... So do Lions have a more similair DNA structure to Affican Antilope than they do to Tigers? And dont give me the "on islands around South America, they are like the animals on South America but with little differences." Its called familly likeness. As for the similair DNA hierarchie, its not so. I'm an artist, if you take an antilope and a giraff for example, they would have a similair DNA structure, look as how paint brush strokes are done for example.
@assym2006 Do you believe that mankind's "moral compass" is intellectual? Do you believe that because of a more complex brain that can reason on levels far greater than all the other animals, that we humans can judge between right and wrong, good and bad? It's wrong to kill, good to love one another. Do you believe this?
@gregrutz You don't think it is wrong to kill other people? Just because we do it all the time does not make it right in every case. Killing another human is not a good thing. It is bad. That a human being should have to be killed for crimes committed is bad from the perspective of Jehovah God who says in a certain scripture "I do not delight in that the wicked should perish". Though proper to put some to death, it is still in the grand picture, bad. Jehovah himself will destroy many.
@gregrutz All of those, but I would not say religious reasons has been the greatest. A study of history will show that the first three that you mentioned should be capitalized if you want to get technical. Besides, there exist people who are very religious and yet take part in no war. Jehovah's Witnesses do not get involved in political affairs for any reason.
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuits completely altered the education system to suit their evolution agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need religion, hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important, qualitative differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption.
Homosexual activists, with complete support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims and martyrs; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
@assym2006 lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy, hubris would be so prevalent in a world without good guidance and teachings from God and the actions from God's followers... so what have you done to make a difference in your community?
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
@244Ohiro that's what i think about Dawkins and most of his type like you. It is very easy for you to blame all the "bad" on religion, yet you would never give credit for all the "good". You cannot prove, ever, or even logically hypothesize that the world would have been a better place without faith.
God is first reason of everything, Creator from nothingness and The One giving existence in every moment to everything what was made to exist by Him, so do not agree that something can exists without proper reason. Proper reason of existence of everything what exists we call God.
Evolution??? God is standing behind every change in beings. So if You, my friend, agree to call God: Evolution, then You can say Evolution is reason of change from nothing into something and how beautiful indeed. God
the problem is that Dawkins does not understand creationism. He thinks they are saying that god created each breed, each species and each animal and put it in its place. This symply is not the case. Creationsim understands selective breeding and migration and micro evolution. (dog may become new kind of dog but is still a dog.) no one is arguing that. But he is setting it up as if they were so that he may knock down the sraw man and look like he is making a point.
we will never know!!! and even if we know from what we did descent from it is just the answer of how not of the why!!! and it is the why that drives us!!!
honestly i think i know much more about genetics than you do!!!
still it is just the how with many gaps not the why which for most people is more importend than the how!!! but if you see it as your purpose spend your lifetime thinking about how it works be my guest!!!
science doesn't think of itself as never ending!!! if it would science would know that it creates more problems than it solves and therefore its effort would be pointless!!! and there are questions that science can't answer!!! this is when people turn to metaphysics and that's the field of expertise in which this whole thing should be disused!!! not if science vis versa "evolution" disproves the bible!!! this is discussion is retarded and pointless!!!
assuming you know what metaphysics are i have to except that you wont give a reason why you think the discussion about if there is a god seems to you pointless!!!
Mr Dawkin, the reason that you giving is completely false and non sense. spreading the animals in the planet doesnt make any sense concerning the Darwin idea.
@majidjoon2010 Y is completly false? , and if u said that, im gonna ask u a question? Do u ask the same question when ur mentor was teaching u the existence of god and the validity of ur bible? have u tested what he was saying? where did he gets his knowledge of this tales?
@deathshadow790 You missunderstood. What proves evolution is the pattern of geographical distribution of species. If special creation by god were true it's mean that god put species in the rigth places to cheat us and make us believe that a certain kind of evolution happened
Of course there is doubt. I just got done reading Gubbins here's "Greatest Show on Earth" and I have more doubts that ever. The guy confuses INTERPRETATION of evidence with proof on every page.
