i was on this flight - no bullshit i flew into Tokyo on Qantas on this day and i remember how rough the landing was - can you post an HD version of this video cos i remember looking out the window and i was in the very last row - that's almost certainly me in the last window at 0:38 of the video. Wow - you tube is absolutely amazing isn't it!
I can almost picture the pilot saying on the intercom after the usual arrival announcments "And if you would like to join me in the bar for a beer of 10 feel free"
Qantas is a very safe airline, they do have very good pilots, however Olympic Airways and Aegean Air of Greece have the world's best pilots. Most of them come from the Hellenic Air Force with countless hours of dogfights with neighbor Turkey.
@Ram69Rod im sure the passengers on that flight, would disagree with you. pretty sure they would only want that approach once. touch down was pretty smooth.
@Ram69Rod No way if that should have been a go around... as one wrote i dont guess the pax would expirience that again,and also the pilots knew exactly what they did... no need for a go around on a perfectly good and contolled landing like this one...
@blampa Piloting an airbus,you aint touching the throttles until retard on landing... so in this case it is the auto throttle that does this work... a computer react much faster than a human beeing would be able to do in such a situation...
@ollo1982 Mate, you have no idea what you're talking about. Go to a flightsim forum and impress them there with your "retard" comments. I've got over 6000 turbine hours in a 441, my ATPL and over 140 hours in an airline 777 simulator. Don't lecture me about crosswind approaches or Qantas procedures.
@blampa lol yes.. thats why you blocked your channel so i couldnt see how old you are,or what you're working with etc?? if you have any proof,i will believe you... i am not a pilot my self,but Fredrik Stensvik is a pilot for a SAS a321,and he laughed when he saw your comment... idk... An airbus do have the A/T engaged till retard...
@blampa You wouldn't know anything about Qantas procedures unless you're working for them. Considering your location says Norway, I'm assuming you fly for a Scandinavian airline. But what do I know, this is the internet, you could be faking everything.
@blampa Wow relax sir, you don't need to get all "elderly" about it. This is the internet, there's freedom of speech and I don't think anyone is willing to listen to anyone else. I've also noticed that you've blocked me from your channel, looks like you've got something to hide "buddy". Welcome to the internet, its going to be a long stay. I'm assuming you're probably the sort of person who gets butthurt by any comments made against you. Are you showing some significant signs of anger dear sir?
@CaptainTony98 Go blow your dad. You're a captain for Emirates you ass-hat?
You do know whom the former check and training captain for Emirates was don't you? Between around 1996 - 2007. If you can tell me why he left I'll believe that a 20 year old has miraculously landed a command with a new hybrid airline known as Emirates/Etihad. Oh, and it's atrocious, not attrocious "Captain" ass-hat.
@blampa ROFL he's not even 20. He's a 13 yr old kid pretending to be a captain with Emirates. Well as far as I'm concerned its not hard becoming a captain with Emirates virtual airlines. All you gotta do is spend a lot of time on flight simulator LMAO.
@blampa 6000 turbine hours in flight simulator 2004 and your ATPL certificate on flight simulator. Well done you're working your way up! Soon it'll be time to apply for a virtual airline, I heard its tough out there.
holy yeah!! great touchdown after a bumpy approach...thats action! would love to sit in there.... i guess iam one of the few passengers with a smile in the face when it gets a little turbulent :D yyyhaaaa :D
And yes, people comparing the airbus and boeing aircrafts should compare the fuel usage of the aircrafts rather than comparing the maximum range and wingspan and all, because if theres something that can fuck the airline industry it is high fuel prices!!!!so the aircrafts which are more economical and safer are more in demand these days, and yes pl. don't compare the speed, it is not an influential factor!!!
@CaptainTony98 Well its better than any landing you can make and please don't compare it to your flight simulator landings. We all know you're a captain of a virtual airline blah blah blah. Now, go finish up your mom's washing.
@holdenls1ssz THE FUCK? WELL SHAME YOUR FACE CAUSE THAT IS WRONG HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ARE YOU BLIND DO THEY LOOK LIKE THEY HAVE THE SAME PROFILE PICTURE?! WHAT HAPPENED TO COMMON SENSE THESE DAYS? IMAGINATION AND LONLINESS... MY ASS
@Q747400 its a shame about tho how no one wants to fly qantas anymore tho. strike... strike... strike... and cya later your jobs are now done by some asian in china, congrats well done on the picket line.
@kaczerm Then try flying a A330, knowing you have REAL passengers aboard in that condition. Not just an unrealistic simulator made my Microsoft, the company who's products fail a lot.
@MoustachesAreEpic what the hell are you saying? im not talking about fsx that game im talking real life this is nothing ! Old Hong Kong. you should check it out.
@tandelbaba I would love to have a Pilots licence, what a buzz! I have a full motorcycle licence, apparently the two are very similar, all about spatial awareness
Did you ever look at the specs of these 2 aircraft? They are almost identical in length, wingspan and passenger capacity with the higher range for the A333.
@imanofficerable ok, let's see. 777.200 ER: maximum range: 7,700 nautical miles. Maximum seating 440. Length: 209 ft 1. Wingspan: 199 ft 11. Tail hight 60 feet 9. Thrust 77,000 lbf. Maximum cruise speed: Mach .89.
Airbus A330-300: Maximum Range: 5,850 nautical miles. Maximum seating:440. Length: 193 ft. Wingspan: 197 ft 10. Tail hight: 57 ft 1. Thrust 72.000 lbf. Maximum cruise speed:86.
Pal, where's the a330-300 superior? The 777-200ER is faster, bigger, more powerful with a higher range.
It's just a matter of technology. To answer 777 and 747 airbus got a340, and a380 which is no answer to anything but just a statement that Airbus rules the market and that's it. Boeing is old, have a very dark past with crashes, don't even compare to Airbus. Airbus aircraft are safe, are very modern, NOT NOISY AT ALL and the best: CONFORTABLE. Now get over it and stop comparing when its clear Airbus is the best.
