Hugh Everett's Parallel Universes and space time reality.

[danno321s]

Hugh was a genius. Math and Beauty tend to turn out correct for some reason.

[nickharvey7]

@danno321s Yes! This is all very true, but theses parallel universes are just different future potential possibilities in our one three dimensional Universe in this theory!

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.

[hkurtblache]

no doubt...this is subjectively real...as all home-spun theories are...bringing anything into an objective world requires more than anybodies sense of reality... ... ...does it not???

Certainly a why is important to step by step reasoning &is no less important than what& how!!!...but isn't the acid test for reality thereness &whatness???

[nickharvey7]

@hkurtblache I am not sure, but even this uncertainty is explained in this theory as part of a process that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual. This process of continuous creation or change we see and feel as the flow of time itself.

[Mornys]

We have free will? Guess again.

[danno321s]

@Mornys We have enough choices to give the illusion of free will.

[macic666dp]

Awesome. Keep up the good work!

[nickharvey7]

@901blitz Thanks for the comment! I am on You Tube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time (Quantum Atom Theory) I am an artist and this is why it doesn’t look very not very scientific.

[nickharvey7]

@901blitz Thanks for the comment! I am on You Tube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time (Quantum Atom Theory) I am an artist and this is why it doesn’t look very not very scientific.

[nickharvey7]

@901blitz Thanks for the comment! I am on You Tube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time (Quantum Atom Theory) I am an artist and this is why it doesn’t look very not very scientific.

[isleofyew1]

So what has been the reaction of the scientific community so far? I see that ideas involving consciousness are popular because they leave room for wild dreams. Quantum Atom Theory seems more rational, are there experiments planned to test this hypothesis so the theory can be accepted or left out? Where and how please.

[nickharvey7]

@isleofyew1 There has been no reaction of the scientific community so far, but thanks for saying that this hypothesis is more rational than the ideas involving consciousness. We need to understand consciousness before we start using it to explain quantum physics. I believe it is the other way round and physics will help us explain consciousness as a physical process. There are no experiments planned, but this theory can explain the Two Slit Experiment.

[mescience]

I'll give you my opinion. Since you posted this, I assume thats what you are looking for. First, I like your artistic presentation. You must have spent a lot of time on this. Its nice to see someone taking a different stand on the Multi-univ concepts. But your presentation leaves me feelng like I just drank water from a firehose and I dont understand how what you presented is anything new or different from current scientific thinking?

[nickharvey7]

@mescience It is different from current scientific thinking because we only need three dimensions and one variable of time in this theory.

[nickharvey7]

Thanks for your comment! But I feel the artwork helps because people can see everyday objects that are based on atoms and therefore quantum mechanics. I would find it very difficult to make a video based just on mathematics and I feel the viewer would also find it difficult to understand.

[357jonas]

Far too few Many worlds interpretation clips on youtube. I appreciate the effort you put into this, but this video could be improved by removing all the artwork. They just add layers of confusion. Great thoughts ARE very hard to convey. So keep it simple!