I for one never pay too much attention to WSJ editorial board, especailly now that it is a part of the same empire with Faux Noise.
So their main beef is over CO2. Of course, is CO2 is declared as a pollutant - which even this ectremely conservative supreme court recongized a few years ago - this will negatively impact those who profit the most from the harm created, namely the coal and gas industry. I reminded the cigarette industry too had teams of scientist on their payroll.
This has been flagged as spam show
This vidéo make me thinking. Look on my vidéo : it is surnatural.
BikerVincennes 4 weeks ago
I for one never pay too much attention to WSJ editorial board, especailly now that it is a part of the same empire with Faux Noise.
So their main beef is over CO2. Of course, is CO2 is declared as a pollutant - which even this ectremely conservative supreme court recongized a few years ago - this will negatively impact those who profit the most from the harm created, namely the coal and gas industry. I reminded the cigarette industry too had teams of scientist on their payroll.
lawilson200 1 month ago 3