@usenetposts What other "interpretation of evidence" do you have that explains all the phenomena evolution does, plus some that it doesn't? Feel free to PM me, a decent one will probably be long.
just by your comments it is obvious you have not read anything proper on evolution. why do you look for gaps in evolution rather than proving why your particular god/gods is the right one???
"..evolution .... the product of the imagination..." you want to look at your holy book (whichever one you read) to see a product of real imagination. evolution on the other hand is the product of facts and evidences that you are free to seek if you care to do so. but i assume you 'know' god and his/hers/its creation are true so you wont care to research at least why it is that many people regard evolution as a fact and not a theory
Hey.. Valu777. Do research into what you're actually arguing about before spouting out common misconceptions on how evolution works. I'm pretty surprised fourbabies had the patience to give you the time of day. Or me for that matter. Also, what are you hoping to accomplish by arguing? Convert us? You may as well try to convince us Santa Claus is real! Or a magical man in the sky! Oh wait..
i am forever saying " dont reply " but sometimes it is hard to ignore ignorance. By the way, i see santa every year about the same time as jesus was born (though he seems to be appearing earlier every year).
@valu777 u have never seen any fact x evolution? where do u live? in The Himalayas? or do u ever recieve any kind of education? fairy tales coming from a book written 2k years doenst count ok. do u ever visited a museum? if u have kids, are they been educated? in a real school with real teachers, not looney ones.
Evolution is not universally true in any sense of the term. Why are not fishes now changing into amphibians, amphibians into reptiles, reptiles into birds and mammals, and monkeys into man? If growth, development, evolution, were the rule, there would be no lower order of animals for all have had sufficient time to develop into the highest orders. Many have remained the same; some have deteriorated.
sorry but you do not understand evolution. when you people of faith (be it jewish, muslim, christian or any other) get together and agree which god/gods and belief system is the right one to follow then you can come back with your facts and evidences and we can have a proper debate. till then read a proper book on evolution and leave me alone
Truth is consistent with truth, but not with falsehood. We can judge a theory by the company it keeps. Evolution naturally affiliates with false theories rather than with the truth. It favors infidelity and atheism. A theory in perfect harmony with manifest error, raises a presumption against its truth. Evolution seems to have a natural attraction for erroneous hypotheses and manifests the closest kinship with impossible theories. This is not a mark of a true theory.
You will find your answers by reading books ... not by asking questions and repeating religious nonsense on Youtube ,,,,, READ and educate yourself .... !
But far more pitiable is thy lot, far more terrible shall be thy condition in the day when thou shalt cry for a drop of water to cool thy burning tongue, and it shall be denied thee; when thou shalt seek for death, for grim cold death—seek for him as for a friend, and yet thou shalt not find him. For the fire of hell shall not consume thee, nor its terrors devour thee. Thou shalt long to die, yet shalt thou linger in eternal death—dying every hour,
more pitable is thy lot, for the muslim god is more terrible than yours unless you can prove your god above theirs. NO, I didn't think so. Try understanding evolution. It might set you free
Dr. Spetners book, Not By Chance, has created a stir among biologists and geneticists. It explains a new approach to evaluating evolution, and has been hailed by Professor E. Simon of Purdue University, a prominent geneticist,
Dr. Spetner shows that neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory cannot do what is claimed for it; the theory cannot account for the development of life from some simple beginning. It simply cannot account for the broad sweep of evolution.
does dr spetners book prove the hindu gods, sikh gods, islamic god, christian god, or one of the other thousands of gods? Please name the God/Gods that he has brought evidence for his/her/it's existence
@fourbabies1 When prominent biologists claim that evolution is a fact, they are stating a half-truth that means far less than what they would like the public to believe. The theory of evolution—and it is just that, a theory—states that the development of life is a purely natural process, driven by known mechanisms. But this is simply not true. There is no evidence that life developed, or even could have developed, by a purely natural process.
before i spend my money on Dr Spetners book, could you tell me which god/gods he has evidence for ? The muslim god, the jewish god, hindu gods or any others. If his book promoted the Hindu Gods, would you still be promoting it ?
