what the title he wears means! Idiot! 3rd he did bring prosperity to his people So dont write him off like that!
Onegaifriends 2 years ago
Fuck that. Yellow Turbans were completely right in the first place, yo. D:
krkrkrkrkrkrkrkrkrkx 2 years ago
@mzrkyh08 Sun Quan not bad? He massacred as much or even more people than Cao Cao, Sun Quan also murdered/executed a bunch of officials and people who he thought were threats to the succession of his crown prince. Overall, Sun Quan is as cruel as Cao Cao or even worse. Liu Bei is also cruel and wrong, he took Yi Zhou from Liu Zhang in a wrong manner. For what? His own cause. china would have been better off if Cao Cao united it.
mrbeate 1 year ago
@mzrkyh08 You stupid? Cao Cao did probably have intentions in forcing the abdication AFTER HE UNITED CHINA. Cao Cao moved the capital to Xu Chang, and conquered 7/10 or 3/4 of China. He couldv'e just become Emperor than, NO ONE could've stopped him. Emperor Xie was just a puppet emperor, and was of no use. The citizens benefited from Cao Cao's rule and did not mind if he became Emperor. All Liu Bei did was prolong the chaos in China. Sun Quan is a cruel person and Liu Bei in history.
mrbeate 1 year ago
@mzrkyh08 BTW the capital was at Chang An, but Cao Cao defeated Li Jue and Guo Si and moved the capital to Xu Chang so he can secure the emperor in a well defended and economic base.
mrbeate 1 year ago
this is an excellent representation of what true heroes think heroes should be.
sct1201 4 years ago 2
Liu and Cao are both heros!!
cocolucky 4 years ago 4
This is just like in the book.
Fu6344 4 years ago
I wonder if they will put a scene like this in a Dynasty Warriors game. I think there was a cut scene similar to this in Dynasty Warriors 5.
sojiro856 3 years ago
Yeah it was in DW5,, It's called the two heroes
Monkgangsta 2 years ago
A nice trick of Liu Bei so Cao Cao will underestimate him
enche94rich 5 years ago 3