WTF THIS SAME THING HAPPENED IN THE LAST MOVIE. They work there ASSES off to get what they need, and by the time they are done working and get what they need, the person they were working for dies. MOTHER FUCKER.
3:24 WTF IS GOING ON HOW DARE THEY LEAVE AN OLD MAN ALONE?!?!? HOW?! I MEAN, LOOK AT THAT OLD MAN, HE'S GOT PUPPY EYES AND HE'S LIKE "WHAT THE HELL MAN, I THOUGHT WE WERE BUDDIES!"
Damn. Haven't cried that hard in a while. Seriously, I'm never complaining about stupid stuff like not having any chips left again. Really puts things in perspective.
As a side note, I love how no one seems to know history anymore, or the fact that there's always bias, edits, and fabrication in what's taught to you. Can we all just agree that war is bullshit and terrible and this should never happen to innocent kids, regardless of which "side" they happen to from?
I understand that the whole moral of this is to stand up whenever you get stepped on, but if I was in Gen's place, I would be having a mental breakdown long before this point. poor guy :'(
People, don't point fingers at other nationalities. USA this Japan that blah blah blah. Put the blame on the powerful idiots that put humanity in this situation. People saying Japan this, USA that. . it's because of idiots like you that war exists in the first place.
...WW2 and its' horrors happened- & there isn't a damn thing anyone alive now
can &/or may do about it. It's done. Yet, there are options left for the succeeding generations to follow: Keep on distrusting & hating each other- which should eventually bring about another, even greater conflagration. Or. Settle your differences & make sure it can never occur again. This is a tall order- Given the current state of world political/economic/religious affairs. However, the latter, isn't impossible.
Awsome animation, very expressive drawing. The story is very sad though,made me cry a lot...Gen is the perfect exemple of resilience. Thanks for posting this very touching story.
If we did not drop the atomic bomb, we would have to invade japan, wich would cost millions of live. of american soliers and japanese civilians. only under 200,000 japanese were killed in the bomb drops. so the atomic bomb was the only true option.
@TheMatthess why ppl love to use numbers in everything? U are so superficialist that nothing is about individual, only about numbers. U Ppl are so insensitive to others pain that u have to use numbers as sensacionalism.
And stop speaking of that bomb you all, this is not the message the writter wanted to transmit.
@TheMatthess I won't talk like a gangsta to you saying bad words as I'm used to, but i can't believe that you're saying this! The best option was not attack Japan! OK, I know a little about Pearl Harbor, but the Hiroshima people was not guilty of this. Look, I'm brazilian not japanese but I can imagine all pain that plenty of families felt. Now, the final question: Would you like to replace someone in Hiroshima in that day?
I'm sure you wouldn't! So the bomb wasn't the only true option.
@SuperJacker45 listen Japan wouldnt surrender unless we were on the steps of Tokyo. would you rather 2 million die than u nder 200,000 think about it. oh and another option was to stop and draw a cease fire with Japan wich they wont do, so the bomb was the only option. the japanese trained thier civilians to attack american soldiers million would have died on both sides
@SuperJacker45 They commited a massive holocaust on asia, russia was going to destroy the entire country, the japanese government was extremely desperate and was going to fight to the death. The only way for america to prevent this was to scare everyone out of fighting, which worked.
@DarPower1 your wrong america and japan were in a war mostly becaus ethey were in hard times and america stopped trading with them so they got pissed and bombed pearl harbor so that they wouldn't have arial support etc. THE WHOLE OF AMERICA GOT PISSED AND PIKKA GO BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!
@mamaneww Wrong. We had plemty. A kamakaze attack onna harbor doesnt do anything, other than piss us off. We already took the Japanese islands, they were flying the american flag. But japan wouldnt stop fighting, so we nukee them and prevented ww3.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
REMEMBER PEARL HARBOR, IWO JIMA, OKINAWA; MIDWAY; GUADACANAL; AND THE BATAN DEATH MARCH; THATS WHY WE DROPED THE ATOMIC BOMBS; YOU LITTLE BRAT!!!!! WISH WE DROPED ONE ON TOKYO AS WELLL!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA AND REMEMBER ALL THE AMERICAN LIVES LOST!!!!!!
@redskins1111 I see you're the only one who pressed the dislike button.
And war is not to be justified under any circumstances, as in Hiroshima's case a great deal of civilians were killed even if they had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor and the like. It is the armies and governments behind all those terrible decisions, and yet civilians die for their actions.
As long there are humans, there will be war because we really don't learn anything from our differences and build a better future.
@mystarwarstv I want to read everybody manga Bearfoot gen.Animemovie is not enough!! Gen is angry to War and all japanese and American war man of power !! mangabook is carrying Japan's bad history in Asia and America's didthings all in Hiroshima Nagasaki.now on sell in US from 2009.Anime's story is end,but surviver is not ending, they are living now too! みなさん、原爆と戦争をこの世からなくしましょう。
@Achalel The surprise attack upon Pearl Harbor without a formal declaration of war, as required by the Hague Conventions, would be a sufficient answer. After that every despicable act, repeated again and again.against all decency, usages of war and international law, would give the other answer.
Sorry for you but with your track record you were utterly untrustworthy and had to be bombed into submission, and quite a few of you, but far too few, hanged at the end of it. Including your emperor.
@Achalel You'll find that international law has become more restrictive since 1945. What was permissible then would not be permissible now. The 1977 treaty tries to codify the limits on attacks on civilian objects which support military purposes (e.g ports such as Nagasaki's) to minimize adverse outcomes. Still it acknowledges civilian objects can be (and always have been) legitimate targets in warfare.
Why would the allies not continue to attack Japan, rather than use atomic bombs 1/2
@Achalel As they had no reason to trust Japan's sincerity in negotiations given its history of duplicity, naturally they would have kept attacking it, incurring whatever casualties they had to, to force its surrender. Japan's casualties would, of course, have been disproportionately greater.
As to allied civilian casualties, leaving aside the Chinese the Japanese were massacring under the Three Alls policy there were the allied POWs and interned civilians the Japanese planned to massacre.
@Achalel Just how many Allied servicemen and civilians, the proper concern of the Allied leaders, would have died in the intervening period until Japan got around to giving its unconditional surrender in the winter of 1945?
Every day saved by bringing the war to a rapid end was a day on which Allied lives were saved. Any saving of Japanese life as well was nice but irrelevant
Also the Allies did not request unconditional surrender. They demanded it.
