Labels, labels, labels. Is Africa being flooded with non-Africans, who go around insisting on how they should or shouldn't be labeled? Is China being flooded with non-Chinese, who go around insisting on how they should or shouldn't be labeled? Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone? The label for that is "genocide". Anti-racism is code language for anti-White. Of course you're a sister or friend or whatever. Genocide is illegal.
okay i see in this chat that some of you are debating over the issues of why cant gays give blood? and it needs to be asked but at least the red cross is TRYING maybe not the best way and maybe not successful but at least TRYING and i like the video if i could write my own labels or get out of being labeled at all it would be amazing and if i coud get rid of the worlds prejudice against how some people look i would in a heart beat but hey i get what i have and im glad to see that they are trying
Hey everyone! I'm conducting a project for my French class, involving one simple question: What does beauty mean to you? Please go to my channel and reply with a video or a comment!
In today Germany systematic maltreatment of children is organized by the state and executed by snitchers.The psychiatric literature holds many reports of jewish children having been persecuted in exactly this way.Since WW2 psychiatry was regularly misused by Germany to discredit and persecute the NAZI victims.Germany pretended to pay compensation to get the former victims into the hand of shrinks certifying them being mental cases due to persecution.Sometimes they even got some 100$ compensation
I love the message that this video is sending out. I also thing its completely ridiculous that the red cross is the organization behind it. Or I guess I could be wrong, after all not allowing someone to donate blood simply because they're gay isn't discriminatory at all.
@bentkneecreative Hey, it's not hypocritical AT ALL! Everyone knows that all the gays have AIDS. In much the same way that girls who go home with random strangers every weekend and are too drunk to practice safe sex are actually immune from all STDs, and thus not restricted from giving blood. Because that totally makes sense.
@jaynekrempin ....Incorrect, but even girls who have unprotected sex are asked about their partners & if they have had sex with multiple partners. It is much more cost effective to exclude a (small) group in our society from donating blood, than it is to go through screening for HIV / AIDS and risk someone catching it from a blood donation. When they find a cheap, easy &100 % accurate screen for HIV then it might be appropriate 2 allow people in higher risk groups to donate blood
Love the new redcross TVC about Discrimination Sux. F U Redcross - thats the most blatant form of hypocrisy I have seen in a long time - How bout letting gay/homosexuals give blood to save peoples lives. That way we can also help save human lives. Your correct REDCROSS, Discrimination Sux... - but blatant segregation is just plain fucked.
Cool video. I reckon the Red Cross could pay heed to its own preaching here when its comes to labelling and excluding gay men from donating blood. ;-)
The Blood Service is required by legislation to screen blood donors on the basis of declared issues; that is, issues which could put their blood at risk of carrying infection. For example, if they could potentially have been exposed to Mad Cow disease (in the UK), hepatitis (if they've had a tattoo), or HIV (if they've had male to male sex) then the Blood Service is required not to take a blood donation.
Labels, labels, labels. Is Africa being flooded with non-Africans, who go around insisting on how they should or shouldn't be labeled? Is China being flooded with non-Chinese, who go around insisting on how they should or shouldn't be labeled? Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone? The label for that is "genocide". Anti-racism is code language for anti-White. Of course you're a sister or friend or whatever. Genocide is illegal.
laetior 2 weeks ago
is it only me, or does the first guy look like Jesus?
thedecimateddreams 3 weeks ago
^__^ What a beautiful video!
YildizOsmanli 2 months ago
Greaat video. :3
RubyAvery1313 3 months ago
okay i see in this chat that some of you are debating over the issues of why cant gays give blood? and it needs to be asked but at least the red cross is TRYING maybe not the best way and maybe not successful but at least TRYING and i like the video if i could write my own labels or get out of being labeled at all it would be amazing and if i coud get rid of the worlds prejudice against how some people look i would in a heart beat but hey i get what i have and im glad to see that they are trying
OpenMindsAreKey181 4 months ago
Hey everyone! I'm conducting a project for my French class, involving one simple question: What does beauty mean to you? Please go to my channel and reply with a video or a comment!
beautybeaute 4 months ago
so, this is for the red cross. trying to stop labels. trying to create equality. so why cant gays give blood?
YoureJustADaydream 5 months ago
In today Germany systematic maltreatment of children is organized by the state and executed by snitchers.The psychiatric literature holds many reports of jewish children having been persecuted in exactly this way.Since WW2 psychiatry was regularly misused by Germany to discredit and persecute the NAZI victims.Germany pretended to pay compensation to get the former victims into the hand of shrinks certifying them being mental cases due to persecution.Sometimes they even got some 100$ compensation
wwwtotalitaerde 6 months ago
I would like it 1000000000000 times if I could. Nice video.
SaudiaQatifeyah 8 months ago
If only we could choose our own labels...
Then EVERYONE could be even more hypocrite than they are now. What a world would that be, eh? :)
Cepesh 1 year ago 7
Love.
gaby1455 1 year ago
This is the best advert ever :)
taylah155 1 year ago
I am so using these. thanks red cross
dlix 1 year ago
hahaha these are hilarious, i never even considered curry muncher.
1Durp2Durp 1 year ago
O hai, Red Cross! The 1980s called and they want their public health policies back. Kthxbai!
jaynekrempin 1 year ago
I love the message that this video is sending out. I also thing its completely ridiculous that the red cross is the organization behind it. Or I guess I could be wrong, after all not allowing someone to donate blood simply because they're gay isn't discriminatory at all.
dms041788 1 year ago
@dms041788 think* comment fail.
dms041788 1 year ago
@AustralianSounds - Only gay people can get HIV!? Why didn't they tell me that in sex ed?
TheJayfa 1 year ago
Hypocrites.
bentkneecreative 1 year ago
@bentkneecreative Hey, it's not hypocritical AT ALL! Everyone knows that all the gays have AIDS. In much the same way that girls who go home with random strangers every weekend and are too drunk to practice safe sex are actually immune from all STDs, and thus not restricted from giving blood. Because that totally makes sense.
jaynekrempin 1 year ago
@jaynekrempin ....Incorrect, but even girls who have unprotected sex are asked about their partners & if they have had sex with multiple partners. It is much more cost effective to exclude a (small) group in our society from donating blood, than it is to go through screening for HIV / AIDS and risk someone catching it from a blood donation. When they find a cheap, easy &100 % accurate screen for HIV then it might be appropriate 2 allow people in higher risk groups to donate blood
caryn61 1 year ago
Love the new redcross TVC about Discrimination Sux. F U Redcross - thats the most blatant form of hypocrisy I have seen in a long time - How bout letting gay/homosexuals give blood to save peoples lives. That way we can also help save human lives. Your correct REDCROSS, Discrimination Sux... - but blatant segregation is just plain fucked.
redwelshguy 1 year ago
Cool video. I reckon the Red Cross could pay heed to its own preaching here when its comes to labelling and excluding gay men from donating blood. ;-)
keepingitreelblog 1 year ago 27
@keepingitreelblog
The Blood Service is required by legislation to screen blood donors on the basis of declared issues; that is, issues which could put their blood at risk of carrying infection. For example, if they could potentially have been exposed to Mad Cow disease (in the UK), hepatitis (if they've had a tattoo), or HIV (if they've had male to male sex) then the Blood Service is required not to take a blood donation.
r0cksinp0ckets 1 month ago
Really good, totally true
KatyCullen09 1 year ago
awesome stuff. spread the word on this peeps!
threewishes88 1 year ago
Fantastic
sinclurm 1 year ago