So Jesus is the God with Whom He is.? By itself answered yes is not yet modalism Perfect unity of Trinity is in that question.Yes Jesus is the God with Whom He is. I understand what James is doing but by itself he would be wrong to call the man a modalist.Because Oneness of Jesus being the God of Whom He is, is never autonomous.He is the God of Whom He is by Trinity. The next question so you believe that only one Person is God bang I got him.The second question yes you get him but not the first.
After they had gone I prayed asking the Lord about these things and asked Him to show me what the truth is. A little later I put my Bible in my backpack and went walking to a park that overlooked the city and sat under a tree. I prayed and opened my Bible to John chapter 1. The Lord shone a light on His word that day, it was as if I had never read it before. I wept, my tears falling on the page of John 1, I looked up and said to Jesus, "You are God".
When I was 18 I prayed one of those dumb prayers. I asked the Lord to send some Jehovas Witnesses to my door so I could give them what for. The very next morning I awoke to the sound of knocking at my door. I didn't give them what for, they gave me a hard time asking me as a new Christian, questions I didn't have answers to on the Trinity, the deity of Christ etc. I got rid of them as quickly as possible. But God in His wisdom had a greater design in this (continued)...
I believe in the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Why can't the one God of Deut. 6:4 manifest himself as 3 persons simultaneously? Is anything too hard for God? After seeing Origen's use of Plato's middle triadic schema in the development of the trinity embraced by Roman Catholicism I had to chose between the three who are one (literally) and the three in one. I chose the former based on Isa.13:6; 9:6; 44:6,8; 45:15 and Rev1:8,11,17;19:12; Deut.10:17; Psa.136:3; Rev,19:16. Check the references out
My only question would be. If what Dr. White is advocating here is true, why are 80% of trinitarians somehow falling into modalism if the totality of the scriptures clearly teach the doctrine of the trinity?
@dking2ushawty21 Because the bible clearly says the LORD our God is one LORD. Isa 9:6 the Son who is given is called The Mighty God,The Everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Isa 13:6 and 44:6 call Jehovah the Mighty God, the first and the last. In Rev.1:8,11,17 the risen Christ applies these titles to himself.The bible this one God manifest himself as Father Son and Holy Ghost.Trinitarians got eternal generation from the heretic Origen who got it from Plato and Aristotle, pagan philosophers.
@mwilson70201 they also got the messenger god the logos from those paganistic roots as well. I think philo got caught up in that stuff. And here they are believing that nonsense and arguing everyone to the ground about it today.
The trinity is often seperated by evangelicals even James White when the three are One but seperated by death in Christ.Many belivers say God died on the cross. Here White is saying Christ is a distinct person which is true but seperates God and believes the Father and Spirit can still be God when Christ dies as God on the cross. In his words bing! I got him; that is impossible.Christ in Spirit eternally God died as a Man never seperated by death as God ; is the true theology of trinity
Wow, this is so true bro, ive spoken with so many Trinitarians who speak as if they are Oneness and they don't realize it until i point it out to them. The bible speaks for itself but yet to Mr. James White its heresy, i guarantee if you take anyone new Christian and show them scriptures which talk about God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit, they will say that God is One person.
Those who say that one can't be saved without believing in the Trinity have to accept that 80% of "Trinitarian" Christians are going to Hell (assuming that that figure is accurate). What a ridiculous thing to affirm. Salvation does not depend on our intellectual understanding of the Godhead. If it did, we'd all be doomed.
Amen! Dr. White has defended the Trinity against "Oneness" theologians, Jehovah's witnesses...etc. He debated Mr. Sabin, and Sabin had no defense. He did a radio discussion with Dr. Bernard and asked him at least twice if Dr. Bernard would be open to having a 3-hour debate on this topic. I don't think Dr. Bernard ever even responded to the challenge.
