@severrnijKGU and not only died, but these kinds of antics could've jeopardized further "moon missions". in earth's gravity with the almost "immediate" protection of an emt or a doc, the astronauts are told not to hop, skip or jump. but they could in moon's gravity and be so sure that they couldn't in any way hurt themselves with no obvious assistance of any medic. these could be the world's craziest videos!
@NASAvsPETE Hey an amateur ham guy, we have lots of HAM enthususiasts at the Cloudy Nights astronomy forum... Stop by over at CN and lets continue any absurd conspiracy contentions you might have there! That way we can talk science instead of ridiculous Youtube interjection. That way any and all NONSENSE like seeen here can be properly squashed by sound minds. And hey, if you are right scientifically you will have the full support of the group, no doubt about it.
The United Nations organisation constantly receiving dozens of e mails daily demanding the launch of an investigation with the subject of the "moon landings" by the American military allegedly taken place in the middle of the last century.Even with the certain knowledge the UN is probably the closest thing to a micky mouse political organization, is good to see the free thinking people of the Earth take some action against the American crooks.
@potrodsas LOL, you are obviously part of the punk ass problem. I can see where moon landings would be hard to believe coming from where you do.
As I keep telling you immature conspiracy rats (and still no takers after atleast 3 years), join a science group and try your lame thinking process there, you will be quickly and thoroughly clowned by people with educations. Fuck the conspiracy nuts, hang them all!
@nesokretep Yea I let my word hole get the best of me sometimes.. just where this sort of subject matter is concerned. I have teenagers of my own who 'get it' so its frustrating to come here and see 14 year olds like realdrummer with empty mad claims and absolutely nothing to back them but foul language.
This subject would actually be fun to debate if it held any weight at all, no bad language needed.
when I was on elementary school...I laughed a lot when I saw this video...now I'm on university and I still laughing at this vid...thanks the gods that we went to the moon...
even with the spacesuit weight he still feels like he weighs half as usual so hopping upright is still possible. at four seconds he gets one foot caught under the other. in clearing his jam he ejects sand farther than i think possible for earth, the only video that i have ever seen that might really be on the Moon.
lol, I love how that, despite all the rigorous training and education required to even be considered for a moon mission, many astronauts can't help but act/look like toddlers on a playground once they get there. AWESOME!
@420Kasper420 Considering the uneven, dusty ground, the weak gravity and the clumsy, stiff spacesuits, it was fantastic that they didn't fall more often
This isn't funny, I like to see you wear a suit that on Earth weighs 300 pounds, even with the moon's low gravity it's still pretty heavy, plus they where in space for many days so the aren't use to having any gravity at all.
@EGMAG You are wrong for a multitude of reasons. First, fly-systems in movies do not use metallic wires. They use ropes. The reason for this is safety. A wire under tension is a deadly thing should it ever snap. A rope? Not so much. Secondly, ropes are non-reflective which is a good thing to have on a movie set. What you see here is sunlight reflecting off the backpack airlock frame. Moron.
@EGMAG One other thing to consider is that what you are seeing is not even metal but simply white fabric. On a clear day sunlight on snow can be particulalry blinding. How much moreso would sunlight, undiluted through an atmosphere, be on the white fabric of the life support systems? As I said, you're a fucking moron. Instead of looking at what is probable you believe bullshit conspiracy theories.
@EGMAG That's not a wire gleaming. It's his radio antenna. Check on the Net (Wikipedia for example), for the layout of the moonsuits. There You will see it's just an antenna! It's better to search for facts before You are shouting "FAKE!". Otherwise you'll risk to look ignorant...
forget the antenna. the antenna is very obvius. the howdee doody wire is there and is almost hidden. There are multitudes of howdee doodie wire bouncing astro examples all over the internet so wake up and stop fucking around like childish imbeciles who see the truth and call it a lie. idiots.
@EGMAG OK. Tell me where I can see this "multitudes of examples" where one can actually SEE the wires, and also how they are fastened to the spacesuits...
The wires can't be black; then they would clearly show up against the surface. And if they were grey, they would show up aginst the sky. Because they would be VERY bright lit...
Another thing conspiracy freaks fail to take into account. If this had been filmed in a studio, how did they manage to light up sqaure miles of landscape with one light source. Just to light a lousy little one acre baseball field takes dozens of high output stadium lights positioned all around the field. Funny, I don't see one single studio light, anywhere. Sorry, but this was filmed 230,000 plus miles away on on the moon in SUNLIGHT!!!
@MaryOMackie All system power on the Apollo LM was supplied via batteries. Original designs called for use of a fuel cell but those were later scrapped during development. Since they were in the dead of space they didn't need air conditioning. What they needed was heat which was supplied by the batteries.
they were pretty rugged, built to take 120000 mph micro meteorite impacts,one reason the apollo 17 astronauts fell down so much was because the suits weighed alot more then previous missions. they were on the moon for 71 hours compared to the 2 1/2 hours for apollo 11.
This is proof that this is real if you look closely at the sand when the fall it keeps moving in the same direction which is a newton law of physics in a vacuum it will keep moving put on the moon it moves farther than someone who kick sand
Nope. you don't see any "dust carried by the wind" at 0.04. In fact, the dust particules kicked up by the astronaut, moving in a near-perfect parabola shows the effect of the vaccum pretty well. Remember, it'll go 6 times as far on the moon as a similar kick will do on Earth just because of the lower gravity. And farther because of the LACK of air.
We obviously had the equipment & launch vehicles to go to the moon. Everybody saw the lift-offs.
So you are telling me that the moon dust travelling like that when kicked would not travel the same if I was to kick a lump of wet sand on earth? It would look exactly the same, thats because this video was shot on earth. If this was on the moon the sand 'moon dust' would 6 times lighter than 'earth dust' so it should remain in the air longer and float to moon like a feather.
Just admit it, its bullshit, and you know it deep down.
OK. I'll tell you tthat I just did several physical tests.
Most of those shots are not long enough to see the dust go up and then all the way back down again, so it appears that it might be moving faster than it is.
But in the ones that are long enough to see the dust fall all the way back down, it stayed up much longer than the pebbles that I just dropped from the same height.
You know, it probably would take more effort to fake it and keep the secret than to actually build the real thing and fly to the Moon. So I doubt it's bullshit.
