@21boxhead Monitor & TV distortion from magnets is different, since the magnet isn't directly distorting the light coming from the set. In the case of a CRT, it's affecting the guides inside which are used to aim the electrons from the electron gun at the screen.
Dont read this cause it actually works. You will be kissed on nearest possibly friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However if you do not pass this comment to at least 3 videos you will die within 2 days. Now youve started reading this so dont stop. This is so scary put this on at least 5 videos in 143 minutes when youre done press F6 and your lovers name will appear on the screen in big letters. This is so scary cause it actually works
Was that really necessary? The video itself is interesting (like all other astronomy videos) but when the black line broke apart I scared the shit out of me xd
The Black Hole is simply an absent of Photons or particle of Light.. which looks like it absorb lights but in reality light Rays cannot be bounce without the particle of Light. How this things happen. Black Hole was created after a Big Bang. After that blast all the particles is shattered and pushing away from Ground Zero. the force of Space compressions is only pushing back all the particles and debris into the origin of the Blast to fill in the Blank in Space.
@UnifiedPhysics So you're saying a black hole is only created by a big bang? :) Must've been ALOT of Big Bangs then!? :D.. There's 2 black holes penetrating the earth EVERY day, dude. Imagine that. You don't quite know enough to have that username, in my opinion.
Hmm... how to spot a black hole...... How aboyut go to Kanye West's house the day after the grammies? Quote from description: "Scientists explain the way to identify the most terrifying style of black hole...."
A super massive black hole will be a place with much gravity Yes, Indeed. but to get a super massive black hole you need at least power doubled from 3 suns that means like 20 out galaxies
@deathindark1 For one the sun is the star at the center of our solar system, that its name.
For two, 3 stars as big as VY Canis Majoris wouldn't come close to making a super massive black hole, and definitely not stars that are only as "strong" as 20 suns. 60 suns is absolutely nothing im comparison to a super massive black hole.
1) I dont get one thing here... sometimes it is said that all galaxies have their own blackhole and sometimes - almost all galaxies have one...
is this just some sort of editorial inconsistency or: - we say 'almost all galaxies' because we haven't investigate enough of them to back up the statement 'all'. if this is the case - fair enough...
- what happens to the pattern whereby the mass of the black hole is proportional to the mass of its galaxy
One thing that I don't like about compressed space-time grids is that they make it very difficult to see attraction between objects of the same size; imagine there were another supermassive black hole close to the other one - according to the grid both holes are lower than the space in-between and so have no inclination to move towards each other... or am I missing something?
@05swanbe I think black holes are some sort of objects with gaint amount of matter making its gravity gaint, because every matter haves gravity. So i guess they may move towards eachother/circle around eachother and maybe fuse. But im not an expert. So i could be wrong
@161803 So we, as humans, are here to define what's possible and what's not? Just because cavemen didn't know about gravity yet, doesn't mean it didn't exist, now did it?
@161803 So we, as humans, are here to define what's possible and what's not? Just because cavemen didn't know about gravity yet, doesn't mean it didn't exist, now did it?
@9hello123 well what do we really know about sgr a*? We know that it's dense, but we don't even have a coherent theory that describes black holes in a manner consistent with the standard model. Why not posit instead that what appear to us to be black holes are instead superdense exotic forms of matter? There is already some observational evidence for the existence of quark stars, which would imply a mechanism for halting the collapse of a mass to a singularity.
baloney, how do you think the galaxies spin. Every galaxy has a supermassive black in hole in the middle of them. Look on google earth and look at andromeda galaxy and look in the center of it.
black holes might be there,but as say they have infinite density,gravity ,they even gobble up light etc., might not be right because stars are not going sucked into them.
@netk91 but if you look how fast those stars are moving around the center of the galaxy. I mean a black hole breaks the laws of physics so we have no clue how they do anything. But we do know, theres only one thing in the universe strong enough to keep a galaxy spinning and thats a supermassive blackholes. Alot of black holes are dormant because they can get enough to "eat" so that why theres no jets of energy coming out of them.
so you mean black holes are eating up the galaxies? then why are galaxies existing and many galaxies should have shrunk to an observable degree from the last more than 100 years since we have been seeing them with telescopes.
@netk91 There are active ones, and there are non-active ones. Your also thinking to small. 100 years in the galaxy isnt anything. The galaxy is 13.3 billion years old. And you also have to take time dialtion into effect. The light were seeing on those pics are millions and billions years old. Thats what the telescopes see. Black holes are what scientist think are the Yang to the universes creation Ying. It all balances each other out like it should.