Debates with people who alter the definitions of the words in the bible are usually fruitless. Why? If you corner people like White on ANY topic, they will simply try to alter the definition of the word. The most prevalent example of this is the word 'person' which we see in Hebrews 1:3, the same word used by Tertullian. That word, 'person' means substance, nature, or being.
If White said the earth was flat and I refused to debate him, would that make me wrong and make the earth flat?
Yeah, I think anyone who heard the radio "debate" between Dr. White and Dr. Bernard knows perfectly well why Dr. Bernard would not respond to a debate challenge from Dr. White. It was Dr. Bernard who could not answer questions about Scripture and had to constantly jump around to texts that were irrelevant to Dr. White's questions. This video is a perfect example of the dishonesty of the "Oneness" position. It is taken completely out of context.
Rkg, firstly, its pretty foolish that your main argument for the Trinity revolves around James White. Secondly, I myself can answer every objection that White makes and I've only studied the Bible for two years.
You are being dishonest by ascribing a 21st century, English definition to a Hebrew word used in the first and second century.
Your refusal to accurately define the terms of your doctrine Thats dishonesty. Its actually an attempt to alter the scriptures.
rkg andTriune. Check out the debate between Dr. White and Greg Stafford. Stafford is a JW which I am not, but shuts Dr. White down to the point of frustration over defineing "Greek" terms andsuch in scripture. Even the primarly "Trinitarian" audience has to laugh when Stafford starts amking jokes to ease the tension. BrotherMurray not sure what you believe, but We ssem to be on similar pages. YHWH blessings to you all!
Dr. White lost the debate against Dr. David Bernard. The concept is simple to disprove since the concept is not in the bible. Oneness theology is the correct way in which to view the godhead.
I was not aware that Dr. White and Dr. Bernard had the 3-hour debate that Dr. White challenged Dr. Bernard to in the radio interview. Did Dr. Bernard take up the challenge of Dr. White?
Yes, they debated the Oneness-Trinity, and Tongues. Its hard to try and debate someone such as Dr.Bernard, but I give him credit for trying I hope he came away learning the truth a little more.
TriuneApostolic, one of the only reasons why the KJV to me is superior to the NASB, is that James White was involved in translating the NASB. When people translate with doctrinal agendas, it compromises the accuracy.
People like James White like to re-define words though they had meant something else for 2000 years, simply because the word and its meaning are inconvenient to their doctrine.
Ironically, the NASB translates the word 'person' as used by Tertullian to mean nature or substance.
It is important to understand that some Unitarians believe that Trinitarians are "daughter churches of the Roman harlot" because we believe in the Trinity. Nothing could be further from the truth, however, as Church history testifies to the Trinitarian doctrine long before there was a Roman Catholic Church. Unitarians cannot ever seem to argue their point without building up a 'straw man'. This is just simply dishonest.
Long before the Catholic church? Not that long. It goes back to the Latin Church Fathers, namely Tertullian, Origen, and Martyr, none of which were Apostles.
Besides the plethora of Biblical examples of baptism, even the historical accounts, even one of which I know from 100 AD Rome, were done with a Jesus name baptismal formula.
A defense against the false teachings of Unitarianism and Patripassionism was the reason for the explanation of what we call the Trinity. The Trinity did not develop out of thin air, but as a defense against what could be called "Oneness" today (which is really Monarchial Modalism).
You call me a heretic and then you can not even honestly define the term which defines your doctrine? Such a defense would never need to have been made if the doctrine of the Trinity was biblical in the first place.
So the challenge remains for you to define the word 'person' as used in the bible and by tertullian. and try actually going to a concordance and not trusting a scribe or pharisee.
It was to show how much trinitarians actually hold to modelist view point of God.. I was debating to put this up or leave it up.. I think its rather educational comming right from James Whites mouth himself... As my videos have Shown I have refuted him on the eternal Sonship theolory.
@Truthorfable - the key thing here, is that White is not saying that 80% of Christians correctly believe in modalism,... his point clearly is that a great percentage is are confused about the eternal persons of God. Clearly, White is in NO WAY endorsing the heretical, modalist view of the Almighty Godhead. Jesus is the Eternal Son of God- that's not a 'theory', it's just clearly all scripture.