Of course, you probably think Nick Gri££in is a real nationalist. He isn't. He's faker than the Moon landing conspiracies are.
Just google Griffinwatch to see what REAL nationalists think of him.
Poor Andrew Brons, having to work with that fat idiot. His fucking deputy is an MI5 agent. Did you not know this? Why do you think he's nicknamed "5Imon Darby"?
Great example of these guys, mostly pilots, trying to adapt to both restrictive suits and a different gravity. effin cowboys muckin' about! Wouldn't you be the same? Just pushing the limits... funny stuff.
Can all you people here tell me why would they fake 6 lunar landings?? 12 men have walked on the moon, 9 of which are still alive. If you were gonna fake it surely you'd just do it the once. And about 400,000 people worked to put man on the moon, from building the space suit to the landing crafts, if this was fake, surely some one would of come forward. Face it people your lives are dull, and now your just diminishing the great and amazing work of others.
It doesn't need wind you dick head, it has forward motion from the astronaut. If you through something in a vacuum it doesn't hit a wall, it carries forward with the velocity you've given it. Twat.
no, the mix of low gravity and no air resistance causes it to fly away pretty far, just give up on it, even sovjet agrees on the fact that they where to the moon, AND THEY SURE HAD SPIES!!!
00:09 The astronaut floated. If a feather and a hammer drop immediately at the same time during an experiment, how does the astronaut float? There is gravity on the moon. The dust kicked up by the lunar rover didn't float, so how is it the astronaut does? Wire?
Everything needs time to accelerate. If he jumped up a little, then his accelereration is towards the ground is negative, then becomes zero, and then goes positive.
It's a shame all the original tapes are missing, I guess someone recorded over the original with future missions. They looked for three years, and came up empty
Look carefully at 0:12 - 0:15, you can actually see the cable on the top of his backpack as he is being pulled back up onto his feet. The cable comes from somewhere above the "set" look for yourself and see the NASA footage itself proves the staging of this event. Watch how he rises and see he is being pulled, other footage shows the same effect.
Fake? Come on. Astronauts, NASA management, technicians, film crews, people who created the moon stages, directed the films, dealt with the outtakes, the scientific advisors who would have needed to be on hand to oversee every aspect of every bit of film, video or voice transmission to make it as authentic as possible. Surely some of these people (if not most of them) would have had a guilty conscience and picked up the phone and rung the Washington Post or NBC... surely.
Apparently the moon dust and silica was very abrasive; and many of the suits had small leaks by the end of the missions. The astronauts had to increase pressure in them to compensate.
man can you blevie it people 1,000 years ago looking into the moon and it was impossblie for them to get there and look at us almost 40 years ago we went amzaning what man can do
@One1Ali u shouldn't be saying this is true (moon landing), before u call me a fagget, or a communist, and before u say the moon landnign is true study the ven allen, and why are there no objets on the moon right now that the apollo missions supustly left there
@Chicken1397 YOU should study the van Allen belts. They are NOT lethal, or very hazardouz to just pass through and don't stay in them, just like an X-ray is not lethal if You don't stay in the X-ray machine for a long time. And, there IS equipment left there. Haven't You heard of the laser reflectors still in use to measure the Moons increasing distance? Also, the lunar satellites have photographed the landing sites with LEM's, Rovers and tracks on the ground.
@YDDES --Also, the lunar satellites have photographed the landing sites with LEM's, Rovers and tracks on the ground --
Have you really seen such a pictures? Can you post web sites where we can see LEM wreckages, flags, rovers and other stuff left on the moon, taken from satellites today? That would be great!! If they really exists........
@1965christian Search for "NASA - LRO Sees Apollo Landing Sites", for example. I haven't said one see any flags, but the LEM's and tracks from the Rovers and even astronaut footpaths are easily seen on several photographs. But, of course, those who don't want to believe that man has been on the Moon, will just say the pictures are fake.
Of course; It's a matter of scientific ingenuity, hard work, courage and dedication
only for the earth orbits, never a moonwalk. You see moonwalk claims are a multi-trillion yearly business in all sorts of media. How could the money chasers refuse such huge amounts of income unless they vigorously uphold a moon walk story? COMMERCIALIZATION of the Yankee taxpayers dollars!
Someone suggested to me that this was a practise film in the NASA hangar. And that on the moon, when the crew spotted and in turn challenged by the aliens, the practise clips were substituted in while actual events took a turn. Is that at all possible?
despite the fact that i'm russian, i'm proud of that whole expedition, and generally those guys are more than heroes, cause they were potential deadmen. i think despite that it's america, technologies were insecure at that time..
This you know can be taken as another disinformation exercise to discourage a more closer look at the moon landings and why certain tapes of NASA remain lost and not available to the public domain.
The people who ask questions are getting too close to the truth for those responsible to encourage juvenile tactics of responses.
While the moon landing looked legit to me, too many anomalies abound to prompt the birth of conspiracies theories. :)
You can look at any footage of anything and find the same sort of "anomalies". I'm thinking of applying the moon hoax believer method to the footage of my son's last soccer match to prove it was all faked. Look at the wires holding that ball up! Why doesn't the ball knock his head off? Who is that grownup with the whistle, the film director? They appear to change direction halfway through-that doesn't make sense! The goalie kicks it straight to the opposition-was he paid off? Oh,the dumbness.
Most of the 'anomolies' come from ignorance of an alien enviroment. Liek the classic 'Why no stars?' question. The answer is simple, it was daytime, and if you want a good picture of the lunar surface, which was what they were studying, the exposure time would be too short to capture stars. People assume because the sky is black, it's night. Actually, its black because there is no air. Ignorance, not anomolies create conspiricy theories.
What makes the Moon Hoax Believers tick? First and foremost...they want to sound smart. They want to feel important. They want to be respected. All day they carefully monitor their YT Hoax clips, and when they see one of their supporters chiming in, their heart skips a beat with joy. They absolutely beam with pride thinking they are taking on the Evil NASA Establishment and winning!!!! LOL!!! TOO funny. What a bunch of losers.
even if the whole moon thing was a hoax, is it really worth arguing about. in my eyes we wasted money that could have fed starving familes. and also, rocketfull+atmosphere= not good news.
depends how you look at things. I think space exploration and investing in the future is worth the cost. The Iraq war has used up about $2 trillion that could help families here. It all depends on how you look at it.
the moon landings were not a waste of money, the technology we have today, this very pc im typing on is all thanks to those moon landings, pushing the current technology to the limit. not a waste of money or time at all and some day mankind shall return, and this time to stay!!