The eye is so wonderful in its powers, and delicate adjustments, that we stand amazed at the evidences of design, and at the wisdom of the Maker of the eye, are exceeding the highest inventive genius of man. To say that this is the result of "natural selection, is absurd and ridiculous. Evolution eliminates design, mind, and an active and ever present God, and substitutes blind chance or natural selection, dubs it "science" and asks the world to believe it!
Why did not some other species of the primates equal or excel man or advance part way between man and the brute? Why are they not now becoming human? It is plain to the sincere student that the evolution of man from the brute is only the product of the imagination of those who wish to deny special creation and exclude God from his universe.
e uma absurdo perder tempo com esse abestalhado
MrFrancisco80 2 months ago
... So do Lions have a more similair DNA structure to Affican Antilope than they do to Tigers? And dont give me the "on islands around South America, they are like the animals on South America but with little differences." Its called familly likeness. As for the similair DNA hierarchie, its not so. I'm an artist, if you take an antilope and a giraff for example, they would have a similair DNA structure, look as how paint brush strokes are done for example.
desasterz 3 months ago
5 people are mentally challenged.
Feerulace 3 months ago
The Devil made all those fossils to test you Richard. It's a trick! We all know you deny God just so you can watch porn on the internet.
gregrutz 3 months ago
@assym2006 Do you believe that mankind's "moral compass" is intellectual? Do you believe that because of a more complex brain that can reason on levels far greater than all the other animals, that we humans can judge between right and wrong, good and bad? It's wrong to kill, good to love one another. Do you believe this?
youbintubinallday 4 months ago
@youbintubinallday '' It's wrong to kill'' Then why do we, like other animals, do it all the time?
gregrutz 3 months ago
@gregrutz You don't think it is wrong to kill other people? Just because we do it all the time does not make it right in every case. Killing another human is not a good thing. It is bad. That a human being should have to be killed for crimes committed is bad from the perspective of Jehovah God who says in a certain scripture "I do not delight in that the wicked should perish". Though proper to put some to death, it is still in the grand picture, bad. Jehovah himself will destroy many.
youbintubinallday 3 months ago
@youbintubinallday I ask a question. Why do we kill all the time if it is wrong?
Land? Food? Nationality? RELIGION!
gregrutz 3 months ago 2
@gregrutz All of those, but I would not say religious reasons has been the greatest. A study of history will show that the first three that you mentioned should be capitalized if you want to get technical. Besides, there exist people who are very religious and yet take part in no war. Jehovah's Witnesses do not get involved in political affairs for any reason.
youbintubinallday 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuits completely altered the education system to suit their evolution agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need religion, hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important, qualitative differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption.
Homosexual activists, with complete support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims and martyrs; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 5 months ago
@assym2006 lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy, hubris would be so prevalent in a world without good guidance and teachings from God and the actions from God's followers... so what have you done to make a difference in your community?
jinu4ever 6 months ago
@assym2006 Your mom was wrong for giving birth to you!
MrPeelhere 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
Darwin set out to do what God intended for him to do on earth. He set about in revealing the mysteries of faith. Good on him.
jinu4ever 9 months ago
@jinu4ever Garbage!
244Ohiro 8 months ago
@244Ohiro that's what i think about Dawkins and most of his type like you. It is very easy for you to blame all the "bad" on religion, yet you would never give credit for all the "good". You cannot prove, ever, or even logically hypothesize that the world would have been a better place without faith.
jinu4ever 8 months ago
@jinu4ever well, he started doing research as a christian and ended as an atheist. was that also God's intention?
doyoublush 6 months ago
@doyoublush yeah it is digead
jinu4ever 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God is first reason of everything, Creator from nothingness and The One giving existence in every moment to everything what was made to exist by Him, so do not agree that something can exists without proper reason. Proper reason of existence of everything what exists we call God.