@Achalel The terms on offer to Japan were unconditional surrender, nothing else.
These quite reasonable terms were what Japan agreed to.
There was no guarantee of the preservation of the imperial house and under MacArthur's constitution the emperor was left as an utterly powerless symbol of the State. He could have hanged him if he wanted to.
Read Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, Article 52, you ignorant bastard.
That was international law from 1977. It was a lot broader in 1945.
@Achalel The issue in international law is the proportionality of the number of civilian casualties to the attacking army's anticipated direct and concrete military advantage from it.
As the objective of the bombing was to induce Japan’s surrender and avoid the expected hundreds of thousands of Allied casualties from an invasion it meets this test
By the way the 2nd General Army was close enough to ground zero for two thirds of its members, about 30,000, to be killed by the Hiroshima bomb.
@Achalel You are under a misapprehension that only soldiers or military formations can be legitimate military targets at international law. That is wrong Anything that contributes to the enemy’s capacity to wage war is a legitimate target. This includes its merchant ships, munitions factories, oil refineries, bridges, railways, docks and communications hubs. Nagasaki was a port city with numerous munitions factories contributing to Japan’s war effort. That made it a legitimate target.
@Achalel under international law the targeting of civilians is prohibited . But if the enemy conceals his army among the civilian population, using them as human shields, say by placing its army in the centre of a city, it is not immune from attack. Unfortunately civilians will die but if that is proportional to the attacking army's military advantage then it is not prohibited.
Not a good idea, then, to place Japan's Second General Army, under Field Marshal Hata, in Hiroshima.
@Achalel I suppose that 280 odd years of Manchurian rule with European depredations from the mid 19th century, and Japanese from the late 19th century, and thirty years of warlords would make for a pretty wretched history.
Your military/civilian distinction is false where armies are raised through conscription as they were in WW2. Soldiers are equally citizens of their own countries as civilians. The issue then is who is the aggressor. In WW2 Japan was and reaped the whirlwind.
WW2 is not all about H and N and your wish it would be, so that Japan can have victimhood conferred upon it, is a sentiment which is contemptuous of Japan's history and the Japanese spirit of rising against adversity, however unjust it is thought to be.
It is sad that, Japan having acted in a savage way for 14 years, you resort to gutless argument about the way its reign of terror ended.
You are not a proud son of Nippon. Your ancestors would be ashamed of you.
@Achalel Two more comments: My mother was a nurse in the Australian Army in WW2. She told me of nursing a Japanese officer (one of the few captured before the war ended, I suppose) and asking about the cruelty to Allied POWs by the Japanese.
She said that he told her that many of the guards were Koreans and were brutal/ uncivilized/ low class people.
He was probably a decent person and he was decently treated as a POW in Australia. It is pathetic that Japan did not treat its POWs the same way.
@Achalel, yes, China's history between the end of WW2 and the death of Mao and then Deng's reforms was wretched. But you are the person whose Youtube site used to contain a quote from Mao crediting the Japanese for the coming to power of the Communist Party in China so I'm not sure that you should accuse anyone else of hypocrisy.
And true about the Koreans in the IJA. My mother would agree with you. But they wouldn't have been in the IJA if the Japanese had not invaded their country in 1910.
@Achalel if you ask the Koreans and the Chinese they'll soon tell you who the bloodthirsty foreign power was. The US provocation was to put an embargo on oil to stop the Japanese war machine in China. Tough for Japan that it was silly enough to attack the US.
The terms for Japan's surrender weren't unrealistic. After all the Japanese agreed to them, with a bit of prompting.
The Japanese were treated better by the US during the Occupation than they'd ever been treated by their own government.
@Achalel the war would have ended earlier if the Japanese had accepted the Allies entirely reasonable terms for ending it, their unconditional surrender in complete disgrace, with their entire nation and everyone in it, including the emperor, being subject to the unlimited power and authority of the Allied powers, earlier than when they finally did, on 14 August 1945.
The terms they accepted in surrendering did not include retaining the emperor.
@Achalel Why would you look for the US to declassify Konoe's offer. It was not made in February 1945, when he first proposed the idea to the emperor, only to be dismissed, but July, when he finally received the emperor's authority to make it, and it was made to the Russians, through whom the Japanese sought mediation. The Russians, planning war on Japan, fobbed him off. So if you want to find Konoe's offer look in Japan's archives, and those of Russia, not those of the US.
@Achalel This is what Wikipedia says of Konoe's peace proposal in February 1945 (not January)
"Konoe played a role in the fall of the Tōjō government in 1944. In February 1945, during the first private audience he had been allowed in three years he advised the Emperor to begin negotiations to end World War II. According to Grand Chamberlain Hisanori Fujita, Hirohito, still looking for a tennozan (a great victory), firmly rejected Konoe's recommendation."
@Achalel I asked for citations that show that the govermnent of japan and not just one one pathetic little sponger and his hangers-on sued for peace. That was what required to end the war.
Japan did not give that until 10 August 1945. Even then the sponger had to convince the gangsters who ruled him that the game was up.
But why do I have to tell you this?
You have admitted the same yourself.
It's sad that so many people died before those pathetic chaacters realised their game was up.
@Achalel where did Japan, in January 1945 , present its terms of surrender to the Allied Powers for their consideration?
History has no record of it.
Can you provde citations showing that the Government of Japan,and not just one one pathetic little sponger and his hangers-on, afraid that just retrribution would catch up with them, made this offer to the representatives of the sovereign people of the Allied powers on whose part they made war and to whom they were accountable to end the war?
No-one except you and your psychopath friend who thinks Chinese people are subhuman, and with whom you share an aeroplane modelling hobby, thinks as you do no matter how many times you spam Youtube to spread your fascist opinions.
The evil regime your heroes sought to impose on Asia was brought to an end.
The Japanese people were given their freedom charter by the Potsdam Declaration, which the Allies faithfully followed.
You are a free and rich nation today because of it
@Achalel either way, it would help if these debates were more nice. I mean, come on! To me, debates should be like a rap battle, people shouldn't take things as an offense so much, and at the end of the "argument", they shake hands and leave. When Angkor0 replied to my "highly rated" comment in a childish way, I responded back in a childish way, and for that I feel ashamed. I lowered myself down to his level.
@Achalel since the Japanese engaged in live human vivisection and resorted to cannibalism as part of their war effort what other word could be used about the Japanese but savages?
