Now we know the wing nut jobs are the tea baggers. joe's taxes have stayed the same or have declined. Had this fuck face, which he won't show, had any sense, he would take down this bull shit. This dumb ass has watched to many Clairol commercials-if you tell 2 friends, then they will tell 2 friends...
Mccain puts out a bald boob and a true boob to support his campaign-but, blame someone else.
@walkermydawg ha ha ha ha - First -- he makes unsubstantiated claims about joe's taxes. There is no way to know for sure what joe's tax status is. What an idiot. The main point is - Olbermann was an abject FAILURE - just like YOU - and he is GONE! ha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha ha!
Olberman is full of shit.Mccain represents the working class as much as the democrats do.Niether party represents me.Fuck Olberman,hes a propagandist for the left.Fuck O'Reilly,hes a propagandist for the right.Joe the plummer is a plummer.Legally you can be a plummer without a master plummers license in the state of ohio.Quit reading far left talking points olberman,and do some real reporting.Olberman put more into JTP,than Obamas affiliation with wright.Hes a joke.
@jays2474 mccain misrepresents the middle class, you dumb fuck. From which of his 13 houses did you get this bull shit. I never advocate violence because posters like you hit every branch descending from the stupid tree. I would post that the dictionary in your house has been terribly abused, but that would be an errant assumption that you have a trailer, much less a house, and the dictionary, is in the reference section there in the library where you are using the computer.
@MrEatonbeaver My point is the democrats dont give a shit about me either.I am so sick of you left wing cocksuckers insulting those who disagree with your view.You leftist claim to care about me, the middle class working man but in reallity you care about far leftist issues nothing more.At least I know where I stand with republicans.I have to sit here and listen to democrats say they care about me.As for violence.The left is as violent as you get if you disagree with them asshole.
@jays2474 Your are as stupid as joe the "plummer", and as the rule is in the plumber business, of plumbers's, the shit floats to top.
All Olbermann did was state a fact: shit for brains joe does not have a license. He did not advocate that he was required to have one, albeit he would if he were to own a business as such. However, since joe's tax's under Obama have gone down (or at least remained the same), what's news on his buying of this business. Just like a sheep of the fixed channel.
You concentrate on income in the same way the tax system does. Taxable income is not the amount you keep. Make 250k in a year - have 223k of expenses that are not considered business write offs, and get TAXED on 250k. Whatever interest you make on savings gets taxed at a higher % rate than the interest rate. That is why saving alone without additional investment is not a retirement plan...
But Obama's tax plan will only tax the income you keep.
If you have 223K expensive, that wouldn't be considered under Obama's tax plan. I believe that would be the gross revenue.. not the profit (the part the owner actually keeps).
I don't think you know enough about Obama's tax plan to criticize it..
No - LIVING EXPENSES!!! Living expenses are not written off. You make 250 - get taxed on 250 - but during the same year, you spent 200 on living expenses that are not tax write offs...The government doesn't pay your mortgage. You might be able to claim the interest, but that's all. You want your son or daughter to take piano lessons or not? You can't have the government pay for that, and on and on...
first off... no one spends 200K on living expenses.. I was in the context of business expenses... If you do spend 200K on living, you matter well be buying a home every year while you're at it.
Second, I never said it would be written off.. However, if you reinvest in you business, that money won't be taxed... you would get a tax cut..
The context of taxation falls under "Obama's tax plan".. If you're not going to stay in that frame, any discussion would be pointless.
and lets not forget, as you said, it's only an extra 1,000 dollars, so thats the difference between taking home 160,000 and 159,000 after taxes, roughly. are you really so greedy that you'd complain about only having 159 thousand dollars a year? breaking it down further, that's over 60 dollars an hour, is that something to cry over?
No, you're not taking into account the total tax amount. And you are ignoring the fact that the extra grand is already spoken for in additional expenses that mean you don't actually keep the entire grand. Unless you choose to deny yourself the additional luxuries that money could have bought, or trade off expanding your business by spending some or all that extra grand. See? That's at the heart of the argument. It is the question as to whether you hold in regard most of your fellow citizens..
to be intelligent and compassionate enough to decide how to spend the money they earn, or if you distrust your fellow man in such matters that you feel safer allowing the GOVERMENT to make those spending decisions instead. The paradox - the GOVERNMENT is comprised of as many if not more fallible, self-interested, greedy, and some good - PEOPLE..
