Added: 3 years ago
From: SECHTDAMON666
Views: 258,197
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (937)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The math is wrong in the first scene

  • Worst director Gus Van Sant !!!

  • Janet Lee looks a lot better than Anne Heche.

  • looks so lame, why did they bother? 'ooooo we got better tech now lets do it better!' vanity fail if u ask me

  • WORST REMAKE EVER

  • @kailee87 I agree and I bet the Alfred Hitchcock would be rolling in his grave

  • But like... did she die?

  • the original one is way better. NO DOUBT

  • for how many times she got stabbed there was like almost no blood

  • that's fucking awful, Hitchcock would be outraged if he saw that

  • this is so fucking bad. certain filming techniques (especially for action scenes) that were used back in the day DON'T work today, nor did it in 1998 for that matter. it's just looks bastardized.

  • @cloud041089 Why not?

  • @StefStrife why not what? i posted two comments.

  • LOL this jat made me laugh!! XD the old one is way better!! :o

  • I love her hair ^^

  • that last part with the decomposed body scared the crap out of me!

  • It's quite possible this remake would have still existed if then original Hitchcock one didn't. Sounds a bit strange for me to say that, doesn't it?

  • @solidmario1 not in this form it wouldn't. since you know, it's a shot-for-shot remake down to the camera angles...

  • the 1960 version is better

  • Did anyone else just find this remake totally pointless..? And what was with those bizarre stock storm clouds..?

  • @MSam2 Yes, the remake sucked. btw the storm clouds are supposed to be an insight to Norman Bates' mind. There are other weird stock shots during the other murder scenes

  • If they ever remake Psycho (which I kinda hope they do and don't) they should make it black and white.....and find better actors these guys made the movie so awkward

  • @mspudds22

    they remade it...it's horrible.

  • @ISeeAnIdiot I know I mean if history tries to repeat itself they should do a better job or better yet leave it alone

  • @mspudds22

    yeah like Nostalgia Critic said : "Vince Vaught as Norman Bates....FAIL."

  • A lot of what made the original creepy and suspenseful was the lack of color. Hitchcock chose to shoot in black and white for a reason, even though color film had already become available. The overuse of color (okay.....and the not-so-great acting) in this newer version takes away a ton of the "pizazz" and darkness that the original had. Just my opinion.

  • The Knife Doesn´t have any Blood On it !!!

    :@

  • 2:55 XD

  • she should have screamed more..

  • this is so bad...

  • 2:53 FAIL DOWN

  • 2:23 Dog pose was :D

  • 2:03

  • the 1960 version was better

  • it's about time someone put that crazy sexually confused woman out of her misery! lol Hmmm, i wonder if it was Ellen behind that grey wig.

  • Psycho 1998 is the only DVD i threw into a dumpster. Horrible piece of shit.

  • @texasB666 Then why are you here? 

  • wtf why is the knife so clean after stabbing someone? o__O hahhaha

  • what is this shit

  • This was a remake shot by shot of the original. But if you notice the shot @ 3:55 where the focus shifts to the newspaper on the nightstand, in the original there is an ashtray next to it. Gotta love that political correctness!

  • The blood looked more real when it was in black and white than this scene

  • Comment removed

  • Why did they make this...

  • Worst remake ever. Who the fuck thought it was a good idea to stare vincint vaughn as norman bates.

  • 0:38

    f.y.i.-The first time a toilet was shown flushing in a movie...oh wait...wrong movie...

  • The rights of Hitchcock's films were acquired in 1997 or 1998 by Universal and they began remaking the films in order to pay tribute to the late Alfred Hitchcock on his Centennial Birthday in 1999. The Psycho 1998 remake was just to pay homage to the original film.

  • @MultiJames95 I don't think that is right - there were 3 sequels produced in the 1980s, 2 that were in theatres and 1 that was a made for TV movie (the best sequel imo). A pilot for a possible tv-series was also made but has never been released to DVD to my knowledge. The films starred Anthony Perkins the TV pilot did not. In 1998, after Van Sant won the academy award he had carte blanche to do whatever he wanted and one thing he wanted to do was a shot for shot remake of Psycho.