Dunno. Do u watch stuff about black holes often? xD. Tbh, though, stuff can come up, even if uve only searched the thing its related to once. U ever searched up the song? If so, that could be why.
@RoLLWithITOasis1 Well lol, it's the reverse for me xD. I love astronomy and all it stands for, and when I was searching for videos like this I found Muse out. Now I just LOOOOOOOVE them. My fave band of all times :p
That space time animation reminds me of those bins that you put pennies in, and the coins whirl round and round until they fall into the bin through the hole in the centre.
god i love these videos, i wish there were some going into detail about how they calculate the complicated theorys. not that i would understand it but just some explanation would be really interesting.
I was informed that physicists study only things which appear to be dead. Leaving life sciences out of their calculations. If true, woudn't this make it impossible to find the ultimate, "Theory of Everything"?
"Dead" or "Alive" has meaning for sizes like viruses, proteins, plants, animals, and even them, "Alive" or "Dead" is a very fuzzy, relative concept. At lowest sizes, "dead" and "alive" have no meaning. Trying to do physics (or even mathematics) research with "Dead" and "Alive" is just starting the wrong direction. The right direction is looking at real, measurable data, and trying to make sense of them. The wrong is trying to push this data in a religious biased framework.
" The right direction is looking at real, measurable data, and trying to make sense of them. The wrong is trying to push this data in a religious biased framework."
@monching1120 : The Graviton is an hypothetical particle, whose existence has yet to be confirmed, so your question has nothing to do with my assertion.
Sill, if we found an unknown particle with mass of zero, a spin of 2, and which affect the space/time continuum curvature, then it would be a very good candidate.
This is exactly the kind of measuring that was done to successfully confirm anti particles as well neutrino's existence 30 years after their theory.
Example: You don't see your keys. Only the light which reflects on their surface. But then, if you search for your keys, I believe seeing the light reflected on them will be sufficient for you to say "I found them".
This what will happen with the Graviton, if it is found.
In physics, is it true that is that the smaller the types of particles the greater the relative space between them? For example stars relative to their planets when compared to an atoms nucleus to its electrons etc.
And about the theory of everything: The aim is to understand "everything" by looking at its core, smallest components, and the forces that affect them, because "every thing" is composed of those smallest components. Looking at a car won't give insight about how combustion works. Looking at a computer won't give insight about how transistors work. "Life" of "life sciences" won't give insight about physics. But physics give insight about chemistry, which give in turn insight about biology...
Well actually every single scientific branch is based off of physics, as physics is basically everything. Chemistry is the study of the physics based interactions of chemicals, which then spurs on life sciences, which is just an extremely complicated form of chemistry and physics... something along those lines. If we can find the fundamental basics of physics, then we'll be able to apply those basics to everything else.
Well, the Theory of everything is a physicist theory in the first place. It's not like it opts t explain why girls bitch all the time or why plants are green. It's about matching theories about stuff on a small scale with stuff on a big scale so it explains phenomenon in the universe.
And on a second note: life is build by the same building blocks as all other matterial stuff, so it would come in handy for biologists too.
What he is saying is that the dark areas are an illusion? He just represented a 3d object on a 2d plane. What if the observer was on the same plane as the paper? Wouldn't the dark areas still be aligned as when the stars orbit slowly? Lol, his hypothesis made me laugh. This video should be located under the category science fiction entertainment.
the sound makes it sound so shocking. but I dont see what the unsymetrical line has to do with how fast the planets spin around the central black hole. since they would only spin faster if they got closer to the middle. so I have really no idea what they are trying to say in this.. small video
Humans see because of the light the objects reflecting or self-producing. For an example Neptune is 4 light hour away from us. That means if neptune would disappear suddenly at 12:00 o'clock we would see it on earth until 16:00 o'clock because the last light photon reflected from neptune takes 4 hours to come us ( into our eyes).
oh... The closest star to us is 4 light years away... so if it started heading towards us right now, we'd see it start to move around 2013. But it'd take soooo many years to get to us (it wouldn't be moving at light speed). Comets are close enough to us that we see them start to move after a few minutes to a few hours. The issue with those isn't the time for the light to reach us, it's seeing the comet. They're rather tiny and in a rather large sky.
Lol the time like we know doesnt have any importance in space. A light from a star that 13 million light year away takes exactly 13 million year to come to us. That means when you look at that star with a telescope you see its state in 13 million year ago.
one question that i have, if stars exploded long ago and we witness these black holes sucking them in now then does that mean it sucked it back then? wtf i don't get this
the light from the explosion of a star needs a certain time to get to us. If you see a star exploding right now, then it already has exploded years ago.