Wake up to yourself. Japan acted disgustingly in WW2. That is the Japan that you are trying to defend and paint as innocent victims.
No other nation, except perhaps North Korea, could be so despicable in its self-delusion.
You faced the just retribution of the world in ending WW2.
@Achalel we have your view on Colonel Paul Tibbetts.
Now what about your views on Japan's Unit 731 who committed live vivisection on Chinese and other people?
I know that you have ducked and weaved about admitting that the Japanese ever did anything wrong in WW2, saying only that you were not in favour of everything they did , but how about answering the question:
Shouldn't they have been viviisected alive as to get an understanding of what they did to tens of thousands of other people?
the people who commit such crimes against humanity must either be wiped out, or taught a good lesson while they are young. The men who piloted the enola gay should have known what type of pain and suffering they were about to cause on innocent people, yet they still dropped the bomb. This world will never change.
@parkour2693 they dont really have a choice. you shouldnt blame the pilots of the enola, rather blame the officers who orderd the dropping of the bomb in the first place
@Angkor0 Hey retard, get a life, don't be a gay sucker who harasses people! What's your problem with their opinion? Truth hurts?:)) Get out of your dirty house, get a job, a fat wife, and let people alone, obsessed prick! Skinny sociopath!:)))
@ANashuu I would not be posting here except that that troll Achalel decided to spam me on a single comment I made. He goes around harassing people. I follow him and correct his idiocy.
He's the retarded one. He doesn't know much about Japanese history.
It's nice of you to call me skinny though. I take care of my weight but I'm not quite skinny yet.
@Angkor0 :))) Yeah good one! Keep trying maybe you will get a job! I'm not Korean but i think they are nice people, and by far more educated and smart than the rednecks!:)
@Angkor0 *cough* Oops, looks like I provoked an idiot spammer who really should get a life without getting angry at other peoples opinions. These types of people really shouldn't be on youtube, and they probably wouldn't be able to hold a proper debate. Oh well, I guess that youtube is the home of the spammers. If you try to waste my time, I will block you. Goodbye troll and have a nice day(or not)
@parkour2693 Your opinion is just the pathetic opinion of an ignorant self-satisfied person who says in his magisterial self-importance:
"the people who commit such crimes against humanity must either be wiped out, or taught a good lesson while they are young." I am sure that you are so deficient of knowledge of WW2 and the circumstances of the dropping of the bombs that you could not conduct yourself for a moment in an intelligent debate. That won't stop you from being smug and ignorant.
@Angkor0 so you searched my comments eh? pretty good, I see what you do, you look at what people say and what's on their profile and use it against them.
p.s. I'm a freakin noob at this sh*t! I am joining the debate club so I could learn(and probably get my ass kicked), peace!
@parkour2693 You have a problem if I have searched your comments? Why?
If I did that and used them against you, you have a problem with that? Why?
That's part of reseaching for a debate.
If you are serious read up on WW2. It was a terrible time where terrible things were done. Of those terrible things the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were among the least of them.
Terrible though they were, they were legal at the time and justified in the morality of the times and they ended the WW2.
As you research what happened in WW2 you will find that it was a time of horrfic cruelty. This is specifically true of the Japanese whose murderous behaviour was incomprehensible to the allied people upon whom they had inflicted their atrocities.
The Allied response was savage and brutal. The Allies laid waste their cities, children and all, in order to stop their rampage of killing and to force them to surrender. It is sad but it saved many lives.
@Angkor0 you're welcome. However, the use of nukes by the United States also triggered a cold war, and a nuclear arms race, there should have been another way to get Japan to surrender, in a more peaceful way. To have countries with nuclear bombs ready to use is just utterly ridiculous. If WWIII were to ever break out, you would see alot of events similiar to Hiroshhima and Nagasaki, which is just plain horrible.
But the United States' immediate concern was to end the war it was in with the least loss of life, most especially those of its citizens, whose deaths, it reasonably esimated, would be in the hundreds of thousands if it invaded Japan to end the war.
With that imperative it had little time to speculate on what would happen later.
You mention that there should have been a more peaceful way to end the war.
@Angkor0 Yeah, they could have withdrawn from Japanese soil, or offered a conditional surrender. There is nothing cruel about that. If the U.S. had made a truce, then other countries would view America as a merciful country, and not a country that would blow civilians up.
@parkour2693 at the time the only Japanese soil they were on were the islands of Iwo Jima and Okinawa. Meanwhile the Japanese were in Korea, Manchuria, China, Indochina, Thailand, Burma, Malaya, the Dutch East Indies and a number of Pacific islands, showing no sign of wanting to surrender. What conditions for surrender could the US offer? The Japanese plan was for negotiated terms in which they kept much of the territory they held. Would that have been merciful to Koreans, Chinese or Formosans?
@Angkor0 and you keep mentioning that the U.S. would have had to invade Japan to end the war, and the loss of life would be in the thousands, which is the most overused excuse in American history.
Given that Japan was already losing the war, and running out of resources,do you possibly think that America would have lost this many men? How do you think the enola gay even flew into Japan without being blown to bits, by Japan's "strong" defense?
@parkour2693 The estimated loss of life in the event of a US invasion was in the millions, mostly Japanese. American deaths were estimated in the hundreds of thousands, estimates made from their experience in invading Iwo Jima and Okinawa. Do you really think you are better informed than the American planners for the invasion?
After the war the Americans found that the Japanese had held back over 5000 planes for kamikaze attacks on the invasion fleet, much more than the 2800 they had estimated
@Angkor0 Also, Japanese soldiers weren't really willing to fight to the death according to the invasion of Manchuria where over 600,000 Japanese soldiers had actually surrendered to the Soviet Union. Which also means that they could have surrendered to the U.S. if given the chance. They were already losing, it was only a matter of time.
The 600,000 Japanese soldiers in Manchuria surrendered to the Soviets on 16 August 1945, the day after the Emperor announced Japan's unconditional surrender following the atomic bombings. Their emperor had ordered them to by imperial rescript.
They couldn't have surrendered to the Americans who were not in Manchuria.
However in the following weeks all over Asia Japanese armies surrendered quietly to the Allied powers. The bombs had done their work.
it was so sad... i cant belive his mum die like that. its like come on! cant that boy have atleast one of his family members stay alive?! and why do they keep making those damn bombs!! its not right!! how could you do that to someone?! even if they are your enemys!! thats so cruel... most of those people didnt do anything wrong... if you had to do that to anyone, doit to the damn emporor, and not the people!!