  • Nothing that I've ever read ever alluded to it being made in relation to his centennial, although a number of very good books came out at that time discussing Hitchcock's work.

  • so this guy made a copy from the original movie shot by shot.. he certainly can be proud of HIS work...

  • The music sample from 0:22 has got a busta rhymes ! 8-)

    Busta Rhymes - Gimme Some More

  • One of the worst movies/remakes ever made.

  • how is it that a 1998 movie has worse special effects than a 1960 movie?

  • that's why i lock the door and i don't have a curtain lol

  • doesn't beat Hitchcocks original

  • I imagine the people in 1998 thinking about watching a horror movie like Scream, Friday the 13th or other modern movie and they only got a stupid remake :$

  • Hahahahaha

  • too much blood for an unwounded body

  • Who here wanted to punch Gus Van Sant in the face after watching this movie?

  • @dvdreview1 I want to do more than that! You probably know that he [pretty much]plagiarizred the whole movie. Alfred Hitchcock was done a real disservice.

  • @carchavtube Indeed it is. This movie is an insult to Alfred Hitchcock and movies overall.

  • @dvdreview1 He so messed up a classic

  • THIS MOVIE IS SOO SCALLY!! omgg ...... NOT -_-"

  • I believe that the trailer for this film was one of the biggest things that killed this movie. It gave away the plot twist that Norman Bates is insane. This movie was doomed before it even got into theatres.

  • I hate black and white movies

  • i, for one, feel that this one was better.

    

  • What is this? It's like they turned the original into colour and put new actors in! Anybody else find that? Only problem was they couldn't make it as good could they?

  • Why the hell was it necessary to remake a film shot-by-shot?

  • This version is pretty crap:/ can never ever beat the original!!

  • what happened to her pupils

  • This movie's horrible. The original 1960 film is the real classic. You don't have to fix something that's not even broken in the first place.

  • Comment removed

  • @YourOneAndOnlyDavid You're even crazier than Norman if you're actually being serious.

  • @TheDman147100 sorry didn't write this, and if i were being serious that would be pretty sick xD

  • @YourOneAndOnlyDavid Ok, i understand, don't worry about it, dude.

  • La peli mas deskicia q e visto junto con freaks

  • Got to try that one. 2:52

  • el cuchillo no se llena de sangre a pesar de apuñalarla varias veces :O

    where is the blood in the knife? :O

  • lol no blood on the knife. you know that phenomenon when you shit and you wipe but nothing shows on the paper. i guess it happens with blood too

  • 2:52 yeah... I'd hit it.

  • Vince Vaughn has nothing on Anthony Perkins!!!!

  • pale copie

  • 2:54 BD

  • why the hell would anyone do a remake of psycho?

  • thumbs up if you jacked off at 2:54

  • @Feamsterr you have like seven thumbs downs, nice one creep

  • @WarThug13 it was just a joke man. :/ 

  • man the remake sucked the shower scene is fake the original is better

  • Her ass

  • preferisco 1000000 volte l'originale 

  • anne heche is awful.

  • was better black and white with the original cast.

  • why doesn't the knife get blood on it?

  • this is so copy/paste

  • is this a real movie?

    or is this just a joke?

  • Comment removed

  • @BloodyStrikePT Yeah, its a shot-for-shot remake.

  • @BloodyStrikePT - Hmm, how about a movie that's a real joke? LOL

    (What are those chains I hear rattling? It's the ghost of Alfred Hitchcock haunting Gus Van Sant for being director of this travesty of a remake.)

  • @BloodyStrikePT This is no joke. Crappy re-make of a classic made in 1998. Don't bother watching it, it's not worth it.

  • @BloodyStrikePT Real ...

    Its psycho by gus van sant (:

  • @BloodyStrikePT .Looks like a Joke

  • @BloodyStrikePT As a matter of fact, it's a remake ... with Vince Vaugh as Norman Bates. 

  • @Motorskallen Anyone who has to ask if this is a remake is an idiot or living under a rock!

  • @cjs33139 Well, not really. Maybe the companies behind this movie didn't want to promote this shit, maybe no-one really wanted to be responsibe for this piece of garbage. So if no-one has heard about it ...

  • @BloodyStrikePT it's real

  • This wasn't scary at all. It looks like a poorly edited music video.

