The Photon and Light Spheres, Quantum Physics

[11669932]

To me the arrow of time guides me to the

Minkowski light cone which showed me the

validity of the light spere as an approach to

spacetime. To me Newton and Minkowski

fitted my thinking better than Einstein.

PL

[11669932]

Thanks for your resonse

I tend to think of the spacetime sphere as a radius line in which

one end is fixed at an event point and the other end as an infinite

set of likely points at the suface of a 3d sphere. This allows each point

to be a photon or a surface of a wavefront (with a large number if points)

Like you I am not part of the physics academic community

I was trained to be an electrical engineer but worked in

a high energy physics lab for 2 years.

PL

[11669932]

I wish we could talk on the phone

My web page at newphysics.us has my email address

I seem to recognise your accent as between London where

I was born and Penrith where my father was born my

nephew and niece went to school in Yorkshire and

Lancashire while my sister was in Africa

Phil L

[11669932]

(contiuation of last postig)

No information is lost if the radius is treated as time or space but this would

suggest a 6d ref frame (X,Y,Z,t1,t2,t3)

Do you think a 6d frame might be a useful general model for spacetime

Phil L

[nickharvey7]

@11669932 I like Einstein’s relativity in many ways this theory is just an extension of Einstein’s relativity to everyday objects and observers. In this theory we have just 3 dimensions and 1 variable of time within an infinite number of ref frames. Continuous change or creation, we can always communicate on our channel comment page!

[11669932]

Thanks for your comments. I believe light sphere has a topolgy

connection with a system in which I can visualise three dimensions

of time and one of space. To me the surface of a sphere is the equivalent of

a point which is an infinite set of points of one end of a line AB in which time zero

can be at the other end of AB. If A is the event point B is the point (X,Y,Z) when A

is (0,0,0) the radius or as Einstein showed for spacetime (0,0,0,t) and (X,Y,Z,0)

as we are using for LS

PL

[11669932]

I enjoyed this video

light sphere was my favorite topic in NPA physics discussion group

and on my philica UK essay on this topic

[nickharvey7]

@11669932 In this theory we have π in the equations of quantum physics because we have spherical symmetry in the form of the quantum wave particle function. The continuous breaking of this symmetry creates higher entropy, the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the Arrow of Time.

[11669932]

newphysics.us is my web page

I enjoyed this video

[RaKanMusik]

This is very original thought. Thanks for sharing.

[Veritian]

I like it. You got me to notice that parallel worlds are a reasonable consideration. In fact, the word 'consideration' was central to this epiphany of mine. We do not know (and cannot know) the locations and momentums of these particles, but if we CONSIDER an alternative possibility which is STILL within probability, then we may cause a vast difference in future (eventually). The consideration of alternative (but previously probable) locations of particles is key to these parallel universes.

[nickharvey7]

@Veritian In this theory these parallel worlds are just different reference frames in our own three dimensional Universe. Each reference frame will have its’ own proper time relative to its position and momentum. Therefore we have uncertainty between position and momentum as time unfolds and Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is the same probability and uncertainty that we have in everyday life.

[yosoyelponiente]

Very enjoyable and informative.

[nickharvey7]

There is an equation in the later videos where energy equals rest mass linked to the Lorentz contraction of time. The equation is in brackets representing an infinite set within infinity. Sadly I am no good at mathematics but I believe this theory will fit in with the equation of Newton, Einstein, de Broglie, Schrodinger and Maxwell equations, Thanks for the comment.

[coffman0]

thats a really interesting idea, and pretty hard to comprehend aswell. do you have any equations you can use to proove ur theory correct?

[nickharvey7]

Thanks for the comment its nice, I have had no feedback from the scientific community I dont get a lot of feedback from anyone. I dont feel I have an unbelievable mind in fact its a dyslexic one and a pain.

[mellando]

I've been reviewing a number of videos on quantum physics ...

but your videos actually open my mind

Your thinking is unbelievable ... and very impressive!

And you classify yourself solely as an artist ...?

Clearly you are an impressive artist,

but you also have an unbelievable mind

thank you for opening a path for me to contemplate ....

what feedback do you receive from the scientific community ?