You can't hide the fact that the average Moon Hoax Believer couldn't even locate a Physics textbook in a library...much less understand anything written in it.
FACT: Not a SINGLE SMART PERSON IN THE WORLD BELIEVES THE MOON HOAX. NONE, ZERO, NADA.
Only the marginally educated morons of the world believe the Hoax. Hoaxers...something is wrong with your picture. Can you guess what it is?
Every PhD SCIENTIST, ENGINEER and PROFESSOR in the world knows Apollo was an incredible feat. FACT!
ITS A HOAX!! FOOLS!! THE WORLD IS FLAT!!! DON'T LET THE GOVERNMENT FOOL YOU!!! THERE WERE NEVER DINOSUARS EITHER!! THE GODS ON MOUNT OLYMPUS ARE JUSTY MESSING WITH YOUR MINDS!! and elvis is living on mars with marylin munroe bigfoot is their pet, and JFK is the mayor of the colony on mars. I forget anything? I am not wearing my tinfoil hat so the alien mind controll probes sometimes make me forget things.
And before anyone sends a reply that involves travel to "space" with space shuttle, ISS, etc. -- That is not SPACE -- Manned vehicles can only travel in Earth's atmosphere. The shuttle and the ISS are 250 miles above Earth's surface. Take a look at a globe and you'll find out how incredibly close to the planet that is. Shuttle and ISS are in the thermosphere. NOT SPACE --There is no such thing as a "Space Walk". It is in "reality" a "high atmosphere walk". -- "True science" class dismissed.
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. -- The science no one wants to let out is that space is the opposite of our ocean. Take a trip down in our ocean and you get compression. Eventually, anything with an air pocket will crush; instantly. Space is the exact opposite.'Decompression'. Anything with an air pocket will decompress; instantly.(ergo) Humans will never be able to travel off this planet to the moon or anywhere else. Only machines can be sent to space or deep ocean.
THEY ARE IN A VACUUM! ALSO NOTE THE VERTICAL ACCLERATION IS SLOWER WHY? THE GRAVITY IS LESS 1.62m/s2, it's 9.81m/s2 on earth. GO READ A BOOK ON BASIC PHYSICS, VERY BASIC PHYSICS.
you do realize a feather will drop like a stone if there is no air, the moon has no air, therefore its impossible for the dust to float as it does. air has nothing to do with it
Of course I know that, I have a physics major. The dust is not floating, the kicked up dust has a perfect parabolic movement. They are in a vacuum, they are in much less gravity than earth, they are on the moon full stop.
lol then why are we argueing if we both agree? oh sorry, you were trying to make yourself look like a genious from my first post as you thought i believed in a hoax.
Crazy...I don't care if a certain % of the population is stupid enough to believe the Hoax. I just fret young kids being bombarded by this Hoax crap and tending to believe it. A 8 or 10 year old tends to believe anything an adult tells him. If JUST ONE youngster believes this Hoax Porn and becomes turned off from space, science and tech pursuits...that will be a tragedy IMO. Before the net, the Tards just stayed at home and watched MTV. Now they defecate on the the net all day. Lovely.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Linda sez.. "Crazy...I don't care if a certain % of the population is stupid enough to believe the Hoax. I just fret young kids being bombarded by this Hoax crap and tending to believe it. A 8 or 10 year old tends to believe anything an adult tells him. If JUST ONE youngster believes this Hoax Porn and becomes turned off from space, science and tech pursuits...blah blah blah blah."
Really now. What are the odds that some random Internet Losers and Paranoid Nutjobs have been able to uncover the GREATEST SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD? Let's see...after 40 YEARS of international scientific scrutiny and analysis by Astronomers, Physicists, Geologists and Engineers, a bunch of Douchebag Hoax Believers on YT are able to uncover ALL the hidden secrets. PUHH-LLEEEZZ. Back to your friggin video games and porn sites...TARDS!
I would add that it would be infinitely harder to fake. Even with modern CGI and special effects it still could not be faked sufficiently.
The fine dust on it's own proves it's in a vacuum and has much less gravity acting on it. No where on earth can this be achieved, in a parabolic dive for a minute or so at 1/6 but this of course this video is not set in some minature studio set in a vacuum tube stuffed onto an aircraft, it's the moon.
The apollo missions were fake. They launched themselves into space, orbited the earth for 8 days, ad while that happened, they recorded the videos in Area 51. There are loads of things to prove it too:
-Waving flag
-No black marks from landing LEM
-LEM retreats from the moon in an impossible way
-Craters on moon videos look like craters in Area 51
-Radiation entering the moon would have killed/severly hurt them if they wern't protected by 6ft of steel.
Without question there were moonhoaxes for tax money. What are Americans going to do about the New Mars manned mission hoax? Pay trillions of tax money for something that CANNOT be done?
i think you´re naturally high on the moon, dont need pot ^^
Chisuz 7 months ago
Where's the moonwalk?
260191894 10 months ago
um, they couldve died, i dont find those funny
severrnijKGU 10 months ago
@severrnijKGU and not only died, but these kinds of antics could've jeopardized further "moon missions". in earth's gravity with the almost "immediate" protection of an emt or a doc, the astronauts are told not to hop, skip or jump. but they could in moon's gravity and be so sure that they couldn't in any way hurt themselves with no obvious assistance of any medic. these could be the world's craziest videos!
zambi007i 10 months ago
bueno aca parece que gustamente estan atados arriba a hilos..pues esa manera de caer o de levantarse aunque hubiese poca gravedad..es muy rara
moralesfotovideo 11 months ago
Judging by how hard it is to move in bulky space suits in 1/6th gravity, I think the Moon Wars of 2140 will be very difficult indeed.
lazer1million 11 months ago
Fake as hell. Prove otherwise fucktards..
realdrummer110 1 year ago
@realdrummer110 real as hell. prove otherwise fucktards..
whitehawk38 10 months ago
@whitehawk38 This is so real. You can see when they kick up dust, it just disappears into space and doesn't come back down...