Evolution??? God is standing behind every change in beings. So if You, my friend, agree to call God: Evolution, then You can say Evolution is reason of change from nothing into something and how beautiful indeed. God
akwinata1 9 months ago
I'll respect a creationists opinion in proportion to their ability to communicate with correct grammar and spelling.
breaneainn 9 months ago
Comment removed
felonarose1 10 months ago
the problem is that Dawkins does not understand creationism. He thinks they are saying that god created each breed, each species and each animal and put it in its place. This symply is not the case. Creationsim understands selective breeding and migration and micro evolution. (dog may become new kind of dog but is still a dog.) no one is arguing that. But he is setting it up as if they were so that he may knock down the sraw man and look like he is making a point.
felonarose1 10 months ago
@felonarose1 Creationism is for retards who either don't understand evolution or choose to block their ears.
244Ohiro 8 months ago
I think he blinks once a second :))
theshadow170y 1 year ago 14
@theshadow170y That's one way to spot a liar.
Flinklehurst 10 months ago
@theshadow170y more like twice a...
ThePhil909 5 months ago
@theshadow170y Fuck! Can't unsee! :D
laalki80 4 months ago
@theshadow170y Nervous energy.
youbintubinallday 4 months ago
@theshadow170y The video is slightly sped up.So is the other one from the same uploader.
denispkpk 4 months ago
who the hell care if evolution is true or not???
Da0YiN 1 year ago
@Da0YiN People who want to understand where we came from.
jimmydoolittle22 1 year ago
@jimmydoolittle22
we will never know!!! and even if we know from what we did descent from it is just the answer of how not of the why!!! and it is the why that drives us!!!
Da0YiN 1 year ago
@Da0YiN *you* will never know because you don't care. That's the difference between you and I.
jimmydoolittle22 1 year ago
@jimmydoolittle22
honestly i think i know much more about genetics than you do!!!
still it is just the how with many gaps not the why which for most people is more importend than the how!!! but if you see it as your purpose spend your lifetime thinking about how it works be my guest!!!
Da0YiN 1 year ago
@Da0YiN okay!!!!1!!!!
jimmydoolittle22 1 year ago
@Da0YiN The point of science is that it never ends. Science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it would stop.
as for "spend your lifetime thinking about how it works"
As opposed to spending life thinking that some magician is always watching over you?
pythor2 1 year ago
@pythor2
science doesn't think of itself as never ending!!! if it would science would know that it creates more problems than it solves and therefore its effort would be pointless!!! and there are questions that science can't answer!!! this is when people turn to metaphysics and that's the field of expertise in which this whole thing should be disused!!! not if science vis versa "evolution" disproves the bible!!! this is discussion is retarded and pointless!!!
Da0YiN 1 year ago
@Da0YiN "science would know that it creates more problems than it solves"
Yeah....Okay.
All your other points are complete rubbish so I'll just skip to the last one.
"this is discussion is retarded and pointless"
I concur, although I have to say, I love your use of excess punctuation in order to throw out your true motive - that you are a troll.
pythor2 1 year ago
@pythor2
assuming you know what metaphysics are i have to except that you wont give a reason why you think the discussion about if there is a god seems to you pointless!!!
Da0YiN 1 year ago
@pythor2 You shoulnt spend your life thinking about how stuff works. You should try to find out.
tarsonis10 11 months ago
@tarsonis10 "thinking about" and "trying to find out" kind of sounds like the same thing to me. Sorry if I missed your point.
pythor2 11 months ago
does this guy smoke?? he blinks too much
WindGod12 1 year ago
DARWIN IS WRONG!
MrPeelhere 1 year ago
How old is that footage? He looks older than he is now. Did National Geographic forgot the make up ?