It´s just like thunder. In most cases you hear it long after it had been produced.
no matter what happens, you´ll se the very same thing happen a certain time later...
so yes, this event will appear to happen later, too :-)
Black holes only bend the space time right next to them (which would still be a few million to billions of miles, though :P). The light that escapes will go its way to the earth exactly the way all the other light does.
Who knows its space the mystery and the answer.Whats beyond space we just dont know. Is there a parallel side of space as known like the dark side were everything is opposite? WE JUST DONT KNOW its amazing what there is to space.
Well Know one really knows but when something enters a black hole that thing gets streched really far and once uyour in a black hole there may be no escape because not even light can get out.
black holes DO go to the other part of space but its so huge and fast it would probably destroy us all so quickly we probly would have a few secs to realize we were dieng,but we could still be alive,idk about the world being awsome anymore though
Actually, black holes only form if a star is massive enough... I don't believe or sun is. It take a super nova at the least to cause a star to condense to a black hole, and our sun will barely even nova :(
Boring ass star! Why can't you be cool like others?!
i dont think it destroys everything in our solar system at first i think its everything up to mars that is effected by the super novas i dont think it will reach jupiter im sure i heard it will cave in on itself once it gets to a certain distance then it turns into a black hole. but either way earth is fucked
So what if the earth is fucked? If a black hole came and destroyed us in the next 10 minutes we would be entirely unaware of its approach and would be obliterated in a fraction of a second. Basically, stop worrying about it.
lol i ent worring bout it, i will be well dead by then anyway its in millions of years time. we may not even make it to then anyway its a long time away.
i never said we were fucked only our planet is fucked we probly could have found somewhere else by then
I will not believe this theory without a firm evidence.
for example, Why this shift? how is this shift related to the speed of Stars (or any matter at the center of the Galexy)?
Amitknight123 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read the article on
wired.ylli.me/2012/01/power-of-supernova.html
MrMuhammadSumair 1 week ago
well...fuck
IHARTDUBSTEP 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
thesickandwounded 3 weeks ago
┗┓
StreakyTheFurry 4 weeks ago
I once fell into a black hole, then i woke up
ShadowKNighT788 1 month ago
@ShadowKNighT788 comments like yours are poisoning youtube you unoriginal scumbag
Voxerlite 1 month ago
@Voxerlite
Thank you good sir
ShadowKNighT788 1 month ago
@ShadowKNighT788 quiet scum
Voxerlite 4 weeks ago
└-------------------------------┐
Edje1953 2 months ago
Comment removed
joligra 3 months ago
That noise in the video was very creepy
Archer7Tadayoshi 4 months ago
Comment removed
StreakyTheFurry 4 months ago
Well next time I'm at the supermarket I'll see if I can see one lol.
HotToastedBread 5 months ago
Supermassive Blackholes are caused by Matt Bellamy.
alternativebassist 6 months ago
LOOKS LIKE SCARFACE SNEEZED ON YOUR CAR!
StackedSugar 6 months ago
looks like harry potter's scar ololololo
crud42 6 months ago
i'm so glad i know how too spot them now. Now i can be ready the next time those pesky supermassive black holes try too sneak up on me.
wo0obly 6 months ago
I think i have a black hole coming out of my arse
Jxsmine 6 months ago
I don't see what the big deal is. In Hollywood, black ho's suck off super-massive stars ALL THE TIME.
ShallowThoughts 6 months ago 2
proof that is not hole holes would only go one direction and there is 2 jets of gas
my theory on this is that blackhole is nothing more than a huge magnetic quasar
seeing that magnet distort color,image on Monitor,TV etc. it can distort time as well but requires a much more powerful magnet of course
21boxhead 6 months ago
@21boxhead Monitor & TV distortion from magnets is different, since the magnet isn't directly distorting the light coming from the set. In the case of a CRT, it's affecting the guides inside which are used to aim the electrons from the electron gun at the screen.
Kookas 6 months ago
Comment removed
21boxhead 6 months ago
@Kookas you can if you have the power of this so called blackholes
21boxhead 6 months ago
@21boxhead To summarize Kookas' response to you: you're a frigging idiot.
ShallowThoughts 6 months ago
l_ l
ttoommyy0011 6 months ago
I think blackholes are not destructive because earth is still here
austintex117 7 months ago
what the fuck? i was watching elmo how did this come up?!?!?!
