For quality, best results would be to go: analogue master tapes direct to DSD. Seems a great pity that this was not adopted here. I don't really want anything removed ... I'd be happy with a perfect copy of the studio master tapes ... and direct to DSD is the closest we will get to that.
I'm sorry, but you do NOT use the LP cutting tape, but the stereo mixdown tape (ie a generation before LP cutting tape). In fact, ALL respectable remastering engineers use stereo mixdown tapes where possible (Steve Hoffman being an example) - no decent and experienced audio engineer would preference the LP tape over the stereo mixdown!!!!
@gotham61 Well I said "where possible" - of course Furtwängler is in mono. In this case you would use the mono mixdown tape that hasn't been processed for LP production.
@mozpiano2 Did you even watch the video? Listen again from 14.00, where he describes how the tape used for the reissue was NOT the edited and EQed tape used for disc cutting, but a second tape recorded simultaneously. Again, with these recordings there is no such thing as a separate "mixdown tape," even a mono one. Everything was mixed live during the performance and recorded onto a single track.
so that's how EMI ruins the sound of the mastertapes! the master sounds really good, listen at 6:54. Removing noise is removing ambience, hence dull and dead-sounding cds.
the problem is the COST of these SACDs/ only available from Japan, they are $43.00 per SINGLE CD in the US. Ridiculous price, not going to pay for the engineering costs. Maybe the Japanese buying public can afford that price but EMI needs to come up with a better pricing structure if it wants to recoup the costs and open a new high-end audio market for historical product.
Thank you so much for this video. Absolutely fascinating. I hope that this project is a commercial success because the music is so important, and it is essential that this type of work continue. I am especially interested, though, in the EMI equalization applied to these recordings. Is the Japanese audiophile market more satisfied with the EMI eq as opposed to the original eq which was mastered using "primitive" equipment? ~ Best wishes.
If the end product is for SACD (which uses the native DSD digital format), then clearly the optimal AD conversion is Analog -> DSD ... not Analog to 96 kHz 24bit.
@wozzwozz No so: it is not possible to manipulate, like EQ or do noise removal, a DSD file. Not even make edits. All digital manipulation must be done in PCM format. For that reason it would make no sense to transfer first to DSD, then convert to PCM for mastering.
This is impressive. I was amazed when you brought out the tape and had it right there, in your hands. Does your work ever impress you? That is, to hold something like a Furtwangler master and think, "Actually, this - in a very real way - IS Furtwangler." I've done a documentary film about him and this sort of thing fascinates me. Thank you very much more sharing this with us!
@ingodidoubt No - the DVDs have just gone into production. Also, a few hundred hundred copyright restrictions makes it doubtful that my film will be seen on the internet anytime soon - this will change. Stay tuned.
For quality, best results would be to go: analogue master tapes direct to DSD. Seems a great pity that this was not adopted here. I don't really want anything removed ... I'd be happy with a perfect copy of the studio master tapes ... and direct to DSD is the closest we will get to that.
siegfriedYa 1 month ago
I'm sorry, but you do NOT use the LP cutting tape, but the stereo mixdown tape (ie a generation before LP cutting tape). In fact, ALL respectable remastering engineers use stereo mixdown tapes where possible (Steve Hoffman being an example) - no decent and experienced audio engineer would preference the LP tape over the stereo mixdown!!!!
mozpiano2 3 months ago
@mozpiano2 Good luck finding a "stereo" mixdown tape of anything Furtwangler recorded. Furtwangler was never recorded in stereo.
While monoed bass is a good argument for not using a disc cutting tape for a stereo release, it doesn't apply with a mono release.
gotham61 2 months ago
@gotham61 Well I said "where possible" - of course Furtwängler is in mono. In this case you would use the mono mixdown tape that hasn't been processed for LP production.
mozpiano2 2 months ago
@mozpiano2 Did you even watch the video? Listen again from 14.00, where he describes how the tape used for the reissue was NOT the edited and EQed tape used for disc cutting, but a second tape recorded simultaneously. Again, with these recordings there is no such thing as a separate "mixdown tape," even a mono one. Everything was mixed live during the performance and recorded onto a single track.
gotham61 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry, are you ALSO responsible!
johnbshk 3 months ago
Are you leo responsible for the remastering of the 100+ SACDs being released by EMI Japan in the next few months?
Thanks
johnbshk 3 months ago
so that's how EMI ruins the sound of the mastertapes! the master sounds really good, listen at 6:54. Removing noise is removing ambience, hence dull and dead-sounding cds.
Johanneshouse 5 months ago
I can see the second waveform has higher amplitude in the Tannhäuser overture
klassische 8 months ago
Don't remove all the 'natural' tape distortion! It's wonderful. Musicians would love to have it in their digital recordings these days...
soulagent79 8 months ago
very interesting
soulagent79 8 months ago
the problem is the COST of these SACDs/ only available from Japan, they are $43.00 per SINGLE CD in the US. Ridiculous price, not going to pay for the engineering costs. Maybe the Japanese buying public can afford that price but EMI needs to come up with a better pricing structure if it wants to recoup the costs and open a new high-end audio market for historical product.
manrootfl 8 months ago
Long live the SACD format. If you haven't listened to SACD yet, you don't know what you are missing!
ingodidoubt 8 months ago
CONGRATULATIONS ON LAST EYE IN THE AUDIO CHAIN ;)
brndzal 10 months ago
Please, his Tristan und Isolde!!!!
MrJdaniel1371 1 year ago
Thank you so much for this video. Absolutely fascinating. I hope that this project is a commercial success because the music is so important, and it is essential that this type of work continue. I am especially interested, though, in the EMI equalization applied to these recordings. Is the Japanese audiophile market more satisfied with the EMI eq as opposed to the original eq which was mastered using "primitive" equipment? ~ Best wishes.
mtvernonmills 1 year ago
If the end product is for SACD (which uses the native DSD digital format), then clearly the optimal AD conversion is Analog -> DSD ... not Analog to 96 kHz 24bit.
wozzwozz 1 year ago 2
@wozzwozz No so: it is not possible to manipulate, like EQ or do noise removal, a DSD file. Not even make edits. All digital manipulation must be done in PCM format. For that reason it would make no sense to transfer first to DSD, then convert to PCM for mastering.
MrArkienkeli 7 months ago
Interesting to see cedar in action.
Thanks for video
lohanette 1 year ago
This is impressive. I was amazed when you brought out the tape and had it right there, in your hands. Does your work ever impress you? That is, to hold something like a Furtwangler master and think, "Actually, this - in a very real way - IS Furtwangler." I've done a documentary film about him and this sort of thing fascinates me. Thank you very much more sharing this with us!
TheStockwell 1 year ago 3
@TheStockwell Have you posted your documentary to youtube? I would be very interested in seeing that.
ingodidoubt 8 months ago
@ingodidoubt No - the DVDs have just gone into production. Also, a few hundred hundred copyright restrictions makes it doubtful that my film will be seen on the internet anytime soon - this will change. Stay tuned.
TheStockwell 8 months ago
is the audio compressed??
qhubbles 1 year ago
@qhubbles No.
abbeyroad 1 year ago
@abbeyroad Very interesting video; thanks for sharing!!
qhubbles 1 year ago