@starbreez3 hahaha shitty scarebus is not safe. they had to ground those pieces of shit a380s because they sucked ass. every day you see a scarebus having problems in the news. thats whey they took 20 billion in illegal government aid. pretty pathetic. no wonder boeing outsells them
@AdverbAdjective Only thing I dislike about Airbus is the joystick. Other than that Airbuses are far superior in technology, beauty, confort than Boeing. Just be real ok, when an Airbus haves a problem atleast it can land safely. Not crash and kill everyone onboard like Boeing. How many a340's have crashed? NONE. How many 747's had crashed? It's a big number to put out here.
@starbreez3 lol a340? that didn't fly until 1991 the 747 has been around since 1969. thanks for proving my point how fucking pathetic airbus is that you'd have to compare a plane that's been around for decades longer. yeah "lets be real" you should try that. factually boeing is " far superior in technology, beauty, confort than" scarebus. that's why boeing is outselling them. you'd think with that 20 bilion in illegal government aid. shitbus would do a little better
@AdverbAdjective Show me how Boeing is superior in technology and those other things. Compare the crashes, the fatalities. Come on, this is useless talk, get over it =/
@AdverbAdjective That's bs. Airbus made the world's first widebody twinjet, first used composites, first used advanced aerodynamics and it first used FBW. The "government aid" is actually repaid in full and with an interest. Haven't you followed the WTO reports? Boeing get unlimited DoD taxpayer money and is never held accountable. Still, last week at Le Bourget, Airbus got 730 orders; Boeing got like 140.
@starbreez3 PART 1 Im sorry but i just wanted to correct you on that, there have been a340's that have crashed and Boeing's aircraft are much more reliable then you think. I have been on almost every single boeing plane out there and Pilots that i have talked to say there the best birds in the skies. Boeing has been around way before Airbus came to be and to be honest, yes the Airbus is far more superior in technology,
@starbreez3 PART 2 BUT!!! Lately the Pilots and Airbus manufacturers are starting to realize that there airplanes are becoming to HIGH TECH and that can and will cause problems for Airbus. As for Boeing they know when to keep a limit on the HIGH TECH STUFF!! :) One more thing, the 747 has been around much longer the the Airbus a340!!! You can't compare.
@FlyHere660 a340 have crashes yes, but how many fatalities? a340 never killed a single person ;).
And I know Boeing has been up for much longer than Airbus... so does it makes sense that Airbus has better technology advancements than Boeing? I'm not a pilot, or nothing related to aircrafts, and I respect your point because you probably know much more than I do.
@starbreez3 Ya I agree, when you look at the current scenario, airbus is bagging more orders for their aircrafts, especially with the domestic carriers goin in for the A320's since they are much more ecoomical to run.
@imanofficerable Airlines prefer the a330 for medium capacity to the 767, and the 777ER/LR to the the A340-5/600. A lot of the features of the 777 are found in the older a330, and also earlier Airbus aircraft.
@VWaudiRULEs Airlines prefer the A330 to the 767, that's right. And that's mostly the European Airlines, allthough that's changing with time, but many American airlines still use the 767.
But anyway, we were talking about the 777 versus the A330 and it's funny what you said because it's Airbus that's known for basing airplanes almost entirely on older aircraft.
Would u like to tell me which older Airbus aircraft has the 777 features? And specify which? Otherwise you're just shooting blanks.
@imanofficerable Not just European airlines. Globally the A330 excels in its segment. It's even in the US now - Delta, NW, USAirways, Hawaiian just bought some. USAirways successfully did its restructuring using mainly Abus aircraft. Comparing the A330 to the 777 is not logical because they are in a different class. The reason why the 777 is dominant in its class is its 2 engines, compared to the 4 of the A340-5/600. With the sharp rise in fuel prices since 2008, the 777 has been outselling it.
@imanofficerable Which brings us to the design of the 777. I already pointed out Airbus built the 1st 2-engine widebody. Boeing followed suit with the 767. Both the 767 and 777 have components pioneered by Airbus, like the advanced supercritical wing, which ended the triple-slotted flap era of the 747. The use of composites and FBW, as well as the assembly philosophy of the 777 comes from Airbus in general, and the A330 and A320 specifically for the FBW. Airbus also first used wingtip devices.
So really the 777 is one big A330, also similar to the 767, which is also similar to the older Airbus twin-engine widebodies. What sets it apart is its size and engines (but engines are not made by Boeing and technically airliners can share engines). One advanced and original feature of the 777 is the wingtip bent slightly rearwards, but the rest is really just a supersized Airbus. And many criticize Airbus for fitting sharklets to the A320NEO, while Boeing redesigns whole wings on 737 and 747
@imanofficerable Other features for improved efficiency that go with FBW, such as relaxed positive static stability and fuel transfer for achieving an aft center of gravity, were also incorporated in the design of Airbus products first, and now they are on the 777. Any way you look at it, Airbus brought together a lot of innovation from their first project and set a lot of standards. But both Airbus and Boeing build good planes (excluding the original rudder mechanism on the classic 737)
@VWaudiRULEs I think we'll just leave it at that. I don't have anything against Airbus but I honestly think that the only good series they built are the A330 and the A320. And then it's a bit strange that the A330-300 has a significantly smaller range than the A330-200.
Other than that, the A340 is notorious for the slow acceleration and the design of the engines in comparison to the aircraft. The A380, well, we both know it's not doing so well and it's an ugly aircraft.
@imanofficerable They have earlier successful models - the A300/310. The original A340 (not 5/600) does have small A320-size engines, however, everything else is like on the A330 in terms of flight controls and aerodynamics. Some airlines found the design very effective and efficient and it was made exactly because of popular demand. It doesn't seem very powerful, but it flies high, relatively fast, and is very comfortable and quiet (quietest at least prior to the a380). And they rarely use full
power. In fact, a close to fully-loaded China Airlines a340 once took off from the taxiway by accident in Anchorage and it rotated at only 150knots.As for the A380, I gotta be a bus-hater or a boeing fan to say it's ugly. That aircraft is astonishing, especially the wings - they are bent like a seagull, simply amazing. And all surfaces on the back follow that curve. It's closest to recreating nature. Look at some pictures at airliners. net. Plus it sells well, unlike what the doomsayers wanted.