I was born in 1987. I first watched Barefoot Gen 1 in about 1995 in my village. But suddenly the lights were off and I could watch toon after atomic bomb explosion. Only yesterday I remembered that toon and searched it in the internet. Yesterday I watched 1983, and today - 1986. This is very strong historic toon. I liked it so much! Wanna say to all politicians of the world stop war especially atomic war.
Yeah. It's just so dumb how we continue to make those bombs to this day. Our politicians and businessmen in America say that they can be used to defend our country, but that isn't defense, it's a counter attack! A bigass shield, now THATS what we should be doing.
Love this film puts my emotions through such loop. When all the preciousness in their world seems gone it comes back stronger than ever. Never give up. : )
And turns out that old man was actually Morgan Freeman.
EruAquila 2 days ago
WTF THIS SAME THING HAPPENED IN THE LAST MOVIE. They work there ASSES off to get what they need, and by the time they are done working and get what they need, the person they were working for dies. MOTHER FUCKER.
MizuWolf003 4 weeks ago
The old man probably walked after them:) so they waited for him :)
rakanishut 1 month ago 2
But didnt gen have 2 older brothers as well? who did raise him =? as in the book=?
rakanishut 1 month ago
First and second serial opend my eyes, omg this is masterpice!!!
Domagoj176 1 month ago
What assholes :s
98bennyj 1 month ago
It sad that the baby died in the 1st one, but tragidies are suppose to be something to learn, not to be haunted and suffer from.
animeslayerg 2 months ago
I thought the sequences from the first one was awesome, I still kind of love the countinuity of the story taking place in the end of WWII.
animeslayerg 2 months ago
I'm glad it ended in a positive note. I wouldnt stop crying!
theACfan4ever 3 months ago
3:24 WTF IS GOING ON HOW DARE THEY LEAVE AN OLD MAN ALONE?!?!? HOW?! I MEAN, LOOK AT THAT OLD MAN, HE'S GOT PUPPY EYES AND HE'S LIKE "WHAT THE HELL MAN, I THOUGHT WE WERE BUDDIES!"
ladylpara 4 months ago 2
Great and wonderful story a great thank you for posting this video both the first and this second part great thanks.
Saura74 4 months ago
i just relized something... hes wering shoes
joeypie96 5 months ago 2
OMG !! I can't stop myself from crying... I'm such a sensitive person....
Aleksandar998 5 months ago
@Aleksandar998 things hapend
MrMarkingston 5 months ago
Wait what happened to the baby girl that was born after the first Barefoot gen i never saw her.
Mariofan14832 6 months ago
@Mariofan14832
You mean Gen's little sister? Ummm...to be blunt, she ended up dying.
guitaristtlw 6 months ago
@guitaristtlw T-T makes the story even worse.
Mariofan14832 6 months ago
@guitaristtlw How? I never remembered seeing anything happen to her in the first film. She's never mention here.
CactusClothesline 6 months ago
@CactusClothesline She died of malnutrition. The mom couldn't produce milk, and Gen came home with powdered milk too late, the baby was dead.
kmcrmr 5 months ago
Is there a 3rd film or this is the last one
Ryanchopper12 6 months ago
Such a happy song, for running with your mom in a box... hmmm
bigmankralc 6 months ago 2
Damn. Haven't cried that hard in a while. Seriously, I'm never complaining about stupid stuff like not having any chips left again. Really puts things in perspective.
As a side note, I love how no one seems to know history anymore, or the fact that there's always bias, edits, and fabrication in what's taught to you. Can we all just agree that war is bullshit and terrible and this should never happen to innocent kids, regardless of which "side" they happen to from?
PorcelainToys 7 months ago 8
I understand that the whole moral of this is to stand up whenever you get stepped on, but if I was in Gen's place, I would be having a mental breakdown long before this point. poor guy :'(
Agentseaturtle 9 months ago 3
アメリカには無い本物のスピリット伝わたかな？
musasiizumu 9 months ago
People, don't point fingers at other nationalities. USA this Japan that blah blah blah. Put the blame on the powerful idiots that put humanity in this situation. People saying Japan this, USA that. . it's because of idiots like you that war exists in the first place.
emiliotube01 10 months ago 11
...WW2 and its' horrors happened- & there isn't a damn thing anyone alive now
can &/or may do about it. It's done. Yet, there are options left for the succeeding generations to follow: Keep on distrusting & hating each other- which should eventually bring about another, even greater conflagration. Or. Settle your differences & make sure it can never occur again. This is a tall order- Given the current state of world political/economic/religious affairs. However, the latter, isn't impossible.
SittingMooseShaman 10 months ago
nice movie i cant believe i was about to cry though
falzarboy12 11 months ago
「無印」も「２」もなんて良いアニソンなんだ…内容も昔、学校で強制的に見せられた鬱アニメ版「はだしのゲン」と比べようも無い良作。こっちを見せるべき。
"It is not an elderly person that creates the future. "
YOKO999999 1 year ago
Awsome animation, very expressive drawing. The story is very sad though,made me cry a lot...Gen is the perfect exemple of resilience. Thanks for posting this very touching story.
devolutionone 1 year ago
If we did not drop the atomic bomb, we would have to invade japan, wich would cost millions of live. of american soliers and japanese civilians. only under 200,000 japanese were killed in the bomb drops. so the atomic bomb was the only true option.
TheMatthess 1 year ago
@TheMatthess why ppl love to use numbers in everything? U are so superficialist that nothing is about individual, only about numbers. U Ppl are so insensitive to others pain that u have to use numbers as sensacionalism.
And stop speaking of that bomb you all, this is not the message the writter wanted to transmit.
PequenaAlice 1 year ago
@PequenaAlice u ppl know nothing in history the Japa were ruthless, so much that even te Nazi's were stunned
TheMatthess 11 months ago
@TheMatthess this is not a pissing contest you douche.
emiliotube01 10 months ago
@PequenaAlice u ppl know nothing, the Japs were ruthless. even the Nazi's were stunned by thier tatics
TheMatthess 11 months ago
@TheMatthess I won't talk like a gangsta to you saying bad words as I'm used to, but i can't believe that you're saying this! The best option was not attack Japan! OK, I know a little about Pearl Harbor, but the Hiroshima people was not guilty of this. Look, I'm brazilian not japanese but I can imagine all pain that plenty of families felt. Now, the final question: Would you like to replace someone in Hiroshima in that day?