JacksonSargent 7 months ago
@JacksonSargent Elmo's mouth is a spinning super-massive vortex. That's why all the other muppets hate him and don't spend time with him.
ShallowThoughts 6 months ago
Fake and gay :D
RabbitPig01 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dont read this cause it actually works. You will be kissed on nearest possibly friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However if you do not pass this comment to at least 3 videos you will die within 2 days. Now youve started reading this so dont stop. This is so scary put this on at least 5 videos in 143 minutes when youre done press F6 and your lovers name will appear on the screen in big letters. This is so scary cause it actually works
this wont work
kaitlin098 9 months ago
@kaitlin098 faggot
ItsNotEvenSunny 6 months ago
half a swastika :P
doglovermw 10 months ago
Damn.
Was that really necessary? The video itself is interesting (like all other astronomy videos) but when the black line broke apart I scared the shit out of me xd
charmeleon10 10 months ago 2
guys..its just norris passing by space.. :D
miahpwner 10 months ago
└┐
shwnchr 10 months ago 87
@shwnchr win
BatmanSucksMyBanana 10 months ago
@shwnchr Y YOU GET TOP COMMENT?!
kellycolburn1 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
TheDrewManXD 1 week ago
lol they made the change of the line seem so fucking creepy.
SageZane560 10 months ago 4
@SageZane560 well, black holes are scary things :3
pancakezombie13 8 months ago
ALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAH
pudinggala 11 months ago
WHAO i did not see that coming so thats probably the milkyway 100,000 Years Ago! OH CRAP!
TheHappyboy12345 1 year ago
The Black Hole is simply an absent of Photons or particle of Light.. which looks like it absorb lights but in reality light Rays cannot be bounce without the particle of Light. How this things happen. Black Hole was created after a Big Bang. After that blast all the particles is shattered and pushing away from Ground Zero. the force of Space compressions is only pushing back all the particles and debris into the origin of the Blast to fill in the Blank in Space.
UnifiedPhysics 1 year ago
@UnifiedPhysics So you're saying a black hole is only created by a big bang? :) Must've been ALOT of Big Bangs then!? :D.. There's 2 black holes penetrating the earth EVERY day, dude. Imagine that. You don't quite know enough to have that username, in my opinion.
GoodFortuneOfficial 7 months ago
i fuckying jumped when the line whent bing
zenkaizer12 1 year ago
i dont know if it was supermassive but a black hole sucked me up once for $20
1zrofan 1 year ago 26
@1zrofan ...zing....
Chrissertisfaction 1 year ago
@1zrofan hey be nice she's still my sister
wood1155 1 year ago
@1zrofan wtf
Kvokki 1 month ago
In Soviet Univers, you don`t spot supermassive black holes .... SUPER MASSIVE BLACK HOLES SPOT YOU!
dsaasdf 1 year ago 2
Hmm... how to spot a black hole...... How aboyut go to Kanye West's house the day after the grammies? Quote from description: "Scientists explain the way to identify the most terrifying style of black hole...."
IMAFISHYAY 1 year ago
A super massive black hole will be a place with much gravity Yes, Indeed. but to get a super massive black hole you need at least power doubled from 3 suns that means like 20 out galaxies
deathindark1 1 year ago
@deathindark1 power doubled from 3 suns? lol that is nowhere near enough for a supper massive black holes.
9hello123 1 year ago
@9hello123 I wrote Wrong the three Sun stars (NAMED IN OUR LANGUAGE). Like a Star that strong as 20 suns. Those three Suns :D.
deathindark1 1 year ago
@deathindark1 For one the sun is the star at the center of our solar system, that its name.
For two, 3 stars as big as VY Canis Majoris wouldn't come close to making a super massive black hole, and definitely not stars that are only as "strong" as 20 suns. 60 suns is absolutely nothing im comparison to a super massive black hole.
9hello123 1 year ago
@deathindark1
My Three Suns?
shwnchr 10 months ago
maybe they do experiment on the sink =D
rynnampier 1 year ago
Spotting them is easy. All you have to do is pay attention to anybody screaming out "it's Oprah! It's Oprah!"
starstarstar42 1 year ago
You don't spot Super Massive Black hole, Super Massive Black hole spots YOU. (Lol Chuck Norris)
Super2Donny 1 year ago 4
astro-physicists are so cool!
fuschiadea 1 year ago
Fucking Interesting!!
oEEEEEb 1 year ago 2
2) so what's in the centre of such galaxy? if it is not a black hole the a visible object?
like at 0:15 slow movement of stars... unchanged dark band... what's in the centre then?
tomy4you 1 year ago
1) I dont get one thing here... sometimes it is said that all galaxies have their own blackhole and sometimes - almost all galaxies have one...
is this just some sort of editorial inconsistency or: - we say 'almost all galaxies' because we haven't investigate enough of them to back up the statement 'all'. if this is the case - fair enough...