@VWaudiRULEs are you serious? I've researched this myself, a lot of subjective opinions state the Airbus A380 is, well to be blunt, ugly. Have you seen how it's nose sticks out while from there to it's top is flat? The wings, they are bent, yes, it may be very innovative but frankly it's an aesthetic disaster.
You think I haven't seen the Airbus A380? It sells well, where did you read that?
Your problem is u just talk without researching, it would save us a lot of time if u did.
@imanofficerable Research? You're the one comparing airliners in different segments. I think there's nothing left for you to say, so you resort to the "subjective". The a380 is astonishing: watch?v=VdhEc07mB9Q There is a chance it will be becoming more and more popular, especially in congested regions, like Asia. I wonder what you think of the 787:)
@VWaudiRULEs Exactly, I compare airliners in different segments because I took the time to research the fact. You just argue blindly.
I think there's nothing left for you to say? What kind of nonsense is that? Go look for yourself, just reseach what the public response of the A380 is.
You say the a380 is astonishing. I say it's ugly. We're both entitled to our opinions.
I meant subjective in the sense that there was no bias towards either Airbus or Boeing.
@imanofficerable If you had done your research, you would have know the A330 compares to the 767, not the 777. What exactly is the "public response" to the A380? Some may not like it, but they are not the ones deciding its fate. The production line is actually very busy. Given the details you omit, you don't really present yourself as someone, who know what they are talking about.
@VWaudiRULEs and anyway, i thought you said the Airbus A380 was doing so good. Now you say 'there is a chance' it will get more and more popular. A bit contradictory.
Like I said, I know enough about the A380, so stop asking me to watch stuff. If i research stuff as well as I say, i know what im talking 'bout.
@VWaudiRULEs My God, that's one of the most childish clichéd comments I have ever read in my life. Obviously we're not on the same level. We both know that I've stated a lot of facts you failed to come up with, and u've said a lot of stuff that was incorrect.
But if that's the way you want to play, that's fine with me. Next time take time to read an ENTIRE comment instead of skimming through it and commenting on just one part.
I'm not gonna respond to u anymore man, it's pointless.
@imanofficerable Really man? What are the "facts" you stated? Just read your owns comments - the A380 being ugly; the A340 being slow; only European airlines preferring Airbus..list goes on. You've only shown 1) you don't know much about aviation 2) you don't know much about the airline industry 3) you're not in touch with reality. You knew nothing about FBW, composites, supercritical wings or aft weight transfer by means of transfering fuel.
of course i don't i don't know fly by wire, aft weight transfer;hydraulics; must I go on?
Very sore loser, because u're wrong doesn't mean you should go off on people does it. You probably don't know that your Airbus A380 is so big that only the largest taxiways can hold it and if it does make it big it means that a lot of airports are gonna have to build larger ramps and gates.
you're a complete idiot and argue blindly; show me ur licenses&credentials, then we can talk
@imanofficerable Except you can't point out where I'm wrong. Here it's the details that matter. And I actually I know the difficulty of adjusting airports to the A380. However, air traffic is only getting more and more congested and more and more routes and airports should open up for the A380 in the future. This is more likely to happen with the 747-8i selling very, very slowly.
@VWaudiRULEs Whatever, this argument is going nowhere. I could point out tons of stuff you say I don't agree with, and you'll respond, I'll respond; and I don't have time for that.
I know you'll probably say something (childish) like: He ain't got nothing more to say, but like I said we could go on and on and on.
Where an argument makes no sense anymore, it's better to stop. So, that's what I'll do.
The pilot has skills! Subcribe to my channal, but you should be interested in planes and machines! it's worth to subcribe me and when you want it I subcribe you back ;-)
Nice Video, but actually a bad final approach and landing! There is no need to beat an A330 (approx. 200,000 kg) down like a piper cub (approx. 500kg) Seamingly full deflection of yoke and pedals at any correction stage is a good way to make a hole in the ground, but... The red button in the tower was probably pushed already half way down. What was the actual crosswind component? The wind cone shows something like 25 kts to me. A330's limit is about 32 kts... Sorry, but this landing is only a D
@CooperCaptain qantas has well trained pilots. you make this pilot out to be an amateur which he clearly is not. it was a good landing for the conditions.
Yes Shure, they are all pros. I didn't take this into doubt! But take a look at "Crosswind Landing - by Thai Airways International Boeing 777-200 【HS-TJD】", one the same day. There you can see the difference. The huge plane follows path and slope all the way down without all of these exessive corrections.
@CooperCaptain so your trying to tell me that from a video you can tell which had worse conditions? you have no idea of the specific conditions and it looked pretty obvious to me, that in this vid the pilot had worse conditions to deal with particularly when he caught wind shear just before touch down.
O.K. You are probably right, that he was the unlucky guy this day, with the worst conditions... But are sameday-crosswind landings "Vietnam Airlines Boeing 777-200ER" and "Japan Airlines (JAL) Boeing 747-400" also easier condition landings? "Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-200ER" and especially "All Nippon Airways (ANA) Boeing 777-200ER" have very hard conditions and still are doing much better. (I mean, they don't push the plane into the ground; they let the moment of inertia work for them.)
i was on this flight - no bullshit i flew into Tokyo on Qantas on this day and i remember how rough the landing was - can you post an HD version of this video cos i remember looking out the window and i was in the very last row - that's almost certainly me in the last window at 0:38 of the video. Wow - you tube is absolutely amazing isn't it!