CrazyShakaZulu 9 months ago
@NASAvsPETE Hey an amateur ham guy, we have lots of HAM enthususiasts at the Cloudy Nights astronomy forum... Stop by over at CN and lets continue any absurd conspiracy contentions you might have there! That way we can talk science instead of ridiculous Youtube interjection. That way any and all NONSENSE like seeen here can be properly squashed by sound minds. And hey, if you are right scientifically you will have the full support of the group, no doubt about it.
See you there.....
guitarplayer4real 1 year ago
My friends...this is how things work in1/6 G.
Darko2625 1 year ago
being stoned on the moon would the best thing ever.
guitarplayer407 1 year ago 19
@guitarplayer407 i bet they had an "exoeriment" like that :D
PikkoPikkoPikko 11 months ago
The United Nations organisation constantly receiving dozens of e mails daily demanding the launch of an investigation with the subject of the "moon landings" by the American military allegedly taken place in the middle of the last century.Even with the certain knowledge the UN is probably the closest thing to a micky mouse political organization, is good to see the free thinking people of the Earth take some action against the American crooks.
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas LOL, you are obviously part of the punk ass problem. I can see where moon landings would be hard to believe coming from where you do.
As I keep telling you immature conspiracy rats (and still no takers after atleast 3 years), join a science group and try your lame thinking process there, you will be quickly and thoroughly clowned by people with educations. Fuck the conspiracy nuts, hang them all!
guitarplayer4real 1 year ago
@guitarplayer4real -- No need for hanging them. That would be just a bit cruel.
Besides, they do add some humor to the subject.
Castration so they cannot breed ... now that might be an idea.
(It would make your suggestion of "f-ing" them a bit pointless, though.)
nesokretep 1 year ago
@nesokretep Yea I let my word hole get the best of me sometimes.. just where this sort of subject matter is concerned. I have teenagers of my own who 'get it' so its frustrating to come here and see 14 year olds like realdrummer with empty mad claims and absolutely nothing to back them but foul language.
This subject would actually be fun to debate if it held any weight at all, no bad language needed.
guitarplayer4real 1 year ago
when I was on elementary school...I laughed a lot when I saw this video...now I'm on university and I still laughing at this vid...thanks the gods that we went to the moon...
Hamphield 1 year ago
@Hamphield and we did it in the late 60's that just blows me away
huntersdman 1 year ago
@Hamphield and we did it in the late 60's that just blows me away how we landed 40 years ago with that level of technology.
huntersdman 1 year ago
@huntersdman yup...and with a capsule with almost one byte...less than the memory of a watch...0.0...
Hamphield 1 year ago
Drunk on the moon shit yeah
beefnbeans 1 year ago
even with the spacesuit weight he still feels like he weighs half as usual so hopping upright is still possible. at four seconds he gets one foot caught under the other. in clearing his jam he ejects sand farther than i think possible for earth, the only video that i have ever seen that might really be on the Moon.
datzfast 1 year ago
lol, I love how that, despite all the rigorous training and education required to even be considered for a moon mission, many astronauts can't help but act/look like toddlers on a playground once they get there. AWESOME!
ty for footage.
420Kasper420 1 year ago
@420Kasper420 Considering the uneven, dusty ground, the weak gravity and the clumsy, stiff spacesuits, it was fantastic that they didn't fall more often
YDDES 1 year ago
HOORAY FOR HOLLYWOOD!!!
ZOMBIELANDakaUSA 1 year ago
This isn't funny, I like to see you wear a suit that on Earth weighs 300 pounds, even with the moon's low gravity it's still pretty heavy, plus they where in space for many days so the aren't use to having any gravity at all.
josh71111 1 year ago
@99thmonkee
Looks more like the clips have sped up/slowed down at different points.
Conclusion: You're just like every other moontard, you see what you want to see.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
Put a Benny Hill soundtrack over it :)
psychonaut25 1 year ago
Slow motion falling aint that funny. Now normal, or even FAST motion would be really funny. {= O
imnazhole 1 year ago
XD this needs funny sfx.
yuumeko 1 year ago
This is a fake, you space ass nerds.
wtfbristunna 1 year ago
such a fool America. . . LOL. . . xD. . .
c00LAdvisory 1 year ago
actually, those falling overs were pretty dangerous to the guys. the suit was not that reliable against the sharp moon stones.
computername 1 year ago
AHAHAHA x'D
Adlerfuckingqiqi 1 year ago
HOAX OF THE CENTURY
FAKE APOLLO MISSIONS
1969-1972
Nasa never went anywhere except 400 miles into the sky
Nasa Nazis Fake everything
US NWO Criminal Govt
Nasa Nazi Propaganda
NASA FAIRYTALES
nasafakedit 1 year ago
Nasa Faked it 6 Times
Nasa Nazi Propaganda
Apollo Fairy Tales
nasafakedit 1 year ago
@nasafakedit Despite it being an insult to all idiots everywhere, you're an idiot.
captwasabi 1 year ago
bong bong bong
edgaras1973 1 year ago
Why is the wire at the very beginning showing between asstros shoulders. Look carefully.
EGMAG 1 year ago
@EGMAG It's not a wire moron, it's part of the life support system backpack.
captwasabi 1 year ago
@captwasabi
hahahahahahhaham your fullof SHIT
EGMAG 1 year ago
@EGMAG And you need to be full of antipsychotics. Maybe toss in some electro shock therapy for good measure too.
captwasabi 1 year ago
@captwasabi
i AGREE. REGARDLESS THEY ARE WIRES AND THEY DID NOT GO TO THE MOOn; you fucking screwball.