- what happens to the pattern whereby the mass of the black hole is proportional to the mass of its galaxy
tomy4you 1 year ago
LOL at the line shift. DUN! was sorta of creepy
WTFWJDoo 1 year ago 2
The song by muse is way better.
panic1500 1 year ago
One thing that I don't like about compressed space-time grids is that they make it very difficult to see attraction between objects of the same size; imagine there were another supermassive black hole close to the other one - according to the grid both holes are lower than the space in-between and so have no inclination to move towards each other... or am I missing something?
05swanbe 1 year ago
@05swanbe I think black holes are some sort of objects with gaint amount of matter making its gravity gaint, because every matter haves gravity. So i guess they may move towards eachother/circle around eachother and maybe fuse. But im not an expert. So i could be wrong
masterjamie9 1 year ago
SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE...lol
SeanCPFC101 1 year ago
I never thought this would be so interesting. Hmm, I think I'll pay more attention is class now. xP
EmoVeganFan1 1 year ago
In the midle of the shift.You can see a vortex.
TheWiiman14 1 year ago
this is lies--there is no such thing as a black hole they are physically impossible.
161803 1 year ago
@161803 So we, as humans, are here to define what's possible and what's not? Just because cavemen didn't know about gravity yet, doesn't mean it didn't exist, now did it?
BlackSunSerenade 1 year ago
@161803 So we, as humans, are here to define what's possible and what's not? Just because cavemen didn't know about gravity yet, doesn't mean it didn't exist, now did it?
BlackSunSerenade 1 year ago
@161803 lol, black holes are as proven as the sun is.
9hello123 1 year ago
@9hello123 well what do we really know about sgr a*? We know that it's dense, but we don't even have a coherent theory that describes black holes in a manner consistent with the standard model. Why not posit instead that what appear to us to be black holes are instead superdense exotic forms of matter? There is already some observational evidence for the existence of quark stars, which would imply a mechanism for halting the collapse of a mass to a singularity.
161803 1 year ago
@161803 A blackhole is just very dense matter. So yeah maybe it is "superdense exotic forms of matter".
9hello123 1 year ago
all scientific baloney
netk91 1 year ago
baloney, how do you think the galaxies spin. Every galaxy has a supermassive black in hole in the middle of them. Look on google earth and look at andromeda galaxy and look in the center of it.
bigrigross 1 year ago 3
black holes might be there,but as say they have infinite density,gravity ,they even gobble up light etc., might not be right because stars are not going sucked into them.
netk91 1 year ago
@netk91 but if you look how fast those stars are moving around the center of the galaxy. I mean a black hole breaks the laws of physics so we have no clue how they do anything. But we do know, theres only one thing in the universe strong enough to keep a galaxy spinning and thats a supermassive blackholes. Alot of black holes are dormant because they can get enough to "eat" so that why theres no jets of energy coming out of them.
bigrigross 1 year ago
so you mean black holes are eating up the galaxies? then why are galaxies existing and many galaxies should have shrunk to an observable degree from the last more than 100 years since we have been seeing them with telescopes.
netk91 1 year ago
@netk91 There are active ones, and there are non-active ones. Your also thinking to small. 100 years in the galaxy isnt anything. The galaxy is 13.3 billion years old. And you also have to take time dialtion into effect. The light were seeing on those pics are millions and billions years old. Thats what the telescopes see. Black holes are what scientist think are the Yang to the universes creation Ying. It all balances each other out like it should.
bigrigross 1 year ago
Comment removed
petepetruzzi 1 year ago
becouse your stupid
bramnokia 1 year ago
god cant save you ;)
AnimatorLinden 1 year ago
yes he can, he did back in 2001.
BSbrian 1 year ago 6
how?
how did he 'save us'?
and explain to me exactly how a flawed supreme being can save us from a black hole?
m3gking 1 year ago
If he wishes to he can.
AzureFlameSonic 1 year ago 5
yes he can
imighthacku 1 year ago 2
Lol, this came up in my recommended 4 u section simply because im a huge Muse fan xD.