BiggerThinking1 2 days ago
Great piloting of one of the best planes by some of the best pilots
Arniek95 5 days ago
I can almost picture the pilot saying on the intercom after the usual arrival announcments "And if you would like to join me in the bar for a beer of 10 feel free"
notsureyou 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yep and qantas are still one of the safest airliners in the world
EASTYJAZ34 3 weeks ago
yep and qantas are still one of the safest airliners in the world
EASTYJAZ34 3 weeks ago
nice.they do good crosswind landings!
Ziedjay 3 weeks ago
big ups to the pilots for this landing... so much wind but still a smooth kiss to the runway
joadreig 3 weeks ago
woah he had it ! the way the wind was throwing that plane around i thought he might of bust a few tires touching down.
KidKlassic91 4 weeks ago
Awesome landing considering.
I flew VH-QPG last year form Sydney to Auckland. It was wearing the new livery.
She was one of the A330 that performed the uncommanded descents over Western Australia a few years back.
rockhardliver 4 weeks ago
Despite the wind, SMOOOOTH landing!!!!!
luilory 1 month ago
Bad landing
pilotforlife100 1 month ago
que pinche pilotazo!!!!! what a good pilot!!!!
captOrange1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Qantas is a very safe airline, they do have very good pilots, however Olympic Airways and Aegean Air of Greece have the world's best pilots. Most of them come from the Hellenic Air Force with countless hours of dogfights with neighbor Turkey.
KPAracing 2 months ago
Comment removed
KPAracing 2 months ago
daaamn that's some severe crosswind just look at the wingflex :o much pitching by the pilots very skillful in a such condition ;)
7thcavalary 3 months ago
Why do I fly with Qantas? because I trust qantas pilots
leon6266 3 months ago 2
thats why so many our aussie pilots work for overseas airline and they want them
leon6266 3 months ago
And on your left ladies and gentlement is the runway.
plummer89 3 months ago
Narita have become a spring....
tomodachi45 4 months ago
That was a deep landing. Should have been a go-round
Ram69Rod 4 months ago
@Ram69Rod That procedure is called go around. Not go-round
YagoRj357 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YagoRj357 Same thing?
You seem like you just want people to know that you know (when you really don't, really) what you're talking about.
legomovies64 3 months ago
@Ram69Rod im sure the passengers on that flight, would disagree with you. pretty sure they would only want that approach once. touch down was pretty smooth.
holdenls1ssz250 3 months ago
@Ram69Rod No way if that should have been a go around... as one wrote i dont guess the pax would expirience that again,and also the pilots knew exactly what they did... no need for a go around on a perfectly good and contolled landing like this one...
ollo1982 2 months ago
At 0:43 pilot throttles up to arrest sink rate from windshear, brilliant work.
blampa 4 months ago
@blampa Piloting an airbus,you aint touching the throttles until retard on landing... so in this case it is the auto throttle that does this work... a computer react much faster than a human beeing would be able to do in such a situation...
ollo1982 2 months ago
@ollo1982 Mate, you have no idea what you're talking about. Go to a flightsim forum and impress them there with your "retard" comments. I've got over 6000 turbine hours in a 441, my ATPL and over 140 hours in an airline 777 simulator. Don't lecture me about crosswind approaches or Qantas procedures.
blampa 2 months ago
@blampa lol yes.. thats why you blocked your channel so i couldnt see how old you are,or what you're working with etc?? if you have any proof,i will believe you... i am not a pilot my self,but Fredrik Stensvik is a pilot for a SAS a321,and he laughed when he saw your comment... idk... An airbus do have the A/T engaged till retard...
ollo1982 2 months ago
@blampa You wouldn't know anything about Qantas procedures unless you're working for them. Considering your location says Norway, I'm assuming you fly for a Scandinavian airline. But what do I know, this is the internet, you could be faking everything.
broumirin 2 months ago
@broumirin Try again buddy, I am Australian. And I won't have that comment about fakery on the internet. I've never heard such impudence.
blampa 2 months ago
@blampa Wow relax sir, you don't need to get all "elderly" about it. This is the internet, there's freedom of speech and I don't think anyone is willing to listen to anyone else. I've also noticed that you've blocked me from your channel, looks like you've got something to hide "buddy". Welcome to the internet, its going to be a long stay. I'm assuming you're probably the sort of person who gets butthurt by any comments made against you. Are you showing some significant signs of anger dear sir?
broumirin 2 months ago
@broumirin shut your blabber please.
CaptainTony98 2 months ago
@CaptainTony98 Silence Tony.
broumirin 2 months ago
@blampa shut your blabber. attrocious creature.
CaptainTony98 1 month ago
@CaptainTony98 Go blow your dad. You're a captain for Emirates you ass-hat?
You do know whom the former check and training captain for Emirates was don't you? Between around 1996 - 2007. If you can tell me why he left I'll believe that a 20 year old has miraculously landed a command with a new hybrid airline known as Emirates/Etihad. Oh, and it's atrocious, not attrocious "Captain" ass-hat.
blampa 1 month ago
@blampa ROFL he's not even 20. He's a 13 yr old kid pretending to be a captain with Emirates. Well as far as I'm concerned its not hard becoming a captain with Emirates virtual airlines. All you gotta do is spend a lot of time on flight simulator LMAO.
ashatbracks 1 month ago
@blampa 6000 turbine hours in flight simulator 2004 and your ATPL certificate on flight simulator. Well done you're working your way up! Soon it'll be time to apply for a virtual airline, I heard its tough out there.
ashatbracks 2 months ago
@blampa Nicely picked mate...yeah that's really good piloting!
alwalk21 1 month ago
wow awesome landing. i was on that exact aircraft to singapore not long ago, rough landing but not like that!
emirates772 4 months ago
Nice landing
clxumh 4 months ago
oh man that pilot PERFORMS.
innersilencedotcom 4 months ago
One word.... Damn.