  • why the knife doesn't have any blood? 

  • in this one i can see her ass

  • 2:53 - free porn >.<

  • dirt!!! its da exact same =/

  • Get a life! You are Alfred Hitchcock killers :( Thumbs down

  • the knife does not have any blood on it! Amazing.

  • Totally unneeded remake. For years I tried to figure out why I hated this so much-was it Anne or Vince or Van Sant?? I think the fact that it was in colour had alot to do with it. Hitchcock's variation of black and white was one of the best parts of the original-so much is conveyed without saying AS much. I have always been intrigued by the greatness of minimalism and lack of colour. Turns our focus 100% to the ambiance/emotion...and terror.

  • Seriously?

  • Porquería lamentable mal copiada.

  • cheesy

  • why there's no blood in the knife everytime she received a stab? the original version is waaaay better.

  • @epicnessh the original version doesn't have blood either... i prefer the remake...

  • Gotta love Van Sant's obsession with timelapse shots of clouds. He even managed to shoe-horn it into one of the most infamous murder scene in film history for no apparent reason :D

    I'm a huge fan of Gus Van Sant but didn't like this film. It's a cut by cut remake but fail to capture the essence of the original. But you have to admire him for doing this. Recreating a Hitchcock film is just asking for trouble. You can't recreate the work of a master even if you copy it down to the finest detail.

  • what a poor actress

  • iron bitch

  • THE VERSION SUCKS! THE ORIGINAL WAS BETTER

  • OMG WHY PEOPLE COMPLAINT TOOOOO MUCH IF YOU LIKE IT THEN COMMENT SOME POSITIVE THINGS IF YOUR NOT INTO THOSE KIND OF MOVIES THEN WHY THE HELL U WATCHING THE TRAILER !

    I RECKON HORROR MOVIES ARE THE BEST AND DOESN'T MATTER HOW MANY REMAKE THEY DO ITS STILL AMAZING TO WATCH !

  • @MsAngielina But still, the remakes pale in comparison to the classic originals!

  • Who thinks The Thing and The Fly were better remakes than this steaming heap of shit? at least they were different than their original 50's movies, they were originally these hokey low budget 50's Sci-fi horror movies with a great idea but didn't have the time or technology back then to do them justice, Cronenberg and Carpenter grew up with the originals and remade them to perfection on the execution. Psycho is a timeless treasure and needed no remake.

  • I meant Vince vaughn makes it hard....stupid spell check

  • The fact that bates is played by Vincent waiting males it hard to be scary...I just think of "the break up" everytimee I see him

  • wait, what is that at the end?

  • This chick isn't nearly as hot as Janet Leigh.

  • Theres no blood on the knife... Wth?! Worst movie mistake EVER!!

  • Why'd they copy the music?

    And they shouldn't have done a remake.

  • @Lauren72753 No they just shouldn't have done a remake at all.

  • @Lauren72753 Remakes of classics are always doomed to fail...especially in the magic world of cinema...only time probably when a remake was better than the original was "The Man Who Knew Too Much" directed again by Alfred Hitchcock himself 20 years later because we wasn't satisfied with the original '30s movie...although in my personal opinion the original is also a brilliant movie...

  • what da fuq??

  • wow alfred is smart you can tell this is so fake when he is stabbing her with knife there is no blood on knife reason why is becuz he was actually in back round stabbing water mealon

  • Damn how many stabs does it take to put her down

  • This isnt even a remake. it was just put in color.

  • absolute disgrace to filmmaking history to remake Psycho

  • Also, what's with the stabbing sounds? Doesn't even sound like someone's being stabbed. The melon and cabbage was MUCH more effective!

  • Why did they make it in colour? It was a lot more effective in black and white like the original. Also, I don't see the point of the remake if it's pretty much shot-by-shot of the original.

  • this is ridiculous!!!! i cant stop laughing!!! i was only glad for this Hickok is deceased, not to be able to see this rubbish!!!!

  • Really? This movie copied everything from the original! It copied the great music, made it cheesy... they even copied the exact camera angles! THIS MOVIE SUCKS

  • Tsk tsk tsk. Alfred Hitchcock won't be pleased of what the filmmakers did to his original Psycho movie.