EGMAG 1 year ago
@EGMAG You are wrong for a multitude of reasons. First, fly-systems in movies do not use metallic wires. They use ropes. The reason for this is safety. A wire under tension is a deadly thing should it ever snap. A rope? Not so much. Secondly, ropes are non-reflective which is a good thing to have on a movie set. What you see here is sunlight reflecting off the backpack airlock frame. Moron.
captwasabi 1 year ago
@EGMAG One other thing to consider is that what you are seeing is not even metal but simply white fabric. On a clear day sunlight on snow can be particulalry blinding. How much moreso would sunlight, undiluted through an atmosphere, be on the white fabric of the life support systems? As I said, you're a fucking moron. Instead of looking at what is probable you believe bullshit conspiracy theories.
captwasabi 1 year ago
@EGMAG That's not a wire gleaming. It's his radio antenna. Check on the Net (Wikipedia for example), for the layout of the moonsuits. There You will see it's just an antenna! It's better to search for facts before You are shouting "FAKE!". Otherwise you'll risk to look ignorant...
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES
forget the antenna. the antenna is very obvius. the howdee doody wire is there and is almost hidden. There are multitudes of howdee doodie wire bouncing astro examples all over the internet so wake up and stop fucking around like childish imbeciles who see the truth and call it a lie. idiots.
EGMAG 1 year ago
@EGMAG OK. Tell me where I can see this "multitudes of examples" where one can actually SEE the wires, and also how they are fastened to the spacesuits...
The wires can't be black; then they would clearly show up against the surface. And if they were grey, they would show up aginst the sky. Because they would be VERY bright lit...
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES where I can see this "multitudes of examples" <<
All over the cotton pickin internet!
EGMAG 1 year ago
@EGMAG Then please gine me just two or three adresses to sites that clearly show these wires!
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES
Did you wet the bed when you were five?
EGMAG 1 year ago
@EGMAG What a really super-intelligent argument You found there... Congratulations for a new high level of intellect!
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES
Well what did you expect. Just search the internet like evrybody else and find it on your own.
EGMAG 1 year ago
Another thing conspiracy freaks fail to take into account. If this had been filmed in a studio, how did they manage to light up sqaure miles of landscape with one light source. Just to light a lousy little one acre baseball field takes dozens of high output stadium lights positioned all around the field. Funny, I don't see one single studio light, anywhere. Sorry, but this was filmed 230,000 plus miles away on on the moon in SUNLIGHT!!!
nosajj12345 1 year ago
@nosajj12345
Sanky Kuprick magic. Like 2001
EGMAG 1 year ago
How did they keep the temperature in that tin can they flew to the moon nice and cool? What powered the air conditioner?
MaryOMackie 2 years ago 2
@MaryOMackie All system power on the Apollo LM was supplied via batteries. Original designs called for use of a fuel cell but those were later scrapped during development. Since they were in the dead of space they didn't need air conditioning. What they needed was heat which was supplied by the batteries.
captwasabi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APOLLO FAKE MISSIONS
Nasa edited out all the stars ***
In Nasa's Universe there are no stars
NASA = US New World Order Govt
those nazis lie about everything
NASA's new fake LRO images have been processed by ADOBE PHOTOSHOP
humanmonkeyworld 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
keep those strings in place!
MaryOMackie 2 years ago
lmao
humanmonkeyworld 2 years ago
I can not believe he would have taken the chance of rupturing the suit!
beautifulmicia 2 years ago
they were pretty rugged, built to take 120000 mph micro meteorite impacts,one reason the apollo 17 astronauts fell down so much was because the suits weighed alot more then previous missions. they were on the moon for 71 hours compared to the 2 1/2 hours for apollo 11.
ftutbs 2 years ago
I don't think it was on purpose
DrBuzz0 2 years ago
haha
fanny
winteringham 2 years ago
that last one was hilarious
trouble1993 2 years ago
Yep he just bounced up ^^ I want to be on the moon too xD
NesoDomino 2 years ago 2
@NesoDomino that isnt the moon. that is the earth with a string on hes backpack..
lagreify 1 year ago
lol i like the last one
CRHAYNES123 2 years ago
tits
kaylakamaz 2 years ago
drunken astronauts.. very good recolected of videos
bufonoise 2 years ago
Years of astronaut training put to good use...
ffpilot23 2 years ago
fake
gullungen84 2 years ago
This is proof that this is real if you look closely at the sand when the fall it keeps moving in the same direction which is a newton law of physics in a vacuum it will keep moving put on the moon it moves farther than someone who kick sand
SuperBigChug 2 years ago
its not real moon landing is fake
relikts4 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ooohhh you SO smart, you know everything, because we definetly have definitive proof that its a hoax, stfu and get some real information.
paintballfl 2 years ago
Now I have proof that you're an idiot.
rakgitarmen 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it has never been proven, just shut up.
paintballfl 2 years ago
Back to school now children, there is much to learn.. OBVIOUSLY!
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago 12
you first :D
relikts4 2 years ago
space.
silveragent111 2 years ago
Great gravity!
mrgalleria 2 years ago
Nope. you don't see any "dust carried by the wind" at 0.04. In fact, the dust particules kicked up by the astronaut, moving in a near-perfect parabola shows the effect of the vaccum pretty well. Remember, it'll go 6 times as far on the moon as a similar kick will do on Earth just because of the lower gravity. And farther because of the LACK of air.
We obviously had the equipment & launch vehicles to go to the moon. Everybody saw the lift-offs.
They went.
nesokretep 2 years ago 2
So you are telling me that the moon dust travelling like that when kicked would not travel the same if I was to kick a lump of wet sand on earth? It would look exactly the same, thats because this video was shot on earth. If this was on the moon the sand 'moon dust' would 6 times lighter than 'earth dust' so it should remain in the air longer and float to moon like a feather.
Just admit it, its bullshit, and you know it deep down.
stgeorgenationalist 2 years ago
OK. I'll tell you tthat I just did several physical tests.
Most of those shots are not long enough to see the dust go up and then all the way back down again, so it appears that it might be moving faster than it is.
But in the ones that are long enough to see the dust fall all the way back down, it stayed up much longer than the pebbles that I just dropped from the same height.
nesokretep 2 years ago
The dust is kicked the same as on earth! It just looks slower because the footage has been slowed down 50%
Lol, I cant believe you can believe ti. Dont let them fool you.
stgeorgenationalist 2 years ago
OK. I'll bite. Why do you have faith i n the hoax producers?
Things that are NOT in dispute:
We had and used the dozen huge Saturn V boosters.
We spent $30 billion (half-million engineers & assmelbers at $15 per hour)
We had space suits and cameras capable of use in the hot/cold of space.