StBarthelemy1572 1 year ago
Mr Dawkin, the reason that you giving is completely false and non sense. spreading the animals in the planet doesnt make any sense concerning the Darwin idea.
majidjoon2010 1 year ago
@majidjoon2010 Y is completly false? , and if u said that, im gonna ask u a question? Do u ask the same question when ur mentor was teaching u the existence of god and the validity of ur bible? have u tested what he was saying? where did he gets his knowledge of this tales?
nikur 1 year ago
@majidjoon2010 according to the ideas of adaptive radiation, it does. it's the second biggest evolutionary device, after natural selection.
awesomemaster1906 1 year ago
hahah since south african animals are in south africa, it proves evolution??? L0L
deathshadow790 1 year ago
Comment removed
luferbraho82 1 year ago
@deathshadow790 You missunderstood. What proves evolution is the pattern of geographical distribution of species. If special creation by god were true it's mean that god put species in the rigth places to cheat us and make us believe that a certain kind of evolution happened
luferbraho82 1 year ago
Of course there is doubt. I just got done reading Gubbins here's "Greatest Show on Earth" and I have more doubts that ever. The guy confuses INTERPRETATION of evidence with proof on every page.
usenetposts 2 years ago
@usenetposts
Nothing in Science is certain...in fact only Maths is certain...but I'm think Evolution is true beyond reasonable doubt.
If you think otherwise...WHY!!??
JolleyEFC 1 year ago
It is a body of consistent interpretation of evidence, but it's not the only consistent body of interpretation of the same evidence.
usenetposts 1 year ago
@usenetposts What other "interpretation of evidence" do you have that explains all the phenomena evolution does, plus some that it doesn't? Feel free to PM me, a decent one will probably be long.
VulcanFleet 1 year ago
@usenetposts If you've read "Greatest Show on Earth" and still don't understand evolution, you have serious reading comprehension issues.
VulcanFleet 1 year ago
@valu777
just by your comments it is obvious you have not read anything proper on evolution. why do you look for gaps in evolution rather than proving why your particular god/gods is the right one???
fourbabies1 2 years ago 9
@fourbabies my spelling is EVILOOTION properly describing the foul lie making the rounds of science
valu777 2 years ago
@valu777
"..evolution .... the product of the imagination..." you want to look at your holy book (whichever one you read) to see a product of real imagination. evolution on the other hand is the product of facts and evidences that you are free to seek if you care to do so. but i assume you 'know' god and his/hers/its creation are true so you wont care to research at least why it is that many people regard evolution as a fact and not a theory
fourbabies1 2 years ago
@fourbaby i take what you say but have never seen any evidence of fact for Evilootion , at best wouldnt you say that evilootion is wishful thinking
valu777 2 years ago
Hey.. Valu777. Do research into what you're actually arguing about before spouting out common misconceptions on how evolution works. I'm pretty surprised fourbabies had the patience to give you the time of day. Or me for that matter. Also, what are you hoping to accomplish by arguing? Convert us? You may as well try to convince us Santa Claus is real! Or a magical man in the sky! Oh wait..
g1370 2 years ago
@g1370 i take what you say but do you have any basis for your comment ?
see God created all things and that's the truth
valu777 2 years ago
@g1370
i am forever saying " dont reply " but sometimes it is hard to ignore ignorance. By the way, i see santa every year about the same time as jesus was born (though he seems to be appearing earlier every year).
fourbabies1 2 years ago
@valu777 u have never seen any fact x evolution? where do u live? in The Himalayas? or do u ever recieve any kind of education? fairy tales coming from a book written 2k years doenst count ok. do u ever visited a museum? if u have kids, are they been educated? in a real school with real teachers, not looney ones.
nikur 1 year ago
@nikur simply put , we do not see evilootion in nature , what we do see in nature is design and balance
valu777 1 year ago
@valu777 Its pretty apparent that you haven't actually attended the lectures on this topic.
jesuscumbucket 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jesuscumbucket Its pretty apparent that you have no idea of the truth
valu777 1 year ago
as usual dawkins, just talking sense. lets wait for a faithhead to say something stupid
fourbabies1 2 years ago
Evolution is not universally true in any sense of the term. Why are not fishes now changing into amphibians, amphibians into reptiles, reptiles into birds and mammals, and monkeys into man? If growth, development, evolution, were the rule, there would be no lower order of animals for all have had sufficient time to develop into the highest orders. Many have remained the same; some have deteriorated.