  • OH MY GOSH!! They killed Ellen Degeneres!!!

  • I think that it was a fun movie, and is cool that even the daughter of Hitchcock was happy and jokin about this idea... the mistake in this film is the cast: Vince V. as Norman Bates is a big, big mistake. Also the mother with blonde hair another big mistake. I love Anne Heche as Marion Crane. Instead of the 90's, the 60's, like recreating in color those days..

  • It had horrible casting and certain clips in it werent needed I dont think he was trying to show that it couldnt be done better I just think he failed at it. No reason to waste cash just because you think someone is going to make a slasher of it. Its horrible and a waste of money peroid.

    v flawed logic...

  • The movie was conceptual art. Gus Van Sant wasn't trying to make a better version. I wouldn't be surprised if he made this movie to prove that it couldn't be done better or even to prevent some pandering slasher director like Eli Roth from making a remake.

  • my actin would have been betta than this ugh this is so bad, the oringinal ROCKS

  • lol the knife is still perfectly clean xD

  • Totally unnecessary & bad remake! BOMB!!!

  • I understand that this remake sucks, everyone has mentioned that. I got super upset when I found this clip though. Im currently watching Psycho (or at least trying) and I totally had the idea to remake it and try as hard as i could to make it the same as the original frame by frame. I'm an aspiring movie maker so thats why i thought of it in the first place. But yea, super pissed lol.

  • That was shit. OH MY GOSH THAT WAS SO SHIT. THAT SO IMMENSELY SHIT. The original was better bar far. I really cannot get over how incredibly CRAP that was. The woman couldn't even act. What the fuck was up with those dodgy facial expressions she was making. My word that was so crap and if someone opened your shower, with a knife for fucks sake, the first thing you are going to do would hardly be to gasp would it. My goodness I can't get over how shit that was. Was that directed by a 12 year old?

  • lol random clouds...

  • 2:03 side boob

  • @Kainlarsen ok your mom is a bitch your a bitch and your dead dad is a bitch

  • @funcooldrew2 Wow... took you a whole year to think up that one, did it?:D

  • Is this a remake or a spoof?

  • I can see this as a shot for shot remake as a school project but to MARKET it?....Hitchcock didn't want it in color in the first place! whose idea was this...cause its the worse i've seen. oh well well over a decade ago.

  • this woman can't act for her life.

  • THIS MOVIE SUCK

  • this looks more fake than the original 

  • @tylerf13ful That's because the actors were better.

  • @tylerf13ful atleast the blood in this clip is RED:)

  • @tylerf13ful The original (and this one) wasn't meant to look like she was actually getting stabbed. Hitchcock used artistic shots to portray the murder.

    And in my opinion, it's a hell of a lot better than today's gorey effects.

  • @tylerf13ful LOL

    I love the original but this is :-/

    I hate Norman's masturbation ;D Mastur-Bates LOL

  • every fucking movie today sucks, the only good remake is Cape Fear (1991) Scorsese is the only one who can pull that off hes the man

  • what next psycho in 3D thats a hint to peter jackson

  • So weird they almost did it cut for cut..

  • Scream 4 had it right- "never f*** with the original."

  • isnt the psycho murder killing others too?

  • @2:14 there's no blood on the knife.

  • Why are people hating so much? Its basically the exact same thing in colour. :/ Yeah, I way prefer the original, but this isnt shitty...

  • why did they bother remaking this? why didn't they just add color to the original while they were at it?

  • @Lauren72753 you are right i think making remakes are gay bullshit

  • i can understand the bad stabbing in the 60s version but in 1998 it should look more real, they really fucked this movie

  • Fuck remakes. There bullshit

  • very stupid

  • This is so dumb! Every single camera angle and movement is just copied from the original! Any bunch of idiots could go out and buy a video camera and create a "remake" if this is what it is!

  • This movie sucks! Mainly cos it's NOT a remake,it IS the original Psycho just with colour and new actors. That's it! Anyone agree?

  • at least they put blood on the wall in this one... that was one of the only problems I had with the original shower scene because it had showed her getting stabbed in the back so it seemed kind of logical that blood would smear on the wall as she slid down

  • no blood on the knife?