Both the U.S. and Russia soft-landed on the moon (with instrument packages.)
The "it couldn't have happend" thing is: People were in a couple of those vehicles. Why is that impossible?
nesokretep 2 years ago
Oh. And why do YOU feel the need to change your story. You first say that the video as-is "would look exactly the same" as your wet sand on earth.
But now you feel the need to reverse your perception and story and say that it would not.
What measurements or verification or cross-checking have YOU done?
nesokretep 2 years ago
You know, it probably would take more effort to fake it and keep the secret than to actually build the real thing and fly to the Moon. So I doubt it's bullshit.
Of course, you probably think Nick Gri££in is a real nationalist. He isn't. He's faker than the Moon landing conspiracies are.
theredraven 2 years ago 2
How the fuck is Nick Griffin money motivated yout tit?!
The moon landing is bullshit, the BNP are the answer, and you are the cancer.
stgeorgenationalist 2 years ago
Just google Griffinwatch to see what REAL nationalists think of him.
Poor Andrew Brons, having to work with that fat idiot. His fucking deputy is an MI5 agent. Did you not know this? Why do you think he's nicknamed "5Imon Darby"?
Fuck, least the NF were legit.
theredraven 2 years ago
tit
LordInksworth 2 years ago
Lol
Twat
stgeorgenationalist 2 years ago
rofl
arse
LordInksworth 2 years ago
Lmao
Cunt
stgeorgenationalist 2 years ago
Great example of these guys, mostly pilots, trying to adapt to both restrictive suits and a different gravity. effin cowboys muckin' about! Wouldn't you be the same? Just pushing the limits... funny stuff.
krisdevalle 2 years ago
Can all you people here tell me why would they fake 6 lunar landings?? 12 men have walked on the moon, 9 of which are still alive. If you were gonna fake it surely you'd just do it the once. And about 400,000 people worked to put man on the moon, from building the space suit to the landing crafts, if this was fake, surely some one would of come forward. Face it people your lives are dull, and now your just diminishing the great and amazing work of others.
1975buddha 2 years ago 8
@1975buddha right on! dont forget the cost of 25 billion dollars and the lives of three men, Virgil "Gus" Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee
muddbabesari 1 year ago
It doesn't need wind you dick head, it has forward motion from the astronaut. If you through something in a vacuum it doesn't hit a wall, it carries forward with the velocity you've given it. Twat.
1975buddha 2 years ago
HOAX? Wouldn't surprise me one bit
toastedhippy 2 years ago
Lol this morons still cant control the rope conected to them!
nonametoshow 2 years ago
no, the mix of low gravity and no air resistance causes it to fly away pretty far, just give up on it, even sovjet agrees on the fact that they where to the moon, AND THEY SURE HAD SPIES!!!
madichelp0 2 years ago
u see the wire holding them up
offlineDragonpwner 2 years ago
yes, in fact
bahrest 2 years ago
0.03 you can see him not fall flat on his face because the pulling of the wire is holding him up.
FAKE!
stgeorgenationalist 2 years ago 2
No. You don't see any wire at 0.03.
Everybody who has ever seen a close-up of one of those EVA packs knows what that was.
nesokretep 2 years ago
00:09 The astronaut floated. If a feather and a hammer drop immediately at the same time during an experiment, how does the astronaut float? There is gravity on the moon. The dust kicked up by the lunar rover didn't float, so how is it the astronaut does? Wire?
snocamo154 2 years ago
There is no astronaut "floating" at 0.09
Everything needs time to accelerate. If he jumped up a little, then his accelereration is towards the ground is negative, then becomes zero, and then goes positive.
nesokretep 2 years ago
I'd like to see one of the conspiracy idiots try to explain how these clips, including the dust falling at 1/6 g, could be filmed on earth.
erikmartin2 2 years ago
It's a shame all the original tapes are missing, I guess someone recorded over the original with future missions. They looked for three years, and came up empty
talltom1973 2 years ago
there isnt a wire,its an antenna.its not a wire,see it carefully
mj61095 2 years ago
Look carefully at 0:12 - 0:15, you can actually see the cable on the top of his backpack as he is being pulled back up onto his feet. The cable comes from somewhere above the "set" look for yourself and see the NASA footage itself proves the staging of this event. Watch how he rises and see he is being pulled, other footage shows the same effect.
mrmrlee 2 years ago
There is no cable.
All I see is an antenna.
Decrapifier 2 years ago
there is no cabled idiot
yoyoyoimcoolio 2 years ago
its called an antena u idiot ..and it stays at the same angle to his suit ....so its not a cable ..
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
lol they would trip, its not the same gravity as on earth, but nice jumping back up on the last trip.
kirbykool1 2 years ago
nice recovery at 0:09 !!
johnayerger13 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fake? Come on. Astronauts, NASA management, technicians, film crews, people who created the moon stages, directed the films, dealt with the outtakes, the scientific advisors who would have needed to be on hand to oversee every aspect of every bit of film, video or voice transmission to make it as authentic as possible. Surely some of these people (if not most of them) would have had a guilty conscience and picked up the phone and rung the Washington Post or NBC... surely.
dopje31857 2 years ago 4
Why doesn't the "not spam" button work...
Weirdo10o4 2 years ago
Gravity on the moon is 1/16 of the Earth.
No wonder they fell down!
AcePilot101 3 years ago
only 1/6
csoss 3 years ago 7
Has enyone considered the gravity of more is so low , sometimes it will seem like partial floating at the moon
rubaye2000 3 years ago
Apparently the moon dust and silica was very abrasive; and many of the suits had small leaks by the end of the missions. The astronauts had to increase pressure in them to compensate.
krisdevalle 3 years ago
hahaha that is hilarious. Gotta love that ninja rebound in the last clip!!
uviuar 3 years ago 2
man can you blevie it people 1,000 years ago looking into the moon and it was impossblie for them to get there and look at us almost 40 years ago we went amzaning what man can do
One1Ali 3 years ago 6
@One1Ali u shouldn't be saying this is true (moon landing), before u call me a fagget, or a communist, and before u say the moon landnign is true study the ven allen, and why are there no objets on the moon right now that the apollo missions supustly left there
Chicken1397 1 year ago
@Chicken1397 YOU should study the van Allen belts. They are NOT lethal, or very hazardouz to just pass through and don't stay in them, just like an X-ray is not lethal if You don't stay in the X-ray machine for a long time. And, there IS equipment left there. Haven't You heard of the laser reflectors still in use to measure the Moons increasing distance? Also, the lunar satellites have photographed the landing sites with LEM's, Rovers and tracks on the ground.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES --Also, the lunar satellites have photographed the landing sites with LEM's, Rovers and tracks on the ground --
Have you really seen such a pictures? Can you post web sites where we can see LEM wreckages, flags, rovers and other stuff left on the moon, taken from satellites today? That would be great!! If they really exists........