rollercoasterfreak36 4 months ago
holy yeah!! great touchdown after a bumpy approach...thats action! would love to sit in there.... i guess iam one of the few passengers with a smile in the face when it gets a little turbulent :D yyyhaaaa :D
Swissman81 5 months ago
@Swissman81 me too :D
ustiansniper 4 months ago
Great video mate, I see these aircraft flying out of Perth everyday. Would have been an interesting landing I bet, greetings from Perth Australia
Toffa1985 5 months ago
Qantas pilots top earns like half Millionare for top A380 Pilots because they trained professionally and well selected.Love QF
leon6266 5 months ago in playlist PLANES AND OTHER STUFF
This has been flagged as spam show
BALLS OF STEEL ! at 0:43
sesse72 5 months ago
and awesome vid
sesse72 5 months ago
And yes, people comparing the airbus and boeing aircrafts should compare the fuel usage of the aircrafts rather than comparing the maximum range and wingspan and all, because if theres something that can fuck the airline industry it is high fuel prices!!!!so the aircrafts which are more economical and safer are more in demand these days, and yes pl. don't compare the speed, it is not an influential factor!!!
mnetcallin 5 months ago
Now that's why Qantas have the best Pilots in the world!!
Q747400 6 months ago 34
@Q747400 true
leon6266 3 months ago
@Q747400 I think that was horrific landing especially for an a330
CaptainTony98 2 months ago
@CaptainTony98 Well its better than any landing you can make and please don't compare it to your flight simulator landings. We all know you're a captain of a virtual airline blah blah blah. Now, go finish up your mom's washing.
broumirin 2 months ago 8
@broumirin Oh well I'm sorry, I don't have Flight Simulator. And how can you be a captain of an virtual airline anyway?
CaptainTony98 1 month ago
@CaptainTony98 imagination and loneliness ; ) sounds familiar tony89? doesnt it.
holdenls1ssz 1 month ago
@holdenls1ssz THE FUCK? WELL SHAME YOUR FACE CAUSE THAT IS WRONG HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ARE YOU BLIND DO THEY LOOK LIKE THEY HAVE THE SAME PROFILE PICTURE?! WHAT HAPPENED TO COMMON SENSE THESE DAYS? IMAGINATION AND LONLINESS... MY ASS
CaptainTony98 1 month ago
@CaptainTony98 you're an idiot. go back to your flight sim. You probably suck at that.
LandRoverWay23 6 days ago
@Q747400 its a shame about tho how no one wants to fly qantas anymore tho. strike... strike... strike... and cya later your jobs are now done by some asian in china, congrats well done on the picket line.
FUALLPPL 1 month ago
@Q747400 haaa thats nothing, check out kak tai or whatever its called they had an almost impossible final plus harsh crosswind.
kaczerm 1 month ago
@kaczerm Then try flying a A330, knowing you have REAL passengers aboard in that condition. Not just an unrealistic simulator made my Microsoft, the company who's products fail a lot.
MoustachesAreEpic 1 month ago
@MoustachesAreEpic what the hell are you saying? im not talking about fsx that game im talking real life this is nothing ! Old Hong Kong. you should check it out.
kaczerm 1 month ago
@Q747400 - Fucking oath, mate.
smeary10 1 month ago
BALLS OF STEEL!
seaboo143 6 months ago
Just another day at the office for that pilot...
jankaps82 6 months ago
Narita and its wind...... crazy! :)
ZbmwM5 6 months ago
Wind powa!
Trackman2007 6 months ago
that pilot must have fucking huge balls
niteterror2k7 6 months ago
wooo....so fast landing
LoLiPoP95ize1 6 months ago
Awesome view from camera, extreme crosswind, but a fucking NICE landing!
MickeyET7 6 months ago
both you idiots take your bitching else where for fuck sakes...
holdenls1ssz 6 months ago
The one and only truth is Boeing make real workhorses, still I love Airbus
26dacloudsurfer003 7 months ago
ah...bad weather to fly in @ the 1st place !
smartdon007 7 months ago
Fuck me! Nappy change please mummy!
4crevis 7 months ago
@Pilot Good 1 mate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tandelbaba 7 months ago
@tandelbaba I would love to have a Pilots licence, what a buzz! I have a full motorcycle licence, apparently the two are very similar, all about spatial awareness
4crevis 7 months ago
so scary..the wings look so fragile..
saymeni 8 months ago
@saymeni I know they're made to flex but it would still make your shitter go a little bit!
4crevis 7 months ago
WOW.. Well done Qantas... Text book cross wind landing...
SGH28N 8 months ago
nosssa parece que acabou a força dentro do avião!!!!
gabaranjo 8 months ago
It looks like they had some wind shear at the end.
Amar7605 8 months ago
Good landing in very difficult conditions
TimmyAndEmma 9 months ago
Well done. That's why only the best fly the big birds.
bagelboi66 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SELLER PASSPORT CREW 2011
Welcome to seller passports, UK,CA,US, European,
fresh cvv packs visit our website sellerpassports.webs.com
and place your order to sellerpassport@yahoo.com
passportseller 9 months ago
Comment removed
colonelmzebeb 9 months ago
Comment removed
holdenls1ssz 9 months ago
why the cabin light are on?
HamburgAirport 9 months ago
Scariest rocking around just when plane is getting low, but managed to stabilise things beautifully in time for flare. Well done that pilot!
ralphwahrlich 9 months ago
TOO PRO!!!!!!!!!
DKF22 9 months ago
amazing pilot. thumbs up...
ceco150495 10 months ago
looks like the piot gave the engines a kick just before landing to keep it under powered control on landing ... skilled!