@FitnessMinded - certainly, he is a wonderful teacher and man of God. He would frequently appear with Mr. Ankleberg on his television program on the BIble. There is a vid of him next to this vid on the recommended vid.
It's like this guy is going on a rant and I can't understand what in the world he is talking about. LOL
What strikes me as odd is just the lengths guys like James White and John MacArthur would go to prove that the Trinity is true. I believe that whether people identify with the Oneness doctrine or Trinitarian doctrine, they are my brothers and sisters because of the fact I think we all agree that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit of the Bible can all be identified as God.
Definition of Heresy: : 1) dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice 2) adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma.
It would seem that if 70 - 80% of all people filling out a questionnaire agree with Oneness, then trinitarianism is in the minority when it is revealed what most people actually believe. That puts trinitarianism in heresy doesn't it?...LOL
So Jesus is the God with Whom He is.? By itself answered yes is not yet modalism Perfect unity of Trinity is in that question.Yes Jesus is the God with Whom He is. I understand what James is doing but by itself he would be wrong to call the man a modalist.Because Oneness of Jesus being the God of Whom He is, is never autonomous.He is the God of Whom He is by Trinity. The next question so you believe that only one Person is God bang I got him.The second question yes you get him but not the first.
polopowers1 1 month ago
(Continued...)
After they had gone I prayed asking the Lord about these things and asked Him to show me what the truth is. A little later I put my Bible in my backpack and went walking to a park that overlooked the city and sat under a tree. I prayed and opened my Bible to John chapter 1. The Lord shone a light on His word that day, it was as if I had never read it before. I wept, my tears falling on the page of John 1, I looked up and said to Jesus, "You are God".
Keruaran 1 month ago
When I was 18 I prayed one of those dumb prayers. I asked the Lord to send some Jehovas Witnesses to my door so I could give them what for. The very next morning I awoke to the sound of knocking at my door. I didn't give them what for, they gave me a hard time asking me as a new Christian, questions I didn't have answers to on the Trinity, the deity of Christ etc. I got rid of them as quickly as possible. But God in His wisdom had a greater design in this (continued)...
Keruaran 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I believe in the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Why can't the one God of Deut. 6:4 manifest himself as 3 persons simultaneously? Is anything too hard for God? After seeing Origen's use of Plato's middle triadic schema in the development of the trinity embraced by Roman Catholicism I had to chose between the three who are one (literally) and the three in one. I chose the former based on Isa.13:6; 9:6; 44:6,8; 45:15 and Rev1:8,11,17;19:12; Deut.10:17; Psa.136:3; Rev,19:16. Check the references out
mwilson70201 2 months ago
Of course Mr White completely mis-represents what the Oneness doctrine really teaches.
eflint1 2 months ago
My only question would be. If what Dr. White is advocating here is true, why are 80% of trinitarians somehow falling into modalism if the totality of the scriptures clearly teach the doctrine of the trinity?
dking2ushawty21 4 months ago
@dking2ushawty21 Because the bible clearly says the LORD our God is one LORD. Isa 9:6 the Son who is given is called The Mighty God,The Everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Isa 13:6 and 44:6 call Jehovah the Mighty God, the first and the last. In Rev.1:8,11,17 the risen Christ applies these titles to himself.The bible this one God manifest himself as Father Son and Holy Ghost.Trinitarians got eternal generation from the heretic Origen who got it from Plato and Aristotle, pagan philosophers.
mwilson70201 3 months ago
@mwilson70201 they also got the messenger god the logos from those paganistic roots as well. I think philo got caught up in that stuff. And here they are believing that nonsense and arguing everyone to the ground about it today.
dking2ushawty21 2 months ago
The trinity is often seperated by evangelicals even James White when the three are One but seperated by death in Christ.Many belivers say God died on the cross. Here White is saying Christ is a distinct person which is true but seperates God and believes the Father and Spirit can still be God when Christ dies as God on the cross. In his words bing! I got him; that is impossible.Christ in Spirit eternally God died as a Man never seperated by death as God ; is the true theology of trinity
polopowers1 7 months ago
Stop playing games. If you know the truth of the Godhead, just teach it instead of playing.