I'm sure you wouldn't! So the bomb wasn't the only true option.
SuperJacker45 1 year ago
@SuperJacker45 listen Japan wouldnt surrender unless we were on the steps of Tokyo. would you rather 2 million die than u nder 200,000 think about it. oh and another option was to stop and draw a cease fire with Japan wich they wont do, so the bomb was the only option. the japanese trained thier civilians to attack american soldiers million would have died on both sides
TheMatthess 11 months ago
@TheMatthess USA should've attacked only that japaneses planning to attack USA, but never children and women.
SuperJacker45 11 months ago
@SuperJacker45 They commited a massive holocaust on asia, russia was going to destroy the entire country, the japanese government was extremely desperate and was going to fight to the death. The only way for america to prevent this was to scare everyone out of fighting, which worked.
DarPower1 9 months ago
@DarPower1 your wrong america and japan were in a war mostly becaus ethey were in hard times and america stopped trading with them so they got pissed and bombed pearl harbor so that they wouldn't have arial support etc. THE WHOLE OF AMERICA GOT PISSED AND PIKKA GO BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!
mamaneww 7 months ago
@mamaneww Wrong. We had plemty. A kamakaze attack onna harbor doesnt do anything, other than piss us off. We already took the Japanese islands, they were flying the american flag. But japan wouldnt stop fighting, so we nukee them and prevented ww3.
DarPower1 7 months ago
@DarPower1 they bombed pearl harbor to cripple their air support but they obviously failed
mamaneww 7 months ago
@mamaneww They bombed pearl harbor to cripple our pacific navy :P.. which in the end backfired on them.
coolm3productionsXD 6 months ago
WHAT ASSHOLE PUTS A DISLIKE HUH WHY?
MegaRandomthing 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
REMEMBER PEARL HARBOR, IWO JIMA, OKINAWA; MIDWAY; GUADACANAL; AND THE BATAN DEATH MARCH; THATS WHY WE DROPED THE ATOMIC BOMBS; YOU LITTLE BRAT!!!!! WISH WE DROPED ONE ON TOKYO AS WELLL!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA AND REMEMBER ALL THE AMERICAN LIVES LOST!!!!!!
redskins1111 1 year ago
@redskins1111 I see you're the only one who pressed the dislike button.
And war is not to be justified under any circumstances, as in Hiroshima's case a great deal of civilians were killed even if they had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor and the like. It is the armies and governments behind all those terrible decisions, and yet civilians die for their actions.
As long there are humans, there will be war because we really don't learn anything from our differences and build a better future.
Shadowii2 1 year ago
how do you get the sound track for this anime?
BlasianWolfJean 1 year ago
Comment removed
mi622na 1 year ago
its wierd how I got to the Barefoot Gen series from "Funny Military Accidents". This was a "Military Accident" that was plain horrible.
MarineSim09 1 year ago 2
@MarineSim09 i got here from a first look at mars war from mmohut think about that
SkeletonSarge 1 year ago
i dont know which one was better barefoot gen 1 or barefoot gen 2?
ALLERTORLOVER69 1 year ago
Oh man. it really is a good anime
achalter 1 year ago
Now we wait for Barefoot Gen 3
mystarwarstv 1 year ago
@mystarwarstv I want to read everybody manga Bearfoot gen.Animemovie is not enough!! Gen is angry to War and all japanese and American war man of power !! mangabook is carrying Japan's bad history in Asia and America's didthings all in Hiroshima Nagasaki.now on sell in US from 2009.Anime's story is end,but surviver is not ending, they are living now too! みなさん、原爆と戦争をこの世からなくしましょう。
mi622na 1 year ago
(reflects a moment)....wait how did i get here from listening to 8-bit music....
Someonewholovesmusi1 1 year ago
感動した！！素晴らしい！ブラボー☆俺は麦にはなれないけど、稲くらいにはなれるかも知れん！！
gokiburikingsite 1 year ago
@Achalel lol, you guys are still going at it. Pure awesomeness
parkour2693 1 year ago
What a bunch of assholes, they left the old man behind because he can't run fast. lol
CruxisAurion 1 year ago 26
@Achalel The surprise attack upon Pearl Harbor without a formal declaration of war, as required by the Hague Conventions, would be a sufficient answer. After that every despicable act, repeated again and again.against all decency, usages of war and international law, would give the other answer.
Sorry for you but with your track record you were utterly untrustworthy and had to be bombed into submission, and quite a few of you, but far too few, hanged at the end of it. Including your emperor.
Angkor0 1 year ago
Japan pays the price on starting the war and killing people more than the 2 cities they sacrificed.
aegisukiyashun 1 year ago
and so they ran that day, and left the old man to die
CaffeinnatedPenguin 1 year ago 34
@CaffeinnatedPenguin the old man wanted to die
wertylok 1 year ago
@CaffeinnatedPenguin your an idiot =P
PCM07Navy 6 months ago
@Achalel You'll find that international law has become more restrictive since 1945. What was permissible then would not be permissible now. The 1977 treaty tries to codify the limits on attacks on civilian objects which support military purposes (e.g ports such as Nagasaki's) to minimize adverse outcomes. Still it acknowledges civilian objects can be (and always have been) legitimate targets in warfare.
Why would the allies not continue to attack Japan, rather than use atomic bombs 1/2
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel As they had no reason to trust Japan's sincerity in negotiations given its history of duplicity, naturally they would have kept attacking it, incurring whatever casualties they had to, to force its surrender. Japan's casualties would, of course, have been disproportionately greater.
As to allied civilian casualties, leaving aside the Chinese the Japanese were massacring under the Three Alls policy there were the allied POWs and interned civilians the Japanese planned to massacre.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel Just how many Allied servicemen and civilians, the proper concern of the Allied leaders, would have died in the intervening period until Japan got around to giving its unconditional surrender in the winter of 1945?
Every day saved by bringing the war to a rapid end was a day on which Allied lives were saved. Any saving of Japanese life as well was nice but irrelevant
Also the Allies did not request unconditional surrender. They demanded it.
And took the necessary steps to get it
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel The terms on offer to Japan were unconditional surrender, nothing else.
These quite reasonable terms were what Japan agreed to.
There was no guarantee of the preservation of the imperial house and under MacArthur's constitution the emperor was left as an utterly powerless symbol of the State. He could have hanged him if he wanted to.
Read Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, Article 52, you ignorant bastard.