I am indeed taking it in. 33% tax on 250,000 83,000 leaving you 167,000 you said yourself, 30k over means an extra 1K in taxes. and tax would be 11k roughly, so fine, you have 156k a year. Hardly a boohoo. I work for a small business owner BTW and may take it over when he retires
156k - fine - How much of that does he now keep? How much MUST he reinvest? How much in living expenses does he have? How much does he really end up with? The point is - focus on the extra 1100. Why don't you trust Joe to spend that money correctly, but expect that Chriss Dodd or Barney Frank will?
No, first you don't know that for fact. You're taking KO's word for it Even if it were not happening, the question joe asked would still be valid as hypothetic...
it is valid, but Joe said Obama's tax plan would be more helpful to him after Obama explained it, and he likes the sounds of it better, though he still fully supports McCain, but the whole arguements falls apart when Joe says Obama's plan is better
Yes, Øbama's plan is better for all those who are satisfied to stay within their tax bracket and not try to strive to better themselves...I will grant you that..
I don't know what people you know...but successful people I know realize their success, although mostly a result of their hard work, is also partly due to the environment this great country provides them in which to operate, and because they are intelligent, recognize this fact, and give back to the country...
Now we know the wing nut jobs are the tea baggers. joe's taxes have stayed the same or have declined. Had this fuck face, which he won't show, had any sense, he would take down this bull shit. This dumb ass has watched to many Clairol commercials-if you tell 2 friends, then they will tell 2 friends...
Mccain puts out a bald boob and a true boob to support his campaign-but, blame someone else.
walkermydawg 10 months ago
@walkermydawg ha ha ha ha - First -- he makes unsubstantiated claims about joe's taxes. There is no way to know for sure what joe's tax status is. What an idiot. The main point is - Olbermann was an abject FAILURE - just like YOU - and he is GONE! ha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha haha ha ha ha!
marklross2 10 months ago
olbermann represents what is wrong with this country, liar and wants this country to doom
michellekwan483 1 year ago
@michellekwan483 Absolutely...
marklross2 1 year ago
Olberman is full of shit.Mccain represents the working class as much as the democrats do.Niether party represents me.Fuck Olberman,hes a propagandist for the left.Fuck O'Reilly,hes a propagandist for the right.Joe the plummer is a plummer.Legally you can be a plummer without a master plummers license in the state of ohio.Quit reading far left talking points olberman,and do some real reporting.Olberman put more into JTP,than Obamas affiliation with wright.Hes a joke.
jays2474 2 years ago
Right on....
marklross2 2 years ago 2
@jays2474
well I think it's Joe the PlumBer, not
Joe the plummer ... who stuck in his thumb and pulled out a plum and said what a good boy am I ... not that kinda plummer, dude ...
BellyButtonQuiz 2 years ago
@jays2474 mccain misrepresents the middle class, you dumb fuck. From which of his 13 houses did you get this bull shit. I never advocate violence because posters like you hit every branch descending from the stupid tree. I would post that the dictionary in your house has been terribly abused, but that would be an errant assumption that you have a trailer, much less a house, and the dictionary, is in the reference section there in the library where you are using the computer.
MrEatonbeaver 10 months ago
@MrEatonbeaver My point is the democrats dont give a shit about me either.I am so sick of you left wing cocksuckers insulting those who disagree with your view.You leftist claim to care about me, the middle class working man but in reallity you care about far leftist issues nothing more.At least I know where I stand with republicans.I have to sit here and listen to democrats say they care about me.As for violence.The left is as violent as you get if you disagree with them asshole.
jays2474 10 months ago
@jays2474 Your are as stupid as joe the "plummer", and as the rule is in the plumber business, of plumbers's, the shit floats to top.
All Olbermann did was state a fact: shit for brains joe does not have a license. He did not advocate that he was required to have one, albeit he would if he were to own a business as such. However, since joe's tax's under Obama have gone down (or at least remained the same), what's news on his buying of this business. Just like a sheep of the fixed channel.
walkermydawg 10 months ago
What is an additional thousand dollars from your pocket.... in comparison to 250 thousand dollars.... maybe a penny in comparison to a dollar..
Maybe you're a bit out of touch..