But, tbh, i find this sort of thing about space interesting anyway!
RoLLWithITOasis1 2 years ago 52
@RoLLWithITOasis1 my dad looked up one of there songs.
i never liked the band (i dont listen to them doesnt mean there bad) and i got this video to. why did i?
SOAD525 1 year ago
Dunno. Do u watch stuff about black holes often? xD. Tbh, though, stuff can come up, even if uve only searched the thing its related to once. U ever searched up the song? If so, that could be why.
RoLLWithITOasis1 1 year ago
@RoLLWithITOasis1 hahaha same thing happend to me!!
gearsofguitarhero 1 year ago
@RoLLWithITOasis1 LOL SAME! High 5!
manofdamatch 1 year ago
@RoLLWithITOasis1 Well lol, it's the reverse for me xD. I love astronomy and all it stands for, and when I was searching for videos like this I found Muse out. Now I just LOOOOOOOVE them. My fave band of all times :p
charmeleon10 1 year ago
That space time animation reminds me of those bins that you put pennies in, and the coins whirl round and round until they fall into the bin through the hole in the centre.
TimpBizkit 2 years ago 4
so ower galaxy has a masive blak hole in the center that is inert and that may have created ower galaxy em I right corect me if i m wrong ?
LaurAgony 2 years ago
Our galaxy has a massive black hole in its centre, it is inert, but it did not create our galaxy.
supergiuovane 2 years ago 2
bbc content with ad's??
gazbike 2 years ago 2
god i love these videos, i wish there were some going into detail about how they calculate the complicated theorys. not that i would understand it but just some explanation would be really interesting.
lejink 2 years ago 8
Stupid car ad...
hotelmario510 2 years ago 3
I was informed that physicists study only things which appear to be dead. Leaving life sciences out of their calculations. If true, woudn't this make it impossible to find the ultimate, "Theory of Everything"?
boilerplate7 2 years ago
"Dead" or "Alive" has meaning for sizes like viruses, proteins, plants, animals, and even them, "Alive" or "Dead" is a very fuzzy, relative concept. At lowest sizes, "dead" and "alive" have no meaning. Trying to do physics (or even mathematics) research with "Dead" and "Alive" is just starting the wrong direction. The right direction is looking at real, measurable data, and trying to make sense of them. The wrong is trying to push this data in a religious biased framework.
paercebal 2 years ago 2
" The right direction is looking at real, measurable data, and trying to make sense of them. The wrong is trying to push this data in a religious biased framework."
ok, you're right. now, measure me the graviton.
monching1120 2 years ago
@monching1120 : The Graviton is an hypothetical particle, whose existence has yet to be confirmed, so your question has nothing to do with my assertion.
Sill, if we found an unknown particle with mass of zero, a spin of 2, and which affect the space/time continuum curvature, then it would be a very good candidate.
This is exactly the kind of measuring that was done to successfully confirm anti particles as well neutrino's existence 30 years after their theory.
So, a little patience... ^_^ ...
paercebal 2 years ago
You will not find a graviton, you will only find the effects of leaving our brane.
garyshermer 2 years ago
@garyshermer : Right.
But then, every observation is indirect.
Example: You don't see your keys. Only the light which reflects on their surface. But then, if you search for your keys, I believe seeing the light reflected on them will be sufficient for you to say "I found them".
This what will happen with the Graviton, if it is found.
paercebal 2 years ago
@monching1120 : Now, as the Graviton is an hypothetical particle, its existence is but ONE solution to a problem.
Finding the Graviton will only confirm the theory based on it. Finding there is no Graviton will only invalidate the theory.
No harm's done.
No one will burn witches or call for an holy war because the Graviton was found/not found.
This is what I meant when I wrote "The wrong is trying to push this data in a religious biased framework".
paercebal 2 years ago
In physics, is it true that is that the smaller the types of particles the greater the relative space between them? For example stars relative to their planets when compared to an atoms nucleus to its electrons etc.
boilerplate7 2 years ago
And about the theory of everything: The aim is to understand "everything" by looking at its core, smallest components, and the forces that affect them, because "every thing" is composed of those smallest components. Looking at a car won't give insight about how combustion works. Looking at a computer won't give insight about how transistors work. "Life" of "life sciences" won't give insight about physics. But physics give insight about chemistry, which give in turn insight about biology...
paercebal 2 years ago
Well actually every single scientific branch is based off of physics, as physics is basically everything. Chemistry is the study of the physics based interactions of chemicals, which then spurs on life sciences, which is just an extremely complicated form of chemistry and physics... something along those lines. If we can find the fundamental basics of physics, then we'll be able to apply those basics to everything else.