That was international law from 1977. It was a lot broader in 1945.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel The issue in international law is the proportionality of the number of civilian casualties to the attacking army's anticipated direct and concrete military advantage from it.
As the objective of the bombing was to induce Japan’s surrender and avoid the expected hundreds of thousands of Allied casualties from an invasion it meets this test
By the way the 2nd General Army was close enough to ground zero for two thirds of its members, about 30,000, to be killed by the Hiroshima bomb.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel You are under a misapprehension that only soldiers or military formations can be legitimate military targets at international law. That is wrong Anything that contributes to the enemy’s capacity to wage war is a legitimate target. This includes its merchant ships, munitions factories, oil refineries, bridges, railways, docks and communications hubs. Nagasaki was a port city with numerous munitions factories contributing to Japan’s war effort. That made it a legitimate target.
1/2
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel under international law the targeting of civilians is prohibited . But if the enemy conceals his army among the civilian population, using them as human shields, say by placing its army in the centre of a city, it is not immune from attack. Unfortunately civilians will die but if that is proportional to the attacking army's military advantage then it is not prohibited.
Not a good idea, then, to place Japan's Second General Army, under Field Marshal Hata, in Hiroshima.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel I suppose that 280 odd years of Manchurian rule with European depredations from the mid 19th century, and Japanese from the late 19th century, and thirty years of warlords would make for a pretty wretched history.
Your military/civilian distinction is false where armies are raised through conscription as they were in WW2. Soldiers are equally citizens of their own countries as civilians. The issue then is who is the aggressor. In WW2 Japan was and reaped the whirlwind.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel My second comment.
WW2 is not all about H and N and your wish it would be, so that Japan can have victimhood conferred upon it, is a sentiment which is contemptuous of Japan's history and the Japanese spirit of rising against adversity, however unjust it is thought to be.
It is sad that, Japan having acted in a savage way for 14 years, you resort to gutless argument about the way its reign of terror ended.
You are not a proud son of Nippon. Your ancestors would be ashamed of you.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel Two more comments: My mother was a nurse in the Australian Army in WW2. She told me of nursing a Japanese officer (one of the few captured before the war ended, I suppose) and asking about the cruelty to Allied POWs by the Japanese.
She said that he told her that many of the guards were Koreans and were brutal/ uncivilized/ low class people.
He was probably a decent person and he was decently treated as a POW in Australia. It is pathetic that Japan did not treat its POWs the same way.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel, yes, China's history between the end of WW2 and the death of Mao and then Deng's reforms was wretched. But you are the person whose Youtube site used to contain a quote from Mao crediting the Japanese for the coming to power of the Communist Party in China so I'm not sure that you should accuse anyone else of hypocrisy.
And true about the Koreans in the IJA. My mother would agree with you. But they wouldn't have been in the IJA if the Japanese had not invaded their country in 1910.
Angkor0 1 year ago
...They left the old man.
KayBirDee 1 year ago
@Achalel if you ask the Koreans and the Chinese they'll soon tell you who the bloodthirsty foreign power was. The US provocation was to put an embargo on oil to stop the Japanese war machine in China. Tough for Japan that it was silly enough to attack the US.
The terms for Japan's surrender weren't unrealistic. After all the Japanese agreed to them, with a bit of prompting.
The Japanese were treated better by the US during the Occupation than they'd ever been treated by their own government.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel the war would have ended earlier if the Japanese had accepted the Allies entirely reasonable terms for ending it, their unconditional surrender in complete disgrace, with their entire nation and everyone in it, including the emperor, being subject to the unlimited power and authority of the Allied powers, earlier than when they finally did, on 14 August 1945.
The terms they accepted in surrendering did not include retaining the emperor.
He was kept on afterwards as an Allied lapdog.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel Why would you look for the US to declassify Konoe's offer. It was not made in February 1945, when he first proposed the idea to the emperor, only to be dismissed, but July, when he finally received the emperor's authority to make it, and it was made to the Russians, through whom the Japanese sought mediation. The Russians, planning war on Japan, fobbed him off. So if you want to find Konoe's offer look in Japan's archives, and those of Russia, not those of the US.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel This is what Wikipedia says of Konoe's peace proposal in February 1945 (not January)
"Konoe played a role in the fall of the Tōjō government in 1944. In February 1945, during the first private audience he had been allowed in three years he advised the Emperor to begin negotiations to end World War II. According to Grand Chamberlain Hisanori Fujita, Hirohito, still looking for a tennozan (a great victory), firmly rejected Konoe's recommendation."
So much for Hirohito's full support.
Angkor0 1 year ago
this one & the first one is the only movie that makes me cry T-T
Warzel258 1 year ago
@Achalel I asked for citations that show that the govermnent of japan and not just one one pathetic little sponger and his hangers-on sued for peace. That was what required to end the war.
Japan did not give that until 10 August 1945. Even then the sponger had to convince the gangsters who ruled him that the game was up.
But why do I have to tell you this?
You have admitted the same yourself.
It's sad that so many people died before those pathetic chaacters realised their game was up.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel where did Japan, in January 1945 , present its terms of surrender to the Allied Powers for their consideration?
History has no record of it.
Can you provde citations showing that the Government of Japan,and not just one one pathetic little sponger and his hangers-on, afraid that just retrribution would catch up with them, made this offer to the representatives of the sovereign people of the Allied powers on whose part they made war and to whom they were accountable to end the war?
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel
No-one except you and your psychopath friend who thinks Chinese people are subhuman, and with whom you share an aeroplane modelling hobby, thinks as you do no matter how many times you spam Youtube to spread your fascist opinions.
The evil regime your heroes sought to impose on Asia was brought to an end.
The Japanese people were given their freedom charter by the Potsdam Declaration, which the Allies faithfully followed.
You are a free and rich nation today because of it
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel either way, it would help if these debates were more nice. I mean, come on! To me, debates should be like a rap battle, people shouldn't take things as an offense so much, and at the end of the "argument", they shake hands and leave. When Angkor0 replied to my "highly rated" comment in a childish way, I responded back in a childish way, and for that I feel ashamed. I lowered myself down to his level.
parkour2693 1 year ago
@Achalel :))
ANashuu 1 year ago
@Achalel Man, don't bother with that prick,he is retarded!
ANashuu 1 year ago
@Achalel since the Japanese engaged in live human vivisection and resorted to cannibalism as part of their war effort what other word could be used about the Japanese but savages?