Thanks in advance.
1965christian 1 year ago
@1965christian Search for "NASA - LRO Sees Apollo Landing Sites", for example. I haven't said one see any flags, but the LEM's and tracks from the Rovers and even astronaut footpaths are easily seen on several photographs. But, of course, those who don't want to believe that man has been on the Moon, will just say the pictures are fake.
YDDES 1 year ago
@One1Ali
And you believe that.. ahaha u guys are funny though!!!
Be A MAN and SEARH whats going on in REAL LIFE!!!
Aynenflow 1 year ago
Of course; It's a matter of scientific ingenuity, hard work, courage and dedication
only for the earth orbits, never a moonwalk. You see moonwalk claims are a multi-trillion yearly business in all sorts of media. How could the money chasers refuse such huge amounts of income unless they vigorously uphold a moon walk story? COMMERCIALIZATION of the Yankee taxpayers dollars!
EGMAG 3 years ago
Someone suggested to me that this was a practise film in the NASA hangar. And that on the moon, when the crew spotted and in turn challenged by the aliens, the practise clips were substituted in while actual events took a turn. Is that at all possible?
CommanderUTube 3 years ago
Not so funny when you consider a tear or puncture would have ended it for them.
hingedelephant 3 years ago
haha that's amazing.
despite the fact that i'm russian, i'm proud of that whole expedition, and generally those guys are more than heroes, cause they were potential deadmen. i think despite that it's america, technologies were insecure at that time..
Vitaminnn07 3 years ago
The last one the astronaut played it off like a G
PCC9 3 years ago 2
This you know can be taken as another disinformation exercise to discourage a more closer look at the moon landings and why certain tapes of NASA remain lost and not available to the public domain.
The people who ask questions are getting too close to the truth for those responsible to encourage juvenile tactics of responses.
While the moon landing looked legit to me, too many anomalies abound to prompt the birth of conspiracies theories. :)
CommanderUTube 3 years ago
CommanderUTube,
Please cite references.
Which "certain tapes?"
Which "people who ask questions?"
What "truth?"
What "responsibility?"
What "anomalies?"
Perhaps the continuity would have been better if they'd had a chance to do a second take.
Cp1Punishment 3 years ago
You can look at any footage of anything and find the same sort of "anomalies". I'm thinking of applying the moon hoax believer method to the footage of my son's last soccer match to prove it was all faked. Look at the wires holding that ball up! Why doesn't the ball knock his head off? Who is that grownup with the whistle, the film director? They appear to change direction halfway through-that doesn't make sense! The goalie kicks it straight to the opposition-was he paid off? Oh,the dumbness.
snoberts 3 years ago
Most of the 'anomolies' come from ignorance of an alien enviroment. Liek the classic 'Why no stars?' question. The answer is simple, it was daytime, and if you want a good picture of the lunar surface, which was what they were studying, the exposure time would be too short to capture stars. People assume because the sky is black, it's night. Actually, its black because there is no air. Ignorance, not anomolies create conspiricy theories.
loperspest 3 years ago 3
What makes the Moon Hoax Believers tick? First and foremost...they want to sound smart. They want to feel important. They want to be respected. All day they carefully monitor their YT Hoax clips, and when they see one of their supporters chiming in, their heart skips a beat with joy. They absolutely beam with pride thinking they are taking on the Evil NASA Establishment and winning!!!! LOL!!! TOO funny. What a bunch of losers.
LindaStevensBZ 3 years ago 9
even if the whole moon thing was a hoax, is it really worth arguing about. in my eyes we wasted money that could have fed starving familes. and also, rocketfull+atmosphere= not good news.
saygoodbyetoanniemay 3 years ago
depends how you look at things. I think space exploration and investing in the future is worth the cost. The Iraq war has used up about $2 trillion that could help families here. It all depends on how you look at it.
IceYeti116 3 years ago
i dont agree with the iraq war either
saygoodbyetoanniemay 3 years ago
the moon landings were not a waste of money, the technology we have today, this very pc im typing on is all thanks to those moon landings, pushing the current technology to the limit. not a waste of money or time at all and some day mankind shall return, and this time to stay!!
punji73 3 years ago
IT WASN'T A HOAX YOU IDIOTS!!!!!
HSguy12 3 years ago 10
You can't hide the fact that the average Moon Hoax Believer couldn't even locate a Physics textbook in a library...much less understand anything written in it.
FACT: Not a SINGLE SMART PERSON IN THE WORLD BELIEVES THE MOON HOAX. NONE, ZERO, NADA.
Only the marginally educated morons of the world believe the Hoax. Hoaxers...something is wrong with your picture. Can you guess what it is?
Every PhD SCIENTIST, ENGINEER and PROFESSOR in the world knows Apollo was an incredible feat. FACT!