IntegratedInsight 2 years ago
Well, the Theory of everything is a physicist theory in the first place. It's not like it opts t explain why girls bitch all the time or why plants are green. It's about matching theories about stuff on a small scale with stuff on a big scale so it explains phenomenon in the universe.
And on a second note: life is build by the same building blocks as all other matterial stuff, so it would come in handy for biologists too.
wilfffilmkijken 2 years ago
i know, it does look kinda scary
DemonSlayerThe3rd 2 years ago
scary! lol kinda made my heart stop a bit
Nuqalla 2 years ago
0:36 scared the crap out of me !!
RayzzWayzz 2 years ago 3
me too
brosser 2 years ago 2
it reminded me of the creepy old guys face on flapjack
flcl64 2 years ago
OMG MY HEART STOPPED!
MetaLMunchies 2 years ago
Looked like the galaxy farted.
BooteyMasta 2 years ago 3
I know for a fact that black holes have suns...soundgarden told me so.
jstreetboy 2 years ago
What he is saying is that the dark areas are an illusion? He just represented a 3d object on a 2d plane. What if the observer was on the same plane as the paper? Wouldn't the dark areas still be aligned as when the stars orbit slowly? Lol, his hypothesis made me laugh. This video should be located under the category science fiction entertainment.
GateMessenger 2 years ago
crapped myself when the line changed xD
MrZonoX 2 years ago 116
LOLOL same here =P.
SnipeurHead01 2 years ago
lol me to
dragonlordme 2 years ago
LOL no shit...haha me too
paintitblack01 2 years ago
@MrZonoX me too LOLXD
BatangBato55 1 year ago
@MrZonoX me too hahaha
gio05 1 year ago
@MrZonoX Yeah that line-changing music was epic.
Ormaaj 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrZonoX
HOLY SHIT PEOPLE , NEW AMAZING FUCKING DISCOVERY
GO TO YOUTUBE USER : XKUNX
NEW PLANET FOUND SEPTEMBER 29 2010 THAT SCIENTISTS SAY IS NEAR 100% CHANCE TO SUPPORT LIFE
WATER FOUND, TEMPERATURES THE SAME AS EARTH
THUMBS UP TO SUPPORT AND GET AWARENESS OUT THERE
THIS IS HOT STUFF
XaosKunKillYourself 1 year ago
@MrZonoX ROFLLMFAO
Ivin3690 1 year ago
@MrZonoX i did not crap my pants when the line change, i did just crap my pants XD
emilsundom321 1 year ago
@MrZonoX
i was so scared that the crap in my pants crapt its pants XD
ste1nunn 1 year ago
@MrZonoX LMFAO!..
blckjade05 1 year ago
@MrZonoX LOL
Tyannalyn 1 year ago
@MrZonoX Yeah, same here !!!
Aleksandar998 10 months ago
wow...fascinating
MusicOnSASY1990 2 years ago
watch tornadoess
whoknowz999 2 years ago
lol
jeffnerohardy24 2 years ago
the sound makes it sound so shocking. but I dont see what the unsymetrical line has to do with how fast the planets spin around the central black hole. since they would only spin faster if they got closer to the middle. so I have really no idea what they are trying to say in this.. small video
cyborgchimpy 2 years ago
The sound is you imagining our star system rotating into that.
dkrocks 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
John 1:12
Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God
Time2Repent 2 years ago
thats what i wanted proof but i still dont get it fuck
system0system0 2 years ago
a great scientist once said if u think you understand quantim physics you don't understand quantim physics
tbinthroled 2 years ago
when the blcak line shifted it actually scared me
andyllamanipl 2 years ago
It must be the music lol. but it's really fasinating tho, well i think so. :)
tbinthroled 2 years ago
basically if we see a black hole, were seeing its billions of years ago? :S
foodawg32123 2 years ago
we see the center of our galaxy as it existed 75,000 yrs ago...but you got the jist of it...sucks don't it.
The universe is so big,it isn't fair.
noblepuker 2 years ago
awesome video! I thought supermassive black whole was the song by Muse
ddrum121 2 years ago
Oh baby don't you know I suffer?
Oh baby can't you hear me moan?
You caught me under false pretenses
How long before you let me go?
Ottmar555 2 years ago 5
You just set my soul alight.