valu777 2 years ago
sorry but you do not understand evolution. when you people of faith (be it jewish, muslim, christian or any other) get together and agree which god/gods and belief system is the right one to follow then you can come back with your facts and evidences and we can have a proper debate. till then read a proper book on evolution and leave me alone
fourbabies1 2 years ago
Truth is consistent with truth, but not with falsehood. We can judge a theory by the company it keeps. Evolution naturally affiliates with false theories rather than with the truth. It favors infidelity and atheism. A theory in perfect harmony with manifest error, raises a presumption against its truth. Evolution seems to have a natural attraction for erroneous hypotheses and manifests the closest kinship with impossible theories. This is not a mark of a true theory.
valu777 2 years ago
@valu777
You will find your answers by reading books ... not by asking questions and repeating religious nonsense on Youtube ,,,,, READ and educate yourself .... !
khaz6pill 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
But far more pitiable is thy lot, far more terrible shall be thy condition in the day when thou shalt cry for a drop of water to cool thy burning tongue, and it shall be denied thee; when thou shalt seek for death, for grim cold death—seek for him as for a friend, and yet thou shalt not find him. For the fire of hell shall not consume thee, nor its terrors devour thee. Thou shalt long to die, yet shalt thou linger in eternal death—dying every hour,
valu777 2 years ago
@valu777 OR 666
more pitable is thy lot, for the muslim god is more terrible than yours unless you can prove your god above theirs. NO, I didn't think so. Try understanding evolution. It might set you free
fourbabies1 2 years ago
@fourbabies1 /watch?v=7CIHPor_haA
a man raised from the dead in the name of Jesus
proof that the dead can be raised to life even today
valu777 2 years ago
Dr. Spetners book, Not By Chance, has created a stir among biologists and geneticists. It explains a new approach to evaluating evolution, and has been hailed by Professor E. Simon of Purdue University, a prominent geneticist,
Dr. Spetner shows that neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory cannot do what is claimed for it; the theory cannot account for the development of life from some simple beginning. It simply cannot account for the broad sweep of evolution.
valu777 2 years ago
does dr spetners book prove the hindu gods, sikh gods, islamic god, christian god, or one of the other thousands of gods? Please name the God/Gods that he has brought evidence for his/her/it's existence
fourbabies1 2 years ago
@fourbabies1 When prominent biologists claim that evolution is a fact, they are stating a half-truth that means far less than what they would like the public to believe. The theory of evolution—and it is just that, a theory—states that the development of life is a purely natural process, driven by known mechanisms. But this is simply not true. There is no evidence that life developed, or even could have developed, by a purely natural process.
valu777 2 years ago
@valu777
before i spend my money on Dr Spetners book, could you tell me which god/gods he has evidence for ? The muslim god, the jewish god, hindu gods or any others. If his book promoted the Hindu Gods, would you still be promoting it ?
fourbabies1 2 years ago
the god of the bible the jewish god
valu777 2 years ago
@valu777
if this book promoted the hindu gods,
would you still be promting it ?
fourbabies1 2 years ago
no
The eye is so wonderful in its powers, and delicate adjustments, that we stand amazed at the evidences of design, and at the wisdom of the Maker of the eye, are exceeding the highest inventive genius of man. To say that this is the result of "natural selection, is absurd and ridiculous. Evolution eliminates design, mind, and an active and ever present God, and substitutes blind chance or natural selection, dubs it "science" and asks the world to believe it!
valu777 2 years ago
Why did not some other species of the primates equal or excel man or advance part way between man and the brute? Why are they not now becoming human? It is plain to the sincere student that the evolution of man from the brute is only the product of the imagination of those who wish to deny special creation and exclude God from his universe.
valu777 2 years ago
@valu777
I think you are under the impression that man came from modern primates?? Well you are wrong.
Man did not descend from anything that is alive today. This is basic you clearly don't understand Evolution
JolleyEFC 1 year ago