LindaStevensBZ 3 years ago 5
linda you and me would get on so good. great comment mate cheers!!
sparklieboy 3 years ago
ITS A HOAX!! FOOLS!! THE WORLD IS FLAT!!! DON'T LET THE GOVERNMENT FOOL YOU!!! THERE WERE NEVER DINOSUARS EITHER!! THE GODS ON MOUNT OLYMPUS ARE JUSTY MESSING WITH YOUR MINDS!! and elvis is living on mars with marylin munroe bigfoot is their pet, and JFK is the mayor of the colony on mars. I forget anything? I am not wearing my tinfoil hat so the alien mind controll probes sometimes make me forget things.
coldshot357 3 years ago 5
Seriously? Elvis got Monroe? Sweet!
grayhog86 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
At 0:11...so fake.
thatguypete 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And before anyone sends a reply that involves travel to "space" with space shuttle, ISS, etc. -- That is not SPACE -- Manned vehicles can only travel in Earth's atmosphere. The shuttle and the ISS are 250 miles above Earth's surface. Take a look at a globe and you'll find out how incredibly close to the planet that is. Shuttle and ISS are in the thermosphere. NOT SPACE --There is no such thing as a "Space Walk". It is in "reality" a "high atmosphere walk". -- "True science" class dismissed.
ispyanewworldorder 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. -- The science no one wants to let out is that space is the opposite of our ocean. Take a trip down in our ocean and you get compression. Eventually, anything with an air pocket will crush; instantly. Space is the exact opposite.'Decompression'. Anything with an air pocket will decompress; instantly.(ergo) Humans will never be able to travel off this planet to the moon or anywhere else. Only machines can be sent to space or deep ocean.
ispyanewworldorder 3 years ago
the dust does that because there is no air on the moon. otherwise the dust would form into a cloud. only in the vaccum of space will it do that.
anonyomous78 3 years ago
take a look at the dust from the moon!!! somone please explain how it reacts the way it does??? sand doesnt act like that on the earth
woodman19 3 years ago
You cannot be serious can you?
THEY ARE IN A VACUUM! ALSO NOTE THE VERTICAL ACCLERATION IS SLOWER WHY? THE GRAVITY IS LESS 1.62m/s2, it's 9.81m/s2 on earth. GO READ A BOOK ON BASIC PHYSICS, VERY BASIC PHYSICS.
BeSkeptical 3 years ago
you do realize a feather will drop like a stone if there is no air, the moon has no air, therefore its impossible for the dust to float as it does. air has nothing to do with it
woodman19 3 years ago
Of course I know that, I have a physics major. The dust is not floating, the kicked up dust has a perfect parabolic movement. They are in a vacuum, they are in much less gravity than earth, they are on the moon full stop.
BeSkeptical 3 years ago 3
lol then why are we argueing if we both agree? oh sorry, you were trying to make yourself look like a genious from my first post as you thought i believed in a hoax.
woodman19 3 years ago
Oh sorry no, I was just re-affirming again just for the conspiracy theorist idiots to get a grasp on reality. Sorry for the confusion.
BeSkeptical 3 years ago
I did read my first post and understand i might of sounded like a fag hoaxest who knows nothing of Physics my appologies as well
woodman19 3 years ago
unless there supported by bungies i think this is real
target741 3 years ago
LindaStevensBZ...why is it such a big issue with you if some think the landings were fake? Me thinks thou dost protest too much.
crazy650c 3 years ago
Crazy...I don't care if a certain % of the population is stupid enough to believe the Hoax. I just fret young kids being bombarded by this Hoax crap and tending to believe it. A 8 or 10 year old tends to believe anything an adult tells him. If JUST ONE youngster believes this Hoax Porn and becomes turned off from space, science and tech pursuits...that will be a tragedy IMO. Before the net, the Tards just stayed at home and watched MTV. Now they defecate on the the net all day. Lovely.
LindaStevensBZ 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Linda sez.. "Crazy...I don't care if a certain % of the population is stupid enough to believe the Hoax. I just fret young kids being bombarded by this Hoax crap and tending to believe it. A 8 or 10 year old tends to believe anything an adult tells him. If JUST ONE youngster believes this Hoax Porn and becomes turned off from space, science and tech pursuits...blah blah blah blah."
Get a life you stupid bitch.
straydog02 3 years ago
I've said it before...but it deserves repeating. If you're a teenager or just a casual Hoax Believer...no big deal...you'll wise up.
But...if you're over 25 and REALLY believe the Hoax...you have at least one of the following problems.
1. You're very stupid.
2. You're very gullible.
3. You just LOVE CT's.
4. You love the Alex Jones type NutJobs.
5. You're Paranoid. Yes...clinically.
6. You did shitty in school and believing the Hoax is revenge against your science teacher. TARDS!
LindaStevensBZ 4 years ago 6
im a teenager and im against the hoax its stupid im scottish but any way america FTW
target741 3 years ago
PEOPLE:
Really now. What are the odds that some random Internet Losers and Paranoid Nutjobs have been able to uncover the GREATEST SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD? Let's see...after 40 YEARS of international scientific scrutiny and analysis by Astronomers, Physicists, Geologists and Engineers, a bunch of Douchebag Hoax Believers on YT are able to uncover ALL the hidden secrets. PUHH-LLEEEZZ. Back to your friggin video games and porn sites...TARDS!
LindaStevensBZ 4 years ago 3
I would add that it would be infinitely harder to fake. Even with modern CGI and special effects it still could not be faked sufficiently.
The fine dust on it's own proves it's in a vacuum and has much less gravity acting on it. No where on earth can this be achieved, in a parabolic dive for a minute or so at 1/6 but this of course this video is not set in some minature studio set in a vacuum tube stuffed onto an aircraft, it's the moon.
BeSkeptical 3 years ago 3
The apollo missions were fake. They launched themselves into space, orbited the earth for 8 days, ad while that happened, they recorded the videos in Area 51. There are loads of things to prove it too:
-Waving flag
-No black marks from landing LEM
-LEM retreats from the moon in an impossible way
-Craters on moon videos look like craters in Area 51
-Radiation entering the moon would have killed/severly hurt them if they wern't protected by 6ft of steel.
Trust me, it never happened!!!
mollyjayne2k7 4 years ago
Go take some physic classes. You'll then understand and say "OOOOOHHHHHH!"
toodoo213 3 years ago
You are one stupid fool...of course we went to the moon...you are an airhead of the largest proportion.
clyde8her 3 years ago 2
You know those might be acidients who knows but some astronaughts actully did that to cover there suits in moon dust to be studied
soad1722 4 years ago
Ouch! They were so close to smashing the thin layer of glass that protects them from whats out there
TinfishUK 4 years ago
Without question there were moonhoaxes for tax money. What are Americans going to do about the New Mars manned mission hoax? Pay trillions of tax money for something that CANNOT be done?
EGMAG 4 years ago
Stop being a cock. If you knew anything about science, engineering and rocketry you would know what can and cannot be done.
AgainstTheeWickedly 3 years ago