FitnessMinded 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read Matthew 27:46
Jesus said the Father forsaken, so create the truth table from the results.
Jesus felt like Father forsaken Trinity: True Oneness: True
In action the Father forsaken Trinity: True Oneness: False
Jesus is God after the Father left Trinity: True Oneness: ????
For the Old Testament jewsforjesus has your answers.
MrHellowwww1 9 months ago
Wow, this is so true bro, ive spoken with so many Trinitarians who speak as if they are Oneness and they don't realize it until i point it out to them. The bible speaks for itself but yet to Mr. James White its heresy, i guarantee if you take anyone new Christian and show them scriptures which talk about God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit, they will say that God is One person.
FalseTrinityDoctrine 1 year ago
Those who say that one can't be saved without believing in the Trinity have to accept that 80% of "Trinitarian" Christians are going to Hell (assuming that that figure is accurate). What a ridiculous thing to affirm. Salvation does not depend on our intellectual understanding of the Godhead. If it did, we'd all be doomed.
ObjectiveBob 1 year ago
Amen! Dr. White has defended the Trinity against "Oneness" theologians, Jehovah's witnesses...etc. He debated Mr. Sabin, and Sabin had no defense. He did a radio discussion with Dr. Bernard and asked him at least twice if Dr. Bernard would be open to having a 3-hour debate on this topic. I don't think Dr. Bernard ever even responded to the challenge.
rkg62976 2 years ago
Debates with people who alter the definitions of the words in the bible are usually fruitless. Why? If you corner people like White on ANY topic, they will simply try to alter the definition of the word. The most prevalent example of this is the word 'person' which we see in Hebrews 1:3, the same word used by Tertullian. That word, 'person' means substance, nature, or being.
If White said the earth was flat and I refused to debate him, would that make me wrong and make the earth flat?
BrotherMurray 2 years ago
Yeah, I think anyone who heard the radio "debate" between Dr. White and Dr. Bernard knows perfectly well why Dr. Bernard would not respond to a debate challenge from Dr. White. It was Dr. Bernard who could not answer questions about Scripture and had to constantly jump around to texts that were irrelevant to Dr. White's questions. This video is a perfect example of the dishonesty of the "Oneness" position. It is taken completely out of context.
rkg62976 2 years ago
Rkg, firstly, its pretty foolish that your main argument for the Trinity revolves around James White. Secondly, I myself can answer every objection that White makes and I've only studied the Bible for two years.
You are being dishonest by ascribing a 21st century, English definition to a Hebrew word used in the first and second century.
Your refusal to accurately define the terms of your doctrine Thats dishonesty. Its actually an attempt to alter the scriptures.
BrotherMurray 2 years ago
rkg andTriune. Check out the debate between Dr. White and Greg Stafford. Stafford is a JW which I am not, but shuts Dr. White down to the point of frustration over defineing "Greek" terms andsuch in scripture. Even the primarly "Trinitarian" audience has to laugh when Stafford starts amking jokes to ease the tension. BrotherMurray not sure what you believe, but We ssem to be on similar pages. YHWH blessings to you all!
halfie25 2 years ago
Dr. White lost the debate against Dr. David Bernard. The concept is simple to disprove since the concept is not in the bible. Oneness theology is the correct way in which to view the godhead.
dktacts23 2 years ago
I was not aware that Dr. White and Dr. Bernard had the 3-hour debate that Dr. White challenged Dr. Bernard to in the radio interview. Did Dr. Bernard take up the challenge of Dr. White?
rkg62976 2 years ago
Yes, they debated the Oneness-Trinity, and Tongues. Its hard to try and debate someone such as Dr.Bernard, but I give him credit for trying I hope he came away learning the truth a little more.
dktacts23 2 years ago
TriuneApostolic, one of the only reasons why the KJV to me is superior to the NASB, is that James White was involved in translating the NASB. When people translate with doctrinal agendas, it compromises the accuracy.