Wake up to yourself. Japan acted disgustingly in WW2. That is the Japan that you are trying to defend and paint as innocent victims.
No other nation, except perhaps North Korea, could be so despicable in its self-delusion.
You faced the just retribution of the world in ending WW2.
Get over it.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel they were paid by the Japanese, your people, to do the despicable things they did.
No civilized people would do that. But the Japanese did. Only the worst of animals would act that way.
You are savages, brought low by an outraged civilized world commmunity because of your criminal activity.
Be grateful that the world tolerates you and is kind to you, because it is superior to you and therefore knows how to behave, even with animals.
You don't deserve its kindness.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel we have your view on Colonel Paul Tibbetts.
Now what about your views on Japan's Unit 731 who committed live vivisection on Chinese and other people?
I know that you have ducked and weaved about admitting that the Japanese ever did anything wrong in WW2, saying only that you were not in favour of everything they did , but how about answering the question:
Shouldn't they have been viviisected alive as to get an understanding of what they did to tens of thousands of other people?
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Achalel don't say things like that! regardless of what any man have done, no one desirves a punishment like that!
smilgropan 1 year ago
such a touching movie it teachers us to be brave i love the movie.
coolz987 1 year ago
AW MAN! I really liked the mom
bananaman2157 1 year ago
I think it's a box that Gen is holding Kimie clothes or something.
RSop63 1 year ago
@RSop63
Kimie's ashes are in the box.
Ogopogo57 1 year ago
I blame both too!
RSop63 1 year ago
@RSop63 word up
parkour2693 1 year ago
Gen: Mum, you're so light now. you are really light.
Me: I'm sorry Gen.
RSop63 1 year ago
I guess this means Gen's got a new family right guys?
RSop63 1 year ago
It's because the old man is too old to run & race right?
RSop63 1 year ago
You know Barefoot Gen & Barefoot Gen 2 is for adults & you guys are adults right?
RSop63 1 year ago
Comment removed
RSop63 1 year ago
The american war from barefoot gen, but it's only a movie!
RSop63 1 year ago
This is just like the part when Timoko dies & Gen was too late to save her!
RSop63 1 year ago
Here lies The mother of Barefoot Gen R.I.P.
RSop63 1 year ago
they left the old man
kaijutube 1 year ago 7
omg... Why can't I stop crying? Q_Q
vinkie35 1 year ago 3
Gen has got to be THE MOST optimistic character I've ever seen in a cartoon.
This movie was awesome 100/10
kiraragirl200 1 year ago 6
the people who commit such crimes against humanity must either be wiped out, or taught a good lesson while they are young. The men who piloted the enola gay should have known what type of pain and suffering they were about to cause on innocent people, yet they still dropped the bomb. This world will never change.
parkour2693 1 year ago
@parkour2693 they dont really have a choice. you shouldnt blame the pilots of the enola, rather blame the officers who orderd the dropping of the bomb in the first place
1987Challenger3 1 year ago 3
@1987Challenger3 I blame both
parkour2693 1 year ago 6
@parkour2693
as the name says, enola gay, the pilot of that goddamn plane was indeed gay. the biggest gay. he deserves a big torture
34enes 1 year ago 5
@34enes lol
parkour2693 1 year ago 7
@parkour2693 Was there a bit of iodine deficiency in your early childhood which has affected your brain development?
Read up on the stark realities that the Allies faced before they decided to drop the bombs to end the war.
Then you might make an informed comment and not that of a retard.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Angkor0 Hey retard, get a life, don't be a gay sucker who harasses people! What's your problem with their opinion? Truth hurts?:)) Get out of your dirty house, get a job, a fat wife, and let people alone, obsessed prick! Skinny sociopath!:)))
ANashuu 1 year ago
@ANashuu I would not be posting here except that that troll Achalel decided to spam me on a single comment I made. He goes around harassing people. I follow him and correct his idiocy.
He's the retarded one. He doesn't know much about Japanese history.
It's nice of you to call me skinny though. I take care of my weight but I'm not quite skinny yet.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Angkor0 Spammer!
ANashuu 1 year ago
@ANashuu You live in Barcelona?
So you were able to convince them that you were Korean after all.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Angkor0 :))) Yeah good one! Keep trying maybe you will get a job! I'm not Korean but i think they are nice people, and by far more educated and smart than the rednecks!:)
ANashuu 1 year ago
@Angkor0 *cough* Oops, looks like I provoked an idiot spammer who really should get a life without getting angry at other peoples opinions. These types of people really shouldn't be on youtube, and they probably wouldn't be able to hold a proper debate. Oh well, I guess that youtube is the home of the spammers. If you try to waste my time, I will block you. Goodbye troll and have a nice day(or not)
parkour2693 1 year ago
@parkour2693 Your opinion is just the pathetic opinion of an ignorant self-satisfied person who says in his magisterial self-importance:
"the people who commit such crimes against humanity must either be wiped out, or taught a good lesson while they are young." I am sure that you are so deficient of knowledge of WW2 and the circumstances of the dropping of the bombs that you could not conduct yourself for a moment in an intelligent debate. That won't stop you from being smug and ignorant.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Angkor0 so you searched my comments eh? pretty good, I see what you do, you look at what people say and what's on their profile and use it against them.
p.s. I'm a freakin noob at this sh*t! I am joining the debate club so I could learn(and probably get my ass kicked), peace!
parkour2693 1 year ago
@parkour2693 You have a problem if I have searched your comments? Why?
If I did that and used them against you, you have a problem with that? Why?
That's part of reseaching for a debate.
If you are serious read up on WW2. It was a terrible time where terrible things were done. Of those terrible things the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were among the least of them.
Terrible though they were, they were legal at the time and justified in the morality of the times and they ended the WW2.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Angkor0 Actually, I don't have a problem, thats what debaters do.
parkour2693 1 year ago
@parkour2693 thanks for your comment.
As you research what happened in WW2 you will find that it was a time of horrfic cruelty. This is specifically true of the Japanese whose murderous behaviour was incomprehensible to the allied people upon whom they had inflicted their atrocities.
The Allied response was savage and brutal. The Allies laid waste their cities, children and all, in order to stop their rampage of killing and to force them to surrender. It is sad but it saved many lives.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Angkor0 you're welcome. However, the use of nukes by the United States also triggered a cold war, and a nuclear arms race, there should have been another way to get Japan to surrender, in a more peaceful way. To have countries with nuclear bombs ready to use is just utterly ridiculous. If WWIII were to ever break out, you would see alot of events similiar to Hiroshhima and Nagasaki, which is just plain horrible.
parkour2693 1 year ago
@parkour2693 What you say is true.