RedPandaBoy 3 years ago
You do realize that income tax doesn't include savings... it depends on yearly income. If you save up 250 thousand dollars, it won't be taxed.
You will only be taxed if you're making 250 dollars per year..
RedPandaBoy 3 years ago
You concentrate on income in the same way the tax system does. Taxable income is not the amount you keep. Make 250k in a year - have 223k of expenses that are not considered business write offs, and get TAXED on 250k. Whatever interest you make on savings gets taxed at a higher % rate than the interest rate. That is why saving alone without additional investment is not a retirement plan...
marklross2 3 years ago
But Obama's tax plan will only tax the income you keep.
If you have 223K expensive, that wouldn't be considered under Obama's tax plan. I believe that would be the gross revenue.. not the profit (the part the owner actually keeps).
I don't think you know enough about Obama's tax plan to criticize it..
RedPandaBoy 3 years ago
No - LIVING EXPENSES!!! Living expenses are not written off. You make 250 - get taxed on 250 - but during the same year, you spent 200 on living expenses that are not tax write offs...The government doesn't pay your mortgage. You might be able to claim the interest, but that's all. You want your son or daughter to take piano lessons or not? You can't have the government pay for that, and on and on...
marklross2 3 years ago
first off... no one spends 200K on living expenses.. I was in the context of business expenses... If you do spend 200K on living, you matter well be buying a home every year while you're at it.
Second, I never said it would be written off.. However, if you reinvest in you business, that money won't be taxed... you would get a tax cut..
The context of taxation falls under "Obama's tax plan".. If you're not going to stay in that frame, any discussion would be pointless.
RedPandaBoy 3 years ago
and lets not forget, as you said, it's only an extra 1,000 dollars, so thats the difference between taking home 160,000 and 159,000 after taxes, roughly. are you really so greedy that you'd complain about only having 159 thousand dollars a year? breaking it down further, that's over 60 dollars an hour, is that something to cry over?
chaoszieg 3 years ago
No, you're not taking into account the total tax amount. And you are ignoring the fact that the extra grand is already spoken for in additional expenses that mean you don't actually keep the entire grand. Unless you choose to deny yourself the additional luxuries that money could have bought, or trade off expanding your business by spending some or all that extra grand. See? That's at the heart of the argument. It is the question as to whether you hold in regard most of your fellow citizens..
marklross2 3 years ago
to be intelligent and compassionate enough to decide how to spend the money they earn, or if you distrust your fellow man in such matters that you feel safer allowing the GOVERMENT to make those spending decisions instead. The paradox - the GOVERNMENT is comprised of as many if not more fallible, self-interested, greedy, and some good - PEOPLE..
marklross2 3 years ago
I am indeed taking it in. 33% tax on 250,000 83,000 leaving you 167,000 you said yourself, 30k over means an extra 1K in taxes. and tax would be 11k roughly, so fine, you have 156k a year. Hardly a boohoo. I work for a small business owner BTW and may take it over when he retires
chaoszieg 3 years ago
156k - fine - How much of that does he now keep? How much MUST he reinvest? How much in living expenses does he have? How much does he really end up with? The point is - focus on the extra 1100. Why don't you trust Joe to spend that money correctly, but expect that Chriss Dodd or Barney Frank will?
marklross2 3 years ago
except Hoe doesnt plan on buying the business, and the owner has no plans on selling it to him, so you're wrong, and all your points are invalid
chaoszieg 3 years ago
No, first you don't know that for fact. You're taking KO's word for it Even if it were not happening, the question joe asked would still be valid as hypothetic...
marklross2 3 years ago
it is valid, but Joe said Obama's tax plan would be more helpful to him after Obama explained it, and he likes the sounds of it better, though he still fully supports McCain, but the whole arguements falls apart when Joe says Obama's plan is better
chaoszieg 3 years ago
Yes, Øbama's plan is better for all those who are satisfied to stay within their tax bracket and not try to strive to better themselves...I will grant you that..
marklross2 3 years ago
yes, because people who better themselves vastly, cannot afford to help their country a little more.
chaoszieg 3 years ago
I don't know what people you know...but successful people I know realize their success, although mostly a result of their hard work, is also partly due to the environment this great country provides them in which to operate, and because they are intelligent, recognize this fact, and give back to the country...
marklross2 3 years ago