BazzleDog 10 months ago
@BazzleDog - Yeah, it's almost like he's landed a 330 before!
petrhsr 9 months ago
@petrhsr havent you got sheep 'activity' too waste time on lol.
holdenls1ssz 8 months ago
Since when did Qantas start using these kind of jets...I thought they only used the Big Beasts ?
smartdon007 10 months ago
@smartdon007
Well, the A330-300 IS a big jet. It has the same size and capacity as the 777-200.
blablubb12345 9 months ago
@blablubb12345 the range and size of a 777-200 er are clearly superior to the a330 not to talk about the engine capacity.
imanofficerable 7 months ago
@imanofficerable
Did you ever look at the specs of these 2 aircraft? They are almost identical in length, wingspan and passenger capacity with the higher range for the A333.
blablubb12345 7 months ago
@imanofficerable ok, let's see. 777.200 ER: maximum range: 7,700 nautical miles. Maximum seating 440. Length: 209 ft 1. Wingspan: 199 ft 11. Tail hight 60 feet 9. Thrust 77,000 lbf. Maximum cruise speed: Mach .89.
Airbus A330-300: Maximum Range: 5,850 nautical miles. Maximum seating:440. Length: 193 ft. Wingspan: 197 ft 10. Tail hight: 57 ft 1. Thrust 72.000 lbf. Maximum cruise speed:86.
Pal, where's the a330-300 superior? The 777-200ER is faster, bigger, more powerful with a higher range.
imanofficerable 7 months ago
@imanofficerable When does that make a plane superior?
It's just a matter of technology. To answer 777 and 747 airbus got a340, and a380 which is no answer to anything but just a statement that Airbus rules the market and that's it. Boeing is old, have a very dark past with crashes, don't even compare to Airbus. Airbus aircraft are safe, are very modern, NOT NOISY AT ALL and the best: CONFORTABLE. Now get over it and stop comparing when its clear Airbus is the best.
starbreez3 7 months ago
@starbreez3 hahaha shitty scarebus is not safe. they had to ground those pieces of shit a380s because they sucked ass. every day you see a scarebus having problems in the news. thats whey they took 20 billion in illegal government aid. pretty pathetic. no wonder boeing outsells them
AdverbAdjective 7 months ago
@AdverbAdjective Only thing I dislike about Airbus is the joystick. Other than that Airbuses are far superior in technology, beauty, confort than Boeing. Just be real ok, when an Airbus haves a problem atleast it can land safely. Not crash and kill everyone onboard like Boeing. How many a340's have crashed? NONE. How many 747's had crashed? It's a big number to put out here.
starbreez3 7 months ago
@starbreez3 lol a340? that didn't fly until 1991 the 747 has been around since 1969. thanks for proving my point how fucking pathetic airbus is that you'd have to compare a plane that's been around for decades longer. yeah "lets be real" you should try that. factually boeing is " far superior in technology, beauty, confort than" scarebus. that's why boeing is outselling them. you'd think with that 20 bilion in illegal government aid. shitbus would do a little better
AdverbAdjective 7 months ago
@AdverbAdjective Show me how Boeing is superior in technology and those other things. Compare the crashes, the fatalities. Come on, this is useless talk, get over it =/
starbreez3 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AdverbAdjective That's bs. Airbus made the world's first widebody twinjet, first used composites, first used advanced aerodynamics and it first used FBW. The "government aid" is actually repaid in full and with an interest. Haven't you followed the WTO reports? Boeing get unlimited DoD taxpayer money and is never held accountable. Still, last week at Le Bourget, Airbus got 730 orders; Boeing got like 140.
VWaudiRULEs 7 months ago
@starbreez3 PART 1 Im sorry but i just wanted to correct you on that, there have been a340's that have crashed and Boeing's aircraft are much more reliable then you think. I have been on almost every single boeing plane out there and Pilots that i have talked to say there the best birds in the skies. Boeing has been around way before Airbus came to be and to be honest, yes the Airbus is far more superior in technology,
FlyHere660 7 months ago
@starbreez3 PART 2 BUT!!! Lately the Pilots and Airbus manufacturers are starting to realize that there airplanes are becoming to HIGH TECH and that can and will cause problems for Airbus. As for Boeing they know when to keep a limit on the HIGH TECH STUFF!! :) One more thing, the 747 has been around much longer the the Airbus a340!!! You can't compare.
FlyHere660 7 months ago
@FlyHere660 a340 have crashes yes, but how many fatalities? a340 never killed a single person ;).
And I know Boeing has been up for much longer than Airbus... so does it makes sense that Airbus has better technology advancements than Boeing? I'm not a pilot, or nothing related to aircrafts, and I respect your point because you probably know much more than I do.
starbreez3 7 months ago
@starbreez3 Ya I agree, when you look at the current scenario, airbus is bagging more orders for their aircrafts, especially with the domestic carriers goin in for the A320's since they are much more ecoomical to run.
mnetcallin 5 months ago
@mnetcallin Yep, they're economical and clean indeed!
starbreez3 5 months ago
@imanofficerable Airlines prefer the a330 for medium capacity to the 767, and the 777ER/LR to the the A340-5/600. A lot of the features of the 777 are found in the older a330, and also earlier Airbus aircraft.
VWaudiRULEs 7 months ago
@VWaudiRULEs Airlines prefer the A330 to the 767, that's right. And that's mostly the European Airlines, allthough that's changing with time, but many American airlines still use the 767.
But anyway, we were talking about the 777 versus the A330 and it's funny what you said because it's Airbus that's known for basing airplanes almost entirely on older aircraft.
Would u like to tell me which older Airbus aircraft has the 777 features? And specify which? Otherwise you're just shooting blanks.
imanofficerable 6 months ago
@imanofficerable Not just European airlines. Globally the A330 excels in its segment. It's even in the US now - Delta, NW, USAirways, Hawaiian just bought some. USAirways successfully did its restructuring using mainly Abus aircraft. Comparing the A330 to the 777 is not logical because they are in a different class. The reason why the 777 is dominant in its class is its 2 engines, compared to the 4 of the A340-5/600. With the sharp rise in fuel prices since 2008, the 777 has been outselling it.
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
@imanofficerable Which brings us to the design of the 777. I already pointed out Airbus built the 1st 2-engine widebody. Boeing followed suit with the 767. Both the 767 and 777 have components pioneered by Airbus, like the advanced supercritical wing, which ended the triple-slotted flap era of the 747. The use of composites and FBW, as well as the assembly philosophy of the 777 comes from Airbus in general, and the A330 and A320 specifically for the FBW. Airbus also first used wingtip devices.