But the United States' immediate concern was to end the war it was in with the least loss of life, most especially those of its citizens, whose deaths, it reasonably esimated, would be in the hundreds of thousands if it invaded Japan to end the war.
With that imperative it had little time to speculate on what would happen later.
You mention that there should have been a more peaceful way to end the war.
What was it?
Would it have been any less cruel?
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Angkor0 Yeah, they could have withdrawn from Japanese soil, or offered a conditional surrender. There is nothing cruel about that. If the U.S. had made a truce, then other countries would view America as a merciful country, and not a country that would blow civilians up.
parkour2693 1 year ago
@parkour2693 at the time the only Japanese soil they were on were the islands of Iwo Jima and Okinawa. Meanwhile the Japanese were in Korea, Manchuria, China, Indochina, Thailand, Burma, Malaya, the Dutch East Indies and a number of Pacific islands, showing no sign of wanting to surrender. What conditions for surrender could the US offer? The Japanese plan was for negotiated terms in which they kept much of the territory they held. Would that have been merciful to Koreans, Chinese or Formosans?
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Angkor0 and you keep mentioning that the U.S. would have had to invade Japan to end the war, and the loss of life would be in the thousands, which is the most overused excuse in American history.
Given that Japan was already losing the war, and running out of resources,do you possibly think that America would have lost this many men? How do you think the enola gay even flew into Japan without being blown to bits, by Japan's "strong" defense?
parkour2693 1 year ago
@parkour2693 The estimated loss of life in the event of a US invasion was in the millions, mostly Japanese. American deaths were estimated in the hundreds of thousands, estimates made from their experience in invading Iwo Jima and Okinawa. Do you really think you are better informed than the American planners for the invasion?
After the war the Americans found that the Japanese had held back over 5000 planes for kamikaze attacks on the invasion fleet, much more than the 2800 they had estimated
Angkor0 1 year ago 2
@Angkor0 Also, Japanese soldiers weren't really willing to fight to the death according to the invasion of Manchuria where over 600,000 Japanese soldiers had actually surrendered to the Soviet Union. Which also means that they could have surrendered to the U.S. if given the chance. They were already losing, it was only a matter of time.
parkour2693 1 year ago
@parkour2693 Of course they surrendered.
The 600,000 Japanese soldiers in Manchuria surrendered to the Soviets on 16 August 1945, the day after the Emperor announced Japan's unconditional surrender following the atomic bombings. Their emperor had ordered them to by imperial rescript.
They couldn't have surrendered to the Americans who were not in Manchuria.
However in the following weeks all over Asia Japanese armies surrendered quietly to the Allied powers. The bombs had done their work.
Angkor0 1 year ago
@Angkor0 Absolutely Marvelous, this is like the third or fourth back-to-back debate I have ever had, thanks man.
parkour2693 1 year ago
@Angkor0 I really hate the youtube character limit, it pointless.
parkour2693 1 year ago
This is the 5th time I see this scene and still cry. : (
TyrohneEnt 1 year ago
How appropriate that cherry blossoms are falling at that moment. :'(
Caterfree10 1 year ago
and to think I was comforted by the fact that at the end of the first film, he still had his mother...
Treemeadow 1 year ago 4
The barefoot gen movies are the only movies that make a happy ending despite some of the worst shit thrown in the characters faces.
ps3tony1 1 year ago
did anyone notice how long the kids were running? O-o they were running for like HOURS!!! O.O
Alice19thLover 1 year ago
@Alice19thLover LOL i was about to make a comment saying that! XD
lolquendo5 1 year ago
@lolquendo5 XD LOOOOLL!!!
Alice19thLover 1 year ago
@Alice19thLover OMG LMFAO (sarcasm)
dzgfdg 1 year ago
it was so sad... i cant belive his mum die like that. its like come on! cant that boy have atleast one of his family members stay alive?! and why do they keep making those damn bombs!! its not right!! how could you do that to someone?! even if they are your enemys!! thats so cruel... most of those people didnt do anything wrong... if you had to do that to anyone, doit to the damn emporor, and not the people!!
jashinsama136 1 year ago 6
@jashinsama136 it would have been better if the americans caputered and torutred the emporer instead of dropping the bombs.
cheesyegg87 1 year ago 3
this was amazing
MajorX9999 2 years ago
I was born in 1987. I first watched Barefoot Gen 1 in about 1995 in my village. But suddenly the lights were off and I could watch toon after atomic bomb explosion. Only yesterday I remembered that toon and searched it in the internet. Yesterday I watched 1983, and today - 1986. This is very strong historic toon. I liked it so much! Wanna say to all politicians of the world stop war especially atomic war.
GeorgiaXXIcentury 2 years ago 6
Yeah. It's just so dumb how we continue to make those bombs to this day. Our politicians and businessmen in America say that they can be used to defend our country, but that isn't defense, it's a counter attack! A bigass shield, now THATS what we should be doing.
Eekolu 2 years ago 8
@Eekolu its like throwing the shield at the enemy hoping it would deck them in the head
nocturned85 1 year ago
One word...wow. 10 of 10...
TyrohneEnt 2 years ago
so sad.. i cried... thanks a lot for uploading...
lolitamoriflores15 2 years ago 5
good movie
hellmasterx 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Very good film
tonyamalika 2 years ago
why do i watch these movies, they all make me cry lol. like grave of the fireflies n all :( , but they are all soo good :)
creultothedarkness 2 years ago
thanks for uploading
I love it when movies touch your heart
PS: great ending :)
Cyraxone 2 years ago 15
Your welcome :)
arnolddisco 2 years ago
The two Barefoot gen movies almost made me cried, so touching, and heartbreaking in both of them.
Great movies,
PocketMonstersFreak 2 years ago 4
Love this film puts my emotions through such loop. When all the preciousness in their world seems gone it comes back stronger than ever. Never give up. : )
Suorrel 2 years ago 3
Yay! I was so happy to find another Barefoot Gen movie! Not as good as the 1st, but still good. T_T So good.
LionsLamb5 2 years ago
I disagree...I find his one just as touching and heart-rending as the first... I also enjoyed the different approach of the animation style...
animationeer 2 years ago 6
w00t first comment! 8D Awesome movie, thanxx 4 posting ^.^
FirestormSonamy 2 years ago 6