UndeadProspekt 2 years ago
awesome video
i hink ive spotted it
ICHLIEBEmusic 2 years ago
And no black holes are not waypoints / gateways or destructive things which travel and suck everything in it.
A black hole is not more dangerous than a star with same mass.
ArseneGray 2 years ago
Humans see because of the light the objects reflecting or self-producing. For an example Neptune is 4 light hour away from us. That means if neptune would disappear suddenly at 12:00 o'clock we would see it on earth until 16:00 o'clock because the last light photon reflected from neptune takes 4 hours to come us ( into our eyes).
ArseneGray 2 years ago
and so if we see a black hole sucking in a star or a planet, then we'd see that it happened a looooooong time ago...
but if we see a star or a commet flying towards the planet, then what would the time/speed thing be?
microwater 2 years ago
oh... The closest star to us is 4 light years away... so if it started heading towards us right now, we'd see it start to move around 2013. But it'd take soooo many years to get to us (it wouldn't be moving at light speed). Comets are close enough to us that we see them start to move after a few minutes to a few hours. The issue with those isn't the time for the light to reach us, it's seeing the comet. They're rather tiny and in a rather large sky.
IntegratedInsight 2 years ago
Lol the time like we know doesnt have any importance in space. A light from a star that 13 million light year away takes exactly 13 million year to come to us. That means when you look at that star with a telescope you see its state in 13 million year ago.
ArseneGray 2 years ago
one question that i have, if stars exploded long ago and we witness these black holes sucking them in now then does that mean it sucked it back then? wtf i don't get this
Rookietop 2 years ago
the light from the explosion of a star needs a certain time to get to us. If you see a star exploding right now, then it already has exploded years ago.
It´s just like thunder. In most cases you hear it long after it had been produced.
sciencoking 2 years ago
i know that part, but when we see a black hole sucking the stars in, is that in the past as well?
Rookietop 2 years ago
no matter what happens, you´ll se the very same thing happen a certain time later...
so yes, this event will appear to happen later, too :-)
Black holes only bend the space time right next to them (which would still be a few million to billions of miles, though :P). The light that escapes will go its way to the earth exactly the way all the other light does.
sciencoking 2 years ago
yep, exactly ^^
microwater 2 years ago
well, i guess we will never know until the moment is upon us.
flamebyte 2 years ago
Who knows its space the mystery and the answer.Whats beyond space we just dont know. Is there a parallel side of space as known like the dark side were everything is opposite? WE JUST DONT KNOW its amazing what there is to space.
udum24 2 years ago
wait... we would be destroyed by a black hole? i thought black hole's just lead to another part of space.
flamebyte 2 years ago
This is just teory.what have you sayed.
ilbi00 2 years ago
Well Know one really knows but when something enters a black hole that thing gets streched really far and once uyour in a black hole there may be no escape because not even light can get out.
Drifter5031 2 years ago
black holes DO go to the other part of space but its so huge and fast it would probably destroy us all so quickly we probly would have a few secs to realize we were dieng,but we could still be alive,idk about the world being awsome anymore though
narutouzu77 2 years ago
it could be black hole or not, for example a neutron star
MFPRego 2 years ago
our sun isn't big enough to make a black hole it will probably turn into a black star or to the extreme a supernova
staticdisney 2 years ago
Actually, black holes only form if a star is massive enough... I don't believe or sun is. It take a super nova at the least to cause a star to condense to a black hole, and our sun will barely even nova :(
Boring ass star! Why can't you be cool like others?!
Skaflar 2 years ago
So you just decided to ignore what Flyerons said? Our sun isn't massive enough! No black hole, no supernova.
TBucker 2 years ago 3
stellar black holes are typically created by stars about 3x the mass of our sun - good call tbucker
macspectrum 2 years ago 3
i think humans should even know this.
Peetah16 2 years ago
i dont think it destroys everything in our solar system at first i think its everything up to mars that is effected by the super novas i dont think it will reach jupiter im sure i heard it will cave in on itself once it gets to a certain distance then it turns into a black hole. but either way earth is fucked
beech9999 2 years ago
So what if the earth is fucked? If a black hole came and destroyed us in the next 10 minutes we would be entirely unaware of its approach and would be obliterated in a fraction of a second. Basically, stop worrying about it.
bigmuffexpress 2 years ago
lol i ent worring bout it, i will be well dead by then anyway its in millions of years time. we may not even make it to then anyway its a long time away.
i never said we were fucked only our planet is fucked we probly could have found somewhere else by then
beech9999 2 years ago
Interesting...
MetroidPeter 2 years ago