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
So really the 777 is one big A330, also similar to the 767, which is also similar to the older Airbus twin-engine widebodies. What sets it apart is its size and engines (but engines are not made by Boeing and technically airliners can share engines). One advanced and original feature of the 777 is the wingtip bent slightly rearwards, but the rest is really just a supersized Airbus. And many criticize Airbus for fitting sharklets to the A320NEO, while Boeing redesigns whole wings on 737 and 747
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
@imanofficerable Other features for improved efficiency that go with FBW, such as relaxed positive static stability and fuel transfer for achieving an aft center of gravity, were also incorporated in the design of Airbus products first, and now they are on the 777. Any way you look at it, Airbus brought together a lot of innovation from their first project and set a lot of standards. But both Airbus and Boeing build good planes (excluding the original rudder mechanism on the classic 737)
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
@VWaudiRULEs I think we'll just leave it at that. I don't have anything against Airbus but I honestly think that the only good series they built are the A330 and the A320. And then it's a bit strange that the A330-300 has a significantly smaller range than the A330-200.
Other than that, the A340 is notorious for the slow acceleration and the design of the engines in comparison to the aircraft. The A380, well, we both know it's not doing so well and it's an ugly aircraft.
That's it for me.
imanofficerable 6 months ago
@imanofficerable They have earlier successful models - the A300/310. The original A340 (not 5/600) does have small A320-size engines, however, everything else is like on the A330 in terms of flight controls and aerodynamics. Some airlines found the design very effective and efficient and it was made exactly because of popular demand. It doesn't seem very powerful, but it flies high, relatively fast, and is very comfortable and quiet (quietest at least prior to the a380). And they rarely use full
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
power. In fact, a close to fully-loaded China Airlines a340 once took off from the taxiway by accident in Anchorage and it rotated at only 150knots.As for the A380, I gotta be a bus-hater or a boeing fan to say it's ugly. That aircraft is astonishing, especially the wings - they are bent like a seagull, simply amazing. And all surfaces on the back follow that curve. It's closest to recreating nature. Look at some pictures at airliners. net. Plus it sells well, unlike what the doomsayers wanted.
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
@VWaudiRULEs are you serious? I've researched this myself, a lot of subjective opinions state the Airbus A380 is, well to be blunt, ugly. Have you seen how it's nose sticks out while from there to it's top is flat? The wings, they are bent, yes, it may be very innovative but frankly it's an aesthetic disaster.
You think I haven't seen the Airbus A380? It sells well, where did you read that?
Your problem is u just talk without researching, it would save us a lot of time if u did.
imanofficerable 6 months ago
@imanofficerable Research? You're the one comparing airliners in different segments. I think there's nothing left for you to say, so you resort to the "subjective". The a380 is astonishing: watch?v=VdhEc07mB9Q There is a chance it will be becoming more and more popular, especially in congested regions, like Asia. I wonder what you think of the 787:)
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
@VWaudiRULEs Exactly, I compare airliners in different segments because I took the time to research the fact. You just argue blindly.
I think there's nothing left for you to say? What kind of nonsense is that? Go look for yourself, just reseach what the public response of the A380 is.
You say the a380 is astonishing. I say it's ugly. We're both entitled to our opinions.
I meant subjective in the sense that there was no bias towards either Airbus or Boeing.
imanofficerable 6 months ago
@imanofficerable If you had done your research, you would have know the A330 compares to the 767, not the 777. What exactly is the "public response" to the A380? Some may not like it, but they are not the ones deciding its fate. The production line is actually very busy. Given the details you omit, you don't really present yourself as someone, who know what they are talking about.
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
@VWaudiRULEs and anyway, i thought you said the Airbus A380 was doing so good. Now you say 'there is a chance' it will get more and more popular. A bit contradictory.
Like I said, I know enough about the A380, so stop asking me to watch stuff. If i research stuff as well as I say, i know what im talking 'bout.
By the way, aren't you getting tired of this?
imanofficerable 6 months ago
@imanofficerable "By the way, aren't you getting tired of this?"
I'm very tired of ignorance. I'm never too tired to argue.
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
@VWaudiRULEs My God, that's one of the most childish clichéd comments I have ever read in my life. Obviously we're not on the same level. We both know that I've stated a lot of facts you failed to come up with, and u've said a lot of stuff that was incorrect.
But if that's the way you want to play, that's fine with me. Next time take time to read an ENTIRE comment instead of skimming through it and commenting on just one part.
I'm not gonna respond to u anymore man, it's pointless.
imanofficerable 6 months ago
@imanofficerable Really man? What are the "facts" you stated? Just read your owns comments - the A380 being ugly; the A340 being slow; only European airlines preferring Airbus..list goes on. You've only shown 1) you don't know much about aviation 2) you don't know much about the airline industry 3) you're not in touch with reality. You knew nothing about FBW, composites, supercritical wings or aft weight transfer by means of transfering fuel.
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
Comment removed
imanofficerable 6 months ago
of course i don't i don't know fly by wire, aft weight transfer;hydraulics; must I go on?
Very sore loser, because u're wrong doesn't mean you should go off on people does it. You probably don't know that your Airbus A380 is so big that only the largest taxiways can hold it and if it does make it big it means that a lot of airports are gonna have to build larger ramps and gates.
you're a complete idiot and argue blindly; show me ur licenses&credentials, then we can talk
imanofficerable 6 months ago
@imanofficerable Except you can't point out where I'm wrong. Here it's the details that matter. And I actually I know the difficulty of adjusting airports to the A380. However, air traffic is only getting more and more congested and more and more routes and airports should open up for the A380 in the future. This is more likely to happen with the 747-8i selling very, very slowly.
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
@VWaudiRULEs Whatever, this argument is going nowhere. I could point out tons of stuff you say I don't agree with, and you'll respond, I'll respond; and I don't have time for that.