People like James White like to re-define words though they had meant something else for 2000 years, simply because the word and its meaning are inconvenient to their doctrine.
Ironically, the NASB translates the word 'person' as used by Tertullian to mean nature or substance.
BrotherMurray 2 years ago
It is important to understand that some Unitarians believe that Trinitarians are "daughter churches of the Roman harlot" because we believe in the Trinity. Nothing could be further from the truth, however, as Church history testifies to the Trinitarian doctrine long before there was a Roman Catholic Church. Unitarians cannot ever seem to argue their point without building up a 'straw man'. This is just simply dishonest.
rkg62976 2 years ago
Long before the Catholic church? Not that long. It goes back to the Latin Church Fathers, namely Tertullian, Origen, and Martyr, none of which were Apostles.
Besides the plethora of Biblical examples of baptism, even the historical accounts, even one of which I know from 100 AD Rome, were done with a Jesus name baptismal formula.
BrotherMurray 2 years ago
A defense against the false teachings of Unitarianism and Patripassionism was the reason for the explanation of what we call the Trinity. The Trinity did not develop out of thin air, but as a defense against what could be called "Oneness" today (which is really Monarchial Modalism).
rkg62976 2 years ago
You call me a heretic and then you can not even honestly define the term which defines your doctrine? Such a defense would never need to have been made if the doctrine of the Trinity was biblical in the first place.
So the challenge remains for you to define the word 'person' as used in the bible and by tertullian. and try actually going to a concordance and not trusting a scribe or pharisee.
BrotherMurray 2 years ago
What did you do bringing this guy (White) in here?
You made a mistake.
BrotherMurray 2 years ago
It was to show how much trinitarians actually hold to modelist view point of God.. I was debating to put this up or leave it up.. I think its rather educational comming right from James Whites mouth himself... As my videos have Shown I have refuted him on the eternal Sonship theolory.
In Jesus Christ name God Bless
Truthorfable 2 years ago
@Truthorfable - the key thing here, is that White is not saying that 80% of Christians correctly believe in modalism,... his point clearly is that a great percentage is are confused about the eternal persons of God. Clearly, White is in NO WAY endorsing the heretical, modalist view of the Almighty Godhead. Jesus is the Eternal Son of God- that's not a 'theory', it's just clearly all scripture.
shieldsff 1 year ago
@shieldsff Ever heard of Dr. Walter Martin?
FitnessMinded 8 months ago
@FitnessMinded - certainly, he is a wonderful teacher and man of God. He would frequently appear with Mr. Ankleberg on his television program on the BIble. There is a vid of him next to this vid on the recommended vid.
shieldsff 8 months ago
If you were to ask a question a certain way, you could get most people to believe in Modalism?
You mean to ask in a truthful way? You mean to ask questions concerning the Bible?
BrotherMurray 2 years ago
James White needs to cool his jets LOL
SupremeHero777 2 years ago 2
It's like this guy is going on a rant and I can't understand what in the world he is talking about. LOL
What strikes me as odd is just the lengths guys like James White and John MacArthur would go to prove that the Trinity is true. I believe that whether people identify with the Oneness doctrine or Trinitarian doctrine, they are my brothers and sisters because of the fact I think we all agree that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit of the Bible can all be identified as God.
LandoRigs 2 years ago
Definition of Heresy: : 1) dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice 2) adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma.
It would seem that if 70 - 80% of all people filling out a questionnaire agree with Oneness, then trinitarianism is in the minority when it is revealed what most people actually believe. That puts trinitarianism in heresy doesn't it?...LOL
ProphecyChannel 2 years ago