I know you'll probably say something (childish) like: He ain't got nothing more to say, but like I said we could go on and on and on.
Where an argument makes no sense anymore, it's better to stop. So, that's what I'll do.
imanofficerable 6 months ago
@imanofficerable Ok.
VWaudiRULEs 6 months ago
great video......great landing
jundi74 10 months ago
Good stuff... at about 0:42 he nearly lost it...
747johnz 10 months ago
Just another landing for pilots
mamatslack 10 months ago
what are they doin!!! they're masters!
MedObeM 10 months ago
what an perfictly handled crosswind landing
JACKO13100 10 months ago
That little fall near the touchdown was scary! :P Great landing!
MaDahTh 11 months ago
That is awesome! That little dive near the touchdown seemed scary! :P Great landing!
MaDahTh 11 months ago
If we put milk inside airplane and made a landing like this then we will have Milkshake
simon1430 11 months ago
The pilot has skills! Subcribe to my channal, but you should be interested in planes and machines! it's worth to subcribe me and when you want it I subcribe you back ;-)
HamburgAirport 11 months ago
most pilots would of missed and gone around!
stakemubc 11 months ago
Absolutely awesome!!
skycaribbean 11 months ago
FOSTERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
emiratesA380NCL 11 months ago
0:51 Look how fast the smoke from the
touch down is blown away, unbelievable.
vellotrol 1 year ago
Nerves of fucking steel
VohnKarWarrior 1 year ago
Scary but great landing! Thumbs up for this pilot!
jessecruzu 1 year ago 77
@jessecruzu if you wanna check out a scary landing and thumbs up for the pilots! search Hudson landing
erikgrinsvall 6 months ago
Qantas is amazing and I would still fly with them coz i can rely on pilots are really professional
leon6266 1 year ago
fantastic pilot for how well he delt with crosswinds!
Insanegaming2010 1 year ago
It's a good landing, why because it did not crash! :)
hassananissheraz 1 year ago
Wow. Crazy approach, but great landing. I bet people were holding on tight.
NJAceSgt 1 year ago
that pilot really earnt his keep that day.....
GDOTV1 1 year ago
I would be afraid when I would sit there
at 0:26
SuperBlabla1994 1 year ago
@CooperCaptain that is because Airbus wings are a lot more flexible compared to a Boeing. This would heighten the bumpiness of the aircraft.
Blazy9 1 year ago
AUSTRALIAN PRIDE !
studog229 1 year ago
I wonder what wind direction was it.. it looked like a tailwind then to headwind then to crosswind ~ confusing ~
FSXuLee 1 year ago
Thats one difficult landing in high winds!
Romerjon17 1 year ago
barf.
cmsimo999 1 year ago
that's why the Qantas livery is like kangaroo coz it's flies jumping like kangaroo..lol
LegoBrick06 1 year ago
very good job of those pilots
wixxer3000 1 year ago
WAT A GR8 PILOT PLANE ALMOST CRASHED THERE WOW A DANGEROUSLY CLOSE ONE THERE 0.43
5129568 1 year ago
Suppper Nice Landing
dougdhead 1 year ago
wow. nice job and great video
AQzero 1 year ago
smooth as a baby's butt!
Rubinho96 1 year ago
Lovely , narita sees alot of weather only the very experienced fly into there!
moonrunnerlawl 1 year ago
awesome video Masaaki!! and as for the pilot, that is top notch control! Go Aussie
1jimmycrusher 1 year ago
Your videos are very good!
jmillsf18 1 year ago
He (or she) did a good job.
crazypilot123 1 year ago
STUFF THAT!! THE WINGS LOOKS LIKE PUDDING: THEY ARE BOUNCING UP AND DOWN. THAT IS SICK!!
Matcham11 1 year ago
rough approach by qantas
wsthong 1 year ago
Nice Video, but actually a bad final approach and landing! There is no need to beat an A330 (approx. 200,000 kg) down like a piper cub (approx. 500kg) Seamingly full deflection of yoke and pedals at any correction stage is a good way to make a hole in the ground, but... The red button in the tower was probably pushed already half way down. What was the actual crosswind component? The wind cone shows something like 25 kts to me. A330's limit is about 32 kts... Sorry, but this landing is only a D
CooperCaptain 1 year ago
@CooperCaptain qantas has well trained pilots. you make this pilot out to be an amateur which he clearly is not. it was a good landing for the conditions.
holdenls1ssz 1 year ago
@holdenls1ssz
Yes Shure, they are all pros. I didn't take this into doubt! But take a look at "Crosswind Landing - by Thai Airways International Boeing 777-200 【HS-TJD】", one the same day. There you can see the difference. The huge plane follows path and slope all the way down without all of these exessive corrections.
CooperCaptain 1 year ago
@CooperCaptain so your trying to tell me that from a video you can tell which had worse conditions? you have no idea of the specific conditions and it looked pretty obvious to me, that in this vid the pilot had worse conditions to deal with particularly when he caught wind shear just before touch down.
holdenls1ssz 1 year ago
O.K. You are probably right, that he was the unlucky guy this day, with the worst conditions... But are sameday-crosswind landings "Vietnam Airlines Boeing 777-200ER" and "Japan Airlines (JAL) Boeing 747-400" also easier condition landings? "Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-200ER" and especially "All Nippon Airways (ANA) Boeing 777-200ER" have very hard conditions and still are doing much better. (I mean, they don't push the plane into the ground; they let the moment of inertia work for them.)
CooperCaptain 1 year ago
@CooperCaptain I can assure you there is no yoke in this airplane. No yoke. lol
jlip001 1 year ago
Dear Pilot,
this was great work!
Maybe the passengers were a bit scared on the final, but the touchdown was rather normal.
Probably the passengers cheered the pilot quite loudly :-)
TheGliderpilot96 1 year ago
looks easy but its very hard!!!! Need to be a well trained pilot!!!!
chillafrilla101 1 year ago